1
© CDISC 2014
Angelo Tinazzi, Cytel Inc,
Geneva, Switzerland
2
Therapeutic Area Standards –
Reflections on Oncology standards and
what is needed in the future
Geneva Branch
© CDISC 2014 3
Apply CDISC to Oncology Studies –
Common Questions/Issues/Debates
© CDISC 2014
4
Apply CDISC to Oncology Studies
Two sponsors two interpretations
Response to prior oncology therapies
Sponsor A Sponsor B
CMRELRECZR
CMSUPPCM
© CDISC 2014 5
How CDISC currently fulfill
Oncology TA requirements?
 SDTM IG 3.1.3 incorporates 3 new oncology (TU/TR/RS)
specific domains for efficacy tumour response assessment
• Overcoming Difficulties in Implementing RECIST criteria, PhUSE 2013, G. Ruhnke
• CDISC Journey on Solid Tumor Studies using RECIST 1.1., PhUSE 2013, K. Lee
 SDTM QS-ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Performance Status (ECOG)
 Other oncology specific variables e.g. NCI-CTCAE Lab Criteria
(LB.LBTOXGR)
 SDTM IG 3.2 contains new domains that perfectly fit with Oncology
TA requirements:
 SS for Survival Status Update and DD for Death Details, PR for
common oncology interventions e.g. surgery or radiotherapy, TD for
protocol where disease assessment schedule do not match the
“regular” study schedule e.g. tumor response, EC/EX for exposure
data planned vs actual
© CDISC 2014 6
CDISC Onco TA in the future?
Some Examples
• More clarifications in Trial Design
 Unlimited number of cycles
 Treatment Schedule vs Efficacy Assessment Schedule
 Cancer History
 MH + SUPPMH + SC or ad hoc-domain
 Prior and Follow-up Cancer Therapies
 In CM (CMCAT/CMSCAT) or ad-hoc domain
• Exposure
 Treatment modification
• Adverse Events
 Action Taken / Drug Relationship in drug combination trials
• Efficacy
 More guidance on non-solid tumor response assessment
• More Terminology
© CDISC 2014 77
Questions

Therapeutic Area Standards: Reflections on Oncology Standards and What is Needed in the Future presented by Angelo Tinazzi @ CDISC Europe Interchange 2014]

  • 1.
  • 2.
    © CDISC 2014 AngeloTinazzi, Cytel Inc, Geneva, Switzerland 2 Therapeutic Area Standards – Reflections on Oncology standards and what is needed in the future Geneva Branch
  • 3.
    © CDISC 20143 Apply CDISC to Oncology Studies – Common Questions/Issues/Debates
  • 4.
    © CDISC 2014 4 ApplyCDISC to Oncology Studies Two sponsors two interpretations Response to prior oncology therapies Sponsor A Sponsor B CMRELRECZR CMSUPPCM
  • 5.
    © CDISC 20145 How CDISC currently fulfill Oncology TA requirements?  SDTM IG 3.1.3 incorporates 3 new oncology (TU/TR/RS) specific domains for efficacy tumour response assessment • Overcoming Difficulties in Implementing RECIST criteria, PhUSE 2013, G. Ruhnke • CDISC Journey on Solid Tumor Studies using RECIST 1.1., PhUSE 2013, K. Lee  SDTM QS-ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG)  Other oncology specific variables e.g. NCI-CTCAE Lab Criteria (LB.LBTOXGR)  SDTM IG 3.2 contains new domains that perfectly fit with Oncology TA requirements:  SS for Survival Status Update and DD for Death Details, PR for common oncology interventions e.g. surgery or radiotherapy, TD for protocol where disease assessment schedule do not match the “regular” study schedule e.g. tumor response, EC/EX for exposure data planned vs actual
  • 6.
    © CDISC 20146 CDISC Onco TA in the future? Some Examples • More clarifications in Trial Design  Unlimited number of cycles  Treatment Schedule vs Efficacy Assessment Schedule  Cancer History  MH + SUPPMH + SC or ad hoc-domain  Prior and Follow-up Cancer Therapies  In CM (CMCAT/CMSCAT) or ad-hoc domain • Exposure  Treatment modification • Adverse Events  Action Taken / Drug Relationship in drug combination trials • Efficacy  More guidance on non-solid tumor response assessment • More Terminology
  • 7.
    © CDISC 201477 Questions