A review on: Introduction of complementary food in diets of babies

Int. J. Biomol. Biomed.
Akhtar et al.
20
REVIEW
REVIEW
REVIEW
REVIEW PAPER
PAPER
PAPER
PAPER OPEN ACCESS
OPEN ACCESS
OPEN ACCESS
OPEN ACCESS
A review on: Introduction of complementary food in diets of
babies
Mohammad Salman Akhtar*1
, Sonam Jahan2
,Shivam Dubey2
, Sandeep Kushwaha3
1
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Albaha University,
Albaha, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Zoology, Govt. Science College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
3
Zoological Survey of India, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
Key words: Complementary food, Babies, Child food, Sustenance, Wellbeing
Article Published: 18 April 2023
Abstract
Human having the long time periods of adolescent reliance, and things are considered the briefest time of
lactation. The people followed the incredible chimp example of enhancing our posterity by means of lactation and
not considering again until adolescents were healthfully autonomous, our interbirth stretch would be somewhere
in the range of 10 and 15 years. The hole between healthful prerequisites and the sum acquired from breast milk
increments with age. Complementary feeds for infants are solid foods and liquids other than breast milk or infant
formula. Complementary feeding is a process that should be taken place between the age of six months to two
years, an important period of growth, development, and health of a child. The babies are more prominent than 1
year old enough, for the most part, that has satisfactory supplement admissions, and primer correlations propose
that, here and there, taking care of examples has improved at the beginning around 2008. At all ages, youngsters
had good admissions of nutrients like vitamin B, C & K, and most minerals aside from potassium. Energy is relied
upon to be covered by corresponding food varieties such as 200 kcal each day for 6-8 months, 300 kcal each day
for 9-11, and 550 kcal each day for 12-23 months, separately. The job of corresponding food is to meet this ideal
edge. What's more, correlative food varieties should give generally huge extents of the micronutrients like
calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, iron, zinc, and vitamin B6.
*Corresponding Author: Dr. Mohammad Salman Akhtar  mdsalmanakhtar@yahoo.com
International Journal of Biomolecules and Biomedicine (IJBB)
ISSN: 2221-1063 (Print), 2222-503X (Online)
http://www.innspub.net
Vol. 16, No. 2, p. 20-34, 2023

Akhtar et al.
21
Introduction
The Complementary feeds for infants are defined as
the feeding of solid foods and liquids other than
breast milk or infant formula (Agostoni et al., 2008;
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003).
According to the World Health Organization (WHO.,
2002), complementary feeding is a process that,
should be taken place between the age group of
around six months to two years, this is an important
period for the growth, development, and health of the
child. In low and high-income countries, studies are
conducted to show that inadequate nutrition during
this period of childhood increases the risk of
becoming underweight or overweight, with
potentially serious life-long health effects (Monteiro
et al., 2005; Reynolds et al., 2015; Ersino et al., 2016
and Saaka et al., 2015).
The coexistence of under and overnutrition in the
same country, irrespective of the country’s economic
status, leads to affecting the poorest population
groups (WHO., 2002). The time of introduction of
complementary foods, as well as their type, is crucial
not only to ensure that nutritional needs are met in
the short term but also to promote good health later
in life and to prevent overweight and obesity (Arenz et
al., 2004, Huh et al., 2011, Pearce et al., 2013 and De
Beer et al., 2015).
As per the recommendations of WHO, as a measure
of public health, exclusive breastfeeding up to the age
of six months, followed by adequate, safe, and
appropriate complementary foods with breastfeeding
continuing up to two years and beyond ((WHO.,
2002). This recommendation has been adopted in
many countries, including Italy (Della Salute et al.,
2008). In compliance with the WHO
recommendation, the European Society for Paediatric
Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition
(ESPGHAN) recommends the introduction of
complementary foods no earlier than 17 and no later
than 26 weeks of age (Agostoni et al., 2008).
The World Health Organization (2001) characterizes
complementary feeding as "a cycle beginning the
breastfeed alone is not adequate to meet dietary
prerequisites of new-born children, and thus different
food sources and fluids are required, alongside breast
milk". To furnish new-born children with extra
supplements, the integral food varieties (food sources
other than breast milk or baby equation) ought to
thus be acquainted with the babies (United States
Department of Agriculture, 2009). In a few pieces of
the creating scene, reciprocal taking care proceeds as
a test to great nourishment in offspring of 6-
23 months (World Health Organization, 1998). For
example, in India 54.5% of kids in the age group of 6
to 8 months had gotten integral food sources in
earlier days, however, just 7% of breastfed youngsters
in the age group of 6 to 23 months meet the base
satisfactory eating regimen rules. In Nigeria, just 21%
of breastfed youngsters get the base OK correlative
taking care of diet (UNICEF, 2011). The difficulties
during reciprocal taking care of our setting are
explicit, yet many are normal across settings. They are
regularly portrayed as helpless in taking care of
practices and the helpless dietary nature of
handcrafted correlative food varieties (Krebs et al.,
2011; Dewey and Adu-Afarwuah, 2008; Plessis et al.,
2013). The helpless taking care of practices is
portrayed by helpless planning of integral food
sources presentation (too soon or past the point of no
return); rare taking care of; and helpless taking care
of strategies, cleanliness, and kid care rehearses
(World Health Organization, 2003; 2001).
Adding to this helpless dietary nature of the food
varieties served, described as too little assortment;
unseemly consistency (food is excessively slender or
excessively thick), barely any fundamental nutrients
and minerals, particularly nutrient A, calcium, iron,
and zinc hardly any fundamental unsaturated fats;
and to a couple of calories among non-breastfed new-
born children (Dewey and Adu-Afarwuah, 2008). The
low quality and absence of variety in food varieties
antagonistically influence the kids' development and
nourishing status (Onyango et al., 2014). In the
earliest stages of youth (birth to 2 years), a
satisfactory measure of proper sustenance has
principal significance for the full improvement of
youngsters' potential of the human. Additionally, this
period is viewed as a "basic window" of a youngster's

