Aberdeen talent acquisition report

Talent
Acquisition
Lifecycle
From Sourcing to Onboarding

compliments of

www.profilesinternational.com

The Talent Acquisition Lifecycle
From Sourcing to Onboarding

September 2011
Mollie Lombardi

The Talent Acquisition Lifecycle: From Sourcing to Onboarding
Page 2

Executive Summary
Hiring is an exercise in risk - did we find the right person, the right skills, Research Benchmark
the right fit? Talent acquisition is more than just posting a requisition and Aberdeen’s Research
making an offer. It is a series of sourcing activities, branding efforts, Benchmarks provide an
assessment processes, applicant tracking technologies, onboarding activities in-depth and comprehensive
and more - all designed to help an organization answer those key questions look into process, procedure,
and find top talent. Between January and August 2011, Aberdeen surveyed methodologies, and
506 organizations to better understand the top performing talent acquisition technologies with best practice
strategies, and uncover the mix of tools, strategies and best practices to identification and actionable
efficiently and effectively deliver top quality candidates to the business. recommendations

Best-in-Class Performance
Aberdeen used the following three key performance criteria to distinguish
Best-in-Class companies:
95% of first-year employees were retained
82% of employees hired in the last 12 months met first performance
milestones on time
16% year-over-year improvement in hiring manager satisfaction

Competitive Maturity Assessment
Organizations achieving Best-in-Class performance in hiring efforts shared
several common characteristics, including:
The ability to define the talent required by business needs in terms
of skills, behaviors and attributes
A culture of talent acquisition, where everyone views finding great
talent as part of their job
A focus on building relationships and talent pools around critical
roles that have the greatest impact on organizational performance

Required Actions
In addition to the specific recommendations in Chapter Three of this
report, to achieve Best-in-Class performance, companies must:
Know the important roles to their business, and put in place
strategies to build relationships with future generations of talent to
fill those roles
Make talent acquisition - from sourcing to interviewing to
onboarding - a part of the culture, to make sure the right talent
joins, stays and performs in the organization
Integrate data between hiring and other talent processes leveraging
that information to continually improve hiring practices

This document is the result of primary research performed by Aberdeen Group. Aberdeen Group's methodologies provide for Telephone: 617 854 5200
© 2011 Aberdeen Group. objective fact-based research and
represent the best analysis available at the time of publication. Unless otherwise noted, the entire contents of this publication are copyrighted617 723 7897
www.aberdeen.com Fax: by Aberdeen Group, Inc.
and may not be reproduced, distributed, archived, or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent by Aberdeen Group, Inc.

Page 3

Table of Contents
Executive Summary....................................................................................................... 2
Best-in-Class Performance ..................................................................................... 2
Competitive Maturity Assessment....................................................................... 2
Required Actions...................................................................................................... 2
Chapter One: Benchmarking the Best-in-Class .................................................... 4
Business Context ..................................................................................................... 4
The Maturity Class Framework ............................................................................ 5
The Best-in-Class PACE Model ............................................................................ 6
Best-in-Class Strategies........................................................................................... 6
Chapter Two: Benchmarking Requirements for Success .................................13
Competitive Assessment......................................................................................14
Capabilities and Enablers ......................................................................................15
Chapter Three: Required Actions .........................................................................21
Laggard Steps to Success ......................................................................................21
Industry Average Steps to Success ....................................................................21
Best-in-Class Steps to Success ............................................................................22
Appendix A: Research Methodology.....................................................................24
Appendix B: Related Aberdeen Research ............................................................26
Figures
Figure 1: Talent Acquisition Pressures..................................................................... 4
Figure 2: Top Strategic Actions ................................................................................. 7
Figure 3: Nature of Talent Acquisition Strategy .................................................... 8
Figure 4: Most Effective Sources for Candidates ................................................... 9
Figure 5: Performance on Key Metrics ..................................................................10
Figure 6: Performance Improvement on Key Metrics ........................................11
Figure 7: Barriers to Linking Hiring Source to Performance ............................12
Figure 8: Leadership Involvement in Onboarding................................................16
Figure 9: Impact of Identifying Critical Roles........................................................17
Figure 10: Employee Groups Screened Pre- and Post-Hire .............................18
Figure 11: Social Talent Acquisition Strategies ....................................................19
Figure 12: Most Common Mobile Recruiting Activities.....................................19
Tables
Table 1: Top Performers Earn Best-in-Class Status.............................................. 5
Table 2: The Best-in-Class PACE Framework ....................................................... 6
Table 3: Most Valuable Measures of Talent Acquisition Success.....................10
Table 4: The Competitive Framework...................................................................14
Table 5: The PACE Framework Key ......................................................................25
Table 6: The Competitive Framework Key ..........................................................25
Table 7: The Relationship Between PACE and the Competitive Framework ...25

© 2011 Aberdeen Group. Telephone: 617 854 5200
www.aberdeen.com Fax: 617 723 7897

Page 4

Chapter One:
Benchmarking the Best-in-Class
Business Context
No matter how big or small an organization is, hiring a new employee is an Fast Facts
important inflection point. Most hiring decisions are not made lightly, and Best-in-Class organizations
involve a significant investment in time and resources, from money spent on achieve
job advertising, time spent by recruiters and hiring managers, investments in Twice as many of their
assessments, screening, and onboarding - in addition to the energy spent by organizational goals over the
the candidate in the process. But the investment is justified when you look course of the year as all
at this new employee and see them contributing to the organization, watch others
them interacting with and inspiring colleagues, and helping the company
grow. Of course, not all hiring decisions are made equal, but what elements Five-times the
improvement in customer
make the difference between cultivating the ability to hire rock star
satisfaction as compared to
contributors and a string of expectation mismatches? As the data in this all others
report will show, it all comes down to one concept - knowing. Knowing
where the organization is headed, knowing the skills and behaviors required 9% reduction in cost-per-
to get there, knowing the culture, knowing what success in each job role hire, vs. no change among all
looks like, knowing where to find individuals who meet those needs, and others
knowing how to build relationships with them. The following chapters will
explore the strategies, tools and capabilities organizations are utilizing to
help them fine tune their recruiting processes to deliver more top
performing candidates.

