Africa and the ascendancy of modern china in international

International Affairs and Global Strategy www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-574X (Paper) ISSN 2224-8951 (Online)
Vol.7, 2013

Africa and the Ascendancy of Modern China in International
System since 1971: A Historical Appraisal
Okeke Tochukwu I.1,2*
1. School of History and Culture, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, P.R. China
2. Department of History, University of Abuja, PMB 117, F.C.T. - Abuja, Nigeria
* okeketoo@yahoo.com

Abstract
Changes in the 21st century global distribution of economic and political powers clearly suggest that the
Peoples’ Republic of China (PRC or China) can no longer be ignored, having emerged as a superpower of
substantial significance. Attempts to understand this phenomenon have produced several literatures most of
which have often relegated Africa to the margins in spite of the continent’s key contributions to China’s
contemporary international profile. This paper historicizes Africa’s socio-cultural and diplomatic capitals as
indispensable factors in understanding the phenomenal rise of China within the international system. Based
on the research findings, the paper holds that but for the strategic support of many African countries, the
rise of China in the international system may have been delayed or frustrated by the West in its attempt to
preserve its hegemony in the hitherto prevailing world order.
Keywords: Africa, modern China, international system, diplomacy

1. Introduction
Admittedly, the phenomenal growth, development and rise of modern China in the international system are
largely a function of its determination to take its destiny into its hands. Led by Mao and other patriotic
leaders, the young republic was established in 1949 after its tumultuous years of revolutions and warfare.
From 1979, the country underwent strategic economic reforms and opening up policies under the able
leadership of Deng Xiao Ping leading to its towering status, in 2010, as the World’s largest economy after
the United States (McCurry & Kollewe 2011). Much as the internal agents of change were at work in the
process of this profound transformation, external forces particularly Africa remains pivotal in understanding
this phenomenon. Today, for its socio-economic and diplomatic resources, Africa remains the coveted
continent both to the West and the East, feeding the third wave of the scramble, after the ages of slave trade
and colonialism. For China, its interest in Africa is of two components: economic and diplomatic (Jedrzej &
Manuel 2007). Economically, Beijing’s rapid economic boom depends largely on Africa’s energy resources,
raw materials, investment opportunities and a market for its industrial products. While this has received
considerable studies, Africa’s diplomatic importance to China, on which its international profile partly
hinges, has been consigned to passing comments.

In the following discourses, the paper examines how Africa has diplomatically contributed in the
architecture of China’s ascendancy in the international system, with immense implications for restructuring
of global power distribution. It contextualizes Africa as China’s viable support constituency both in the
United Nation (UN) and in its reunification project, especially as it concerns eroding Taiwan’s sovereignty.
Furthermore, the paper analyses Africa’s support for one-China policy as fitting into the pattern of
South-South cooperation against Western neo-imperial attempts to undermine the sovereignty of the global
South. Although rarely recognized, the paper deploys empirical issues to argue that Africa functions as
China’s access to the world. Given the robust dimensions of Sino-Africa ties, Africa’s political and
diplomatic capitals will, perhaps, continue to remain an incontrovertible value upon which China will
depend to sustain its emergence and recognition abroad, unity and sovereignty at home and importantly
project its power and visibility globally.

1

Vol.7, 2013

2. Dominant perspectives on Sino-Africa relationships: an overview
Since the commencement of the Cold War, literatures on the development of Sino-Africa relationships have
been largely characterized by debates that reflect sharply divided perspectives. From the contending views,
dominant perspectives can be roughly grouped into three schools; the China threat, the win-win and the
mixed impact schools.

