Download to read offline
Uploaded byCenter for Energy and Environment
Cold-Climate Research Round-Up
The document outlines a bi-annual webinar series focusing on advancements in clean energy technologies suitable for cold climates. It highlights key findings from research on various topics such as energy recovery ventilation, indoor pool optimization, and innovative sealing techniques, with a goal to maximize energy efficiency and savings. The document also includes references to supporting organizations, future prospects, and an upcoming webinar schedule.
More Related Content
Similar to Cold-Climate Research Round-Up
More from Center for Energy and Environment
Cold-Climate Research Round-Up
- 1. Cold-Climate Research Round-Up A Bi-AnnualWebinar Series | Center for Energy & Environment and Seventhwave On the ground impacts & opportunities for leading edge, clean energy technologies & services.
- 2. The Purpose A semi-annualwebinar series to share leading field research & expertise on efficient and clean energy solutions, particularly relevant for cold climate applications. Next webinar: July 2017
- 3. Our Expertise • Conductprimary research in the field • Produce market characterizations & potential studies • Provide training & engagement to convey new info • Provide services and consulting to entities that are looking to increase clean energy & conservation CEE | 8 Dedicated research staff Seventhwave| 5 dedicated research staff
- 4. Today’s Round-Up • Commissioningfor daylighting controls • Optimizing operation of buildings with indoor pools • Energy Recovery Ventilation effectiveness • Maximizing energy savings from Demand Control Ventilation • Cold-Climate Variable Refrigerant Flow optimization • Innovative aerosol envelope sealing • Next generation Air Source Heat Pumps • Hybrid geothermal achieves highest performance
- 5. Pg. 5 Many ofthese projects were supported by a grant funds from the MN Department of Commerce, Division of Energy Resources through the Conservation Applied Research and Development (CARD) program.
- 6. Today’s Round-Up • Commissioningfor daylighting controls | Seventhwave • Optimizing operation of buildings with indoor pools • Energy Recovery Ventilation effectiveness • Maximizing energy savings from Demand Control Ventilation • Cold-Climate Variable Refrigerant Flow optimization • Innovative aerosol envelope sealing • Next generation Air Source Heat Pumps • Hybrid geothermal achieves highest performance
- 7. Today’s Round-Up • Commissioningfor daylighting controls • Optimizing operation of buildings with indoor pools | CEE • Energy Recovery Ventilation effectiveness | CEE • Maximizing energy savings from Demand Control Ventilation • Cold-Climate Variable Refrigerant Flow optimization • Innovative aerosol envelope sealing • Next generation Air Source Heat Pumps • Hybrid geothermal achieves highest performance
- 8. Areas of expertise: Energy efficiency programs Field research Market characterization High performance design Education and training
- 9. Commissioning for Daylighting Controls Minnesota ConservationApplied Research and Development (CARD) Grant Program
- 10. Background and Objective 1.Photosensor 2. Controller 3. Dimming Unit
- 11. Research Approach Monitored 20spaces across 10 buildings Period 1 Energy Period 1 Savings Current without photocontrol Period 3 Energy Period 3 Savings
- 12. Results and Recommendations 23%savings before Cx, increased to 43% with Cx seventhwave.org/mndaylighting
- 13. Research Financing Policy Programs Discover +Deploy the most effective solutions for a healthy, low-carbon economy Planning & Consulting
- 14. Pg. 14 Optimizing IndoorPublic Pools A high energy intensity area with specialty HVAC systems Russ Landry P.E. | Senior Mechanical Engineer
- 15. Pg. 15 Indoor PublicPools Why we took a look | We’ve seen big energy saving opportunities in other facilities with specialized HVAC systems, such as ice arenas. Research Objective | Determine energy cost savings from improvements & develop guides for operators and recommissioning providers. Extent of Project Efforts • Literature review & identification of indoor public pools in Minnesota • Surveys of 30 sites • Recommissioning and savings verification for 5 sites • Guides for pool operators and recommissioning providers. Notable Previous Work • Pool operator certification manuals • DOE sponsored RSPEC! software Conducted Jan 2014 – May 2017 Indoor Public Pool Optimization
- 16. Pg. 16 Technology inBrief Indoor Public Pool Optimization Pool Water Heating & Filtering Space Ventilation, Heating & Dehumidification 84°F 55% RH 82°F
- 17. Pg. 17 Headline Findings& Observations Energy & Cost Savings • Some consistent, “prescriptive” type opportunities • Site-specific control & operational “problems” • Some “common wisdom” not true for cold climates • Biggest savings for heating fuel (some electric hvac) Barriers to Field Implementation • Contractor & manufacturer execution of control details • Often poor BAS link with HVAC & pool water heating • User & operator upkeep: cover & controls Bright Spots & Opportunities • Cover • Cost-effective control fixes Indoor Public Pool Optimization
