An research paper

A WHOLE NEW BALLGAME: HOW FANTASY SPORTS

HAS EVOLVED IN THE MASS MEDIA

by

DANIEL FREMON WOODWARD

Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of

The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment

of the Requirements

for the Degree of

MASTER OF ARTS IN COMMUNICATION

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON

August 2005

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

First I must acknowledge Monica, my wife and best friend, who made this

process bearable. Your patience was essential, your calming voice was crucial, and your

motivation was vital. I could not have completed this process without your unstinting

support.

Dr. Andrew Clark, your leadership and vision shaped this project into something

of which I can be proud. You helped me understand my research from its formative

stages through completion, and at times understood what I was doing better than I did.

You were a model chairman, and I’m fortunate to have worked with you. Dr. Paul

Schrodt, thank you not only for your input but also your insight. You’ll be missed at

UTA. Dr. Alisa White, you have been an exemplary committee member, professor, and

adviser. U.T. Tyler is in good hands!

Thanks also to Dr. Tom Christie for your research expertise, which guided me

throughout. Special thanks to Dr. Earl Andresen, Dr. Tom Ingram, Dr. Charla Markham

Shaw (a Stephenville girl who made good), Dr. Karin McCallum, Dr. Quint Randle, Dr.

Ivana Segvic, and my fellow graduate students for the contributions you all made along

the way.

And, of course, my gratitude goes to all the subjects for taking time to be

interviewed.

July 12, 2005

iii

ABSTRACT

A WHOLE NEW BALLGAME: HOW FANTASY SPORTS

HAS EVOLVED IN THE MASS MEDIA

Publication No. ______

Daniel Fremon Woodward, M.A.

The University of Texas at Arlington, 2005

Supervising Professor: Dr. Andrew M. Clark

Fantasy sports, a game that allows players to run their own virtual sports

franchise, has been considered a hobby enjoyed outside the cultural mainstream. But

recent adoption of fantasy sports-related content in the mass media has increasingly made

fantasy sports widely accepted. This exploratory study, uses an inductive, qualitative

approach, to examine how fantasy sports has evolved in the mass media in seven

categories: awareness, interest, testing, adoption, use, benefits, and future projections.

Fantasy sports is shown to be more prevalent in the mass media now than ever before,

and different media use fantasy sports in different ways but always in accordance with

iv

their existing strategies. Though fantasy sports is seen in all forms of mass media, it is

best suited for the Web; therefore, the Web is seen as the most advantageous medium for

fantasy-related content. Finally, these results are discussed in light of Rogers’ diffusion

of innovations theory.

v

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................. iii

ABSTRACT................................................................................................................... iv

Chapter

1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1

1.1 Commercial Media and Content Decisions ........................................... 2

1.1.1 Content Decisions for Print Media ............................................. 4

1.1.2 Content Decisions for Cable and Broadcast Media .................... 5

1.1.3 Content Decisions for the World Wide Web ............................. 7

1.2 Fantasy Sports......................................................................................... 8

1.2.1 A Brief History of Fantasy Sports ............................................. 9

1.2.2 An Explanation of Fantasy Sports ........................................... 10

1.2.3 The Economics of Fantasy Sports............................................ 10

1.2.4 Types of Fantasy Sports........................................................... 11

1.2.5 Who Plays Fantasy Sports?...................................................... 12

1.2.6 The Life of a Fantasy Sports Player.......................................... 13

1.3 Mass Media and Fantasy Sports ........................................................... 14

1.4 Fantasy Sports in Academic Studies.................................................... 15

1.5 Popular Culture as Mass Media Content ............................................. 18

1.6 Research Question ............................................................................... 20

2. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................ 22

vi

2.1 Qualitative Versus Quantitative Methods.............................................. 22

2.1.1 The Benefit of Qualitative-Style Research .............................. 22

2.1.2 Description of Various Qualitative Methods ........................... 23

2.2 Participants........................................................................................... 24

2.2.1 Internet ..................................................................................... 24

2.2.2 Print.......................................................................................... 25

2.2.3 Broadcasting ............................................................................ 27

2.2.4 Additional Sources................................................................... 28

2.3 Interview Procedure ............................................................................... 28

3. RESULTS ...................................................................................................... 31

3.1 Themes of Fantasy Sports Content in Mass Media ............................. 31

3.1.1 Awareness ................................................................................ 31

3.1.2 Interest...................................................................................... 33

3.1.3 Testing the Market ................................................................... 36

3.1.4 Adoption of Fantasy Sports Content........................................ 38

3.1.5 Use of Fantasy Sports Content................................................. 42

3.1.6 Benefits of Fantasy Sports Content.......................................... 49

3.1.7 Future of Fantasy Sports .......................................................... 50

4. DISCUSSION ................................................................................................ 53

4.1 Review of Results ................................................................................ 53

4.2 Theoretical Connection.......................................................................... 55

4.2.1 Landmark Studies in Diffusion of Innovations........................ 56

4.2.2 Studies Related to Communication.......................................... 57

vii

4.3 Limitations ............................................................................................ 59

4.4 Suggestions for Future Research .......................................................... 60

4.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................ 60

Appendix

A. DESCRIPTION OF INTERVIEW PROTOCOL ................................................ 62

B. SAMPLE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS............................................................... 65

C. INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS ........................................................................... 68

REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 121

BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION............................................................................ 129

viii

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

Since the early nineteenth century, when sports content first appeared in the mass

media, sports journalism has been diversionary in nature; valued as entertainment rather

than as hard news (Whitlam & Preston 1998; Majumdar 2003; Carvalho 2004). This is

because sports journalism, especially non-event coverage, is often speculative, subjective,

or based on rumor (Whitlam & Preston 1998). For example a paper might include a story

about which player on the hometown team is likely to be traded, or which player might

be traded for (O’Brien 2005). The story may be completely speculative, yet it is an

important part of most sports fans daily diet of information. On the sports page, fact and

opinion often appear side-by-side. For example sports columnists offer their take on a

pitcher’s performance alongside a game story (Buck 2005). Another important part of

the sports page, or the sports broadcast, is statistics, where fans can see at a glance where

a team or individual stands in any number of categories depending on the sport. These

statistics may interest sports fans in general, but they have particular value to a select

group of sports enthusiasts: the fantasy sports player. In fact, fantasy sports players may

only read the sports pages or watch sporting events on television to get information for

their fantasy teams (Todd et al. 2003).

Fantasy sports is a game, typically played on Internet sites, that allows individuals

to play the role of owner and manager of a virtual sports franchise. As fantasy sports has

become a more popular social pastime, the mass media have begun incorporating it into

their content to the extent that journalists’ observations about their own fantasy teams

1

have become accepted as sports journalism. Stories concerning the spread of fantasy

sports and its social and economic implications have begun appearing as news content.

Despite the increase of fantasy sports-related content in the mass media, much

less is known about the evolution of such content or how industry professionals make

decisions regarding such content. The present study’s purpose, then, is to explore how

fantasy sports has evolved in the mass media. In order to study this, one must consider

first how the mass media evaluates suitable content.

1.1 Commercial Media and Content Decisions

The mass media constantly search for ways to attract and retain audiences. The

more people who watch a television show or read a newspaper, the more revenue those

media can potentially bring in from advertisers. The relationship between media

companies and their audience is governed by economics (Straubhaar & LaRose 2002).

Campbell (2003) notes that media spare no expense in studying audiences and working to

capture their attention. How successfully they do so is measured through ratings,

subscriptions, rack sales, or hit counts (Stovall 2004; Mencher 2003; Wimmer &

Dominick 2003; Eastman & Ferguson 2002). Maintaining large audience numbers, no

matter how they are measured, means increased advertising sales and, thus, increased

profits. Mass media companies feel economic pressures because, like any other

capitalistic enterprise, their primary objective is financial success (Mencher 2003).

In a highly competitive media environment, with many different products from

which to choose, audiences have become finicky and discerning (Straubhaar & LaRose

2002). Therefore, everything media do targets a specific audience (or audiences), and the

nature of that audience may be the most important influence on media (Mencher, 2003).

2

Eastman and Ferguson (2002) state that understanding the targeted audience is the critical

factor in selecting content, and audiences first and foremost want to be entertained and

informed. The media cater to audiences in many ways, including what stories they select

and how they present them (Wilber & Miller 2003), how they edit and interpret these

stories (de Beer & Merrill 2004), or by employing popular cultural fads into their content

(Eastman & Ferguson 2002). In fact, Straubhaar and LaRose (2002) state that some

theorists consider communication and culture indispensable to one another.

Jeff Catlin (interview by author, 20 April 2005, Arlington, Texas), a radio

programming director since 1992, said the media must be sensitive to consumer interests

when making content decisions. In order to do this, media companies must be cognizant

of their consumers’ desires. Thus, companies administer surveys via e-mail or telephone,

host public focus groups, track industry trends, monitor social and marketplace changes,

as well as changes in their competition. In Catlin’s words: “We have to please our

listeners. My job is to deliver ratings. If we’re broadcasting to nobody, they’ll shut us

down.”

Editors, programming directors, and other decision-makers follow a similar

pattern in selecting news content: (a) find what is new or unusual; (b) inform, educate,

and entertain their target audience; (c) and satisfy their audience’s desires (Mencher

2003). Mencher (2003) identified this set of factors that editors and programmers

consider when selecting news content: timeliness, impact, prominence, proximity,

conflict, unusualness, currency, and necessity. However, Mencher (2003) also stated that

news content is relative from one audience to the next based on personal factors,

economic pressures, competition, owner influence, and tradition. Therefore, what

3

content the media choose to publish or air depends upon what audience they are

attempting to reach. It requires balancing audience preferences and needs with industry

strategies (Eastman & Ferguson 2002).

Mencher (2003) further posits that the audience is a crucial factor in deciding

upon content. For example, magazines aimed at teenage girls may feature articles on

depression, Spanish-language newspapers may focus on issues of immigration, and the

San Francisco press may include or more prominently display stories about gay and

lesbian issues (Mencher 2003).

In addition, Wilber and Miller (2003) state that different media consider different

criteria when making content decisions. For example, an event may be included on the

nightly newscast but ignored by local newspapers. Content that works in one medium

may not work in another (Wilber & Miller 2003). Thus, the next section considers the

strategies involved in making content decisions for different types of media, beginning

with print media.

1.1.1 Content Decisions for Print Media

Dating back to the mid-1600s, newspapers are one of the oldest mass media, with

dailies appearing as early as 1702 (Wilber & Miller 2003). Early editors focused on

foreign news, commercial, and economic reports (Straubhaar & LaRose 2002), but

coverage soon shifted to local news and politics (Wilber & Miller 2003). Circulation for

most papers was just a few hundred readers, and political censorship was almost

universally a reality (Wilber & Miller 2003).

Print monopolized mass media for 350 years (Wilber & Miller 2003). The arrival

of broadcast in the early twentieth century changed things, and new technologies, such as

4

cable and satellite networks and the Internet of the late twentieth century, continue to

change how print editors fill their pages so that today’s commercial print mass media

looks much different. According to Wilber and Miller (2003), newspapers are redefining

their definition of news in order to combat sagging circulation numbers. Likewise, Rich

(2005) stated that the definition of news is evolving and that newspapers “have to serve

[their] audience with content and information they want in whatever form they want” (p.

16). For example, in order to compete with newer forms of mass media, which often

offer speedier delivery of the news, newspaper and magazines have opened bureaus

across the world, embedded correspondents in the middle of news events, and even

staked controlling interest in rival media (Wilber & Miller 2003). Magazines have

become more specialized in order to attract a narrower, more niche readership, while

modern newspapers tend to focus more on civic or digital journalism (Wilber & Miller

2003).

These are print media’s efforts to give their audience what it wants. Broadcast

and cable media face different realities because their audiences, strategies, and

technologies are unlike those in print media.

1.1.2 Content Decisions for Cable and Broadcast Media

Since the development of broadcast and cable, stations and networks have looked

for ways to attract and retain audiences with their programming. Eastman and Ferguson

(2002) note that

In the media world, programming is the software that gives
the hardware a reason for existing. Both are necessary for
the system to work, but without programming, no
broadcasting or wired services would exist. Programmers
sincerely believe that “content is king” (p. 4).

5

Eastman and Ferguson (2002) state that programming can be considered either an

outcome (i.e., a programming schedule on radio or television) or a process (i.e., selecting,

scheduling and promoting the programs). Despite this dichotomy, however, “at its basic

level, programming represents individual shows (programs) that people choose” (p. 5).

Jeff Catlin (personal communication, April 20, 2005), radio programming director of

KTCK-Dallas, states that broadcasters, regardless of content, must recognize and cater to

their audience’s primary interests. However, this becomes difficult given competition for

audience attention from rival networks and other media, such as the Internet. Catlin

further states that instant access afforded by the Internet and, to a lesser extent broadcast,

means media users often know as much as the media themselves. As Catlin contends,

“That’s part of the evolution of the format. Everybody gets a lot more information now

than they ever did before, and information overload makes everybody have ADD

[attention deficit disorder]. That’s made our job even harder.” Therefore, programmers

must find creative ways to overcome these challenges by providing programming that

builds a strong audience and will, in turn, generate advertising revenue (Eastman &

Ferguson 2002).

One such method involves focusing on narrowcasting over broadcasting; that is,

targeting particular audiences based upon niche characteristics such as sex, religion, race,

or hobby without regard to increasing audience size (Straubhaar and LaRose 2002). This

is particularly evident in cable, with networks including Black Entertainment Television,

Women’s Entertainment, and The History Channel. Even a network such as ESPN,

which focuses on sports, is able to narrow its focus with ESPN 2, ESPN Classic, ESPN

News, and ESPN U. Narrowcasting allows media companies to find profits while

6

targeting smaller audiences because that audience is more receptive to the message. Such

a practice makes advertising messages more effective because they reach only a

specifically targeted audience. Therefore narrowcasting represents an industry trend that

is growing in popularity (Straubhaar & LaRose 2002).

Despite the market potential of narrowcasting, a new threat for audience attention

has come from a different medium. The rise of the Internet, beginning in the late

twentieth century, has presented new challenges for media because it has changed the

way people get their news (Rich 2005).

1.1.3 Content Decisions for the World Wide Web

Web-based media are unique from print and cable/broadcast because of their

capacity of interactivity. The dominant characteristic of the Internet is its ability to

deliver information quickly and directly (Straubhaar & LaRose 2002). Stovall (2004)

believes the audience—not the journalist—reigns supreme because “personalization is

intrinsic to new media [and] the user, after all, is in the best position to know what he or

she finds most interesting, valuable, useful, and newsworthy” (p. 47). The Internet

differs from other media because it puts the user in the driver’s seat; therefore, Web-

based content requires more planning and organization and allows for more risks than

print or broadcast (Rich 2005).

Wilber and Miller (2003) note that good journalism is the same for any medium,

and Web journalists still should “write like journalists” (p. 207). However, that does not

mean Web content is like content in other media. The Web allows for content that is

nonlinear and more personal, and traditional copy deadlines and spatial considerations do

not apply to the Web (Stovall 2004). Ron Cariker, a Web journalist, (interview by

7

author, 1 June 2005, Arlington, Texas) acknowledges that anything that is in the local

newspaper would be on his site (www.NewsOK.com), but uncut versions may run online

because the paper is limited on space. Stovall (2004) states that because the Web is more

versatile than print or broadcast/cable, more possibilities exist for presenting content than

in the other media.

Different audiences may interpret identical media content in different ways

(Campbell 2003). Regardless, all media aim their content at attracting the largest possible

target audience (Straubhaar & LaRose 2002). One method by which media accomplish

this is by incorporating popular culture into their content (McQuail 1985). One example

of how popular culture has influenced media content to varying degrees is fantasy sports,

which is the focus of the present study. The remainder of this chapter discusses in more

detail fantasy sports, from its inception as a game among some friends to its current status

as a billion-dollar industry that is changing the definition of sports journalism.

1.2 Fantasy Sports

Fantasy sports hobbyists draft real players for their fictional team. Those players’

statistics from actual games determine which team in a fantasy league is doing the best.

Winners typically receive cash or prizes (Isidore 2003). Fantasy sports offers a base of

some fifteen million Americans spending $1.5 billion on league subscription fees, draft

kits, and other items (Fantasy Sports Trade Association [FSTA] 2003; Ipsos 2003). Ladd

Biro (interview by author, 3 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas), whose syndicated column

about fantasy football appears in newspapers from Dallas to Pittsburgh, observed that

mass media companies have begun including fantasy sports as content, or at a minimum

including references to fantasy sports in sports news, like never before. Noting a similar

8

trend, Umstead (2003) states that fantasy sports has become a fixture in mainstream

media programming because of the large numbers of 18- to 34-year-olds who play

fantasy sports. This clientele, in turn, provides an attractive demographic for commercial

mass media because of their disposable income, spending power, and mobility. The

following sections elaborate further on this “cultural obsession” Ballard (2004, p. 1),

known as fanatsy sports.

1.2.1 A Brief History of Fantasy Sports

What began as a lark among eleven friends in Manhattan has become a worldwide

fascination. Indeed, journalist Daniel Okrent could not have imagined the growth of

fantasy sports when he conceptualized fantasy baseball during a 1979 cross-country flight

(Wendel 2004). Okrent’s idea was to augment the upcoming season for himself and 10

friends, who believed they could run a Major League Baseball franchise better than the

real-life general managers of the teams they followed. The group of mostly writers and

advertising executives called their new association the Rotisserie League in honor of the

Manhattan restaurant where they wrote the league’s rules and constitution (Tygiel 2000).

The Rotisserie Leaguers quickly became the first fantasy addicts. They rushed to

the morning paper to check box scores. Once a week, Okrent drove forty miles roundtrip

to pick up The Sporting News so he could compile league standings, although the

publication would arrive at his home a day later. The sports writers in the group would

even call Major League offices to get injury updates on the players they owned (Tygiel

2000). Today most leagues are maintained on Web sites such as ESPN.com,

SportsLine.com, Yahoo.com, and even official league Web sites like NFL.com or

9

MLB.com. More than any other innovation, the Internet has facilitated the widespread

popularity of fantasy sports and has made it profitable (Felps 2000).

1.2.2 An Explanation of Fantasy Sports

In forming a fantasy league hobbyists come together to compete against each

other throughout the season. “Owners” draft players from real-life professional sports

teams and score points based upon those athlete’s performances in actual games. For

example, if Player A drafts baseball star Barry Bonds for his fantasy team, Player A’s

fantasy team is credited with a home run for each home run Barry Bonds actually hits.

The more home runs—and other statistics—Bonds and Player A’s other players compile,

the more successful Player A’s fantasy team will be. Fantasy league formats vary, so that

in some the hobbyists compete head-to-head in games that last one day or one week, and

in others, points are compiled over a full season (FSTA 2003).

One person in each league serves as the “commissioner” and oversees the entire

league, including everything from organizing and drafting, to scoring and transactions.

Most leagues are maintained on Internet sites that allow hobbyists to make lineup updates

or check league standings and statistics instantly (Berentson 2000; Felps 2000).

1.2.3 The Economics of Fantasy Sports

While fantasy sports has become profitable for those media organizing the various

leagues, it also costs companies money. Two-thirds of fantasy participants admit to

checking their fantasy teams at work (Suttell 2004), and the outplacement company

Challenger, Gray, and Christmas estimated that American companies lose almost $37

million in productivity per day because of it (Baker 2004).

10

If companies lose money because of fantasy sports, so, too, might unlucky fantasy

participants. Though officially classified by the Internal Revenue Service as a game of

chance and not a gambling industry, fantasy hobbyists typically pay to play in hopes of

winning larger payouts (Ballard 2004). Only a few win, but they might win big. One

famous Las Vegas-based league, the National Fantasy Baseball Championship, requires a

$1,250 entry fee; indeed the average entry fee per league is $95, with the typical

winnings ranging from $300 to $400 (Ballard 2004; Suttell 2004).