During much of the cold war, ideology politics played a dominant role in shaping international politics,
international relations and even perceptions of the historical evolution of the time. These also reflect in the
interpretation of Sino-Africa relations. In effect, many literatures by Western scholars on Sino-African
relation are characterized by a preponderant focus on the negative forms of China’s engagement in the
continent as constituting a threat to African development (Large 2008, Mohan 2008). Leading debates
include, but not limited to, Lessing (1962), Scalapino (1964), Legum (1965), while subsequent
interpretations in this school have also emphasized how China’s strategy in Africa reverses Western
attempts at building up the basic structures on which sustainable developments in Africa can firmly take
roots. In their views, China is intensely criticized for its Africa policies that advance exploitation,
imperialism and self-serving agenda. They hold that China’s Africa policies clearly embolden authoritarian
regimes in Africa as well as discourage transparency and accountability. Also, China has been under
seemingly coordinated attacks from this school for what has been termed support for the violations of the
environment, human rights, democracy and exacerbation of Africa’s dependency status as exporter of
primary products, etc. (Lake & Whiteman 2006) (Navarro 2011), etc. Although some of the criticisms of
this school seem well thought out, they appear to be paranoid just as they give the impression that
China-Africa engagements must strictly adhere with Western values and standards. As noted by Mohan
(2008) and Large (2008), plenty of anecdotal evidence and paucity of systematic data seem to have created
room for speculations, paranoia and exaggerated extrapolation in which a case of China’s less positive
engagement with a few African countries is projected as representative of the entire China-Africa
relationship. Perhaps, this approach sustains the notion that it allows little room for the understanding of
China’s unique approach and the philosophies driving its activities in Africa. Engaging China on those (less
positive) issues more constructively holds the potentials of improving on those areas of concern, hence
paving the way for developments that benefit all.

While the China threat school is primarily concerned with the negatives, the win-win school has maintained
the opposite stance. They insist that Sino-Africa relation is a viable form of partnership for development.
From the neo-liberal ideological standpoint and based on the philosophy of South-South cooperation, the
school maintains that the relationship is poised to encourage positive development, rather than imperialism,
not just in China and Africa, but across the third world (Han-Chen 1965). Over the years, various Chinese
leaderships are well known to have espoused the philosophy of the win-win cooperation strategy.
Reiterating this in 2006, President Hu Jintao told Nigeria’s federal Legislature that China’s development
will not bring a threat to anyone, instead, will bring more opportunities and space for development to the
world (French 2006). This statement has a wider significance. It was a well calculated message not only
meant for his immediate audience but as a response to those that subscribe to the idea of China threat.
Although with a note of caution, Robert (2008) contends that …China’s current thrust into sub-Saharan
Africa promises to do more for economic growth and poverty alleviation there than anything attempted by
Western colonialism or the massive initiatives of the international lending agencies and other donors. The
central message of this school of thought is that China is neither altruistic nor is it playing a zero-sum game
in its relations with Africa. They argue that the transformatory power of China’s relations with Africa will
draws from the comparative advantages of both sides, in which each side balances its deficits with surplus
values accessible from the other partner, hence encouraging healthy developments for both sides. In effect
China and Africa seek to maintain a mutually beneficial relationship devoid of exploitation, inequality,
disrespect and violation of sovereignty. Admittedly, the win-win theory and its associated guiding principles
are often used as the catch-phrase, nevertheless, it is discernible that most Chinese and some other writers
that hold this view are keen to study how China aids Africa, (put differently, how the continent benefits
from China), without devoting a corresponding measure of studies on how China also benefits from Africa

2

Vol.7, 2013

as well as the challenges arising from their engagements. This imbalance that runs through their works
presents unique problems in appreciating the bigger picture that actually characterize the ties. This is
because rather than sustain the win-win ideology through emphasizing a trend of interdependent
relationship, this style of writing unintentionally reflects dependency, feeds the rising criticisms against the
relationship and presents the win-win initiative as mere rhetoric.

The third school in this debate is of the view that the impacts of China in Africa are mixed. That is, much as
it has very positive influences in the continent, some of Chinese strategies are less positive with varying
degrees of consequences on Africa’s sustainable development. Therefore it is neither gloomy nor glorious
as the earlier schools mostly contend. Published in 2007, a report on China in Africa concludes thus; The
study found that China’s economic profile in Africa has produced a ‘mixed bag’ of effects and responses
among all groups of stakeholders (Africapractice 2007). Also, Tull (2006) agrees that Beijing’s economic
impact on Africa is perhaps a mixed blessing, but he describes the political impact as ultimately deleterious.
Further, this school seems to suggest that the intensification of strategies that produce the positive impacts
should be encouraged while those that culminate in negative consequences must be addressed through a
review of the rules and processes of engagement.

