Concrete Shallow Foundation
Final Report on the Design of a
Fire Testing & Research Facility
Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario
121
Column Concrete Foundation
The Foundation analysis is based upon supporting a W360x51 column with loads of
Mf=23.5kNm and Axial Load of 200kN. As a note before reviewing the analysis the pedestal and
footing dimension in this analysis have often been resisted by dimension as a possess to loads;
for example, the pedestal is restricted to greater than 450x450 to support a base plate from the
W360x51 Column.
fc
’
= 25MPa (Same as concrete tower, recommend ordering with the concrete for the
tower)
Fy= 400MPa amax= 20mm
Depth 2.4m is frost depth with heated
floor
= 0.65 Cl 8.4.2
Pf= 199kN 200kN = 1 Cl 8.6.5(a)
Mf= 23.5kN
pp= 0.015 starting Reinforcment
Pedistal
1) Design of Pedestal
The Width of pedestal is based upon supporting the Steel Column and Base Plate. The
preliminary base plate design was 450x450, so to support the Plate Pedestal and allow for some
revision in plate design the pedestal will be 500x500.
Is the Pedestal Actually a Pedestal or Small Column
for design? Cl 2.2
Therefore the pedestal will be designed as a small
Column.
Check Bearing from Plate to Concrete
Cl 10.8.1
Table 7.1.1 To Verify Preliminary Sizing of 500x500
Final Report on the Design of a
Fire Testing & Research Facility
Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario
122
The Minimum Column Size is 250x250. The size
500x500 is adquete and required due to Steel Base
Plate.
Range of Reinforcement Permitted
Min Reinforcement Cl 10.9.1
Max Reinforcement Cl 10.9.2
As a result reinforcement ration needs to be in
Cover is Determine as Concrete cover is 75mm (permanently exposed to earth)
Spacing Between Centerline of Vert Bars, Use 25m Vert. 10M Ties
Column Interaction Diagram Table 7.4.1 Reinforcement On Each Face
Interaction Diagram Falls Under . The significance of this is that the concrete is will be
sufficient to carry the Load. This is the expected out come as the Column Size double the min
sizing.
Though the reinforcement Ration Can be decreased to 0.01 the prelimary 0.015 will be retained
as it allows for even reinforcement.
Area of Steel Required And Number of Bars
Ar
Rounded up from 5 bars to 8 to allow for even reinforcement.
Area of Steel Required
Use 8 25 – 3 Bars each Face.
Area of Steel Used Is Roughly Equal, but there is less bars to install.
Final Report on the Design of a
Fire Testing & Research Facility
Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario
123
Spacing Between Vert Bars
Min Spacing
Min Spacing between Vert. Bars is 28mm and is Satisfied.
Design Ties Cl 7.6.5
Minimum Tie Diameter Cl 7.6.5.1
Spacing of Ties Cl 7.6.5.2
Spacing 400mm Govern
Is additional Lateral Support Required? Cl 7.6.5.5
The Clear Spacing Between bars is 127.5mm < 150mm,
.:. No additional lateral Support Required
Development Length of Bars if They ever went into Tension Cl 12.2.3
Spacing Above Footing Cl 7.6.5.3
Tie Spacing Above Footing is
Final Report on the Design of a
Fire Testing & Research Facility
Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario
124
Summary:
Verti Bars 8 28M ld=900mm
Ties 10M @ 400 h=1830
Ties 200 Above Footing Dimension: 500x500
Footing: Spread Footing
During the Preliminary Calculations, not shown, it was discovered that most of the footings
dimensions were governed by geometry requirements more than loading.
Development Length For Horizontal Flexural Reinforcement
Dimension of Base to Permit 900mm footing
Round Up the Base Dimension to 1200mm
Minimum Depth of Footing Cl 15.7
Depth Above bottom of footing Greater than 150mm and cover to be 75mm
Soil Pressure and Footing Area
qult=480kPa based upon Width of 1.2m and Depth 2.4m
Note width of 0.9m qmax=440kPa but 0.9m does not have enough Development length
Final Report on the Design of a
Fire Testing & Research Facility
Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario
125
Soil ULS From Exp. “Lakehead University Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Fire Lab and
Services”
Table 2A. ULS and SLS Values for SQUARE Footings
Factored ULS Bearing Resistance for Square Footings
(kPa), with Depth (m)
Footing Width (m) 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.4
0.6 400 370 360 410 460 520
0.9 320 360 350 390 430 500
1.2 290 330 350 370 410 480
1.5 270 310 330 380 400 470
1.8 260 300 320 360 410 470