- 18. Pg. 18 Highlights ofPreliminary Savings Indoor Public Pool Optimization
- 19. Pg. 19 Benefits BeyondEnergy Building Operators • Reduced Comfort Complaints • Simple Actions with Clear Directions from Operations Guide Building Owners • Reduced Comfort Complaints • Equipment Longevity • Facility Longevity Indoor Public Pool Optimization
- 20. Pg. 20 How toUse This Information How you can use this information today, take action, or access more tools… • www.mncee.org/pool • http://smartenergy.arch.uiuc.edu • http://www.rlmartin.com/rspec/software.htm Indoor Public Pool Optimization
- 21. Pg. 21 Energy Recoveryin Commercial and Institutional Buildings Do energy recovery systems meet performance expectations? Josh Quinnell Ph D | Senior Research Engineer Minnesota Conservation Applied Research and Development (CARD) Grant Program
- 22. Pg. 22 C&I EnergyRecovery Why we took a look • Anecdotal impression that ERVs may not live up to savings potential Research Objective • Characterize ERVs in Minnesota, determine extent of problems, study a subset of representative ERVs in detail Extent of Data Collected • Data collected on 400 commercial & institutional ERVs • Screened 30 ERVs for study • Selected 9 units for detailed study, measurements, and long term monitoring Notable Previous Work • Prior work is design focused, usually on the cooling side • Stops short of the practical issues associated with expectations, installation, and operations Conducted Jan 2014 – Dec 2016 Commercial and Institutional Energy Recovery
- 23. Pg. 23 Exhaust Air-to-AirEnergy Recovery Ventilation (ERV) in Brief • Purpose: Transfer energy between exhaust air and outside air to lower energy load of building ventilation • Relevance: Increasing code requirements • Performance Expectations: • 40 - 85% heating savings • 0 – 20 % cooling savings Commercial and Institutional Energy Recovery
- 24. Pg. 24 General Findings& Observations Expectations: ERVs are just another HVAC system • Properly designed, installed, and operated ERVs typically achieve design performance Reality: Barriers to ERV Performance are practical • There are no consistent expectations for ERV performance • 80% of the problems occur during installation or operation • Problems persist because expectations aren’t established and other HVAC systems compensate Opportunity: Most lost recovery is an easy fix • A small number of issues were responsible for the vast majority of energy penalties Commercial and Institutional Energy Recovery
- 25. Pg. 25 Problems onERV systems • 75 issues discovered and 51 corrected • Energy savings increased $40,683 -> $57,851 for 9 units or 0.30 to 0.42 $/supply-cfm • 15% of issues responsible for 92% of lost energy recovery 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Frequency
- 26. Pg. 26 Problems Encounteredon ERVs Commercial and Institutional Energy Recovery High functioning units – 33% units / 8% problems • Design-bid-build projects • Robust documentation & commissioning process • Typically found only neglected maintenance items Functioning units – 33% units / 38% problems • Awareness of minor problems, frustration or confusion about unit operation • Odd sequencing, BAS issues, sensor, scheduling, and set point problems Dysfunctional units – 33% units / 53% problems • Awareness of minor problems, no awareness of major ones • Heat recovery casually disabled and poor installation
- 27. Pg. 27 Opportunities Commercial andInstitutional Energy Recovery Text book examples of ERV applications are common! •We know that dramatic energy savings are possible in practice •Robust documentation, commissioning, and hand off are key to success •Improving general maintenance is still an opportunity for the best systems Most problems don’t seriously inhibit energy recovery! •Consistent with the types of problems reported outside this work •There is still a huge opportunity; these problems indirectly impact expectations and impressions of energy recovery –typically unrelated to actual recovery performance It’s easy to identify dysfunctional units! •If a unit runs 5 ᵒF– 45ᵒF and above 75ᵒF, 85% savings are achieved •In many situations it is easy to casually disable energy recovery, but it’s also easy to re-enable it and perform basic training about specific controls
- 28. Today’s Round-Up • Commissioningfor daylighting controls • Optimizing operation of buildings with indoor pools • Energy Recovery Ventilation effectiveness • Maximizing energy savings from DCVs | Seventhwave • ccVariable Refrigerant Flow optimization | Seventhwave • Innovative aerosol envelope sealing • Next generation Air Source Heat Pumps • Hybrid geothermal achieves highest performance
- 29. Maximizing Energy Savings from Demand ControlVentilation Minnesota Conservation Applied Research and Development (CARD) Grant Program
- 30. Background and Objective Sensor VAVBoxes Central and/or Zone Control AHU Source: http://i.stack.imgur.com/4WKDC.jpg SA OA RA
- 31. Research Approach 96 systemsaround Minnesota
- 32.
