Transfer Pricing
Advanced Management Accounting: Chapter 6
Learning
Objectives
Basic Concepts in Transfer
Pricing
Methods of Transfer Pricing
2
Definition
A transfer price is the price
charged when one segment
of a company provides
goods or services to
another segment of the
company.
The fundamental objective
in setting transfer prices is
to motivate managers to
act in the best interests of
the overall company.
Transfer Pricing
The amount charged when one division sells
goods or services to another division
Battery Division Auto Division
Batteries
Concep
t
Several divisions in an organisation
Performance of each division measured in terms of profit
Manager of the division responsible for its performance/
profits
When goods are transferred, income of the supplying division is
the cost of the receiving division
Thus Transfer price fixed will affect the profitability of both
divisions
4
Objective
s
Emphasis
on
Profits
Maximum
Utilisation of
plant
capacity
Optimise
allocation
of
financial
resources
5
Methods of Transfer
Pricing
Pricing at bargained or negotiated
price
Pricing at Market
Price
Pricing at Cost or variants of cost
method
Actual
Manufacturing
Cost
Standard Cost Full Cost Full Cost + Markup
6
Various
Methods
I. Pricing at
Cost
7
Actual Manufacturing
Cost
8
Goods or services are transferred at their actual
cost of production
Useful for those units where the responsibility of
profit performance is centralised
Difficult to measure the performance of each
profit centre
Standard
Cost
Transfers of goods and services are made at their standard cost
Any difference between actual and standard cost viz., variances
are usually absorbed by the supplying unit. Occasionally,
variances are transferred to the user unit
This will result in the inventory being carried at identical standard
cost by both the supplying and receiving units
Here also the profit performance responsibility is centralised and
thus it cannot be measured for individual units involved
9
Full Cost
Pricing
Full cost means cost of production plus expenses like
selling and distribution, administration, research and
development cost etc
In this method, the supplying unit is not allowed to make
any profit on transfers to other units. But it is free to
earn profit on outside sale
One good thing about this method is that the supplying
unit is allowed to recover the full cost of the
goods/services transferred
10
Full Cost + Markup
Pricing
Supplying unit transfers goods and services at full cost plus some mark-up
The markup added to full cost is either expressed as a percentage of full cost
or of capital employed
Selling expenses here are recovered by the supplying unit without incurring
them, especially when the goods/services are transferred internally
Due to this defect the use of full cost plus method is not appreciated by the
internal receiving units
To overcome this defect either the use of standard cost plus or actual cost
plus are preferred
Use of either of the preceding method facilitates the task of measuring
profit performance and efficiency of the units involved
11
An
Introduction.
II. Pricing at Market
Price
12
Objectiv
e
Transfer prices of
goods/services
transferred to other
units/divisions are
based on market
prices
In a competitive
market
goods/services
cannot be
transferred to its
users at a higher
price.
Such a competitive
market provides
an incentive to
efficient
production
Since market prices
will, by and large be
determined by
demand and supply in
the long run, it is
claimed that profits
which results under
this method, will
provide a good
indicator of the
overall efficiency of
the various units
Competitive market
prices provide
reliable measures of
divisional income
because these prices
are established
independently rather
than by individuals
who have an interest
in the results
13
Market Pricing -
Limitations
Difficulty in obtaining market
prices
Difficulty in determining the elements
of selling and distribution expenses
such as commission, discounts,
advertisement and sales promotion
etc., so that necessary adjustment may
be made in the market price to provide
benefit of these expenses, to the profit
centre, receiving the goods.
14
III. Pricing at Bargained
Price
23
Methodolog
y
Under this method each decentralised unit is considered as an independent
unit and such units decide the transfer price by negotiations or bargaining
Divisional managers have full freedom to purchase their requirement
from outside if the prices quoted by the outside party is lower
A system of negotiated prices develops business like attitude
amongst divisions of the company
To avoid any reduction in overall profits of the company, top management
may impose restriction on the external purchase/sale of goods
24
Intra-Company
Transfer
In order to have an effective system of intra-company
transfer pricing the following points should be kept in
view:
Prices of all transfers in and out of a profit
centre should be determined by negotiation
between the buyer and the seller
Negotiations should have access to full data on
alternative sources and markets and to public
and private information about market prices
Buyers and sellers should be completely free to
deal outside the company
25
Illustration
3
33
Problem
Statement
34
Products X Y Z
Rs. Rs. Rs.
External mkt price p.u. 48 46 40
Variable cost of prodn in Divn A 33 24 28
Labour hrs reqd p.u. in divn A 3 4 2
 Division A is a profit centre which produces three
products X, Y and Z. Each product has an external
market.
Problem
Statement
What should the transfer price be for each unit for 300 units of Y, if the total labour
hours
available in Division A are:
3,800 hours 5,600 hours
Instead of receiving transfers of product Y from Division A, Division B could buy
similar product in the open market at slightly cheaper price of Rs. 45
p.u.
