Comparative Study of Path Loss Models for Wireless Communication in Urban and Sub-urban Environment for Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER) 2015
American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER)
e-ISSN: 2320-0847 p-ISSN : 2320-0936
Volume-4, Issue-11, pp-109-115
www.ajer.org
Research Paper Open Access
w w w . a j e r . o r g Page 109
Comparative Study of Path Loss Models for Wireless
Communication in Urban and Sub-urban Environment for Port
Harcourt, Nigeria.
Akujobi Ekeocha1
, Nosiri Onyebuchi2
and Achumba Ifenyinwa2
1.
Department of Computer Science, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria
2.
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Futo, Owerri, Nigeria
ABSTRACT: The study was based on the comparative analysis of radio propagation models for Global
System for Mobile Communications at 900MHz. Drive test analyses were carried out from two selected terrains
in Rivers State namely GRA Phase II and Aggrey Road classified as urban and suburban areas respectively, to
evaluate the best propagation model for the study area. The data obtained were used to compare the various
prediction models namely; Cost 231, Okumura-Hata and ECC-33. Mean path loss values of 115.16dB for
Okumura-Hata and 117.79dB for COST 231 and 280.88dB for ECC-33 respectively were predicted in the urban
environment. Mean path loss values of 115.16dB, 114.76dB and 314.84dB were predicted by Okumura-Hata,
Cost 231and ECC-33 models respectively in the suburban environment. ECC-33 over estimated path loss and
gave the highest prediction in both environments. Okumura-Hata model showed better performance in urban
while COST 231 performed better in the suburban environment. Okumura-hata and COST 231 models are
recommended for deployment in urban and suburban environments respectively.
Keywords -Path Loss, Propagation Model, Received Signal Strength, Empirical models, wireless
communication
I. INTRODUCTION
Planning has been identified as a key factor before the implementation of designs, and also setting up of wireless
communication systems. One basic requirement for an effective and reliable signal transmission is the
knowledge of the received signal strength and its variability at different distances within the surrounding base
station [1]. The propagation of wireless signals is subject to various propagation mechanisms and heavily
influenced by the environment which results to a reduction in the signal strength. Path loss is described as a
reduction in the transmitted power of an electromagnetic wave as it propagates through space. It is a major
component in the analysis and design of link budget of a communication system. It depends on frequency,
antenna height, receive terminal location relative to obstacles and reflectors, and link distance, among many
other factors [2]. Propagation path loss model prediction plays an important role in the design of cellular
systems to specify key system parameters such as transmission power, frequency and antenna heights [2].
A number of propagation prediction models for mobile radio communication systems have been
developed. However, the selection of the most suitable model for any given geographical region is not a simple
task, but depends on descriptions of terrain and effect of vegetation which vary widely from one place to another
[3]. Propagation models are divided into three groups; the empirical models, semi-deterministic models and
deterministic models [4]. Empirical models which are based on measurement data, statistical properties and few
parameters. Examples of this model category are Okumura model and Hata model. Semi-deterministic models
are based on empirical models and deterministic aspects, examples are the Cost-231 and Walfish-Ikegami.
Deterministic models, these are site-specific, they require enormous number of geometry information about the
city, computational report and more accurate model [4].
This study was aimed at carrying out field measurements to evaluate the received signal strength and
path loss, compare the measured path loss with predicted models for GRA Phase II and Aggrey Road in Port
Harcourt, River State, Nigeria.