- 33. Results and Recommendations seventhwave.org/dcv •Most room for improvement was found in basic design • Proper commissioning (or recommissioning) has a significant impact on its performance • Identifed four key program opportunities
- 34.
- 35.
- 36. Research Approach o Whatshould the mechanical room setpoint be? o How to operate louvers? o Should supplemental heating be natural gas or electric? o What is the optimal defrost strategy? o How to handle condensate from supplemental heater? Energy Balance Energy Consumption 1. Outdoor units • heating and/or cooling 2. Supplemental heating 3. Auxiliary heating • baseboard 4. Mechanical room ventilation fan
- 37. Results and Recommendations Optimal Theoptimal mechanical room setpoint occurs at a temperature close to, but higher than, the temperature at which the VRF system’s heating efficiency and capacity are significantly reduced. o Supplemental heating should be provided by natural gas. o Demand defrost saves 4% of VRF energy as compared to timed defrost. seventhwave.org/cold-climate-vrf
- 38. Today’s Round-Up • Commissioningfor daylighting controls • Optimizing operation of buildings with indoor pools • Energy Recovery Ventilation effectiveness • Maximizing energy savings from Demand Control Ventilation • Cold-Climate Variable Refrigerant Flow optimization • Innovative aerosol envelope sealing | CEE • Next generation Air Source Heat Pumps | CEE • Hybrid geothermal achieves highest performance
- 39. Pg. 39 Aerosol Sealing Anew building envelope technology for renovation & new construction projects Dave Bohac P.E. | Director of Research Minnesota Conservation Applied Research and Development (CARD) Grant Program Partners
- 40. Pg. 40 Multifamily AerosolSealing Why we took a look • Proven duct sealing technology. UC Davis/WCEC performed lab tests and limited demonstration for envelope sealing Research Objective • Demonstrate leakage reduction in multifamily buildings and refine sealing protocol Extent of Data Collected • Sealed 16 units in 3 new construction buildings • Sealed 9 units in 3 existing buildings • Modeled energy savings and air flow impacts Conducted Jan 2014 – July 2016 Aerosol Envelope Sealing of Multifamily Buildings
- 41. Pg. 41 Aerosol EnvelopeSealing – How Does it Do That? • Pressurize apartment • Spray air sealing fog Aerosol Envelope Sealing of Multifamily Buildings
- 42. Pg. 42 Air SealingResults: New Construction Aerosol Envelope Sealing of Multifamily Buildings • Average leakage reduction of 81% • Average leakage = 0.7 ACH50 after sealing • All units at least 80% tighter than EPA ENERGY STAR requirement of 0.3 CFM50/sf • Half of the units met 0.6 ACH50 passive house standard • 69 therms/yr savings (3 to 0.6ACH50 reduction)
- 43. Pg. 43 What GetsSealed? Aerosol Envelope Sealing of Multifamily Buildings
- 44. Pg. 44 What GetsSealed? Aerosol Envelope Sealing of Multifamily Buildings
- 45. Pg. 45 Air SealingResults: Existing Buildings Aerosol Envelope Sealing of Multifamily Buildings • Median leakage reduction of 75% • Medain pre-leakage of 13.7 ACH50 reduced to 3.2 ACH50 • 60 to 200 therms/yr savings depending on existing leakage
- 46. Pg. 46 Non-Energy Benefits •Improved IAQ from reduced air transfer between units • Reduced sound transmission between neighbors and outdoors • More reliable method for meeting tightness requirements and test is part of service Aerosol Envelope Sealing of Multifamily Buildings Mechanical ventilation required after sealing and balanced ventilation needed for tighter units
- 47. Pg. 47 Future Work •Final report available soon • DOE Building America: integrate sealing into new house construction process • WCEC – Department of Defense large building sealing • Aeroseal has started commercial work and developing contractor network Q4 2017 Aerosol Envelope Sealing of Multifamily Buildings
- 48. Pg. 48 Next generationAir Source Heat Pumps Are the new generation of air source heat pumps a good fit for cold climate heating? Ben Schoenbauer | Senior Mechanical Engineer Partner
- 49. Pg. 49 Field Assessmentof Cold-Climate Air Source Heat Pumps (ccASHPs) Why we took a look • Technological advancements have expanded the applicable climates • Potential to serve an under-represented sector Research Objective • Characterize system performance and installation challenges • Assess the implications to policy and programs Extent of Data Collected • Data collected in 6 homes over 2 heating seasons Notable Previous Work • Research and program development in “cool” climates (NE and NW) Conducted Jan 2015 – Aug 2017 ccASHPs
- 50. Pg. 50 ccASHPs inBrief • Technology Purpose: To provide energy efficient space conditioning through the transfer of heat between the exterior and interior of a home (a.k.a. an alternative primary source) • Applications: Potential to meet the needs of an under- served group (homes heated with delivered fuels or electricity) • Expectations: 1.5x or larger increase to space heating COP while maintaining comfort ccASHP
