2
Most read
3
Most read
5
Most read
BASICS OF
~MOLECULAR DOCKING~
SATARUPA DEB
ROLL- 10
Docking is a structure-based technique which attempts
to find the “best” match, between two molecules.
WHAT IS MOLECULAR DOCKING????
• In the field of molecular modeling, docking is a method which predicts
the preferred orientation of one molecule to a second when bound to
each other to form a stable complex.
• Knowledge of the preferred orientation in turn may be used to predict
the strength of association or binding affinity between two molecules
using for example scoring functions.
RECEPTOR LIGAND
LIGAND-RECEPTOR
COMPLEX
WHY IS DOCKING IMPORTANT?
 Signal Transduction :- The associations between biologically relevant molecules such
as proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, and lipids play a central role in signal
transduction. Furthermore, the relative orientation of the two interacting partners may
affect the type of signal produced (e.g., agonism vs antagonism). Therefore docking is
useful for predicting both the strength and type of signal produced.
Drug-Designing:- Docking is frequently used to predict the binding orientation
of small molecule drug candidates to their protein targets in order to in turn predict
the affinity and activity of the small molecule. Hence docking plays an important role in
the rational design of drugs.
Receptor or host or lock: The "receiving" molecule, most commonly a protein or other
biopolymer.
Ligand or guest or key: The complementary partner molecule which binds to the receptor.
Ligands are most often small molecules but could also be another biopolymer.
Docking: Computational simulation of a candidate ligand binding to a receptor.
Binding mode: The orientation of the ligand relative to the receptor as well as the
conformation of the ligand and receptor when bound to each other.
Pose : A candidate binding mode.
Scoring : The process of evaluating a particular pose by counting the number of favorable
intermolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic contacts.
Ranking : The process of classifying which ligands are most likely to interact favorably to a
particular receptor based on the predicted free-energy of binding.
DOCKING GLOSSARY
Basics Of Molecular Docking
DEFINITION OF THE PROBLEM
One can think of molecular docking as a problem of “lock-and-key”, in which one
wants to find the correct relative orientation of the “key” which will open up
the “lock” (where on the surface of the lock is the key hole, which direction to turn the
key after it is inserted, etc.)
 However, since both the ligand and the protein are flexible, a “hand-in-
glove” analogy is more appropriate than “lock-and-key”. During the course of the
docking process, the ligand and the protein adjust their conformation to achieve an
overall "best-fit" and this kind of conformational adjustment resulting in the overall
binding is referred to as "induced-fit“.
DOCKING APPROACHES
SHAPE COMPLEMENTARITY:- One approach uses a matching technique that
describes the protein and the ligand as complementary surfaces.
SIMULATION:- The second approach simulates the actual docking process in which
the ligand-protein pairwise interaction energies are calculated. Both approaches have
significant advantages as well as some limitations.
CALCULATE:-
Hydrophilic and hydrophobic
interactions.
Hydrogen bond donated.
Hydrogen bond accepted.
Ligand orientation with best
complementarity score.
Binding affinities.
Ionic interaction.
Aromatic Interaction.
Vander Waals’ forces
Electrostatic forces
Free energies.
STEPS OF DOCKING
Step 1: Start with Crystal Co-ordinates with target receptor.
For example,
-HIV-1 protease is the target receptor
- Aspartyl groups are its active sites
Step 2: Generate molecular surface for receptors.
Step 3: Generate spheres to fill the active site of the
receptor: The spheres become potential locations for ligand
atoms.
Step 4: Sphere centres are then matched with the
ligand atoms, to determine possible orientations for the
ligand.
Three scoring schemes:
o Shape scoring,
o Electrostatic scoring and
o Force-field scoring.
Step 5: Find the top scoring or the best ranking.
APPLICATIONS OF MOLECULAR DOCKING
Determination of the lowest free energy structures for the receptor-ligand
complex.
Calculate the differential binding of a ligand to two different macromolecular
receptors.
Study the geometry of a particular complex.
Propose modification of lead molecules to optimize potency or other properties.
De novo design for lead generation.
Library design.
Screening for the side effects that can be caused by interactions with other
molecules.
To check the specificity of the potential drug against homologous proteins
through docking.
Docking is also a widely used tool for predicting protein-protein interaction.
Knowledge of the molecular associations aid in understanding a variety of
pathways taking place in the living and in revealing of the possible pharmacological
targets.
Protein-ligand docking can also be used to predict pollutants that can be
degraded by enzymes.
COMMON SOFTWARES USED FOR DOCKING PURPOSE
1. UCSF DOCK- USA (1988)
2. AUTODOCK- USA (1990)
AutoDock is a suite of automated docking tools. It is designed to predict how small
molecules, such as substrates or drug candidates, bind to a receptor of known 3D
structure.
Current distributions of AutoDock consist of two generations of software: AutoDock 4
and AutoDock Vina.
3. FlexX- Germany (1996)
Receptor is treated as rigid.
Incremental construction algorithm:
Break Ligand up into rigid fragments
Dock fragments into pocket of receptor
Reassemble ligand from fragments.
Energy conformations
4. GOLD- UK (1995)
Performs automated docking with
full acyclic ligand flexibility, partial
cyclic ligand flexibility and partial
protein flexibility in and around
active site.
Scoring: includes H-bonding term,
pairwise dispersion potential
(hydrophobic interactions),
molecular and mechanics term for
internal energy
OTHER SOFTWARES
AADS- India (2011)
ADAM- Japan (1994)
BetaDock- South Korea (2011)
DARWIN- USA (2000)
DIVALI- USA (1995)
DockVision- Canada (1992)
EADock- Switzerland (2007)
Understanding the ruling principles whereby protein receptors recognize,
interact, and associate with molecular substrates and inhibitors is of
paramount importance in drug discovery efforts. Protein-ligand docking
aims to predict and rank the structure(s) arising from the association
between a given ligand and a target protein of known 3D structure. Despite
the breathtaking advances in the field over the last decades and the
widespread application of docking methods, several downsides still exist. In
particular, protein flexibility-a critical aspect for a thorough understanding
of the principles that guide ligand binding in proteins-is a major hurdle in
current protein-ligand docking efforts that needs to be more efficiently
accounted for. In this review the key concepts of protein-ligand docking
methods are outlined, with major emphasis being given to the general
strengths and weaknesses that presently characterize this methodology.
Despite the size of the field, the principal types of search algorithms and
scoring functions are reviewed and the most popular docking tools are
briefly depicted.
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
1. Lengauer T, Rarey M (1996). "Computational methods for biomolecular
docking". Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6 (3): 402–6. doi:10.1016/S0959-440X(96)80061-
3. PMID 8804827
2. Jorgensen WL (1991). "Rusting of the lock and key model for protein-ligand
binding".Science 254 (5034): 954–5. doi:10.1126/science.1719636. PMID 1719636
3. http://www.crcnetbase.com/doi/abs/10.1201/9781420028775.ch3
4. http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/Solutions/GoldSuite/Pages/GOLD.aspx
5. Wei BQ, Weaver LH, Ferrari AM, Matthews BW, Shoichet BK (2004). "Testing a
flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site". J. Mol. Biol. 337 (5):
1161–82.doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.015. PMID 15046985
6. http://autodock.scripps.edu/
7. http://www.ibms.kmu.edu.pk/sites/ibms.kmu.edu.pk/files/downloads/Dr.%20Abdu
l%20Wadood.pdf
Basics Of Molecular Docking