Akhtar et al.
22
well-being, development, and advancement (World
Health Organization, 2003). It is additionally the
pinnacle period for wavering in a youngster's
development, micronutrient lacks, and the rise of
normal youth afflictions as they run. Besides, turning
around hindering created this period undeniably
challenging after the second commemoration of
youngsters (World Bank, 2005).
Correlative taking care of ought to be opportune
(begin getting from 6 months ahead) and sufficient
(in sums, recurrence, consistency, and utilizing an
assortment of food sources). The food varieties ought
to be ready and given in a protected way in a suitable
manner (World Health Organization, 2003; Monte
and Giugliani, 2004). Humans are the main warm-
blooded animals that feed our young unique
correlative food sources.
All the earmarks of being a delicate period in the
initial while of life when babies promptly
acknowledge a large assortment of tastes and during
this period covers all basic windows of oral resistance.
Therefore, new-born children ought to be presented
with a wide assortment of flavours, although pregnant
and nursing mothers starting an early age.
Appropriately, the WHO recommends
complementary feeding which starts from the age of
six months, by continued breastfeeding for up to the
age of two years and beyond. Complementary feeding
is appropriately based on: timely, adequate, safe, and
properly fed. Based on these indicators we have
derived from the WHO recommendations five
standards to assess compliances:
1. Introduction at or after 6 months
2. Minimum dietary diversity
3. Use of homemade vs. commercial baby food;
4. Introduction of cow’s milk at 12 months or more;
5. Introduction of honey at 12 months or more.
As per recommendation 1 which describes the
concept of “timeliness”, recommendations 2, 3, and 4
covers “adequateness”, which means food provides
sufficient energy, protein, and micronutrients to meet
a growing child’s nutritional needs as required.
“Safety” is represented by recommendation 5. With
regards to “propriety of feeding, the timing
questionnaire did not assess either meal frequency or
feeding methods.
The second recommendation is based on a slightly
modified version of WHO’s “minimum dietary
diversity” indicators, by which the infants are
defined as “compliant” if their diet incorporates
four to seven different food categories by the age of
12 months (WHO, 2008). According to the WHO,
the seven food groups used to codify the indicator
are: “grains, roots, and tubers”; “flesh foods (meat
and fish)”; “dairy (milk) products”; “legumes and
nuts”; “vitamin-A rich fruits and vegetables”;
“other fruits and vegetables”; and “eggs”.
From the third recommendation, it is evident that the
consumption of homemade vs. commercial
complementary baby food defining their use of the
latter as ‘high’ if it covers at least three out of five food
groups like fruit, vegetables, meat, fish, cereals, and
milk products at six months of age. About 38% of
infants fell into this category. Additionally seems, by
all accounts, to be a delicate period somewhere in the
range of 4 and 9 months when new-born children are
generally open to various food surfaces. There is
arising proof that the presentation of strong food
varieties into a baby's eating routine by 4 months
might build their eagerness to eat an assortment of
products of the soil further down the road, decline
their danger of having taken care of issues sometime
down the road, and reduce their danger of creating
food sensitivities, and the early presentation of strong
food sources into a baby's eating regimen does not
seem to expand their danger of stoutness later in
youth. Early weaning permits human moms to
continue generating a whole lot earlier than
anticipated. In addition, human moms are interesting
in that they all the while care for a long-time posterity
at various phases of development (Humphrey, 2010).
Preparing food is more absorbable permits
youngster’s grown-up food varieties substantially
more rapidly and permits moms to quit nursing
sooner; all human social orders set up some type of
weaning food (Humphrey, 2010; Knott, 2001).

Akhtar et al.
23
There seems, by all accounts, to be a delicate period
in the initial phase of life when new-born children
promptly acknowledge a wide assortment of tastes,
and such period covers basic windows for oral
resilience. Thus, it's a good idea to open new-born
children to a wide assortment of flavors in pregnant
mothers, although the nursing mother starts at an
early age. There likewise has all the earmarks of being
a delicate period somewhere in the range of 4 and 9
months when babies are generally responsive to
various food surfaces. Breastfeeding gives the ideal
food in the first 6 months of life. Integral taking care
starts when breast milk is at a point not adequate
without help from anyone else, where the objective
age is for 6-23 months. In a few pieces of the creating
scene, correlative taking care proceeds as a test to
great sustenance in kids. Economically invigorated
food varieties are regularly past the range of poor
people. Hence, hand-crafted corresponding food
varieties remain generally utilized. In any event, when
in view of a further developed formula, in any case,
unfortified plant-based corresponding food varieties
give inadequate important micronutrients
(particularly, calcium, iron and zinc) in the age group
of 6 to 23 months. Hence, the survey evaluated the
corresponding taking care training and proposal and
checked fair and square ampleness of natively
constructed integral food varieties. Elite
breastfeeding of new-born children from birth
underlying to 6 months utilizing breastfeed (best food
during such period) is significant for ideal well-being,
development as well as advancement (World Health
Organization, 2002).
As babies develop and turn out to be more dynamic
after the first 6 months of age, nonetheless,
breastfeeding alone misses the mark concerning full
wholesome prerequisites - whereas the hole continues
with expanding of babies age and little young ones
(World Health Organization, 2003; Dewey, 2001).
Integral taking care of assumes a basic part in
crossing over these holes. Bits of proof propose that
most new-born children can burn through strong
consistency "family food varieties" by 12 months,
regardless of whether they as often as possible are as
yet served semi-strong food sources (European Food
Safety Authority, 2009). To upgrade the ideal
development of the youngster, it is exceptionally
fitting to build the consistency of the food varieties bit
by bit with the age of the babies in any event, when it
would bring about longer taking care of time for the
guardians. Food sources that might cause gagging by
getting into or obstructing aviation routes ought to
stay away from them. The danger of stifling from
ingesting specific food is regularly dependent upon its
size, shape (circle or chamber formed that might
hinder aviation routes), and consistency (firm,
smooth, or smooth food sources that might descend
the throat; dry or hard food varieties; tacky or intense
food sources that may not fall to pieces effectively and
might be difficult to eliminate from the aviation
routes) (World Health Organization, 2001; USDA,
2009). Integral food sources are relied upon to have
adequate energy thickness to furnish a developing kid
with satisfactory everyday energy prerequisites.
Energy thickness can be measured as the number of
kilocalories of energy found in specific food per
milliliter per gram of food. The energy thickness of
breast milk is around 0.7 kcal/ml (World Health
Organization, 2002). The suggested least energy
thickness in correlative food varieties is about
0.8 kcal/g higher contrasted with breast milk.
Truly, the energy thickness of correlative food
varieties ordinarily is somewhere in the range of 0.6
to 1.0 kcal/g and may be as lower as 0.3 kcal/g in
watery and weak food sources. Thus, the measure of
free food needed to cover whole energy compares the
degree of energy thickness in weight control plans
(World Health Organization, 2009). Energy-thick
food varieties are generally significant for kids with
squandering, having expanded energy needed for
speedy development. The lower energy thickness
correlative food sources have for some time been
ensnared in PE hunger (Daelmans and Saadeh,
2003). As indicated by paediatric sustenance
specialists, formative status in many new-born
children and the capacity to endure food varieties
devoured would happen around 4 and 6 months old
enough (USDA, 2009; Issaka et al., 2015). During this
period, the digestive system will have a very much
evolved guard framework that limits or deflects the