Fantasy league champions are not the only ones profiting. Wirakartakusumah

(2003) found that media companies recognize fantasy sports as potentially profitable, and

Berentson (2000) notes that one popular fantasy-oriented Web site, Sandbox.com,

enjoyed revenues of nearly $7 million in 2000 after grossing just $200,000 two years

earlier. Other similar Web sites have been sold to investors for as much as $20 million.

CBS-owned SportsLine.com increased its profits by more than one-third from 2002 to

2003 thanks to fantasy sports (Ballard 2004). Overall, online media bring in an estimated

$500 million annually because of fantasy sports (Umstead 2003). Corporate America has

taken notice, too. Callaway Golf Company, a publicly held corporation manufacturing

golf clubs and other golf equipment, launched a Fantasy Golf Challenge in March 2005

asking participants to spend $9.95 and select golfers they believe will win predetermined

match-ups. The top performers each week receive prizes such as golf balls, custom-made

clubs, or golf-related vacations (Callaway 2005).

1.2.4 Types of Fantasy Sports

If a fantasy golf game seems remarkable, consider that hobbyists can also play

fantasy auto racing, bass fishing, soccer, cricket, horseracing, rodeo, hot-rodding, and

11

more (Multimedia Publisher 2002; Ballard 2004; Iole 2004; Thé 2004). Web journalist

Ron Cariker (interview by author, 1 June 2005, Arlington, Texas) said his NewsOK.com

site includes fantasy-style games for amateur sports, such as National Collegiate Athletic

Association (NCAA) football and basketball, as well as local high school football.

However, National Football League (NFL) football is king, with 93% of fantasy

players participating on the virtual gridiron. More than 60% play fantasy baseball, while

other sports account for 30% of the market or less (Ballard 2004; Tedeschi 2003).

Understandably, the NFL has fueled the fire, launching a promotional campaign before

the 2003 season. In one commercial, New York Giants superstar Michael Strahan

addressed fantasy sports owners in a post-game press conference, as though it were an

actual NFL game (Wendel 2004).

1.2.5 Who Plays Fantasy Sports?

The appeal of fantasy sports spread quickly as mass media began to notice it. The

first widely publicized articles were written by Rotisserie founder Daniel Okrent himself,

but journalists at Harvard Magazine and People, which in 1981 called fantasy sports “the

hottest craze to hit the national pastime since trading cards,” lent more wide-spread

credence (Tygiel 2000).

The Rotisserie Leaguers published a “how-to” guidebook in 1984, and the craze

was born. Celebrities, including politicians, musicians, and actors began drafting fantasy

teams (Tygiel 2000; Wendel 2004). During a trip to China, television newsman Bryant

Gumbel made frequent calls home to check on his fantasy baseball league (Tygiel 2000).

Professional athletes play, too; former Major League outfielder Dwight Evans once

traded the fantasy version of himself for a late-season boost in pitching (Ballard 2004).

12

1.2.6 The Life of a Fantasy Sports Player

Fanball.com, a Web site creating software for fantasy league participants,

conducted a 1999 study on fantasy sports demographic. Evidently, 15% of U.S. adults

(those over age 18) engage in fantasy sports. The vast majority (93%) of fantasy players

are men (Ballard 2004). The average gamer has played for six years and spends six to 15

hours per week monitoring his or her 2.4 teams (Flood 2004). Eighty-five percent

frequently visit sports-related Internet sites and have readily available Web access (Felps

2000). Those who play fantasy sports online are younger and more educated than other

Internet users and are nearly 50% more likely to have a household income of greater than

$100,000 (Tedeschi 2003). Not surprisingly, they also watch more sports. A typical

NFL fan watches 6.6 hours of games and analysis each week; by comparison, a fantasy

football player watches 8.4 (Deford 2002). Some gamers say they would not follow real

sports so closely if not for their fantasy teams (Wendel 2004).

Fantasy sports enthusiasts typically watch more televised sporting events in order

to monitor how their teams are doing in real time and typically care more about the

performance of an individual player than about whether their favorite team wins or loses

(Deford 2002; Wendel 2004). Besides real-time statistics, fantasy gamers search for

player news including injuries and transactions, weather reports, and probable starters

(USA Today 2004). Reasons for participating in fantasy sports include bragging rights,

cash payoffs, or even Super Bowl-style championship rings (Kilen 2004; Jostens 2004).

Winners of an NFL league, sponsored by electronics retailer Best Buy, took home

$20,000 worth of store merchandise (Tedeschi 2003). Despite these tangible rewards,

however, most say they play for nothing more than bragging rights and camaraderie

13

(Kilen 2004). No matter why one chooses to play, the mass media are determined to

keep them tuned in and employ a variety of ways to do so.

1.3 Mass Media and Fantasy Sports

Unlike stories traditionally found in the sports section, Ladd Biro’s column in The

Dallas Morning News offers little in the way of news, personality profiles, or game

coverage (Biro 2004). Charles Polansky’s work at the Fort Worth Star-Telegram is

similar (Polansky 2003). Instead, their columns speculate on which players might be

fantasy studs or duds, whom they should trade away or trade for, whom they should start

or bench, or how to win a fantasy league (Biro 2004; Polansky 2003). Both the Star-

Telegram and The Morning News have also run news stories related to fantasy sports, as

have many major newspapers including USA Today and The New York Times (Cummings

1998; Felps 2000; Hiestand 2002; Tedeschi 2003). Recently, the Des Moines Register

spent an entire fall following the fantasy football season of a 34-year-old local named

James Kelsh (Kilen 2004).

Among cable media, ESPN has added fantasy elements to its highly rated

“SportsCenter” and “NFL Live” shows, as well as other mainstream programs, because

they cannot ignore the fantasy fan (Choi 2002; Ulmstead 2003). EchoStar, which

provides the Dish Network satellite system, began an interactive fantasy-style game

available through a Dish channel (EDNet.com 2003). Cable channels Spike TV, The

Football Network, and The NFL Network have all launched half-hour shows dedicated

entirely to fantasy football, with varying degrees of success (Ulmstead 2003).

Traditional news-first organizations are also using their Web sites to push fantasy

content. CNN runs daily fantasy fodder through its Web site (sportsillustrated.com,

14

2005). America Online, Yahoo!, and CBS have boosted fantasy content on their Web

sites in recent years (Ballard 2004). Fantasy sports has become so widely accepted in the

mainstream press that the Newspaper Association of America called SportsLine.com’s

strategy to make its fantasy games free to users “one of the year’s top achievements” in

the media in 2002 (Runett 2002, p. 1).

Fantasy sports permeates the popular media, with articles focusing on everything

from the popularity and economics of the game, to its impact on sports fans, to the

technological interface behind the Web sites (e.g., Cummings 1998; Felps 2000; Ballard

2004; Wendel 2004). As a result of this growing interest in fantasy-sports content across

all forms of mass media, scholars have begun to examine this topic.

1.4 Fantasy Sports in Academic Studies

Although widespread throughout popular culture, fantasy sports has appeared in

academic research only sparingly over the last decade. Despite the large population of

hobbyists and the amount of money they spend, researchers have yet to study the

evolution of fantasy sports in the mass media. What has been studied ranges across

disciplines, from economics to rhetoric to kinesiology.

In one of the earliest studies of fantasy sports, Hiltner and Walker (1996)

analyzed the qualitative content of messages posted on the electronic bulletin board of a

Web-based fantasy provider during a period when the games were inaccessible (n = 846).

Unable to monitor their fantasy teams for nineteen hours because of technological issues,

hobbyists posted message after message to vent or rant against the provider. Hiltner and

Walker argued that these hobbyists consciously and willingly formed a virtual

15

community during the technological breakdown that faded once access to their teams was

restored.

While Hiltner and Walker suggested that fantasy players show addict-like

withdrawal symptoms, Shipman (2001) stated that fantasy players are at least halfway

grounded in reality. According to Shipman, fantasy sports hobbyists are unique from

participants in other role-playing games because they have one foot in the real world (i.e.,

to follow games, sports news, etc.) and another in a virtual world (i.e., to update their

fantasy teams accordingly). Thus, Shipman believes that player control and external

control share equal weight in “opportunities for more engaging and immersive forms of

entertainment” (p. 9). After analyzing the content of advertising language on the most

popular fantasy Web sites, Shipman posited that hobbyists are attracted to a feeling of

power, social and financial rewards, and entertainment.

Rowell (2003) takes a much different approach. He relied on the Game Theory of

Economics to examine popular fantasy baseball drafting strategies. Rowell found

advantages and disadvantages to each method, descriptions of which he retrieved from

popular Web sites such as drafthelp.com and addictfantasysports.com, and developed a

new theory-based draft strategy “to better maximize the potential profits from the

auction” (p. 6).

In a similar vein, Wirakartakusmah (2003) adopted an economic approach in

looking at fantasy sports, although in a more experimental and less theoretical way.

Wirakartakusmah divided 150 Web sites that offered sports-related content into two

groups—those that offer fantasy sports and those that did not. Those sites that offer

fantasy sports saw a direct relationship between the amount of money they spend to

16

maintain their sites and their total profits, while no such relationship existed for non-

fantasy sports sites. Wirakartakusmah hypothesized, therefore, that fantasy sports is a

moneymaking venture for Web sites that already offer some sports-related content.

This study is particularly relevant considering Todd et al.’s (2003) research, in

which a population of fantasy hobbyists consumed media in excess. These researchers

found a direct correlation between fantasy sports participation and the amount of media

consumed per hour. Specifically, gamers spent more time watching television sports

shows, reading the sports section and sports magazines, listening to sports radio, and

surfing among sports-related Internet sites than sports fans who did not participate in a

fantasy league. Such information is useful to programming directors. As Choi (2002)

noted in a content analysis of ESPN broadcasts, the network already accommodates

fantasy hobbyists by including fantasy-relevant information in its crawlers and as

material for its popular hour-long sports-news program, SportsCenter.

While fantasy sports-related habits may be measurable, hobbyists’ motives for

joining fantasy leagues are not. Cooper (2004) developed the Fantasy Sports Participant

Motivation Scale and applied it to a population of fantasy sports players of varying ages.

Ultimately he deemed it impossible to generalize why fantasy players choose to

participate in the hobby. No matter why fantasy users play, Flood (2004) fears that their

participation in fantasy sports comes at the exclusion of other forms of entertainment.

Flood found that fantasy participants averaged fifteen hours per week updating their

teams and watching real-life games in order to follow their players in real time. In doing

so, these hobbyists spent less time in the gym and on the ball field, and, thus, according

to Flood, virtual activity has superseded physical activity.

17

A noticeable gap is evident in the literature: Most studies, though different in

writing and approach, take a user-centered approach. With Wirakartakushmah (2003) as

the lone exception, a void of industry-centered research exists. No previous study

explores how fantasy sports evolved across mass media, rather each addresses fantasy

sports without examining its development or putting fantasy sports in the context of mass

media studies. The present study is unique in that regard.

1.5 Popular Culture as Mass Media Content

The vast majority of scholarship related to mass media and culture examines the

effects of mass media in a cultural context. For example, several studies explore

advertising’s effect on female body image (Tuchman 1978; Ferguson 1983; Myers &

Biocca 1992; Fallon, Katzman, & Wooley 1994; Groesz, Levine, & Murnen 2002) or

whether violent programming fosters violence in children (Maccoby 1963; Markowitz,

Grossman, & Page 1998; Strasburger & Donnerstein 2000; Villani 2001; Strasburger &

Wilson 2002). Contrary to these lines of research, the present study examines how mass

media incorporate existing culture fads, trends, and phenomena into their content.

Rouse’s (1978) historical study detailed how radio shows of the 1920s-30s

catered specifically to homemakers and housewives. Rouse stated that the programming

director’s primary objectives vis-à-vis the housewives were to “entertain, teach, help

raise children, offer conversation, and [discuss] cooking and shopping” (p. 316). Turow

(1982) found that two publishers of children’s books often rely on the stereotypical ideas

of children, rather than on research specific to actual children, when deciding upon

content. On the other hand, Blair (1993) stated that the mass media industry became all

too aware of the hip-hop culture and its value in reaching younger consumers. The result

18

of incorporating this culture into content has paid huge dividends for corporations

through direct marketing, narrowcasting music channels and niche-market magazines,

and Web sites loaded with hip-hop references and hip-hop-related content.

McComas, Shanahan, and Butler (2001) found that television programmers

typically ignore environmental issues as part of their shows’ content because society as a

whole cares little about such content. In fact, the number of references to a clean

environment and other environmental values has decreased since the first Earth Day in

1971 (McComas, Shanahan, & Butler 2001). Programmers do, however, include content

about which the public cares. Waldfogel (2001) used the Scarborough Prime Next

dataset, U.S. Census statistics, and survey measures to examine how viewers’ race affects

their satisfaction with broadcast television, as measured by the tendency to watch a

particular network. He found that a population’s typical viewing habits and dominant

race are directly related, and that networks broadcast programs specifically with race in

mind. Simiarly, LaFollette (2002) found that television programming directors in the

1940s and 1950s used science and space to attract viewers, corresponding with the

cultural fascination with a fledgling space program.

Misinformation about a medium’s target audience, however, can lead network

programmers astray. Ha and Chan-Olmstead (2002) concluded that Enhanced TV, the

technological blend of network television and the Internet, failed because programming

directors did not take into account cultural e-commerce habits. Enhanced TV asked users

to purchase merchandise featured on the networks’ Web sites, but consumers either were

not interested in purchasing products via e-commerce that they could purchase offline, or

they were disinterested in the products the networks were selling. Ha and Chan-

19

Olmstead suggested the networks revisit Enhanced TV with more regard to consumer

interest.

As illustrated from the beginning of this study, mass media decision-makers must

keep culture in mind in order to be successful. One method through which they do that is

incorporating popular culture into their content. In sports journalism, fantasy sports has

become an increasingly popular way to do that because it appeals to a broad, passionate

audience who is willing to spend money on fantasy sports-related material.

1.6 Research Question

As it becomes more prevalent in both popular culture and mass media, fantasy

sports is becoming a topic of academic scholarship, including studies of mass media and

communication. Despite the few studies that have examined fantasy sports, researchers

have yet to explore how fantasy sports has evolved in the mass media. Other studies

have explored the advantages and disadvantages of media decision-makers’ cultural

awareness when deciding on programming content. The present study explores the

intersection of these two areas; that is, how the cultural phenomenon of fantasy sports has

evolved in the mass media.

Based upon the previous review of literature, the following research question

guides the present study:

RQ: How has fantasy sports evolved in the mass media?

In order to answer this question, Chapter 2 describes the methodology used in this

study, examining the differences between qualitative and quantitative instruments, and

20

introduces the subjects who are used as experts. The results of the study, based upon

interviews with the industry experts and using a constant comparison technique, are

presented in Chapter 3. Chapter 4 interprets these results in light of Rogers’ diffusion of

innovations theory and suggests directions for future research.

21

CHAPTER 2

METHODOLOGY

2.1 Qualitative Versus Quantitative Methods

The present study relies on in-depth, qualitative interviews with mass media

professionals in order to further understand the evolution of fantasy sports in the mass

media. Interview subjects came from print, broadcast (both radio and television), cable,

and Internet media.

2.1.1 The Benefit of Qualitative-Style Research

McCraken (1988) states that “qualitative research does not survey the terrain, it

mines it. It is, in other words, much more intensive than extensive in its objectives” (p.

17). This is evident in the present study. Interviews with industry experts provide a

broad overview of fantasy sports’ evolution in the mass media and, rather than explaining

the trend superficially, offer a deeper look from inside the industry by providing specific

and personal examples. The major differences between quantitative and qualitative

research are the role of the researcher, the design and setting of the study, measurement

instruments, and goals of the research (Wimmer & Dominick 2003). In the present study,

qualitative research is preferable to quantitative research in order to develop depth of

insight related to the evolution of fantasy sports in mass media. While statistics reveal

how fantasy sports content affect subscriptions, ratings, or Web hits, they are less useful

for examining how fantasy sports has evolved in the mass media. It would be difficult to

develop a survey to yield the desired information because of the lack of foundational

22

knowledge to ground it since no previous studies examining the evolution of fantasy

sports in mass media exist. In-depth interviews illuminate the process, as well as provide

a basis for later survey research. A content analysis might reveal differences in mass

media sports content in the present era compared with five years ago but could not

answer why such differences exist.

2.1.2 Description of Various Qualitative Methods

According to Lindlof and Taylor (2002), qualitative research in communication

mirrors research styles in other social sciences. It is based upon the assumption that

humans interact in patterned ways, and discovery and verification are equally valued.

Various types of qualitative research prove useful in various studies. Ethnographies

allow researchers to live among and associate most personally with their research

subjects. The researcher becomes, quite literally, an insider. Observational research

means the researcher records data based upon observing his or her subjects. Case studies

give the researcher several data sources to examine real-world events, individuals, or

groups/organizations (Wimmer & Dominick 2003).

In the present study, in-depth interviews were the preferred method because they

yield an understanding of a person’s experiences and perspectives, help verify and

validate information gleaned from other references, allow actors to relate accounts in

their own words, and gather information that cannot be observed effectively (Lindlof &

Taylor 2002). Specifically, the interview subjects (a) related, in their own words,

personal experiences using or observing fantasy sports in the mass media; (b)

corroborated popular media reports such as Cummings (1998), Felps (2000), Hiestand

(2002), and Tedeschi (2003); (c) and established fantasy sports as an important topic of

23

study within mass media research. The next section describes the participants interviewed

for the study and describes their various areas of expertise relating to fantasy sports..

2.2 Participants

2.2.1 Internet

To examine fantasy sports on the Internet, David Young and Ron Cariker were

interviewed. Young’s professional life has included stops in chemical engineering, law,

and for the last eighteen months Internet journalism. Young writes a freelance fantasy

baseball column for Sports Illustrated’s Web site (www.sportsillustrated.cnn.com) and is

an editor for the popular fantasy Web site www.TalentedMrRoto.com, which covers

fantasy games in all sports. Young (interview by author, 7 June 2005, Arlington, Texas)

stated that he and his editor select his column content before the baseball season begins,

and then he amend his list as necessary during the season.

Ron Cariker is managing editor of www.NewsOK.com, an Oklahoma City-based

news Web site that combines original content with content lifted from the local

newspaper and television station. Cariker (interview by author, 1 June 2005, Arlington,

Texas) describes his responsibility as overseeing all projects and all aspects of the Web

site. Cariker has six years’ experience in journalism, including three in his current

position. NewsOK.com receives about twenty million hits per month, according to

Cariker. Someone else selects the site’s content, but Cariker is responsible for the site’s

inclusion of fantasy-style sports games.

Brendan Roberts offers expertise on both Web and print media. Roberts, a senior

editor for The Sporting News, has fourteen years’ experience in mass media, including

the last four in his current position. He has spent nine years with The Sporting News,

24

including six years covering fantasy sports. Much of Roberts’ work now appears on the

magazine’s Web site (www.sportingnews.com), but he wrote for the magazine before

switching into his current role, which enables him to comment on both media. Roberts

(interview by author, 1 June 2005, Arlington, Texas) stated that fantasy content on the

Web is decided upon by striking a balance of writers’ abilities and e-mailers’ demand.

Roberts also serves on the Board of Directors for the trade group Fantasy Sports Writers

of America.