More Related Content

PPT
MOLECULAR DOCKING
PPTX
Docking Score Functions
PPTX
Molecular docking
PPTX
Molecular docking by harendra ...power point presentation
PPTX
Molecular docking
PPTX
Molecular Docking
PPTX
Molecular docking
MOLECULAR DOCKING
Docking Score Functions
Molecular docking
Molecular docking by harendra ...power point presentation
Molecular docking
Molecular Docking
Molecular docking

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Molecular modelling
PPTX
Virtual sreening
PPTX
De Novo Drug Design
PPTX
CoMFA CoMFA Comparative Molecular Field Analysis)
PPT
PPTX
Virtual screening techniques
PPTX
Energy minimization methods - Molecular Modeling
PPT
Protein-Ligand Docking
PPTX
docking
PPTX
De novo drug design
PPTX
Structure based and ligand based drug designing
PPTX
Structure based drug design
PDF
Lecture 4 ligand based drug design
PPTX
Denovo Drug Design
PPTX
threading and homology modelling methods
PDF
Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery
PPTX
Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR)
PPTX
COMPUTER AIDED DRUG DESIGN
PPT
Pharmacophore identification
PPTX
Conformational analysis
Molecular modelling
Virtual sreening
De Novo Drug Design
CoMFA CoMFA Comparative Molecular Field Analysis)
Virtual screening techniques
Energy minimization methods - Molecular Modeling
Protein-Ligand Docking
docking
De novo drug design
Structure based and ligand based drug designing
Structure based drug design
Lecture 4 ligand based drug design
Denovo Drug Design
threading and homology modelling methods
Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery
Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR)
COMPUTER AIDED DRUG DESIGN
Pharmacophore identification
Conformational analysis
Ad

