Biglaw business development

4/17/2018 Biglaw Business Development: 7 Tips From Top Rainmakers | Above the Law
https://abovethelaw.com/2018/03/biglaw-business-development-7-tips-from-top-rainmakers/ 1/12
    
BIGLAW
Biglaw Business Development: 7 Tips From Top
Rainmakers
Prominent partners from ﬁve top law ﬁrms share the secrets of their success.
By DAVID LAT
Mar 15, 2018 at 12:18 PM
In a challenging environment for large law firms, where overall demand for Biglaw legal
services is flat or declining, business development matters more than ever. Last week, I
shared with you five business-development insights from chief marketing officers, courtesy
of All Star Business Development for Lawyers (2018), a superb program recently hosted by
the Practising Law Institute (PLI) and organized by Deborah Brightman
Farone and Katherine D’Urso (former CMO of Cravath and current chief client development
officer at WilmerHale, respectively).


One of the CMOs on the panel stressed the importance of getting buy-in from lawyers for
marketing efforts — and lamented the fact that some CMOs can’t get no respect from the
lawyers at their firms. This CMO recounted a conversation he had with a senior partner at a
prior firm, who told him, “I don’t even know why you’re here; I built my entire career
without you.”
It’s an unfortunate reality that, thanks to what Ron Friedmann has aptly labeled the “Biglaw
caste system,” practicing lawyers often feel they have nothing to learn from other
professionals at their firms, like CMOs. But these lawyers should respect and follow advice
from fellow lawyers — especially if those lawyers are some of Biglaw’s biggest and best
rainmakers, right?
The final panel at the PLI program, “Hitting Home Runs: The Rainmakers Speak,” featured
just that — a panel of partners who have generated millions of dollars in business for their
firms, year after year:
Brad Karp (moderator), chair of Paul, Weiss since 2008;
Candace K. Beinecke, senior partner and former chair of Hughes Hubbard & Reed (where
she became the first woman to lead a major New York law firm, in 1999);
Adam O. Emmerich, powerhouse M&A attorney and longtime partner at Wachtell Lipton;
Ralph C. Ferrara, partner at Proskauer and securities lawyer extraordinaire (former
general counsel of the Securities and Exchange Commission); and
Jeffrey S. Klein, leading sports lawyer and head of the employment litigation group at
Weil Gotshal.
The panel, expertly moderated by Brad Karp, felt like a delightful dinner party conversation
— lively, entertaining, and marked at times by disagreement. I distilled the discussion down
to seven key points.
1. Shape your business development efforts to reflect your personal style.
As Karp noted at the outset, business development is an art and not a science — and so, just
like a great artist, a great rainmaker will have her own distinctive style.
Take Candace Beinecke. As she once told the New York Times (and reiterated at the panel),
“Don’t wear someone else’s clothes if they don’t fit. I tried on several when I was starting out.

I looked at big, brash, bullying types and tried yelling and screaming…. I had no idea what I
was doing.”
But now she knows exactly what she’s doing — and has discovered that extroversion and
empathy are hallmarks of her own style.
“I love people and thinking about their issues,” Beinecke said. “Clients know I go to bed in
the evening and wake up in the morning thinking about their problems.”
2. The best business development tool is a happy client.
Over the years, Beinecke’s satisfied clients have garnered her so many more clients. Happy
clients can be excellent ambassadors for you and your firm — so don’t be afraid to enlist
their help in your business-development efforts, she said.
Adam Emmerich echoed these sentiments: “Happy clients remember and tell their friends.
Conversely, the worst thing to have is an unhappy client.”
How do you make (and keep) clients happy, and avoid making them unhappy? Make the
client look good — and avoid making the client look bad.
Sounds simple, right? But it’s actually more complicated than it might seem.
First, you need to figure out who is “the client.” Nowadays, thanks to what former GE
general counsel Ben W. Heineman Jr. has identified as The Inside Counsel Revolution
(affiliate link), the general counsel is a more powerful figure than ever at many companies —
and this GC will often intermediate the relationship between C-suite executives and outside
counsel (as opposed to outside counsel having a direct relationship with the CEO, which
used to be much more common).
Brad Karp shared a cautionary tale. After his firm won a huge victory for a client, an excited
partner shared the good news directly with the CEO and board of directors — who then
notified the general counsel of the win. The GC was presumably not thrilled with this chain
of communication — and did not retain the firm for future matters.
Second, you need to manage expectations. For example, don’t make the common mistake of
overpromising during a pitch, in an effort to land the business; the client will be especially