2.2.2 Print

Further data on print media were collected from fantasy sports columnists Ladd

Biro and Charles Polansky. Ladd Biro is a syndicated columnist whose freelance work

has appeared in major newspapers such as The Dallas Morning News, the Cleveland

Plain Dealer, and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette over the last three years. He has also

contributed to The Sporting News. Biro writes exclusively on fantasy football, as

opposed to other fantasy games, because he considers himself to be an expert only on that

topic (interview by author, 3 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas). Unlike many of the other

subjects, Biro is not a journalist by trade. He runs his own marketing agency fulltime but

has played fantasy football for seven years. He approached Morning News editors about

using him to ramp up their fantasy coverage. His reputation has spread to the other

newspapers, and he hopes more papers will pick up his weekly column as well. For his

columns, Biro agrees upon an approach for content. In Dallas, he is restricted to what

players might make good free agent claims or trade bait. For example, the following is

an excerpt from a column Biro wrote about Ben Roethlisberger, the Pittsburgh Steelers’

promising rookie quarterback, in The Morning News last fall:

25

Who wouldn’t want him leading their team? I
wouldn’t. And neither should you. That is, unless you
happen to run a real NFL team. But last time I checked,
there were only 32 of them, and only a handful are regular
readers of my column. (Would you believe, just a few? Er,
none?)
When you’re talking fantasy football, Big Ben is the
poster child for mediocrity. Lucky to crack the top 20
fantasy list of fantasy passers, Roethlisberger has had just
one game with more than 200 passing yards. For Pete’s
sake, in Sunday’s win over Washington, he had his third
consecutive outing with less than 150 yards in the air! (Biro
2004, p.1).

In Cleveland, Biro is asked to recommend starters and sitters for readers’ fantasy

football teams.

Polansky, who has 10 years’ experience in journalism, including the last eight at

the Star-Telegram, spent a year and a half writing a fantasy sports column. Polansky

(interview by author, 21 June 2005, Arlington, Texas) said he had almost complete

control over the content in his fantasy column and was ahead of the curve with regard to

fantasy sports as print media content because “I was able to convince the powers-that-be

to write more generally on sports, like most fantasy sites do these days.” The following

is a sample from one of Polansky’s fantasy columns:

There’s nothing more enjoyable in fantasy sports
than sitting back at the end of the season to see you’ve
really put one over on your fellow league members,
especially if you haven’t taken home the championship.
It’s no fun to be seen by the rest of your league as a
“cheater.” It’s no fun to win your league by making a
series of lopsided deals with the weak sister of your bunch.
Scratch that. It’s fun no matter how you get there
(Polansky 2003, p. 1).

26

2.2.3 Broadcasting

Jeff Catlin has been program director for KTCK-AM, the premier all-sports talk

radio station in the Dallas market, since March 2003. He has thirteen years in radio,

including a dozen for his current station’s parent company, Susquehanna. Catlin is

responsible for all programming content and approval of paid commercials. While the

on-air personalities decide upon content for their own shows, Catlin establishes

guidelines to steer them. Catlin (interview by author, 20 April 2005, Arlington, Texas)

meets with the show hosts for critiques, coaching, and a reminder of station goals and

objectives, e.g., whether or not fantasy sports is acceptable on-air content.

Joe Trahan and Mike Hill served as experts on the television side. Trahan, a

sixteen-year veteran of television broadcasting, has been a sports anchor/sports reporter at

WFAA-TV in Dallas since 2003. He anchors the nightly sportscast at least twice per

week, and his station reaches two million households with every broadcast. That makes

WFAA the market’s top-ranked station at 5 and 6 p.m. and second at 10 p.m. When

selecting content for the broadcast, WFAA’s sports anchors work in tandem with the

executive producer and assistant sports director to decide what they want and what they

can get, all based upon station initiatives.

Mike Hill has been a sports anchor at the cable network ESPN News for almost a

year, but he has ten years’ experience overall in several markets. Hill anchors as often as

five times per week and reaches seventy million households. Hill (interview by author, 8

June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas) stated that each broadcast’s co-anchors decide upon

content and story order in conjunction with a team of producers about six hours before

each broadcast.

27

2.2.4 Additional Sources

Two additional sources provided a broader look at mass media in general. For

twelve years, Barry Horn has covered the national media at The Dallas Morning News,

the seventh largest paper in the nation and one of the oldest continually printed

publications in the Southwest. Fodder for Horn’s media column, which appears weekly,

comes from all types of mass media in markets other than Dallas. Horn (interview by

author, 27 April 2005, Arlington, Texas) stated that Morning News editors prefer he not

write about the local market because the paper’s parent company, the Dallas-based Belo

Corporation, also owns the market’s dominant television station.

David Sessions, a veteran sports reporter at the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, is

Horn’s cross-town counterpart. He began writing his weekly “Media Insider” column in

August 2004 and covers topics similar to Horn. With a circulation of 350,000, the Star-

Telegram boasts a top-twenty nationally rated sports section (Associated Press Sports

Editors 2004). Sessions personally decides the content of his column.

2.3 Interview Procedure

Although the term “interview” brings to mind the notion of questions and

answers, many noted qualitative researchers stress the importance of listening as the most

important part of the interview process. McCracken (1988) suggests the interviewer

should serve as a benign-but-active listener. And, in accordance with Lindlof and Taylor

(2002), he or she should act tactically and tactfully. Seidman (1998) stresses the

importance of the interviewer’s listening more while talking less, and Hunt and Eadie

(1987) advise the interviewer to listen, focus, and probe in order to best understand the

respondent’s message. This advice proved useful as the researcher allowed the

28

respondents to answer in full before offering follow-ups and omitted questions that

respondents answered as part of other answers, which made each interview unique. The

researcher also allowed the respondents to deviate from the topic, but brought them back

when necessary.

The organization of all interviews in the present study followed the format of a

semi-standardized interview, as defined in Berg (2004): The interviews are more or less

structured, questions may be reordered during the interview, wordings of questions are

flexible, the level of language may be adjusted, and the interviewer may answer questions

and make clarifications as needed. Generally, the same list of questions was used in each

interview, although the order varied occasionally. When interviewing David Young, for

example, many questions were asked out of planned order because Young’s responses

made a new order more logical. On several occasions, the same question was asked

using different wording in order to get specific responses from respondents. For

example, questions might have been reworded to best suit a subject’s relevant medium or

situation, such as asking about hit counts instead of circulation, or broadcasting instead of

narrowcasting.

Most local subjects were interviewed face-to-face; out-of-town subjects were

interviewed over the telephone. All subjects were interviewed independently of one

another in order to avoid “group speak,” i.e., members of the group tending to answer

questions in the same manner (Lindlof & Taylor 2002), or to avoid monopolization of the

interview, which Wimmer and Dominick (2003) describe as someone appointing himself

or herself group spokesman. All interviews were recorded on audio tape or digital

recorder and transcribed for ready access.

29

Interviews ranged from thirty to sixty minutes in length, averaging about forty-

five minutes each. Following the completion of each interview, materials from the

transcriptions were grouped by similarities as patterns emerged. Material for the

interview questions was based on, and complemented by, the researchers’ personal

observations, and secondary material from academic and popular sources. Texts

concerning the history of fantasy sports, the growth of statistics in sports, the changing of

the manner in which Americans watch sports, and user and industry demographics

provided context (Tygiel 2000; Patel 2002; Isidore 2003; Schwarz 2004; Tedeschi 2004;

Wendel 2004). The variety and depth of interviews allowed the researcher to achieve

saturation, defined by Baxter and Babbie (2004) as the point where additional interviews

yield no new information. That is to say, information gleaned from the later interviews

began to duplicate those conducted earlier. For example, several respondents interviewed

at different times shared similar narratives, such as monitoring their fantasy teams in real

time online (Barry Horn, interview by author, 27 April 2005, Arlington, Texas; Joe

Trahan, interview by author, 3 June 2005, Dallas). Common words and phrases even

appeared in several transcripts, such as referring to how sports journalism has become

“eye candy,” or content that is heavy of graphics but low on quality (David Sessions,

interview by author, 2 June 2005, Arlington, Texas; Charles Polansky, interview by

author, 21 June 2005, Arlington, Texas), or referring to fantasy players as being “geeks”

or “geeky” (Barry Horn, interview by author, 27 April 2005, Arlington, Texas; David

Young, interview by author, 7 June 2005, Arlington, Texas; Mike Hill, interview with

author, 8 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas).

30

CHAPTER 3

RESULTS

3.1 Themes of Fantasy Sports Content in Mass Media

The present study uses in-depth interviews to explore the evolution of fantasy

sports in the mass media. In order to arrange the subjects’ responses and understand how

fantasy sports has evolved in the mass media, interview transcripts were coded into seven

categories. These categories were selected because they emerged naturally based on

repeated mentions by the respondents, and they provide a logical and coherent framework

to answer the research question. The categories that emerged were (a) awareness, (b)

interest, (c) testing the market, (d) adoption, (e) use, (f) benefits, (g) and projected future

application.

3.1.1 Awareness

Awareness indicates that the respondents had knowledge of fantasy sports.

Perhaps they played fantasy sports in their spare time, or knew someone who did.

Awareness emerged in statements such as someone relating a personal experience as a

fantasy player, an anecdote about draft day, or a reference to one first learning of fantasy

sports. In analyzing the interviews, it was apparent that the concept of awareness

manifested itself differently among the respondents. Each participant was aware of

fantasy sports, regardless of whether he wanted to, or was allowed to, use it in his

content. David Sessions (interview with author, 2 June 2005, Arlington, Texas) estimates

that fantasy sports integrated into the mainstream media around 1998 or 1999, which

31

coincides with large mass media companies such as ESPN introducing their own Web-

based fantasy games. However, most respondents said they became aware of fantasy

sports (i.e., they played or someone they knew played) before 1998, in some cases long

before 1998. Their awareness came at different times and in different ways.

Mike Hill (interview with author, 8 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas) recalled his

first exposure to fantasy sports:

I show up for draft day, and there were guys who were
taking it so seriously—they had three or four magazines,
charts, papers, research. I felt way unprepared. I felt like a
fish out of water. In fact, let me tell you how unprepared I
was. I drafted [baseball player] Edgar Renteria back before
he was a good hitter, when he was still with the Marlins,
because he played good defense! Of course, defense
doesn’t matter at all in fantasy sports, but I didn’t know
anything about fantasy leagues. When I said his name, that
I wanted Edgar Renteria, I heard people snickering, like
‘what is this guy doing?’ I had no clue.

The earliest reference in the interviews to anyone being aware of fantasy sports

was David Young of TalentedMrRoto.com. He remembers his co-workers playing

Rotisserie baseball as early as the 1980s. According to Young:

I first heard of fantasy sports in 1984, when I worked for
Chevron and some of the engineers were playing fantasy
sports. They cut out the box scores and made a spreadsheet
and all that, but I didn’t get involved because that was too
complicated (interview with author, 7 June 2005,
Arlington, Texas).

Though his awareness of fantasy sports dates back more than twenty years,

Young began writing about the topic scarcely eighteen months ago. Brendan Roberts of

32

The Sporting News has a similar story. As a cub reporter in 1991, he joined co-workers

in a baseball points league. Despite a fourteen-year career in journalism, Roberts has

written about fantasy sports for less than six years (interview with author, 1 June 2005,

Arlington, Texas). Charles Polansky and David Sessions, both of the Fort Worth Star-

Telegram, joined fantasy football leagues while in college, years before they had written

their first stories as professionals (Charles Polansky, interview with author, 21 June 2005,

Arlington, Texas; David Sessions, interview with author, 2 June 2005, Arlington, Texas).

Ron Cariker (interview with author, 1 June 2005, Arlington, Texas) of NewsOK.com said

his personal awareness in fantasy football also began in college and is the main reason his

Web site offers fantasy games now. This suggests that fantasy sports was not initially

reliant upon the mass media to become popular, and the mass media were slow to accept

fantasy sports as mainstream. As Barry Horn (interview with author, 27 April 2005,

Arlington, Texas) notes, fantasy players were “a huge market that was untapped for

awhile.”

As has been illustrated, it is one thing to possess an awareness of fantasy sports,

but it is quite another for fantasy sports to become mass media content. There has to be

an interest on the part of the managers making the decisions.

3.1.2 Interest

Interest entails a respondent’s wanting to use fantasy sports as in content he

produced or his manager’s interest in reaching the fantasy audience, meaning there may

be a gap between awareness and interest. Just because media professionals play fantasy

sports does not mean they view it as viable media content. Joe Trahan, the Dallas-based

33

television sports anchor, said everyone in his station’s sports department plays or has

played fantasy sports:

Just about everybody in here, in this department, has played
in a fantasy league in the last two or three years. … We’ve
all played it, and it’s from everyone involved on all sides.
Producers, the guys who are making the decisions, they’re
all playing. It’s just one happy family when it comes to
fantasy. Everybody loves it. Everybody who’s in the
business, everybody who’s covering the business, can
relate (interview with author, 3 June 2005, Dallas).

Respondents generally mentioned interest only after they discussed awareness and

suggested that interest is dependent upon intention. For example, The Sporting News did

not conceive of itself as a destination for fantasy enthusiasts until 2002 when it began

offering regular fantasy-related content, although it was the magazine’s box scores that

Daniel Okrent and his colleagues used to track their statistics and standings (Tygiel

2000). The Sporting News became interested in fantasy after its two principal Internet

rivals, ESPN.com and the CBS-owned SportsLine.com, pioneered fantasy coverage in the

late 1990s (Brendan Roberts, interview with author, 1 June 2005, Arlington, Texas;

Sessions, interview with author, 2 June 2005, Arlington, Texas).

On the whole, mass media managers were slow to become interested in fantasy

sports as a vehicle for attracting new audiences because they felt fantasy sports catered to

a select few. It is clear in the interviews that mass media decision-makers perceived the

fantasy-playing crowd as being segmented or undesirable. Repeatedly, respondents used

derogatory terms to describe the perception of fantasy players. Consider the following

examples that illustrate why mass media decision-makers had little interest in fantasy

34

sports. The Morning News’ Barry Horn (interview with author, 27 April 2005, Arlington,

Texas) said: “They were geeky until they realized everyone was into it—probably even

the people who are making the broadcast decisions.” Mike Hill of ESPN News uses

similar words to describe management’s initial views of the fantasy crowd: “When it

first began, we thought that all the fantasy leagues were just a lot of geeks that got

together and had never played sports in real life” (interview with author, 8 June 2005,

Fort Worth, Texas). Though the mass media’s interest in fantasy sports has shifted, The

Sporting News’ fantasy editor Brendan Roberts (interview with author, 1 June 2005,

Arlington, Texas) said its attitude toward the fantasy constituency has not: “There’s still

a perception that fantasy sports players are all young college kids with lots of time on

their hands. That’s not true. Most fantasy owners are in their mid-30s with jobs, wives,

kids, etc.” That mirrors a larger social trend:

There’s a lot of people who play these sports, but it’s not
100% mainstream. … I liken it to Star Wars fans when
those movies come out. Between the times the movies are
out, you don’t want to look like a geek by talking about it
all the time. But when the movies come out, you can get
out the Darth Vader costume and go stand in line. In the
last few years, it’s become more accepted. You go to
parties now, and people start talking about their fantasy
teams (David Young, interview with author, 7 June 2005,
Arlington, Texas).

A company may not adopt fantasy sports if it perceives no benefit in doing so.

Because FOX and CBS compete against each other during Sunday afternoon NFL games,

each has shown interest in fantasy-related segments, crawlers, and graphics to keep

viewers tuned in. Meanwhile ABC, which offers its Monday Night Football to a captive

35

audience, ignores fantasy sports almost completely (Barry Horn, interview with author,

27 April 2005, Arlington, Texas).

Barry Horn (interview with author, 3 June 2005, Arlington, Texas) said those that

do employ fantasy sports do so as part of their never-ending quest to find an audience.

These networks will do anything to keep people glued to
their TV set to watch their network. … Basically, they’re
constantly looking for hooks to create viewers and keep
them. The networks are fighting for every viewer and
every tenth of a rating point. If they can prove there’s a
market out there, there’s no question that they’ll pander to
it.

If a network, newspaper, or Web site becomes interested in employing fantasy-

related content, it is apt to measure the success and continued demand for that content

based upon market test.

3.1.3 Testing the Market

Testing the market describes how the mass media evaluate their target audience’s

interest in fantasy-related content. If their audience shows interest, they are likely to use

fantasy; if not, they are likely to ignore it. Different media do this in different ways. The

Sporting News regularly conducts audience surveys through its magazine and Web site in

order to evaluate the popularity of all its content. The mantra of The Sporting News

management is attracting younger readers, and the typical fantasy sports player is

younger than 40 (FSTA 2003). The Sporting News also tailors its fantasy content strictly

to players in the most-popular league format, based upon its survey information.

There are so many variations of fantasy that we get more
and more specialized/bizarre leagues everyday. [But] we

36

still target the standard fantasy owner. For instance, we
rarely target the deep-league points owner * because we
realized the most common reader is the standard fantasy
owner (Brendan Roberts, interview with author, 1 June
2005, Arlington, Texas).

While many media companies sponsor fantasy leagues as profit boosters or ask

users to pay for fantasy content, as discussed in Chapter 1, NewsOK.com managing

editor Ron Cariker (interview with author, 1 June 2005, Arlington, Texas) found that

most visitors to the site were interested in playing for recreational purposes, not cash or

prizes. Therefore, access to fantasy games on its site is free. That strategy has proved

effective.

We’re always looking for stuff to enhance and add to our
site. About four years ago, I talked to someone about
fantasy games, but it was cost prohibitive. We didn’t have
people asking that ‘we want the games,’ but once we added
it, we saw there was clamoring for it. Our first year was
men’s NCAA basketball, and people wanted the women’s
game.

Audience feedback also helps media determine when not to use fantasy. WFAA-

TV in Dallas is hesitant to employ fantasy sports, for example, because it determined

fantasy players were not likely to seek content from them.

I’m savvy enough to know that they can get their stats in a
heartbeat. So I feel like they’re taken care of. And if
they’re not they know how to be. What they like is the

*
A points league is a fantasy format where owners compete for points, rather than play against each other
in head-to-head games, as in the standard fantasy league. In a points league, owners are awarded points for
their league ranking in each of several statistical categories. For example, if Team A leads the league in
home runs, Team A’s owner would receive ten or twelve points. If Team B is in the middle of the pack in
stolen bases, Team B’s owner would receive five or six points, and so on. The league champion is the team
with the most points across all statistical categories at the end of the season.

37

analytic stuff that the ESPNs can give them, and the CNNs.
They like that analysis. … But it’s tough on a local level
to specifically target that person (Joe Trahan, interview
with author, 3 June 2005, Dallas).

The Dallas radio station KTCK-AM found a similar environment, based on its

audience surveys.

We used to have a fantasy football show on Sunday nights.
The people that listened wanted to know how their guy is,
and nobody else cares about that dude’s team. In fantasy, it
stops being about the broadcasting of that general thing,
and it got our focus off. It’s taking away for macro team
issues because it’s a beehive of individual people that are
not related. … They don’t need us to get fantasy
information. They’ll get it from their own sources (Jeff
Catlin, interview with author, 20 April 2005, Arlington,
Texas).

Once media managers test their audience, they may choose to adopt fantasy sports

as regular content.

3.1.4 Adoption of Fantasy Sports Content

Mass media who adopt fantasy sports as content do so to keep their edge in the

marketplace, based upon their tests. For example, David Young (interview with author, 7

June 2005, Arlington, Texas) said he believes other sites are now immolating his all-

encompassing TalentedMrRoto.com, which launched in March 2004, in order to keep

pace in the market. The cable network ESPN News will employ any cultural trend in its

information segments to keep viewers away from competitors. “All of a sudden if more

women were watching sports, we’d start to show more WNBA. Right now, fantasy is

38

huge” and thus has become an audience retention tool (Mike Hill, interview with author,

8 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas).

This illustrates a larger trend: A media company is more likely to adopt fantasy

sports if its competitors do so as well. Media focused on the fantasy crowd only when

they began to see it as sufficiently large enough to generate advertising revenue. That is,

revenue they wanted to go to their company and away from their competitors. For

example, editors at The Sporting News turned to fantasy sports after they realized so

many of their readers were involved (Brendan Roberts, interview with author, 1 June

2005, Arlington, Texas). FOX Sports is now not only conscious of the fantasy crowd but

attempts to reach them specifically (David Sessions, interview with author, 2 June 2005,

Arlington, Texas). Joe Trahan (interview with author, 3 June 2005, Dallas) said mass

media decision-makers now understand the fantasy sports population, and therefore

fantasy sports has “a core foothold” in mass media content.