The maximum external sales
are:
X: 800 units; Y: 500 units; Z: 300 units
Product Y can be transferred to Division B, but the maximum quantity that
might be required for transfer is 300 units of Y.
35
Solution: (i) Hours required
to meet maximum demand
36
External sales Hours reqd p.u. Total Hrs
(i) (ii) (iii)=(i) x (ii)
X 800 units 3 2,400
Y 500 units 4 2,000
Z 300 units 2 600
Total 5,000
Contribution Per
Unit
37
Product X Y Z
Rs. Rs. Rs.
Selling Price 48 46 40
Less: Variable cost 33 24 28
Contribution p.u. (A) 15 22 12
Labour hrs reqd p.u.(B) 3 4 2
Contb p. hr (A)/ (B) 5 5.5 6
Ranking III II I
3,800
Hours
(a) If only 3,800 hours are available in Division A:
300 units of Z (maximum), which will
take 500 units of Y (maximum), which
will take 400 units of X to use
remaining hrs.
 600 hrs.
2,000 hrs.
1,200 hrs.
3,800 hrs.


Transfer price
 (i) Variable cost of
Y
24.00
Opportunity cost
 (ii) Contribution relating to ‘X’ forgone for
producing additional units of Y (4 hrs × Rs. 5*) 20.00
44.00
*Y takes 4 hours and in each hour production of X would have generated contribution of
Rs. 5.
38
5,600
Hours
(b) If 5,600 hours are available
 Maximum time required to meet external sales
(Refer to Working note 1)
 Hours now available
 It means 600 hrs can be easily used for the production of Y and
transfer price will be variable cost only i.e. (600 hrs. ÷ 4 hrs) × Rs.
24
Note: Y takes 4 hours per unit
5,000
hrs.
5,600
hrs.
Rs. 3,600
 For producing additional 150 units, production of X will be
disturbed.
Variable costs
 (i) 150 units of X @ Rs. 24
Opportunity cost
Rs. 3,600
 (ii) Contribution of ‘X’ units forgone (600 hrs. × Rs. 5) Rs. 3,000* 6,600
 Total price for 300 units 10,200
 Thus, Average transfer price should be Rs. 34 per unit
*Contribution per hr. of X foregone
39
Division and Company
Conflict
40
Conflict
s
Where profitability is used as a criteria for evaluating the
performance of each division, conflict arises between a division
of the company and company as a whole
Under decentralisation it is expected that the top management
should not interfere with the decision making process of its
subordinates heading different units
The management of such companies also expects that each
division should not only achieve its own objective necessary for
evaluating the performance but should also achieve the objective
of goal congruence.
41
Conflict
s
If a division fails to achieve the objective of ‘goal congruence’
the management of the company may dictate their ‘transfer
price’
Such interference of management of the company is usually the
main basis of conflict between a division and the company as a
whole
Conflict is aggravated if management advocates transfer of goods
and services at cost
The profitability of the transferring division will not be known
by the use of such a transfer price
42
Multinational Transfer
Pricing
43
Multinational transfer
pricing
Multinational
companies may use
transfer prices to
minimize worldwide
income taxes, import
duties, and tariffs.
For example, an MNC
might prefer to make its
profits in a country,
where maximum
corporate tax rate is
28%, rather than in
some other place where
the rate is 35%
44
Multinational transfer
pricing
Suppose a division in a high-income-tax-rate country
produces a sub-assembly for another division in a low-
income-tax-rate country.
By setting a low transfer price, the company can recognize
most of the profit from the production in the low-income-
tax-rate country, thereby minimizing taxes.
Likewise, items produced by divisions in a low-income-tax-
rate country and transferred to a division in a high-
income-tax-rate country should have a high transfer price
to minimize taxes.
45
Multinational transfer
pricing
Sometimes import
duties offset income
tax effects
Most countries base
import duties on the
price paid for an item,
whether bought from
an outside company or
transferred from
another division.
Therefore, low
transfer prices
generally lead to low
import duties.
46
Multinational transfer
pricing
Suppose the full unit cost of the item is Rs. 100, and the variable
cost is Rs. 60. If tax authorities allow either variable- or full-cost
transfer prices, which should ABC Ltd choose?
In addition, suppose India imposes an import duty equal to 20% of
the price of the item and that ABC Ltd cannot deduct this import
duty for tax purposes.
Consider a item manufactured by ABC Ltd. (Switzerland) with an 8%
income tax rate and transferred to a division in India with a 40%
income tax rate.
47
By transferring @ Rs.100 in
place of Rs. 60, Co gains Rs.
4.80 p.u.