Akhtar et al.
24
danger of unfavourably susceptible responses in new-
born children following the admission of food sources
containing unfamiliar proteins, and their capacity to
use carbs, fats, and proteins. Additionally, new-born
child's kidney creates a state where it can effectively
kill by-products radiating from food varieties like
meat with the trademark high renal burden.
Moreover, their neuromuscular framework develops
sufficient prompting for the advancement of
capacities for perceiving food, tolerating spoons,
chewing and gulping food sources, and, even,
recognizing and liking assortments in food tastes and
shadings (USDA, 2009; Cohen et al., 1994).
There is no proof of hurt for safe nutritious
corresponding food varieties are presented four
months after when new-born children are formatively
prepared. Additionally, not many examinations show
critical advantages for deferring reciprocal food
sources until 6 months (Issaka et al., 2015). The base
age at which babies foster the capacity to swallow a
specific kind of food is exceptionally reliant upon
their degree of neuromuscular turn of events. In this
way, the inability to represent such capacities for
rumination and gulping when getting ready and
serving diets to new-born children might bring about
the utilization of just a minor sum or broaden taking
care of time (USDA, 2009). At the beginning of
6 months, new-born children can eat pureed, crushed,
and semi-strong food varieties arranged from baby
grain, vegetables, meat, natural products, and other
protein-rich food sources. Most babies at 8 months,
will become equipped for eating of "finger food
sources." By changing the oral abilities arising new
capacities, the thickness and knottiness of the food
varieties steadily changed from pureed to ground,
fork-crushed, and ultimately diced food varieties
(World Health Organization, 2001). The presentation
of knotty strong food sources ought to happen within
a basic age window of 10 months to stay away from
the idle danger of taking care of trouble related to a
late presentation (North stone et al., 2001).
Breast milk makes a generous commitment to the all-
out supplement admission. In very much-fed moms,
breast milk contains liberal measures of nutrients A,
B, C, folate, selenium, and iodine. Therefore, the
required integral food sources before 12 months is 0
(or near 0) (Dewey, 2001; Dewey and Brown, 2003).
From the 6th month forward, integral food sources
ought to be of assortment, and adjusted combinations
of food things containing cereals, tubers, food sources
of creatures and vegetables and fats ought to be
advertised. Just a different diet ensures the stock of
micronutrients improves great dietary patterns and
forestalls the advancement of anorexia brought about
by repetitive food sources (Monte and Giugliani,
2004; World Health Organization, 2009; Food and
Agriculture Organization, 2011). The absolute energy
prerequisite assessed for solid breastfed babies is
roughly 615 kcal/day at 6 to 8 months, 686 kcal/day
at 9 to 11 months, and 894 kcal/day at 12 to
23 months (Dewey, 2001). For new-born children in
non-industrial nations with "normal" breast milk
admission, the needed energy from free food
increments of 200 kcal/day at 6 to 8 months to 300
and 500 kcal/day at 9 to 11 and 12 to 23 months,
individually. The records of 29, 55, and 71% of
absolute day-by-day energy needs, separately,
correspond with the diminished admission of human
milk at more established ages.
The qualities can shift dependent fair and square of
breast milk admission each day (Dewey, 2001; World
Health Organization, 2001). The requirements of food
measure each day fulfill the energy prerequisite is a
component to measure the required energy from
correlative food sources and energy thickness of the
food sources (i.e., kilocalories per gram) (World
Health Organization, 2009; Caballero et al., 2005).
For correlative food varieties with an energy thickness
scope of 0.6 to 1 kcal/g, the sum (gram or volume) of
food expected to give energy prerequisite is 200 to
333 g/day for 6 to 8 months old, 300 to 500 g/day for
9 to 11 months old and 550 to 917 g/day for 12 to 23
months old kids. Energy-thick food varieties have an
energy thickness of 1.07 to 1.46 kcal/g. For such food
sources, the rough amount of integral food would
meet the energy requirement portrayed above is 137
to 187 g/day for 6 to 8, 206 to 281 g/day for 9 to 11,
and 378 to 515 g/day for 12 to 23-month-old
youngsters (World Health Organization, 2001). The

Akhtar et al.
25
quantity of dinners each day is subject to energy holes
for expressed ages, the gastric limit of the kid, and the
energy thickness of supper (kilocalories per gram).
For more established kids who require a bigger
amount of food in a day, the food should be sub-
partitioned into various servings contrasted with
more youthful partners (World Health Organization,
2009). During these early stages, helpless
nourishment has prompt outcomes of expanded
horribleness and mortality and postponed
advancement of the mind and other sensory systems
(Krebs et al., 2011). The inactive effects of shortfalls
for supplements at an early age incorporate impeded
intellectual execution and regenerative results and
diminished work limit and well-being status during
puberty and adulthood. Besides, the ailing health
cycle endures with intergeneration impacts. At the
point when a malnourished young lady youngster
grown up and faces more prominent chances having a
malnourished, low birth weight baby (Müller and
Krawinkel, 2005), where the inability to devour extra
nutritious food in low-asset settings has been
distinguished as a significant factor bringing about
abundance infection and demise of small kids (Krebs
et al., 2011). The suggested arrangement of
presenting corresponding food varieties with food
surfaces and taking care of styles by the time of babies
(USDA, 2009) is as under -
Complementary food varieties typically are of two
sorts: industrially pre-arranged new-born child food
sources purchased from the market and hand-crafted
correlative food varieties, which are ready at the
family level by the guardians following customary
techniques. Monetarily, reciprocal food sources can
be created following basic innovations, for example,
malting, popping, aging, or utilizing current food-
handling advancements, for example, roller drying
and expulsion cooking. A portion of the normally
accessible monetarily pre-arranged baby food sources
incorporate iron-sustained new-born child oat made
of food things, like rice, oat, grain, wheat, blended
grain new-born child oats, and baby oat, and natural
product mixes; squeezes like new-born child juices,
canned juices, citrus juices, and unpasteurized juices;
economically pre-arranged vegetable or natural
product baby food sources; and industrially pre-
arranged new-born child food meats (Ng et al., 2012;
Hotz and Gibson, 2007). Corresponding food sources
could likewise be ready at the family level by the
guardians following other customary techniques.
These are normally portrayed as natively constructed
integral food sources. The proposal for a particular
food type to get ready relies upon the age-fittingness
and advancement phase of babies and small kids. For
babies and little youngsters old enough 6 to
11 months, examples of arrangement of thick porridge
are made up of cassava, maize, and millet; in which
milk, soy, ground nuts, or sugar is added. Expansion
of nutritional bites, like bananas, eggs, bread, papaya,
and different natural products, would get the
nourishing necessities (World Health Organization,
1998; 2009; Müller O, Krawinkel, 2005; Food and
Agriculture Organization, 2011; Federal Ministry of
Health, 2006). Expansion of nutritional delicacies,
like bread, banana, egg, papaya, avocado, and mango,
different natural products, milk, yogurt, and puddings
made with milk, rolls or wafers, bread or chapatti
would do the trick their wholesome necessities
(World Health Organization, 1998; 2009; Food and
Agriculture Organization, 2011; Federal Ministry of
Health, 2006).
• Dietary fats comprise a significant part of
supplements got from food varieties. For babies and
small kids, they are wellsprings of energy,
fundamental unsaturated fats, and fat-dissolvable
nutrients (A, D, E, and K). Moreover, dietary fats play
a significant part in advancing great well-being and
upgrading the tangible characteristics of food
varieties (Rolfes et al., 2008). Fat records for around
half energy of breast milk fills an essential energy