unhappy when you don’t achieve the promised result. As Karp put it, “Better to lose a pitch
than to win a pitch on false pretenses.”
The need to manage expectations continues into the client relationship. Candace Beinecke
described a situation where her firm, at around the same time, (a) lost an $8 million
litigation and (b) won motions in a class-action case that reduced the company’s potential
exposure from $4 billion to $100 million. Taken together, those were great results — but the
problem was that the head of the business unit inside the client on the $8 million case didn’t
feel that he had been warned adequately about the chance of the loss.
“What did I hear more about from the client? The $4 billion win, or the $8 million loss that
nobody was prepared for?”
3. Take a broad view of the attorney-client relationship.
What keeps clients happy? Yes, they want great results — wins in litigation, successful
transactions on the corporate side — but the lawyer-client relationship involves so much
more.
“I’ll help my clients with anything,” Beinecke said. This might involve helping a general
counsel find a certain medical specialist, or helping the CEO’s kid into a selective school. She
recalled handling one such request for a client and having an associate complain to her,
“This isn’t legal advice!” Her response, delivered from the other side of her partner’s desk:
“This is why I’m here — and how you could get here.”
The panelists had an interesting disagreement on whether the lawyer should see herself as
the client’s “friend.” Adam Emmerich took the “no” position, emphasizing the importance of
results: “You’re not their friend, you’re their lawyer.” (This might not be shocking coming
from a partner at Wachtell Lipton, which probably has more one-off clients than a typical
Biglaw firm — e.g., a company hiring Wachtell as it sells itself out of existence.)
Jeff Klein of Weil disagreed: “I do think clients want to like their lawyers.” Toward that end,
he spends significant time bonding with his clients — even if it means “going to sporting
events for teams I don’t like.”
(For the record, Adam Emmerich is all in favor of lawyer-client friendships. As he pointed
out, being someone’s lawyer “means having their back and getting the job done, whatever

the obstacles, whatever is required. You’re there to be of service. And succeeding in that -–
particularly in the tough, important matters that we all strive to be a part of — will surely
result in a friend for life.”)
4. Think about how to respond to the erosion of relationships.
Ralph Ferrara seemed to come down closer to Adam Emmerich’s side of the “lawyer/friend”
debate. In Ferrara’s view, “The world has changed — and relationships don’t mean as much
as they did 25 years ago.”
Instead, business development is more transactional. According to Ferrara, “Clients want to
know — what’s the last case you had just like mine, and what was the result?”
How are Ferrara and his colleagues at Proskauer responding to this new reality? They are
harnessing the power of artificial intelligence and using AI-driven tools and techniques to
alert them to financial, economic, and other conditions within a company that could give rise
to litigation. This allows them to proactively reach out to companies and offer their services
— even before any lawsuit has been filed.
When it comes to the world of Biglaw, according to Ferrara, “we are way behind in the use of
Big Data.”
5. Look for opportunities arising out of greater fluidity in the market for legal
talent.
Why do clients today have a more transactional mindset? As noted by Adam Emmerich, it’s
not necessarily a decline in personal loyalty; instead, it flows from several long-term trends,
including more lateral movement of partners within Biglaw, more lateral movement of in-
house lawyers, and changes in the nature of what corporate legal departments do.
These trends create opportunities as well as challenges, according to Emmerich and Karp.
For example, if a general counsel you’ve done great work for moves to a new company, then
you might be tapped for business by that GC. In this environment, it’s no longer the case that
the GC will send all of the company’s business to a single firm that has historically served as
outside counsel.
6. It’s all about teamwork.

Candace Beinecke told the story of how her firm successfully landed a new client. The client
had a new general counsel, and this GC scheduled “meet and greets” with several firms he
was thinking about retaining. Beinecke and some of her Hughes Hubbard colleagues met
with the prospective client, had a wonderful meeting, and later learned that the client would
be hiring them.
Good rainmakers should constantly be asking clients what their firms did right (and wrong),
and Beinecke did that here. The client said he was impressed by the collegiality and
teamwork that the Hughes Hubbard lawyers displayed during the initial meeting. In
contrast, for the team from one unsuccessful firm, a single senior partner did almost all of
the talking — and kept interrupting his colleagues whenever they tried to enter the
discussion.
Firm culture and compensation systems can enhance — or stymie — teamwork. The
panelists from firms with lockstep (or fairly close to lockstep) compensation schemes
emphasized how under their systems, partners have strong incentives to work together, help
each other, and cross-refer work.
In contrast, firms with more “eat what you kill” comp systems will often see partners
hoarding clients and fighting with each other for “origination credit.” At these firms, quipped
Karp, “There are elbow sharpeners on every floor.” Ferrara responded that if bounties are to
be paid, they should be paid to partners who introduce their clients to the practices of others
in their firm. Reward the gracious, not the pernicious.
Another key aspect of teamwork is grooming future team leaders — in other words,
mentorship. The panelists gave shout-outs to several of their mentors, including such
prominent figures as Ira Millstein, for Jeff Klein, and Judge Simon Rifkind and Arthur
Liman, for Brad Karp. (Judge Rifkind gave Karp this invaluable piece of advice: “Use the
word ‘we’ when talking to your client — it makes clients feel that their problems are your
problems.”)
Mentorship must be organic and not forced, according to Karp. He mentors junior
colleagues by including them in as many client interactions as possible, modeling good
behavior during those meetings and calls, and explaining why he did what he did afterwards.

