MOOCs:
Summiting One Peak and Now Climbing Another
Jonathan Schaeffer
Dean of Faculty of Science
dscience@ualberta.ca
MOOC Reality
Whether you agree or disagree with the idea
behind MOOCs, they have already had one
enormous benefit:
When else has teaching received as much
attention?
Getting Into MOOCs
• The right reasons
– Explore new teaching/learning methods
– Be a research/teaching leader
– Build national/international reputation
– Showcase our research strengths
– Set a standard for quality
• The wrong reasons
– Make money
– Eliminate instructors
What We’ve Learned
• Resistance to Change
• Student Experience
• Low Completion Rates
• If You Build It, Will They Come?
• Quality Costs Money
• Production Not Core
1. Resistance to Change
• Changing status quo is hard!
• Doing it for the money
– false, at least for now; but is this bad?
• Online instruction can’t be as good as in-class
– false; can even be better
• MOOCs threaten the future of universities
– true, but only for those that do not adapt to change
• MOOCs will replace people
– some truth to this (but can be used to free time)
2. Student Experience
• One size does not fit all learners
– In-class UofA experience (regimented)
– Online UofA experience (flexible)
• Excellent student feedback for MOOCs
– Very high student evaluations
– Very high completion rates
– Flexibility appreciated
– Students at risk benefitted
3. Low Completion Rates
• Typically in the 4-7% range
– Used to argue MOOCs are poor teaching venues
• Are you surprised, given that the course is free
and that it requires many hours of work?
• Dino 101: 18% completion rate
• Charge a small fee and completion rates go
way up!
4. If You Build it They Will Come
• Getting harder to build a “best seller”
– >1,000 MOOCs available (many more coming)
– >15 million registered MOOC students (but now
growing slowly)
• 2014 and before
– One-of courses (#enrollments, 100s of 1000s, free)
• 2015 and going forward
– Specializations (#paying, 10s of 1000s, low cost)
5. Quality Costs Money
• Many low/poor quality MOOCs available
– Assume the student will simply listen for 50 minutes
– PowerPoint; Talking heads; Documentaries
• Must exploit the medium
– Multiple forms of media
– Interactive learning objects
– Filming (on location)
– Online assessment
– Social media
– This can be costly!
6. Production is not Core
• University mission is research and teaching,
not producing a MOOC
• Academic: pedagogy, instruction, and
assessment
• Non-academic: computing infrastructure,
filming, film editing, script editing,
illustrations, video production design, graphic
design software development, etc.
• Outsource non-academic component
Formula for Success
Pedagogy
+ Gamification
+ High-quality filming & editing production
+ Formative & summative assessment approaches
+ Online consumption/behavior strategy
+ Earned and viral media strategy
= New higher standard of rigorous university MOOC
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Academic
Onlea
• Not-for-profit University of
Alberta spin-off company
• Specializing in high-quality
digital learning productions
for university or industry
• Onlea.org
Trends (1)
• MOOCs can be “profitable”
– Revenue (small so far, but there is potential)
– Cost reductions (after investment cost)
– Professional development opportunities
• Move a large enrolment course online
– Reduced instructor, TA, and space needs
– Dino 101 reduces costs by over $100K/year
– Frees up professor time
Trends (2)
• There is a move to shorter courses
– Students prefer “mini-MOOCs”
– Equivalent of 4 weeks instead of 13
• There is a move to on-demand courses
– Take the course any time
– Self-directed learning
– Meet student needs, not institutional rules
Trends (3)
• Escaping the “not invented here” disease
• Use MOOC material from other institutions
– Use as part of a course (with permission)
– For credit (with permission)
• Partnering
– Multiple institutions banding together to develop
a joint course
– Challenge: can we do this?
Trends (4)
• Electronic textbooks
– The biggest disruption could be the overthrow of
the exploitation of publishing houses
• Use MOOCs as part of building comprehensive
online resources that replace textbooks?
– Assessment/practice is a challenge in some
domains
Coming Soon: New Courses
• Dino 201/2/3 (corner the market)
• Arctic 101, 201/2/3 (reputation)
• Software Product Management (revenue)
• Introductory courses in computing science,
physics, biology (new ideas in pedagogy)
Dino 101 App
• Entire course in a
phone application
• $9.99 US for the
course (no exams)
• Implications?
Where Is All This Going?
• Once technology disrupts a market, it is
relentless in making dramatic changes
• Disruptive change must happen… and soon
– Creating rich online learning experiences
– Offering courses from other institutions
– Changing the in-class experience
– Creation of virtual universities
• Exciting opportunities… for teaching and
research

Are MOOC's past their peak?