Akhtar et al.
26
hotspot of babies in the period of the first 6 months of
their life. By the presentation of integral food, in any
case, fat is progressively overwhelmed via carbs as the
main energy source. All things being equal, fat
remaining parts a significant wellspring of energy,
along with starches, meet the needs of energy for
developing kids (World Health Organization, 2001;
Monte and Giugliani, 2004).
• Starch is probably going to be a significant
constituent of numerous integral food varieties for
more seasoned babies and small kids. To guarantee
that its energy esteem is understood, this starch ought
to be given in a promptly absorbable structure.
Expanding the admission of dietary filaments builds
stool mass, causes tooting, and diminishes hunger.
The absence of settlement on the meaning of fibre
and contrasts in scientific methods make it hard to
analyze proposals from various sources. New-born
children burn through an exceptionally low-fibre diet,
despite the fact that in breast milk oligosaccharides
are found to have properties like fibres. Strands ought
to be brought bit by bit into their eating routine
during the period of 6 months. Utilization of
enormous amounts, entire grain cereals and
heartbeats or nuts in the earliest stages is not
prescribed as they are probably going to influence the
micronutrient’s bioavailabilities and resulted in a low-
energy diet (Caballero et al., 2005).
• Protein makes significant supplement structure in
reciprocal food varieties. They are significant
wellsprings of fundamental amino acids and energy
now and again of energy hardship. A satisfactory
inventory of dietary protein is indispensable for
keeping up with cell capacity and trustworthiness and
for guaranteeing business as usual of well-being and
development. Then again, the consolidated impact of
protein inadequacy and low energy consumption
prompts protein-energy (PE) hunger, the commonest
type of lack of healthy sustenance around the world
(Rolfes et al., 2008). The protein necessity of babies
and little youngsters increases with age. The measure
of proteins (in grams) each day needed to full fill
every day’s wholesome necessity is 9.1 g for 6 to
8 months, 9.6 g for 9 to 11 months, and 10.9 g for 12 to
23 months. Breast milk gives a huge piece of everyday
protein necessity for babies and small kids. The
normal breast milk admission is accepted, for the
measurement of protein required from reciprocal
food sources is 1.9 g per day at 6 to 8 months (21%),
4.0 g per day at 9 to 11 months (42%), and 6.2 g per
day (57%) at 12 to 23 months (Dewey, 2001; World
Health Organization, 2001; 1998).
• Micronutrients are fundamental for the
development, improvement, and avoidance of
ailments in small kids (World Health Organization,
2009). Satisfactory admissions of micronutrients, like
iron, zinc, and calcium, are significant for
guaranteeing the ideal well-being, development, and
advancement of babies and little youngsters
(Caballero et al., 2005; Rolfes et al., 2008).
• Grain items (entire grain) can fill in as hotspots
for starches, filaments, and micronutrients like
thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. The food
sources rich in protein like meat, poultry, fish, egg
yolks, cheddar, yogurt, and vegetables, can be
acquainted with new-born children somewhere in the
range of 6 and 8 months old enough. Products of the
soil presented after some time can furnish new-born
children with starches, including fibre, nutrients A &
C, and minerals (Monte and Giugliani, 2004;
Northstone et al, 2001; Food and Agriculture
Organization, 2011).
• The correlative food varieties ought to likewise
contain food varieties wealthy in iron: liver (any
sort), organ meat, the tissue of creatures
(particularly red meat), the tissue of birds
(particularly dull meat), and food varieties
invigorated with iron; nutrient A, K: liver (any sort),
red palm oil, egg yolk, orange-shaded foods grown
from the ground, and dim green vegetables; zinc:
liver (any sort), organ meat, food arranged with
blood, the tissue of creatures, birds, and fish, shell
fish, and egg yolk; calcium: milk or milk items and
little fish with bones; and nutrient C: new natural
products, tomatoes, peppers, green leaves and
vegetables (World Health Organization, 1998; 2003;
2009; Food and Agriculture Organization, 2011;
Federal Ministry of Health, 2006).