Ralph Ferrara offered a refreshingly candid take on mentoring. Mentoring isn’t about heart-
to-heart conversations over long lunches; instead, it’s about “telling your people that they
need to develop a core competency, become an expert in some area of law, and display their
talents in the media — by publishing, publishing, publishing.”
In this day and age, when a general counsel is staffing her matters, she seeks expertise and
results. Relationships matter, but maybe not quite as much as they once did.
7. Don’t be afraid to say no to work.
This was one of the most interesting (and surprising) takeaways from a panel on business
development. Sometimes the best thing for a rainmaker to do is to turn down work.
Yes, you want to help your clients with as many of their legal problems as possible. And yes,
you want to cross-refer work to your colleagues, generating more business for your firm and
expanding the overall client relationship.
But the interests of the client must always come first — and sometimes this means declining
work.
Jeff Klein recalled pitching a colleague to a client for a high-stakes matter involving the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), a statute with notoriously large exposure for
companies. The client said to him, “You say you’re sure this person can handle my case. Are
you $20 million sure?”
“Clients appreciate it when you tell them that they would be better off with another firm for a
certain type of case,” Brad Karp said. “The credibility you gain from saying that is often
worth more than the value of the matter you just declined.”
At the end of the day, credibility is crucial — wisdom that it sometimes takes lawyers years to
realize.
“I loved law school,” Adam Emmerich said. “I haven’t had three happier years since.” (This
led Jeff Klein to quip, “I went to the wrong law school.” For the record, Emmerich went to U.
Chicago and Klein went to Columbia.)

    
“But life is not law school,” Emmerich continued. “Law school involves getting a task, doing
it well, getting the next task, and doing it well. But the real world is about so much more —
relationships, character, and thinking about things from another person’s perspective.”
Relationships, character, and empathy — a recipe for success not just in law, but in life.
All Star Business Development for Lawyers 2018 [Practising Law Institute]
Earlier:
Biglaw Business Development: 5 Insights From Chief Marketing Officers
The Biglaw ‘Caste System’ — An Impediment To Innovation?
David Lat is editor at large and founding editor of Above the Law, as well as
the author of Supreme Ambitions: A Novel. He previously worked as a federal
prosecutor in Newark, New Jersey; a litigation associate at Wachtell, Lipton,
Rosen & Katz; and a law clerk to Judge Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. You can connect with David on Twitter
(@DavidLat), LinkedIn, and Facebook, and you can reach him by email at
dlat@abovethelaw.com.
TOPICS
Adam Emmerich, Advice, Biglaw, Brad Karp, Brad S. Karp, Business development, Candace Beinecke, Conferences / Symposia, Jeffrey
Klein, Marketing, Partner Issues, Practising Law Institute (PLI), Rainmakers, Rainmaking, Ralph C. Ferrara, Ralph Ferrara

MARKETING/COMMUNICATION
Customers
Biglaw, Consumers, Corporations, Small
Law Firms, Solo Practitioners
MARKETING/COMMUNICATION
Customers
Biglaw, Small Law Firms,
Solo Practitioners
DOCUMENT REVIEW
Customers
Biglaw, Small Law Firms, Solo
Practitioners

EVOLVE THE LAW DIRECTORY
—ADVERTISEMENT—
Love ATL? Let's make it oﬃcial.
Sign up for our newsletter.
SPONSORED BY CONNATIX
ABOVE THE LAW - DAILY HIGHLIGHTS

Earn Back Time with
This Document
Automation Tool
THOMSON REUTERS
Starting A Non-Proﬁt
Organization? Here Are
Six Things To
Remember
LAWLINE CLE
Leap Into Any Task
THOMSON REUTERS
One Lawyer’s Guide to a
Better Law Firm Billing
Process
CLIO
3 Marketing Tips To
Grow Your Practice
THOMSON REUTERS
Law Firm Librarians
Taking On More in
Knowledge
Management
THOMSON REUTERS
Add Expertise Not
Headcount
THOMSON REUTERS
What Lawyers Can Learn
From Designers
CLIO
POPULAR ARTICLES
FROM THE ABOVE THE LAW NETWORK
Your email address
News (daily updates)
Bonus Alerts (real-time alerts)
Layoff Alerts (real-time alerts)
Partner Issues
Small Law Firms
In-House Counsel
Legal Technology
Law Schools
On the Job
ATL Careers
Subscribe
The 10 Worst Law
Schools In The
Country (2017)
An Argument For
Why Telling Students
To Treat Law School
Like A Job Is Bad
Advice
The Largest Law
Firm In The United
States
 

OUR SITES
NEWSLETTER SIGNUP
Subscribe and get breaking news, commentary, and opinions on law firms, lawyers, law schools, lawsuits,
judges, and more.
EDITORIAL STAFF
Managing Editor
David Lat
Editors
Staci Zaretsky
Joe Patrice
Breaking Media Editor at Large
Elie Mystal
Submit

Biglaw business development

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Biglaw business development (20)

More from Danny Crenshaw (11)

Recently uploaded (20)

Biglaw business development