The War Rages On
The phrase "war for talent" was coined in the mid 1990's by McKinsey &
Company, but the latest data shows that the war goes on (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Talent Acquisition Pressures

60% All Respondents
52%
49% 49%

40%

20%

%
Increas ing com petition Shortages of required Pres s ure to meet the
in the m arketplace for s kills available in the com pany’s growth
top talent labor pool objectives

Respondents indicated top three
Source: Aberdeen Group, August 2011


Page 5

If anything, the battle lines are more entrenched, with about half of all
organizations citing the same top three pressures influencing talent
acquisition efforts - competition for talent, shortages of talent, and the
growing need for talent. The companies that align themselves - that know
themselves well enough - to better find and attract the talent they need, will
be in position to win this war. But it's not about a general ability to find
talent, or woo candidates. It's about the specific ability to tap into the
pipeline of people with the right skills, right cultural fit, and right experience
to be successful in a particular organization. It's not about everyone needing
a pretty careers website, or a high-touch candidate experience, or a battery
of general assessment questions. It's about connecting on the right websites
or social media outlets, having a candidate experience that reflects the
culture, and asking the right questions and using the right assessments to
help determine fit.

The Maturity Class Framework
Aberdeen used three key performance criteria to distinguish the Best-in-
Class from Industry Average and Laggard organizations:
First year retention - measured as the percentage of hires that
stay with the organization through the first year, used as a measure
of fit. Whether voluntary or involuntary, churn in the first year
usually indicates some sort of mismatch.
Time to performance - measured as the percentage of new
employees that meet their first performance milestone on time,
used as a measure of how good the selection process is at matching
candidates to business needs.
Hiring manager satisfaction - measured as the year-over-year
change in hiring manager satisfaction with the employees that have
come into the firm, used as a measure of hiring process quality in
terms of stakeholder experience and outcomes.

Table 1: Top Performers Earn Best-in-Class Status
Definition of
Mean Class Performance
Maturity Class
Best-in-Class:
Top 20% 82% of employees hired in the last 12 months met
first performance milestones on time
of aggregate
performance scorers 16% year-over-year improvement in hiring manager
satisfaction
Industry Average:
33% of employees hired in the last 12 months met
Middle 50%
of aggregate
performance scorers 3% year-over-year improvement in hiring manager
satisfaction


Page 6

Definition of
Mean Class Performance
Maturity Class
Laggard:
20% of employees hired in the last 12 months met
Bottom 30%
of aggregate
performance scorers 1% year-over-year decrease in hiring manager
satisfaction

The Best-in-Class PACE Model
Achieving the kind of excellence demonstrated by Best-in-Class organization
is a combination of tools and capabilities that help define what top
performance looks like, filter against that success profile, and support
candidates through the hiring and onboarding process. These characteristics
are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2: The Best-in-Class PACE Framework
Pressures Actions Capabilities Enablers
Increasing Strengthen ability Hiring managers have visibility into External online job / career
competition to identify best fit candidate status the recruitment process portal
in the talent Core competencies (skills, knowledge, and Employee / candidate
marketplace Proactively build attributes) are defined background checking
for top talent candidate pipeline Clear accountability given to all Internal online job / career
Create a better stakeholders involved in onboarding portal
candidate process to ensure employee is ready to go Employee eligibility / verification
experience on day one solutions
Building a talent Job roles deemed most critical to Hiring management system
acquisition organizational success (i.e. the roles that Applicant tracking system (ATS)
culture have the greatest impact on revenue /
Employee referral tracking
profit) have been identified
tools
Localization of recruitment practices /
Pre-hire assessments
forms / technologies

Best-in-Class Strategies
When it comes to the strategies for achieving hiring excellence, finding ways to
understand which talent is "best fit" and most likely to succeed tops the list
(Figure 2). It is such an important element that it has risen to the top of the
list, up from second place in 2010. There are many elements to this kind of fit,
and Aberdeen's 2010 Talent Acquisition study found that the most prevalent
criteria by which organizations determine the fit of candidates were:
Team fit - feedback from immediate team on how well they believe
the candidate will fit in with the team’s culture
Assessment for demonstrated skills or competencies
Behavioral or attitude assessments

Page 7

Figure 2: Top Strategic Actions

50% Best-in-Class
43% Industry Average
41% 41%
35% 35% Laggard
34%
33% 31%
31%

25% 22% 22%
18%

%
Strengthen ability Proactively build Create a better Building a talent
to identify talent m candidate candidate acquis ition
os t likely to pipeline experience culture
succeed


Hiring decisions, like all talent decisions, are increasingly looking to support
gut feel with data to drive better outcomes. In Aberdeen's recent report on
Assessments, published in May 2011, the number one goal for assessment
use, cited by 70% of respondents, was to "improve business results through
better quality candidates." Assessments can play an important role in the
hiring process, and impact key metrics as well. According to the findings
from the May study, organizations using assessments saw 64% greater
improvement in hiring manager satisfaction (7.2% vs. 4.4%), were 10% more
likely to have new hires hit their first performance goals on time (44% vs.
40%) and saw 28% greater employee engagement (41% vs. 32%). These top
performing organizations also have capabilities in place, as we will see in
Chapter Two, to support the tools and strategies used to identify top talent,
but clearly, when fit is a top priority the results are significant.
The next most common strategy is to proactively build a candidate pipeline,
regardless of current hiring needs. In the past several talent acquisition
reports from Aberdeen we have quoted Lou Manzi, the former Vice
President, Global Talent Solutions, at GlaxoSmithKlein, when he stated at
Aberdeen's inaugural Human Capital Management summit that "hiring may
slow or stop, but talent acquisition never does." This statement rings as true
today as it ever has, and indeed, the Best-in-Class are 32% more likely than
all other companies (the Industry Average and Laggard companies
combined) to indicate that their hiring practices are continuous, as opposed
to reactive (Figure 3).


