A study on the functional properties of silk and polyester lyocell mixed fabric

ISSN 1517-7076 artigo 11662, pp.924-935, 2015
A study on the functional properties
of silk and polyester / lyocell
mixed fabric
Jeyakodi Moses Jeyaraj1
, Mariappan Arumugam2
,
Vellingiri Kulandaiappan3
1,2
Department of Applied Science, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore 641004
e-mail: jj_moses2k2@yahoo.co.in, marips_psg@yahoo.com
3
Department of Fashion Technology, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore 641004, India
e-mail: rkvgiri@yahoo.com
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
ABSTRACT
Silk is one of the valuable fibers in textile industry. It is used for delicate applications in many areas such as
sarees, suitings, curtains and luxurious interiors. To diversify the properties and usages silk is mixed with poly-
ester and lyocell. The fabric is dyed with natural dyes (kum kum, indigo, barberry) as well as synthetic dyes
(reactive dye (H), reactive dye (M) and sulphur dye). This mixed fabric is compared with 100% silk for some
of the basic properties like absorbency, water retention, wicking, water vapour permeability, air permeability,
K/S values, colour fastness and antimicrobial property. The silk mixed fabric gives the appreciable results
with the 100% silk fabric.
Key words: Silk, lyocell, wicking, air permeability, antimicrobial
____________________________________________________________________________________
1. INTRODUCTION
Silk is a natural fibrous polymer consisting of amino acids. Silk fibers consist of 97% protein - fibroin, a
filamentous protein (approximately 75%) and sericin, a non-filamentous protein (nearly 25%). Fibroin forms
the inner layer or the core of the fibers, which is insoluble in hot water. It is having the chemical formulae
C15H26N5O6. The sericin, which forms the outer layer, is a form of gum having the chemical formulae
C15H23N5O6 [1, 2]. Unlike all other natural organic fibers like cotton, flax & wool, silk does not have a cellu-
lar structure. The smoothness and translucence shown by the degummed silk is related to its different extents
of surface reflections, internal transmitted light, internal reflected light and diffused light. It is highly hygro-
scopic, elastic, strong and gives good warmth and excellent drapeability [3, 4,5]. Silkfabricis famous for its soft
handle, gloss, fineness, higher strength, high wearing comfort, appearance and other desirable aesthetics used
for luxurious fashionable apparel, interior decorations. Hence, silk is rightly called “Queen” of textile fibers
[6,7,8].
Lyocell fibers may be defined as cellulosic fibers that are produced by regenerating cellulose into fiber
form out of a solution in N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMMO) [9]. Solvent spun lyocell fibers consist of
crystalline cellulose-II and amorphous cellulose, and have a higher degree of crystallinity (80%) in comparison
with other regenerated cellulosic fibers, such as modal (49%) and viscose (41%) [10].The lyocell fibers, like
other cellulosics, are moisture absorbent and biodegradable. They have a dry strength higher than other cellulo-
sics and approaching that of polyester. They also retain 85% of their strength when wet. Under certain condi-
tions lyocell fibers fibrillate which enables fabrics to be developed with interesting aesthetics. Non- fibrillating
versions are also available. Lyocell fibers are mostly used for apparel fabrics, especially outerwear, but it has
been shown that, due to the fibrillating property some very interesting nonwoven fabrics can be made as well
[11]. Poly(ethylene terephthalate) fiber is widely used in production of garments because of their low produc-
tion cost and good fiber properties such as mechanical strength, high stability against heat and chemicals and
wash and wear properties [12]. Fabrics woven or knitted from polyester thread or yarn are used extensively in
apparel and home furnishings, from shirts and pants to jackets and hats, bed sheets, blankets, upholstered furni-
ture and computer mouse mats. Polyester fabrics can provide specific advantages over natural fabrics, such as
improved wrinkle resistance, durability and high color retention [13]. As a result, polyester fibers are some-
times spun together with natural fibers to produce a cloth with blended properties [14]. The present study fo-
cused on the development of silk mixed fabric (silk (warp)and lyocell & polyester (weft)).
Corresponding Author: Jeyakodi Moses Jeyaraj Received on: 12/02/2015 Accepted on: 12/05/2015
10.1590/S1517-707620150004.0097