Be that as it may, it would appear that the evolving international geopolitics of the post-cold war era, as
well as domestic issues affecting China (and to a large extent Africa) accounts as main influences that
factor the perspectives (Large 2008). In general, the central theses that run through the existing literatures
on this subject matter can be roughly conceptualized in three dimensions. The first is that Africa is
interpreted as the endangered prey of China. Secondly, that the continent benefits more from China which
is sometimes characterized as benign. The third perspective has focused on a more objective theme of
interdependence emphasizing mutual benefits and costs, although some writers in this fold have
marginalized Africa’s reciprocity, perhaps inadvertently. Agreeably, these approaches have clearly focused
on intellectually important aspects of the subject, but the unannounced philosophy driving these debates
seem to intrinsically correspond with the competition between the West and China for Africa’s resources,
for which most of China’s critics are understandably helpless and concerned. While some of the criticisms
are well founded on facts, several as demonstrated by Brautigam (2009) are either exaggerated, unfounded,
unrepresentative or even similar to practices for which Western countries are also culpable. Be it for the
positive, negative or a combination of both factors, the role of China in the development of Sino-Africa
relations, as most existing literature reflect, is often imposingly central, while that of Africa is mostly
consigned to the periphery, thereby conveying a sense of less important participant in the making of
Sino-Africa ties. This is an unfair element against which existing literatures have not been vocal. It is this
false sense of history that this paper addresses through historicizing the place of Africa in its relations with
China, particularly as it concerns its rise to prominence in the global system.

3. Africa and China’s ascendancy in the United Nations
Before October 25th 1971, China’s seat in the UN and membership of the UN Security Council had been
occupied by the Republic of China (ROC, or Taiwan). However, information available at online Wikipedia
has it that, as from that day, following the adoption of No.2758 UN resolution by the general assembly,
Peoples’ Republic of China (PRC) was formally admitted to its seat in UN and membership of the Security
Council. Significantly, this withdrew international recognition from ROC, and transferred same to PRC.
Hence, PRC became the sole legitimate government of China, internationally recognized by the UN.
Although the United States (US) did not spare efforts to frustrate PRC in its quest to reclaim its position in
the floor of the UN, PRC was supported by much of the third world, of which African states constituted a
significant part. A Chinese scholar, Gao (1984), posits that they (African nations) made the greatest
contribution to the recovery of China’s legitimate seat in the United Nations Organization. Also, some other
nations, particularly Asians played very crucial roles in the actualization of this feat. The statistics show
that, of the 128 countries that were present at the UN meeting, 76 states voted in favor of PRC, 35 opposed,
while 17 abstained (Gao 1984). Though some African countries opposed China’s bid, among the 76 that
voted in favor were 26 African states, constituting one-third of the total votes cast in favor of PRC (Tareq

3

Vol.7, 2013

1971). Africa’s vote in this regard has been recorded in history as a very important contribution towards
raising the PRC’s international profile. This is because, of the tripod that supported the actualization of the
PRC’s objective and ascendancy in the UN, Africa’s block vote constituted a whole part without which the
other two would have collapsed in defeat. According to UN conventions, two third of the votes cast must be
in support of the motion to ensure victory. The significance of this was captured by The Christian Science
Monitor which reported that the African delegates were in a frenzy of delight –their arms swooping above
their heads and jumping up and down in their seats as wild applause engulfed the circular chamber (Tareq
1971). Overwhelmed with this show of solidarity, Chairman Mao Zedong once said that it is African
brothers who literally carried us to the UN (Wang 2009). As a consequence of this overwhelming support,
PRC’s international image received a big boost, signaling the arrival of the PRC in the mainstream
international politics. According to Taylor,

China postures an image of itself as an image of the developing world,
if not its effective leader through the possession of a permanent seat on
the Security Council. This position enables Beijing to project China
onto the global stage as a major player in its own right. But if this
image is to be sustained and carried off, Beijing feels compelled to
maintain an active and visible interest in areas such as Africa which act
as a support constituency to add political and numerical back-up to
China’s claims (Taylor 1998).

Besides, there are clear prospects for continued Africa’s support for China in the future. Africa is vital to
China in its efforts to balance the powers of the hegemonic West, as it resolves never to allow a repeat of
past humiliation by outsiders under any guise. In the matrix of the ever evolving complex international
system, China will most likely continue to rely on Africa, as well as other developing nations in the pursuit
of its economic and political objectives. In apparent confirmation of this perspective, a Chinese news
magazine clearly reveals that (the) vast number of third world countries (will) surely unite with and stand
behind China like numerous “ants” keeping the “elephant” from harm’s way (Taylor 1998). China’s past,
present and foreseeable reliance on Africa, in pursuance of its international objectives, establishes the
latter’s geo-strategic importance in the framework of the former’s foreign policy objective.

