Download to read offline
![■Dataset and experimental setup
Distribution of head pose angle in the free head movement
• Using POSIT(Pose from Orthography and Scaling with Iterations)
• Pitch : [0°, 15°], Yaw : [-10°, 10°]
Mean grayscale intensity of images
• Darker light condition has a lower mean grayscale intensity
Experimental result(2/10)
Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 18](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/appearancebasedgazeestimationusingdeepfeaturesandrandomforestregression-210528115146/75/Appearance-based-gaze-estimation-using-deep-features-and-random-forest-regression-18-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byJaey Jeong
Appearance based gaze estimation using deep features and random forest regression
This document summarizes a research paper on appearance-based gaze estimation using deep feature extraction and random forest regression. The method uses a single webcam under natural light to capture eye images, extracts deep features from the images using CNN, and maps the features to gaze coordinates using random forest regression. Experimental results show the deep feature approach improves gaze estimation accuracy compared to other methods, and works well under different lighting conditions and with free head movement. The approach could potentially be applied to real-time driver gaze tracking.
More Related Content
Similar to Appearance based gaze estimation using deep features and random forest regression
![[NS][Lab_Seminar_240626]GazeGNN: A Gaze-Guided Graph Neural Network for Chest...](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/nslabseminar240626gazegnn-240628124202-1359200b-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
Appearance based gaze estimation using deep features and random forest regression
- 1. Interaction Lab. KumohNational Institute of Technology Appearance-based gaze estimation using deep feature and random forest regression Knowledge-Based System 2016. Jeong JaeYeop
- 2. ■Intro ■Method ■Experimental result ■Conclusion Agenda Interaction Lab.,Kumoh National Institue of Technology 2
- 3. Intro Method Experimental result Data EngineeringLab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 3
- 4. ■Gaze Significant rolein understanding human attention, feeling and mind • Cognitive processes analysis • Human computer interaction Non-intrusive gaze tracking systems • One single web camera under natural light with free head movement • Hard to get accuracy Intro(1/4) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 4
- 5. ■Gaze estimation methods Feature-based method • Depend on pupil detection with the light sources’ reflections on cornea • Map from pupil center of geometry model to the gaze calibration points • High accuracy, fluctuate strongly due to free head movement Appearance-based method • Point representation in high dimensional space • Learn the mapping relation from this point in given feature space to screen coordinates Intro(2/4) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 5
- 6. Intro(3/4) Interaction Lab., KumohNational Institue of Technology 6
- 7. ■Focus Deep featureextraction and feature forest regression • Using one web camera under natural light • Free head movement Intro(4/4) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 7
- 8. Method Experimental result Conclusion Data EngineeringLab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 8
- 9.
- 10. ■Eye image data Crop eye region from its localization of facial landmarks • Firstly, the subject’s face which always appears fully in the FOV ■ Using Viola-Jones method • Get Eye region ■ SDM(Supervised Descent Method) ■ Facial landmark detector ▪ Eye corner and other fiducial points ▪ Eye region are shown as red dots • “Face in the wild” datasets ■ Robust under natural light with different illumination conditions ■ Significantly fast and accurate for face align in the wild with large head rotary Method(2/7) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 10
- 11. ■Eye image data Cropped eye images without background • About 4% of all cases are discarded • Images dataset delivers eye images without background noise Method(3/7) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 11
- 12. ■Deep feature learning Task of CNN • Learning deep feature from the input eye images • Last hidden layer ■ Fully connected ■ 160 dimension deep feature is extracted Method(4/7) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 12
- 13. Method(5/7) Interaction Lab., KumohNational Institue of Technology 13
- 14. ■Random forest regression •𝑁 is calibration point number • 𝑥𝑖 is 𝑖𝑡ℎ deep feature vector in feature space • 𝑦𝑖 is 𝑖𝑡ℎ two-dimensional gaze vector Method(6/7) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 14
- 15. ■Random forest regression Method(7/7) InteractionLab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 15
- 16. Experimental result Conclusion Data EngineeringLab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 16
- 17. ■Dataset and experimentalsetup Desktop computer using USB camera • The image resolution is 640 by 480 Data • Collected different time ■ Under normal natural light, strong sun light, weak screen light at night • 22 groups of video from 6 subjects ■ Different light illumination conditions ■ 16 groups wearing glasses ■ Calibration step ■ Without head movement ■ Free head movement • Calibration points ■ 25 points is training ■ 16 points is test Experimental result(1/10)
- 18. ■Dataset and experimentalsetup Distribution of head pose angle in the free head movement • Using POSIT(Pose from Orthography and Scaling with Iterations) • Pitch : [0°, 15°], Yaw : [-10°, 10°] Mean grayscale intensity of images • Darker light condition has a lower mean grayscale intensity Experimental result(2/10) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 18
- 19. ■Deep gaze feature The deep CNN was implemented based on theano Experimental result(3/10) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 19
- 20. ■Comparison with othermethods MAE(Mean Absolute Error) • Gaze angle on different regression approaches and different features Experimental result(4/10) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 20
- 21. ■Comparison with othermethods Time cost(𝑚𝑠) • Single image testing ■ Feature extraction and feature regression Experimental result(5/10) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 21
- 22. ■Comparison with othermethods MAE(Mean Absolute Error) • Gaze angle estimation Experimental result(6/10) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 22
- 23. ■Comparison on illuminationcondition Gaze estimation under natural light • The red points and curves ■ Error of training data • The blue points and curves ■ Error of test data Experimental result(7/10) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 23
- 24. ■Comparison on testpoints MAE(Mean Absolute Error) • Gaze angle on test points using different calibration points Experimental result(8/10) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 24
- 25. ■Comparison on person-independent MAE(Mean Absolute Error) • Gaze angle for cross subject gaze estimation • Low resolution, free head movement and natural light Experimental result(9/10) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 25
- 26. ■Comparison on occlusion Experimentalresult(10/10) Interaction Lab., Kumoh National Institue of Technology 26
- 27. Conclusion Data Engineering Lab.,Kumoh National Institue of Technology 27
- 28. ■In this work CNN-based regression method for gaze estimation • Under natural light • CNN built a sparse active feature space from the training eye images • Gaze estimation model learned mapping between deep feature and gaze coordinate by random forest regression Deep feature significantly improves the performance Hope to apply • Real time driver gaze tracking • Gaze estimation in real driving environment with background noise Conclusion