JEYARAJ, J.M., MARIAPPAN, A., VELLINGIRI, K. revista Matéria, v. 20, n. 4, pp. 924 – 935, 2015.
The fabrics were dyed using natural dyes (indigo, kum kum & barberry) and synthetic dyes (reactive (M),
reactive (H) & sulphur). The use of natural dyes on textile material has become very much popular throughout
the world due to its eco-friendliness, ancient heritage and aesthetic approach. Since 1990, many researchers
have been making enormous efforts to search new sources and different methods of applications with natural
dyes [15]. For instance, natural kum kum powder, is traditionally made by mixing turmeric (Curcuma longa)
collected from the rhizomes and lime. The dyed fabrics were subjected to different tests such as absorbency,
water retention, wicking, water vapour permeability, air permeability, K/S values, colour fastness and antimi-
crobial property.
The results obtained are in appreciable manner particularly for sarees relevant with 100% silk.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Materials
The two types of fabrics (1. 100% silk (both warp & weft) and 2. Silk (warp 100%) and 50% lyocell and 50%
polyester (weft) mixed fabrics) were used as mentioned in the following Table 1.
Tabela 1: Fabric details
S. No. Parameters 100% Silk 50% Silk+ (25% polyester and 25% lyocell)
1 Warp Count 2/80s
Silk : 2/80s
2 Weft Count 2/80s Polyester and Lyocell (50 : 50) : 2/80s
3 Ends / Inch 100 100
4 Picks / Inch 60 68
5 GSM 95 101
6 Cloth Width (Inch) 44 44
Natural dyes (kum kum, indigo, barberry) and synthetic dyes (reactive dye (M), reactive dye (H) and
sulphur dye) used were in the commercial grade. The chemicals and auxiliaries mentioned elsewhere for this
study were in AR grade
2.2 Methods
2.2.1 Pretreatment on silk and its mixed fabric
The above mentioned (2.1) materials were treated with 10 gpl hydrochloric acid for 60 minutes in a suitable
separate baths with material to liquor ratio 1:30 at 30o
C to get rid of the substrates added during weaving.
2.2.2 Dyeing of silk and its mixed fabric
The silk and its mixed fabric were dyed with natural (10 gpl, material to liquor ration, 1 : 30, temperature
95oC, and time 2 hours) (indigo, kum kum & barberry) and synthetic (2% on weight of fabric, material to
liquor ratio 1 : 20, temperature 95oC, and time 2 hours) (reactive dye (M), reactive dye (H) and sulphur dye)
dyes as per the established technique. The dyed samples were washed, soaped and dried [16, 17].
2.2.3 Absorbency of silk and its mixed fabric
Absorbency is the time taken for a water drop to penetrate into the textile material. The wettability of silk and
its mixed fabric was determined as per AATCC test method 79-2010. [18].
2.2.4 Water retention in silk and its mixed fabric
Water retaining capacity of silk and its mixed fabric was measured by standard AATCC 21-1978 test method
[19]. Absorptive capacity provides a measure of the amount of liquid held within a test specimen after speci-
fied times of immersion and drainage. The fabric samples were left immersed in water for twenty minutes. The
925