That core foothold is growing so that fantasy sports is more entrenched in the

mass media than ever before. During NFL games on Sunday afternoons, the NFL’s Web

site offers real-time statistics that allow fantasy fans to keep track of their players with

each pass, rush, and kick (Mike Hill, interview with author, 8 June 2005, Fort Worth,

Texas). Brendan Roberts (interview with author, 1 June 2005, Arlington, Texas) figures

his job at The Sporting News would not have even existed if the mass media were not

adopting fantasy sports: “I literally write about fantasy sports, primarily baseball, which

was unheard of years ago. And my columns are read online, rarely in the magazine, and

people are willing to pay money for our content.”

39

Ladd Biro (interview with author, 3 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas) said mass

media’s capitalizing on society’s fascination with fantasy sports was inevitable.

One of the main reasons that fantasy football has become
so important is that players are moving from one team to
another. … [And] people are moving more in this
generation than they used to. So they have a fantasy team
to root for. It makes every game out there matter. If
Atlanta’s playing New Orleans, I wouldn’t normally care
about that, but I’ll watch it. Not because I care who wins,
but I’m wondering how my players are going to do.

In 1998, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram debuted a fantasy football column offering

tips to readers, including such content as a “hot/not pick” and a profile of the writer’s

team (Charles Polansky, interview with author, 21 June 2005, Arlington, Texas). The

Dallas Morning News followed suit in 2001.

I don’t think they [The Morning News managers] made any
outgoing push to say that we have to have a fantasy column
now. I think it was a maintenance thing. I think they said
‘we need to give our readers what they’re looking for.’
They could see the landscape shifting, and they needed to
keep up with it (Ladd Biro, interview with author, 3 June
2005, Fort Worth, Texas).

If the mass media had adopted fantasy previously, it was understated. As a

fantasy baseballer in mid-1990s, David Young (interview with author, 7 June 2005,

Arlington, Texas) remembers looking for help from Sports Illustrated’s Web site. He did

not find much. “It was less conspicuous and less frequent [than now]. Right now they’re

running a column a day, whereas before…it was maybe two or three pieces of

information per week.” In some cases, the fantasy game has supplanted the actual game.

40

Stats used to supplement coverage, to explain things. You
would see that a guy had rushed for 100 yards in five
consecutive games and think, ‘he’s having a good year,’ or
‘that’s a great offensive line,’ or whatever. Now you see
the same stat and think, ‘I should put him on my fantasy
team’ (David Sessions, interview with author, 2 June 2005,
Arlington, Texas).

Just as media consumers think differently, the mass media must adapt to a new

way of thinking as the nature of content shifts. On the whole, mass media are becoming

more instantaneous, more interactive, and more reliant on charts, graphics, and other

forms of quick-hitting, easy-to-digest information. In other words, “eye candy” is as

important as journalistic content (David Sessions, interview with author, 2 June 2005,

Arlington, Texas; Charles Polansky, interview with author, 21 June 2005, Arlington,

Texas). For example, David Sessions notes the new world of sports journalism:

It’s almost like they feel like people wouldn’t watch sports
if they didn’t jazz it up. … In some ways, coverage has
improved because there’s so much information that
broadcasters have access to and can pass on. It’s always
interesting to see a graphic that STATS, Inc. dug up
quickly about the number of blue-eyed third basemen to hit
for the cycle on Tuesdays. That’s relatively new. The
Olympics was the perfect example of using new technology
to enhance viewing—think of the superimposed flags and
names in each lane of the swimming pool. But I also think
much of sports programming has changed into this sort of
dumbed-down, celebrity-based entertainment instead of
responsible journalism (interview with author, 2 June 2005,
Arlington, Texas).

Audiences crave information in real time, making Web-based journalism more

valuable than ever (Ladd Biro, interview with author, 3 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas).

41

Information is accessible at the click of a mouse, which means media consumers have

access to the same information as media providers. Because many may experience

information overload, consumers often search for entertainment in the mass media (Jeff

Catlin, interview with author, 20 April 2005, Arlington, Texas). This is the ideal

environment for fantasy enthusiasts, and makes the media’s adoption of fantasy sports

logical. Once the media adopt fantasy sports, they must then decide how best to use it in

their content.

3.1.5 Use of Fantasy Sports Content

For those companies that adopted fantasy sports as content, respondents described

various ways they use it. While fantasy sports-related content may be obviously labeled

as such, such as by following a “fantasy sports” link on a Web site or reading a magazine

page labeled “fantasy sports,” respondents revealed that it is often more subtle. For

example, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram highlights nightly heroes in each box score

package, and The Dallas Morning News prints statistics, standings, and box scores in

every issue (Charles Polansky, interview with author, 21 June 2005, Arlington, Texas;

Ladd Biro, interview with author, 3 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas). The media may do

preseason specials in each major sport, where their experts prognosticate on who will

have breakout years, win postseason awards, or fight for starting spots. Sports media also

focus increasingly on statistics-oriented reporting, weather broadcasts, and injury news.

While these may appeal to sports fans in general they also help prepare for a fantasy draft

or starting lineup (Ladd Biro, interview with author, 3 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas;

David Sessions, interview with author, 2 June 2005, Arlington, Texas).

42

The respondents viewed fantasy-related content as unique; therefore, a good

sports writer does not necessarily make a good fantasy sports writer. Ladd Biro, a

syndicated columnist, said his career began because he was not satisfied with the

newspaper coverage of fantasy sports.

This all started basically when I sent an e-mail to the sports
editor at The Dallas Morning News a few years ago and
said, basically, ‘your fantasy coverage really stinks.’ Lots
of people really care about this stuff, and that’s how they
watch football now. … They had an internal guy writing a
small column in the year before I started. It wasn’t very
good. He’s a good writer, but fantasy’s not his thing
(interview with author, 3 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas).

Because it requires a certain type of journalist, it follows that larger media

companies with greater assets are more likely to use fantasy sports in their content. That

trend transcended media. Among broadcast/cable networks, national networks were

more likely to have shown an interest in fantasy sports than local networks. ESPN News

reaches seventy million households and is heavy on fantasy content (Mike Hill, interview

with author, 8 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas). By comparison, WFAA-TV in Dallas

reaches two million households and largely ignores fantasy (Joe Trahan, interview with

author, 3 June 2005, Dallas). ESPN, FOX, and CBS, the networks with the largest

sports-viewing audience, use fantasy regularly while smaller sports-broadcasting

networks, such as ABC and NBC, do not (Barry Horn, interview with author, 27 April

2005, Arlington, Texas). In print media, The Sporting News has a circulation of 750,000.

Fantasy has become a staple in its coverage (Brendan Roberts, interview with author, 1

June 2005, Arlington, Texas). The Dallas Morning News is one of the largest

43

newspapers in the United States and “is on the cutting edge to give [fantasy sports]

constant play throughout the season” (Ladd Biro, interview with author, 3 June 2005,

Fort Worth, Texas). With regard to online media, NewsOK.com attracts twenty million

visitors a month and offers a page dedicated entirely to fantasy and pick-‘em-style games

(Ron Cariker, interview with author, 1 June 2005, Arlington, Texas). Both Sports

Illustrated and The Sporting News, national publications with prominent Web sites,

employ fantasy content online (David Young, interview with author, 7 June 2005,

Arlington, Texas; Brendan Roberts, interview with author, 1 June 2005, Arlington,

Texas).

Since each medium presents content differently (i.e., print, visual broadcast, audio

broadcast, hybrid, etc.), how each medium uses fantasy sports varies as well. In the case

of print media, fantasy content typically appears in two ways: in a regularly appearing

space or in a one-time special section at the beginning of each professional sport’s

season. Each edition of The Sporting News, for example, contains a fantasy page

designed to inform and entertain a younger, more “laidback” audience (Brendan Roberts,

interview with author, 1 June 2005, Arlington, Texas). Both the Fort Worth Star-

Telegram and The Dallas Morning News run regular fantasy football columns that offer

readers insight on assembling and managing a fantasy team.

I think it’s important to have some longevity in doing this
because you can see how players progress throughout the
year. They follow patterns. That background and
experience really comes in to play. You have to be able to
separate fantasy from real life, such as Michael Vick. He’s
a great quarterback in real life, but he’s a terrible fantasy
quarterback. I don’t know that a guy who’s been playing
for 10 years will learn anything from my column, but my

44

opinion will come into play. These people like to get
different opinions before they make decisions. But it’s a
very inexact science (Ladd Biro, interview with author, 3
June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas).

While Ladd Biro’s work for The Dallas Morning News means he is responsible

for a column each Monday, he notes that other newspapers are not so dedicated to

fantasy. Biro believes that print media ignore fantasy at their own peril. “Some papers

are behind the curve, and they say it’s not something they’re focused on. Frankly, that’s

just stupid” (Ladd Biro, interview with author, 3 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas).

Fantasy use is more varied among cable, broadcast, and radio networks. Fantasy

is absent from most radio lineups because it does not translate well in an audio-only

medium. Jeff Catlin, program director for KTCK, said:

Radio is different than any other medium. Radio is a
broadcast medium. It is mass communications. We are
trying to reach as many people as we can. Fantasy sports is
generally big on the whole, but most fantasy players are in
a league with five, ten, twenty people that they know. It’s
different for that guy and his five or ten buddies than for
anyone else in any other league. When you start trying to
do broadcast to what is a massive group of niche people, it
just doesn’t work. … It’s a beehive of individual people
that are not related. The difference is that on an Internet
site, it doesn’t matter if they have a million hits if they’re
all at once or over a period of time, you still have a million
hits. With TV you have your main box and a stat crawler,
and you can treat it as different mediums [sic]. Even in
newspaper it works to some extent. But radio can’t be for
the individual. It has to be for the masses. It just doesn’t
work (interview with author, 20 April 2005, Fort Worth,
Texas).

45

For much the same reason, local television stations often do not use fantasy

sports. In order to keep ratings high, local programmers must attract the casual sports fan

who may be curious about the outcome of a game but cares little about statistical

information (Joe Trahan, interview with author, 3 June 2005, Dallas). Cable networks, to

which a sports fan must subscribe, can be, and are, much heavier users of fantasy sports.

ESPN News, for example, airs regular fantasy-related segments such as “Experts

Corner,” the sole function of which is dispensing fantasy advice. And “one of the

reasons that ESPN News even runs the score panel after the highlights is for fantasy

players, so they can see how people from their team did that night” (Mike Hill, interview

with author, 8 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas).

Fantasy sports is widely used prevalent in Internet media, where editors can

combine written text (as in newspaper) with video (as in television), but face no time or

space restrictions. TalentedMrRoto.com, a Web site devoted entirely to fantasy sports

content, offers twenty-four different columns per week, each of which receives about 600

hits and ranges in interest from arena football to Major League baseball (David Young,

interview with author, 7 June 2005, Arlington, Texas). NewsOK.com provides news

from the Oklahoma City area but uses fantasy games as a way to keep visitors on the site

longer (Ron Cariker, interview with author, 1 June 2005, Arlington, Texas). The

Sporting News’ Web site not only operates its own fantasy leagues but also runs several

fantasy columns (Brendan Roberts, interview with author, 1 June 2005, Arlington,

Texas).

Regardless of the format, however, media do not employ fantasy-related material

unless it fits logically with their overall content strategies. Therefore, fantasy sports has

46

minimum impact on mass media content. For example, one of the primary reasons to

visit NewsOK.com is for the latest information on University of Oklahoma and Big XII

Conference athletics. Therefore, the site’s fantasy content does not supersede that, but

rather enhances it by offering collegiate fantasy games. Ron Cariker explains the

strategy:

I don’t really think we have people who come to us just to
play those games; I think they’re a great complement to
what we have people come here for. People come to look
at OU football, but we make it very apparent that we have
these games and other stuff. We hook them (interview with
author, 1 June 2005, Arlington, Texas).

Editors at The Dallas Morning News and the Fort Worth Star-Telegram concern

themselves first with covering the local and national sporting scene so fantasy is a

secondary supplement (Ladd Biro, interview with author, 3 June 2005, Fort Worth,

Texas; Charles Polansky, interview with author, 21 June 2005, Arlington, Texas). Even

at ESPN, fantasy sports has only increased the network’s content, not altered or refocused

it. As Mike Hill noted:

I haven’t seen much of a change in the content—just more
content. I see it more for baseball. In fact there’s a new
show on Saturdays on ESPN News that has polls and is
more interactive. If you look at the tickers, they’re all for
fantasy players now—who’s doing what, even if the game
is still in progress. I just see more and more scoreboards
and more and more tickers in just about every show
(interview with author, 8 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas).

While fantasy sports has done little to change mass media, it is increasingly

shifting out of the broader scope toward one medium in particular: the World Wide Web.

47

Though various media employ fantasy sports with some degree of success, each

respondent—regardless of what medium he works in—stated that fantasy sports works

best online because of the immediate availability of information. In Mike Hill’s words:

“You just hit the refresh button every fifteen seconds and you’re ready to go” (interview

with author, 8 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas). Charles Polansky and Ladd Biro, in

writing fantasy columns for their respective newspapers, typically troll Internet sites,

rather than newspapers, for column fodder because of the instant availability of statistics

(Charles Polansky, interview with author, 21 June 2005, Arlington, Texas; Ladd Biro,

interview with author, 3 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas). Given that most hobbyists

already play fantasy sports online, they are familiar with the Web and using it for their

fantasy sports needs. Barry Horn describes the Internet’s appeal:

You used to have to wait until you got the paper and wait to
see how your guy did. Then ESPN came along and you
could pretty much tell how your guys were doing. Now
comes the Internet, and you could pretty much watch your
player carry-by-carry or pass-by-pass (interview with
author, 27 April 2005, Arlington, Texas).

Television sports anchor Joe Trahan said:

If I had [New Orleans’] Deuce McAllister as one my
running backs, I knew that there were five or six sites I
could go to before his game was even over. I could go
online while I was covering the Saints and check out some
of my other guys at halftime and see what they were doing.
There was so much content there. … It’s made it easy for
the fantasy fan to follow what they do (interview with
author, 3 June 2005, Dallas).

48

The fantasy enthusiast is not the only one enjoying such benefits. The mass

media industry has seen tangible benefits of employ fantasy-related content.

3.1.6 Benefits of Fantasy Sports Content

When respondents discussed the benefits of using fantasy sports-related content,

they spoke in terms of increased audience size, larger profits, or longer retention time.

For example, when The Sporting News launched a Web site dedicated solely to fantasy

content in 2002, the company noted more people logging on for fantasy games, news, and

information than ever before (Brendan Roberts, interview with author, 1 June 2005,

Arlington, Texas). Web editor David Young (interview with author, 7 June 2005,

Arlington, Texas) said fantasy sports is “definitely a way to increase hit counts.”

Whether increased hit counts can be linked specifically to fantasy sports content,

however, is tough to measure. Ron Cariker (interview with author, 1 June 2005,

Arlington, Texas) said visitors to his NewsOK.com probably do not log on specifically to

play fantasy games. But the fantasy games do serve a specific purpose. As Cariker

notes,

It increases traffic. It keeps people on our site longer. It
adds to things we already have. We can’t give people
enough stuff. Everything we’ve done increases our traffic,
but people don’t come to us just to play these games
(interview with author, 1 June 2005, Arlington, Texas).

Similar results are apparent in other interviews with media professionals. Fantasy

sports has boosted television numbers because fifteen million viewers (FSTA 2003)

watch games they would not care about if not for monitoring their fantasy team. “Every

game has some sort of impact on your fantasy league. It creates a fervent fan base for

49

certain sports. You have to watch all the games” (David Sessions, interview with author,

2 June 2005, Arlington, Texas). Ladd Biro (interview with author, 3 June 2005, Fort

Worth, Texas) estimates that as many as three-quarters of subscribers to DirecTV’s

Sunday Ticket Package on satellite, which shows every NFL game every week, are

fantasy football enthusiasts. “The more you can do for fantasy players, the more

viewership you’re going to get. Period. And the more viewers you have, the more you

can charge for advertising. Basically it’s dollar and cents” (Mike Hill, interview with

author, 8 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas). Besides that, media companies such as The

Sporting News ask Web visitors to pay a subscription fee to play fantasy games and view

some fantasy content (Brendan Roberts, interview with author, 1 June 2005, Arlington,

Texas). Fantasy sports can have a different kind of financial impact, too. Joe Trahan

from television station WFAA said:

They’ve got a lot of that stuff sponsored, so it’s also made
new revenue streams for them by catering to that fantasy
fan. And when you talk about revenue streams, they’re
going to jump all over that, we know that! (interview with
author, 3 June 2005, Dallas).

As long as the mass media continue to benefit from fantasy sports-related content,

it stands to reason that such content will continue. The interview subjects speculated on

what the future might hold for fantasy-related media content.

3.1.7 Future of Fantasy Sports

Given the benefits of fantasy sports on the Web already mentioned, some media

companies have already begun moving their fantasy-related content to their Web sites.

For example, while Dallas television station WFAA-TV does not use fantasy sports in its

50

sports broadcasts, network executives do attempt to get fantasy-related hits from their

Web site. As soon as a game ends, for example, box scores and statistics go up on

wfaa.com. As Joe Trahan states:

That’s where WFAA.com really comes in to play, and they
do a good job of it. Like I said, as soon as the game’s over
you can get the box score pretty much instantaneously. It
will be on our Web site, and you’ve got what you want,
you’ve got what you need. I think that’s how we’re doing
it, because I think we give the fantasy fan credit that they
will know how to get what they need. If we can push them
to the Web and get some page hits from it, that’s good for
us (interview with author, 3 June 2005, Dallas).

David Sessions (interview with author, 2 June 2005, Arlington, Texas) said that

national networks are also pushing fantasy audiences to their Web sites. The Internet

could potentially replace television, too, with its streaming video capabilities (David

Young, interview with author, 7 June 2005, Arlington, Texas). Given that viewers want

in-depth information immediately, broadcast is quickly fading as a viable medium (David

Sessions, interview with author, 2 June 2005, Arlington, Texas). Charles Polansky

(interview with author, 21 June 2005, Arlington, Texas) believes that the Internet is

already replacing newspapers’ fantasy content because news can be delivered so much

more quickly. Polansky gives the example of a recent injury to Chicago Cubs pitcher and

fantasy star Mark Prior:

The Internet Web sites had it immediately. I would’ve had
to wait several days, perhaps almost a full week to write
about that in my column if I wanted to do that. … The
immediacy of the Internet kills fantasy sports in
newspapers. I’m not sure there’s much more viable

51

information in newspapers (interview with author, 21 June
2005, Arlington, Texas).

Based on recent trends, The Dallas Morning News plans to increase its fantasy

content for the 2005 NFL season by increasing its online offerings (Ladd Biro, interview

by author, 3 June 2005, Fort Worth, Texas).

Whether fantasy-related content shifts entirely to the Internet or remains diffused

across media, it is apt to become even more interactive. DirecTV will debut its Red Zone

channel for the 2005 NFL season. Rather than showing an entire NFL game, Red Zone

will switch from game to game as teams get close to scoring. The idea is that fantasy

users can see if their players are having big games (David Sessions, interview by author,

2 June 2005, Arlington, Texas). Sessions also believes that watching NFL highlights

may become more personalized, i.e., that fantasy fans can input their fantasy roster and

watch only those highlights involving their players. The games themselves may become

more personal, too. For example, new market software already allows fantasy providers

to cater games for local regions, such as for high school or college teams (Ron Cariker,

interview by author, 1 June 2005, Arlington, Texas).

These results reveal much about the evolution of fantasy sports in the mass media,

including how media professionals became aware of it, corporate interest in it, how

different markets tested it, adopted it, used it, benefited from it, and how these

respondents projected its future. Chapter 4 summarizes the work and discusses its

implications in light of extant theory. The limitations of this research are discussed, and

suggestions are offered for future research.