Page 8

Figure 3: Nature of Talent Acquisition Strategy
Fast Facts
60% Best-in-Class Industry Average Laggard
50% Best-in-Class organizations
48%
44%
achieve are 32% more
42% likely than all others to
40% 36% indicate that their hiring
33% practices are continuous, as
opposed to reactive

20%

%
Continuous - Identifying and Reactive - focus ed on im m ediate
cultivating relations hips with top hiring needs
pros pects is always a priority


This continuous focus is highly aligned with the last two strategies in Figure
2, which are also the most differentiated - improving the candidate
experience and creating a talent acquisition culture. When it comes to
improving candidate experience, Aberdeen's 2010 Talent Acquisition report
stated that:
Candidate relationship management is a critical piece, if not the critical piece, of
talent acquisition going forward. And while this may seem like a bold claim, the
evidence is more than abundant. And the pressures listed in this study make it
clear that organizations can't simply go out into the world and pick up quality
talent on a whim; skills are in short supply, and the competition is becoming
increasingly resourceful in attracting the people with those skills.
But how are these top-performers going about the process of engaging candidates
early-on? The top candidate relationship management activities as rated by Best-
in-Class organizations show how these companies value on a combination of
technology and proactive outreach from key stakeholders:
Maintaining an engaging and informative company career portal
Recruiters and hiring managers actively communicate with candidates via
phone calls or personal emails Fast Facts

Utilizing software (such as candidate relationship management or an Best-in-Class organizations
achieve are 55% more
applicant tracking system) to regularly track all candidate communications
likely than all others to
But the most differentiated strategy is around creating a talent acquisition indicate that building a
culture as a foundation for all of these strategies. Best-in-Class companies corporate culture where
are 55% more likely than all others to indicate that building a corporate everyone views talent
culture where everyone views talent acquisition as part of their job is acquisition as part of their
critical to success. This also lays the groundwork for an effective onboarding job is critical to success
process, one which involves all relevant stakeholders to ensure a new hire


Page 9

gets off to a strong start. Visibility into the process, along with a common
language with which to describe and evaluate talent, are both keys to
enabling this culture, as will be illustrated in Chapter Two. But as the old
saying goes, many hands make short work, and when it comes to sourcing
top talent, employee referrals still top the list by a wide margin (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Most Effective Sources for Candidates

4.5 Best-in-Class
4.2

4.0

3.5
3.3
3.1
3.0
3.0

2.5
Em ployee An eas y-to-us e Online job boards Social networking
referrals and and engaging sites
networks com pany career
portal


When everyone takes on the role of being a brand ambassador, of working
their networks to identify top talent, and seizes every conference and trade
show as an opportunity to find potential candidates, it dramatically increases
the talent pipeline. But it is also important to continue to tune the hiring
process for success, and as the strategy insight at the end of this chapter will
discuss, feeding data on candidate sources back into the process will help
organizations to work that pipeline more effectively.

Measuring Success
It can be easy to look inward when evaluating talent acquisition efforts. How
long does it take, what are the direct costs, how many people do we need
to interview to find someone we want to make an offer to? These are
important considerations, and do need to be managed to create an efficient
talent acquisition process. But those are table stakes, and baseline upon
which to build an effective recruiting strategy. The measures by which hiring
needs to be evaluated are all about the business. According to Best-in-Class
companies in this study, the top success evaluation criteria also include
customer impact, near- and long-term employee performance, and the
achievement of overall business goals (Table 3).


Page 10

Table 3: Most Valuable Measures of Talent Acquisition Success
Most Important Metric Best-in-Class
(Scale of 1 - 5: "1" is least valuable and "5" is most valuable) Rating
Quality of hire 4.18
Customer satisfaction 4.07
Ongoing employee performance (i.e. long-term
performance following the employee's first review) 4.07
Hiring manager satisfaction 4.06
Employee engagement 4.04
Achievement of organizational objectives (MBO's or KPI's) 4.03

The good news is that process efficiency metrics and business impact
metrics are not mutually exclusive. In fact, outside of those criteria used to
determine the Best-in-Class, top performing companies are impacting all of
these key areas and more. Figure 5 and Figure 6 show that the right
strategies and capabilities result in both an efficient and effective recruiting
process and far exceed all other organizations in performance on the most
important measures.

Figure 5: Performance on Key Metrics

80% 77%
Best-in-Class All Others
64%
57%
60%

38%
40%
26% 25%

20%

0%
Percentage of Percentage of new hires Em ployees receiving
organizational KPI's or rating them s elves as ratings of "exceeds "
MBO's achieved "highly engaged" perform ance
expectations

Hiring the right people, individuals that stay with the organization, get up to
speed quickly, and that meet the needs of the hiring managers that run your
business - the criteria by which Aberdeen has defined it's talent acquisition
Best-in-Class - has long term and significant impact on the organization and
the individual. Not only do you improve by nearly two-to-one overall
organizational and individual performance, but the new employee is also


Page 11

more likely to feel engaged, and aligned with company culture, values and
priorities - a true win-win.

