Downloaded 49 times
![The United State Pharmacopoeia 24; The National
Formulary 19; 2000: [1225] VALIDATION OF
COMPENDIAL METHODS.
http://www.labcompliance.com/methods/meth_val.
htm#introduction
http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/2396dft.htm
www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/
ac/02/slides/3841s1_07_lachman.PPT
http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/ameth.htm](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/analyticalmethodvalidation-140929002805-phpapp01/75/Analytical-method-validation-25-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byMalla Reddy College of Pharmacy
Analytical method validation
This document summarizes guidelines for analytical method validation from various regulatory agencies. It discusses the purpose of validation to verify method suitability. Key analytical performance characteristics covered include specificity, linearity, range, accuracy, precision, detection/quantitation limits, robustness, and system suitability testing. It notes that revalidation may be necessary if the analytical method or drug product is changed.
More Related Content
Similar to Analytical method validation
Analytical method validation
- 1.
- 2. PUBLISHED GUIDANCES ICH-Q2A“Text on Validation of Analytical Procedure:(1994) ICH-Q2B “Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology: (1995) CDER “Reviewer Guidance: Validation of Chromatographic Method” (1994) CDER “Submitting Samples and Analytical Data for Method Validations” (1987) CDER Draft “Analytical Procedures and Method Validation” (2000) CDER “Bioanalytical Method Validation for Human Studies” (1999) USP<1225> “Validation of Compendial Methods” (current revision)
- 3. QC WHY ANALYTICALMETHOD VALIDATION Verifying system suitability For submission to Compendia Part of registration application
- 4. SUBMISSION TO THECOMPENDIA RATIONALE PROPOSED ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE DATA ELEMENTS
- 5. TYPES OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES TO BE VALIDATED Identification tests. Quantitative tests for impurities' content. Limit tests for the control of impurities. Quantitative tests of the active moiety in samples of drug substance or drug product or other selected component(s) in the drug product.
- 6. CONSIDERATIONS PRIOR TOMETHOD VALIDATION Suitability of Instrument Status of Qualification and Calibration Suitability of Materials Status of Reference Standards, Reagents, etc. Suitability of Analyst Status of Training and Qualification Records Suitability of Documentation Written analytical procedure and proper approved protocol with pre-established acceptance criteria.
- 7. EXAMPLES OF METHODSTHAT REQUIRE VALIDATION DOCUMENTATION CHROMATOGRAPHIC METHODS SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHODS CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS METHODS PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS METHODS DISSOLUTION METHODS TITRATION METHODS AUTOMATED ANALYTICAL METHODS
- 8. ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION Validation of an analytical method is the process by which it is established, by laboratory studies, that the performance characteristics of the method meet the requirements for the intended analytical applications.
- 9. TYPICAL ANALYTICAL PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS USED IN METHOD VALIDATION Specificity (Selectivity) Linearity Range Accuracy Precision Detection Limit Quantitation Limit Robustness System Suitability Testing
- 10. SPECIFICITY SPECIFICITY isthe ability to assess unequivocally the analyte in presence of components which may be expected to be present. DETERMINATION IDENTIFICATION TESTS ASSAY AND IMPURITY TEST(S) – Impurities are available – Impurities are not available
- 11. LINEARITY LINEARITY ofan analytical procedure is its ability (within a given range) to obtain test results which are directly proportional to the concentration (amount) of analyte in the sample. DETERMINATION- Linearity should be evaluated by visual inspection of a plot of signals as a function of analyte concentration or content. NOTE For the establishment of linearity, a minimum of five concentrations is recommended.
- 13. RANGE RANGE ofan analytical procedure is the interval between the upper and lower concentration (amounts) of analyte in the sample (including these concentrations) for which it has been demonstrated that the analytical procedure has a suitable level of precision, accuracy and linearity. DETERMINATION-The specified range is normally derived from linearity studies and depends on the intended application of the procedure.
- 14. ACCURACY ACCURACY ofan analytical method is the closeness of test results obtained by that method to the true value. DETERMINATION-Accuracy should be established across the specified range of the analytical procedure. ASSAY – Drug Substance – Drug Product IMPURITIES (QUANTITATION) NOTE Accuracy should be assessed using a minimum of 9 determinations over a minimum of 3 concentration levels covering the specified range (i.e., three concentrations and three replicates of each).
- 15. PRECISION PRECISION ofan analytical method is the degree of agreement among individual test results when the method is applied repeatedly to multiple samplings of a homogenous sample. DETERMINATION- A sufficient number of aliquots of a homogeneous sample are assayed to be able to calculate statistically valid estimates of standard deviation or relative standard deviation. Repeatability Intermediate precision Reproducibilty
- 16. DETECTION LIMIT DETECTIONLIMIT of an individual analytical procedure is the lowest amount of analyte in a sample which can be detected but not necessarily quantitated, under the stated experimental conditions. DETERMINATION- Several approaches for determining the detection limit are possible, depending on whether the procedure is a non-instrumental or instrumental. BASED ON VISUAL EXAMINATION BASED ON SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO
- 17. QUANTITATION LIMIT QUANTITATIONLIMIT of an individual analytical procedure is the lowest amount of analyte in a sample which can be quantitatively determined with suitable precision and accuracy. DETERMINATION- Several approaches for determining the detection limit are possible, depending on whether the procedure is a non-instrumental or instrumental. BASED ON VISUAL EXAMINATION BASED ON SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO
- 18. LOQ, LOD andSNR Limit of Quantitation Limit of Detection Signal to Noise Ratio noise Peak A LOD Peak B LOQ Baseline
- 19. RUGGEDNESS RUGGEDNESS ofan analytical method is the degree of reproducibility of test results obtained by the analysis of the same samples under a variety of conditions, such as different laboratories different analyst, different instruments, different lots of reagent, different elapsed assay times, different assay temperatures, different days, etc. NOTE Included in but not in
- 20. ROBUSTNESS ROBUSTNESS ofan analytical procedure is a measure of its capacity to remain unaffected by small, but deliberate variations in method parameters and provides an indication of its reliability during normal usage. DETERMINATION- The evaluation of robustness should be considered during the development phase and depends on the type of procedure under study.
- 21. SYSTEM SUITABILITY TESTING SYSTEM SUITABILITY TESTING is an integral part of many analytical procedures. The tests are based on the concept that the equipment, electronics, analytical operations and samples to be analyzed constitute an integral system that can be evaluated as such.
- 22. Recommended Validation Characteristicsof the Various Types of Tests
- 23. REVALIDATION MAY BENECESSARY IN THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES: changes in the synthesis of the drug substance; changes in the composition of the finished product; changes in the analytical procedure; The degree of revalidation required depends on the nature of the changes. Certain other changes may require validation as well.
- 24. Enlist published guidancespertaining to analytical method validation. (2 marks) Why to go for analytical method validation? (2 marks) Enlist typical analytical performance characteristics used in method validation. (2 marks) Explain any four analytical performance characteristics in detail. (10 marks) When is revalidation necessary? (2 marks)
- 25. The United StatePharmacopoeia 24; The National Formulary 19; 2000: [1225] VALIDATION OF COMPENDIAL METHODS. http://www.labcompliance.com/methods/meth_val. htm#introduction http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/2396dft.htm www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ ac/02/slides/3841s1_07_lachman.PPT http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/ameth.htm
- 26. http://www.ich.org http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/425 2fnl.htm http://www.pharmtech.com/pharmtech/dat a/articlestandard/pharmtech/102003/483 14/article.pdf http://www.ivstandards.com/tech/reliabilit y/part17.asp http://www.aoac.org/