Bone Tumors
Zarema Sulumova
Pediatric Bone “Tumors”
Benign
Osteochondroma
Osteoid Osteoma
Enchondroma
Chondroblastoma
Non-ossifying fibroma aka
benign cortical defect
Hemangioma
Eosinophilic granuloma
Osteomyelitis
Malignant
Osteosarcoma
Ewing sarcoma
Malignant fibrous
histiocytoma
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Eosinophilic granuloma
Malignant bone tumors
 Rare
 6% of all childhood malignancies
 Annual US Incidence in children < 20 yrs
 8.7 per million ~ 650 to 700 children/year
 For perspective, Annual US Incidence
 Overall 4697 per million
 Lung 610 per million
 Breast 633 per million
 Most often occur in young patients < 25 yrs
 Most common bone tumors ← will focus on these
 Osteosarcoma 56%
 Ewing sarcoma 34%
Osteosarcoma (OS)
 Primary malignant tumor of bone
 Derived from primitive bone forming
mesenchyme
 Malignant spindle cells produce immature
neoplastic bone matrix – osteoid
Can look heterogeneous under the microscope
Cell of origin?
Cell of origin may be mesenchymal stem cell
Osteoblastic Fibroblastic
Chondroblastic
Telangiectatic
Small Cell
Histologic subtype (WHO) OS
Central (medullary)
tumors
Conventional OS
(87%)
Osteoblastic – 50%
Chondroblastic – 25%
Fibroblastic – 25%
Telangiectatic (3%)
Small cell
Intraosseous well-
differentiated (1%)
Multifocal
Surface tumors
Parosteal (<5%)
Periosteal
High-grade surface OS
High grade vs. Low grade
Epidemiology OS
 Most common during 2nd decade
75% between 10 and 20 yrs
Peak during adolescent growth spurt
 Taller than average
 Occurs earlier in girls
 M:F 1.5:1
 African-American:Caucasian 1.4:1
Associations or Risk Factors OS
 Ionizing radiation
 Hereditary retinoblastoma (Rb mutations)
 Li-Fraumeni syndrome (p53 mutations)
 Rothmund-Thomson syndrome
 No environmental risk factors
 No consistent cytogenetic abnormality
Clinical presentation OS
 Pain: dull, aching, constant, worse at
night, often attributed to trauma
 Average duration of symptoms prior to
diagnosis is three months
 May or may not have a mass
 Diagnosis of pelvic lesions often delayed
 20% have detectable metastases at
diagnosis – most often (>90%) pulmonary
Location OS
Most common in long
bones
May have altered gait
or function
90% are metaphyseal
May cross growth
plate
Location:
#1 distal femur
#2 proximal tibia
#3 proximal humerus
Diagnostic Workup OS
History and physical
examination
Laboratory tests:
Blood tests: include LDH,
Alkaline phosphatase
Also CBC, liver/kidney
function tests
Pathology
Biopsy (open preferred)
Radiologic tests
Plain films of involved bone
MRI of entire involved bone
Whole body Bone Scan
CXR and CT of Chest
PET scan (in future)
Pre-therapy evaluation also
includes Audiogram,
echocardiogram, GFR/creatinine
clearance
Radiographs OS
Usually blastic
May be lytic or mixed
bone destruction and
production
Poorly marginated
Cortical destruction
Soft tissue ossification
Prognostic Factors OS
 Tumor Grade & Histology
 Parosteal favorable; telangiectatic unfavorable
 Disease Extent
 metastatic disease unfavorable
 Tumor Size / Site
 axial skeletal primaries unfavorable
 Age
 < 10 yrs unfavorable
 Response of the primary tumor to pre-operative
chemotherapy: very powerful predictor
 > 80-90% necrosis favorable
Treatment: Multimodal OS
 Surgery
control of bulk disease
 Chemotherapy
control of micrometastases
 Radiation
Tumors not very radiosensitive, so this usually
reserved for palliation
Treatment: Surgery OS
 Removal of all gross tumor with wide (>5cm)
margins en bloc and biopsy site through normal
tissue planes is required
 Type of surgical procedure depends on tumor
location, size, extramedullary extent, presence
of distant metastatic disease, age, skeletal
development, and life-style preference
 limb-sparing
 amputation
 Metastatic sites must also be resected
 If/when relapse occurs, retrieval therapy must
include resection
 Surgery alone 15-25% 5 year survival
Recurrence with local and (50%) metastatic
disease within 6 months of resection
 With multiagent chemotherapy  55-68%
No difference between adjuvant or
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Those with >90% tumor necrosis and
complete resection  80-85%
Treatment: Chemotherapy OS
 Bulky disease is considered somewhat
chemotherapy resistant
 Subclinical metastases are sensitive to
chemotherapy
 Most active agents include
 adriamycin, cisplatinum, high-dose methotrexate,
ifosfamide, etoposide
 Best # and schedule of chemotherapy unclear
 Role of intensification after local control unclear
 Immune modulators under study
 Role of adjuvant chemotherapy after
thoracotomy for recurrent disease unclear
Outcomes OS
 60-68% of patients with nonmetastatic
osteosarcoma of the extremity will survive
without recurrence and be cured
 20% of patients with metastatic disease
will be cured
 Therapy with curative intent is possible
following relapse: 10-20% of these
patients may achieve long term survival
Complications / Late effects of Therapy OS
 Surgical
Functional outcomes of limb salvage vs.