Figure 6: Performance Improvement on Key Metrics

15% Best-in-Class All Others
11%
10%
10%

5%
2% 2%

0%
0% -1%

-5%

-7%
-10% Customer Customer -9%
satisfaction retention Time to hire Cost per hire

Figure 6 represents the case for hiring efficiency and effectiveness in a nut
shell. Getting the right people on the team, and cultivating an ongoing,
proactive talent acquisition culture not only saves time and money, but it
correlates to the ability to keep customers coming back. While a hiring
process alone won't retain customers, a good process minimizes disruption
to your clients. When you have a deep talent pool to pull from, projects
aren't delayed while you search to fill for a sudden departure. When you
have a strong process to assess for skills and fit, it is seamless to a customer
who is new on the job and who's been there longer. An organization's
ability to see into the pool of available talent, know who to look for, and
how to evaluate the prospect of success will hire faster, hire better, and be
able to ramp up for growth more quickly.

Aberdeen Insights — Strategy

Just as talent acquisition needs to be a continuous process, the work of
improving and fine tuning that process must be continuous as well.
Particularly when it comes to how and where to source, and the talent
needed to power evolving business strategy, companies must evolve and
innovate. One area many recruiters keep a close eye on is the source of
hire. When you have top performers in an organization and want to find
more talent with similar skills, experience or outlook, knowing where
that individual came from can be very helpful. This information can help
shape a recruiting strategy, build a talent pool, or set the tone for
ongoing candidate relationship management outreach.
continued


Page 12

Aberdeen Insights — Strategy

And while Figure 4 highlighted the sources companies view as most
effective, the truth is that many organizations struggle with actually
tracking the source of a hire and linking it to ongoing performance. Just
20% of respondents indicate that they have the ability to tie the source of
a candidate to their performance as an employee. The Best-in-Class are
twice as likely to link the two, but still just 34% cite this capability, as
compared to 16% of all others. So what is standing in the way of this
critical information that companies need to help them continue to
improve talent acquisition? Overwhelmingly it comes down to a lack of
data integration.

Figure 7: Barriers to Linking Hiring Source to Performance

59% 60% Best-in-Class All Others
60%

40% 37%
29% 31% 31%
23% 23%
20%

%
Candidate data Em ployee Candidate s ource Em ployee
and pos t-hire performance data is not tracked perform ance
em ployee data meas ures are not m eas ures are not
are not integrated aligned to hiring clearly defined
criteria


Solving this integration issue will be critical to help organizations shape
their ongoing talent acquisition strategy, and is really the ultimate success
metric for sourcing efforts. Until companies can know where their top
talent comes from and can create ways to build relationships with those
talent pools, they will not be as efficient or effective at hiring as they aim
to be.

In the next chapter, we will see what the top performers are doing to
achieve the kinds of hiring success enjoyed by Best-in-Class organizations.


Page 13

Chapter Two: Benchmarking
Requirements for Success
Talent acquisition has many facets. Bringing them together in support of achieving Fast Facts
organizational goals is the goal of an effective and efficient hiring strategy.
81% of Best-in-Class
Case Study — West Penn Allegheny Health System
organizations indicate that
hiring managers are given
West Penn Allegheny Health System (WPAHS) is comprised of five visibility into the status of
hospitals and multiple outpatient care centers in Western Pennsylvania. candidates in the
The system serves Pittsburgh and the surrounding area. To fill the talent recruitment process, vs. just
pipeline for such a vast array of job types and locations, the organization 59% of Laggards
relies on a very proactive, direct sourcing approach that emphasizes
77% of Best-in-Class
building networks and cultivating talent pools. “We know we have to do organizations hold key
more than post and pray,” said Irv Naar, Vice President, HR Operations stakeholders accountable for
& Talent Acquisition at WPAHS. “And for evergreen positions like new-hire onboarding, vs. just
nurses, we are always on the lookout for the best talent.” The 50% of Laggards
organization is using several key strategies to help them meet their
ongoing hiring needs.
One of the strategies WPAHS has used for nurses in particular is to find
new ways to connect with experienced nurses and reaching out to new
nursing school grads. Most organizations only have a limited number of
spots for new grads, as they require a different level of supervision and
an up-front investment from the employer in time and training. As a
result, new nurses may struggle to find jobs, and most organizations are
inundated with nursing grad applications – so many that often hospitals
don’t bother to even get back in touch with applicants. But WPAHS
knows that these nurses won’t be new forever, and uses this first
interaction to start building relationships. “I can’t always offer them a job,
but I can offer them communication,” said Naar. “We really believe that
they will remember who reached out at a time when others may have
ignored them.” Once communication has been established, venues like
social media, domain-specific websites and emails keep them in the talent
pool. And even if an applicant themselves isn’t the right fit, they may be
part of the network reaching others who are. This philosophy has helped
produce a steady supply of nurses and kept nurse vacancy rates low.
WPAHS also believes in the power of its entire workforce to help them
find new talent. Referrals are hugely important in all job roles, and
technology is helping them make the most of it. Through a recent
investment in a social recruitment platform the organization has given its
workforce tools that allow them to easily tap into their own personal
networks. “We don’t have to know what venues to visit or pools to tap
into. Our people already know where other talented individuals like them
reside so these tools make it easy for them to share postings and
information with their online networks,” said Naar. Building relationships,
through traditional means and new technology is a critical component of
talent acquisition success for WPAHS, and forms the heart of their
recruiting philosophy.


