Classical realism in International Relations

Classical realism in International Relations

• 1.
  Classical Realism “IR isthe result of Human nature.
• 2.
  1) Theosydides (395-460BC) • Man is a Political animal • States are like animals- deffirent on size and powers. • They strive for power and wish to determinate others.
• 3.
  2) Machiavelli (1469-1527) •Power (the lion) and deception (the fox) are the two essentials for Foreign policy. • Ruler should seek advantage to defend its interest to ensure survival. • Ruler must not be a lion,cunning,and Ruthless. • Ruler must not act according to ethics; “Love your neighbor”, be peaceful and avoid war, be charitable, stand with oppressed , help poor, etc
• 4.
  3) Hobbes (1588-1679) •System is anarchic • People find themselves in permanent states of war. • War of all against all is inevitable to survive.
• 5.
  4) Morgenthau (1904-1980) •Men and women are borne to pursue power • They have lust for power. • This lust brings them into conflict with each others.
• 6.
  Concluding Points ofClassical Realism… • Politics have roots in human nature. • Interest determine political conduct. • Interest defined in terms of power. • Realism rejects the legalistic-moralist apprach to International politics.