Income of the Swiss division is Rs. 40 higher; therefore it pays
8% x Rs. 40 more income taxes (Rs. 3.20)
Income of the Indian division is Rs. 40 lower; therefore it
pays 40% x Rs. 40 less income taxes (Rs.16.00)
Import duty is paid by the India division on an additional
Rs.100 – Rs.60 = Rs.40; therefore it pays 20% x Rs.40 more
duty (Rs. 8)
Net saving from transferring at Rs. 100 instead of Rs. 60 Rs. 4.80
48
Multinational transfer
pricing
Financial
restrictions
imposed by some
governments may
be avoided by an
effective use of
transfer price
In case a country
restricts the
amount of
dividend paid to
foreign owners, it
may be easier for
a company to get
cash from a
foreign division in
form of payments
for product
transferred rather
than cash
dividend
Transfer pricing
is more complex
in a
multinational
company than it
is in a domestic
company.
MNCs try to
achieve more
objectives through
transfer pricing
policies
49
Illustration
4
50
Illustration-
4C Ltd consists of the Semi-conductor Division and the
Minicomputer Division each of which operates as an independent
profit centre. Semi- conductor Division employs craftsmen, who
produce two different electronic components, the new-high
performance Super-chip and an older product called Okay-chip.
These two products have the following cost characteristics:
Super Chip Okay Chip
Material Parts Rs.20 Parts Rs.10
Labour 2 hours x Rs.
140
Rs.280 ½ hour
x
Rs.140
Rs.70
Annual Overhead in Semi-conductor Division is Rs. 40,00,000 all
fixed. Owing to high skill level necessary for the craftsmen, the
Semi-conductor Division’s capacity is set at 50,000 hours per year.
51
Illustration-
4
 To date, only one customer has developed a product utilising
super- chip, and this customer orders a maximum of 15,000
super-chips per year at a price of Rs. 600 per chip. If C cannot
meet his entire demand, the customer curtails his own
production. The rest of the semiconductor’s capacity is devoted to
Okay-chips, for which there is unlimited demand at Rs. 120 per
chip.
 The Mini-computer Division produces only one product, a process
control unit, which requires a complex circuit board imported at a
price of Rs. 600. The control unit’s costs are:
Material Circuit board Rs.600
Other Parts Rs.80
Labour 5 hours @ Rs.100 Rs.500
52
Illustration-
4
53
 The Mini-Computer Division is composed of only a small assembly plant and all
overhead is fixed at a total of Rs. 8,00,000 per year. The current market price for
the control unit is Rs. 1,400 p.u.
 A joint research project has just revealed that with minor modifications, a
single super-chip could be substituted for the circuit board currently used
by the Mini- computer division. The modification would require an extra
one hour of labour by Mini-computer’s staff, for a total of 6 hours per unit.
 Mini-computer has therefore asked Semi-conductor division to declare a
transfer price at which Semi-conductor division would sell super-chip
internally.
 Required :
 Mini-computer expects to sell 5,000 control units this year. From the overall view
point of C, how many super-chips should be transferred to Mini-computer
Division to replace circuit boards ?
 If the demand for the control unit is sure to be 5,000 units, but its price is
uncertain, what should be the transfer price of super-chip to ensure proper
decisions ? (All other data unchanged)
 If demand for the control unit rises to 12,000 units at a price of Rs. 1,400 per
unit, how many of 12,000 units should be built using Super-chip ?
Solutio
n
54
1. Contribution per hour of Super-chips and Okay-
chips:
Super-Chips Okay-Chips
Selling price p.u. (Rs.) 600 120
Less: Variable cost p.u. (Rs.) 200 80
Contribution p.u. (Rs.) 300 40
Hours reqd p.u. 2 0.5
Contb per hr 150 80
(Rs.300/2 hrs) (Rs.40/0.5 hrs)
2 . Details of hours utilised in meeting the demand of 15,000 units of Super-chips
and utilising the remaining hours for Okay-chips out of available hours of 50,000
per annum:
Hours utilised for 15,000 units of Super-chips (15,000 units × 2
hours)= Hours utilised for 40,000 units of Okay-chips (40,000 units ×
0.5 hours)=
30,000
20,000
50,000
Solutio
n
Incremental contribution per unit of a process control unit, when instead of using imported
complex circuit board Super-chip is used : Rs. 200 (Rs. 420 – Rs. 220)
55
3 . Contribution of process control unit (using imported complex circuit board): Rs.
 Selling price per unit : (A) 1,400
Variable costs :
 Circuit board (Imported) 600
 Other parts 80
 Labour cost (5 hours × Rs. 100) 500
 Total variable cost : (B) 1,180
 Contribution per unit (Rs.) {(A) – (B)} 220
4 . Contribution of a process control unit (using a Super chip) :
 Selling price per unit : (A) 1,400
Variable costs :
 Super chip (Material + Labour costs) 300
 Other parts 80
 Labour cost (6 hours × Rs. 100) 600
 Total variable cost : (B) 980
 Contribution per unit : {(A) – (B)} 420
Solutio
n
56
(i) Super-chip to be transferred to Mini Computer Division to replace Circuit Boards:
 Out of 50,000 available hours 30,000 hours are utilised for meeting the demand of
15,000 units of Super-chips, the rest 20,000 hours may be used for manufacturing
40,000 Okay- chips, which yields a contribution of Rs. 40 per unit for Rs. 80/- per
hour or a contribution of Rs. 160 per two-equivalent hours.