amputation under study
 Chemotherapy
Anthracycline induced cardiomyopathy
 may arise 15+ years after therapy
Cis-platinum induced ototoxicity and renal
toxicity
Ifosfamide induced renal tubular dysfunction
Ewing Sarcoma (EWS)
 Represents a family of tumors including
Ewing sarcoma of bone
extraosseous Ewing sarcoma and
peripheral neuroectodermal tumor (PNET)
of bone or soft tissue
 2nd most common bone tumor in children
Pathology EWS
One of many ‘small round
blue cell’ tumors seen in
pediatrics
Thought to be of neural
origin, derived from
post-ganglionic
parasympathetic primordial
cells
tumor cells synthesize
acetylcholine transferase
Small, Round, Blue Cell Tumor
Differential Diagnosis
Lymphoma/Leukemia
Rhabdomyosarcoma
Metastatic Carcinoma
Neuroblastoma
PNET/Ewing Sarcoma
Small Cell Osteosarcoma
Ewing
Tumor without
differentiation
PNET
Tumor with neural
differentiation
Incidence EWS
 Occurs most commonly in 2nd decade
80% occur between ages 5 and 25
Most common bone tumor in children < 10 yrs
~110 new cases/year < 15 yrs
~200 new cases/year < 20 yrs
 M:F 1.3:1 < 10 yrs
1.6:1 > 10 yrs
 Rare in African-Americans and Asians
Associations or Risk Factors EWS
 ???
 Consistent cytogenetic abnormality,
t(11;22)(q24;q12) present in 90-95%
 resultant fusion gene is EWS/FLI-1
 Also seen:
 t(21;22)(q22;q12)  5-10%
EWS/ERG
 t(7;22) and t(17;22)  the remainder
EWS/ETV1 and EWS/E1AF respectively
 t(1;16)(q21;q13)
present along with t(11;22)
Clinical Presentation EWS
 Pain & swelling of affected area
 May also have systemic symptoms:
 Fever
 Anemia
 Weight loss
 Elevated WBC & ESR
 Mean duration of symptoms 9 months
 20-25% present with metastatic disease
 Lungs (38%)
 Bone (31%)
 Bone Marrow (11%)
Location EWS
central axis (47%):
pelvis, chest wall,
spine, head & neck
extremities (53%)
#1 Femur
#2 Ilium
#3
Tibia/Fibula
Location EWS
Classical presentation is diaphyseal
Actually more common in metadiaphysis or metaphysis
Diagnostic Work-Up EWS
History and physical
examination
Laboratory tests:
CBC, liver/kidney function
tests, LDH, ESR
Urinalysis
Pathology
Bone marrow aspirate and
biopsy
Biopsy (open preferred)
Radiologic tests
Plain films of primary site
CT/MRI of primary site
CXR/CT of chest
Whole body bone scan
PET scan (in future)
Pre-therapy evaluation also
includes echocardiogram/EKG
Radiographs EWS
Destructive
Poorly Marginated
Permeative
Endosteal Cortical
Erosion
Layered periosteal
new bone
“Onion skinning”
Radiographs EWS
Radiology EWS
Large soft tissue mass
MRI necessary to
determine
Soft tissue extent
Intraosseous extent
Prognostic factors EWS
 Extent of disease
 Metastatic disease unfavorable
 Size of disease ???