Viewers also liked (10)

PPTX
Introduction to sequence alignment
PPT
Multiple sequence alignment
PDF
Molecular dynamics and Simulations
PDF
MD Simulation
PPTX
Molecular docking
PPT
Multiple alignment
PPT
Pairwise sequence alignment
PPT
Sequence Alignment In Bioinformatics
PPTX
Chemistry of amino acids
PPTX
Chemistry of amino acids
Introduction to sequence alignment
Multiple sequence alignment
Molecular dynamics and Simulations
MD Simulation
Molecular docking
Multiple alignment
Pairwise sequence alignment
Sequence Alignment In Bioinformatics
Chemistry of amino acids
Chemistry of amino acids
Ad

Similar to Basics Of Molecular Docking (20)

PPTX
MOLECULAR DOCKING.pptx
PPTX
Molecular docking.pptx
PPTX
MOLECULAR DOCKING PRINCIPAL OF DRUG DISCOVERY
PPTX
Molecular docking.pptx
PPTX
Molecular docking.pptx
PPTX
Docking Techniques in Medicinal Chemistry by Rishabh Tiwari.pptx
PPTX
Molecular docking.pptx
PPTX
MOLECULAR DOCKING IN DRUG DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT BY PRANAVI linkedin.pptx
PPTX
molecular docking team12_1RV22EC-079,096,098,122.pptx
PDF
Structural Bioinformatics.pdf
PPTX
molecular docking screnning. pptx
PPTX
molecular docking its types and de novo drug design and application and softw...
PPT
Pharmacophore Modeling and Docking Techniques.ppt
PDF
Molecular Docking ppt._Computer aided Drug Design
PDF
43_EMIJ-06-00212.pdf
PPT
P. Joshi SBDD and docking.ppt
PDF
Molecular docking and it application ...
PPTX
INTRODUCTION TO MLAECULAR DOCKING between two molecules
PPT
Structure based drug designing
PDF
MOLECULAR DOCKING- KOMAL SHANKAR MANDADE
MOLECULAR DOCKING.pptx
Molecular docking.pptx
MOLECULAR DOCKING PRINCIPAL OF DRUG DISCOVERY
Molecular docking.pptx
Molecular docking.pptx
Docking Techniques in Medicinal Chemistry by Rishabh Tiwari.pptx
Molecular docking.pptx
MOLECULAR DOCKING IN DRUG DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT BY PRANAVI linkedin.pptx
molecular docking team12_1RV22EC-079,096,098,122.pptx
Structural Bioinformatics.pdf
molecular docking screnning. pptx
molecular docking its types and de novo drug design and application and softw...
Pharmacophore Modeling and Docking Techniques.ppt
Molecular Docking ppt._Computer aided Drug Design
43_EMIJ-06-00212.pdf
P. Joshi SBDD and docking.ppt
Molecular docking and it application ...
INTRODUCTION TO MLAECULAR DOCKING between two molecules
Structure based drug designing
MOLECULAR DOCKING- KOMAL SHANKAR MANDADE