 In case the company decides to forego the manufacturing of 20,000 units of Okay-
chips in favour of 5,000 additional units of Super-chips to be used by Mini-Computer
Division (instead of complex imported Circuit Board) for manufacturing process
control units. This decision would increase the existing contribution of Mini-
Computer Division by Rs. 200/- per two-equivalent hours
 After taking into account the profit foregone of Okay-chips, the existing
contribution of Mini-Computer Division of C would increase by Rs. 40 per two
equivalent hours.
 Hence the entire requirement of 5,000 units of Super-chips be produced and
transferred to Mini-Computer Division.
Solutio
n
(ii) Minimum transfer price of Super-chip to Mini Computer Division :
 = Variable cost of a Super-chip + Opportunity cost of foregoing the
production of an Okay-chip and using the craftsman time for
Super-chip
= Rs. 300 + 2 hours × Rs. 80
= Rs. 460
(iii)Super-chips to be produced for the production of 12,000 units of
process control units:
 After meeting out the order of 15,000 Super-chips per year, the
concern is left out with 20,000 hours. Use of Super-chips for control
units production would increase the existing contribution of Mini-
Computer Division by Rs. 200/- per unit.
 Out of the remaining 20,000 craftsmen hours, 10,000 units of Super-
chips can be made, which may be used for the production of 10,000
process control units.
57
Multiple Choice
Questions
58
Multiple Choice
Question-1
 In the case of standard cost based transfer pricing, if there is
a variance between the standard and actual cost, how is the
same dealt with?
 A. Variances if any are ignored
 B. Variances are usually absorbed by the supplying unit
and occasionally transferred to the user unit.
 C. Variances cannot arise as the standard cost will be equal to
the actual cost
 D. If actual cost if more than standard cost, the transfer is
made at actual cost. If actual is less, it is made at standard
cost.
 Answer:
59
Multiple Choice
Question-2
 Transfer pricing helps in efficient
allocation of financial resources:
 True
 False
 Answer:
60
Multiple Choice
Question-3
 Full cost plus markup pricing suffers from the following
defect:
 A. Arbitrary markup percentage can be prejudicial to
the receiving division
 B. Selling expenses are recovered by the supplying
unit without incurring them
 C. It is unclear whether standard cost or actual cost is to
be used
 D. Creates conflicts between the division and the company
as a whole
 Answer:
61
Multiple Choice
Question-4
 Under Bargained method of transfer
pricing, divisional managers have freedom
to purchase their requirement from outside
if the prices quoted by outside party is
lower.
 True
 False
 Answer:
62
Multiple Choice
Question-5
 The main objective of multinational
transfer pricing is not to motivate
divisional managers.
 True
 False
 Answer:
63
Multiple Choice
Question-6
 “Goal congruence” refers to the alignment
of the divisional objective with the objective
of the company as a whole in intra-
company transfer pricing.
 True
 False
 Answer:
64
Multiple Choice
Question-7
 If a division in a high income tax rate country produces and
transfers a product to a low income tax rate country, the
transfer price should be:
 A. High. Then the multinational company can recognise most
of the profit in the low income tax rate country, thereby
minimising taxes
 B. Same. In the overall worldwide tax calculations, it will not
have any effect.
 C. Low. Then the multinational company can recognise most of
the profit in the low income tax rate country, thereby
minimising taxes
 D. High. Then the multinational company can recognise less of
the profit in the high income tax rate country, thereby
minimising taxes
 Answer
65
Multiple Choice
Question-8
 Transfer pricing can be achieved in a
service organisation with one division.
 True
 False
 Answer:
66
Multiple Choice
Question-9
 Transfer pricing based on actual cost alone is:
 Fair and achieves the objectives of transfer
pricing
 Not useful in motivating managers to
perform better
 Reflective of the high efficiency of the
division
 None of the above
 Answer:
67
Multiple Choice Question-
10
 If the external market for the transferred good is
not reasonably competitive and there is no idle
capacity:
 Incremental cost should be deducted from outlay
costs for determining the maximum transfer price
 Opportunity cost should be added to outlay costs
for determining minimum transfer price
 Incremental cost should be added to outlay costs
for determining minimum transfer price
 Opportunity cost should be deducted from outlay
costs for determining the maximum transfer price
 Answer:
68
Lesson
Summary
69
We appreciated that in a transfer price scenario, the income of the
supplying division is cost of the receiving division. Hence profitability of
both divisions is affected.
Various methods of transfer pricing can be broadly categorised
under: cost or variant of cost method, market price method and
negotiated price method. Cost method has several sub methods like
actual manufacturing cost, standard cost, full cost and full cost
plus mark up.
Market price based pricing is faced with the difficulty of obtaining market
prices.
Lesson
Summary
70
Negotiated/ Bargained price method develops business like attitude
amongst divisions of the company
Where profitability is used as a criteria for evaluating performance of
each division conflict may arise between the division and the
company as a whole. Goal congruence is essential in intra-company
transfer pricing.