4. Africa and China’s reunification project; the case of Taiwan
Africa’s relevance in the construction of China’s ascendancy in the UN is closely related to the issue of its
reunification project. Here Africa has also shown a good amount of support through its roles and
commitments to the PRC’s one China policy. It must be noted that at certain points in history, particularly
in the 1990s, some African states had strained relationship with PRC, and consequently gravitated towards
Taiwan as it adopted the dollar diplomacy (Taylor 1998, Hongwu 2009 b). However, the trend has changed
considerably, following PRC’s renewed friendly disposition towards African nations desirous of economic
growth and development (Hongwu 2009 b). In return for Beijing’s goodwill, vast majority of African
nations continued to offer pragmatic alliance with PRC, strengthening its international profile, while
Beijing vigorously pursued its reunification program. The idea of One China had found profound
expression with the transfer of Hong Kong and Macau to Chinese sovereignty in 1997 and 1999
respectively (Taylor 1998). As Beijing continues to stress that Taiwan is part of PRC in its one China policy,
it then implies that Taiwan is the third unfinished project in the reunification process. Fundamentally, this
explains why PRC emphasizes non-recognition of Taiwan’s sovereignty as part of its foreign policy
objectives in its international relations. Be that as it may, what is important here is that most African nations
stood along with PRC in this regard. Pragmatically, Central African Republic and South Africa resumed
diplomatic recognition with PRC in January 1998, while Lesotho, Niger, Guinea-Bissau, Senegal and
Liberia also severed ties with Taipei (Taylor 1998, Hongwu 2009 b). In a related development, Taiwan had
made attempts to rejoin the UN, but PRC (with the support of African nations) had firmly opposed its entry
under any moniker. That Taiwan no longer actively asserts sovereignty over all of China, that it re-applied
for full UN membership in September 18th 2007, that Taiwan receives backing from US and many members

4

Vol.7, 2013

of the European Parliament, and that it sponsored two referenda in 2008, all did not add up to much
progress for Taiwan. In fact, online Wikipedia reports, UN subcommittee on September, 17th 2008 had again
ruled that it would not allow the General Assembly consider Taiwan’s request for permission to join the
UN…In 2009, for the first time in 17 years, Taiwan did not submit a bid to join the UN. Although not
officially stated by any party, this apparently is another setback for the Taiwan state project. However, as
a number of issues remain uncertain, it is hard to confirm if Taiwan has conceded defeat in this case. It
suffices to note that the objective of PRC’s one China policy is also indirectly being pursued by other
nations sympathetic to this cause. As part of these, African countries have played important roles in this
construction, both at the UN and at bilateral levels.

5. Africa and China’s International identity
As far as the West is concerned, China is one of the worst violators of human right in recent history. This is
an issue for which China has come under sever criticisms from the US and some European institutions and
states. Some of China’s policies and its relations with individuals and groups within China, the Taiwan, and
even with some African states had been contextualized as infractions on the fundamental right of such
persons, groups, or nations. However, it is helpful to note that what China critics perceive as human right is
not exactly the same with Chinese idea of it. China promotes a cultural relativist notion of human right with
emphasis on the collective rights, while the West emphasizes individuals’ human right (Taylor 2008, Taylor
1998). Therefore differing perception of human right even makes the issue more complex, fluid and
nebulous. More interesting is the claim by Taylor (1998) that before 4th of June 1989, human right abuses
in China (contrasting with the West’s Cold War critique of Soviet abuses) had been quietly ignored by the
West. The Tiananmen incident therefore signified a watershed in the history of Sino-Western (human rights)
relations. Not only was China isolated and sanctioned by the West, its international image was severely
damaged. In the mist of that isolation and international identity crisis, it was some African states that rose to
the occasion contributing to rebuilding China’s battered international esteem. While Angola’s foreign
minister for example expressed ‘support for the resolute action to quell the counter revolutionary rebellion’,
Namibia sent a congratulatory telegram to Chinese army (Taylor 1998). It was also an African head of state;
Blaise Compaore of Burkina Faso that became the first foreign leader to pay solidarity visit to Beijing, in
the post-Tiananmen period. Besides Zimbabwe and Zambia, some other African nations openly rallied
around China. In recognition of this fact, Hongwu (2009 b) wrote that

Later on, the first head of state, the first head of government, and the
first foreign minister to visit China after the Tiananmen incident all
came from African countries. In 1989, heads of state from Burundi,
Uganda, Togo, Mali, Burkina Faso, visited China. In 1990, heads of
state from Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, the Central African Republic,
Sierra Leone, Chad and Sudan, visited China.