More Related Content

PPT
10 Reinforced concrete design
DOCX
PROJECT
PPT
case study on plat load test
PDF
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
PDF
Numerical modelling of concrete-filled steel tubular members in OpenSees
PDF
IRJET- Cost Analysis of Two-Way Slab and Post Tension Slab
PDF
07 a82101 advanced structural design
PPTX
BriefTHE EFFECT OF CREATED OPENING UNDER WORKING LOAD
10 Reinforced concrete design
PROJECT
case study on plat load test
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
Numerical modelling of concrete-filled steel tubular members in OpenSees
IRJET- Cost Analysis of Two-Way Slab and Post Tension Slab
07 a82101 advanced structural design
BriefTHE EFFECT OF CREATED OPENING UNDER WORKING LOAD

What's hot (19)

PPTX
Vertical vessel loading calculation
PPTX
Horizontal Vessel Loading Calculation
PDF
Experimental Study of Axially Loaded RC Short Columns Strengthened With Basal...
PPT
Effective Width in Shear of Reinforced Concrete Solid Slab Bridges under Whee...
PDF
Te assignment by hemant (1)
PPT
Practical Application of Transverse Load Redistribution in Reinforced Concret...
PPTX
Pile load test ppt
PPTX
Understanding Stress Analysis Topics
PPTX
Sub.ass.2
PDF
Evaluation of rigid pavements by deflection approach
PDF
Senior Design Progress Report
PDF
Ijciet 06 10_002
PPTX
footing design
PPTX
LIVE LOAD DISTRIBUTION FACTORS FOR CONCRETE BRIDGES SUITABLE FOR ECP 201 AND...
PPTX
Shear tests of reinforced concrete slabs and slab strips under concentrated l...
PPT
Combined footings
PDF
Aerodynamic stability of long span bridges
PDF
Benefit Concrete
PDF
Chimney design &amp;engg code
Vertical vessel loading calculation
Horizontal Vessel Loading Calculation
Experimental Study of Axially Loaded RC Short Columns Strengthened With Basal...
Effective Width in Shear of Reinforced Concrete Solid Slab Bridges under Whee...
Te assignment by hemant (1)
Practical Application of Transverse Load Redistribution in Reinforced Concret...
Pile load test ppt
Understanding Stress Analysis Topics
Sub.ass.2
Evaluation of rigid pavements by deflection approach
Senior Design Progress Report
Ijciet 06 10_002
footing design
LIVE LOAD DISTRIBUTION FACTORS FOR CONCRETE BRIDGES SUITABLE FOR ECP 201 AND...
Shear tests of reinforced concrete slabs and slab strips under concentrated l...
Combined footings
Aerodynamic stability of long span bridges
Benefit Concrete
Chimney design &amp;engg code
Ad

Viewers also liked (9)

PPTX
Slideshare ppt
PDF
Shallow and Deep Founation Design Calucations
PDF
Two-Way Floor Slab
PPT
PPTX
Technical Presentation on Foundation Design
PPTX
Axially loaded columns
PPTX
BIAXIAL COLUMN DESIGN
PDF
Design of One-Way Slab
PDF
Bms system basic
Slideshare ppt
Shallow and Deep Founation Design Calucations
Two-Way Floor Slab
Technical Presentation on Foundation Design
Axially loaded columns
BIAXIAL COLUMN DESIGN
Design of One-Way Slab
Bms system basic
Ad

Similar to Concrete Shallow Foundation (20)

PPTX
Steel fiber reinforced concrete
PPTX
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON THIN STEEL PLAIN AND SLOTTED CHANNEL SECTTONS
PPT
analysisand designof rccslabsfor varioususes.ppt
PDF
PS18_P176_V.Greepala.pdf
DOCX
Dss ready
PPT
Perhitungan sturktur kolom baja 6162 (4).ppt
PPTX
D1 (A3) Viktor Peterson - Evaluation of dynamically tested concrete beams rei...
PPTX
Seismic response of steel beams coupling concrete walls
PDF
haug.pdf
PDF
Behavior Of Castellated Composite Beam Subjected To Cyclic Loads
PPTX
Design of column base plates anchor bolt
PPTX
DOCX
Impact of new codes in silos design
PPT
BORED pile and pile cap design.ppt
PPTX
unit-4 design drawing of steel stru.pptx
PPTX
Design of short columns using helical reinforcement
PPTX
Chintan Dp2.pptx
PPT
Design and analysis of RC structures with flat slab
PPTX
Lecture-7-Detailing-PHG-A1-Rev-10-2-Nov-16-Print.pptx
PDF
Comparative Study of Pre-Engineered and Conventional Steel Frames for Differe...
Steel fiber reinforced concrete
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON THIN STEEL PLAIN AND SLOTTED CHANNEL SECTTONS
analysisand designof rccslabsfor varioususes.ppt
PS18_P176_V.Greepala.pdf
Dss ready
Perhitungan sturktur kolom baja 6162 (4).ppt
D1 (A3) Viktor Peterson - Evaluation of dynamically tested concrete beams rei...
Seismic response of steel beams coupling concrete walls
haug.pdf
Behavior Of Castellated Composite Beam Subjected To Cyclic Loads
Design of column base plates anchor bolt
Impact of new codes in silos design
BORED pile and pile cap design.ppt
unit-4 design drawing of steel stru.pptx
Design of short columns using helical reinforcement
Chintan Dp2.pptx
Design and analysis of RC structures with flat slab
Lecture-7-Detailing-PHG-A1-Rev-10-2-Nov-16-Print.pptx
Comparative Study of Pre-Engineered and Conventional Steel Frames for Differe...