samples were removed from water and allowed to drain for 10 seconds prior to weighing. The water absorptive
capacity or water retention is given as percentage of the original mass of the fabric sample.
Water retention = (B – A )×100
A
Where, A= fabric weight before immersion (g)
and B= fabric weight after immersion (g)
2.2.5 Wicking behaviour of silk and its mixed fabric
The wicking height of the silk and its mixed fabric was determined [20]. Fabric samples measuring 10 cm ⅹ
2.5 cm were taken. Each of the sample pieces was clamped to a scale and held at a position such that the tip of
the sample just touched the water taken in a beaker. 1% reactive dye (Reactive Red M8B, CI No.: Reactive
Red 11) was added for tracking the movement of water. The height of water reached after five minutes was
measured [21].
2.2.6 Water vapour permeability of silk and its mixed fabric
Water vapour permeability (WVP) is the speed or rate at which moisture vapor moves through a fabric. The
ASTM E96-2000, moisture vapor test (open cup test) was used for measuring the WVP rate of the silk and its
mixed fabric [22]. The ASTM E96 test is used for measuring the water vapour permeability which is the speed
or rate at which the water vapor moves through a fabric.The rate of water vapor that passes through the fabric
was determined by reduction in the height of water in the cup. Water was poured into cups upto 6 cm from
base level. The cups were marked for every 0.5mm. The fabric samples were placed tightly on top of the cups
where the water, the air above the water, and the room environment were at the same temperature and pressure.
After 48 hours the level of water decreased in the cups and the reduction in height of water was noted
down.The moisture vapor transfer rate is the difference between the initial height of water and the actual height
of water in the cups.The water vapor transport properties of textile materials are of considerable importance in
determining the comfort properties of clothing systems. Water vapor transport through porous textiles may
occur due to both diffusion (driven by vapor concentration differences) and convection (driven by gas pressure
differences).
2.2.7 Air Permeability of silk and its mixed fabric
ASTM–D737-2012 method was used for measuring the air permeability of silk fabrics. This test gave the rate
of airflow through a material under a differential pressure between the two faces of a fabric [23]. Air permea-
bility is the rate of air flow passing perpendicularly through a known area under a prescribed air pressure dif-
ferential between the two surfaces of a material. Air permeability is an important factor in the performance of
textile materials such as gas filters, fabrics for air bags, clothing, mosquito netting, parachutes, sails, tent age
and vacuum cleaners. Air permeability also can be used to provide an indication of the breathability of weath-
er resistant and rain proof fabrics, or of coated fabrics in general, and to detect changes during the manufactur-
ing process.Air permeability test gives the rate of airflow through a material under a differential pressure be-
tween the two faces of a fabric. It is expressed as the quantity of air in cubic centimeter passing per second
through a square centimeter of the fabric.
2.2.8 Measurement of K/S value on dyed silk and its mixed fabric
Colour intensities of the dyed silk and its mixed fabric were measured using spectrophotometer (model: Prem-
ier colour scan ss 5000 A) within the range of 400-700 nm. Reflectance values were measured and the relative
colour strength (K/S) was calculated using Kubelka Munk equation [24] (K/S) defines a relationship between
spectral reflectance (R) of sample and its absorption (K) and scattering (S) characteristics. K/S = {(1-R)2
/2R}.
2.2.9 Wash fastness on dyed silk and its mixed fabric
The wash fastness of the dyed silk and its mixed fabric was determined by IS 764-test 3-1979 method [25].
The fabrics (10×4 cm) were sewed along all four edges with same size of multi-fiber fabric. The com-
posite specimen was washed at 60ºC for 30 minutes using detergent solution 5 g/l maintaining fabric to liquor
ratio at 1‫׃‬ 50. The change in colour of the specimen and staining of the adjacent fabric were assessed by grey
926

scale. The results were assessed in ratings from grade 1 (much altered) to grade 5 (unaltered) for change in
colour of the specimen. The staining of the adjacent fabric was assessed in raings from grade 1 (much stain-
ing) to grade 5 (no staining).
2.2.10 Light fastness on dyed silk and its mixed fabric
The light fastness of the dyed silk and its mixed fabric was determined by AATCC test method 16E-2004 [26].
These dyed fabrics were exposed separately for 10 hours under artificial light source- xenon arc lamp.
2.2.11 Fastness to rubbing on dyed silk and its mixed fabric
Colour fastness to crocking was determined by AATCC test method 8-2007 [27]. AATCC standardized
crockmeter was used to determine the rubbing fastness of dyed fabrics under wet and dry conditions to assess
the staining property.
2.2.12 Antibacterial property of dyed silk and its mixed fabric
The antibacterial activity on the dyed fabric samples was assessed qualitatively according to the AATCC test
method 147-2004 by the parallel streak method [28].
3. RESULTS
3.1 Absorbency of silk and its mixed fabric
The values of the absorbency of 100% silk and its mixed fabric dyed with indigo, kum kum, barberry, reactive
dye (M), reactive dye (H) and sulphur dye are given in the Table 2.
Table 2: Absorbency of silk and its mixed fabric
3.2 Water retention in silk and its mixed fabric
The data of the water retention of silk and its mixed fabric are given in Table 3.
S. No. Dyes
Drop Absorbency (Seconds)
100%
Silk
50% Silk+ (25% polyester and
25% lyocell)
1 Indigo 26.1 15.2
2 Kum kum 25.1 14.7
3 Barberry 25.3 14.9
4 Reactive (M) 24.9 13.8
5 Reactive dye (H) 24.7 13.5
6 Sulphur dye 26.7 15. 9
Mean 25.47 14.67
Standard Deviation 0.7737 0.8914
Variance 0.5987 0.7947
927

