Innovations in Teaching Seminar IITS
2017Pedagogies of learning technologies:
how does technology create new possibilities for learning?
3 Oct 2017, Tuesday
Lecture Theatre 7 (NS1-02-03)
8.30am to 5.00pm
Organized by Centre for IT Services (CITS),
in collaboration with ‹
Teaching, Learning & Pedagogy Division
(TLPD).
Keynote Speaker
Mike KEPPELL
Pro Vice-Chancellor, Learning Transformation Swinburne
University of Technology
Assuring Best Practice in Learning and Teaching:
Priorities for Institutions, Teachers and Learners in a Connected World
Innovations in Teaching Seminar IITS 2017
Pedagogies of learning technologies:
how does technology create new possibilities for learning?
3 Oct 2017, Tuesday
Lecture Theatre 7 (NS1-02-03)
8.30am to 5.00pm
Organized by Centre for IT Services (CITS),
in collaboration with‹
Teaching, Learning & Pedagogy Division
(TLPD).
Keynote Speaker
Professor Mike KEPPELL
Former Pro Vice-Chancellor and Professor, Learning Transformations
Swinburne University of Technology
Assuring Best Practice in Learning and Teaching: Priorities for Institutions,
Teachers and Learners in a Connected World
Values
‱ ReïŹ‚ect the fundamental beliefs that underpin
everyday decisions and actions.
‱ Inclusive: promote equity
‱ Innovative: emerging ideas
‱ Transformative: thoughtful redesign
‱ Interdisciplinary: cross discipline
‱ Collaborative: collaboration
‱ Sustainable: generative strategies
‱ Connected: connected world
‱ Evidence-based: scholarship & research
‱ Open: opportunities of open education
Innovations in Teaching Seminar IITS
2017Pedagogies of learning technologies:
how does technology create new possibilities for learning?
3 Oct 2017, Tuesday
Lecture Theatre 7 (NS1-02-03)
8.30am to 5.00pm
Organized by Centre for IT Services (CITS),
in collaboration with ‹
Teaching, Learning & Pedagogy Division
(TLPD).
Keynote Speaker
Mike KEPPELL
Pro Vice-Chancellor, Learning Transformation Swinburne
University of Technology
Assuring Best Practice in Learning and Teaching:
Priorities for Institutions, Teachers and Learners in a Connected World
Preparing Students to Solve
the Problems of the Future
Overview
‱ How learning and teaching has changed in a
connected world
‱ Innovative teaching in a connected world
‱ Knowledge, skills and attitudes teachers
need to thrive in a connected world
‱ Knowledge, skills and attitudes learners
need to thrive in a connected world
‱ Active learning
‱ Learning spaces
‱ Central role of technology
How Learning and Teaching has
Changed in a Connected World
Active Learning
‱ Active learning places the student at the
centre of the learning process
‱ Engages the learner through authentic
learning, solving problems, working on
relevant projects and contributing to
their professional portfolio.
‱ Challenging and motivating projects focus
on meaningful tasks, real-world issues,
generative tasks, collaborative activities and
teachers as facilitators.
Active Learning
‱ Solving problems creates life-long learners
who graduate possessing the ability to
proactively shape their
environment
‱ The personalised learner collects
evidence, reïŹ‚ects on their learning, and
achieves learning outcomes that are
integrated into their professional portfolio.
‱ Active learners are designers who
create media-rich assessments that
exempliïŹes their 21st century skills
embodying their creativity, design thinking
and responsibility for their own learning.
Learning Spaces
‱ Physical, blended or virtual learning
environments that enhance learning
‱ Physical, blended or virtual ‘areas’ that
motivate a learner to learn
‱ Spaces where both teachers and
learners optimise the perceived and
actual affordances of the space
‱ Spaces that promote authentic
learning interactions (Keppell &
Riddle, 2012, 2013).
