Supporting Students’ 
Learning in an Open World: 
Mapping Current Practice to 
Open Practice 
Liz Masterman 
APT 2014: Connected Learning in an 
Open World, 8th July 2014 
CC BY Liz Masterman 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence. 
Except where indicated, all images are in the public domain.
Raising the level of research 
“Open education is not just about disseminating 
resources … but also about an opportunity 
toward broadening and deepening our collective 
understanding of teaching and learning.” 
(Iiyoshi & Kumar, 2008: p. 439)
Areas of focus 
• The fundamental principles of openness 
• Characteristics of open pedagogic models 
• The necessity (or otherwise) of new open 
pedagogic models
Fundamental principles of openness 
1. The world’s knowledge is 
a public good and all 
people should have free 
access to it. 
(after Geser, 2012) 
2. Open sharing of 
knowledge is at the heart 
of the academic process. 
(Lerman, Miyagawa & Margulies, 
2008)
The necessity of new pedagogic models in an 
open world (one view) 
“The pure usage of these open 
educational resources in a 
traditional closed and 
top-down, instructive, exam-focused 
learning environment 
is not open educational 
practice.” 
Open educational practices entail 
“social interaction, knowledge 
creation, peer-learning, and shared 
learning practices.” 
(Ehlers, 2011) 
CC BY-NC-SA University of Oxford
Open pedagogic models – 1 
a. The teacher’s role 
changes from source 
of knowledge to 
learning adviser. 
b. The student takes 
responsibility for 
their learning, 
including what they 
learn. 
CC BY-NC-SA University of Oxford
Open pedagogic models – 2 
Knowledge is co-constructed through 
mutual interaction and reflection 
between teacher 
and students. 
CC BY-NC-SA University of Oxford
Open pedagogic models – 3 
The development of 
knowledge and skills required 
for tackling and solving 
problems has priority over 
subject-centred knowledge 
transfer.
Open pedagogic models – 4 
Students learn primarily 
from each other, as a 
community. 
CC BY-NC-SA Jennifer Kontax via Flickr
Are new “open” pedagogies essential? Or… 
• …can we achieve the same pedagogic ends using “closed” 
content? (cf. Beetham et al., 2012) 
• …when designing for students’ learning, is it sufficient for 
teachers to recast/reimagine existing pedagogies? (cf. Weller, 
2011) 
• …can teachers simply “adopt those aspects of open 
practice that amplify their existing pedagogic practices 
most effectively”? (Beetham et al., 2012) 
• …can researchers employ existing theories as “conceptual 
tools” for understanding learning in an open world? (cf. Panke 
& Seifert, 2013) 
• …is the value of openness that teachers can “[rediscover] 
the specificity of their disciplinary pedagogy through a new 
lens … rather than discovering a new ‘open’ pedagogy”? 
(Beetham et al., 2012)
An antidote to Ehlers? 
“…an almost inevitable feature of people doing 
research in almost any corner of any discipline, 
as soon as we think we’ve come across 
something new we think a) it’s completely new 
and b) it’s going to transform the world, and 
both of them are usually incorrect. Usually what 
you are doing with something like this is putting 
refinement on an existing idea or pushing an 
idea forward a little bit” (project interviewee).
CC BY Liz Masterman 
* 
liz.masterman@it.ox.ac.uk 
" 
www.it.ox.ac.uk/eet 
@dotEliza 
@ltgoxford 
With acknowledgements to Dr Chris Davies (PI) 
Jennifer Allen, Steve Albury, and Jessica Chan (research assistants)
References 
Beetham et al. (2012): Beetham, H., Falconer, I., McGill, L. and Littlejohn, A. Open Practices: 
Briefing Paper. JISC. 
Ehlers, U.-D. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open 
educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2): 1–10. 
Geser, G. (2012). Open Educational Practices and Resources: OLCOS Roadmap 2012. Salzburg: 
Salzburg Research/EduMedia Group. 
Iiyoshi, T., & Kumar, M. S. V. (2008). Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of 
Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT 
Press. 
Lerman, S. R., Miyagawa, S. & Margulies, A. H. (2008). OpenCourseWare: Building a Culture of 
Sharing. In T. Iiyoshi & M. S. V. Kumar (eds.), Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement 
of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge (pp. 213–227). 
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 
Panke, S., & Seufert, T. (2013). What’s Educational about Open Educational Resources? Different 
Theoretical Lenses for Conceptualizing Learning with OER. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(2), 
116–134. 
Weller, M. (2011). The Digital Scholar: How Technology is Transforming Scholarly Practice. 
London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Supporting Students' Learning in an Open World

  • 1.