In fact, many African leaders saw the Western approach to the issue as the developed world’s smokescreen
for halting the rapidly developing China. The developing nation’s solidarity and rejection of what they
perceived as western neo-imperialism, violation on their nations sovereignty and all forms of West’s
conspiracy against the third world, largely explain why those African nations rallied around China’s cause.
The views held by Snow (1995) and reechoed by Taylor (1998) in this regard is more revealing; Both China
and many Africa leaders believed themselves to have experienced and continues to face common enemies,
namely, imperialism and neo-imperialism from the developed world. Incontrovertibly, this show of
solidarity increased China’s confidence in dealing with not just the image issue, but in reviewing its foreign
policy objectives. Consequently, cushioned by Africa’s support and solidarity, China reviewed its foreign
policy mainstreaming Africa as part of its centerpiece. This was practically demonstrated in the (His
Excellency Qian Qichen) Chinese foreign minister’s tour of 14 African countries between June 1989 and
June 1992. China’s invitation of numerous African dignitaries to visit China as well as increased aid
diplomacy towards Africa further exemplifies this Taylor 1998)

5

Vol.7, 2013

In spite of the sweeping effect of the Western idea of human rights in Africa through the agency of Civil
Societies and Non-Governmental Organizations, the issue of human right appears to have galvanized both
China and some African governments at international fora, as both sides sometimes project a common front.
Human rights such as economic rights and rights of subsistence are perhaps the main priority of developing
nations, and these conceptions of human rights take precedence over individual rights as conceptualized in
the West. With inestimable support coming from Africa, China was able to successfully defeat the West
sponsored anti-China human right bills in the UN year after year (Hongwu 2009 b). At Geneva, April 1996,
this feat was repeated with the support of 14 African votes out of 26 (Taylor 1998). Again, following
China’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the intense Western opprobrium against its
dumping practices, a good number of African states again demonstrated willingness to protect the national
interest of China, leading to its recognition as a market economy (Tull 2006). The impacts of these have
had powerful effects on the concomitant ties across the Indian Ocean, as it consistently impacted on the rise
of Beijing’s international status. Indeed, Sino-Africa relation is a pivot in the structure of China’s relations
with the outside world, playing an irreplaceable role in improving contemporary China’s diplomatic
environment and boosting its international standing (Hongwu 2009 b).

It is important to acknowledge that following the opening up of China, the Western conception of human
right reforms have been taking place in the country although gradually. Over the course of three decades,
two factors have played vital roles in that regard, namely; the Chinese government and foreign direct
investments. The introductions of National Compensation Law (NCL), Prison Reform Laws (PRL), the
Labor Laws, and Labor Arbitration Commission by the government of PRC are all important steps towards
human rights reform. These were hitherto non-existent. Similarly, the emergence of rights-based labor
practices by some foreign investments in collaboration with Chinese firms has been transforming the
human rights situation among workers in China. Guthrie (2006) describes these changes as gradual and
radical, transforming the society in fundamental ways. This is because, for example NCL allows Chinese
citizens to sue the government for past wrongs just as PRL has fundamentally altered the treatment of
prisoners (Guthrie 2006). Human right reforms are very pertinent and deserve to be more pragmatically
encouraged in China.

6. Africa as China’s access to the world
Although often ignored or deemphasized, one very remarkable contribution of Africa to the development of
modern China over the years has been the provision of valued access for China’s entry into the international
scene. In other words, China’s ties with Africa afford it the opportunity to connect with the wider world in
ways that benefit China’s international reckoning. This is not only demonstrated through the offer of
increasing market space to China, but also in the context of improved socio-cultural awareness of Africa
itself.