Principles of Learning Space
Design
‱ Comfort: a space which creates a
physical and mental sense of ease and well-
being
‱ Aesthetics: pleasure which includes the
recognition of symmetry, harmony,
simplicity and ïŹtness for purpose
‱ Flow: the state of mind felt by the learner
when totally involved in the learning
experience
Principles of Learning Space Design
‱ Equity: consideration of the needs of
cultural and physical differences
‱ Blending: a mixture of technological and
face-to-face pedagogical resources
‱ Affordances: the “action possibilities”
the learning environment provides the
users
‱ Repurposing: the potential for multiple
usage of a space (Souter, Riddle, Keppell,
2010)
Informal
Central Role of Technology
Innovative Teaching in a
Connected World
‱ Blended learning
‱ Authentic assessment
‱ Professional development
Blended Teaching and Learning
‱ Institutional blending: formal,
informal and virtual spaces
‱ Blended teaching: being aware of the
affordances of spaces and technologies
to optimise learning
‱ Blended learning:
‱ Active learning
‱ Interactive learning
‱ Networked learning
‱ Learner-generated content
‱ Authentic assessment
Formal
on-campus
teaching
spaces
Informal
on-campus
learning spaces
Online learning
and teaching
spacesBlended
Learning
On-Campus Learning and Teaching
Authentic Learning
‱ 
require students to complete complex
real-world tasks over a period of time
in collaboration with others as they would
in a real setting or workplace
(Herrington, 2006)
Authentic Assessment
‱ Empowering the learner by engaging them
in assessment tasks that simulate or engage
the learner in real-life situations.
‱ Engaging and worthy problems or
questions of importance, in which
students must use knowledge to fashion
performances effectively and creatively
(Wiggins, 1993, p. 229).
Professional Development
Knowledge, skills and attitudes
teachers need to thrive in a
connected world
‱ Digital ïŹ‚uency

‱ Seamless teaching

‱ Scholarship

‱ Learning analytics
Digital Fluency
‱ Teachers will need to focus on the
affordances of spaces and learning
technologies to be digitally ïŹ‚uent in a
connected world.
Seamless Teaching
‱ Continuity of learning across a combination
of locations, times, technologies or social
settings (Sharples, et al, 2012, 2013).
Scholarship
‱ Being informed by the literature
‱ Experimenting and collecting evidence
‱ Making your experimentation public
Learning Analytics and Surveys
Learning Analytics
‱ To beneïŹt retention by enabling the
identiïŹcation of disengaged and at risk students
‱ To identify the characteristics of successful
students
‱ To support the continuous improvement of
teaching
Surveys
‱ Using data to identify where an intervention is
needed e.g. undertake learning design with units
where student satisfaction is low.
‱ Follow-up surveys determine the success of the
intervention
TEQSA and QILT
Threshold Standards
‱ Student participation and attainment
‱ Learning environment
‱ Teaching e.g. programme design
‱ Research and research training
‱ Institutional quality assurance
‱ Governance and accountability
‱ Representation, information and
information management
Knowledge, skills and attitudes
students need to thrive in a
connected world
‱ Digital literacies
‱ Seamless learning
‱ Self-regulated learning
‱ Learning-oriented assessment
‱ Lifelong learning
‱ Flexible learning pathways
Personalised Learning
‱ The knowledge, skills and attitudes that
enable learning and act as a catalyst to
empower the learner to continue to learn
(Keppell, 2015)
‱ Learning pathways
‱ Professional portfolios (ePortfolios)
Knowledge, skills and Attitudes
‱ Knowledge is now co-created
‱ Skills form a basis for learning
‱ Attitudes inïŹ‚uence beliefs and behaviours
‱ Growth mindset (Dweck, 2006)
‱ Openly seek challenge
Digital Literacies
‱ Digital Competency
‱ knowing how to use digital tools
‱ Digital Fluency
‱ applying digital knowledge and skills
‱ Digital Design
‱ user-generated content
‱ ‘learner-as-designer’
Seamless Learning
‱ On-campus
‱ comfortable with formal and informal
spaces
‱ Virtual campus
‱ comfortable with blended, online, social
media
‱ Anywhere
‱ trains, cafes, teleworking
Self-regulated Learning
‱ Scaffolded learners
‱ teachers scaffold learning
‱ Strategic learners
‱ learners begin to manage their own
learning
‱ Autonomous learners
‱ learners become habitual learners
Learning-oriented Assessment
‱ Authentic assessment
‱ learners participate in authentic
assessment
‱ Negotiated assessment
‱ learners negotiate assessment with
teachers
‱ Self-assessment
‱ learners act on ‘feedback as feed-forward’
Learning-oriented Assessment
Assessment tasks as learning
tasks
Student involvement in
assessment processes
Forward-looking feedback
Lifelong Learning
‱ Encompasses both formal and
informal learning, self-motivated
learning.(Watson, 2003).