Concrete Shallow Foundation

  • 2. Final Report on the Design of a Fire Testing & Research Facility Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario 121 Column Concrete Foundation The Foundation analysis is based upon supporting a W360x51 column with loads of Mf=23.5kNm and Axial Load of 200kN. As a note before reviewing the analysis the pedestal and footing dimension in this analysis have often been resisted by dimension as a possess to loads; for example, the pedestal is restricted to greater than 450x450 to support a base plate from the W360x51 Column. fc ’ = 25MPa (Same as concrete tower, recommend ordering with the concrete for the tower) Fy= 400MPa amax= 20mm Depth 2.4m is frost depth with heated floor = 0.65 Cl 8.4.2 Pf= 199kN 200kN = 1 Cl 8.6.5(a) Mf= 23.5kN pp= 0.015 starting Reinforcment Pedistal 1) Design of Pedestal The Width of pedestal is based upon supporting the Steel Column and Base Plate. The preliminary base plate design was 450x450, so to support the Plate Pedestal and allow for some revision in plate design the pedestal will be 500x500. Is the Pedestal Actually a Pedestal or Small Column for design? Cl 2.2 Therefore the pedestal will be designed as a small Column. Check Bearing from Plate to Concrete Cl 10.8.1 Table 7.1.1 To Verify Preliminary Sizing of 500x500
  • 3. Final Report on the Design of a Fire Testing & Research Facility Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario 122 The Minimum Column Size is 250x250. The size 500x500 is adquete and required due to Steel Base Plate. Range of Reinforcement Permitted Min Reinforcement Cl 10.9.1 Max Reinforcement Cl 10.9.2 As a result reinforcement ration needs to be in Cover is Determine as Concrete cover is 75mm (permanently exposed to earth) Spacing Between Centerline of Vert Bars, Use 25m Vert. 10M Ties Column Interaction Diagram Table 7.4.1 Reinforcement On Each Face Interaction Diagram Falls Under . The significance of this is that the concrete is will be sufficient to carry the Load. This is the expected out come as the Column Size double the min sizing. Though the reinforcement Ration Can be decreased to 0.01 the prelimary 0.015 will be retained as it allows for even reinforcement. Area of Steel Required And Number of Bars Ar Rounded up from 5 bars to 8 to allow for even reinforcement. Area of Steel Required Use 8 25 – 3 Bars each Face. Area of Steel Used Is Roughly Equal, but there is less bars to install.
  • 4. Final Report on the Design of a Fire Testing & Research Facility Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario 123 Spacing Between Vert Bars Min Spacing Min Spacing between Vert. Bars is 28mm and is Satisfied. Design Ties Cl 7.6.5 Minimum Tie Diameter Cl 7.6.5.1 Spacing of Ties Cl 7.6.5.2 Spacing 400mm Govern Is additional Lateral Support Required? Cl 7.6.5.5 The Clear Spacing Between bars is 127.5mm < 150mm, .:. No additional lateral Support Required Development Length of Bars if They ever went into Tension Cl 12.2.3 Spacing Above Footing Cl 7.6.5.3 Tie Spacing Above Footing is
  • 5. Final Report on the Design of a Fire Testing & Research Facility Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario 124 Summary: Verti Bars 8 28M ld=900mm Ties 10M @ 400 h=1830 Ties 200 Above Footing Dimension: 500x500 Footing: Spread Footing During the Preliminary Calculations, not shown, it was discovered that most of the footings dimensions were governed by geometry requirements more than loading. Development Length For Horizontal Flexural Reinforcement Dimension of Base to Permit 900mm footing Round Up the Base Dimension to 1200mm Minimum Depth of Footing Cl 15.7 Depth Above bottom of footing Greater than 150mm and cover to be 75mm Soil Pressure and Footing Area qult=480kPa based upon Width of 1.2m and Depth 2.4m Note width of 0.9m qmax=440kPa but 0.9m does not have enough Development length
  • 6. Final Report on the Design of a Fire Testing & Research Facility Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario 125 Soil ULS From Exp. “Lakehead University Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Fire Lab and Services” Table 2A. ULS and SLS Values for SQUARE Footings Factored ULS Bearing Resistance for Square Footings (kPa), with Depth (m) Footing Width (m) 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.4 0.6 400 370 360 410 460 520 0.9 320 360 350 390 430 500 1.2 290 330 350 370 410 480 1.5 270 310 330 380 400 470 1.8 260 300 320 360 410 470