52

CHAPTER 4

DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrates how fantasy sports has evolved in the mass

media, placing for the first time this empirical phenomenon of culture in an academic

context. However, as with any study, limitations are present, and currently available data

cannot answer some questions. This chapter addresses these, ending with an observation

about the fantasy sports’ place in the mass media.

4.1 Review of Results

In order to entertain themselves, a group of sportswriters in 1979 quietly created

Rotisserie baseball, the forerunner to a $1.5 billion industry that now entertains more than

fifteen million Americans (Tygiel 2000; FSTA 2003; Ipsos 2003). Fantasy games are

typically played via the Internet and allow fans to join leagues, draft players from real-

life professional sports teams, and score points based upon those athletes’ performances

in actual games. Cash and prizes are often at stake (FSTA, 2003).

The principal goal of this research was to examine how the “cultural obsession”

(Ballard 2004 p. 1) of fantasy sports has evolved in the mass media. In general, the

results revealed how fantasy sports-related content serves as a method mass media

employ to attract and retain consumers. In-depth interviews with professionals from

various sectors of the industry illustrated how fantasy sports becomes viable media

content according to seven themes: awareness, interest, testing, adoption, use, benefits,

and future projections.

53

Each step is related and crucial to the process. For example, just because a

member of the media plays fantasy sports, that does mean not he or she believes it

translates well into professional content. Even if managers are interested in using fantasy

sports, testing may prove it unwise for a particular medium or a particular market.

Realized benefits may enhance use or alter future projections.

The results showed that fantasy sports impacts audience size for mass media

entities. Most respondents were aware of fantasy sports long before they incorporated it

into their content, but mass media decision-makers were hesitant to accept fantasy sports

as suitable content. Competition affects the spread of fantasy sports among mass media

corporations, and those with larger audiences are more likely to adopt it. As with all

content, the success of fantasy sports is based upon audience feedback. It is evident that

fantasy sports is more prevalent in the mass media now than ever before, and its adoption

follows a larger trend toward more instantaneous, interactive media content.

Additionally, different media use fantasy sports in different ways and always in

accordance with their content strategies. Though fantasy sports is seen in all forms of

mass media, respondents agreed that fantasy sports is best suited for the Web. Therefore,

the Web is seen to be the medium of the future for fantasy-related content.

Based on these results, it is possible to understand how fantasy sports has evolved

in the mass media. Within the coded interview transcripts, the final categories bear a

similarity to diffusion of innovations. Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory offers a

logical theoretical lens through which to view the results.

54

4.2 Theoretical Connection

Diffusion of Innovations describes how a social system adopts change over time

through communication channels; in this case, how fantasy sports may or may not

become incorporated into mass media content. Diffusion of Innovations is a useful

theory in the present study given its ability to describe the adoption of change. In 1903,

French sociologist Gabriel Tarde developed an S-shaped curve that shows an

innovation’s permeation over time. However, it was another 40 years before sociologists

Ryan and Gross published a landmark study focusing on a new hybrid corn seed being

adopted by Iowa farmers. Everett Rogers’ explanation of the theory first appeared in

1960 and since then has been used in more than 5,200 studies (Rogers 1995).

Rogers (1995) theorized that a new idea, an innovation, becomes socially

mainstream, or diffused, according to a five-step process: (1) potential adopters become

aware of the innovation; (2) potential adopters form a favorable or unfavorable opinion of

the innovation; (3) potential adopters adopt or reject the innovation; (4) adopters put the

innovation to use; and (5) adopters evaluate the decision they made to adopt the

innovation (p. 162). Accordingly, diffusion requires communication through a social

system. Rogers stated that 2.5% of a social system, the so-called innovators or opinion

leaders, will adopt the innovation first. Next, 13.5% of the population forms the early

adopters, 34% comprise the early majority, 34% are the late majority, and the final 16%

are labeled laggards (p. 262).

Time is another important and unique element in Rogers’ theory. He argued that

innovations are diffused over time along an S-shaped curve (p. 258), so that adoption

begins slowly, takes off quickly, and then slowly levels off. However, if members of a

55

social system interact particularly closely with one another, diffusion may spread more

quickly regardless of time (Young 2002).

4.2.1 Landmark Studies in Diffusion of Innovation

Diffusion of Innovations is adaptable to almost any idea, and although not all of

the studies have focused on mass communications, they have aided in the development of

the theory. The initial influential study was Ryan and Gross’ (1943) examination of the

adoption of the hybrid corn seed and concluded that the influence of the innovators to

their more-cautious peers facilitated the likelihood of widespread diffusion. The

diffusion paradigm spread through sociologists in the 1950s and 1960s, and then to a

larger, interdisciplinary field by the late 1960s. Since Ryan and Gross, diffusion has

become common in research of sociology, communication, and other social sciences

(Valente & Rogers 1995).

Hagerstrand (1967), in researching tuberculosis testing in Swedish cattle,

concluded that the closer-knit a social system is, the quicker a diffusion likely will

spread. Similarly, Coleman, Katz, and Menzel (1966) stated that influence and respect

are important factors in Diffusion of Innovations. They found that experimental drugs

were more likely to be diffused into a social system of doctors when a well-respected

physician first prescribed it. Likewise, Collier and Messick (1975) stated that smaller

nations tend to follow the lead of leading countries on issues such as social spending.

O’Loughlin, et al. (1998), used Diffusion of Innovations to explain the 1940s-1990s

spread of democracy among former communist nations. They stated that, over time,

“discrete changes in regimes” served as the innovators and early adopters (p. 545).

56

4.2.2 Studies Related to Communication

Katz and Lazarsfeld (1955) fashioned diffusions as a media theory in their

influential book Personal Influence. They stated that the mass media impact the diffusion

of an innovation given their influence on the social system and theorized that the mass

media will impact one’s knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding an innovation.

Following the notion outlined in that study, Oberschall (1994) hypothesized that mass

media coverage of sit-in demonstrations during the Eastern European democracy

movement facilitated the diffusion of similar protests. Grubb (1999) authored a case

study examining radio broadcasts in Estonia after the fall of Communism. He stated that

such broadcasts helped democratize the nation following the Velvet Revolution by

broadcasting with cultural interests in mind, paying particular attention to political and

economy rebuilding.

Many recent Diffusion studies in communication describe the diffusion of a

technological innovation through a social system. Fichman and Kemerer (1999) found

that adoption and knowledge barriers mean some innovations, including communication

technologies, are never adopted. Carley (1999) stated that the spread of communication

technologies creates in some cultures an artificial agent that changes the social system to

allow faster spread of messages and greater inherent complexity in the messages. In his

book The Victorian Internet, Standage (1998) argued that new communication

technologies “shrink the world faster and further than ever before…revolutionize

business practice, gives rise to new forms of crime, and inundate users with a deluge of

information. The benefits are relentlessly hyped by advocates and dismissed by skeptics”

(p. 1).

57

O’Hagan (2001) explained the increasing popularity of digital television through

Diffusion of Innovations by stating that the technology “is but the beginning of a process

of integration…that heralds new dimensions to entertainment and e-commerce” (p. 475).

Schultz (2002) stated that outside factors, such as religion and age, may also play a role

in such adoption. He observed a difference in digital implementation between religious

and secular broadcast and cable networks. Survey results showed a positive correlation

between the network executives’ religious background and age and their acceptance or

resistance of digital broadcast technologies.

Vagliasindi and Vagliasindi (2003) concluded that the diffusion of the Internet in

Third World countries, as in more stable economic climates, is aided by innovative

corporations that are ahead of the curve in adopting new technologies rather than the

government or foreign influence.

In the present study, the innovation in question is fantasy sports as mass media

content, and diffusion is the adoption of such content among the media entities. The

mass media serve as the social system. Testing the market, a theme described in the

previous chapter, enables the media to evaluate their decision to adopt or reject the

innovation of fantasy sports. Among those media that decide to adopt fantasy sports, the

innovators include the Web sites ESPN.com and Sportsline.com, among the first to

feature fantasy-related content in 1997 or 1998. Those media that followed quickly, such

as The Sporting News, are early adopters. Those that followed later, such as

NewsOK.com, are early majority. Other media are considered late majority and laggards.

Those who do not employ fantasy-related content, according to Rogers, have decided to

reject the innovation.

58

While diffusion of innovations frames this research in a theoretical relevance, the

present study, like any study, is not free from limitations.

4.3 Limitations

One limitation was the geographic centrality of the respondents. While some of

the respondents work and live in Phoenix, New York, Oklahoma City, or other places,

many live in or around Dallas. While this may have been inconsequential, it is possible

that the Dallas media environment is different than other parts of the nation. For those

respondents not available locally, or who had scheduling problems, telephone interviews

were necessary. Telephone interviews may restrict the personal rapport between

interviewer and subject, which may make the subject less likely to open up (Berg 2004).

Some helpful potential subjects were not available or could not be scheduled. For

example, communications sent to network executives at major broadcast and cable

networks went ignored, unreturned, or refused participation. Interviews with upper-level

decision-makers at large media corporations would have enhanced the study.

Additionally, all respondents were male. This is not surprising given the Fantasy

Sports Trade Association’s statistic that 93% of fantasy hobbyists are male (FSTA 2003)

but it is possible that female members of the media few fantasy sports differently and

thus were less likely to have an awareness or interest in it or to use it as journalism

content.

Another limitation is the relative lack of existing literature regarding fantasy

sports, which is only a recent topic for scholars. The absence of exploratory studies or

comprehensive academic works made it difficult to know where to begin, and offered no

set of comparative results.

59

4.4 Suggestions for Future Research

Given the relative newness of fantasy sports, scholars have the opportunity for

continued research in this emerging field. The present research could serve as

background for future studies. For example, one could apply the same topic to a

consumer environment, specifically examining how consumers use the mass media to

satisfy their fantasy sports needs. In such a study, an audience-focused theory, such as

Uses and Gratifications, would be necessary. However, the research model and theory

applied here could show how the mainstream mass media adopt cultural phenomenon

other than fantasy sports.

The present principles could examine in further detail a trend presented here,

namely that media content is likely to become more interactive. Another future study

could take the results presented here and narrow the focus to explore how fantasy sports

has evolved in a single medium, such as broadcast or Internet, or examine why fantasy

sports seems to have become diffused while other cultural phenomenon have not.

Additionally, this study might be replicable using quantitative methods, such as

ratings numbers for fantasy-related programming, advertising income generated from

fantasy-related content, or surveys of media professionals using Likert scales or other

quantifiers, in order to determine how fantasy sports impacts audience and revenue

numbers.

4.5 Conclusion

In Chapter 3, the interview subjects spoke about what they believe the future of

fantasy-related content will be. Answers varied, but the consensus was that it will be

more interactive and customized. The day may come where fantasy players can input

60

their rosters directly into an Internet site or television feed and watch nightly highlights

only of those players, rather than sitting through a half-hour broadcast in hopes of hearing

some references (David Sessions, interview with author, 2 June 2005, Arlington, Texas).

Sessions stated that fantasy content is already going overboard, but Barry Horn

(interview with author, 27 April 2005, Arlington Texas) conceives of live game

broadcasts be reduced entirely to stat crawlers and fantasy references. Maybe fantasy

will become integrated into young sports fans’ other obsession: video games (Joe Trahan,

interview with author, 3 June 2005, Dallas).

Without new innovations, it is unlikely that many more media will adopt fantasy

sports. Those who can best employ it already use it regularly, and those who cannot have

stated so. Additionally, there is the question of how many more hobbyists fantasy sports

can attract, given the sheer number of participants already engaged. Do many fervent

NFL fans, for example, not already play fantasy football? This should not suggest that

either fantasy sports or fantasy-related content are on the decline; indeed, the FSTA

(2003) still show slight increases in participation levels. As long as fantasy sports

sustains its present levels of popularity in society, mass media managers have no reason

to scale back, or discontinue altogether, its use in their content.

61

APPENDIX A

DESCRIPTION OF INTERVIEW PROTOCOL

62

Interview subjects were selected based upon several criteria. Each subject was

selected because he:

• is a mass-media professional;

• is familiar with the concept of fantasy sports;

• was accessible;

• agreed to be interviewed;

• and agreed to have his name and company used in the study, in order to

show why he is an expert.

Subjects were found through references, through their highly visible content, or

through the researchers’ knowledge of the subjects. The research neither knew nor had a

previous relationship with most of the respondents.

As stated in Chapter 3, the interviews followed the format of a semi-standardized

interview, as defined in Berg (2004): They were more or less structured, questions could

be reordered as needed, wordings of questions were flexible, the level of language could

be adjusted as needed, and the interviewer could answer questions and make

clarifications as needed. Generally, the same list of questions was used in each interview,

although the order varied occasionally. Some interviews included unique follow-up

questions, based upon a particular unique response, and, if necessary, questions were

reworded to reflect a subject’s particular medium or situation. Sample interview

questions are included in Appendix B.

Interviews were recorded either on cassette tape or digitally and transcribed for

easy access. Some were conducted personally; others via telephone. Interviews lasted

between 30 and 60 minutes each, and material for the questions was based on, and

63

complemented by, secondary material to include academic and popular sources; these

sources are included in review of literature in Chapter 1. The variety and depth of

interviews allowed the researcher to achieve saturation, as defined by Baxter and Babbie

(2004) as the point where additional interviews yield no new information. That is to say,

information gleaned from the later interviews began to duplicate those conducted earlier.

64

APPENDIX B

SAMPLE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS

65

Some or all of the following questions were asked to some or all of the

respondents. Questions may have been reworded slightly, depending upon the subjects’

medium or particular situation. Follow-up questions unique to a given interview are not

included in this list.

Sample questions

Name and job title…

How long have you worked in the media industry?

How long have you been in your current position?

What is the circulation of your newspaper?/How many households does your network
reach?/How many hits does your Web site receive each day?

What role do you play in selecting content?

Through what process do you (or your editors) decide on content?

How does what’s on other newspapers/Web sites/networks publish/air impact your
content decisions?

Do other kinds of media—such as Internet—affect your content decisions?

In what ways has content changed since you’ve been in the mass media business?

In what ways has what your viewers/subscribers expect changed since you’ve been in
your current position?

How does viewer/subscriber interest drive your content decisions?

How does advertiser interest drive your content decisions?

What are some examples of viewer-/subscriber-driven content in your
newspaper/network/Web site?

What are some examples of advertiser-driven content in your newspaper/network/Web
site?

How do you know what viewers/subscribers want to see?

66

How do you know what advertisers want to see?

Obviously, the media have many functions. What do you see as the media’s most
important function?

What trends have you noticed regarding fantasy sports in the mass media?

Overall, do you see more fantasy sports in the mass media now than ever before?

What do you think prompted these changes?

What is the benefit of these changes?

For what medium do you think fantasy sports is best suited?

Does your station/newspaper/Web site try to attract the fantasy sports hobbyists in
particular?

In what ways do you use fantasy sports in your content?

When did you first become aware there was such a thing as fantasy sports?

When did fantasy sports first appear in your content?

Why did your newspaper/network/Web site begin using fantasy sports?

How would you gauge the impact of fantasy sports on your content?

In your opinion, how saturated is fantasy sports in the mass media? In its infancy stages,
at the end of the road, or somewhere in between?

67

APPENDIX C

INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS

68

Ladd Biro, Freelance Columnist, June 3, 2005

Q: What is your specific job title?

A: I’m a syndicated columnist. I write freelance columns, and several papers run them

every week: The Dallas Morning News, the Cleveland Plain Dealer, Pittsburgh Post

Gazette, The Sporting News. Hopefully I’ll have more this year.

Q: Do you just write about fantasy football?

A: I just do fantasy football, because this is just for fun. I run a marketing agency based

out of Flower Mound. It’s just for fun, just an excuse I give my wife to watch all the

games.

Q: Did you ever work in the media business before doing these fantasy columns?

A: No, but I’ve always been a good writer. My friends have always told me that I should

write a book. I knew I had that skill.

Q: How long have you been doing these columns?

A: This will be my third year this fall. This all started basically when I sent an e-mail to

the sports editor at The Dallas Morning News a few years ago and said, basically, “your

fantasy coverage really stinks.” Lots of people really care about this stuff, and that’s how

they watch football now. Well, I kind of forgot about it. Then he called me back and

said he liked my ideas and asked me to submit some columns.

69

Q: Do you have complete control over what’s in your column, or is a topic assigned to

you?

A: I have control over it. Well, we have an agreed approach. My format is that I talk

about who would be good free-agent acquisitions or who you should trade for. That’s

about it. It’s basically the same topic in all my columns, expect in Cleveland I run on

Saturdays, so I adapt what I write on Mondays for The Morning News. [In Cleveland]

they want me to recommend starters and sitters for people’s teams.

Q: Why did you start doing this?

A: I’ve played for six or seven years and always do well in my league, or leagues. I

follow all the news. I think it’s important to have some longevity in doing this because

you can see how players progress throughout the year. They follow patterns. That

background and experience really comes in to play. You have to be able to separate

fantasy from real life, such as Michael Vick. He’s a great quarterback in real life, but he’s

a terrible fantasy quarterback. I don’t know that a guy who’s been playing for 10 years

will learn anything from my column, but my opinion will come into play. These people

like to get different opinions before they make decisions. But it’s a very inexact science.

Q: How does what’s in other newspapers affect your column content?

A: I don’t read their columnists, per se. I do get some e-mails from sites that I’m signed

up for. I’m not looking to see what they’re having to say, but I’ll look at who people are

recommending. And honestly, I have to write my column on Sunday night, so there’s

70

nothing out there yet. Other than checking the wires to see if somebody got hurt, I don’t

have anything to look at.

Q: Do other kinds of media affect your content decisions?

A: I go to the NFL Web site and go through the stats on the Web site. I’m watching all

the games, but I don’t know all the stats. I might know that Donald Driver had a good

game, but I won’t know his exact stats. So I’ll go look.

Q: In what ways has sports page content changed since you’ve been in the media

business?

A: Web sites are the biggest change. That’s the biggest difference because of the

abundance of information available in real time. The daily paper really isn’t what people

want these days, so it’s made the Web site more important. I’ll rarely go to a newspaper

to get statistics or an opinion. I’ll go to the Web because it’s so much easier. From a

fantasy perspective, lots of newspapers have begun giving more space to fantasy sports.

Some do it infrequently, such as a special section at the beginning of the season. But I

think The Morning News is on the cutting edge to give it constant play throughout the

season. Some papers are behind the curve. I’ve contacted another 30 or 40 papers, and

they say it’s not something they’re focused on. Frankly, that’s just stupid.

Q: What trends have you noticed regarding fantasy sports in the mass media overall?

A: Absolutely, there’s more and more every year. The ultimate is FOX or CBS, who have

started running stats all the time. Constantly. There are people who are starting to think

71

that they’ve gone a little bit overboard. Even for somebody like me, who watches the

games entirely focused on fantasy football, it becomes overload. When they’re showing

a graphic that said someone’s rushed three times for 15 yards, nobody cares about that.

Q: What about when you hear the announcers make fantasy references during the

broadcast, such as someone catching a touchdown pass and he said “Oh, that’s great!

That guy’s on my fantasy team!” Do you think that’s appropriate?

A: The anchors and the play-by-play guys are factoring it into their discussions because

they play, too. When their guys are doing well, you hear about it. I’ve heard Boomer

Esiason say that. It doesn’t bother me. It kind of humanizes those announcers more. It

kind of puts them on a fan level.

Q: What do you think prompted these changes?

A: One of the main reasons that fantasy football has become so important is that players

are moving from one team to another. I think people are not as loyal to their hometown

team as they once were. People are moving more in this generation than they used to. I

used to live in Miami, and I’m a big Dolphins fan. I don’t play, I don’t go to games, so I

have to watch them from afar. So I have a fantasy team to root for. It’s just a fun way to

watch the game. It makes every game out there matter. If Atlanta’s playing New

Orleans, I wouldn’t normally care about that, but I’ll watch it. Not because I care who

wins, but I’m wondering how my players are going to do. I don’t know too many people

who get out of fantasy football once they’re in it because it adapts the way they watch the

game.