‱ Life-wide learning “contains many parallel
and interconnected journeys and
experiences
” (Jackson, 2010, p. 492).
Lifelong Learning
‱ Short-term
‱ learners are focussed on current courses
‱ Future-focussed
‱ relates courses to future job
‱ Being a learner
‱ learning becomes a customary practice
Flexible Learning Pathways
‱ Prescribed
‱ fixed learning pathway
‱ Flexible
‱ learner has some choice through
electives
‱ Open education
‱ learner constructs learning pathway to
meet their needs
Preparing Students to
Solve the Problems of
the Future
Institutional Priorities Teacher Priorities Learner Priorities
Focus on Problems and
projects
Digital ïŹ‚uency Digital literacies
Wider range of learning
spaces
Seamless teaching Seamless learning
Technology infrastructure Technology affordances Self-regulated learning
Student experience Authentic assessment Learning-oriented assessment
Modes (blended and online) Scholarship Lifelong and life wide learning
Fewer exams Learning analytics Flexible learning pathways
Further Links
LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mikekeppell
Slideshare:
http://www.slideshare.net/mkeppell
Website:
http://www.mikekeppell.com
Photography:
http://www.michaelkeppell.com
References
Carless, D. (2014). Exploring learning-oriented assessment
processes. Higher Education. DOI 10.1007/
s10734-014-9816-z.
Johnson, L.,Adams Becker, S., Estrada,V., Freeman,A. (2014).
NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition.
Austin,Texas:The New Media Consortium.http://
www.nmc.org/pdf/2014-nmc-horizon-report-he-
EN.pdf.
Keppell, M., & Riddle, M. (2013). Principles for design and
evaluation of learning spaces. In R. Luckin, S.
Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, J. Underwood,
& N.Winters (Eds.), Handbook of design in
educational technology (pp. 20-32). New York, NY:
Routledge.
Keppell, M.,Au, E., Ma,A. & Chan, C. (2006). Peer learning
and learning-oriented assessment in technology-
enhanced environments.Assessment and Evaluation in
Higher Education, 31(4), 453-464.
Keppell, M. & Carless, D. (2006). Learning-oriented
assessment:A technology-based case study.Assessment
in Education, 13(2), 153-165.
References
Keppell, M., Souter, K. & Riddle, M. (Eds.). (2012). Physical
and virtual learning spaces in higher education:
Concepts for the modern learning environment. IGI
Global, Hershey: New York. ISBN13: 9781609601140.
Keppell, M. & Riddle, M. (2012). Distributed learning places:
Physical, blended and virtual learning spaces in higher
education. (pp. 1-20). In Mike Keppell, Kay Souter &
Matthew Riddle (Eds.). (2011). Physical and virtual
learning spaces in higher education: Concepts for the
modern learning environment. Information Science
Publishing, Hershey.
Keppell, M.J. (2014). Personalised learning strategies for
higher education. In Kym Fraser (Ed.) The Future of
Learning and Teaching in Next Generation Learning
Spaces. International Perspectives on Higher
Education Research, Volume 12, 3-21. Copyright 2014
by Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Keppell, M.J. (2015). The learning future: Personalised
learning in an open world. In Curtis J. Bonk, Mimi
Miyoung Lee, Thomas C. Reeves, and Thomas H.
Reynolds. MOOCs and Open Education around the
World. Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
References
Sharples, M., McAndrew, P., Weller, M., Ferguson, R.,
FitzGerald, E., Hirst, T., & Gaved,M. (2013). Innovating
pedagogy 2013: Open University Innovation Report
Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Sharples, M., McAndrew, P., Weller, M., Ferguson, R.,
FitzGerald, E., Hirst, T., & Whitelock, D. (2012).
Innovating pedagogy 2012: Open University Innovation
Report 1. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Creative
commons. Retrieved from http://www.elearn space.org/
KnowingKnowledge_LowRes.pdf
Souter, K., Riddle, M., Sellers, W., & Keppell, M. (2011).
Final report: Spaces for knowledge generation. The
Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC).
Retrieved from http://documents.skgproject.com/skg-
ïŹnal-report.pdf
Wheeler, S. (2010). Digital literacies. Retrieved from
http://steve-wheeler.blogspot.com.au/2010/11/what-
digital-literacies.html?q=digital+literacies

Assuring Best Practice in Learning and Teaching: Priorities for Institutions, Teachers and Learners in a Connected World

  • 1.