 Primary site
 Pelvis least favorable
 Distal bones and ribs most favorable
 Age
 Younger (<10) more favorable
 Histologic ???
 Response to chemotherapy
 Neural differentiation
Treatment EWS
 Multidisciplinary approach must provide
both local control and systemic therapy
 Local control measures should not
compromise systemic therapy
When treatment fails, it is usually due to the
development of distant metastatic disease
Treatment: Multimodal EWS
 Surgery
local control where possible
 Radiation
local control where surgery not possible or
incomplete
 Chemotherapy
control of micrometastases
Treatment: Local Control EWS
 Surgery and/or Radiation therapy
 No randomized studies comparing surgery to
radiation therapy
 slightly more local recurrence when radiation used for
local control
 current suggestion for surgery where possible without
loss of function and without mutilation
 Combination therapy if incomplete resection
 Radiation doses usually 4500 – 5500 cGy
Surgical Indications EWS
 Expendable bone (fibula, rib, clavicle)
 Bone defect able to be reconstructed with
modest loss of function
 May consider amputation if considerable
growth remaining
 Trend toward improved outcomes with
chemo + surgery vs. XRT
Radiation therapy Indications EWS
 Unresectable without significant morbidity
 Pelvic lesions
 Spine lesions
 Lung metastases
 May consider chemo + XRT to allow for surgical
resection or add XRT if surgical margins positive
Treatment: Chemotherapy
 All patients require chemotherapy
 Active agents include
 Vincristine, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin,
dactinomycin,
ifosfamide, etoposide, topotecan, melphalan
 Effective chemotherapy has improved local
control rates achieved with radiation to 85-90%
 Role of SCT for high risk Ewing sarcoma still
under investigation
Outcomes
 Local Rx only  >80% distant failure
 Combination chemotherapy + local control
 55-75% EFS – localized tumors
 20-30% EFS – metastases present at diagnosis
 Patients with spine or paravertebral disease have a
slightly worse prognosis overall, as well as a higher
rate of local failure and tumor recurrence

Bone Cancer ONCOLOGY BONE CANCER IN THE ONCOLOGY

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Pediatric Bone “Tumors” Benign Osteochondroma OsteoidOsteoma Enchondroma Chondroblastoma Non-ossifying fibroma aka benign cortical defect Hemangioma Eosinophilic granuloma Osteomyelitis Malignant Osteosarcoma Ewing sarcoma Malignant fibrous histiocytoma Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Eosinophilic granuloma
  • 3.
    Malignant bone tumors Rare  6% of all childhood malignancies  Annual US Incidence in children < 20 yrs  8.7 per million ~ 650 to 700 children/year  For perspective, Annual US Incidence  Overall 4697 per million  Lung 610 per million  Breast 633 per million  Most often occur in young patients < 25 yrs  Most common bone tumors ← will focus on these  Osteosarcoma 56%  Ewing sarcoma 34%
  • 4.
    Osteosarcoma (OS)  Primarymalignant tumor of bone  Derived from primitive bone forming mesenchyme  Malignant spindle cells produce immature neoplastic bone matrix – osteoid Can look heterogeneous under the microscope Cell of origin?
  • 5.
    Cell of originmay be mesenchymal stem cell Osteoblastic Fibroblastic Chondroblastic Telangiectatic Small Cell
  • 6.
    Histologic subtype (WHO)OS Central (medullary) tumors Conventional OS (87%) Osteoblastic – 50% Chondroblastic – 25% Fibroblastic – 25% Telangiectatic (3%) Small cell Intraosseous well- differentiated (1%) Multifocal Surface tumors Parosteal (<5%) Periosteal High-grade surface OS High grade vs. Low grade
  • 7.
    Epidemiology OS  Mostcommon during 2nd decade 75% between 10 and 20 yrs Peak during adolescent growth spurt  Taller than average  Occurs earlier in girls  M:F 1.5:1  African-American:Caucasian 1.4:1
  • 8.