By the end of the 1980s, Africa has provided a valuable platform to many Chinese companies, to launch
into the international market. It is on record that on the eve of 1990, over 2000 construction and labor
contracts were awarded to Chinese companies and enterprises by African states. This amounted to a large
share of Africa’s infrastructure construction industry (Hongwu 2009 b). Also, it has been estimated that
between 2001 and 2006, Africa has offered about 41 large scale construction jobs, and high level scientific
and technological projects. Examples of these include the railway modernization project in Nigeria, and
several kilometers eastern-to-western Algeria express way project. Contracts and labor cooperation
agreements signed between Chinese enterprises and their African partners in 2006 reached $28.97 billion,
accounting for 31% of China’s contract value in foreign countries (Hongwu 2009 b). Although Africa
benefit from these massive infrastructural deals, their value and significance for the development of China
is no less beneficial. Indeed, their importance is evident in a number of ways. First, Africa’s increased
provision of enabling business opportunities to China, through bilateral or multilateral agreements,
contracts and concessions, is such a value that the Chinese treasure. Secondly, the implementation of the
business agreements and contracts more importantly provide China the opportunity to demonstrate in

6

Vol.7, 2013

practical terms its engineering capacity in the international arena. Through its prestige projects that
announce Chinese presence in most of African states, the Middle Kingdom makes bold and confident
announcements to the world that its emergence in the international system is solid and for good. Clearly,
this represents an eloquent testimony to how Africa provides a platform on which China accesses the
international market and indeed the world. Besides its engineering impact in Africa, China also does this at
home. For instance, the planting of high rising public, commercial and residential buildings in China’s
major cities, the infrastructures used to host the 2008 Beijing Olympics, the 2010 Shanghai World Expo and
the 2010 Guangzhou All Asian Games, speak volumes. Their records in science, technology, medicine,
information technology, etc. compel even its critics to admit that China has made tremendous progress
within a relatively short period.

On the other hand, within the framework of increased socio-cultural education of the Chinese about Africa,
Africa has equally played an important part. Since 1980s, some Chinese students and visiting scholars were
admitted in African universities to study humanities and African languages such as Swahili, Hausa, etc. The
essence is to expand the frontiers of Chinese knowledge of Africa as a means towards substantially
increasing its access to the continent where the raw materials necessary to secure China’s future is naturally
abundant. To underscore the importance of this, the consciousness of African studies has been growing in
China at a very unprecedented rate in the nation’s history. Historiographies of Africa, written from the
Chinese perspectives are also very impressive (Ansha 2005). Also, in his piece titled African Studies and
“New Frontier” of China’s Academic Domain, Hongwu (2009 a) captures the significance of the
knowledge of Africa to the development of China. In addition to various school of Foreign and or
International studies, there are a number of Institutes, Centers, Schools, Colleges, etc. that are specifically
established to conduct studies, researches and teachings on themes that focus primarily on Africa. Some of
these Institutions include; the Institute of African Studies, Zhejiang Normal University, Zhejiang, the
Center for African Studies, Yunnan University, Yunnan, the Institute of West Asian and African Studies,
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, the School of Asian and African Studies, Beijing Foreign Studies
University, Beijing, the Center for African Law and Society, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan. These
consolidate the efforts at the establishment of the Institute of Asian and African Studies in 1961 in the wake
of Chairman Mao’s remark that ‘We don’t have a clear understanding of African history, geography and the
present situation’ (Large 2008). China It must be noted that the Chinese government’s investments in these
are certainly well calculated, because the knowledge of Africa in their thinking, perhaps, represent the
knowledge of a gateway to their future.

Furthermore, in another area of cultural exchange, China is also benefiting from Africa. Although Africa
and China are geographically far apart, yet African cultures continue to find their way into Chinese
societies in ways that excite the Chinese. Not only does the richness of African cultures enrich the Chinese
ways of life, the oriental society and its cultures have experienced greater diversity following this trend.
Recently, invaluable elements of African culture, its diversity and beauty conspicuously took center stage in
the 2010 Shanghai World Expo, to the admiration of the world, particularly the host nation. Today, several
Africans live, study, work and do business in China, thereby contributing to making the nation a melting
pot of several cultures living in harmony. For instance, although many Africans are found in many of
China’s cities such as Beijing, Shenzhen, Shanghai, Wuhan, Yiwu, etc. the case of Guangzhou in
Guangdong Province stands out. For decades now, areas in and around Guangzhou city plays host to many
people of African descent. In these areas, many Africans (despite some challenges) have successfully
integrated into the host communities through, blissful intermarriages, legitimate business transactions,
tenured or contract-based jobs, pursuit of formal education and enjoyment of good life in China. Due to this
unique development, Guangzhou city has been popularly known as the chocolate city of China. Therefore,
the role of Africans and their culture in enhancing the Middle Kingdom’s cultural diversity, beauty, and
deeper appreciation of foreign culture cannot be overemphasized. Clearly, the Chinese recognize this, as it
is evident in the writings of a Chinese scholar who holds that,