    Innovations in TeachingSeminar IITS 2017Pedagogies of learning technologies: how does technology create new possibilities for learning? 3 Oct 2017, Tuesday Lecture Theatre 7 (NS1-02-03) 8.30am to 5.00pm Organized by Centre for IT Services (CITS), in collaboration with ‹ Teaching, Learning & Pedagogy Division (TLPD). Keynote Speaker Mike KEPPELL Pro Vice-Chancellor, Learning Transformation Swinburne University of Technology Assuring Best Practice in Learning and Teaching: Priorities for Institutions, Teachers and Learners in a Connected World Innovations in Teaching Seminar IITS 2017 Pedagogies of learning technologies: how does technology create new possibilities for learning? 3 Oct 2017, Tuesday Lecture Theatre 7 (NS1-02-03) 8.30am to 5.00pm Organized by Centre for IT Services (CITS), in collaboration with‹ Teaching, Learning & Pedagogy Division (TLPD). Keynote Speaker Professor Mike KEPPELL Former Pro Vice-Chancellor and Professor, Learning Transformations Swinburne University of Technology Assuring Best Practice in Learning and Teaching: Priorities for Institutions, Teachers and Learners in a Connected World
  • 2.
    Values ‱ ReïŹ‚ect thefundamental beliefs that underpin everyday decisions and actions. ‱ Inclusive: promote equity ‱ Innovative: emerging ideas ‱ Transformative: thoughtful redesign ‱ Interdisciplinary: cross discipline ‱ Collaborative: collaboration ‱ Sustainable: generative strategies ‱ Connected: connected world ‱ Evidence-based: scholarship & research ‱ Open: opportunities of open education
  • 3.
    Innovations in TeachingSeminar IITS 2017Pedagogies of learning technologies: how does technology create new possibilities for learning? 3 Oct 2017, Tuesday Lecture Theatre 7 (NS1-02-03) 8.30am to 5.00pm Organized by Centre for IT Services (CITS), in collaboration with ‹ Teaching, Learning & Pedagogy Division (TLPD). Keynote Speaker Mike KEPPELL Pro Vice-Chancellor, Learning Transformation Swinburne University of Technology Assuring Best Practice in Learning and Teaching: Priorities for Institutions, Teachers and Learners in a Connected World Preparing Students to Solve the Problems of the Future
  • 5.
    Overview ‱ How learningand teaching has changed in a connected world ‱ Innovative teaching in a connected world ‱ Knowledge, skills and attitudes teachers need to thrive in a connected world ‱ Knowledge, skills and attitudes learners need to thrive in a connected world
  • 6.
    ‱ Active learning ‱Learning spaces ‱ Central role of technology How Learning and Teaching has Changed in a Connected World
  • 7.
    Active Learning ‱ Activelearning places the student at the centre of the learning process ‱ Engages the learner through authentic learning, solving problems, working on relevant projects and contributing to their professional portfolio. ‱ Challenging and motivating projects focus on meaningful tasks, real-world issues, generative tasks, collaborative activities and teachers as facilitators.
  • 8.
    Active Learning ‱ Solvingproblems creates life-long learners who graduate possessing the ability to proactively shape their environment ‱ The personalised learner collects evidence, reïŹ‚ects on their learning, and achieves learning outcomes that are integrated into their professional portfolio. ‱ Active learners are designers who create media-rich assessments that exempliïŹes their 21st century skills embodying their creativity, design thinking and responsibility for their own learning.
  • 9.
    Learning Spaces ‱ Physical,blended or virtual learning environments that enhance learning ‱ Physical, blended or virtual ‘areas’ that motivate a learner to learn ‱ Spaces where both teachers and learners optimise the perceived and actual affordances of the space ‱ Spaces that promote authentic learning interactions (Keppell & Riddle, 2012, 2013).
  • 10.
    Principles of LearningSpace Design ‱ Comfort: a space which creates a physical and mental sense of ease and well- being ‱ Aesthetics: pleasure which includes the recognition of symmetry, harmony, simplicity and ïŹtness for purpose ‱ Flow: the state of mind felt by the learner when totally involved in the learning experience
  • 11.