II. LITERATURE REVIEW
Over the years, different propagation path loss models have been developed for performance assessment of
wireless communication systems. To achieve high quality of service delivery, various researchers have
undergone research studies on the behaviour of radio wave within different environments under diverse
environmental and geographical conditions. The models derived are specific for the respective environment.
In [5], a study conducted in India, they opined that path loss propagation models may give different
results if used in different environments other than one which they were designed. Different path loss models
were compared with measured field data. The field measurement data were obtained in urban, suburban and
rural environments at 900 MHz and 1800 MHz frequency bands with the help of spectrum analyser. The
analysis showed that ECC–33 and SUI models results performed better in urban areas. In suburban areas, ECC–
33, Standard University Interim (SUI) and COST 231–Hata models showed good performance. Okumura – Hata
and Log – distance models showed better performance in rural areas.
According to [1], they compared empirical models for cellular transmission in River State. In their
study, downlink data was collected at various distances on live Globacom WCDMA network at 2100 MHz
frequency. Result of predictions from three path loss models and the measured path loss were compared and
simulated using MATLAB software. The COST 231 Hata showed better result from the comparison and thus
recommended that an adjustment be made to the Cost 231 Hata model for cellular communication in the area.
According to [6], they developed a statistical path loss model that could be applied in the South South
region of Nigeria. In their work, data was collected from 10 existing microcells operating at 876 MHz in Port
Harcourt. The environment was categorized into urban (Category A) and suburban (Category B).The results
showed that the Path loss increases by 35.5dB and 25.7 dB per decade in the urban (Category A) and suburban
(Category B) areas respectively. Variations in path loss between the measured and predicted values from the
Okumura-Hata model were calculated by finding the Mean Square Errors (MSE) to be 10.7dB and 13.4dB for
urban and suburban terrains respectively. They opined that the comparison between the modified Hata models
and measured values for the two categories showed a better result and thus was effective for use in the study
area.
III. PROPAGATION MODELS
3.1Free Space Path Loss Model
Path loss in free space defines how much strength of signal is lost during propagation from transmitter
to receiver. This model is applied in an environment that is characterized by less or no obstructions to wireless
signal. Free space path loss depends on frequency and distance.
The following equation represents the free space path loss as in [3]:
(1)
Where,
f: Frequency (MHz)
d: T-R separation (m)
3.2Okumura-Hata Model
Hata model is expressed as a mathematical formulation to mitigate the best fit of the graphical data
provided by the classical Okumura model. Hata model is used for the frequency range of 150 MHz to 1500
MHz to predict the median path loss for the distance d from transmitter to receiver antenna in 20 km range and
height of transmitting antenna is considered 30 m to 200 m and receiver antenna height is 1 m to 10 m. The
model is represented in equation 2 as given by [4]:
(2)
Where,
C =
= carrier frequency
= transmitter antenna height in meter

= receiver height in meter
d = transmitter-receiver distance in km
a( ) = mobile station antenna height correction factor
3.3COST 231 Hata Model
The COST 231 Hata model was developed as an extension to Hata-Okumura model. This model
operates in the frequency range from 500MHz to 2GHz, applied in the prediction of path loss for three different
environments like urban, suburban and rural. It consists of a correction factor for these three environments. The
path loss equation for this model can be expressed as [6]:
(3)
C= 0 or 3dB, for suburban areas and metropolitan cities
= Transmitting Antenna height in meter
,
for suburban environment
= mobile station antenna height correction factor
Carrier frequency in MHz
= Transmitter-receiver separation distance in km
= Receiver antenna height in meter
3.4ECC-33 Model
The ECC-33 model formulation is based on original measurements from Okumura model. The model is
most widely used in large and medium size cities, areas having crowded and tall buildings. The operation range
of this model is up to 3000MHz and distance range from 1 to 100 km. The model is expressed as [9]:
(4)
Where,
[dB]= free space attenuation
[dB] =basic median path loss
=Transmitter antenna height gain factor
=Receiver antenna height gain factor
Further expressed as,
IV. MATERIALS AND METHOD
4.1 Description of the Propagation Terrain
The study area is located in the River State, with coordinates (04˚48΄
54˝ N, 06˚
59΄
.52˝
E) and (04˚ 45̀
.06˝
N, 07˚
02̀
.24˝
E). The area under study was categorized as suburban and urban environment with narrow
streets, trees and moderately high buildings.
4.2 Data Collection Process
A drive test was conducted within the study area; GRA phase II and Aggrey road, Nigeria with a
vehicle driven along predefined routes. The drive test survey routes follow the design from a cell reference. The
cell reference is a telecommunication road map which shows drive test routes to cover antenna sectors.
Transmission Evaluation and Monitoring System (TEMS) Investigation software was used on a laptop with a
Global Positioning System (BU353) and a TEMS Mobile Station (Sony Ericsson w995) connected through
Universal Serial Board (USB) ports. The personal computer serves as the communication hub for all equipment
in the system. The Global Positioning Satellites (GPS) provides the location tracking for the system during data
collection. This enables the system to determine the position of the Mobile Station (MS) on a global map which
is already installed on the laptop. The MS was used to initiate calls during data collection process. While driving
was going on, the handset was configured to automatically make calls to a fixed destination number. Each call
lasted for 1minute hold time and the call was dropped. The phone remained idle for some period of time then

