This document discusses various categories of audit evidence and procedures for obtaining evidence, including inspection of records, observation, inquiry, confirmation, recalculation, reperformance, analytical procedures, and scanning. It provides details on each type of evidence, such as definitions, examples, limitations, and reliability. Reperformance is considered highly reliable because the auditor independently executes procedures. Analytical procedures are important for efficiency but reliability depends on factors like data quality. Scanning alone is unreliable and should be used with other procedures.
Introduction to audit procedures for obtaining audit evidence by Matt Lynch, Hanjo Mohr, and Kelsey White.
Overview of categories of audit evidence including inspection, observation, inquiry, confirmation, recalculation, reperformance, analytical procedures, and scanning.
Discusses inspection of records, reliability, direction of testing: vouching for occurrence and tracing for completeness.
Inspection of tangible assets through physical examination to confirm existence and identify obsolete items.
Observation as an audit procedure performed by others, its limitations including point-in-time reliability.
Questions prompting review of assertions related to observations and low reliability examples in audit evidence.
Inquiry process for gathering information from knowledgeable persons, emphasizing that inquiry alone is insufficient.
Confirmation involves obtaining verification from third parties to provide reliable evidence of assets.
Recalculation checks the accuracy of records and documents, including reconciliations viewed as reliable.
Questions exploring differences between inquiry and confirmation, and the reliability of recalculation.
Reperformance as an independent execution of controls, regarded as a highly reliable audit procedure.
Analytical procedures compare financial and non-financial data to evaluate plausible relationships, emphasizing their efficiency.
Scanning is a special analytical procedure to identify unusual items in accounting data, requiring experienced auditors.
Hierarchy of reliability for types of audit evidence presented in a table for clear understanding.
Questions addressing the importance of reperformance, analytical procedures, and the necessity of combining methods in audits.
Categories of EvidenceAU326.27-28Inspection of records or documentsAU 326.29Inspections of tangible assets AU 326.30Observation AU 326.31-36InquiryAU 326.37ConfirmationAU 326.38RecalculationAU 326.39ReperformanceAU 326.40-41Analytical ProceduresAU 326.42Scanning
3.
Inspection of Recordsor DocumentsInternal or external documents in paper form, electronic form, or other media formsTwo issues: Reliability of records or documentsInternal & external documents Relationship to specific assertions Occurrence and completeness assertionsDirection of testing
4.
Direction of TestingVouching– tests occurrenceSelecting item from journals then examining underlying source documentTracing – tests completenessSelecting source document and following it to the journals
5.
Inspection of TangibleAssetsPhysical examination Inspecting or counting tangible assetsProvides assurance of existence Identifies obsolete itemsObservationProcedures performed by others Processes that do not leave an audit trialEx: entities personnel & control activities Limitations: Point in time Unreliable
6.
QuestionsWhich primary assertionis satisfied when an auditor observes the client's physical count of inventory?What is an example of audit evidence with low reliability?Which audit evidence category makes up the bulk of the evidence gathered by the auditor?
7.
InquiryConsists of seekinginformation of knowledgeable persons throughout the entity or outside the entityHelps to identify the outside environmentAn inquiry alone does not provide sufficient audit evidenceCan be very informal
8.
ConfirmationThe process ofobtaining information directly from a third party Must be written requests from the third partyHelps provide reliable evidence of existing assetsExample: an auditor can send a confirmation to a consignee to verify that a client’s inventory has been cosigned
9.
RecalculationChecking the mathematicalaccuracy of documents or recordsMay use electronic file formsIncludes reconciling subsidiary ledgers and testing postings from the journal ledgersSince the auditor calculates this evidence it is viewed as reliable
10.
QuestionsWhat are somekey differences between inquiry and confirmation?Why is recalculation considered to be a highly reliable aspect of an audit?Why would the auditor do an inquiry if the information is not considered reliable?
11.
ReperformanceDefinition in AU326.39: “Reperformance is the auditor's independent execution of procedures or controls that were originally performed as part of the entity's internal control, either manually or through the use of CAATs*, …”Example:reperformingthe aging of accounts receivableHighly reliable audit procedure since the independent auditor creates the evidence * Computer –Assisted Audit Techniques
12.
Analytical ProceduresDefinition inSAS No. 56: “For the purposes of generally accepted auditing standards, the term analytical procedures means evaluations of financial information through analysis of plausible relationships among both financial and nonfinancial data.”Auditor compares special data with the financial data and attempts to gather evidence by examining the plausiblity of the resultsExamples: Comparing revenue and costs of materials of different financial yearsComparing personnel costs and the number of employees of different financial years
13.
Analytical ProceduresReliabilityof analyticalprocedures depends on:The availabilty andreliability ofthe data usedThe plausbility and predictability ofthe relationshipThe precision of the expectation and the rigor of the investigationOne of the most important audit proceduresOffers the possibility toretreive evidence without muchwork (efficiency)
14.
ScanningSpecial analytical procedure(AU 326.41)Review of accounting data to find significant or unusual items (manually or through use of CAATs)Review:AccountbalancesTransaction lists Subsidiary ledgersGeneral ledger control accountsAdjusting entriesSuspense accountsEtc.Scanning is unreliable; highly experiencedauditornecessary
15.
Reliability of the Types of EvidenceHierarchy of Reliability (table 4-6)
16.
QuestionsWhy is reperformanceespecially helpful to gather evidence?Why are analytical procedures important for the advanced audit? Whyshould scanning as an audit procedure beused in combinationwith other audit procedures?