  • 1.
    MOOCs: Summiting One Peakand Now Climbing Another Jonathan Schaeffer Dean of Faculty of Science [email protected]
  • 2.
    MOOC Reality Whether youagree or disagree with the idea behind MOOCs, they have already had one enormous benefit: When else has teaching received as much attention?
  • 3.
    Getting Into MOOCs •The right reasons – Explore new teaching/learning methods – Be a research/teaching leader – Build national/international reputation – Showcase our research strengths – Set a standard for quality • The wrong reasons – Make money – Eliminate instructors
  • 4.
    What We’ve Learned •Resistance to Change • Student Experience • Low Completion Rates • If You Build It, Will They Come? • Quality Costs Money • Production Not Core
  • 5.
    1. Resistance toChange • Changing status quo is hard! • Doing it for the money – false, at least for now; but is this bad? • Online instruction can’t be as good as in-class – false; can even be better • MOOCs threaten the future of universities – true, but only for those that do not adapt to change • MOOCs will replace people – some truth to this (but can be used to free time)
  • 6.
    2. Student Experience •One size does not fit all learners – In-class UofA experience (regimented) – Online UofA experience (flexible) • Excellent student feedback for MOOCs – Very high student evaluations – Very high completion rates – Flexibility appreciated – Students at risk benefitted
  • 7.
    3. Low CompletionRates • Typically in the 4-7% range – Used to argue MOOCs are poor teaching venues • Are you surprised, given that the course is free and that it requires many hours of work? • Dino 101: 18% completion rate • Charge a small fee and completion rates go way up!
  • 8.
    4. If YouBuild it They Will Come • Getting harder to build a “best seller” – >1,000 MOOCs available (many more coming) – >15 million registered MOOC students (but now growing slowly) • 2014 and before – One-of courses (#enrollments, 100s of 1000s, free) • 2015 and going forward – Specializations (#paying, 10s of 1000s, low cost)
  • 9.
    5. Quality CostsMoney • Many low/poor quality MOOCs available – Assume the student will simply listen for 50 minutes – PowerPoint; Talking heads; Documentaries • Must exploit the medium – Multiple forms of media – Interactive learning objects – Filming (on location) – Online assessment – Social media – This can be costly!
  • 10.
    6. Production isnot Core • University mission is research and teaching, not producing a MOOC • Academic: pedagogy, instruction, and assessment • Non-academic: computing infrastructure, filming, film editing, script editing, illustrations, video production design, graphic design software development, etc. • Outsource non-academic component
  • 11.
    Formula for Success Pedagogy +Gamification + High-quality filming & editing production + Formative & summative assessment approaches + Online consumption/behavior strategy + Earned and viral media strategy = New higher standard of rigorous university MOOC P r o d u c t i o n Academic
  • 12.
    Onlea • Not-for-profit Universityof Alberta spin-off company • Specializing in high-quality digital learning productions for university or industry • Onlea.org
  • 13.
    Trends (1) • MOOCscan be “profitable” – Revenue (small so far, but there is potential) – Cost reductions (after investment cost) – Professional development opportunities • Move a large enrolment course online – Reduced instructor, TA, and space needs – Dino 101 reduces costs by over $100K/year – Frees up professor time
  • 14.
    Trends (2) • Thereis a move to shorter courses – Students prefer “mini-MOOCs” – Equivalent of 4 weeks instead of 13 • There is a move to on-demand courses – Take the course any time – Self-directed learning – Meet student needs, not institutional rules
  • 15.
    Trends (3) • Escapingthe “not invented here” disease • Use MOOC material from other institutions – Use as part of a course (with permission) – For credit (with permission) • Partnering – Multiple institutions banding together to develop a joint course – Challenge: can we do this?
  • 16.
    Trends (4) • Electronictextbooks – The biggest disruption could be the overthrow of the exploitation of publishing houses • Use MOOCs as part of building comprehensive online resources that replace textbooks? – Assessment/practice is a challenge in some domains
  • 17.
    Coming Soon: NewCourses • Dino 201/2/3 (corner the market) • Arctic 101, 201/2/3 (reputation) • Software Product Management (revenue) • Introductory courses in computing science, physics, biology (new ideas in pedagogy)
  • 18.
    Dino 101 App •Entire course in a phone application • $9.99 US for the course (no exams) • Implications?
  • 19.
    Where Is AllThis Going? • Once technology disrupts a market, it is relentless in making dramatic changes • Disruptive change must happen… and soon – Creating rich online learning experiences – Offering courses from other institutions – Changing the in-class experience – Creation of virtual universities • Exciting opportunities… for teaching and research