another call was made. The collected data was saved in Log file format for further processing,Actix Analyser
was used for the post processing.
4.3 Drive Test Survey Route
The drive test survey route was carefully planned with the aid of a cell reference (cell ref) such that the
measurement collection process involved base stations sited within an area marked for investigation. The survey
route was also indicated on the map to aid accessibility of the drive test vehicle to the active sector of the base
station in consideration. The distance covered was ensured to be long enough to allow the noise level of the
receiver to be reached. The routes covered in this study were GRA phase II and Aggrey road. These routes were
chosen based on their uniqueness in order to represent the features of these cities. Fig 1.0 Showed the TEMS
view of the drive test routes.
Figure 1: View of drive test routes
V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The path loss values from the three existing models are presented using equation (2), (3), (4) and were compared
with the field measured values and their results displayed in figs 2 and 3.
Table 1: Network Parameters for Urban and Sub-urban
Par:ameters Values
Frequency 900MHz
Transmitting Antenna Height 40m
Receiving Antenna Height 1.5m
Table 2: Empirical and Measured Path loss values for Urban Environment
Distance
(km)
ECC-
33(dB)
COST-231
(dB)
OKUMURA-HATA
(dB)
MEASURED
(dB)
0.1 262.65 93.00 90.27 100
0.2 269.55 103.30 100.63 106
0.3 273.93 109.30 106.67 104
0.4 277.19 113.61 110.97 120
0.5 279.81 116.90 114.31 158
0.6 282.00 119.67 117.03 158
0.7 283.90 121.97 119.34 158
0.8 285.57 123.96 121.33 113
0.9 287.07 125.72 123.09 112
1.0 288.42 127.30 124.67 128
1.1 289.66 128.72 126.08 135
1.2 290.81 130.02 127.39 136

DISTANCE
Pathloss(dB)
1.21.00.80.60.40.20.0
300
250
200
150
100
Variable
COST 231
MEASURED
OK HATA
ECC 33
Comparative of OK HATA, ECC 33, COST 231, MEASURED vs DISTANCE
Figure 2: Comparison between predicted and measured Path loss in an urban environment
The prediction results of empirical propagation models employed in this study are represented graphically. The
values of the predicted Path loss and the field measured data were plotted against the distance of separation
between the Base Station (BS) antenna and the Mobile Station (MS) antenna. Fig 2.0 showed the result of Path
loss prediction from Okumura-Hata, COST 231, ECC-33 and the measured Path loss from the urban
propagation environment. The result of the drive test carried out within the coverage area of the cell reported a
mean RSS of -83dBm. Mean measured Path loss values of 115.16dB, 117.79dB and 280.88dB were predicted
by Okumura-Hata, COST 231-Hata and ECC-33 Models respectively. COST 231 and Okumura-Hata models
showed some level of similarity with slight difference. The ECC-33 model predictions were high compared to
Okumura-Hata and Cost 231. The high Path loss prediction recorded from ECC-33 clearly showed that the
environment of study needs to be considered in the siting of GSM base stations. The measured Path loss showed
some level of fluctuations resulting from obstructions of physical structures within the environment or topology.
The COST 231 Hata model was chosen for the optimization of this environment.
Table 3: Empirical and Measured Path loss values for Suburban Environment
Distance (km) ECC
33(dB)
COST 231 (dB) OKUMURA HATA
(dB)
MEASURED
(dB)
0.1 296.60 89.88 90.27 111
0.2 303.51 100.25 100.63 113
0.3 307.89 106.31 106.69 114
0.4 311.15 110.61 110.99 131
0.5 313.77 113.95 114.32 116
0.6 315.96 116.67 117.04 158
0.7 317.86 118.97 119.35 140
0.8 319.53 120.97 121.34 158
0.9 321.02 122.73 123.10 152
1.0 322.38 124.30 124.68 128
1.1 323.62 125.71 126.10 141
1.2 324.77 127.03 127.40 124