    Associations or RiskFactors OS  Ionizing radiation  Hereditary retinoblastoma (Rb mutations)  Li-Fraumeni syndrome (p53 mutations)  Rothmund-Thomson syndrome  No environmental risk factors  No consistent cytogenetic abnormality
  • 9.
    Clinical presentation OS Pain: dull, aching, constant, worse at night, often attributed to trauma  Average duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis is three months  May or may not have a mass  Diagnosis of pelvic lesions often delayed  20% have detectable metastases at diagnosis – most often (>90%) pulmonary
  • 10.
    Location OS Most commonin long bones May have altered gait or function 90% are metaphyseal May cross growth plate Location: #1 distal femur #2 proximal tibia #3 proximal humerus
  • 11.
    Diagnostic Workup OS Historyand physical examination Laboratory tests: Blood tests: include LDH, Alkaline phosphatase Also CBC, liver/kidney function tests Pathology Biopsy (open preferred) Radiologic tests Plain films of involved bone MRI of entire involved bone Whole body Bone Scan CXR and CT of Chest PET scan (in future) Pre-therapy evaluation also includes Audiogram, echocardiogram, GFR/creatinine clearance
  • 12.
    Radiographs OS Usually blastic Maybe lytic or mixed bone destruction and production Poorly marginated Cortical destruction Soft tissue ossification
  • 16.
    Prognostic Factors OS Tumor Grade & Histology  Parosteal favorable; telangiectatic unfavorable  Disease Extent  metastatic disease unfavorable  Tumor Size / Site  axial skeletal primaries unfavorable  Age  < 10 yrs unfavorable  Response of the primary tumor to pre-operative chemotherapy: very powerful predictor  > 80-90% necrosis favorable
  • 17.
    Treatment: Multimodal OS Surgery control of bulk disease  Chemotherapy control of micrometastases  Radiation Tumors not very radiosensitive, so this usually reserved for palliation
  • 18.
    Treatment: Surgery OS Removal of all gross tumor with wide (>5cm) margins en bloc and biopsy site through normal tissue planes is required  Type of surgical procedure depends on tumor location, size, extramedullary extent, presence of distant metastatic disease, age, skeletal development, and life-style preference  limb-sparing  amputation  Metastatic sites must also be resected  If/when relapse occurs, retrieval therapy must include resection
  • 19.
     Surgery alone15-25% 5 year survival Recurrence with local and (50%) metastatic disease within 6 months of resection  With multiagent chemotherapy  55-68% No difference between adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy Those with >90% tumor necrosis and complete resection  80-85%
  • 20.
    Treatment: Chemotherapy OS Bulky disease is considered somewhat chemotherapy resistant  Subclinical metastases are sensitive to chemotherapy  Most active agents include  adriamycin, cisplatinum, high-dose methotrexate, ifosfamide, etoposide  Best # and schedule of chemotherapy unclear  Role of intensification after local control unclear  Immune modulators under study  Role of adjuvant chemotherapy after thoracotomy for recurrent disease unclear
  • 21.
    Outcomes OS  60-68%of patients with nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity will survive without recurrence and be cured  20% of patients with metastatic disease will be cured  Therapy with curative intent is possible following relapse: 10-20% of these patients may achieve long term survival
  • 22.
    Complications / Lateeffects of Therapy OS  Surgical Functional outcomes of limb salvage vs. amputation under study  Chemotherapy Anthracycline induced cardiomyopathy  may arise 15+ years after therapy Cis-platinum induced ototoxicity and renal toxicity Ifosfamide induced renal tubular dysfunction
  • 23.
    Ewing Sarcoma (EWS) Represents a family of tumors including Ewing sarcoma of bone extraosseous Ewing sarcoma and peripheral neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) of bone or soft tissue  2nd most common bone tumor in children
  • 24.
    Pathology EWS One ofmany ‘small round blue cell’ tumors seen in pediatrics Thought to be of neural origin, derived from post-ganglionic parasympathetic primordial cells tumor cells synthesize acetylcholine transferase
  • 25.
    Small, Round, BlueCell Tumor Differential Diagnosis Lymphoma/Leukemia Rhabdomyosarcoma Metastatic Carcinoma Neuroblastoma PNET/Ewing Sarcoma Small Cell Osteosarcoma Ewing Tumor without differentiation PNET Tumor with neural differentiation
  • 26.