72

Q: What is the benefit of these changes?

A: I don’t know that it translates into advertising dollars in something like The Dallas

Morning News because it’s still a minor part of what they do. I think it helps maintain

circulation among sports readers when there are stats in the paper the next day. That’s

almost as important as the column. Fantasy content is so ubiquitous that you can find it

anywhere. I think fantasy football has been a huge boost and boon for television.

There’s 15 or 20 million other people who now have an interest in more than one game—

probably all the games. They can use that to boost their advertising dollars because they

can show increased viewership. But the big benefactor has been DirecTV for the Sunday

Ticket package. Fifty to 75% of the people who subscribe to that are fantasy football

players. I used to get Sunday Ticket to watch the Dolphins no matter where I lived. But

that’s not so much why I get it now.

Q: For what medium do you think fantasy sports is best suited?

A: The Internet is definitely number one. Not that it’s always the best content-wise,

because it’s quick. The best-written articles are in print. Television is so fleeting, and

none of the shows are terribly interesting. I don’t even watch them. There’s something

about talking heads that isn’t very interesting. But some people do watch them. I was on

TXCN on Fridays talking fantasy, and people would call in and ask me questions about

who I should start or who I should sit. So I know there’s interest.

73

Q: How does The DMN try to attract the fantasy sports hobbyists in particular?

A: I don’t think they made any outgoing push to say that we have to have a fantasy

column. I think it was a maintenance thing. I think they said “we need to give our

readers what they’re looking for.” They can see the landscape shifting, and they need to

keep up with it. They’re expanding their coverage quite a bit this fall. I’m not at liberty

to talk about it, but I’ll be doing another column, plus there’ll be new stuff online to be

ahead of the curve. It’s continuing to give them what they want.

Q: When did fantasy sports first appear in The DMN?

A: I think they had an internal guy writing a small column in the year before I started. It

wasn’t very good. He’s a good writer, but fantasy’s not his thing.

Q: In your opinion, how saturated is fantasy sports in the mass media? In its infancy

stages, at the end of the road, or somewhere in between?

A: It’s definitely somewhere in between. It’s well beyond the infancy stage, but it’s hard

to say how much bigger it’s going to get. There’s a limit as to how many people are

going to get into fantasy football. There’s only so many people who are real rabid

football fans, and only so many people who have time to do this. I don’t know that we’re

at the saturation point yet, but I don’t think it’s far off. There needs to be some kind of

innovation to keep it going or it will plateau out.

74

Ron Cariker, Managing Editor of www.NewsOK.com, June 1, 2005

Q: What’s you job title?

A: I’m the managing editor for NewsOK.com

Q: What does that mean you do?

A: I have the responsibility to oversee all projects and all aspects of the site. I’m like the

Webmaster who facilitates all the projects that go on, finding vendors, and things like

that. I work quite a bit internally with the newspaper and the TV station as well. It all

finds its way to me.

Q: How long have you worked in the media industry?

A: Six years, but I have no background in journalism other than school.

Q: How long have you been in your current position?

A: Three years.

Q: How many hits does NewsOK.com receive each day?

A: I’ll give you some numbers and let you do the math. Our monthly averages are about

20 million hits a month. Traffic has climbed and climbed and climbed to where 20

million is fairly common.

Q: What role do you play in selecting content for the Web site?

75

A: We have another editor who selects content, who does nothing but post content and

breaking news. They put up content daily from the newspaper. There’s one person who

manages all that. Everything that’s in the newspaper would be on the Web site, but

what’s online may not make it into the paper because of space. Plus there will be wire

service stories and things like that.

Q: Whose idea were these fantasy games?

A: The fantasy sports thing is me. Personally, I was playing fantasy football online in

college, and it’s an interest I had way back when. We have a vendor who started to

migrate into some of these systems, and they asked me questions of what I think would

be cool. I asked them about fantasy games and picks games. The first thing we did was a

college basketball pick-’em game.

Q: Has it helped your hit count?

A: Yeah, I think it helps. I don’t really think we have people who come to us just to play

those games; I think they’re a great complement to what we have people come here for.

People come to look at OU football, but we make it very apparent that we have these

games and other stuff. We hook them. In fact, many people who play these games are

outside of Oklahoma.

76

Q: Overall, do you see more fantasy sports in the mass media now than you used to?

A: You see it on television broadcasts. They make more of a deal of it than they did five

or seven years ago. They have fantasy shows all the time, and they push to their Web

sites constantly with e-mail questions, go play there, etc. It’s used to complement their

content.


A: A big segment of the market thinks it has to do with gambling or betting. From my

personal standpoint, it’s fun. It’s an enjoyment. And from the feedback we get, people

just think it’s fun. It’s just a distraction. I don’t think people take it too seriously.

Q: What is the benefit of these changes for NewsOK.com?

A: It increases traffic. It keeps people on our site longer. It adds to things we already

have. We can’t give people enough stuff. Everything we’ve done increases our traffic,

but people don’t come to us just to play these games.


A: The Web. Definitely. It’s a huge improvement from how it used to be, and the Web

has helped it explode.

Q: When did fantasy sports first appear in your content?

A: Not long after we launched about three years ago. We launched in ’01. We started

the fantasy games about the time I became ME.

77

Q: Why did NewsOK.com begin using fantasy sports?

A: It just sort of happened. We’re always looking for stuff to enhance and add to our site.

About 4 years ago, I talked to someone about fantasy games, but it was cost-prohibitive.

We didn’t have people asking that “we want the games.” But once we added it, we saw

there was clamoring for it. Our first year was men’s NCAA basketball, and people

wanted the women’s game. We have not added the women’s game because there’s not

that big a demand for it. We do a thing where you can localize games because people

were wanting to use it for high school football. I don’t think there’s a big enough push

for them to develop something like that nationwide, a high school pick-‘em game. We

have done prizes for this, but it varies depending on the advertising staff. We’ve done

free pizza and things like that. We’re about to do something in the fall that will benefit

the newspaper partnership: We used to do a thing called Gridiron Greenbacks in single-

copy sales. It became too complicated with entry forms and things, so now the paper will

tell you to play online, then we’ll tell them that the results are posted in the paper. The

Web has outgrown what the newspaper’s push was. It’s starting to shift a little bit.



A: I’d say it’s a little to the right of middle. It’s not in its infancy at all. Each sport has

its own niche. I know there’s a certain level of information that people are going to say

“I don’t have time to read all the stats.” It’s still a growing market with things like

college basketball and high school football. There’s still potential online. As far as the

big sports go, everybody’s got one. We will continue to refine what we offer. We may

78

add a game. I don’t see people moving away from it, because you have vendors who sell

this product where it requires you to do very little.

79

Jeff Catlin, Program Director, KTCK-AM (1310, Dallas), April 20, 2005

Q: Can you describe your job for me, what you do on a daily basis?

A: I’m responsible for all the programming content, the commercials, and the hosts.

Anything that has to do with the shows, marketing and everything. Basically, if you hear

it on our air, I’m responsible for it.

Q: How long have you worked in radio?

A: I’ve worked in radio for 13 years. And for Susquehanna, which is the parent company

of The Ticket, for 12 years.

Q: How long have you been at The Ticket?

A: I got here in 1994.

Q: How long have you been Program Director?

A: I’ve been programming director since March of 2003. I became assistant

programming director in January of 1996.

Q: What steps do you go through in deciding the content of a program?

A: My biggest role is to be a coach, a guide, a steer. The hosts of the individual shows

are responsible for content on their show. I critique them and coach them and let them

know what we’re trying to achieve, but I’m not involved day-to-day. I might only meet

with them once or twice a week, but I see them everyday and talk to them about what

80

I’ve heard. I’ll probably ask them “What are you working on,” etc. We talk about those

things in meetings, and I’ll stick my head in there. I’m the guy with my hand on the

rudder—but those guys are steering.

Q: Has sports programming content changed in the last few years?

A: Oh, absolutely. No question. The all-sports format was started at WFAN in New

York in the 1990s. The Ticket came on in 1994, and it was very sports-fan oriented, very

X’s and O’s about sports and statistics and information. But that format turned into a six-

month format that was very good fall to winter because of football. But in the summer,

the ratings would drop. It had a lull. As a business model, it didn’t work. We need

ratings and revenue over nine months. We saw that sports fans were going to check us

out no matter what, so we became more “guy talk” to take more of an entertaining slant.

But to be honest, the format is still evolving to this day, as far as the market and

personalities on the station goes. Seventy to 75% of our content is still sports-driven.

The rest is entertainment-driven, and those are the things that people really remember.

But no one covers sports better than we do.

Q: Have your listeners changed, in your opinion?

A: Absolutely. The other thing that changed with sports radio and newspaper was T-1

technology. When The Ticket first started, we had no idea what the Internet was. About

1995 or ‘96, we heard about the Web. Now, everybody’s had the Internet. Sports

information can be gotten by anybody at any time with the touch of a button. In terms of

day-to-day, we needed a different way because they [the listeners] all have the same

81

access that our guys do. But they [the show hosts] can analyze over the big picture.

That’s part of the evolution of the format. The sophistication of our listener has changed.

Through osmosis, they get a lot more information now than they ever did before; now

they just want to have fun. Information overload makes everybody have ADD, and ADD

has made our job even harder. So that’s where that balance has come in.

Q: Is listener interest the thing that drives your programming decisions?

A: It’s one of them. We have to please our listeners. My job is to deliver ratings.

Q: How do you know what they want?

A: We do research, talk to them, e-mail and phone surveys, industry trends to find out

what society is and what the marketplace is. You understand how all these things fit

together. Sometime it’s gut instincts, too. If we’re broadcasting to nobody, they’ll shut

us down.

Q: Does the programming at competitive stations impact your programming decisions?

A: No, not really. We have the heritage in the market. I respect every other radio station

from a competitive standpoint. We’re cognizant of what they’re doing. But we feel

strongly that if we work hard, we should be able to take care of our own business.

82

Q: Does The Ticket try to attract specifically the fantasy sports hobbyists?

A: Absolutely not. Radio is different than another medium. Radio is a broadcast

medium. It is mass communications. We are trying to reach as many people as we can.

Fantasy sports is generally big on the whole, but most fantasy players are in a league with

five, ten, twenty people that they know. It’s different for that guy and his five or ten

buddies than for anyone else in any other league. When you start trying to do broadcast

to what is a massive group of niche people, it just doesn’t work. We used to have a

fantasy football show on Sunday nights. The people that listened wanted to know how

their guy is, and nobody else cares about that dude’s team. In fantasy, it stops being

about the broadcasting of that general thing, and it got our focus off. It’s taking away

from macro team issues because it’s a beehive of individual people that are not related.

The difference is that on an Internet site, it doesn’t matter if they have a million hits if

they’re all at once or over a period of time, you still have a million hits. With TV you

have your main box and a stat crawler, and you can treat it as different mediums. Even in

newspaper it works to some extent. But radio can’t be for the individual. It has to be for

the masses. It just doesn’t work. They don’t need us to get fantasy information. They’ll

get it from their own sources.

Q: Well, do you think it’s possible that a fantasy show would work?

A: Anything is possible if it has all the elements—a great host, new information, new

attitude that appeals to a lot of people—then I don’t see why it wouldn’t work. If you

have those things, people will listen to you. You need great personalities. People like to

listen to them. It doesn’t matter that their content is different. You’d have to figure out a

83

way to do it, and I haven’t heard anybody who’s figured that out. It just turns into a

laundry list of whose going to play and who isn’t, and that’s not very good radio.

84

Mike Hill, sports anchor, ESPN News, June 8, 2005

Q: What is your exact job title?

A: Sports anchor.


A: This is my tenth year. Well, I got my first job in 1995.

Q: How long have you been at ESPN?

A: I’ve been here almost a year.

Q: Do you know about how many households ESPN News reaches?

A: Actually, those numbers just came out, and we reach about 70 million homes now.

Q: What role do you play in selecting content for the broadcast?

A: My co-anchor and I have a say. We all meet about six hours before the show, after the

producers and the coordinating producer have had their meeting. We’ll throw in our two

cents and decide what runs, what doesn’t, and in what order things run.

Q: How many times per week do you anchor?

A: About four or five.

Q: How does what’s on other networks affect your content decisions?

85

A: It doesn’t really. ESPN decides for itself what is newsworthy for ESPN. ESPN wants

to be the leader, and that’s why we call ourselves “The Worldwide Leader in Sports.”

Q: Well, what about other kinds of media, such as the Internet or print?

A: Oh, absolutely. For example, the whole Barry Bonds thing came from the San

Francisco Chronicle’s coverage. We scour newspapers and Web sites, but, of course, we

source things ourselves before we put it on the air.

Q: In what ways have you seen sports broadcast content change since you’ve been in the

business?

A: Well, I’m kind of a different story because I started off local and now I’m national.

The biggest changes have been in the local markets because of ESPN. It’s wiping out

sports in the local market. When I first came on in the air in 1995, I would get six or

seven minutes a night in local markets. Nowadays the consultants—or what I call the

consultants—come in and have determined that local sports isn’t relevant anymore.

People are watching national broadcasts, or they can get stuff off the Internet. The key in

local markets in to stay local. Local, local, local.

Q: Overall, what trends have you noticed regarding fantasy sports in the mass media?

A: It’s huge. When it first began, we thought that all the fantasy leagues were just a lot of

geeks that got together and had never played sports in real life. What we do with it at

ESPN with our “Experts Corners” and things like that is tell players who to pick up, who

to draft, etc. One of the reasons that ESPN News even runs the score panel after the

86

highlights is for fantasy players so they can see how people from their team did that

night. It has definitely expanded.


A: There’s a lot of financial reasons. I think a lot of it has to do with finances. It cost so

much to get in the league. I’ve heard of $1,000 leagues, and more! Sometimes, people

have to pay money just to make a trade or a transaction. It’s become like a small

business. You might be able to join high-stakes leagues in Vegas, like a real owner. It’s

all about the money. People don’t care about the fun. If it’s not about the money, I don’t

think people would do it. I’ve even heard people root against their team, the team they’re

passionate about, just because they want their fantasy players to play well. I remember a

colleague of mine in Dallas who was a big Steelers fan—he had grown up in

Pittsburgh—and they got beat, but we was happy because Marvin Harrison had a good

game against them, and Marvin Harrison was on his fantasy team.

Q: What is the benefit of these changes for the media?

A: Viewers. That’s the bottom line. Even if you don’t like sports, or you’re not a sports

fan, you’re going to watch because you want to see how your fantasy sports players did.

You’ll watch just to see how Ken Griffey Jr. did, if he went 3-for-4, or how many home

runs he hit. It’s huge. The more you can do for fantasy players, the more viewership

you’re going to get. Period. But it’s just like any trend. All of a sudden if more women

were watching sports, we’d start to show more WNBA. Right now fantasy is huge. And

87

the more viewers you have, the more you can change for advertising. Basically it’s

dollars and cents.

Q: In your opinion, for what medium do you think fantasy sports is best suited?

A: I think it’s the Internet. A lot of fantasy leagues are online. You’re competing against

people you’ve never met, sometimes from across the world. It’s definitely the Internet

because you can get the stats right away. In fact, one of the reasons that the NFL has up-

to-the-second stats on the Web is because of fantasy players. You just hit the refresh

button every 15 seconds and you’re ready to go.

Q: When did you personally first become aware there was such a thing as fantasy sports?

A: 1997 in Nashville. I had a news director who was just crazy about it and got me in it.

I had no idea how big it was, but I paid $85 and joined a league. There were guys who

were taking it so seriously—they had three or four magazines, charts, papers, research. I

felt way unprepared. I felt like a fish out of water. In fact, let me tell you how

unprepared I was. I drafted Edgar Renteria back before he was a good hitter, when he

was still with the Marlins, because he played good defense! Of course, defense doesn’t

matter at all in fantasy sports, but I didn’t know anything about fantasy leagues. When I

said his name, that I wanted Edgar Renteria, I heard people snickering, like “what is this

guy doing?” I had no clue. Now I go to the news rack and see fantasy magazines all

over the place. This stuff is huge.

88

Q: When did you first start talking about fantasy sports in your content?

A: I can’t recall exactly when it was. But I can tell you that I have incorporated it within

the sportscast. For example, if the Cardinals are beating the Red Sox like 13-0, or 13-2,

or something like that and all the highlights are Cardinals highlights, I’ll throw out some

Red Sox stats like “Johnny Damon went 3-for-4.” That’s because I know there’s a lot of

people out there who have Johnny Damon on their fantasy team and want to know how

he did.

Q: How would you gauge the impact of fantasy sports on ESPN’s content?

A: I haven’t seen much of a change in the content—just more content. I see it more for

baseball. In fact there’s a new show on Saturdays on ESPN News that has polls and is

more interactive. If you look at the tickers, they’re all for fantasy players now—who’s

doing what, even if the game is still in progress. I just see more and more scoreboards

and more and more tickers in just about every show.



A: I think you’re right in the middle. I would use “saturated” as a word because

everybody has a league, whether it’s on ESPN or Yahoo! or whatever. I know people

who are in three leagues, and they’d be in more if there were more. I can see it declining

when some other niche comes along. Then it might go away. What that will be, I don’t

know.

89

Barry Horn, media columnist, The Dallas Morning News, April 27, 2005

Q: Can you please describe your job for me?

A: I cover the media, primarily the national media. They’re kind of sensitive about me

doing anything with local media because Belo owns this newspaper and WFAA, and if

it’s perceived as a conflict of interest then it’s a conflict of interest. But everything else is

fair game, including radio and broadcasting.

Q: How long have you been doing this?

A: About a dozen years.

Q: How long have you been at The DMN?

A: All that time.

Q: From what you’ve seen during those dozen years, how has sports programming

content changed?

A: There’s been a huge change in television with things like HD. And as far as fantasy

goes, all the NFL pre-game shows, it’s something that they cater to. It was a huge market

that was untapped for awhile. They were geeky until they realized everyone was into it—

probably even the people who are making the broadcast decisions. The real popularity of

March Madness is the brackets, and they watch to see how it came out. That’s expanded

into Sunday morning pre-game shows. They cater to the fans. These networks will do

anything to keep people glued to their TV set to watch their network. The Internet has

made a big difference, too. You used to have to wait until you got the paper and wait to

90

see how your guy did. Then ESPN came along and you could pretty much tell how your

guys were doing. Now comes the Internet, and you could pretty much watch your player

carry-by-carry or pass-by-pass. You need things like an injury report before they set their

lineup. Basically, they’re constantly looking for hooks to create viewers and keep them.

Different sports are different, though. Fantasy baseball is not driven carry-by-carry or

play-by-play. There’s maybe a game a couple of times a week on ESPN. Football is the

easiest to do because it’s concentrated in this one 12-hour period. I know there are

fantasy leagues for everything, but football drives the bus. I know there’s a Fantasy

NASCAR league with people from the networks in it. But it changes you because it

forces you to pay attention. You may not be a NASCAR fan, but if you’ve got a team

with four or five drivers in it, you’re looking to see how your drivers are doing.

Different networks use it in different ways, too. ABC has one game on a Monday night.

They have a captive audience. If you’re at FOX or CBS on Sunday, for those networks

there’s lots of other games going on. ESPN is very big on fantasy, and ABC has kind of

left fantasy to them within the family. But look at which network is obviously more

successful. ABC has an illusion that “Monday Night Football” is bigger than it really is.

“Monday Night Football” is a very snobbish institution because they have their own stats

and everything. That’s just stupid. I just think they’re snobby about it and foolish about

it. By the time they’ve come on, 28 of the 32 teams have already played, so you know

where most of the players stand. But I guarantee you that a good portion of their ratings

over the last few years are the fantasy crowd seeing what one of their receivers is doing.

91

Q: Is it difficult, though, to broadcast fantasy sports when there are only a few viewers

who care about a particular player?