Multinational transfer pricing is driven by factors other than motivating
managers. Here the objective is often to minimize worldwide income
taxes, import duties, and tariffs.
Thank
You

CHAPTER 6-Transfer-Pricing Advanced Management Accounting).pptx

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Learning Objectives Basic Concepts inTransfer Pricing Methods of Transfer Pricing 2
  • 3.
    Definition A transfer priceis the price charged when one segment of a company provides goods or services to another segment of the company. The fundamental objective in setting transfer prices is to motivate managers to act in the best interests of the overall company.
  • 4.
    Transfer Pricing The amountcharged when one division sells goods or services to another division Battery Division Auto Division Batteries
  • 5.
    Concep t Several divisions inan organisation Performance of each division measured in terms of profit Manager of the division responsible for its performance/ profits When goods are transferred, income of the supplying division is the cost of the receiving division Thus Transfer price fixed will affect the profitability of both divisions 4
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Methods of Transfer Pricing Pricingat bargained or negotiated price Pricing at Market Price Pricing at Cost or variants of cost method Actual Manufacturing Cost Standard Cost Full Cost Full Cost + Markup 6
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Actual Manufacturing Cost 8 Goods orservices are transferred at their actual cost of production Useful for those units where the responsibility of profit performance is centralised Difficult to measure the performance of each profit centre
  • 10.
    Standard Cost Transfers of goodsand services are made at their standard cost Any difference between actual and standard cost viz., variances are usually absorbed by the supplying unit. Occasionally, variances are transferred to the user unit This will result in the inventory being carried at identical standard cost by both the supplying and receiving units Here also the profit performance responsibility is centralised and thus it cannot be measured for individual units involved 9
  • 11.
    Full Cost Pricing Full costmeans cost of production plus expenses like selling and distribution, administration, research and development cost etc In this method, the supplying unit is not allowed to make any profit on transfers to other units. But it is free to earn profit on outside sale One good thing about this method is that the supplying unit is allowed to recover the full cost of the goods/services transferred 10
  • 12.
    Full Cost +Markup Pricing Supplying unit transfers goods and services at full cost plus some mark-up The markup added to full cost is either expressed as a percentage of full cost or of capital employed Selling expenses here are recovered by the supplying unit without incurring them, especially when the goods/services are transferred internally Due to this defect the use of full cost plus method is not appreciated by the internal receiving units To overcome this defect either the use of standard cost plus or actual cost plus are preferred Use of either of the preceding method facilitates the task of measuring profit performance and efficiency of the units involved 11
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Objectiv e Transfer prices of goods/services transferredto other units/divisions are based on market prices In a competitive market goods/services cannot be transferred to its users at a higher price. Such a competitive market provides an incentive to efficient production Since market prices will, by and large be determined by demand and supply in the long run, it is claimed that profits which results under this method, will provide a good indicator of the overall efficiency of the various units Competitive market prices provide reliable measures of divisional income because these prices are established independently rather than by individuals who have an interest in the results 13
  • 15.
    Market Pricing - Limitations Difficultyin obtaining market prices Difficulty in determining the elements of selling and distribution expenses such as commission, discounts, advertisement and sales promotion etc., so that necessary adjustment may be made in the market price to provide benefit of these expenses, to the profit centre, receiving the goods. 14
  • 16.
    III. Pricing atBargained Price 23
  • 17.
    Methodolog y Under this methodeach decentralised unit is considered as an independent unit and such units decide the transfer price by negotiations or bargaining Divisional managers have full freedom to purchase their requirement from outside if the prices quoted by the outside party is lower A system of negotiated prices develops business like attitude amongst divisions of the company To avoid any reduction in overall profits of the company, top management may impose restriction on the external purchase/sale of goods 24
  • 18.
    Intra-Company Transfer In order tohave an effective system of intra-company transfer pricing the following points should be kept in view: Prices of all transfers in and out of a profit centre should be determined by negotiation between the buyer and the seller Negotiations should have access to full data on alternative sources and markets and to public and private information about market prices Buyers and sellers should be completely free to deal outside the company 25
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Problem Statement 34 Products X YZ Rs. Rs. Rs. External mkt price p.u. 48 46 40 Variable cost of prodn in Divn A 33 24 28 Labour hrs reqd p.u. in divn A 3 4 2  Division A is a profit centre which produces three products X, Y and Z. Each product has an external market.
  • 21.
    Problem Statement What should thetransfer price be for each unit for 300 units of Y, if the total labour hours available in Division A are: 3,800 hours 5,600 hours Instead of receiving transfers of product Y from Division A, Division B could buy similar product in the open market at slightly cheaper price of Rs. 45 p.u. The maximum external sales are: X: 800 units; Y: 500 units; Z: 300 units Product Y can be transferred to Division B, but the maximum quantity that might be required for transfer is 300 units of Y. 35
  • 22.
