Conversation and preference structure
Conversation and
Preference Structure
Presented by:
Asif Ali Raza
asifalirazzza@yahoo.com
+92-300-4-62-62-34
• Interaction
• Conversation
• Conversation Analysis
• Terms regarding Conversation Analysis
• Pauses, overlaps, and backchannels
• Conversational style
• Adjacency pairs
• Preference structure
• Summary
Contents
Term INTERACTION could actually apply to a very large number
of quite different social encounters.
Different Social Encounters
• A teacher talking to students
• A doctor talking to a patient in a clinic
• Individuals taking part in courtroom proceedings, attending
meeting, buying stamps at the post office
• And dozens of other different experiences
Interaction
This kind of talk is likely to differ according to the different contexts of
interaction.
• The basic pattern of ‘I speak – you speak – I speak –
you speak’ is called conversation structure.
• We drive this structure from that fundamental kind of
interaction we acquire first and use most often.
Conversation Structure
There are many metaphors used to describe conversation
structure.
• For some; conversation is like a dance, with
conversational partners coordinating their movements
smoothly
• For others; conversation is like traffic crossing an
intersection, involving lots of alternating movements
without any crashes.
Conversation Analysis
The most widely used approach is based not on dancing, nor on
traffic flow but on an analogy with the workings of a market
economy.
• Floor –the right to speak (a scarce commodity)
• Turn – having control of this floor at any time
• Turn-taking – In any situation where control is not
fixed in advance, any one can attempt to get control.
• Local Management System – set of conventions for
getting, keeping and giving away turns
• Transition Relevance Place (TRP) – Any possible
change-of-turn point
Specific words used for this analogy
Market Economy Metaphor (Cont.)
• The speakers accomplish change of turn smoothly because
they are aware of the local management system for taking
those turns at an appropriate TRP.
This metaphor can be applied to:
• Where speakers cooperate and share the floor equally.
• Also where speakers compete for keeping the floor,
preventing others from getting it.
Conversations typically consist of two or more participants
taking turns, and only one participant speaking at any time.
Smooth transitions from one speaker to the next are valued.
• Transitions with a long silence between turns
• Or significant overlap (both speakers trying to speak at
the same time)
Pauses and Overlaps
‘are perceived as awkward’
When two people attempt to have a conversation and discover that
there is no ‘flow’, or smooth rhythm to their transition, much more
is being communicated than is said. There is a sense of distance,
an absence of familiarity, or ease. Following is an interaction
between a student and his friend’s father during their first meeting:
Pauses and Overlaps (Cont.)
Mr. Strait: What's your major, Dave?
Dave: English—well, I haven't really decided yet.
(3 seconds silence)
Mr. Strait: So—you want to be a teacher?
Dave: No—not really—well not if I can help it.
(2.5 seconds silence)
Mr. Strait: Wha—//Where do you— go
ahead
Dave: I mean it's a—oh, sorry //I
em—
• — are short pauses and show hesitations
• Long pauses become silences. Silences in the previous
slide are not attributed to either speaker because each
has completed a turn.
• // used at the beginning of the overlapping talk.
Pauses and Overlaps (Cont.)
• If one speaker actually turns over the floor to another and
the other does not speak, then the silence is attributed to
the second speakers and become significance. It’s an
attributable silence.
• In the following interaction, the non-response of Dave is
treated, by his girlfriend, as possibly communicating
something:
Pauses and Overlaps (Cont.)
Jan: Dave, I'm going to the store.
(2 seconds)
Jan: Dave?
(2 seconds)
Jan: Dave – is something wrong?
Dave: What? What's wrong?
Jan: Never mind.
3-Apart from the basic overlap, sometimes younger
speakers overlapped talk appears to function like an
expression of solidarity or closeness opining about
similar things.
Pauses and Overlaps (Cont.)
Min: Did you see him in the video?
Wendy: Yeah - the part on the beach
Min: Oh my God // he was so lovely