Page 14

Competitive Assessment
Aberdeen Group analyzed the aggregated metrics of surveyed companies to
determine whether their performance ranked as Best-in-Class, Industry
Average, or Laggard. In addition to having common performance levels, each
class also shared characteristics in five key categories: (1) process (the
approaches they take to execute daily operations); (2) organization
(corporate focus and collaboration among stakeholders); (3) knowledge
management (contextualizing data and exposing it to key stakeholders);
(4) technology (the selection of the appropriate tools and the effective
deployment of those tools); and (5) performance management (the
ability of the organization to measure its results to improve its business).
These characteristics (identified in Table 4) serve as a guideline for best
practices, and correlate with Best-in-Class performance.

Table 4: The Competitive Framework
Best-in-Class Average Laggards
Hiring managers are given visibility into the status of
candidates in the recruitment process
81% 69% 59%
Process Stakeholder accountability is established for the
onboarding process to ensure employee is ready to go on
day one
77% 57% 50%
Job roles deemed most critical to organizational success
(i.e. the roles that have the greatest impact on revenue /
Organization
profit) have been identified
72% 53% 46%
Core competencies (skills, knowledge, and attributes) are
Knowledge defined at the start of the hiring process
79% 69% 59%
Talent acquisition technologies currently in use:
83% External 81% External 65% External
online job / online job / online job /
career portal career portal career portal
76% Employee / 73% Employee / 67% Employee /
candidate candidate candidate
background background background
checking checking checking
Technology 59% Applicant 60% Applicant 42% Applicant
tracking system tracking system tracking system
(ATS) (ATS) (ATS)
58% Employee 54% Employee 50% Employee
referral tracking referral tracking referral tracking
tools tools tools
49% Social 41% Social 35% Social
networking networking networking
tools or blogs tools or blogs tools or blogs
Data from the recruiting process is integrated with the
Performance company's performance management process
33% 17% 13%

Page 15

Capabilities and Enablers
Building and sustaining the types of strategies laid out in Chapter One
requires a wide range of capabilities, tools and technologies. At the core, all
of these enablers are about deepening knowledge and building relationships
to help organizations see what they have, what they need, and where to find
it, when it comes to the talent to run their business.
Process
Establishing a process is all about knowing who does what when, and
optimizing a workflow so individuals know what is expected, know the status
of the process, and can work toward the desired outcome. So it is not
surprising that the top capability among Best-in-Class organizations is around
providing visibility into the status of candidates in the recruiting process.
Anyone who has sat in the chair of a recruiter or a hiring manager knows what
an anxious time it can be. Hiring managers want to see how many resumes are
coming in, who's on deck for an interview, and who may be considered for an
offer. Finding ways to share this information, whether through manual updates
or by utilizing technology to manage and report on the workflow, visibility is an
essential part of collaborating on finding a new hire.
One of the other key differentiators is ensuring collaboration around
onboarding, which is an important part of the talent acquisition lifecycle.
Aberdeen's March 2011 study Onboarding 2011: The Path to Productivity found
that 83% of Best-in-Class organizations started onboarding prior to day one
nearly half of those (46%) indicated onboarding started upon offer
extension, prior even to acceptance. Clearly the lines between the hiring
process and the onboarding process are blurred, which is a good thing. It is
one individual going through the process of being a candidate and then a
new employee. But it's important to keep in mind that a collaborative
process involving the right stakeholders is critical to not only finding, but
keeping top talent. That same onboarding study also found that the most
prevalent onboarding strategies cited by Best-in-Class organizations is to
better involve hiring managers and other line of business stakeholders in the
onboarding process. And indeed, those top performing companies are
outpacing the rest in terms of this involvement (Figure 8).


Page 16

Figure 8: Leadership Involvement in Onboarding
100% Best-in-Class
Industry Average
83%
Laggard
74%
75% 69%

52%
50%
41%
35%
29% 29%
23%
25%

0%
Hiring m anager Senior-ranking Buddy / m entor
organizational executive
Source: Aberdeen Group, February 2011

Organization
When it comes to building a sustainable talent pipeline, a good mantra to
Fast Facts
keep in mind is "no business plan without a talent plan." This means that
staffing, HR and talent leaders must be joined at the hip with the operational Best-in-Class organizations
units and use the business goals and strategy to guide their efforts. Best-in- are 57% more likely than
Class organizations are 57% more likely than Laggards (72% vs. 46%) to Laggards to indicate that the
job roles deemed most
indicate that the job roles deemed most critical to organizational success,
critical to organizational
those roles that have the greatest impact on revenue / profit, have been success, have been identified
identified. It is critical to know what roles drive the most value for the
organization because those roles are the ones where the deepest talent
pool must be developed. If you rely on a strong sales force, a particular
professional expertise, or a specific trade, building that pipeline of ongoing
relationships with potential candidates for those roles will help manage
business risk. Any day vacant in a critical role, or spent ramping up a new
hire that isn't an ideal match to the job, can cost an organization. Knowing
where the points of vulnerability are helps to mitigate risk as well as create
a plan to support growth. Companies with this capability saw three times
the improvement in customer retention (6% vs. 2%) and two times the
improvement in customer satisfaction (6% vs. 3%) over those without it, in
addition to allowing for greater achievement of overall goals, and improved
new hire performance and engagement (Figure 9).


Page 17

Figure 9: Impact of Identifying Critical Roles

60% Have Identif ied critical job roles
51% Have not identif ied critical job roles

44%
39% 38%
40%
33%
26%

20%

0%
Organizational goals New hires m eeting tim e New hires highly
achieved to perform ance goals engaged


Knowledge Management
Defining the core competencies required for a role was second only to
improving visibility into candidate status in the hiring process among Best-in-
Class organizations (81% vs. 79%). Competencies and competency
frameworks are a common and effective way for organizations to gain a
clearer understanding of a role and to provide a way to screen for the skills,
behaviors and attributes required by a role. Well over half (56%) of
organizations indicate the use of some sort of pre-hire assessment within
the hiring process, and in Aberdeen's April 2011 study on Assessments,
building a competency framework against which the organization can make
better selection, placement and promotion decisions was the number one
strategy among all organizations. By combining the skills and attributes of
current top performers in a role, organizational values and culture, and the
skills that are required by forward-looking business strategy, organizations
can begin to paint a picture of success to guide hiring efforts.