Akhtar et al.
27
In many agricultural nations, business-strengthened
food items are regularly past the span of poor people.
Accordingly, natively constructed reciprocal food
sources are often utilized during kid taking care. The
essential formula food things utilized for planning the
reciprocal food are generally found in locally
accessible staples, although the decision of explicit
food things varies significantly in populaces, inferable
from custom, accessibility, and simple entry (Kuyper
et al., 2013). In many agricultural nations, the staples
are grains, roots, and boring organic products that
comprise mostly of starches and give energy. Oats
structure the staple food varieties of basically all
populations. Oats are a significant wellspring of
energy, giving somewhere in the range of 334.4 and
382.2 kcal per 100 g of entire cereal, and giving starch
and dietary filaments. The grains contain 70 to 77% of
all oats, which typically are handled and cooked to
make the starch more absorbable (Caballero et al.,
2005). In oats the percentage of starch is 65 to 75% of
the absolute weight, protein is 6 to 12%, and fat
content is 1 to 5%. The quality of protein, nonetheless,
is exceptionally low contrasted with creature-based
food sources (Ng et al., 2012). For example, the
protein structure found in maize and guinea corn
utilized in a few West African nations is of helpless
quality of protein and low in tryptophan and lysine
content. In Nigeria, corn slop contained just 0.5% of
protein and under 1% of fat, contrasted with 9% of
protein and 4% of fat in the first corn, and has been
demonstrated to have been excessively low to help the
development of rodents (Ogbonnaya et al., 2012;
Onofiok and Nnanyelugo, 1998).
Discussion
The infant complementary feeding practices are
reported upon initial assessment by nutrition
services. As observed in other studies (Pani et al.,
2014; Schiess et al., 2010; Dratva et al., 2006), the
timing of the application of complementary foods
tends to follow a trend as a standard pattern: the diets
of infants include only a few categories of food and
differ substantially from that of the family, with
commercial baby foods taking up a considerable
share. In this study, it is reflected that the practices of
feeding follow the same pattern and fall short of the
recommendations of WHO on breast and
complementary feeding. Mostly percentage of
mothers adhered to three or more out of the five
WHO recommendations on adequate complementary
feeding, but only about 5% complied with all five
WHO recommendations.
It has been observed that the process of food learning
starts very early and that there is a period in which
new foods are relatively easily accepted (Lange et al.,
2013; Schwartz et al, 2011). Because the preferences
for food developed at an early period of age may have
long-lasting influence (Nicklaus et al., 2013), it would
be desirable to expose infants to as many tastes as
possible in the first year of life. It is evident that the
infants introduced to solids unusually late maintain a
reduced diet and food range throughout childhood,
perhaps as a result of the contraction of the sensitive
period. There is arising proof that the presentation of
strong food varieties into a baby's eating regimen by 4
months might expand their readiness to eat an
assortment of products of the soil sometime down the
road, decline their danger of having taken care of
issues further down the road, and lessening their
danger of creating food hypersensitivities, and the
early presentation of strong food sources into a new-
born child's eating routine doesn't seem to build their
danger of stoutness later in adolescence. Timing of
the primary presentation of strong food at the outset
is a significant space of paediatric well-being
management because of its expected impacts on
deep-rooted well-being (World Health Organization,
2002; Kramer and Kakuma, 2002).
Youngsters taking care practices are effective when
the food given meets the nourishing requirements of
the baby, ensures the aviation route against the desire
of unfamiliar food substances, and doesn't surpass
the utilitarian limit of the gastrointestinal plot and
the kidneys (World Health Organization, 1998). A
"delicate" or "basic" period for the circumstance of
the presentation of strong food varieties has been
estimated, yet there is no proof that the presentation
of strong food sources during the touchy periods
impacts youngsters' later acknowledgment of food
(Dewey, 2001). A few investigations recommend that

Akhtar et al.
28
presenting strong food varieties too soon may prompt
expanded danger of persistent illnesses like late
autoimmunity (pre-clinical condition prompting type
1 diabetes), corpulence, grown-up beginning celiac
infection, and dermatitis; and presentation past the
point of no return might build taking care of
challenges (Arenz and von Kries, 2005; Canadian
Paediatric Society, 1998; Norris et al., 2003; Tarini et
al., 2006). The early prologue to strong food sources
might prompt helpless nourishment results, for
example, low iron stores by uprooting rich energy and
exceptionally bioavailabilities of iron in breastmilk
and expanding the danger of diarrheal sickness (Butte
et al., 2002; Kramer et al., 2001). Late examinations
have shown the significance of early taking care of
both planning and sum in the improvement of
metabolic issues in adulthood (Gluckman et al.,
2009; Cottrell and Ozanne, 2008). Cotrell and
Ozanne depict the programming of weight and
grown-up metabolic illnesses like hypertension,
diabetes, and coronary vein sicknesses as potentially
coming about because of both depriving and
overloading in the early outset (Cottrell and Ozanne,
2008). The expanded spotlight on understanding and
taking care of examples as a forerunner to stoutness
makes the circumstance of the main presentation of
strong food a significant issue to inspect.
Babies more prominent than 1 year old enough, for
the most part, have satisfactory supplement
admissions, and primer correlations propose that,
here and there, taking care of examples has improved
beginning around 2008. At all ages, youngsters had
good admissions of B nutrients, nutrients C and K,
and most minerals aside from potassium.
Notwithstanding, supplements like fiber, nutrients D
and E, potassium, and (in certain babies) iron started
to veer off descending, while both sodium and
utilization of unhealthy, high-sugar food sources and
drinks started to heighten vertically from suggestions
in babies, turning out to be much more articulated
among small kids. The family eating designs of those
small kids progress to require improvement. The
awkward nature between calorie-thick however not
supplement thick food sources and more supplement
thick food sources (like entire grains, organic
products, and lean protein food sources) are clear in
the family eats less. The two guardians and their little
youngsters should be separated if they are to work on
their admissions. They should figure out how to eat
more like experts than gourmands. This involves
eating food varieties in proper sums; being specific
without being exacting; and investigating a wide
range of tastes, surfaces, shadings, and flavours. A
mix of breastfeeding with the ideal presentation of
corresponding food varieties might give a speculative
impact on the acknowledgment of new food varieties
and would appear to be the procedure that best
predicts the resulting acknowledgment of food
sources like products of the soil. In any case,
unmistakably by breast feeding is the certifiably non-
vital prequel to a wide food acknowledgment, the
ideal successive presentation of corresponding food
sources of contrasting preferences and surfaces. A
speculation impact is found at all stages; the more
variety in preferences and surfaces that are capable
seriously willing the youngster is to attempt new food
varieties. This leads to benefit given by breastfeeding
over recipe taking care, yet in addition implies that
corresponding food varieties ought to be given with
regular taste variety and that the early presentation of
finished correlative food sources (other than smooth
puree) gives a benefit resulting acknowledgment of
other more perplexing surfaces, like those found in
many products of the soil.
Taking everything into account, then, at that point,
apparently both breastfeeding and the ideal
presentation of an assortment of taste and food
surfaces will be the best-anticipated acknowledgment
and resulting incorporation of a wide scope of food
sources, particularly products of the soil, inside the
youngster's eating routine. Babies are brought into
the world with explicit taste inclinations and
abhorrence; in any case, explicit food inclinations
can't be designed; mankind should be adaptable with
regards to which food sources can be acknowledged in
light of the fact that various societies rely on a wide
scope of staples. It would in this manner be valuable
for babies to quickly acknowledge overwhelming
preferences that characterize the food varieties of
their way of life or subculture so they can figure out