7

Vol.7, 2013

Chinese people have started appreciating and enjoying African music,
dances, woodcarvings, stone sculptures, masks, costumes, coffee and
handicrafts from different African nations and ethnic groups, as well as
books, movies, and audio-visual products about this continent, and
counted these as part of their lives. Traveling to Africa has also become
a fashion among ordinary Chinese.
Such changes and progresses in China-Africa relationship
have extended beyond economic and political scopes and influenced the
cultural life and ideology of contemporary Chinese. Over the past five
decades, cultural exchange and cooperation with African countries
have brought foreign cultural elements and nutrients from a distant
land into China, thus inspiring the cultural imagination and creation of
Chinese nation, and enhancing its cultural tolerance and diversity. All
these are of particular importance for the development of the modern
Chinese culture. (Hongwu 2009 a)

It is therefore clear that the presence of Africans in parts of China, the concomitant penetration and
acceptance of valuable material and non-material elements of African culture, have positive impacts there.
This indeed has promoted a degree of Cultural Revolution in China, vis-à-vis the transformation of Chinese
people’s perception, ideology and cultural life. This is very significant, especially when viewed in the
context of a nation that remained closed until about three decades ago. In the words of the Chinese scholar
quoted above, African inspired cultural miscegenation, imagination, tolerance, and diversity in China are
all of particular importance for the development of the modern Chinese culture.

7. Conclusion
Within the contemporary international system, China is clearly a force that cannot be shoved aside any
more. This trend has a direct bearing with the impressive amount of growth and development that it has
recorded since 1979. In 2010, the nation’s economic growth stood at 10.3%, ranking as the world’s second
largest economy and a political power of global reckoning. The historical relationship between this trend
and African countries has been the main focus of this paper. While it acknowledges the role of China
towards African development, the paper concludes that African countries have also contributed tangibly
towards the development of China and more importantly towards its visibility in the international scene in a
number of very significant ways. Both China and Africa acknowledges the value of their relationship, and
strives hard to grow it for the benefit of both sides. The emergence of Forum for China-Africa Cooperation
in year 2000 and the conduct of their triennial summits is an elegant testimony to this.

As their increasingly complex engagements deepen and broaden, the socio-economic and political values
that accrue, just like for Africa, are also in favor of China. Opening up the vast continent granted substantial
benefits to the Middle Kingdom in its modernization process. In fact, Africa’s valuable energy resources,
inestimable raw materials and vast markets are intricately linked to China’s energy security, industrial
power and investment returns respectively. Having focused mainly on the diplomatic rather than the
economic, the paper concludes that turning East policies of most African countries have also given vent to
the demonstration of Chinese engineering capacity and international prestige among the comity of nations.
Substantially, Africa’s political and diplomatic support for China in the international system remains key in
understanding China’s ascendancy globally, in the United Nations and overall success in some vital areas of
its national interest, particularly as it concerns its highly prized national sovereignty. These are very
important unsung values that the continent adds to China’s profile.

References
Africapractice, (2007), The Impact of the Chinese Presence in Africa, JETRO, London

Ansha, L. (2005), “African Studies in China in the Twentieth Century: A Historiographical Survey”,

8

Vol.7, 2013

African Studies Review, 48 (1), African Studies Association, 59-87

Brautigam, D. (2009), The dragon’s gift; the real story of China in Africa, Oxford University Press, U.K.

Cohen, R. (1988), The People’s Republic of China: The Human Rights Exception, Baltimore, USA

French, H. W. (2006), ‘Commentary; China and Africa’, African Affairs, 106 (422) Oxford University Press

Gao, J. (1984), “China and Africa: The Development of Relations over Many Centuries”, African Affairs 83
(331), Oxford University Press, 241-250

Guthrie, D. (2006), China and Globalization; The Social, Economic and Political Transformation of
Chinese Society, Routledge and Taylor & Francis, New York

Han-Chen, N. (1965), Resolutely Struggle Against Imperialism and Neo-Colonialism and for the Economic
Emancipation of the Afro-Asian Peoples, Foreign Language Press, Peking