Technology
Talent acquisition truly is a lifecycle, which runs from earliest awareness of
an organization as an employer to an employee successfully meeting their
first performance milestones. As a result, a wide range of tools,
technologies and enablers show up as part of recruiting efforts - some to
help manage the whole process, and some to solve for very specific slices of
it. Two that speak to the overall management are job portals and the use of
an Applicant Tracking System (ATS). Having a forum to share job and
employment information is the top enabler, but well over half (59%) of top
performers also use some sort of technology to track candidates through
that process. Given the importance of visibility into candidate status as
pointed out in the Process section above, these tools can be helpful to guide
individuals into the process and manage them through it.

Page 18

Employee screening and background checking solutions are also widely
used. Risk management is a key consideration in talent acquisition, and
mitigating the risk of hiring someone with a questionable work history,
criminal record, or eligibility to work is hugely important, as called out in
the August 2011 report Employee Screening Strategies. These kinds of
missteps can be costly in terms of the time and money that must be spent
to resolve such situations, as well as the liability it may leave the employer
open to. The majority of organizations that currently use screening
solutions to perform background checks are not only using them for
employee groups at all levels of the organization, they're continuing to use
them post-hire as part of ongoing compliance efforts (Figure 10).

Figure 10: Employee Groups Screened Pre- and Post-Hire

100% Pre-hire
82% 84% 85% Post-hire
78%
75%
65% 66% 66%
61%
50%
50%
34%

25%

%
Individual Front-line Mid-level Executives Contract or
contributors managers m anagers contingent
labor

Source: Aberdeen Group, Employee Screening Strategies, July 2011

And of course, organizations are looking to tools like social networking and Fast Facts
mobile devices to help with sourcing, as well as improving efficiency and Currently 41% of all
outcomes in the hiring process. Currently just 41% of all organizations organizations indicate the
indicate the use of social networking tools as part of recruitment efforts, use of social networking
but another 28% plan to start using them in the coming year, making social tools as part of recruitment
media the number one growth area among talent acquisition enablers. efforts, but another 28%
Companies not yet thinking about how to integrate social media and social plan to start using them in
the coming year
sourcing tools should consider this option. Future generations of talent will
look to interact with colleagues and employers in new ways and companies
need to adapt to attract the talent they need. Figure 11 illustrates current
usage and strategies in social recruiting.


Page 19

Figure 11: Social Talent Acquisition Strategies
80%
80% All Respondents
67%
61%
60%

40%

22%
20%

%
Organization Recruiters trained Social networking Succes s m etrics
m aintains a com on us e of s ocial is a critical part of defined for us e of
pany profile on s networking tools recruitm ent s ocial networking
ocial strategy tools
networking s ites

And surely as night follows day, mobile follows social into the realm of
talent acquisition. As people have become more reliant on social networks
for news, information and relationship building, they have taken that
interaction to mobile platforms, accessing people, information and
processes on phones, via tablets, and through mobile apps. Just 16% of
respondents currently use mobile solutions in talent acquisition, but these
organizations are using them in several ways. Activities that can accelerate
the process, such as requesting and granting approvals show up along with
tools to improve the experience by letting individuals look at postings, start
the application process, and receive status updates on their preferred device
(Figure 12).

Figure 12: Most Common Mobile Recruiting Activities

75% All Respondents
63% 61%
54%

50% 45%
38%

25%

%
Job requis Application Interview Job-post View
ition subm is sion s cheduling brows ing application
approvals progres s


Page 20

Performance Management
Talent acquisition is not a one time activity. It is an ongoing process that
must evolve with the organization's needs and strategy. In order to
continually tune the hiring process to deliver strong employees that can
execute on business strategies, information on how those former applicants
and candidates, now turned employees, are actually doing should be
gathered. But currently, just 33% of even Best-in-Class companies integrate
data from the sourcing and hiring processes with the performance
management process. So when looking at performance, there is no way to
tie it back and understand what hiring sources are yielding top performers,
which assessment outcomes are predicting success, or how efficient the
hiring process is at finding individuals for key roles. This area is one where
there is the greatest room for improvement among all organizations -
feeding information and data back and forth between recruiting, employee
performance, and business performance in order to continually improve the
process. When asked if talent acquisition activities can be linked to
businesses results, 57% indicate they could, but just 32% of those indicate
that there is data to back up the correlation. Companies can still gain a lot
in terms of process efficiency and hiring outcomes by measuring more and
linking hiring data to the business going forward.

Aberdeen Insights — Technology

The Buggles tried to predict the future of music back in 1981 when the
video of their song "Video Killed the Radio Star" became the first ever to
be aired on the brand new MTV network in the US. Despite that
prediction, most of us still manage to listen to music without pictures
today, and MTV has become better known as a source of guilty-pleasure
reality TV. But video has indeed changed our world. We video chat with
our friends, put our kids on webcam to say hello to grandma, and think
nothing of conducting a business meeting across oceans while still seeing
our colleagues faces. The hiring process is no exception when it comes
to taking advantage of online video technology.
For the past three years Aberdeen has studied video enabled talent
acquisition, which it defines broadly as the practice of utilizing web-based
video applications to conduct and / or record both two-way interviews in
real time or asynchronous interview question responses to pre-recorded
interview questions. The use of video has been growing, and this year
42% of respondents indicated some form of video use within the talent
acquisition process. Predominantly organizations are using two-way,
synchronous capabilities (86%) but some are also using video solutions to
enable hiring decision collaboration (26%) and to record asynchronous
interview responses. In early October 2011 Aberdeen will publish its
latest full report on the use of video interviewing, which will further
detail the impact of this enabler on the hiring process.