- 51. Pg. 51 Findings &Observations Expectations and Concerns • Can ASHP really transfer heat at cold outdoor conditions? Reality from the Field ccASHPs provide benefits down to and beyond 10 ⁰ F, including: • COPs more than 1.5x as efficient as baseline systems • Sufficient capacities to meet the heating loads of most MN homes • Sufficient airflow and temperatures to condition most homes comfortably Opportunity for the Future • Integration with existing systems • Initial costs • Eliminate or minimize the need to backup ccASHP
- 52. Pg. 52 Bright Spots& Opportunities • Site energy savings • Energy cost reductions • Reduced reliance of delivered fuels and/or peak electricity Benefits Beyond Energy • Opportunities to serve in rural communities How You Might Use this Information • Utilities: • Heating rebates & programs that service this technology • Contractors: • A signal that new gen products are appropriate in MN & guidance on when • Architects & Engineers: • Consider as viable technology in all parts of MN ccASHP
- 53. Today’s Round-Up • Commissioningfor daylighting controls • Optimizing operation of buildings with indoor pools • Energy Recovery Ventilation effectiveness • Maximizing energy savings from Demand Control Ventilation • Cold-Climate Variable Refrigerant Flow optimization • Innovative aerosol envelope sealing • Next generation Air Source Heat Pumps • Hybrid geothermal achieves highest performance | Seventhwave
- 54.
- 55.
- 56. Background and Objective Examplesystem Cooling dominated Coupled hydronic loops Series supplemental device Dedicated supplemental pump
- 57. Research Approach Cashman Equipment(cooling dominant) 300k ft2 equipment dealer in Henderson, NV East Career and Technical Academy (cooling dominant) 250k ft2 vocational high school in Las Vegas, NV Tobacco Lofts (heating dominant) 74k ft2 multifamily building in Madison, WI
- 58. Results and Recommendations 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 EastCTACashman TobaccoLofts EnergyandWaterCost($/ft2) Conventional HVAC GSHP System HybridGSHP System ….for East CTA building $8,000,000 $9,000,000 $10,000,000 $11,000,000 $12,000,000 GSHP Hybrid Conventional $8,000,000 $9,000,000 $10,000,000 $11,000,000 $12,000,000 GSHP Hybrid Conventional Cooling Tower Cost GHX Cost Other Costs AnnualCosts($/ft2)
- 59. Results and Recommendations AdjustedInternal Rate of Return Cashman East CTA Tobacco Lofts Hybrid instead of Conventional 10% 12% 9% GSHP instead of hybrid 5% 4% 1%
- 60.
- 61. Pg. 61 Resources fora deeper look Seventhwave Daylight control commissioning| www.seventhwave.org/mndaylighting Demand Control Ventilation | www.seventhwave.org/dcv Hybrid Geothermal Controls | www.seventhwave.org/hygchp CEE Energy recovery ventilation | www.mncee.org/erv Air source heat pumps | www.mncee.org/heat_pumps Pool facility operations | www.mncee.org/pool Aerosol sealing | www.mncee.org/aero
- 62. Pg. 62 Your Turn... Question& Answer
- 63. Pg. 63 Series SneakPeak | July 2017 • Characteristics & savings opportunities for residential high energy users • Energy saving opportunities in mobile homes • Home HVAC install and maintenance opportunities • Small embedded data center energy saving strategies • Commercial energy codes support program pilot Upcoming Deeper Dive Webinars • Roof-top Unit Market Characterization | March 2017 • Aerosol Envelope Sealing | spring 2017 • Energy Recovery Ventilation Research Results | summer 2017 • Commercial Duct Leakage Reduction Opportunities | spring 2017
- 64. Pg. 64 Contacts Dave Bohac|Director of Research [email protected] Russ Landry| Sr. Mechanical Engineer [email protected] Josh Quinnell| Sr. Research Engineer [email protected] Ben Schoenbauer| Sr. Research Engineer [email protected] Doug Ahl | Director of Research [email protected] Scott Schuetter | Sr. Energy Engineer [email protected]
Editor's Notes
- #41 At a DOE Building America meeting a few years ago I was blown away by a presentation by Mark Modera on aerosol envelope sealing. The aerosol duct sealing technology was developed over 15 years ago. Thousands of system have been sealed by Aeroseal contractors and it is common to get leakage reductions of over 90%. The Western Cooling Efficiency Center at UC Davis has been adapting the technology to seal building envelopes. At the start of this project they had completed lab tests and a limited number of demonstration projects on houses. We initiated a project with them to demonstrate the aerosol envelope sealing process for existing and new multifamily buildings. Thru this project we sealed 16 units in 3 new construction buildings and 9 units in 3 existing buildings. All of the existing buildings were being renovated and were unoccupied. UC Davis also performed multizone air flow and building energy modeling to evaluate the impact of sealing MF buildings in Minnesota.