Wendy // he was just being so cool
Min: And all the waves // crashing around
him!
Wendy: // yeah that was really wild.
4-Overlap can also communicate competition.
Joe: When they were in // power las-- wait CAN I
FINISH?
Jerry: // that's my point I said --
The point of overlap is treated as an interruption
and the first speaker actually has to make a
comment about procedure, i.e., appeals to an
unstated rule of conversation structure, namely
that each potential speaker is expected to wait
until the current speaker reaches a TRP.
Markers of TRPs: - end of a structural unit
(phrase/clause)
- pause
Pauses and Overlaps (Cont.)
5-A speaker who wants to keep holding the floor will
avoid providing TRPs, i.e. avoiding open pauses at the
end of syntactic units and places fillers/breaths in the
middle, not at the end of those units.
• I wasn't talking about—um his first book
that was—uh really just like a start and so—
uh isn't—doesn't count really.
Pauses and Overlaps (Cont.)
Pauses and Overlaps (Cont.)
6- Another floor holding device is to indicate that there is
a larger structure to your turn.
a. There are three points I'd like to make—first ...
b. There's more than one way to do this—one example
would be...
c. Didn't you know about Melvin?—Oh, it was last
October ...
d. Did you hear about Cindy's new car?—She got it in ...
a/b technical information about coming
structure
c/d preludes to storytelling
Speakers expect their conversational partners to
indicate that they are listening. Nodding, smiling, other
facial expressions, gestures, vocal indications are
called backchannel signals
Backchannel
Caller: If you use your long distance service a lot then
you'll …
Mary: // uh-huh
Caller: be interested in the discount I'm talking about
because …
Mary: // yeah
Caller: it can only save you money to switch to a cheaper
service
Mary: // mmm
Backchannel (Cont.)
• Backchannel signals provide feedback to the speaker
that the message is being received, they indicate that the
listener is following and not objecting.
• The absence of backchannels is interpreted as significant
(in telephone conversations the speaker is prompted
to ask whether the speaker is still there).
• In face-to-face conversations the absence of
backchannels may be interpreted as a way of withholding
agreement.
There are individual and cultural differences in conversational
style/turn taking
Conversation Style
High Involvement Style—some individuals expect that
participation in a conversation will be very active, that speaking
rate will be relatively fast, with almost no pausing between
turns, and with some overlap or even competition between
turns.
High Considerateness Style—such speakers use a slower rate,
expect longer pauses between turns, do not overlap and avoid
interruption or completion of the other's turn.
Style clashes lead a conversation to be one-
sided.
Conversation Style (Cont.)
• the faster speaker may think the slower one doesn't
have much to say, is shy, perhaps boring or stupid
• the slower speaker may view the faster one as noisy,
pushy, domineering, selfish and tiresome
features of conversational style are often interpreted as
personality traits
Adjacency Pairs
Almost automatic patterns in the structure of conversation
(as given below), e.g., in greetings and good-byes are
called adjacency pairs.
Examples:
Anna: Hello! Bill: Hi!
Anna: How are you? Bill: Fine.
Anna: See ya! Bill: Bye!
Adjacency Pairs (Cont.)
• These automatic sequences are called adjacency pairs
• They always consist of a first and second part
produced by different speakers.
• The utterance of the first part immediately creates an
expectation of the utterance of a second part of the
pair.
• Failure to produce the second part will be treated as a
significant and hence meaningful.
Adjacency Pairs (Cont.)
First Part Second Part
A: What's up? B: Nothin'
much
A: How's it goin'? B: Jus' hangin' in
there
A: How are things? B: The usual
A: How ya doin' B: Can't complain
A lot of internal variation is
possible:
For example: opening of
conversation.
Adjacency Pairs (Cont.)
First Part Second Part
A: What time is it? B: About eight-thirty
A: Thanks. B: You're welcome
A: Could you help me with this? B: Sure
Example: question - answer sequence in [1]
Example: thanking - response sequence in [2]
Example: request - accept sequence in [3]
Adjacency Pairs (Cont.)