Page 21

Chapter Three:
Required Actions
Whether a company is trying to move its performance in talent acquisition Fast Facts
from Laggard to Industry Average, or Industry Average to Best-in-Class, the Laggard organizations are
following actions will help spur the necessary performance improvements: 25% less likely than Best-in-
Class organizations to
indicate that they define job
Laggard Steps to Success role competencies at the
Define competencies. Just over half (59%) of Laggard start of the hiring process
organizations indicate that they define job role competencies at the
start of the hiring process, and they are 25% less likely than Best-in-
Class organizations to do so (79%). Competencies are critical to
communicating business needs to the recruiter and serve as a
foundation for assessing talent. Defining the characteristics of top
performers is a good first step in laying the foundation for talent
acquisition success.
Ensure talent acquisition never stops. Currently nearly half
(48%) of Laggards define their talent acquisition efforts as reactive,
waiting for a requisition to come in and filling it. And these
organizations are 33% more likely than Best-in-Class companies to
take this position. But given the critical shortages of key skills many
fields are feeling today or anticipate in the near future, and given the
highly competitive nature of the talent marketplace, hoping top
talent will be there when you have an open requisition is not an
optimal strategy. At least for key roles, make hiring a more ongoing
process.
Use assessments to filter. Companies need to improve both
efficiency and effectiveness of hiring efforts. Assessments provide
data to help with this, and are use by 59% of the Best-in-Class for
hiring. Aberdeen's previous research has showed proven increases
in hiring manager satisfaction, time to performance and new hire
engagement as a result of pre-hire assessment use. Efficient tools to
ensure better fit talent make a real business impact.

Industry Average Steps to Success
Don't think talent acquisition is over on day one. Just as
previous Aberdeen research has shown that effective onboarding
starts before day one, a true talent acquisition lifecycle doesn't stop
there. How a former candidate, now employee, interacts with the
organization during the first days and weeks of employment has a
huge impact on retention, engagement, and ultimately the return on
hiring investment. Just 57% of Industry Average organizations have
clear roles and accountability in place to ensure individuals have
everything they need to hit the ground running, a number that
jumps to 77% among the Best-in-Class.


Page 22

Build a talent acquisition culture. The research shows the
importance of making talent acquisition an ongoing process, as
opposed to a purely reactive one. But to help make this a reality,
top performing companies don't put this burden on HR or the
staffing function alone - they adopt a culture where everyone sees it
as their responsibility to find talent and introduce that talent to the
organization. Industry Average organizations are 29% less likely to
adopt this as a top hiring strategy than the Best-in-Class (31% vs.
22%).
Use tools to increase referrals. By far employee referrals
continue to be viewed as the top sources for new hires, and as
noted in the bullet above, making finding talent a piece of everyone's
job is an important strategy. But providing tools to help individuals
in this quest is also important. Just over half (54%) of Industry
Average organizations use such tools now, but an additional 16%
plan to add them into the arsenal in the coming year.

Best-in-Class Steps to Success
Build talent pools to fill critical roles. Competition for top
performers and key skills is stiff, so knowing where to find it when
you need it is the most important weapon organizations have in the
war for talent. Currently 72% of Best-in-Class organizations have
identified the roles with the greatest impact on revenue and
business outcomes, and are 44% more likely than all others to do
so. This must continue, but companies must also use that
information to make sure they can build a pipeline and build
relationships to draw upon when the time comes to fill those
critical positions.
Continue to explore social and mobile recruiting. Innovative
companies must have innovative recruiting solutions. Using social
and mobile recruiting isn't about doing it for its own sake; it's about
using all the options to find who you need. But as more and more
job seekers look to new platforms to connect with peers,
colleagues and potential employers, hiring organizations have to be
in the game. Best-in-Class organizations are 26% more likely than all
others to indicate the use of these tools, and another 28% plan to
use them in the future.
Integrate recruiting data into other talent processes. A lack
of data integration is the number one barrier to identifying the
source of hire for top performers, an issue that will prevent
companies from effectively repeating past successes. Without the
information to continue to link hiring to other talent and business
metrics, companies will optimize their talent acquisition processes
without necessarily optimizing their business outcomes.


Page 23

Aberdeen Insights — Summary

Talent Acquisition isn’t just about a warm body to fill a job. At it’s best,
it’s a launching pad for new insights, energy, and ongoing performance for
the organization. When a new hire is the right fit for a role, a team and a
culture it can make a vast difference in an organizations ability to retain,
develop and engage that individual. Hiring is hard, but companies with a
strong process – one that has clearly defined the needs, has relationships
with the right candidates, and tools to help support decision making –
not only make it easier, but make it better for the candidate, the hiring
manager and for the business.