Akhtar et al.
29
how to like the food accessible in their current
circumstance. By and large, the food sources we
figure out how to like in early stages and youth do
foresee those eat in later adolescence and adulthood
(Nicklaus et al., 2004). In any case, even though
apparently, these inclinations are for the most part
scholarly postnatally, it would likewise appear to be
that there are natural inclinations that guarantee
acknowledgment of sweet, smooth, and high energy
thickness food varieties (Crook, 1978; Werthmann et
al., 2015) which foresee great wellsprings of energy
and which are handily devoured. Furthermore, there
are checked contrasts in readiness to acknowledge
food tastes and surfaces and to attempt new food
sources that poor persons previously been acquainted
with the eating regimen, both in kids and grown-ups.
Somewhat, the vast majority are 'fastidious' in that
they have a couple of food varieties that they won't
eat, and most are hesitant to eat extremely clever food
varieties from various societies. In the UK, from
clinical experience, the food varieties normally seen
as by grown-ups are those of troublesome surface,
shellfish, bananas, and mushrooms, or taste and
smell, like olives and fish. The particularity, which is
an inadequately characterized term, is anyway clearer
in youngsters. Additionally, a vital stage being
developed in youngsters showing outrageous refusal
of new foods is the neophobic stage, and it is not in
every case clear how unmistakable 'particularity' is
from neophobia (Galloway et al., 2003).
This stage tops at the age of 20 months, is more
limited in certain kids with respect to others (Pliner.,
1994), and continuously disappears at the age of 5 to
8 years (Nicklaus, 2009). The connection between the
natural hesitance of certain youngsters to
acknowledge tastes, surfaces, and new food varieties
and the impact of early openness to new preferences
and surfaces. The kid probably won't acknowledge
food due to intrinsic inclination or in light of the fact
that they have not been given food during a potential
'touchy' period for presentation and acclimation.
Research concentrates in this space reports on
various techniques, some checking out admission of
food at the early outset before neophobic stages have
been reached (Hetherington et al., 2015; Barends et
al., 2013; Maier et al., 2008; Coulthard et al., 2014),
others taking a gander at the acknowledgment of
another food during the neophobic stage (Blissett et
al., 2012; Addessi et al., 2005), and further
investigations, normally longitudinal, seeing dietary
reach in more seasoned kids (Coulthard et al., 2010;
Skinner et al., 2002).
Nutritional counselling is thought to be a challenging
practice, given in terms of its multifactorial nature.
The implementation of strategies aimed to promote
exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) and proper
complementary feeding must be viewed in the light of
these factors if well-established positive impacts of
EBF on infant and child health and nutrition are to be
achieved (Moreira et al., 2019). The exploration
studies checked on here, in this manner, cover a scope
of strategies and see a present moment or long-haul
impacts on food acknowledgment and dietary reach
which cover acknowledgment of and inclination for
scents, tastes, surfaces, and food varieties.
Conflict of interest
As declared by the authors, there are no conflicts of
interest in this study
Acknowledgment
The research work carried out at the Department of
Zoology, Govt. Science College Jabalpur, Madhya
Pradesh, India and Department of Basic Medical
Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Albaha
University, Albaha, Saudi Arabia.
References
Addessi E, Galloway AT, Visalberghi E, Birch
LL. 2005. Specific social influences on the acceptance
of novel foods in 2-5-year-old children. Appetite
45(3), 264-271.
Agostoni C, Decsi T, Fewtrell M, Goulet O,
Kolacek S, Koletzko B, Michaelsen KF,
Moreno L, Puntis J, Rigo J. 2008.
Complementary feeding: A commentary by the
ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. J. Pediatr.
Gastroenterol. Nutr 46, 99-110.

Akhtar et al.
30
Allen LH. 2012. Adequacy of family foods for
complementary feeding. Am J Clin Nutr 95, 785-6.
Arenz S, von Kries R. 2005. Protective effect of
breastfeeding against obesity in childhood: Can a
meta-analysis of observational studies help to validate
the hypothesis? Advances in Experimental Medicine
and Biology 569, 40-48.
Arenz S, Ruckerl R, Koletzko B, von Kries R.
2004. Breast-feeding and childhood obesity—A
systematic review. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord
28, 1247-1256.
Barends C, de Vries J, Mojet J, de Graaf C.
2013. Effects of repeated exposure to either
vegetables or fruits on infant’s vegetable and fruit
acceptance at the beginning of weaning. Food Qual
Prefer 29(2), 157-165.
Baye K, Guyot JP, Icard-Vernie’re C,
Mouquet-Rivier C. 2012. Nutrient intakes from
complementary foods consumed by young children
(aged 12-23 months) from North Wollo, northern
Ethiopia: the need for agro-ecologically adapted
interventions. Public Health Nutr 16(10), 1741-50.10.
Blissett J, Bennett C, Donohoe J, Rogers S,
Higgs S. 2012. Predicting successful introduction of
novel fruit to children. J Acad Nutr Diet 112, 1959-1967.
Butte NF, Lopez-Alarcon MG, Garza C. 2002.
Nutrient adequacy of exclusive breastfeeding for the
term infant during the frist six months of life. WHO.
Caballero B, Allen L, Prentice A, editors. 2005.
Encyclopedia of Human Nutrition. 2nd ed Oxford:
Elsevier Academic Press.
Canadian Pediatric Society. 1998. Nutrition for
healthy term infants. In: Ottowa Minister of Public
Works and Government Services.
Cohen RJ, Brown KH, Canahuati J, Rivera LL,
Dewey KG. 1994. Effects of age of introduction of
complementary foods on infant breast milk intake, total
energy intake, and growth: a randomised intervention
study in Honduras. Lancet 343, 288-93.10.
Cottrell EC, Ozanne SE. 2008. Early life
programming of obesity and metabolic disease.
Physiology & Behavior 94, 17-28.
Coulthard H, Harris G, Emmett P. 2010. The
ALSPAC team long term consequences of early fruit
and vegetable feeding practices. Public Health Nutr
13(12), 2044-51.
Coulthard H, Harris G, Fogel A. 2014. Exposure
to vegetable variety in infants weaned at different
ages. Appetite 78, 89-94.
Crook CK. 1978. Taste perception in the newborn
infant. Infant Behav Dev 1, 52-69.
De Beer M, Vrijkotte TG, Fall CH, van Eijsden
M, Osmond C, Gemke RJ. 2015. Associations of
infant feeding and timing of linear growth and
relative weight gain during early life with childhood
body composition. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 39, 586-592.
Della Salute, M. Linee di Indirizzo Nazionali
Sulla Protezione, la Promozione ed il
Sostegno Dell’allattamento al Seno. 2008.
Gazzetta Ufficiale: Roma, Italy.
Dewey KG, Adu-Afarwuah S. 2008. Systematic
review of the efficacy and effectiveness of
complementary feeding interventions in developing
countries. Matern Child Nutr 4, 24-85.
Dewey KG, Brown KH. 2003. Update on technical
issues concerning complementary feeding of young
children in developing countries and implications for
intervention programs. Food Nut Bull 24, 5-28.10.
Dewey KG. 2001. Nutrition, growth and
complementary feeding of breastfed infant. Pediatr
Clin North Am 48(1), 87-104.10.
Dewey KG. 2013. The challenge of meeting nutrient
needs of infants and young children during the period
of complementary feeding: an evolutionary
perspective. J Nutr 143, 2050-4.

