Authentic academic quality
Reconciling organisational culture and external quality assurance
Authentic academic quality:
Reconciling organisational culture and
     external quality assurance.

Paper presented OECD IMHE General Conference
          17-19 September 2012, Paris

                                     Dr Dhaya Naidoo
                                Prof N Themba Mosia
EQA and organisational culture assumptions


          EQA
                         Improved
                            HE
                          quality
           OC
Traditional notions of organisational culture
• Homogenous, unitary and centred around shared
  values and could therefore easily be manipulated
  (usually from the top by management)

• An organisational culture that is amenable to change
  would be more receptive to the introduction of formal
  internal and external quality-assurance
  structures, systems and instruments,
Taken-for-granted assumptions of EQA
 • EQA unproblematic technology accepted without
   question by higher education institutions (HEI)
    • Premised upon the laudable aim of improving
      the quality of those institutions.
    • Motivated by a public-good rationale to
      improve the quality of those institutions
    • Multiple beneficiaries
    • Peer-driven, objective assessment of the
      institutions’ quality arrangements
Analysis

 • Philosophical, conceptual and methodological
   controversies and contestations surrounding both
   constructs

 • A three-dimensional model, Tierney (1988) cultural
   framework, modified cultures of the academy of
   Bergquist and Pawlak (2007) and adapted four
   sociological perspectives of Burrell and Morgan (1979)
   underpinned analysis
Emerging views of organisational culture

 • Multiple cultures exists simultaneously
    •   Managerial
    •   Collegial
    •   Political
    •   Transformational
 • Fluid membership
 • Driven by issues rather than demographic or
   occupational categories
Multiple roles of EQA

 • EQA as an agent of:
    • Control
    • Empowerment
    • Transformation
    • State
 • All four roles exist explicitly and tacitly
Organisational culture and external quality
                        assurance

                      Managerial
                       culture




                                        Transformative
Political Culture
                                            culture




                                                     Control
                    Collegial culture                Empowerment
                                                     Transformation
                                                     State
Conclusions
• Organisation cultures ephemeral than
  concrete, multidimensional than singular, characterised
  simultaneously by conflict, consensus and indifference and in
  a constant state of flux
• EQA multi-dimensional with several layers of stated and
  unstated intents despite being championed by a
  democratising and public-good rhetoric
• Fundamental and enduring change in higher education is
  largely contingent on the elevation of a transformative
  organisational culture and the transformation agenda of
  external quality assurance.
Authentic academic quality: Reconciling organisational culture and external quality assurance - Dhansagran Naidoo

Authentic academic quality: Reconciling organisational culture and external quality assurance - Dhansagran Naidoo

  • 1.
    Authentic academic quality Reconcilingorganisational culture and external quality assurance
  • 2.
    Authentic academic quality: Reconcilingorganisational culture and external quality assurance. Paper presented OECD IMHE General Conference 17-19 September 2012, Paris Dr Dhaya Naidoo Prof N Themba Mosia
  • 3.
    EQA and organisationalculture assumptions EQA Improved HE quality OC
  • 4.
    Traditional notions oforganisational culture • Homogenous, unitary and centred around shared values and could therefore easily be manipulated (usually from the top by management) • An organisational culture that is amenable to change would be more receptive to the introduction of formal internal and external quality-assurance structures, systems and instruments,
  • 5.
    Taken-for-granted assumptions ofEQA • EQA unproblematic technology accepted without question by higher education institutions (HEI) • Premised upon the laudable aim of improving the quality of those institutions. • Motivated by a public-good rationale to improve the quality of those institutions • Multiple beneficiaries • Peer-driven, objective assessment of the institutions’ quality arrangements
  • 6.
    Analysis • Philosophical,conceptual and methodological controversies and contestations surrounding both constructs • A three-dimensional model, Tierney (1988) cultural framework, modified cultures of the academy of Bergquist and Pawlak (2007) and adapted four sociological perspectives of Burrell and Morgan (1979) underpinned analysis
  • 7.
    Emerging views oforganisational culture • Multiple cultures exists simultaneously • Managerial • Collegial • Political • Transformational • Fluid membership • Driven by issues rather than demographic or occupational categories
  • 8.
    Multiple roles ofEQA • EQA as an agent of: • Control • Empowerment • Transformation • State • All four roles exist explicitly and tacitly
  • 9.
    Organisational culture andexternal quality assurance Managerial culture Transformative Political Culture culture Control Collegial culture Empowerment Transformation State
  • 10.
    Conclusions • Organisation culturesephemeral than concrete, multidimensional than singular, characterised simultaneously by conflict, consensus and indifference and in a constant state of flux • EQA multi-dimensional with several layers of stated and unstated intents despite being championed by a democratising and public-good rhetoric • Fundamental and enduring change in higher education is largely contingent on the elevation of a transformative organisational culture and the transformation agenda of external quality assurance.