- #42 The process for aerosol envelope sealing is similar to that used for ducts. A blower door or duct testing fan is used to pressurize the unit to about 100Pa and multiple aerosol sprayers release a fog of sealant into the unit. As the air with the sealant flows out of leaks, some of the sealant particles attach to the edge of the leak. Over time there is a build-up of sealant and the leak is closed. The sealing takes 45 minutes to a couple of hours and will seal leaks up to 3/8” to 5/8” wide depending on how long you continue sealing. When you add in the pre-sealing of large leaks, unit prep to protect the deposition of sealant on horizontal surfaces, and the clean-up process – the total labor averaged 14 person-hours for new construction units and 22 hours for existing units. However, we expect that would be greatly reduced when contractors are applying the technology and they develop a more streamlined process.
- #43 Overall, the sealing worked incredibly well. The percent reduction ranged from 67% to 94% with an average of 81% and average post ACH50 of about 0.7. The units were 54% to 95% tighter than new code requirement of 3.0 ACH50 (using the total leakage). The tightest unit was 25 cfm50. All of the units were at least 80% tighter than the EPA Energy Star Multifamily High Rise requirement and half of the units met the passive house standard of 0.6ACH50. They did that without even having that as a goal. Energy modeling showed that a reduction in the exterior leakage of 3 to 0.6 ACH50 would result in space heating savings of about 69 therms/yr in Minnesota. However, for new construction it is expected that much of the cost savings will be a reduction in conventional sealing needed to produce tighter units.
- #44 These pictures show some of the leaks that are commonly sealed. You can see the gray sealant deposited around plumbing penetrations. The sealant also does a nice job sealing the small gaps around electric boxes. In fact, one of the real advantages of the aerosol sealing process is the ability to seal diffuse, small gaps that would be too costly to seal manually. While these gaps may seem small, they can add up to a big number.
- #45 For some of the units the sealant pigment was removed and fluorescing dye added so that a black light would show the build-up of sealant. These pictures show the sealant at a floor wall joint were the bottom plate had been caulked and gypcrete poured against the wall. Even in that situation, there was leakage that could be sealed with the aerosol. The picture in the upper left shows sealant around an electric box.
- #46 The sealing was also very effective for almost all of the existing units. The percent reduction ranged from 39% to 89% with an median of 75% and median post ACH50 of 3.2. The modeling showed that depending on the leakage of the existing units, the savings ranged from 60 to 200 therms per year.
- #47 We were focusing on the energy benefits of air sealing. However, there are numerous non-energy benefits for this technology. The process will not only seal leaks to the exterior but also to the interior so the movement of odors and contaminants between units will be decreased. Reducing air leakage is also key to reducing sound transmission – both between units and from the outdoors. Finally, just as aerosol duct sealing is generally more reliable than manual methods, aerosol envelope sealing is more reliable than conventional envelope sealing methods and helps reduce training and quality control process that is necessary for tight envelopes in new construction. There is also potential to save money by eliminating some of the conventional caulking and foaming of leaks. In addition, the aerosol sealing process provides real-time feedback on tightness so that you can decide when the unit is tight enough and a test at the end of the process.
- #48 The final report will be available in the next month or two. We are currently working with WCEC on a DOE Building America project to integrate aerosol sealing into the new home construction process to reduce conventional sealing costs and more reliably produce tighter homes. WCEC is also working on a DoD project to apply the process to larger buildings. Finally, Aeroseal has started to provide this service on a commercial basis and expect to start developing their contractor network by the end of the year.