Table 3: Water retention in silk and its mixed fabric
3.3 Wicking behaviour of silk and its mixed fabric
The values of the wicking behaviour of silk and its mixed fabric dyed with indigo, kum kum, barberry, reactive
dye (M), reactive dye (H) and sulphur dye are given in Table 4.
Table 4: Wicking behaviour of silk and its mixed fabric
3.4 Water vapour permeability of silk and its mixed fabric
The data of water vapour permeability of silk and its mixed fabric dyed with indigo, kum kum, barberry, reac-
tive dye (M), reactive dye (H) and sulphur dye are given in the Table 5.
S. No. Dyes
Water retention (%)
100%
Silk
50% Silk+ (25% polyester
and 25% lyocell)
1 Indigo 318 345
2 Kum kum 321 348
3 Barberry 320 347
4 Reactive (M) 323 349
5 Reactive dye (H) 324 351
6 Sulphur dye 317 343
Mean 320.5 347.17
Variance 7.5 8.17
S. No. Dyes
Wicking (cm) [for 60 minutes]
100%
Silk
and 25% lyocell)
1 Indigo 13.7 15.2
2 Kum kum 13.9 15.5
3 Barberry 13.8 15.3
4 Reactive (M) 14.0 15.6
6 Sulphur dye 13.6 15.1
Mean 13.85 15.42
Variance 0.035 0.0697
928

Table 5: Water vapour permeability of silk and its mixed fabric
3.5 Air Permeabilityof silk and its mixed fabric
The values of air permeability of silk and its mixed fabric dyed with indigo, kum kum, barberry, reactive dye
(M), reactive dye (H) and sulphur dye are given in the Table 6.
Table 6: Air permeability of silk and its mixed fabric
3.6 K/S values of dyed silk and its mixed fabric
The colorimetric data of indigo, kum kum, barberry, reactive dye (M), reactive dye (H) and sulphur dyes ap-
plied on silk and its mixed fabric are given in Table 7.
S. No. Dyes
Water Vapour permeability (g/m2
/day)
100%
Silk
25% lyocell)
1 Indigo 1838 2031
2 Kum kum 1843 2036
3 Barberry 1840 2034
4 Reactive (M) 1846 .2038
5 Reactive dye (H) 1847 2040
6 Sulphur dye 1835 2029
Mean 1841.5 2034.67
Variance 21.9 17.47
S. No. Dyes
Air Permeability l/min
100%
Silk
25% lyocell)
1 Indigo 55.8 110.2
2 Kum kum 54.1 109.8
3 Barberry 55.8 108.8
4 Reactive (M) 55.1 108.3
6 Sulphur dye 55.0 109.3
Mean 55.0 109.32
Variance 0.548 0.4697
929

Table 7: K/S values of dyed of silk and its mixed fabric.
3.7 Fastness properties of dyed silk and its mixed fabric
The fastness properties (wash, light and rubbing) of natural (indigo, kum kum and barberry) and synthetic
(reactive dye (M), reactive dye (H) and sulphur) dyes applied on silk and its mixed fabric are given in Table 8.
Table 8: Fastness properties of dyed silk and its mixed fabric dyed with natural and synthetic dyes.
S.
No.
Dyes
Fastness properties of reactive dyed silk and its mixed fabric
100% Silk 50% Silk+ (25% polyester and 25% lyocell)
Wash Light
Rubbing
Wash Light
Rubbing
Dry Wet Dry Wet
1 Indigo 4 4 2 1-2 4 4 2 1-2
2 Kum kum 3 3 3 1-2 3-4 2-3 2-3 1
3 Barberry 3 3 2-3 1-2 3 3 2-3 1-2
4 Reactive Dye (M) 3-4 3-4 3 2 3 3-4 2-3 1-2
5 Reactive Dye (H) 3-4 3-4 3 1-2 3-4 3-4 2-3 1-2
6 Sulphur Dye 4 4 2 1-2 4 4 2 1-2
Mean 3-4 3-4 2-3 1-2 3-4 3-4 2-3 1-2
Standard Deviation 0.4472 0.4472 0.4916 0.2041 0.4472 0.5845 0.2582 0.2041
Variance 0.2 0.2 0.2417 0.0417 0.2 0.3417 0.0667 0.0417
3.8. Antimicrobial property of dyed silk and its mixed fabric
The data of antibacterial property of silk and its mixed fabris dyed with indigo, kum kum, barberry, reactive
dye (M), reactive dye (H) and sulphur dye for Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli are given in Table 9.
S.
No.
Colorimetric data of silk and its mixed fabric
Dyes 100% Silk 50% Silk+ (25% polyester and 25% lyocell)
L* a* b* C h° K/S L* a* b* C h° K/S
1 Indigo 26.20 -6.06 -14.41 23.10 262 14.01 37.91 -6.15 -15.30 21.62 251 14.60
2 Kum kum 27.71 -5.84 -15.95 23.51 251 13.70 31.04 -5.98 -15.52 22.02 255 14.50
3 Barberry 29.54 -5.96 -14.24 22.95 262 13.95 32.06 -5.30 -15.08 21.59 251 14.54
4 Reactive
Dye (M)
36.80 -4.65 -16.84 23.01 256 14.30 27.42 -5.30 -14.87 22.14 265 14.84
4 Reactive
Dye (H)
36.50 -6.95 -16.62 22.87 253 14.42 35.26 -4.32 -15.15 23.54 241 14.87
6 Sulphur
Dye
28.65 -4.75 -16.16 23.54 246 14.21 33.32 -4.62 -15.18 23.95 268 14.65
Mean 14.1 Mean 14.67
Standard Deviation 0.262
7
Standard Deviation 0.154
9
Variance 0.069
0
Variance 0.024
930