    Incidence EWS  Occursmost commonly in 2nd decade 80% occur between ages 5 and 25 Most common bone tumor in children < 10 yrs ~110 new cases/year < 15 yrs ~200 new cases/year < 20 yrs  M:F 1.3:1 < 10 yrs 1.6:1 > 10 yrs  Rare in African-Americans and Asians
  • 27.
    Associations or RiskFactors EWS  ???  Consistent cytogenetic abnormality, t(11;22)(q24;q12) present in 90-95%  resultant fusion gene is EWS/FLI-1  Also seen:  t(21;22)(q22;q12)  5-10% EWS/ERG  t(7;22) and t(17;22)  the remainder EWS/ETV1 and EWS/E1AF respectively  t(1;16)(q21;q13) present along with t(11;22)
  • 28.
    Clinical Presentation EWS Pain & swelling of affected area  May also have systemic symptoms:  Fever  Anemia  Weight loss  Elevated WBC & ESR  Mean duration of symptoms 9 months  20-25% present with metastatic disease  Lungs (38%)  Bone (31%)  Bone Marrow (11%)
  • 29.
    Location EWS central axis(47%): pelvis, chest wall, spine, head & neck extremities (53%) #1 Femur #2 Ilium #3 Tibia/Fibula
  • 30.
    Location EWS Classical presentationis diaphyseal Actually more common in metadiaphysis or metaphysis
  • 31.
    Diagnostic Work-Up EWS Historyand physical examination Laboratory tests: CBC, liver/kidney function tests, LDH, ESR Urinalysis Pathology Bone marrow aspirate and biopsy Biopsy (open preferred) Radiologic tests Plain films of primary site CT/MRI of primary site CXR/CT of chest Whole body bone scan PET scan (in future) Pre-therapy evaluation also includes echocardiogram/EKG
  • 32.
    Radiographs EWS Destructive Poorly Marginated Permeative EndostealCortical Erosion Layered periosteal new bone “Onion skinning”
  • 33.
  • 34.
    Radiology EWS Large softtissue mass MRI necessary to determine Soft tissue extent Intraosseous extent
  • 35.
    Prognostic factors EWS Extent of disease  Metastatic disease unfavorable  Size of disease ???  Primary site  Pelvis least favorable  Distal bones and ribs most favorable  Age  Younger (<10) more favorable  Histologic ???  Response to chemotherapy  Neural differentiation
  • 36.
    Treatment EWS  Multidisciplinaryapproach must provide both local control and systemic therapy  Local control measures should not compromise systemic therapy When treatment fails, it is usually due to the development of distant metastatic disease
  • 37.
    Treatment: Multimodal EWS Surgery local control where possible  Radiation local control where surgery not possible or incomplete  Chemotherapy control of micrometastases
  • 38.
    Treatment: Local ControlEWS  Surgery and/or Radiation therapy  No randomized studies comparing surgery to radiation therapy  slightly more local recurrence when radiation used for local control  current suggestion for surgery where possible without loss of function and without mutilation  Combination therapy if incomplete resection  Radiation doses usually 4500 – 5500 cGy
  • 39.
    Surgical Indications EWS Expendable bone (fibula, rib, clavicle)  Bone defect able to be reconstructed with modest loss of function  May consider amputation if considerable growth remaining  Trend toward improved outcomes with chemo + surgery vs. XRT
  • 40.
    Radiation therapy IndicationsEWS  Unresectable without significant morbidity  Pelvic lesions  Spine lesions  Lung metastases  May consider chemo + XRT to allow for surgical resection or add XRT if surgical margins positive
  • 41.
    Treatment: Chemotherapy  Allpatients require chemotherapy  Active agents include  Vincristine, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, dactinomycin, ifosfamide, etoposide, topotecan, melphalan  Effective chemotherapy has improved local control rates achieved with radiation to 85-90%  Role of SCT for high risk Ewing sarcoma still under investigation
  • 42.
    Outcomes  Local Rxonly  >80% distant failure  Combination chemotherapy + local control  55-75% EFS – localized tumors  20-30% EFS – metastases present at diagnosis  Patients with spine or paravertebral disease have a slightly worse prognosis overall, as well as a higher rate of local failure and tumor recurrence