Agent: Do you want the early flight? (=
Q1)
Client: What time does it arrive? (= Q2)
Agent: Nine forty-five (=
A2)
Client: Yeah - that's great (= A1)
Insertion sequences can intervene between adjacency
pairs:
Form Q1 - Q2 - A2 - A1 (one adjacency pair within
another)
Jean: Could you mail this letter for me? (Req. 1)
Fred: Does it have a stamp on? (Q2)
Jean: Yeah. (A2)
Fred: Okay (Acc. 1)
Mix of different sequences possible:
Adjacency Pairs (Cont.)
Opening Sections (Summons-Answer Sequences):
First utterance is a summons, the second utterance an
answer to the summons, establishing an open channel
for talk (three part structure).
Child: Mommy? (Summons)
Mum: Yes, dear. (Answer)
Child: Can I have chocolate? (Reason for
summons)
Examples:
Adjacency Pairs (Cont.)
Closing Sections:The closure of any topic after the first
one makes the introduction of a closing section
imminent
• closings placed in such a way that no party is
forced to exit while still having compelling things
to say
• hasty or slow terminations carry unwelcome
inferences about the relationships between the
speakers
Adjacency Pairs (Cont.)
B: Okay, so that would be in St. Jude’s wouldn’t it?
A: Yes
B: Okay so …
A: One o’clock in the bar closing implicative topic (arrangement)
B: Okay
A: Okay? one or more pairs of passing turns with
B: Okay then thanks very much indeed George – pre-closing
items (okay, alright, so …)
A: - Alright
B: //See you there
A: //See you there
B: Okay
A: Okay // bye terminal elements
B: // bye
Examples:
• adjacency pairs represent social actions, and not all
social actions are equal when they occur as second
parts of some pairs, e.g., a first part request expects
an acceptance.
• acceptance is structurally more likely than refusal and
Structural likelihood is called preference
Preference Structures
Preference structure divides second parts into
PREFERRED and DISPREFERRED social acts
First part
Preference Structures
Second part
Preferred Dispreferre
d
Assessment Isn't that really great? agree Yes, it is
disagree
Invitation Why not join us tonight? accept I’d love to refuse
offer Want some coffee? accept Yes, please
decline
proposal Maybe we could go for a walk. agree That'd be great
disagree
request Can you help me? accept Sure
refuse
Silence is also always a dispreferred response, often
leading to a revision of the first part. (Non-response
communicates that the speaker is not in a position to
provide the preferred response)
Preference Structure (Cont.)
Sandy: But I'm sure they'll have good food
there
(1.6 seconds)
Sandy: Hmm—I guess the food isn't great
Jack: Nah—people mostly go for the music
Silence is risky as it may give the impression of non-participation in the
conversational
Structure. Speakers often signal that they are producing the marked,
dispreferred structure
Aassessment:
Preference Structure (Cont.)
Cindy: So chiropodists do hands I guess
Julie: Em - well - out there - they they mostly work
on people's feet
- initial hesitation: delay (em + pause)
- preface: well
- appeal to the views of others: out there
- stumbling repetition: they they
- relativizing statement/mitigation: mostly
Invitation:
Preference Structure (Cont.)
Becky: Come over for some coffee later
Wally: Oh - eh - I'd love to - but you see - I - I'm
supposed to get this finished - you know
- hesitation: oh - eh
- preface: I'd love to (token acceptance)
- stumbling repetition: I - I'm
- account: I'm supposed to get this finished
- invocation of understanding: but you see, you
know
How to do a dispreferred second part?
Preference Structure (Cont.)
delay/hesitate pause; er; em; ah
preface well; oh
express doubt I'm not sure; I don't know
token acceptance that's great; I'd love to
apology I'm sorry; what a pity
mention obligation I must do X; I'm expected in Y
appeal for understanding you see; you know
make it non-personal everbody else; out there
give an account too much work; no
time left
use mitigators really; mostly; sort of; kinda
hedge the negative I guess not; not possible
Preference Structure (Cont.)
• dispreferreds take more time/language/effort
• more language creates more distance between
first and second part
• preferred represents closeness and quick
connection
• participants try to avoid creating contexts for
dispreferreds e.g., by using pre-sequences
Question and Answer Period
Thanks