Table 9: Antimicrobial property of dyed silk and its mixed fabric
S.No.
Dyes
Antibacterial activity (Zone of Bacteriostasis – mm)
Staphylococcus aureus Escherichia coli
100%
Silk
and 25% lyocell)
100%
Silk
and 25% lyocell)
1 Indigo 39 42 36 38
2 Kum kum 36 40 33 36
3 Barberry 36 39 33 35
4 Reactive dye (M) 37 42 34 37
5 Reactive dye (H) 38 42 35 38
6 Sulphur dye 39 43 36 39
Mean 37.5 41.33 34.5 37.17
Standard Deviation 1.38 1.51 1.38 1.47
Variance 1.9 2.27 1.9 2.17
4. DISCUSSIONS
4.1 Absorbency of silk and its mixed fabric
From Table 2 it is observed that there is a good absorbency in both the type of fabrics, however the mixed
fabrics completes the absorption in less time. The reactive dyed (H) materials show the maximum absorbency
followed by reactive dyed (M), kum kum dyed, barberry dyed, indigo dyed, and sulphur dyed textiles. Though
the mixed fabric contains polyester which is known for its high hydrophobic character, the absorption behav-
iour is still high compared with the 100% silk fabric. The presence of lyocell increases the absorption behav-
iour of the mixed fabric, as lyocell is highly hydrophilic [10, 11] contrast to the hydrophobic polyester. The
absorbency character of lyocell is similar to that of cotton due to their presence of cellulosic polymer through-
out the fiber arrangement. From the Table 2 it is seen that the mixed fabric fulfills the absorption behaviour in
nearly 50% of reduced time compared to that of 100% silk fabric. The textile materials (silk and its mixed
fabric) dyed with soluble dyes (both natural (kum kum and barberry) and synthetic (Reactive H & M) ) show
more absorbency than that of insoluble dyes (Indigo and Sulphur).
4.2 Water retention in silk and its mixed fabric
Table 3 reveals that the water retention behaviour is due to the presence of hydrophilic groups present in the
polymers of the selected fabrics. The amount of water retained by a fiber mass increases with an increase in the
hydrophilic tendency of the fiber. In the mixed fabric, in addition to silk, the fabric also has the presence of
lyocell fiber which enhances the water attraction thereby leading for more water retention in the material.
From the Table 3, it is observed that the mixed fabric gives nearly 10% more water retention values
compared with the 100% silk fabric. The reactive dyed (H) materials show the maximum water retency fol-
lowed by reactive dyed (M), kum kum dyed, barberry dyed, indigo dyed, and sulphur dyed textiles. The in-
creased water retention values in the mixed fabrics is due to the presence of lyocell which increases the absorp-
tion behaviour of the mixed fabric, as lyocell is highly hydrophilic [10, 11].
4.3 Wicking behaviour of silk and its mixed fabric
Table 4 shows that the wicking values are good in both the type of fabrics, however the mixed fabrics show the
more wicking behaviour compared to the 100% silk fabric. The reactive dyed (H) materials show the maxi-
mum wicking followed by reactive dyed (M), kum kum dyed, barberry dyed, indigo dyed, and sulphur dyed
textiles. This trend is common in both 100% silk and its mixed [silk (warp), polyester & lyocell (weft – 50:
50)] fabrics. The wicking character is more for these materials dyed with soluble dyes (both natural (kum kum
and barberry) and synthetic (Reactive H & M) ) than that of insoluble dyes (Indigo and Sulphur). Wicking is
the ability of a liquid to flow in narrow spaces without the assistance of external forces like gravity. As the
mixed fabric contains lyocell with good absorbency behaviour, the wicking is also increased correspondingly.
The wicking behaviour of mixed fabric is nearly 15% more than that of the 100% silk fabric. This may
be due to the presence of attractive groups present in lyocell polymers of mixed fabric.
931