A: If you give an update on one player, that player has an effect on every person in the

league. Either you have him or your opponent has him, there’s a domino effect. I want

to know how the teams around me are doing as well. There’s a huge effect on it, and the

people at the networks are very cognizant of that.

Q: When did fantasy sports first appear start appearing in programming content?

A: CBS and FOX have admitted the existence of fantasy and pandering to the fantasy

crowd. The growth has been spurred by the Internet because you can sit on the computer

and watch your team play and get your updated stats. This is just going to be huge. This

is huge. If they could figure out a way to latch on to this in other sports, they would do it

in a heartbeat. As part of the ESPN deal for $1.1 billion for “Monday Night Football,”

they’re working on a fantasy football league in conjunction with the NFL. That adds

value. The networks are fighting for every viewer and every tenth of a rating point. If

they can prove there’s a market out there, there’s no question that they’ll pander to it.

Q: In your opinion, where is fantasy sports as a programming innovation? In its infancy

stages or more advanced?

A: I think it’s the infancy. If you look at the appeal of football, it’s a very easy sport to

bet on. Gambling and point spreads have a lot to do with the interest in the NFL over the

years. Fantasy football is gambling. It’s just a venue to attract more people. There’s no

92

question that it’s in its infancy. I can envision the day when there’s nothing but a steady

updating stat on the screen. It’s not a fad at all.

93

Charles Polansky, sports writer, Fort Worth Star-Telegram, June 21, 2005


A: Since 1996.

Q: How long have you worked at the Star-Telegram?

A: Since 1998.

Q: How long did you write fantasy sports columns?

A: 18 months or so.

Q: Did you have complete control over what’s in your column—or was a topic assigned

to you?

A: I was pretty much left to do what I wanted with the column, with a few gentle nudges

in a certain direction from time to time. I had an editor that wanted things done a certain

way, writing things specifically about fantasy games and all, but I was able to convince

the powers-that-be to write more generally on sports like most fantasy sites do these days.

Q: How did what was in other newspapers affect your column content?

A: Not really at all. Since I trolled the Internet and the AP Wire for information, I guess

you could say I was affected by that content.

Q: Did other kinds of media—such as the Internet—affect your content decisions?

94

A: Yes. The Internet, I think, has helped fantasy sports explode. It’s so easy to play the

games now, and sites like Yahoo! or ESPN.com do all the dirty work with stat

compilations and so on. The Internet was, and is, invaluable.

Q: In what ways has sports page content changed since you’ve been in the media

business?

A: I’m not sure it’s changed all that much in my seven or so years. There’s probably

more eye-candy, more charts and graphs, help boxes, and cutesy stuff like Q&A’s. But

for the most part, it’s stayed pretty similar.


A: It’s all going to the Internet. I’m not sure there’s much more viable information in

newspapers. The Internet is able to update information immediately and give updates

about players. Like when Mark Prior got hurt earlier this year, the Internet Web sites had

it immediately. I would’ve had to wait several days, perhaps almost a full week, to write

about that in my column if I wanted to do that.


A: Again, the immediacy of the Internet. That kills fantasy sports in newspapers, except

for season preview packages, or weekly fantasy football columns.

95


A: Well, it’s free for one. Granted, not everybody has Internet access, but for me it’s

easier to flip on the computer and hit a few Web sites than pay cash for a newspaper

subscription. Newspapers still carry box scores and news and stuff, but for fantasy sports

spin you’ve got to have Internet access.


A: Without question, the Internet, for the reasons I mentioned earlier.

Q: How does the S-T try to attract the fantasy sports hobbyists in particular?

A: I don’t think we do much anymore. There is a section on the baseball page that

highlights heroes from the night before across the top of the box scores/standings/recap

page. I think USA Today—or maybe it’s The DMN—runs a stat leader part in the game-

by-game results part of the standings package. That’s helpful.

Q: Personally, when did you first become aware there was such a thing as fantasy sports?

A: I joined a fantasy football league when I was in college, probably around ‘95 or so.

Before that, I really didn’t have much knowledge of fantasy sports. I’d heard of

Rotisserie baseball but didn’t know much about it.

96

Q: When did fantasy sports first appear in the S-T?

A: As long as I’ve been here, we’d run a Friday-before-the-weekend fantasy football

column that somebody on the desk would run. It was pretty simple, pretty much a run-

down of that guy’s team, who he played and maybe a hot/not pick for the week.

Q: Why did the S-T begin using fantasy sports?

A: I’m not sure.

Q: How would you gauge the impact of fantasy sports on the S-T’s content?

A: I don’t really think there’s much impact.



A: I’d say it’s somewhere near the beginning, perhaps at the beginning of the middle.

The Internet is only 10- to 15-years-old max, so I think we’re only seeing the tip of the

iceberg in fantasy sports on the ‘Net, which is what has allowed fantasy sports to explode

in recent years.

97

Brendan Roberts, senior editor, The Sporting News, June 1, 2005

Q: What’s your job title?

A: Senior editor. I work mostly online.


A: In total, about 14 years


A: Senior editor for about four years, on the fantasy staff for about 5½ years, at TSN

about nine years.

Q: What is the circulation of The Sporting News?

A: About 750,000

Q: What role do you play in selecting content for the magazine?

A: Very little, actually, if you’re talking about the weekly mag. I worked for the mag

before I worked on the fantasy site, but I don’t do it so much now. And our fantasy mag

page is determined by fellow senior editor George Winkler.

98

Q: Through what process do you decide on content?

A: For the site, we determine based on the abilities of our available writers and the

demand of our e-mailers. For the mag, it’s a mixture of what we feel works, the abilities

of our in-house writers, and the mantra of our editorial staff.

Q: How does what’s in other magazine impact your content decisions?

A: A little, but we don’t consider ourselves “other magazines.” We get ideas from other

magazines, but we rarely are impacted by them.

Q: Do other kinds of media—such as the Internet, television, or radio, for example—

affect your content decisions?

A: A little, especially what our competitors—ESPN, Sportsline—do.

Q: In what ways has content changed since you’ve been in the mass media business?

A: More online, more premium, more specialization. I literally write about fantasy

sports, primarily baseball, which was unheard of years ago. And my columns are read

online, rarely in the magazine, and people are willing to pay money for our content.

Q: In what ways have the expectations of your subscribers changed since you’ve been in

your current position?

A: With the magazine, we’re trying to target a younger and more-casual audience.

Online, there are so many variations of fantasy that we get more and more

specialized/bizarre leagues everyday.

99

Q: How do their interests drive your content decisions?

A: Somewhat, although we still target the standard fantasy owner. For instance, we

rarely target the deep-league points owner because we realized the most common reader

on our site is the standard fantasy owner.

Q: How does advertiser interest drive your content decisions?

A: It rarely does. They are two separate departments, and we they can rarely tell us what

to target. We want to do what we do best.

Q: What are some examples of subscriber-driven content in The Sporting News?

A: Our “Five in Your Face” section is based on the mantra of quick-hitting humor that we

want to achieve now.

Q: How do you know what subscribers want to see?

A: We just get a feel. Also, we have surveys, both in the industry, and across our site and

mag.

Q: Do you know what advertisers want to see?

A: We rarely do. At least in the mag, our ad managers rarely communicate that.

Q: What do you see as the most important function of The Sporting News?

A: To entertain, to teach about the game.

Q: How does fantasy sports fit into that?

100

A: We do just that. For years we did primarily teaching about the game. Now we’re

doing more entertaining, too.


A: There’s more of it, but there’s still not enough of it compared to how many people

play fantasy sports.

Q: Overall, do you see more fantasy sports in the mass media now than you used to?

A: Yes, although there’s still a perception that fantasy sports players are all young college

kids with lots of time on their hands. That’s not true. According to the FSTA survey,

most fantasy owners are in their mid-30s with jobs, wives, kids, etc.


A: A necessity. Though most sports purists don’t play fantasy sports, they had to realize

that it has become popular in both underground and mainstream America.


A: Both an acceptance and a growth of fantasy sports.


A: Online … by far. It’s where most game programs, including TSN Games, are.

101

Q: How does The Sporting News try to attract fantasy sports hobbyists in particular?

A: Through advertising, through our fantasy pages in the mag, and by getting our content

and games sites in front of as many people as possible.

Q: When did you first become aware there was such a thing as fantasy sports?

A: [In] 1991, when I was working at a daily newspaper that had an AL-only points

league.

Q: When did fantasy sports first appear in The Sporting News?

A: About three years ago.

Q: Why did The Sporting News begin using fantasy sports?

A: Because we realized it was a popular activity for sports enthusiasts, i.e., the type of

people who read TSN.

Q: How would you gauge the impact that fantasy sports has had on your content?

A: There’s really no way to. But the growth of our games and our content site

(www.fantasy.sportingnews.com) indicates that more people are coming to us for fantasy

info and games than ever before.



102

A: Somewhere in between, but closer to the infancy stages. It’s not like fantasy is a new

concept. It’s very popular today. There are plenty of publications devoted to it,

especially pre-season publications; however, it’s still not considered popular to the

“mainstream” fan, although surveys show the mainstream fan more or less plays it, at

least fantasy football. It could be a greater factor in our print media, but the process is

slow.

103

David Sessions, media columnist, Fort Worth Star-Telegram, June 2, 2005

Q: Can you give me a description of your job?

A: I’m a sports reporter covering high schools and general assignments, with a weekly

column on sports media.

Q: How long have you covered the media?

A: I took over the “Media Insider” column in August 2004.

Q: How long have you been at the Star-Telegram?

A: Since September 2003.

Q: How has sports programming content changed in the last few years?

A: It has changed mostly in presentation. I think networks are looking for eye-candy to

keep people interested, from the cable cameras hovering over the field to the busy,

expensive sets you see on TNT’s NBA coverage. It’s almost like they feel like people

wouldn’t watch sports if they didn’t jazz it up. I don’t think CBS has that problem with

the Masters, though. In some ways, coverage has improved because there’s so much

information that broadcasters have access to and can pass on. It’s always interesting to

see a graphic that STATS, Inc. dug up quickly about the number of blue-eyed third

basemen to hit for the cycle on Tuesdays. That’s relatively new. The Olympics was the

perfect example of using new technology to enhance viewing—think of the superimposed

flags and names in each lane of the swimming pool. But I also think much of sports

104

programming has changed into this sort of dumbed-down, celebrity-based entertainment

instead of responsible journalism. The same thing is happening at CNN—get a few guys

to yell at each other and some slick graphics and forget about telling in-depth stories or

asking the tough questions. There is way more “Stump the Schwab” and Stuart Scott

mindlessness on ESPN than necessary. I think HBO does a better job at telling stories in

a weekly half-hour show than “SportsCenter” does most nights.

Q: Has what viewers want to see changed?

A: Hard to say. Do viewers have any input in the matter? I think they are more

concerned with stats and their fantasy teams than they were in the past. Viewers still

watch important games and they still largely ignore unimportant ones. And there’s a

certain group that will watch whatever’s on ESPN News for hours a day. I guess the

main thing that has changed is [that] viewers want their information immediately, and a

local news sportscast is not timely or in-depth enough for them. Why would you watch

that when you can actually see the whole press conference, immediately after the game,

on ESPN News?

Q: Have you seen an increase fantasy sports-related content in broadcast over the past

few years?

A: Yes, absolutely.

105

Q: In what way?

A: Stats used to supplement coverage, to explain things. You would see that a guy had

rushed for 100 yards in five consecutive games and think, “he’s having a good year,” or

“that’s a great offensive line,” or whatever. Now you see the same stat and think, “I

should put him on my fantasy team.” So in some ways, the actual game itself is

secondary to the imaginary game. DirecTV is coming out with something they call the

Red Zone channel. It will flip between games and only show teams that are about to

score. Now obviously anyone who watches that doesn’t care about which teams win, but

which players have good performances for their fantasy teams. Last season, ESPN had a

cartoon character segment that broke down fantasy numbers and made suggestions. I

would say no one would have predicted that kind of thing 10 years ago. Every network

that airs NFL games breaks in with crawls listing players’ performances in other games.

I don’t know that that is directly a fantasy influence, but it seems like one.

Q: Is this a direct effort to attract the 15 million fantasy sports hobbyists?

A: Yes. FOX Sports chairman David Hill said so when I asked him if they were trying

specifically to reach fantasy players. The networks get a huge amount of traffic on their

Web sites, where they run fantasy games, and it all ties in and enhances their product.

Q: When did fantasy sports first appear start appearing in programming content?

A: I would say about 1998 or 1999, when the big Web sites like ESPN.com and CBS

SportsLine started offering fantasy games. But I’m not sure when it became such a big

influence, maybe more recently. DirecTV’s NFL package was a big factor; I know my

106

college roommates and I would sit and flip between games until somebody scored. Just

like the Red Zone channel.

Q: How would you gauge the impact of fantasy sports on programming?

A: It creates a fervent fan base for certain sports. You can’t just follow your team, and by

team I mean a real team. You have to watch all the games, and every game has some sort

of impact on your fantasy league. So there’s the added interest from it, and the networks

try to cater to that with stats-oriented reporting and maybe a greater emphasis on injury

reporting.

Q: In your opinion, where is fantasy sports as a programming innovation? In its infancy

stages or more advanced?

A: It’s still early, and we’ll see if someday there’ll be interactive TV where you can input

your own fantasy team and watch those players’ highlights. At the same time, maybe the

luster will wear off fantasy sports a bit and maybe the networks will abandon it. But as

long as they’re driving traffic to the Web sites and creating appointment TV for fans, the

networks will continue to cater to fantasy sports junkies.

107

Joe Trahan, sports anchor/sports reporter, WFAA-TV (Dallas-market ABC affiliate),
June 3, 2005

Q: What’s your job title? What should I call you?

A: Sports anchor/sports reporter


A: It would have been June of ’89, so it’s June now…so I’m coming up on 16 years.


A: I’ve been here the last two years.

Q: Do you know about how many households you reach?

A: That’s a good question. At least a couple million. At least.

Q: Where does that put you in the market?

A: We’ve got the top-ranked 5 p.m. and 6 p.m. newscast, and at 10 p.m. we finished

second.

Q: What role do you play in selecting content?

A: When it comes down to myself, if I’m anchoring the show, I pretty much work in

tandem with our executive producer and our assistant sports director. We all kind of

work together. One guy has the operation side. He said “OK, here’s the people I’m

sending here” [and] he filters that through the content guy and we figure out what we can

108

get. And we kind of establish, “OK, well what do we want?” We all kind of work

together in corroboration. Some days it’s just handed out like “OK, we know we’re

going to be here and here. That just makes sense and we’ll do it.” Other days we have to

make decisions and put our heads together to decide. Basically the way it works, if you’re

anchoring the show you can have veto power. Most of the time.

Q: How many times do you anchor?

A: At least twice a week—on the weekends. At this point of the year, Dale takes off

from now to training camp, so I do all his “Dale Hansen Sports Specials,” and I take a lot

of Thursday and Fridays. So this time of year…quite a bit, yeah. I anchor quite a bit.

Q: How does what’s on other Dallas-area networks affect your content decisions?

A: Well, in our business we always check the competition. But what we do at WFAA,

we’ve been the industry leader, I think, as far as local sports goes. With a guy like Dale,

we’ve been the industry leader. We’ve been innovative and found creative ways of doing

things. So while we may be watching, we still kind of do our own thing. We think we’ve

got the resources, the people power to do things maybe a little bit differently and a little

bit better. A lot of times, we try to set the market and let everybody catch up with us.

Q: Do other kinds of media—such as Internet—affect your content decisions?

A: It definitely all factors in. In fact, I read what’s in print first. I look at the newspapers.

I think the Web is great tool for us in sports because I can literally go to sportspages.com

and find any sports page in America and get the local take on what the big story is. For

109

me, it gives perspective more than anything. It can help you out with that. But as far as

actually deciding what goes on our air, we make those decisions, you know? If it’s local,

that’s the most important; if it’s going to affect people in our community. Those are the

most important…at the front of the decision. It’s got to be local, and it’s got to affect

people who live in our community, because that’s what we cover. After that, when it

comes to some of those national stories, that’s where those resources like the Web and

those other sports pages comes into perspective.

Q: In what ways has content changed since you’ve been in the mass media business?

A: It’s in part because of cable television, basically. Sixteen years ago, when I first

started in the business, I would show a couple of highlights from Major League games,

and I also made sure that I showed every Major League score. You would see graphics

with scoreboards. Well, Dale was one of the first people to stop doing them. I stopped

doing them several years ago as well when I was working in New Orleans, before I was

working here. You don’t need to do that anymore with the Web, with cable TV.

Anybody who’s a sports fan knows all they have to do is click on ESPN and look at the

bottom line and they’ve got their scores in two minutes. That means I don’t have to—I

don’t want to say waste—I don’t have to spend that time on those scoreboard graphics. I

could be spending that on other local news that affects our community, or other things we

deem to be important.

110

Q: Would one broadcast time vary from another broadcast time? Like would you maybe

see those scoreboard graphics at 10 p.m., or on the first newscast of the morning?

A: We don’t do them at all anymore here at ‘FAA. We don’t do them. At all. Period.

Because we know that people are savvy enough and that they’ve got the resources that

they don’t need us to do them. In fact, I don’t know that…if there are still local

sportscasters doing scoreboard graphics, other than on the bottom line, I would call that,

at this point, a waste of time. That’s not a good use of your resources if you’re a

sportscaster because while you’re jabbering about that, you should be talking about

something else, spending that time more wisely.

Q: What trends have you noticed regarding fantasy sports in the mass media?

A: I think the biggest impact that fantasy sports has had broadcast-wise you can find by

looking at ESPN and ESPN2. They’ve got full segments that are targeted at fantasy

players. They have got the time and the ability to put those numbers and talk about those

numbers. They’ve got fantasy football analysts during football season. They come on

every week. And you also notice that during a lot of their specialty shows like “Inside

the NBA” or the baseball show that they do, they will do “Inside the Numbers.” And all

that is geared at fantasy players because they want to give them the numbers.

Now, on a local level…I am broadcast. And the cable guys, why they can do this so well,

they are narrowcast. And because I’m broadcasting, it’s tough for me to get bogged

down in numbers, because the research shows that when you start getting bogged down

in numbers, that’s when you start to lose the person who isn’t that hardcore fan. And I’ve

111

got to go get them! I’ve got to go get those people. I can’t lose those people. So I think

on local level it is more difficult to get that fantasy player what they need. Everybody in

here…I’m not in one right now, but just about everybody in here in this department has

played in a fantasy league in the last two or three years. I’m also savvy enough to know

that they can get their stats in a heartbeat. So I feel like they’re taken care of. And if

they’re not they know how to be. What they do like is the analytic stuff that the ESPNs

can give them, and the CNNs. They like that analysis. They do it on radio as well, I’ve

heard, where they try to pick out the guy who’s going to be flying under radar that might

be a good fantasy pickup and all those kind of things. But it’s tough on a local level to

specifically target that person.


A: I think they realized just how big it’s become. Anybody who’s involved with sports

knows. With the way the Web and different outlets have made it so easy to put together a

fantasy league and to manage a fantasy league, we all know that. Now instead of having

to get on the phone and having to have this draft and it used to be that if you wanted to

make transactions you had to call the commissioner…well it’s not like that anymore. It’s

just a few points and clicks, and that’s helped it explode even further. And because of

that, I think the big broadcast boys like your ESPNs of the world know that if they don’t

cater to those people they’re missing out on opportunities. I’m sure they’ve got a lot of

that stuff sponsored, so it’s also made new revenue streams for them by catering to that

fantasy fan. And when you talk about new revenue streams they’re going to jump all

over that, we know that!

112


A: That’s a good question. That’s a good question. From my own personal experience,

when I was playing fantasy football, the best medium for me was the Web. The ability to

quickly get what I needed tailor-made for me…if I had Duece McAllister as one of my

running backs, I knew that there were five or six sites I could go to before his game was

even over. There were several times when I’d be on the road, I could go online while I

was covering the Saints and check out some of my other guys at halftime and see what

they were doing. There was so much content there. There are so many different outlets.