    Solution: (i) Hoursrequired to meet maximum demand 36 External sales Hours reqd p.u. Total Hrs (i) (ii) (iii)=(i) x (ii) X 800 units 3 2,400 Y 500 units 4 2,000 Z 300 units 2 600 Total 5,000
  • 23.
    Contribution Per Unit 37 Product XY Z Rs. Rs. Rs. Selling Price 48 46 40 Less: Variable cost 33 24 28 Contribution p.u. (A) 15 22 12 Labour hrs reqd p.u.(B) 3 4 2 Contb p. hr (A)/ (B) 5 5.5 6 Ranking III II I
  • 24.
    3,800 Hours (a) If only3,800 hours are available in Division A: 300 units of Z (maximum), which will take 500 units of Y (maximum), which will take 400 units of X to use remaining hrs.  600 hrs. 2,000 hrs. 1,200 hrs. 3,800 hrs.   Transfer price  (i) Variable cost of Y 24.00 Opportunity cost  (ii) Contribution relating to ‘X’ forgone for producing additional units of Y (4 hrs × Rs. 5*) 20.00 44.00 *Y takes 4 hours and in each hour production of X would have generated contribution of Rs. 5. 38
  • 25.
    5,600 Hours (b) If 5,600hours are available  Maximum time required to meet external sales (Refer to Working note 1)  Hours now available  It means 600 hrs can be easily used for the production of Y and transfer price will be variable cost only i.e. (600 hrs. ÷ 4 hrs) × Rs. 24 Note: Y takes 4 hours per unit 5,000 hrs. 5,600 hrs. Rs. 3,600  For producing additional 150 units, production of X will be disturbed. Variable costs  (i) 150 units of X @ Rs. 24 Opportunity cost Rs. 3,600  (ii) Contribution of ‘X’ units forgone (600 hrs. × Rs. 5) Rs. 3,000* 6,600  Total price for 300 units 10,200  Thus, Average transfer price should be Rs. 34 per unit *Contribution per hr. of X foregone 39
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Conflict s Where profitability isused as a criteria for evaluating the performance of each division, conflict arises between a division of the company and company as a whole Under decentralisation it is expected that the top management should not interfere with the decision making process of its subordinates heading different units The management of such companies also expects that each division should not only achieve its own objective necessary for evaluating the performance but should also achieve the objective of goal congruence. 41
  • 28.
    Conflict s If a divisionfails to achieve the objective of ‘goal congruence’ the management of the company may dictate their ‘transfer price’ Such interference of management of the company is usually the main basis of conflict between a division and the company as a whole Conflict is aggravated if management advocates transfer of goods and services at cost The profitability of the transferring division will not be known by the use of such a transfer price 42
  • 29.
  • 30.
    Multinational transfer pricing Multinational companies mayuse transfer prices to minimize worldwide income taxes, import duties, and tariffs. For example, an MNC might prefer to make its profits in a country, where maximum corporate tax rate is 28%, rather than in some other place where the rate is 35% 44
  • 31.
    Multinational transfer pricing Suppose adivision in a high-income-tax-rate country produces a sub-assembly for another division in a low- income-tax-rate country. By setting a low transfer price, the company can recognize most of the profit from the production in the low-income- tax-rate country, thereby minimizing taxes. Likewise, items produced by divisions in a low-income-tax- rate country and transferred to a division in a high- income-tax-rate country should have a high transfer price to minimize taxes. 45
  • 32.
    Multinational transfer pricing Sometimes import dutiesoffset income tax effects Most countries base import duties on the price paid for an item, whether bought from an outside company or transferred from another division. Therefore, low transfer prices generally lead to low import duties. 46
  • 33.
    Multinational transfer pricing Suppose thefull unit cost of the item is Rs. 100, and the variable cost is Rs. 60. If tax authorities allow either variable- or full-cost transfer prices, which should ABC Ltd choose? In addition, suppose India imposes an import duty equal to 20% of the price of the item and that ABC Ltd cannot deduct this import duty for tax purposes. Consider a item manufactured by ABC Ltd. (Switzerland) with an 8% income tax rate and transferred to a division in India with a 40% income tax rate. 47
  • 34.
    By transferring @Rs.100 in place of Rs. 60, Co gains Rs. 4.80 p.u. Income of the Swiss division is Rs. 40 higher; therefore it pays 8% x Rs. 40 more income taxes (Rs. 3.20) Income of the Indian division is Rs. 40 lower; therefore it pays 40% x Rs. 40 less income taxes (Rs.16.00) Import duty is paid by the India division on an additional Rs.100 – Rs.60 = Rs.40; therefore it pays 20% x Rs.40 more duty (Rs. 8) Net saving from transferring at Rs. 100 instead of Rs. 60 Rs. 4.80 48
  • 35.
    Multinational transfer pricing Financial restrictions imposed bysome governments may be avoided by an effective use of transfer price In case a country restricts the amount of dividend paid to foreign owners, it may be easier for a company to get cash from a foreign division in form of payments for product transferred rather than cash dividend Transfer pricing is more complex in a multinational company than it is in a domestic company. MNCs try to achieve more objectives through transfer pricing policies 49
  • 36.