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
The Future of Telehealth: Engineering New Platforms for Care (www.kiu.ac.ug)
PPTX
Introduction of Plant Ecology and Diversity Conservation
PDF
CHEM - GOC general organic chemistry.ppt
PPTX
Neuro Ophthalmic diseases and their lesions
PPTX
diabetes and its complications nephropathy neuropathy
PDF
Telemedicine: Transforming Healthcare Delivery in Remote Areas (www.kiu.ac.ug)
PDF
Integrative Oncology: Merging Conventional and Alternative Approaches (www.k...
PPTX
Cells and Organs of the Immune System (Unit-2) - Majesh Sir.pptx
PDF
ECG Practice from Passmedicine for MRCP Part 2 2024.pdf
PDF
TOPIC-1-Introduction-to-Bioinformatics_for dummies
PPTX
BPharm_Hospital_Organization_Complete_PPT.pptx
PDF
Micro 4 New.ppt.pdf thesis main microbio
PPTX
Heart Lung Preparation_Pressure_Volume.pptx
PPTX
Thyroid disorders presentation for MBBS.pptx
PDF
Energy Giving Molecules bioenergetics again
PDF
No dilute core produced in simulations of giant impacts on to Jupiter
PDF
Cosmology using numerical relativity - what hapenned before big bang?
PPTX
Introduction to Immunology (Unit-1).pptx
PDF
Microplastics: Environmental Impact and Remediation Strategies
PDF
2024_PohleJellKlug_CambrianPlectronoceratidsAustralia.pdf
The Future of Telehealth: Engineering New Platforms for Care (www.kiu.ac.ug)
Introduction of Plant Ecology and Diversity Conservation
CHEM - GOC general organic chemistry.ppt
Neuro Ophthalmic diseases and their lesions
diabetes and its complications nephropathy neuropathy
Telemedicine: Transforming Healthcare Delivery in Remote Areas (www.kiu.ac.ug)
Integrative Oncology: Merging Conventional and Alternative Approaches (www.k...
Cells and Organs of the Immune System (Unit-2) - Majesh Sir.pptx
ECG Practice from Passmedicine for MRCP Part 2 2024.pdf
TOPIC-1-Introduction-to-Bioinformatics_for dummies
BPharm_Hospital_Organization_Complete_PPT.pptx
Micro 4 New.ppt.pdf thesis main microbio
Heart Lung Preparation_Pressure_Volume.pptx
Thyroid disorders presentation for MBBS.pptx
Energy Giving Molecules bioenergetics again
No dilute core produced in simulations of giant impacts on to Jupiter
Cosmology using numerical relativity - what hapenned before big bang?
Introduction to Immunology (Unit-1).pptx
Microplastics: Environmental Impact and Remediation Strategies
2024_PohleJellKlug_CambrianPlectronoceratidsAustralia.pdf