4.4 Water vapour permeability of silk and its mixed fabric
From the Table 5 it is clearly seen that the silk and its mixed fabric dyed with indigo, kum kum, barberry, reac-
tive dye (M), reactive dye (H) and sulphur dye give good values of water vapour permeability. However, the
silk mixed fabric gives high values than the 100% silk fabric due to the presence of good hydrophilic lyocell
material. The water vapour permeability is due to the property of a material which permits the passage of
water vapour through it, and the time rate of water vapour transmission through a unit area of flat materials of
unit thickness induced by a unit vapor pressure difference between two specific surfaces under specified tem-
perature and humidity conditions.
4.5 Air Permeabilityof silk and its mixed fabric
It is seen from the Table 6 that the silk mixed fabric dyed with indigo, kum kum, barberry, reactive dye (M),
reactive dye (H) and sulphur dye gives excellent air permeability behaviour compared with the corresponding
100% silk fabric. The average air permeability value of silk mixed fabric is 109.3 while that for silk fabric is
55.0 only. There is nearly a one fold increase in the air permeability value of silk mixed fabric compared with
that of 100% silk fabric. This increase may be due to the physical structure of plain fabrics (as shown in Table
1) that the mixied fabric has more picks / inch than 100% silk fabric (68 versus 60). Thus the mixed fabric has
a larger number of interstices between the weft yarns than that of the 100% silk fabric. This may allow a great-
er air flow into this fabric.
4.6 K/S values of dyed silk and its mixed fabric
It is seen from Table 7 that the silk and its mixed fabric dyed with indigo, kum kum, barberry, reactive dye
(M), reactive dye (H) and sulphur dye show good colour values. The final K/S vlaues are in accordance to the
color corodinates of CIELab and CIELch. The average K/S value for the silk mixed fabric dyed with indigo,
kum kum, barberry, reactive dye (M), reactive dye (H) and sulphur dye is 14.67 whereas this value is less for
100% silk fabric (around 14.1). The k/s value on silk mixed fabrics for reactive dyes (M & H) is around 14.85
followed by 14.65 (sulphur dye), 14.60 (Indigo), 14.54 (barberry), and 14.50 (kum kum) respectively. The
100% silk fabric also follows the same trend of colorimetric data, such as, for reactive dyes (M &H) around
14.36 followed by 14.21 (sulphur dye), 14.01(Indigo), 13.95 (barberry), and 13.70 (kum kum) respectively.
From this table it is seen that both the type of fabrics show good values indicating good dyeing. The
difference in the k/s values between the two type of fabrics is only marginal. The reason for good dyeing and
k/s values is being the reaction between the reactive dye and reactive site of the polymers in the fabric materi-
als. The silk polymer contains multiple functional groups like –OH, -SO3H, -COOH, -C6H5OH, -NH2. Like-
wise in lyocell the reactive group –OH is present throughout the polymeric chain. These reactive groups are
responsible for the good dyeing and k/s values in silk and silk mixed fabrics. The k/s value around 12 and more
than 12 is considered to be good colour strength. Hence, the colorimetric data on 100% silk and its mixed
fabrics dyed using indigo, kum kum, bar berry, reactive dye (M), reactive dye (H) and sulphur dye are in the
accepted value.
4.7 Fastness properties of dyed silk and its mixed fabric
The wash fastness of the dyed silk materials is good as compared with other fatnesses like light and rubbing
fastness properties as revealed in Table 8. The good wash fastness property is due to the strong reaction be-
tween the reactive groups of the polymer in the fabric materials and also of the dye. It is obvious that the light
fastness and rubbing fastness properties are moderately less considered to wash fastness property due to their
behaviour towards these applications.
4.8 Antimicrobial property of dyed silk and its mixed fabric
The antimicrobial activity of the silk and its mixed fabric dyed with indigo, kum kum, barberry, reactive dye
(M), reactive dye (H) and sulphur dye was assessed by qualitative test method. All these dyed samples showed
a higher zone of inhibition against Staphylococcus aureus when compared to Escherichia coli as seen in Table
9. In general, the silk mixed fabric shows a higher zone of inhibition (both by Staphylococcus aureus and
Escherichia coli) over 100% silk fabric. The sulphur dye shows maximum inhibition followed by reactive (H)
& reactive (M) dyes respectively in synthetic dye category whereas indigo gives maximum inhibition followed
by kum kum and barberry in the natural dye category on these fabrics exhibited by staphylococcus aureus and
escherichia coli.
932