Akhtar et al.
31
Dratva J, Merten S, Ackermann-Liebrich U.
2006. The timing of complementary feeding of infants in
Switzerland: Compliance with the Swiss and the WHO
guidelines. Acta Paediatric 95, 818-825.
Ersino G, Henry CJ, Zello GA. 2016. Suboptimal
Feeding Practices and High Levels of Undernutrition
Among Infants and Young Children in the Rural
Communities of Halaba and Zeway, Ethiopia. Food
Nutr. Bull 37, 409-424.
European Food Safety Authority. 2009.
Scientific opinion on the appropriate age for
introduction of complementary feeding of infants.
EFSA J 7(12), 1423.
Federal Ministry of Health. 2006.
Complementary Feeding Recipes for Ethiopian
Children 6-23 Months Old: A Practical Cooking and
Feeding Guide. Addis Ababa: Federal Ministry of
Health: FMOH.
Food and Agriculture Organization. 2011. The
State of Food Insecurity in the World: How Does
International Price Volatility Affect Domestic
Economies and Food Insecurity? Rome: Publishing
Policy and Support Branch: FAO.
Galloway AT, Lee Y, Birch LL. 2003. Predictors
and consequences of food neophobia and pickiness in
young girls. J Am Diet Assoc 103(6), 692-698.
Gibson RS, Bailey KB, Gibbs M, Ferguson EL.
2010. A review of phytate, iron, zinc, and calcium
concentrations in plant-based complementary foods
used in low-income countries and implications for
bioavailability. Food Nutr Bull 31(2 Suppl), S134-46.
Gibson RS, Ferguson EL, Lehrfeld J. 1998.
Complementary foods for infant feeding in developing
countries: their nutrient adequacy and improvement.
Eur J Clin Nutr 31, 205-28.
Global strategy for infant and young child
feeding. 2003. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Bateson P, Beedle
AS, Law CM, Butta ZA. 2009. Towards a new
developmental synthesis: Adaptive developmental
plasticity and human disease. Lancet 373, 1654-1657.
Hetherington M, Schwartz C, Madrelle J,
Croden F, Nekitsing C, Vereijken C. 2015. A
step-by-step introduction to vegetables at the
beginning of complementary feeding. The effects of
early and repeated exposure. Appetite 84, 280-290.
Hotz C, Gibson RS. 2007. Traditional food-
processing and preparation practices to enhance the
bioavailability of micronutrients in plant-based diets.
J Nutr 137(4), 1097-100.
Huh SY, Rifas-Shiman SL, Taveras EM, Oken
E, Gillman MW. 2011. Timing of solid food
introduction and risk of obesity in preschool-aged
children. Pediatrics 127, 544-551.
Humphrey LT. 2010. Weaning behavior in human
evolution. Semin Cell Dev Biol 21, 453-61.
Issaka AI, Agho KE, Page AN, Burns PL,
Stevens GJ, Dibley MJ. 2015. Comparisons of
complementary feeding indicators among children
aged 6-23 months in Anglophone and Francophone
West African countries. Matern Child Nutr 11, 1-13.
Knott C. 2001. Reproductive ecology and human
evolution. In: Ellison, editor. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine
De Gruyter 429-63.
Kramer MS, Chalmers B, Hodnett ED,
Sevkovskaya Z, Dzikovich I, Shapiro S. 2001.
Promotion of breastfeeding intervention trial
(PROBIT): A randomized trial in the Republic of
Belarus. The Journal of the American Medical
Association 285, 413-420.
Kramer M, Kakuma R. 2002. The optimal
duration of exclusive breastfeeding: a systematic
review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Issue 1. Art. No.: CD003517.

Akhtar et al.
32
Krebs NF, Hambidge KM, Mazariegos M,
Westcott J, Goco N, Wright LL. 2011.
Complementary feeding: A global network cluster
randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatr 11(4), 4.
Kuyper E, Vitta B, Dewey KG. 2013. Novel and
underused food sources of key nutrients for
complementary feeding. A&T Tech Brief 6, 1-8.
Lange C, Visalli M, Jacob S, Chabanet C,
Schlich P, Nicklaus S. 2013. Maternal feeding
practices during the first year and their impact on
infants’ acceptance of complementary food. Food
Qual. Prefer 29, 89-98.
Lanigan JA, Bishop JA, Kimber AC, Morgan J.
2001. Systematic review concerning the age of
introduction of complementary foods to the healthy
full-term infant. Eur J Clin Nutr 55, 309-20.
Maier AS, Chabanet C, Schaal B, Leathwood
PD, Issanchou SN. 2008. Breastfeeding and
experience with variety early in weaning increase
infantsacceptance of new foods for up to two months.
Clin Nutr 27, 849-857.
Monte CM, Giugliani ER. Recommendations for
the complementary feeding of the breastfed child. J
Pediatr 80(5 Sul), S131-41.
Monteiro POA, Victora CG. 2005. Rapid growth
in infancy and childhood and obesity in later life- A
systematic review. Obes. Rev 6, 143-154.
Moreira LC, Oliveira EB, Lopes LH, Bauleo
ME, Sarno F. 2019. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 16, 17(3).
Müller O, Krawinkel M. 2005. Malnutrition and
health in developing countries. CMAJ 173(2), 279-86.
Ng CS, Dibley MJ, Agho KE. 2012.
Complementary feeding indicators and determinants
of poor feeding practices in Indonesia: a secondary
analysis of 2007 Demographic and Health Survey
data. Public Health Nutr 15(5), 827-39.
Nicklaus S, Boggio V, Chabanet C, Issanchou
SA. 2004. Prospective study of food preferences in
childhood. Food Qual Prefer 15, 805-18.
Nicklaus S. 2009. Development of food variety in
children. Appetite 52(1), 253-5.
Nicklaus S, Remy E. 2013. Early origins of
overeating: Tracking between early food habits and
later eating patterns. Curr. Obes. Rep 2, 179-184.
Norris JM, Barriga K, Klingensmith G, Hoffman
M, Eisenbarth GS, Erlich HA, Rewers M. 2003.
Timing of initial cereal exposure in infancy and risk of
islet autoimmunity. The Journal of the American
Medical Association 290(13), 1713-1720.
Northstone K, Emmett P, Nethersole F. 2001.
The effect of age of introduction to lumpy solid foods
eaten and reported feeding difficulties at 6 and 15
months. J Hum Nutr Diet 14, 43-54.
Ogbonnaya JA, Ketiku AO, Mojekwu CN,
Mojekwu JN, Ogbonnaya JA. 2012. Energy, iron
and zinc densities of commonly consumed traditional
complementary foods in Nigeria. Br J Appl Sci
Technol 2(1), 48-57.
Onofiok NO, Nnanyelugo DO. 1998. Weaning
foods in West Africa: nutritional problems and
possible solutions. Food Nutr Bull 19(1), 27-33.
Onyango AW, Borghi E, de-Onis M, Casanovas
MD, Garza C. 2014. Complementary feeding and
attained linear growth among 6-23-month-old
children. Public Health Nutr 17(9), 1975-83.
Pani P, Carletti C, Knowles A, Parpinel M,
Concina F, Montico M, Cattaneo A. 2014. Patterns
of nutrient intake at six months in the northeast of Italy:
A cohort study. BMC Pediatr 14, 127.
Pearce J, Taylor MA, Langley-Evans SC. 2013.
Timing of the introduction of complementary feeding
and risk of childhood obesity: A systematic review.
Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 37, 1295-1306.