I just think it’s awesome. It’s made it really easy for the fantasy fan to follow what they

do. And instantaneously, too…that’s the thing. Every major sports franchise now has

instantaneous Web coverage. You can follow a game on the Web, and I do this quite

often while game is going on. I can get stats instantaneously. Hit refresh, and you’re

update to the last second of stuff. And that’s what the fantasy guy wants. That’s the

heart of it, is the stats, and I think the Web does the best job of that because it’s

instantaneous.

Q: Does WFAA try to attract the fantasy sports hobbyists in particular?

A: I think that’s where our Web comes in to play. That’s where WFAA.com really

comes in to play, and they do a good job of it. Like I said, as soon as the game’s over

you can get the box score pretty much instantaneously. It will be on our Web site, and

you’ve got what you want, you’ve got what you need. I think that’s how we’re doing it,

because I think we give the fantasy fan credit that they will know how to get what they

need. If we can push them to the Web and get some page hits from it, that’s good for us.

113

Q: What about over the air? Do you guys do anything different now because of fantasy?

A: Good question. I was actually thinking about this on drive down this morning. I

really don’t think we do; although…the one thing I do is I will throw in mentions when a

guy is having a good season, when he’s putting up big numbers, I will throw out the term

“fantasy favorite” or “fantasy football favorite.” You know? “Oh, this guy is really

becoming a fantasy football favorite! He’s been catching touchdown passes, that’s

twelve for the year…yadda, yadda, yadda.” I will throw that in. That’s probably the only

tangible thing that’s difference. I think that’s significant because in that instance I am

speaking directly to the fantasy fan. On a broader-based perspective everybody may not

know what I’m talking about but by now they’ve got an inkling. They might just have an

inkling. “Oh yeah, that fantasy stuff.” But the fantasy fan is like, “So Joe’s keeping up!”

He knows that I know what I’m talking about, so I do throw that in.

Q: What do you think when you hear like Boomer Esiason during the coverage of the

game, when Freddie Mitchell catches a touchdown pass, he said “Oh…that’s great! He’s

on my fantasy team”?

A: Oh yeah! That’s the other thing! You hear that all the time now. And that just helps

the snowball of fantasy keep rolling. We’ve all played it, and it’s from everyone

involved on all sides. Producers, the guys who are making the decisions, they’re all

playing. It’s just one happy family when it comes to fantasy. Everybody loves it.

Everybody who’s in the business, everybody who’s covering the business, can relate.

114



A: Right. I think it’s got a core foothold. I think those of us who are in the media

understand that there is this core foothold of people who are doing it. And we’ve got to

wait to see if it explodes and continues or if it levels off. I’m not ready to call it a plateau

yet. With all the kids who come up now playing PlayStation, they should be able to

translate that into a fantasy football environment for them. And if they can find a link

between that, between the video gamer and the fantasy player, that’s dynamite.

Q: Is that the next thing? You start hearing Al Michaels talking about a guy making

“PlayStation moves” or something like that?

A: Absolutely. Not only that, I think the PlayStation thing is already here because of

John Madden. John Madden worked so closely with EA Sports that there are times—and

this is a quote—when they try to make the broadcast look like what’s on the video game,

as opposed to vice versa. That in and of itself is part of what makes EA Sports so

popular. That Madden genre specifically is what I’m talking about, about what makes it

so popular.

115

Q: Anything else to add?

A: I wish we could do more on the local level. It’s a function of time though. It’s really

a function of time.

Q: What would you like to do, like a show similar to what’s on TXCN?

A: Yeah, a “Fantasy Corner” or anything that would cater specifically. But again, we get

into that narrowcasting-broadcasting issue. We’re still broadcasters. I’m a broadcaster.

It would be nice to find a niche for it, but as of yet I don’t know if we’re at the point

where we could find one and make it viable in broadcasting. It’s segmented. But you see

these preview shows, that could certainly help. You could preview the week and put it in

a fantasy context. You could preview the week the ask the questions for fantasy fans,

like “Should I start…” different scenarios. “Do you think I should sit Brian Westbrook

this week?” You know? And of course the injury issue is incredibly important. You

could do it very well by covering a couple of bases.

116

David Young, fantasy sports columnist, CNNSI.com, June 7, 2005

Q: What’s your exact job title?

A: Well, I’m not really an employee of Sports Illustrated. I’m the baseball and football

editor for the “Talented Mister Roto” Web site (www.talentedmrroto.com). We share

content with SI. We run about 24 baseball columns a week, and we give four to them.


A: Just a couple years, doing the writing. March of ’04. But I’ve been playing fantasy

sports since 2001. I first heard of fantasy sports in 1984, when I worked for Chevron and

some of the engineers were playing fantasy sports. They cut out the box scores and made

a spread sheet and all that, but I didn’t get involved because that was too complicated.

Q: Hold on. I have to ask how you get from Chevron to journalism?

A: My undergrad was in chemical engineering. I did that for three years, then went to law

school at Penn. There was another three years. I worked for a law firm, and then like any

lawyer I had my fill of it. So I started writing. The question was finding my niche where

I could fit in. This guy, Matt Berry, started this web site, Talented Mister Roto, and he

put out feelers. So I sent him some stuff, and it worked out well. This year, SI contacted

him about sharing columns, and two of mine ended up there. Part of it was just finding

the opportunity.

Q: How many hits does Talented Mister Roto receive?

117

A: Overall, about 10,000 per month. Basically, we have about 24 baseball columns a

week, and each one of them gets about 300 to 1,200 hits per week. The mean is around

600 per column per week. With football, we get more hits for the same number of

columns. We also have columns for things like NASCAR, arena football, and golf, about

10 columns total for those sports.

Q: What role do you play in selecting content?

A: Within Talented Mister Roto, myself and my editor sat down at the beginning of the

season—well, about February—and created a list of 24 different columns to be run, and

what made sense on what day. That list has pretty much survived, I think, with a few

exceptions. In terms of the idea, it was me and my editor, with Matt overseeing it. We

give our writers a lot flexibility. That’s kind of how the site advertises itself—you get the

fantasy sports information but it’s entertaining to read. For SI, they looked at the 24

columns, and they picked the four that they liked. We give them what they expect, but

they also have the latitude to edit anyway they want. It’s not been anything terrible.

Q: Overall, what trends have you noticed regarding fantasy sports in the mass media?

A: SI has its own menu column for fantasy sports on the home page. Going back to 1984

and people had to write this by hand, that was very difficult. Then it became a killer app

for the Internet. I’d put fantasy sports up there with e-mail and pornography as a reason

to bring people to the Internet. In terms of fantasy sports, it just doesn’t work in other

media. By the time you see it in a magazine, it’s already old. It doesn’t work on TV

because there’s so much information. Well, it works better for football on TV because

118

it’s all on one day. On the Internet, it makes a difference to bringing people there. It’s

kind of easy to tell somebody’s track record.

I liken it to Star Wars fans when those movies come out. Between the times the movies

are out, tou don’t want to look like a geek by talking about it all the time. But when the

movies come out, you can get out the Darth Vader costume and go stand in line. In the

last few years it’s become more accepted. You go to parties now and people start talking

about their fantasy teams. It’s even leaking out of sports and into other people’s areas of

expertise. My boss is in a fantasy movie league, where you draft movies that are going to

be released over the last year. He won a lot of money last year because he drafted The

Passion of the Christ for a dollar. It sets off the same neurons in your head that following

the stock market would. I’ve always said that baseball could stop playing tomorrow and

just put out random numbers, and we would just use those. The game doesn’t even have

to occur!

Q: Do other kinds of media—such as television—affect your content decisions?

A: It can. I don’t think that Internet media and television media and print media are

independent of each other. What we’re going to see though is less on TV, but more

streaming video on the Net. I’ve seen more of other sites immolating what we’re doing

than the other way around because we’ve pretty much hit every topic.

Q: Did CNNSI.com begin using fantasy sports only with you, or did they have fantasy

content before you?

119

A: They had it before that, though it was less conspicuous and less frequent. Right now

they’re running a column a day, whereas before I tried to find info from them as a player

and it was maybe two or three pieces of information per week. Their info has increased

because they see it as a way to increase hits. It’s definitely a way to increase hit counts.



A: There’s no data to show it, but my feeling is that I think we’ve crested. It’s like

steroids: Once Congress hears about it, it’s over. SI did a big story on it in their

magazine last year, about how celebrities are playing fantasy sports and how Michael J.

Fox jumped out of cab to draft a pitcher, and I think that was the peak. I’m confident in

the 24 columns that we have standing alone, but when you add it to all those other sites,

people’s needs are more than being met. We’ll get burned out and be on to something

else. It’s just like a fantasy baseball season. In April, everybody’s in to it. By July half

the owners are out of it, so only half the owners care. By Sept., it’s only one or two

owners who care about it.

Q: Anything else?

A: Well, I’ll just say that it’s a silent majority. There’s a lot of people who play these

sports, but it’s not 100% mainstream. It’s not something you start a conversation with.

There are people from all walks off life doing this. I mean, I get e-mails from all around

the world for people who are law professors, I get women, I get people from all around

the world. It’s everywhere.

120

REFERENCES

Associated Press Sports Editors (2004). 2004 APSE section winners. Retrieved

June 24, 2005 from

http://apse.dallasnews.com/contest/2004/sections/sections.over250.html

Baker, D. (2004, September 21). Living a fantasy (league). San Francisco

Chronicle. Retrieved March 11, 2005 from http://sfgate.com/cgi-

bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/09/21/BUGI18S4VN1.DTL.

Ballard, C. (2004). Fantasy world. Sports Illustrated, 100(25), 18.

Banks, S.P., Louie, E., & Einerson, M (2000). Constructing personal identities in

holiday letters. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(3), 299-327.

Baxter, L.A. & Babbie, E. (2004). The Basics of Communication Research.

Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson.

Berentson, B. (2000, September 11). Steinbrenner wannabes: Here’s a way to

trade online like a pro without losing your shirt. Forbes, 166(7), 38-40.

Berg, B. (2004). Qualitative Research Method for the Social Sciences (5th ed.).

Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Biro, L. (2004, November 29). No time for Big Ben on my team. The Dallas

Morning News.

Blair, M.E. (1993, Winter). Commercialization of the rap music youth subculture.

Journal of Popular Culture, 27(3), 21-33.

121

Buck, R. (2005, July 20). He may be 67 but the Rangers could use him. Fort

Worth Star-Telegram.

Callaway (2005). STATS, Inc. and Global Wireless drive fantasy game for

Callaway Golf; Callaway Golf becomes first equipment manufacturer to offer fantasy

sports. Retrieved on June 9, 2005 from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/printdoc.

Campbell, R. (2003). Media & Culture: An Introduction to Mass Communication

(3rd ed.). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

Carvalho, J. (2004). Bad times but still swingin’: World Series coverage before

and during the Depression. NINE: A Journal of Baseball History and Culture, 13(1), 81-

93.

Choi, C. (2002). The ESPN effect: How ESPN has transformed local sportscasts.

Unpublished master’s thesis, Georgetown University.

Cooper, B.S. (2004). Going beyond traditional sport fandom: Development of the

fantasy sports participation motivation scale. Unpublished master’s thesis, California

State University, Fullerton.

Cummings, T. A summer of change for fantasy sports hobbyists. Fort Worth Star-

Telegram, August 31, 1998.

de Beer, A.S. & Merrill, J.C. (eds.) (2004). Global Journalism: Topical Issues and

Media Systems (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Deford, F. (Speaker) (2002, October 9). Americans participating in fantasy sports

more than real sports. (Radio broadcast). Washington, D.C.: National Public Radio.

Eastman, S., & Ferguson, D. (2002). Broadcast/Cable/Web Programming:

Strategies and Practices (6th ed.). Belmont, Ca.: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

122

Fallon, P., Katzman, M., & Wooley, S. (1994). Feminist perspectives on eating

disorders. New York: Guilford.

Fantasy Sports Trade Association (2003). Statistics about fantasy sports retrieved

on March 2, 2005 from www.fsta.org/about.shtml.

Flood, J. (2004). Winners or losers: Participants in fantasy game redefine leisure

sports. Parks & Recreation, 12(2).

Felps, P. (2000, September 20). Fantasy sports players getting a big assist from

the Internet. The Dallas Morning News.

Ferguson, M. (1983). Forever Feminine. London: Heinemann.

Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory:

Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

Groesz, L.M., Levine, M.P., & Murnen, S.K. (2002, January). The effect of

experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction: A meta-analytic

review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31(1), 1-16.

The Guardian (2004, October 26). British football matches are facing a press

blackout. The Guardian.

Ha, L., & Chan-Olmstead, S. (2002, October). Consumers’ use of Enhanced TV

features and interest in e-commerce on cable network Web sites. Electronic Markets,

12(4), 237-247.

Hiltner, J., & Walker, J. (1996). Super frustration Sunday: The day Prodigy’s

fantasy baseball died; an analysis of the dynamics of electronic communication. Journal

of Popular Culture, 30(3), 103-117.

123

Hunt, G., & Eadie, W. (1987). Interviewing: A Communication Approach. New

York: CBS College Publishing.

Iole, K. (2004, December 4). Rodeo contest becomes reality. Las Vegas Review-

Journal.

Ipsos (2003). Ipsos marketing survey, as cited in The Wichita Eagle, September 2,

2003.

Isidore, C. (2003). The ultimate fantasy—profits. CNN/Money. Retrieved

November 17, 2004 from

http://money.cnn.com/2003/08/29/commentary/column_sportsbiz/sportsbiz.

Kilen, M. (2004, September 11). Fantasy Frenzy. Des Moines Register.

LaFollette, M.C. (2002, September). A survey of science content in U.S.

television broadcasting, 1940s through 1950s. Science Communication, 24(1), 34-71.

Lindlof, T., & Taylor, B. (2002). Qualitative Communication Research Methods

(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage Publications.

Maccoby, E.E. (1963). The effects of television on children. In The Science of

Human Communication, ed. W. Schramm, 116-127. New York: Basic Books.

Majumdar, B. (2003). The vernacular in sports history. The International Journal

of the History of Sport, 20(1), 107-125.

Markowitz, S., Grossman, M, & Page, M.P. (1998). Alcohol regulation and

violence towards children. Working Paper no. 6359. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of

Economic Research.

124

McComas, K.A., Shanahan, J., & Butler, J.S. (2001, July). Environmental content

in prime-time network TV’s non-news entertainment and fictional programs. Society &

Natural Resources, 14(6), 533-542.

McCracken, G. (1988). The Long Interview. Newbury Park, Ca.: Sage

Publications.

McQuail, D. (1985). Sociology of mass communication. Annual Review of

Sociology, 11, 93-111.

Mencher, M. (2003). News Reporting and Writing (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-

Hill.

Multimedia Publisher (2002). Fantasy Sports to launch first hot rod fantasy game,

Multimedia Publisher, 13(5), 1-2.

Myers, P.N., & Biocca, F.A. (1992). Elastic body image: The effect of television

advertising and programming on body image distortions in young women. Journal of

Communication, 42, 108-133.

O’Brien, K. (2005, July 20). Soriano may follow A-Rod out. Fort Worth Star

Telegram.

Patel, P. (2002, October 23). SportsLine finds real money in fantasy leagues. Fort

Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel.

Polansky, C. (2003, August 27). Here’s a five-step program to find fantasy

diamonds. Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

Rich, C. (2005).Writing and Reporting News: A Coaching Method. Belmont, CA:

Thomson/Wadsworth.

125

Roberts, C.W. (Ed.) (1997). Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for

Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Transcripts. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence

Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Rouse, M.G. (1978). Daytime radio programming for the homemaker, 1926-1956.

Journal of Popular Culture, 12(2), 315-328.

Rowell, S. (2003). Strategies used in rotisserie baseball and their effects on the

player’s auction. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Maryland.

Runett, R. (2002, December). 2002 rewound: Web publishers describe the year’s

top achievements. Newspaper Association of America Electronic Media Analysis.

Retrieved on November 17, 2004 from

http://www.naa.org/artpage.cfm?AID=4786&SID=108.

Schultz, B.E. (2002). The effect of age and background of religious broadcasting

executive on digital television implementation. Journal of Media and Religion, 1(4), 217-

229.

Schwarz, A. (2004). The Numbers Game: Baseball’s Lifelong Fascination with

Statistics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for

Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College

Press.

Shipman, F. (2001). Blending the real and virtual: Activity and spectatorship in

fantasy sports. Paper presented at the Conference on Digital Arts and Culture.

www.sportsillustrated.cnn.com (2005). Home Web page of Sports Illustrated

magazine and the Cable News Network. http://www.sportsillustrated.cnn.com/

126

Stovall, J.G. (2004). Web Journalism: Practice and Promise of a New Medium.

Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Strasburger, V.C., & Donnerstein, E. (2000). Children, adolescents, and the media

in the 21st century. Adolescent Medicine, 11, 51-68.

Strasburger, V.C., & Wilson, B.J. (2002). Children, Adolescents, and the Media.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

Straubhaar, J., & LaRose, R. (2002). Media Now: Communications Media in the

Information Age (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson.

Suttell, S. (2004, August 23). Fantasy leagues fuel fever: Hobby hits home with

million of die-hards. Crain’s Cleveland Business, 25(34), 15.

Tedeschi, B. (2003, March 3). Advertisers find a demographic gold mine: Fantasy

sports. New York Times, p. C3.

Thé, K.P. (2004, October 2). Life is just…fantasy football. Arizona Daily Star.

Todd, S., Christensen, J., Godfrey, C., Grange, R., Wheeler, J., Randle, Q., &

Smith, B. (2003, November). Participation in Internet fantasy sports leagues and mass

media use. Paper presented at the Conference of Expanding Convergence: Media Use in a

Changing Information Environment, Columbia, SC.

Tuchman, G. (1978). The symbolic annihilation of women. In Hearth and Home,

ed. G. Tuchman, A.K. Daniels, J. Benet, 3-26. New York: Oxford University Press.

Turow, J. (1982). The role of the audience in publishing children’s books. Journal

of Popular Culture, 16(2), 90-99.

Tygiel, J. (2000). Past Time: Baseball as History. New York: Oxford University

Press.

127

Umstead, R.T. (2003, December 1). Turning fan fantasy into cold cash: Stat-based

games rise in popularity with sports-TV programmers. Multichannel News, 24(48), 32,

36.

U.S. Census Bureau (2003). Media data retrieved on May 9, 2005 from

http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/04statab/infocomm.pdf

Valente, T.W. & Rogers, E.M. (1995). The origins and development of the

diffusion of innovations paradigm as an example of scientific growth. Scientific

Communication, 16(3), 242-273.

Villani, S. (2001). Impact of media on children and adolescents: A 10-year review

of the research. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,

40, 392–401

Waldfogel, J. (2001). Who benefits whom in local television markets?

Unpublished manuscript, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

Wendel, T. (2004, September 20). How fantasy games have changed fans. USA

Today, 23A.

Whitlam, S., & Preston, H. (1998, August). New Library World, 99(5), 194-204.

Wilber, R., & Miller, R. (2003). Modern Media Writing. Belmont, CA;

Wadsworth/Thomson.

Wimmer, R.D., & Dominick, J.R. (2003). Mass Media Research, An Introduction

(7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson.

Wirakartakushumah, D.N. (2003, April). Prospects of fantasy sports as a

profitable marketing media [sic]. Kinesiology Abstracts, 16(1), np.

128

BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION

Danny Woodward earned his bachelor’s degree in journalism from The

University of Texas at Arlington in Arlington, Texas. He will pursue a Ph.D. in political

communication from The University of Oklahoma in Norman, Okla. Besides studying

(and playing) fantasy sports, he is interested in researching political speeches and speech

writing. Woodward, a lifelong baseball fan, lives in Fort Worth, Texas, with his wife and

their spoiled-rotten Boston terrier.

129

An research paper

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to An research paper

More from Danny Steve

Recently uploaded

An research paper