  • 37.
    Illustration- 4C Ltd consistsof the Semi-conductor Division and the Minicomputer Division each of which operates as an independent profit centre. Semi- conductor Division employs craftsmen, who produce two different electronic components, the new-high performance Super-chip and an older product called Okay-chip. These two products have the following cost characteristics: Super Chip Okay Chip Material Parts Rs.20 Parts Rs.10 Labour 2 hours x Rs. 140 Rs.280 ½ hour x Rs.140 Rs.70 Annual Overhead in Semi-conductor Division is Rs. 40,00,000 all fixed. Owing to high skill level necessary for the craftsmen, the Semi-conductor Division’s capacity is set at 50,000 hours per year. 51
  • 38.
    Illustration- 4  To date,only one customer has developed a product utilising super- chip, and this customer orders a maximum of 15,000 super-chips per year at a price of Rs. 600 per chip. If C cannot meet his entire demand, the customer curtails his own production. The rest of the semiconductor’s capacity is devoted to Okay-chips, for which there is unlimited demand at Rs. 120 per chip.  The Mini-computer Division produces only one product, a process control unit, which requires a complex circuit board imported at a price of Rs. 600. The control unit’s costs are: Material Circuit board Rs.600 Other Parts Rs.80 Labour 5 hours @ Rs.100 Rs.500 52
  • 39.
    Illustration- 4 53  The Mini-ComputerDivision is composed of only a small assembly plant and all overhead is fixed at a total of Rs. 8,00,000 per year. The current market price for the control unit is Rs. 1,400 p.u.  A joint research project has just revealed that with minor modifications, a single super-chip could be substituted for the circuit board currently used by the Mini- computer division. The modification would require an extra one hour of labour by Mini-computer’s staff, for a total of 6 hours per unit.  Mini-computer has therefore asked Semi-conductor division to declare a transfer price at which Semi-conductor division would sell super-chip internally.  Required :  Mini-computer expects to sell 5,000 control units this year. From the overall view point of C, how many super-chips should be transferred to Mini-computer Division to replace circuit boards ?  If the demand for the control unit is sure to be 5,000 units, but its price is uncertain, what should be the transfer price of super-chip to ensure proper decisions ? (All other data unchanged)  If demand for the control unit rises to 12,000 units at a price of Rs. 1,400 per unit, how many of 12,000 units should be built using Super-chip ?
  • 40.
    Solutio n 54 1. Contribution perhour of Super-chips and Okay- chips: Super-Chips Okay-Chips Selling price p.u. (Rs.) 600 120 Less: Variable cost p.u. (Rs.) 200 80 Contribution p.u. (Rs.) 300 40 Hours reqd p.u. 2 0.5 Contb per hr 150 80 (Rs.300/2 hrs) (Rs.40/0.5 hrs) 2 . Details of hours utilised in meeting the demand of 15,000 units of Super-chips and utilising the remaining hours for Okay-chips out of available hours of 50,000 per annum: Hours utilised for 15,000 units of Super-chips (15,000 units × 2 hours)= Hours utilised for 40,000 units of Okay-chips (40,000 units × 0.5 hours)= 30,000 20,000 50,000
  • 41.
    Solutio n Incremental contribution perunit of a process control unit, when instead of using imported complex circuit board Super-chip is used : Rs. 200 (Rs. 420 – Rs. 220) 55 3 . Contribution of process control unit (using imported complex circuit board): Rs.  Selling price per unit : (A) 1,400 Variable costs :  Circuit board (Imported) 600  Other parts 80  Labour cost (5 hours × Rs. 100) 500  Total variable cost : (B) 1,180  Contribution per unit (Rs.) {(A) – (B)} 220 4 . Contribution of a process control unit (using a Super chip) :  Selling price per unit : (A) 1,400 Variable costs :  Super chip (Material + Labour costs) 300  Other parts 80  Labour cost (6 hours × Rs. 100) 600  Total variable cost : (B) 980  Contribution per unit : {(A) – (B)} 420
  • 42.
    Solutio n 56 (i) Super-chip tobe transferred to Mini Computer Division to replace Circuit Boards:  Out of 50,000 available hours 30,000 hours are utilised for meeting the demand of 15,000 units of Super-chips, the rest 20,000 hours may be used for manufacturing 40,000 Okay- chips, which yields a contribution of Rs. 40 per unit for Rs. 80/- per hour or a contribution of Rs. 160 per two-equivalent hours.  In case the company decides to forego the manufacturing of 20,000 units of Okay- chips in favour of 5,000 additional units of Super-chips to be used by Mini-Computer Division (instead of complex imported Circuit Board) for manufacturing process control units. This decision would increase the existing contribution of Mini- Computer Division by Rs. 200/- per two-equivalent hours  After taking into account the profit foregone of Okay-chips, the existing contribution of Mini-Computer Division of C would increase by Rs. 40 per two equivalent hours.  Hence the entire requirement of 5,000 units of Super-chips be produced and transferred to Mini-Computer Division.