    Principles of LearningSpace Design ‱ Equity: consideration of the needs of cultural and physical differences ‱ Blending: a mixture of technological and face-to-face pedagogical resources ‱ Affordances: the “action possibilities” the learning environment provides the users ‱ Repurposing: the potential for multiple usage of a space (Souter, Riddle, Keppell, 2010)
  • 15.
  • 16.
    Innovative Teaching ina Connected World ‱ Blended learning ‱ Authentic assessment ‱ Professional development
  • 17.
    Blended Teaching andLearning ‱ Institutional blending: formal, informal and virtual spaces ‱ Blended teaching: being aware of the affordances of spaces and technologies to optimise learning ‱ Blended learning: ‱ Active learning ‱ Interactive learning ‱ Networked learning ‱ Learner-generated content ‱ Authentic assessment
  • 18.
    Formal on-campus teaching spaces Informal on-campus learning spaces Online learning andteaching spacesBlended Learning On-Campus Learning and Teaching
  • 19.
    Authentic Learning ‱ 
requirestudents to complete complex real-world tasks over a period of time in collaboration with others as they would in a real setting or workplace (Herrington, 2006)
  • 20.
    Authentic Assessment ‱ Empoweringthe learner by engaging them in assessment tasks that simulate or engage the learner in real-life situations. ‱ Engaging and worthy problems or questions of importance, in which students must use knowledge to fashion performances effectively and creatively (Wiggins, 1993, p. 229).
  • 22.
  • 23.
    Knowledge, skills andattitudes teachers need to thrive in a connected world ‱ Digital ïŹ‚uency ‱ Seamless teaching ‱ Scholarship ‱ Learning analytics
  • 24.
    Digital Fluency ‱ Teacherswill need to focus on the affordances of spaces and learning technologies to be digitally ïŹ‚uent in a connected world.
  • 25.
    Seamless Teaching ‱ Continuityof learning across a combination of locations, times, technologies or social settings (Sharples, et al, 2012, 2013).
  • 26.
    Scholarship ‱ Being informedby the literature ‱ Experimenting and collecting evidence ‱ Making your experimentation public
  • 27.
    Learning Analytics andSurveys Learning Analytics ‱ To beneïŹt retention by enabling the identiïŹcation of disengaged and at risk students ‱ To identify the characteristics of successful students ‱ To support the continuous improvement of teaching Surveys ‱ Using data to identify where an intervention is needed e.g. undertake learning design with units where student satisfaction is low. ‱ Follow-up surveys determine the success of the intervention
  • 28.
    TEQSA and QILT ThresholdStandards ‱ Student participation and attainment ‱ Learning environment ‱ Teaching e.g. programme design ‱ Research and research training ‱ Institutional quality assurance ‱ Governance and accountability ‱ Representation, information and information management
  • 29.
    Knowledge, skills andattitudes students need to thrive in a connected world ‱ Digital literacies ‱ Seamless learning ‱ Self-regulated learning ‱ Learning-oriented assessment ‱ Lifelong learning ‱ Flexible learning pathways
  • 30.
    Personalised Learning ‱ Theknowledge, skills and attitudes that enable learning and act as a catalyst to empower the learner to continue to learn (Keppell, 2015) ‱ Learning pathways ‱ Professional portfolios (ePortfolios)
  • 31.
    Knowledge, skills andAttitudes ‱ Knowledge is now co-created ‱ Skills form a basis for learning ‱ Attitudes inïŹ‚uence beliefs and behaviours ‱ Growth mindset (Dweck, 2006) ‱ Openly seek challenge
  • 32.
    Digital Literacies ‱ DigitalCompetency ‱ knowing how to use digital tools ‱ Digital Fluency ‱ applying digital knowledge and skills ‱ Digital Design ‱ user-generated content ‱ ‘learner-as-designer’
  • 33.
    Seamless Learning ‱ On-campus ‱comfortable with formal and informal spaces ‱ Virtual campus ‱ comfortable with blended, online, social media ‱ Anywhere ‱ trains, cafes, teleworking
  • 34.
    Self-regulated Learning ‱ Scaffoldedlearners ‱ teachers scaffold learning ‱ Strategic learners ‱ learners begin to manage their own learning ‱ Autonomous learners ‱ learners become habitual learners
  • 35.