Basics Of Molecular Docking

  • 2. Docking is a structure-based technique which attempts to find the “best” match, between two molecules.
  • 3. WHAT IS MOLECULAR DOCKING???? • In the field of molecular modeling, docking is a method which predicts the preferred orientation of one molecule to a second when bound to each other to form a stable complex. • Knowledge of the preferred orientation in turn may be used to predict the strength of association or binding affinity between two molecules using for example scoring functions. RECEPTOR LIGAND LIGAND-RECEPTOR COMPLEX
  • 4. WHY IS DOCKING IMPORTANT?  Signal Transduction :- The associations between biologically relevant molecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, and lipids play a central role in signal transduction. Furthermore, the relative orientation of the two interacting partners may affect the type of signal produced (e.g., agonism vs antagonism). Therefore docking is useful for predicting both the strength and type of signal produced. Drug-Designing:- Docking is frequently used to predict the binding orientation of small molecule drug candidates to their protein targets in order to in turn predict the affinity and activity of the small molecule. Hence docking plays an important role in the rational design of drugs.
  • 5. Receptor or host or lock: The "receiving" molecule, most commonly a protein or other biopolymer. Ligand or guest or key: The complementary partner molecule which binds to the receptor. Ligands are most often small molecules but could also be another biopolymer. Docking: Computational simulation of a candidate ligand binding to a receptor. Binding mode: The orientation of the ligand relative to the receptor as well as the conformation of the ligand and receptor when bound to each other. Pose : A candidate binding mode. Scoring : The process of evaluating a particular pose by counting the number of favorable intermolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic contacts. Ranking : The process of classifying which ligands are most likely to interact favorably to a particular receptor based on the predicted free-energy of binding. DOCKING GLOSSARY
  • 7. DEFINITION OF THE PROBLEM One can think of molecular docking as a problem of “lock-and-key”, in which one wants to find the correct relative orientation of the “key” which will open up the “lock” (where on the surface of the lock is the key hole, which direction to turn the key after it is inserted, etc.)  However, since both the ligand and the protein are flexible, a “hand-in- glove” analogy is more appropriate than “lock-and-key”. During the course of the docking process, the ligand and the protein adjust their conformation to achieve an overall "best-fit" and this kind of conformational adjustment resulting in the overall binding is referred to as "induced-fit“.
  • 8. DOCKING APPROACHES SHAPE COMPLEMENTARITY:- One approach uses a matching technique that describes the protein and the ligand as complementary surfaces. SIMULATION:- The second approach simulates the actual docking process in which the ligand-protein pairwise interaction energies are calculated. Both approaches have significant advantages as well as some limitations. CALCULATE:- Hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions. Hydrogen bond donated. Hydrogen bond accepted. Ligand orientation with best complementarity score. Binding affinities. Ionic interaction. Aromatic Interaction. Vander Waals’ forces Electrostatic forces Free energies.
  • 9. STEPS OF DOCKING Step 1: Start with Crystal Co-ordinates with target receptor. For example, -HIV-1 protease is the target receptor - Aspartyl groups are its active sites
  • 10. Step 2: Generate molecular surface for receptors.
  • 11. Step 3: Generate spheres to fill the active site of the receptor: The spheres become potential locations for ligand atoms.
  • 12. Step 4: Sphere centres are then matched with the ligand atoms, to determine possible orientations for the ligand. Three scoring schemes: o Shape scoring, o Electrostatic scoring and o Force-field scoring. Step 5: Find the top scoring or the best ranking.
  • 13. APPLICATIONS OF MOLECULAR DOCKING Determination of the lowest free energy structures for the receptor-ligand complex. Calculate the differential binding of a ligand to two different macromolecular receptors. Study the geometry of a particular complex. Propose modification of lead molecules to optimize potency or other properties. De novo design for lead generation. Library design. Screening for the side effects that can be caused by interactions with other molecules. To check the specificity of the potential drug against homologous proteins through docking. Docking is also a widely used tool for predicting protein-protein interaction. Knowledge of the molecular associations aid in understanding a variety of pathways taking place in the living and in revealing of the possible pharmacological targets. Protein-ligand docking can also be used to predict pollutants that can be degraded by enzymes.
  • 14. COMMON SOFTWARES USED FOR DOCKING PURPOSE 1. UCSF DOCK- USA (1988)
  • 15. 2. AUTODOCK- USA (1990) AutoDock is a suite of automated docking tools. It is designed to predict how small molecules, such as substrates or drug candidates, bind to a receptor of known 3D structure. Current distributions of AutoDock consist of two generations of software: AutoDock 4 and AutoDock Vina.
  • 16. 3. FlexX- Germany (1996) Receptor is treated as rigid. Incremental construction algorithm: Break Ligand up into rigid fragments Dock fragments into pocket of receptor Reassemble ligand from fragments. Energy conformations
  • 17. 4. GOLD- UK (1995) Performs automated docking with full acyclic ligand flexibility, partial cyclic ligand flexibility and partial protein flexibility in and around active site. Scoring: includes H-bonding term, pairwise dispersion potential (hydrophobic interactions), molecular and mechanics term for internal energy
  • 18. OTHER SOFTWARES AADS- India (2011) ADAM- Japan (1994) BetaDock- South Korea (2011) DARWIN- USA (2000) DIVALI- USA (1995) DockVision- Canada (1992) EADock- Switzerland (2007)
  • 19. Understanding the ruling principles whereby protein receptors recognize, interact, and associate with molecular substrates and inhibitors is of paramount importance in drug discovery efforts. Protein-ligand docking aims to predict and rank the structure(s) arising from the association between a given ligand and a target protein of known 3D structure. Despite the breathtaking advances in the field over the last decades and the widespread application of docking methods, several downsides still exist. In particular, protein flexibility-a critical aspect for a thorough understanding of the principles that guide ligand binding in proteins-is a major hurdle in current protein-ligand docking efforts that needs to be more efficiently accounted for. In this review the key concepts of protein-ligand docking methods are outlined, with major emphasis being given to the general strengths and weaknesses that presently characterize this methodology. Despite the size of the field, the principal types of search algorithms and scoring functions are reviewed and the most popular docking tools are briefly depicted. CONCLUSION
  • 20. REFERENCES 1. Lengauer T, Rarey M (1996). "Computational methods for biomolecular docking". Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6 (3): 402–6. doi:10.1016/S0959-440X(96)80061- 3. PMID 8804827 2. Jorgensen WL (1991). "Rusting of the lock and key model for protein-ligand binding".Science 254 (5034): 954–5. doi:10.1126/science.1719636. PMID 1719636 3. http://www.crcnetbase.com/doi/abs/10.1201/9781420028775.ch3 4. http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/Solutions/GoldSuite/Pages/GOLD.aspx 5. Wei BQ, Weaver LH, Ferrari AM, Matthews BW, Shoichet BK (2004). "Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site". J. Mol. Biol. 337 (5): 1161–82.doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.015. PMID 15046985 6. http://autodock.scripps.edu/ 7. http://www.ibms.kmu.edu.pk/sites/ibms.kmu.edu.pk/files/downloads/Dr.%20Abdu l%20Wadood.pdf