  • 43.
    Solutio n (ii) Minimum transferprice of Super-chip to Mini Computer Division :  = Variable cost of a Super-chip + Opportunity cost of foregoing the production of an Okay-chip and using the craftsman time for Super-chip = Rs. 300 + 2 hours × Rs. 80 = Rs. 460 (iii)Super-chips to be produced for the production of 12,000 units of process control units:  After meeting out the order of 15,000 Super-chips per year, the concern is left out with 20,000 hours. Use of Super-chips for control units production would increase the existing contribution of Mini- Computer Division by Rs. 200/- per unit.  Out of the remaining 20,000 craftsmen hours, 10,000 units of Super- chips can be made, which may be used for the production of 10,000 process control units. 57
  • 44.
  • 45.
    Multiple Choice Question-1  Inthe case of standard cost based transfer pricing, if there is a variance between the standard and actual cost, how is the same dealt with?  A. Variances if any are ignored  B. Variances are usually absorbed by the supplying unit and occasionally transferred to the user unit.  C. Variances cannot arise as the standard cost will be equal to the actual cost  D. If actual cost if more than standard cost, the transfer is made at actual cost. If actual is less, it is made at standard cost.  Answer: 59
  • 46.
    Multiple Choice Question-2  Transferpricing helps in efficient allocation of financial resources:  True  False  Answer: 60
  • 47.
    Multiple Choice Question-3  Fullcost plus markup pricing suffers from the following defect:  A. Arbitrary markup percentage can be prejudicial to the receiving division  B. Selling expenses are recovered by the supplying unit without incurring them  C. It is unclear whether standard cost or actual cost is to be used  D. Creates conflicts between the division and the company as a whole  Answer: 61
  • 48.
    Multiple Choice Question-4  UnderBargained method of transfer pricing, divisional managers have freedom to purchase their requirement from outside if the prices quoted by outside party is lower.  True  False  Answer: 62
  • 49.
    Multiple Choice Question-5  Themain objective of multinational transfer pricing is not to motivate divisional managers.  True  False  Answer: 63
  • 50.
    Multiple Choice Question-6  “Goalcongruence” refers to the alignment of the divisional objective with the objective of the company as a whole in intra- company transfer pricing.  True  False  Answer: 64
  • 51.
    Multiple Choice Question-7  Ifa division in a high income tax rate country produces and transfers a product to a low income tax rate country, the transfer price should be:  A. High. Then the multinational company can recognise most of the profit in the low income tax rate country, thereby minimising taxes  B. Same. In the overall worldwide tax calculations, it will not have any effect.  C. Low. Then the multinational company can recognise most of the profit in the low income tax rate country, thereby minimising taxes  D. High. Then the multinational company can recognise less of the profit in the high income tax rate country, thereby minimising taxes  Answer 65
  • 52.
    Multiple Choice Question-8  Transferpricing can be achieved in a service organisation with one division.  True  False  Answer: 66
  • 53.
    Multiple Choice Question-9  Transferpricing based on actual cost alone is:  Fair and achieves the objectives of transfer pricing  Not useful in motivating managers to perform better  Reflective of the high efficiency of the division  None of the above  Answer: 67
  • 54.
    Multiple Choice Question- 10 If the external market for the transferred good is not reasonably competitive and there is no idle capacity:  Incremental cost should be deducted from outlay costs for determining the maximum transfer price  Opportunity cost should be added to outlay costs for determining minimum transfer price  Incremental cost should be added to outlay costs for determining minimum transfer price  Opportunity cost should be deducted from outlay costs for determining the maximum transfer price  Answer: 68
  • 55.
    Lesson Summary 69 We appreciated thatin a transfer price scenario, the income of the supplying division is cost of the receiving division. Hence profitability of both divisions is affected. Various methods of transfer pricing can be broadly categorised under: cost or variant of cost method, market price method and negotiated price method. Cost method has several sub methods like actual manufacturing cost, standard cost, full cost and full cost plus mark up. Market price based pricing is faced with the difficulty of obtaining market prices.
  • 56.
    Lesson Summary 70 Negotiated/ Bargained pricemethod develops business like attitude amongst divisions of the company Where profitability is used as a criteria for evaluating performance of each division conflict may arise between the division and the company as a whole. Goal congruence is essential in intra-company transfer pricing. Multinational transfer pricing is driven by factors other than motivating managers. Here the objective is often to minimize worldwide income taxes, import duties, and tariffs.
  • 57.

Editor's Notes

  • #3 A transfer price is the price charged when one segment of a company provides goods or services to another segment of the company. While domestic transfer prices have no direct effect on the entire company’s reported profit, they can have a dramatic effect on the reported profitability of a division.   The fundamental objective in setting transfer prices is to motivate managers to act in the best interests of the overall company. Suboptimization occurs when managers do not act in the best interests of the overall company or even their own divisions.