5. CONCLUSIONS
From this research work on 100% silk and silk mixed fabric dyed with natural dyes (indigo, kum kum & bar-
berry) and synthetic dyes (reactive (M), reactive (H) & sulphur), the following conclusions are arrived;
The absorbency is good in both the 100% silk fabric and silk mixed fabric. However the mixed fabric
gives increased absorption than the 100% silk fabric. The water retention character is more in the silk mixed
fabric than the 100% silk fabric. As the absorption and water retention behaviour are more, obviously the wick-
ing value is also good in both the type of fabrics, however the mixed fabrics show more wicking behaviour
compared to the 100% silk fabric. The silk and its mixed fabric give good values of water vapour permeability
and air permeability. However due to the presence of lyocell in the mixed fabric which facilitates the increase
of these behaviors. The k/s values and the fastness properties (wash, light and rubbing) are mostly similar in
both the 100% silk fabric and silk mixed fabric. The overall fastness property is more for washing compared
with the corresponding light and rubbing. The antimicrobial character of silk mixed fabric dyed with both
natural dye (indigo, kum kum & barberry) and synthetic dye (reactive (M & H) and sulphur) is good when
compared with the corresponding 100% silk fabric.
6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank the Management and Principal, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore for given
the permission and providing the necessary infrastructure. The authors also thank The Head, Department of
Applied Science; and Head, Department of Fashion Technology, PSG CT for the kind help rendered in the
completion of this work. Thanks are also due to The Under Secretary (FD – III), University Grants Commis-
sion, New Delhi 110 002 for sanctioning the project (Lr. No. : 39-783/2010 (SR), Dt.: 07.01.2011).
7. BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] HOJO, N., “Structure of Silk Yarn - part B”: Chemical structure and processing of silk yarn, Science Pub-
lishers, Inc, Enfield, USA, pp. 135-157, 2000
[2] SHEIKH, M.R.K., FAROUQUI, F.I., MODAK, P.R., et al., “Dyeing of Rajshahi silk with basic dyes:
Effect of modification on dyeing Properties”, Journal of the Textile Institute, v. 97, n.4, pp. 295-300, 2006
[3] AGARWAL, D., SEN, K., GULRAJANI, M.L., “Dyeing of silk with bifunctional reactive dyes: The rela-
tionship between exhaustion and fixation”, Journal of the Society of Dyers and Colourists, v. 113, n. 5-6,
pp. 174-178, 1997
[4] ZUWANG, W., “Recent developments of reactive dyes and reactive dyeing of silk”, Review of Progress
in Coloration and Related Topics, v. 28, n. 1, pp. 32-38, 1998
[5] OSMAN, E.M., MICHAEL, M.N., GOHAR, H., “The Effect of Both UVOzone and Chitosan on Natural
Fabrics”, International Journal of Chemistry, v. 2, n. 2, pp. 28-39, 2010
[6] IRIYAMA, Y., MOCHIZUKI, T., et al., “Plasma treatment of silk Fabrics for better dyeability”, Journal
of Photopolymer Science and Technology, v. 15, n. 2, pp. 299-306, 2002
[7] KHANCHAIYAPOOM, K., PRACHAYAWARAKORN, J.,“Physical and Dyeing Properties Using Natu-
ral Dyes of Degummed Silks (Bombyx mori)Graftedby2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate”, Journal of Metals,
Materials and Minerals, v. 18, n. 2, pp. 237-240, 2008
[8] PRACHAYAWARAKORN, J., KHANCHAIYAPOOM, K., “Dyeing Properties of Bombyx mori Silks
Grafted by 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate (HEMA)”, Fibers and Polymers, v. 11, n. 5, pp. 1010-1017, 2010
[9] ALBRECHT, W., REINTJES, M., WULFHORST, B., “Lyocell fibers”, Chemical Fibers International, v.
47, n. 5, pp. 298-304, 1997
[10] COLOM, X., CARRILLO, F., “Crystallinity changes in lyocell and viscose-type fibers by caustic treat-
ment”, European Polymer Journal, v. 38, n. 11, pp. 2225-2230, 2002
[11] SIROKY, J., BLACKBURN, R.S., BECHTOLD, T., et al., “Attenuated total reflectance Fourier-
transform Infrared spectroscopy analysis of crystallinity changes in lyocell following continuous treatment
with sodium hydroxide”,Cellulose, v. 17, n. 1, pp. 103-115, 2010
[12] RAO, M.V.S., TALELE, A.B., A Guide to Crimping/Texturing Technology, MANTRA, Man Made Tex-
tiles Research Association, Surat, India, 1992
933