Page 24

Appendix A:
Research Methodology
Between January and August 2011, Aberdeen examined the use, the Study Focus
experiences, and the intentions of more than 500 enterprises in regards to
talent acquisition. Responding organizations
completed an online survey
Aberdeen supplemented this online survey effort with telephone interviews that included questions
with select survey respondents, gathering additional information on talent designed to determine the
acquisition strategies, experiences, and results. following:

Responding enterprises included the following: The degree to which talent
acquisition software is
Job title: The research sample included respondents with the implemented and its impact
following job titles: CEO / President (16%); EVP / SVP / VP (18%); on hiring
Director (25%); Manager (27%); Consultant (6%); Staff (7%); and The effect of social
other (1%). networking on identifying
Department / function: The research sample included respondents and sourcing talent
from the following departments or functions: HR / talent Current processes that are
management (53%); corporate management (13%); business the focus of talent
development, sales and marketing (11%); operations (6%); IT (4%) acquisition efforts and derive
and other (13%). the most benefit
Industry: The research sample included respondents from a wide The study aimed to identify
variety of industries. Some of the larger industries represented emerging best practices in the
were IT consulting / services (11%); software (8%); financial services talent acquisition lifecycle, and
(6%); government (8%); medical / healthcare (5%). to provide a framework by
which readers could assess
Geography: The majority of respondents (73%) were from North their own management
America. Remaining respondents were from Europe (10%); the capabilities.
Asia-Pacific region (11%); Middle East / Africa (4%): and South
America (2%).
Company size: Twenty-four percent (28%) of respondents were from
large enterprises (annual revenues above US $1 billion); 28% were
from midsize enterprises (annual revenues between $50 million and
$1 billion); and 44% of respondents were from small businesses
(annual revenues of $50 million or less).
Headcount: Forty-five percent (45%) of respondents were from large
enterprises (headcount greater than 1,000 employees); 24% were
from midsize enterprises (headcount between 100 and 999
employees); and 31% of respondents were from small businesses
(headcount between 1 and 99 employees).


Page 25

Table 5: The PACE Framework Key
Overview
Aberdeen applies a methodology to benchmark research that evaluates the business pressures, actions, capabilities,
and enablers (PACE) that indicate corporate behavior in specific business processes. These terms are defined as
follows:
Pressures — external forces that impact an organization’s market position, competitiveness, or business
operations (e.g., economic, political and regulatory, technology, changing customer preferences, competitive)
Actions — the strategic approaches that an organization takes in response to industry pressures (e.g., align the
corporate business model to leverage industry opportunities, such as product / service strategy, target markets,
financial strategy, go-to-market, and sales strategy)
Capabilities — the business process competencies required to execute corporate strategy (e.g., skilled people,
brand, market positioning, viable products / services, ecosystem partners, financing)
Enablers — the key functionality of technology solutions required to support the organization’s enabling business
practices (e.g., development platform, applications, network connectivity, user interface, training and support,
partner interfaces, data cleansing, and management)
Source: Aberdeen Group, September 2011

Table 6: The Competitive Framework Key
Overview

The Aberdeen Competitive Framework defines enterprises In the following categories:
as falling into one of the following three levels of practices Process — What is the scope of process
and performance: standardization? What is the efficiency and
Best-in-Class (20%) — Practices that are the best effectiveness of this process?
currently being employed and are significantly superior to Organization — How is your company currently
the Industry Average, and result in the top industry organized to manage and optimize this particular
performance. process?
Industry Average (50%) — Practices that represent the Knowledge — What visibility do you have into key
average or norm, and result in average industry data and intelligence required to manage this process?
performance. Technology — What level of automation have you
Laggards (30%) — Practices that are significantly behind used to support this process? How is this automation
the average of the industry, and result in below average integrated and aligned?
performance. Performance — What do you measure? How
frequently? What’s your actual performance?

Table 7: The Relationship Between PACE and the Competitive Framework
PACE and the Competitive Framework – How They Interact
Aberdeen research indicates that companies that identify the most influential pressures and take the most
transformational and effective actions are most likely to achieve superior performance. The level of competitive
performance that a company achieves is strongly determined by the PACE choices that they make and how well they
execute those decisions.


Page 26

Appendix B:
Related Aberdeen Research
Related Aberdeen research that forms a companion or reference to this
report includes:
Employee Screening Strategies; August 2011
The Engagement / Performance Equation; July 2011
Assessments 2011: Selecting and Developing for the Future; May 2011
Onboarding 2011: The Path to Productivity; February 2011
The 2011 HR Executives Agenda: Automation, Innovation and Growth;
December 2010
Learning & Development 2010: Bridging the Gap Between Strategy and
Execution; October 2010
Talent Acquisition Strategies: Candidate Experience and Relationship
Management Come of Age!; August 2010
Succession Management: Sustainable Leadership for the Future; July
2010
Effective Talent Management Drives Profitable Business Growth; July
2010
Information on these and any other Aberdeen publications can be found at
www.aberdeen.com.

Author: Mollie Lombardi, Research Director, Human Capital Management,
(mollie.lombardi@aberdeen.com)
For more than two decades, Aberdeen's research has been helping corporations worldwide become Best-in-Class.
Having benchmarked the performance of more than 644,000 companies, Aberdeen is uniquely positioned to provide
organizations with the facts that matter — the facts that enable companies to get ahead and drive results. That's why
our research is relied on by more than 2.5 million readers in over 40 countries, 90% of the Fortune 1,000, and 93% of
the Technology 500.

As a Harte-Hanks Company, Aberdeen’s research provides insight and analysis to the Harte-Hanks community of
local, regional, national and international marketing executives. Combined, we help our customers leverage the power
of insight to deliver innovative multichannel marketing programs that drive business-changing results. For additional
information, visit Aberdeen http://www.aberdeen.com or call (617) 854-5200, or to learn more about Harte-Hanks, call
(800) 456-9748 or go to http://www.harte-hanks.com.

This document is the result of primary research performed by Aberdeen Group. Aberdeen Group's methodologies
provide for objective fact-based research and represent the best analysis available at the time of publication. Unless
otherwise noted, the entire contents of this publication are copyrighted by Aberdeen Group, Inc. and may not be
reproduced, distributed, archived, or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent by
Aberdeen Group, Inc. (2011a)


Aberdeen talent acquisition report

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to Aberdeen talent acquisition report

More from Eduardo Lugo Gutierrez

Aberdeen talent acquisition report