    Supporting Students’ Learningin an Open World: Mapping Current Practice to Open Practice Liz Masterman APT 2014: Connected Learning in an Open World, 8th July 2014 CC BY Liz Masterman This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence. Except where indicated, all images are in the public domain.
  • 2.
    Raising the levelof research “Open education is not just about disseminating resources … but also about an opportunity toward broadening and deepening our collective understanding of teaching and learning.” (Iiyoshi & Kumar, 2008: p. 439)
  • 3.
    Areas of focus • The fundamental principles of openness • Characteristics of open pedagogic models • The necessity (or otherwise) of new open pedagogic models
  • 4.
    Fundamental principles ofopenness 1. The world’s knowledge is a public good and all people should have free access to it. (after Geser, 2012) 2. Open sharing of knowledge is at the heart of the academic process. (Lerman, Miyagawa & Margulies, 2008)
  • 5.
    The necessity ofnew pedagogic models in an open world (one view) “The pure usage of these open educational resources in a traditional closed and top-down, instructive, exam-focused learning environment is not open educational practice.” Open educational practices entail “social interaction, knowledge creation, peer-learning, and shared learning practices.” (Ehlers, 2011) CC BY-NC-SA University of Oxford
  • 6.
    Open pedagogic models– 1 a. The teacher’s role changes from source of knowledge to learning adviser. b. The student takes responsibility for their learning, including what they learn. CC BY-NC-SA University of Oxford
  • 7.
    Open pedagogic models– 2 Knowledge is co-constructed through mutual interaction and reflection between teacher and students. CC BY-NC-SA University of Oxford
  • 8.
    Open pedagogic models– 3 The development of knowledge and skills required for tackling and solving problems has priority over subject-centred knowledge transfer.
  • 9.
    Open pedagogic models– 4 Students learn primarily from each other, as a community. CC BY-NC-SA Jennifer Kontax via Flickr
  • 10.
    Are new “open”pedagogies essential? Or… • …can we achieve the same pedagogic ends using “closed” content? (cf. Beetham et al., 2012) • …when designing for students’ learning, is it sufficient for teachers to recast/reimagine existing pedagogies? (cf. Weller, 2011) • …can teachers simply “adopt those aspects of open practice that amplify their existing pedagogic practices most effectively”? (Beetham et al., 2012) • …can researchers employ existing theories as “conceptual tools” for understanding learning in an open world? (cf. Panke & Seifert, 2013) • …is the value of openness that teachers can “[rediscover] the specificity of their disciplinary pedagogy through a new lens … rather than discovering a new ‘open’ pedagogy”? (Beetham et al., 2012)
  • 11.
    An antidote toEhlers? “…an almost inevitable feature of people doing research in almost any corner of any discipline, as soon as we think we’ve come across something new we think a) it’s completely new and b) it’s going to transform the world, and both of them are usually incorrect. Usually what you are doing with something like this is putting refinement on an existing idea or pushing an idea forward a little bit” (project interviewee).
  • 12.
    CC BY LizMasterman * [email protected] " www.it.ox.ac.uk/eet @dotEliza @ltgoxford With acknowledgements to Dr Chris Davies (PI) Jennifer Allen, Steve Albury, and Jessica Chan (research assistants)
  • 13.
    References Beetham etal. (2012): Beetham, H., Falconer, I., McGill, L. and Littlejohn, A. Open Practices: Briefing Paper. JISC. Ehlers, U.-D. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2): 1–10. Geser, G. (2012). Open Educational Practices and Resources: OLCOS Roadmap 2012. Salzburg: Salzburg Research/EduMedia Group. Iiyoshi, T., & Kumar, M. S. V. (2008). Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Lerman, S. R., Miyagawa, S. & Margulies, A. H. (2008). OpenCourseWare: Building a Culture of Sharing. In T. Iiyoshi & M. S. V. Kumar (eds.), Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge (pp. 213–227). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Panke, S., & Seufert, T. (2013). What’s Educational about Open Educational Resources? Different Theoretical Lenses for Conceptualizing Learning with OER. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(2), 116–134. Weller, M. (2011). The Digital Scholar: How Technology is Transforming Scholarly Practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Editor's Notes

  • #2 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
  • #5 Image is in public domain via Wikimedia Commons
  • #6 Top image: http://www.public-domain-image.com
  • #7 Top image is in public domain via Wikimedia Commons Bottom image is CC BY NC SA University of Oxford
  • #8 Image is CC BY NC SA University of Oxford
  • #9 Image by Milo Winter (1919) is in public domain via Wikimedia Commons.
  • #10 Bottom image: CC BY-NC-SA Jennifer Kontax via Flickr