[13] ALISH-MARK, M., HERRMANN, A., ZIMMERMANN, W., “Increase of the hydrophilicity of polyeth-
ylene terephthalate fibers by hydrolases from Thermomonospora fusca and Fusarium solani f. sp. Pisi”, Bio-
technology Letters, v. 28, n. 10, pp. 681-685, 2006
[14] BAL, S., BEHERA, R.C., “Structural investigation of chemical treated polyester fibers using SAXS and
other techniques”, Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, v. 5, n. 2, pp. 179-
198, 2006
[15] GULRAJANI, M.L., GUPTA, D., Natural Dyes and their Application to Textiles, Indian Institute of
Technology Delhi Publication, New Delhi, 1992
[16] TROTMAN, E.R., Dyeing and Chemical Technology of Textile Fibers, 6th edition, Edward Arnold,
London, 1984
[17] SHENAI, V.A., Technology of Dyeing, Sevak Publications, Mumbai, India, 1977
[18] AATCC Test Method 79-2010, Absorbency of Textiles, Technical Manual of the AATCC, American
Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, Research Triangle Park, USA, 2010
[19] AATCC Test Method 21-1978, Static Absorption Test, Technical Manual of the AATCC, American
Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, Research Triangle Park, USA, 1979
[20] TYAGI, G.K., KRISHNA, G., et al., “Comfort aspects of finished polyester-cotton and polyester-viscose
ring and MJS yarn fabrics”, Indian Journal of Fiber & Textile Research, v. 34, n. 2, pp. 137-143, 2009
[21] SWARNA, N., JEYAKODI MOSES, J., “Surface Modification of Polyester Fabric using Polyvinyl
Alcohol in Alkaline Medium”, Indian Journal of Fiber & Textile Research, v. 37, n. 3, pp. 287-291, 2012
[22] ASTM – E96, Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials, ASTM International,
West Conshohocken, USA, 2000
[23] ASTM – D737, Standard Test Methods for Air Permeability of Textile Fabrics, ASTM International, West
Conshohocken, USA, 2012
[24] PETERS, R.H., The Physical Chemistry of Dyeing, Textile Chemistry, Elsevier Scientific Publications
Company, Amsterdam, 1975
[25] BIS Test Method IS:764-1979, Test 3, Indian Standard Method for Determination of Colour Fastness of
Textile Materials to Washing, Bureau of Indian Standards, 1979
[26] AATCC Test Method 16E-2004, Colour Fastness to Light, Technical Manual of the AATCC, Research
Triangle Park, U.S.A, 2004
[27] AATCC Test Method 8-2007, Colour Fastness to Crocking, Technical Manual of the AATCC, Research
Triangle Park, U.S.A, 2007
[28] AATCC Test Method 147-2004. Antibacterial Activity Assessment of Textile Materials–Parallel Streak
Method, Technical Manual of the AATCC, Research Triangle Park, USA, 2004
934

Plate -I): View of the commercially produced 100% Silk fabric
Plate -II): View of the commercially produced Silk mixed (Polyester & Lyocell) fabric
935

A study on the functional properties of silk and polyester lyocell mixed fabric

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to A study on the functional properties of silk and polyester lyocell mixed fabric

More from Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Recently uploaded

A study on the functional properties of silk and polyester lyocell mixed fabric