Distance (km)
Pathloss(dB)
1.21.00.80.60.40.20.0
350
300
250
200
150
100
Variable
COST 231
MEASURED
OK HATA
ECC 33
Compatative plot of OK HATA, ECC 33, COST 231, MEASURED vs Distance (km)
Figure 3.0: Comparison of Predicted and Measured Path loss in suburban environment
Fig 3.0 showed a plot of the predicted propagation models and measured radio propagation characteristics of the
transmitted signal within the suburban environment. Okumura-Hata, COST 231, and ECC-33 Models predicted
mean Path loss values of 115.16dB, 114.76dB and 314.84dB respectively. The ECC-33 model over predicted
path loss compared to Okumura-Hata and COST 231. The deviations between Okumura-Hata model and COST
231 models can be considered as negligible. The mean Received Signal Strength (RSS) obtained from the
propagation environment within the radio coverage of the cell was -79.39 dBm.
Table 4: Measured Received Signal Strength for Urban Environment
S/N Measured RSS (Urban) Measured RSS(Suburban)
1 -67 -65
2 -73 -66
3 -71 -64
4 -83 -67
5 -77 -67
6 -91 -66
7 -81 -66
8 -80 -69
9 -79 -74
10 -95 -76
11 -102 -77
12 -103 -78

Figure 4.0: RSS plots in urban and suburban environment
Fig 4.0 represented a plot of the (RSS) in the suburban environment. There is a gradual degradation of the signal
strength as compared to the urban environment. In the urban plot, the existence of signal fluctuations indicates
obstructions encountered along the signal path. These obstructions are high rise buildings in close proximity, as
well as trees sandwiched between houses within the environment. These obstructions account for call drops,
cross talk, and loss of signal experienced in the study area.
VI. CONCLUSION
In this research, the received signal strength and path loss of a mobile communication system was measured in
an urban and suburban environment respectively. The predicted Path loss was compared with measured data
using a graphical representation, the performance of all models were analysed and it was shown that Cost 231
and Okumura-Hata models showed considerable performance and could be adjusted for better performance. It
can be said that the performance of radio propagation models are environment dependent. Thus, the influence of
environmental factors must be emphasised and properly accounted for when considering base station sites.
Therefore, one of the best possible ways of obtaining a better radio channel characteristics is to optimize the
existing path loss models based on measured data collected from a specific area.
REFERENCES
[1] Akinwole B.O.H, and Biebuma J.J, “Comparative Analysis of Empirical Path Loss Model for Cellular Transmission in Rivers
State”, American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER). ISSN 2320-0936, Volume 02, Issue- 08, PP 24 – 31, 2013.
[2] Nwalozie Gerald .C, Ufoaroh S.U, Ezeagwu C.O, Ejiofor A.C, “Path Loss Prediction for Gsm Mobile Networks for Urban
Region of Aba, South-East Nigeria”.International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, Vol.3 Issue.2, PP. 267-
281, 2014.
[3] PranjaliRaturi, Vishal Gupta, SamreenEram , “Proposed Propagation Model for Dehradun Region” International Journal of Soft
Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), ISSN: 2231-2307 Volume 3, Issue 6, 2014.
[4] Mardeni, R and Kwan K.F, “Optimization of Hata Propagation model of Sub-Urban Area in Malaysia”, Progress in
Electromagnetic Research C, Vol 13, 91 – 106, 2010.
[5] SharmaP.K and R.K. Singh, “Comparative Analysis of Propagation Path Loss Models with Field Measured Data”.International
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 2(6), 2014.
[6] Ubom, E.A, Idigo V.E, Azubogu A.C, Ohaneme C.O. and Alumona T.L (2011). “Path loss Characterization of Wireless
Propagation for South - South Region ofNigeria”. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, Vol.3, No3. PP
360-364.
[7] Ujjawalbahuguna, Bhagirathi Pradhan (2014), “A Review on Path Loss Models for Suburban Regions Using Fuzzy Logic”
International Journal of Computer Engineering & Science(IJCES).ISSN: 2231–6590, 2014
[8] Ogbulezie J.C, M.U. Onuu, J.O. Ushie, B.E. Usibe,“Propagation Models for GSM 900 and GSM 1800MHz for Port Harcourt
and Enugu, Nigeria”, Network and Communication Technologies; vol. 2, No. 2, 2013.PP 1–10.
[9] KumariManju, YadavTilotma and PoojaYadav, “Comparative Study of Path loss Models in different Environments”.
International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST), Vol. 3 No. 4 April 2011.

Comparative Study of Path Loss Models for Wireless Communication in Urban and Sub-urban Environment for Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to Comparative Study of Path Loss Models for Wireless Communication in Urban and Sub-urban Environment for Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

More from Onyebuchi nosiri

Recently uploaded

Comparative Study of Path Loss Models for Wireless Communication in Urban and Sub-urban Environment for Port Harcourt, Nigeria.