Hongwu, L. (2009 a), “African Studies and ‘New Frontiers’ of China’s Academic Domain”, Liu Hongwu,
& Yang Jiemian (eds.), Fifty Years of Sino-African Cooperation: Background, Progress and Significance,
Chinese Perspectives on Sino-African Relations, Yunnan University Press, China

Hongwu, L. (2009 b), “Fifty Years of Sino-African Cooperation Relations: Background, Progress and
Significance”, Liu Hongwu & Yang Jiemian, (eds.), Fifty Years of Sino-African Cooperation: Background,
Progress and Significance, Chinese Perspectives on Sino-African Relations, Yunnan University Press,
China

Jedrzej, G. F., & Manuel, P. (2007), “A new scramble for African oil? Historical, Political, and Business
perspectives”, African Affairs 106 (423), Oxford University Press, 229-251

Lake A. and Whitman C. T. (2006), More than Humanitarianism: A Strategic U.S. Approach Towards
Africa, Report of an Independent Taskforce sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations, New York

Large, D. (2008), ‘Beyond the ‘Dragon in the Bush’: the Study of China-Africa Relations”, African Affairs,
107 (426), Oxford University Press, 45-61

Legum, C. (1965), ‘Peking’s Strategic Priorities’, Africa Report, 10 (1)

Lessing, P. (1962), Africa’s Red Harvest, Michael Joseph Publishers, London

McCurry, J., & Kollewe, J. (2011), The Guardian, [online] Available:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/feb/14/china-second-largest-economy (Date accessed;
12/12/2012)

Mohan, G. (2008), ‘China in Africa: A Review Essay’, Review of African Political Economy, 35 (1)

Navarro, P. (2011), Death by China, Confronting the Dragon- A call to action for the Western World,
Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey

Rotberg, R. I. (ed.) (2008), China into Africa; Trade, Aid and Influence, Brookings Institution Press,
Washington, D.C.

Scalapino, R. (1964), ‘On the Trail of Chou En-Lai in Africa’, Rand Corporation

9

Vol.7, 2013

Snow, P. (1995), “China and Africa: Consensus and Camouflage”, Thompson W. Robinson & David
Shambaugh (eds.), Chinese Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice, Oxford, UK

Tareq, Y. I. (1971), “The People’s Republic of China and Africa”, Journal of Modern African Studies 9 (4),
Cambridge University Press, 507-529

Taylor, I. (1998), “China’s Foreign Policy towards Africa in the 1990s”, The Journal of Modern African
Studies 36 (3), Cambridge University Press, 443-460

Taylor, I. (2008), “Sino-African Relations and the Problems of Human Rights”, African Affairs, 107 (426),
Oxford University Press, 63-87

Tull, D.M. (2006), “China’s Engagement in Africa: Scope, Significance and Consequences”, Journal of
Modern African Studies 44 (3), Cambridge University Press, 459-479

Wang, X. (2009), “Sino-Africa Political Cooperation: Approaching Common Revival and Development”,
Liu Hongwu & Yang Jiemian, (eds.), Fifty Years of Sino-African Cooperation: Background, Progress and
Significance, Chinese Perspectives on Sino-African Relations, Yunnan University Press, China, 323-331

Wikipedia encyclopedia [online] Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_and_the_United_Nations
(Date accessed; 10/12/2012)

Acknowledgements
The author sincerely thanks the anonymous reviewers and Dr. Femi Edun for the stimulating discussions
and helpful comments on the earlier draft.

About the author
Okeke Tochukwu I., is a doctoral candidate in the School of History and Culture at the Central China
Normal University, Wuhan, P.R. China. His research areas include Sino-Africa relations, International
Diplomacy and African History. He holds a teaching position in the Department of History, University
of Abuja, F.C.T. Abuja, Nigeria.

10

This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science,
Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access
Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is
Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.

More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage:
http://www.iiste.org

CALL FOR PAPERS

The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and
collaborating with academic institutions around the world. There’s no deadline for
submission. Prospective authors of IISTE journals can find the submission
instruction on the following page: http://www.iiste.org/Journals/

The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified
submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the
readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than
those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the
journals is also available upon request of readers and authors.

IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners

EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open
Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial
Library , NewJour, Google Scholar

Africa and the ascendancy of modern china in international

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to Africa and the ascendancy of modern china in international

More from Alexander Decker

Africa and the ascendancy of modern china in international