Akhtar et al.
33
Perlas LA. 2013. Nutrient Adequacy of
Complementary Diets in Cebu, Philippines and
Evaluation of Household Methods for Their
Improvement. Graduate Student’s thesis, University
of Otago, New Zealand.
Plessis LM, Kruger HS, Sweet L. 2013.
Complementary feeding: a critical window of
opportunity from six months onwards. S Afr J Clin
Nutr 26(3 Suppl), S129-40.
Pliner P. 1994. Development of measures of food
neophobia in children. Appetite 23(2), 147-163.
Reeds PJ, Garlick PJ. 2003. Protein and amino acid
requirements and the composition of complementary
foods. J Nutr 133(Suppl), 2953S-61S.
Reynolds CM, Gray C, Li M, Segovia SA,
Vickers MH. 2015. Early Life Nutrition and Energy
Balance Disorders in Offspring in Later Life.
Nutrients 7, 8090-8111.
Rolfes SR, Pinna K, Whitney E. 2008.
Understanding Normal and Clinical Nutrition. 8th ed
Canada: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Saaka M, Wemakor A, Abizari AR, Aryee P. 2015.
How well do WHO complementary feeding indicators
relate to nutritional status of children aged 6-23 months
in rural Northern Ghana? BMC Public Health 15, 1157.
Schiess S, Grote V, Scaglioni S, Luque V, Martin
F, Stolarczyk A, Vecchi F, Koletzko B. 2010.
European Childhood Obesity Project. Introduction of
complementary feeding in 5 European countries. J.
Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr 50, 92-98.
Schwartz C, Scholtens PA, Lalanne A, Weenen
H, Nicklaus S. 2011. Development of healthy eating
habits early in life. Review of recent evidence and
selected guidelines. Appetite 57, 796-807.
Skinner J, Carruth B, Bounds W, Zielger P,
Reidy K. 2002. Do food-related experiences in the
first 2 years of life predict dietary variety in school age
d children? J Nutr Educ Behav 34, 310-315.
Tarini B, Carroll A, Sox C, Christakis D. 2006.
Systematic review of the relationship between early
introduction of solid foods to infants and the
development of allergic disease. Archives of Pediatrics
and Adolescent Medicine 160, 502-507.
Temesgen M. 2013. Nutritional status of Ethiopian
weaning and complementary foods: a review. Open
Access Sci Rep 2(2), 1-9.10.4172/scientificr.
United Nations Children’s Fund. 2011.
Programming Guide: Infant and Young Child
Feeding. New York: UNICEF.
United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA). 2009. Complementary feeding. In: U. S.
(USDA), editor. Infant Nutrition and Feeding.
Washington, DC: United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) p. 101-28.
Werthmann J, Jansen A, Havermans R,
Nederkoorn C, Kremers S, Roefs A. Bits and
pieces. 2015. Food texture influences food
acceptance in young children. Appetite 84, 181-187.
World Bank. 2005. Repositioning Nutrition as
Central to Development: A Strategy for Large Scale
Action. Washington D.C: The World Bank.
World Health Organization. 2001. Guiding
Principles for Complementary Feeding of the
Breastfed Child. Geneva: WHO Press.
World Health Organization. 2002.
Complementary Feeding: Report of the Global
Consultation, and Summary of Guiding Principles for
Complementary Feeding of the Breastfed Child;
WHO: Geneva, Switzerland.
World Health Organization. 2002. Infant and
child nutrition: Global strategy for infant and young
child feeding.
World Health Organization. 2002. The United
Nations Children’s Fund. Global Strategy for Infant
and Young Child Feeding; WHO: Geneva,
Switzerland.

Akhtar et al.
34
World Health Organization. 2003. The World Health
Report: Shaping the Future. Geneva: WHO Press.
World Health Organization. 2008. The United
Nations Children’s Fund. Indicators for assessing
infant and young child feeding practices. In
Proceedings of the Conclusions of a Consensus
Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 6-8 November 2007;
WHO: Geneva, Switzerland.
World Health Organization. 2009. Infant and
Young Child Feeding: Model Chapter for Textbooks
for Medical Students and Allied Health Professionals.
Geneva: WHO Press.
World Health Organization/United Nation
Children’s Fund. 1998. Complementary Feeding of
Young Children in Developing Countries: A Review of
Current Scientific Knowledge. Geneva: WHO Press.
World Health Organization/United Nation
Children’s Fund. 2003. Global Strategy for Infant
and Young Child Feeding. Geneva: WHO Press.

A review on: Introduction of complementary food in diets of babies

More Related Content

Similar to A review on: Introduction of complementary food in diets of babies

More from Open Access Research Paper

Recently uploaded

A review on: Introduction of complementary food in diets of babies