    Learning-oriented Assessment ‱ Authenticassessment ‱ learners participate in authentic assessment ‱ Negotiated assessment ‱ learners negotiate assessment with teachers ‱ Self-assessment ‱ learners act on ‘feedback as feed-forward’
  • 36.
    Learning-oriented Assessment Assessment tasksas learning tasks Student involvement in assessment processes Forward-looking feedback
  • 37.
    Lifelong Learning ‱ Encompassesboth formal and informal learning, self-motivated learning.(Watson, 2003). ‱ Life-wide learning “contains many parallel and interconnected journeys and experiences
” (Jackson, 2010, p. 492).
  • 38.
    Lifelong Learning ‱ Short-term ‱learners are focussed on current courses ‱ Future-focussed ‱ relates courses to future job ‱ Being a learner ‱ learning becomes a customary practice
  • 39.
    Flexible Learning Pathways ‱Prescribed ‱ fixed learning pathway ‱ Flexible ‱ learner has some choice through electives ‱ Open education ‱ learner constructs learning pathway to meet their needs
  • 40.
    Preparing Students to Solvethe Problems of the Future
  • 41.
    Institutional Priorities TeacherPriorities Learner Priorities Focus on Problems and projects Digital ïŹ‚uency Digital literacies Wider range of learning spaces Seamless teaching Seamless learning Technology infrastructure Technology affordances Self-regulated learning Student experience Authentic assessment Learning-oriented assessment Modes (blended and online) Scholarship Lifelong and life wide learning Fewer exams Learning analytics Flexible learning pathways
  • 42.
  • 43.
    References Carless, D. (2014).Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher Education. DOI 10.1007/ s10734-014-9816-z. Johnson, L.,Adams Becker, S., Estrada,V., Freeman,A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. Austin,Texas:The New Media Consortium.http:// www.nmc.org/pdf/2014-nmc-horizon-report-he- EN.pdf. Keppell, M., & Riddle, M. (2013). Principles for design and evaluation of learning spaces. In R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, J. Underwood, & N.Winters (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology (pp. 20-32). New York, NY: Routledge. Keppell, M.,Au, E., Ma,A. & Chan, C. (2006). Peer learning and learning-oriented assessment in technology- enhanced environments.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 453-464. Keppell, M. & Carless, D. (2006). Learning-oriented assessment:A technology-based case study.Assessment in Education, 13(2), 153-165.
  • 44.
    References Keppell, M., Souter,K. & Riddle, M. (Eds.). (2012). Physical and virtual learning spaces in higher education: Concepts for the modern learning environment. IGI Global, Hershey: New York. ISBN13: 9781609601140. Keppell, M. & Riddle, M. (2012). Distributed learning places: Physical, blended and virtual learning spaces in higher education. (pp. 1-20). In Mike Keppell, Kay Souter & Matthew Riddle (Eds.). (2011). Physical and virtual learning spaces in higher education: Concepts for the modern learning environment. Information Science Publishing, Hershey. Keppell, M.J. (2014). Personalised learning strategies for higher education. In Kym Fraser (Ed.) The Future of Learning and Teaching in Next Generation Learning Spaces. International Perspectives on Higher Education Research, Volume 12, 3-21. Copyright 2014 by Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Keppell, M.J. (2015). The learning future: Personalised learning in an open world. In Curtis J. Bonk, Mimi Miyoung Lee, Thomas C. Reeves, and Thomas H. Reynolds. MOOCs and Open Education around the World. Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
  • 45.
    References Sharples, M., McAndrew,P., Weller, M., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Hirst, T., & Gaved,M. (2013). Innovating pedagogy 2013: Open University Innovation Report Milton Keynes: The Open University. Sharples, M., McAndrew, P., Weller, M., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Hirst, T., & Whitelock, D. (2012). Innovating pedagogy 2012: Open University Innovation Report 1. Milton Keynes: The Open University. Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Creative commons. Retrieved from http://www.elearn space.org/ KnowingKnowledge_LowRes.pdf Souter, K., Riddle, M., Sellers, W., & Keppell, M. (2011). Final report: Spaces for knowledge generation. The Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC). Retrieved from http://documents.skgproject.com/skg- ïŹnal-report.pdf Wheeler, S. (2010). Digital literacies. Retrieved from http://steve-wheeler.blogspot.com.au/2010/11/what- digital-literacies.html?q=digital+literacies