More Related Content

PPTX
Conversation and preference structure
PPTX
Pragmatics: Conversation and Preference Structure
PPT
Conversation analysis
PDF
Presupposition And Entailment By Dr.Shadia
PPTX
Deixis and distance
PPTX
Multimodal discourse analysis
PPTX
Types of figures of speech
PPTX
Conversation and Preference structure
Conversation and preference structure
Pragmatics: Conversation and Preference Structure
Conversation analysis
Presupposition And Entailment By Dr.Shadia
Deixis and distance
Multimodal discourse analysis
Types of figures of speech
Conversation and Preference structure

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Pragmatic politeness
PDF
Cooperation And Implicature By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
PPTX
CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE
PPTX
Implicature
PPTX
05 cooperation and implicature for students
PDF
Speech Acts And Speech Events, By Dr.Shadia Yousef Banjar.Pptx
PPTX
presupposition-and-entailment
PPTX
07 politeness and interaction for students
PDF
Reference And Inference By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
PPTX
conversation analysis
PPTX
Speech act and speech event
PPTX
Pragmatics presentation presupposition prepared by Mr. Ijaz Ahmed MPhil Schol...
PDF
Politeness And Interaction, By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
PDF
Speech acts and events
PPTX
03 reference and inference
PPTX
Introduction to Discourse analysis
PPT
Pragmatics presupposition and entailnment
PPTX
Deixis presentation
PPT
PRAGMATICS: COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLES
PPTX
Politeness & Interaction
Pragmatic politeness
Cooperation And Implicature By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE
Implicature
05 cooperation and implicature for students
Speech Acts And Speech Events, By Dr.Shadia Yousef Banjar.Pptx
presupposition-and-entailment
07 politeness and interaction for students
Reference And Inference By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
conversation analysis
Speech act and speech event
Pragmatics presentation presupposition prepared by Mr. Ijaz Ahmed MPhil Schol...
Politeness And Interaction, By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
Speech acts and events
03 reference and inference
Introduction to Discourse analysis
Pragmatics presupposition and entailnment
Deixis presentation
PRAGMATICS: COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLES
Politeness & Interaction
Ad

Similar to Conversation and preference structure (20)

PPTX
Conversational analysis
DOCX
Turn taking
PPTX
lecture8 Conversation turn taking.pptx
PPTX
Discourse and conversation
PDF
Pragmatic
PPT
Conversation_Analysis.ppt
PPTX
Presentation pragmatics from doing pragmatics chapter nine talk
PDF
Discourse analysis session 2_12_10_2021 Conversation.pdf
PPTX
Face to Face Communication and Text Based Communication in HCI
DOCX
Portofoliodiscourseanalysisfix 140428225714-phpapp02 (2)
PDF
How to teach speaking
PDF
Discourse Discourse Discourse Discourse.pdf
PPTX
Marriage of speech, vision and natural language processing
DOCX
Discourse Analysis
PPT
Discourse and conversation
PPT
The language of meetings
PDF
How to teach speaking in an efl class ii carolina terry
PDF
How to teach speaking in an efl class ii carolina terry
PPTX
Communication theory
PPT
1606983314-connected-speech.ppt
Conversational analysis
Turn taking
lecture8 Conversation turn taking.pptx
Discourse and conversation
Pragmatic
Conversation_Analysis.ppt
Presentation pragmatics from doing pragmatics chapter nine talk
Discourse analysis session 2_12_10_2021 Conversation.pdf
Face to Face Communication and Text Based Communication in HCI
Portofoliodiscourseanalysisfix 140428225714-phpapp02 (2)
How to teach speaking
Discourse Discourse Discourse Discourse.pdf
Marriage of speech, vision and natural language processing
Discourse Analysis
Discourse and conversation
The language of meetings
How to teach speaking in an efl class ii carolina terry
How to teach speaking in an efl class ii carolina terry
Communication theory
1606983314-connected-speech.ppt
Ad

More from Asif Ali Raza (20)

PDF
Notes of s.st. class vii
PPTX
On what criteria can a syllabus be organized
PPTX
Esp syllabus
PPTX
Approaches to course design
PDF
Recruitment schedule-educators by asif ali raza
PPTX
Evaluation in ESP
PPTX
Noam chomskyan theory
PPTX
Generativism
PPTX
Theory of innateness
PPTX
C command
PPTX
C command works on antecedent
PPTX
C command works on anaphors and reflexives
PPTX
C command on binding
PPTX
Basic terms of tree diagram
PPTX
Tree diagram
PPTX
Structural ambiguity
PPTX
Tree diagram
PPTX
Recursion
PPTX
Phrase structure rules
PPTX
Movement rules
Notes of s.st. class vii
On what criteria can a syllabus be organized
Esp syllabus
Approaches to course design
Recruitment schedule-educators by asif ali raza
Evaluation in ESP
Noam chomskyan theory
Generativism
Theory of innateness
C command
C command works on antecedent
C command works on anaphors and reflexives
C command on binding
Basic terms of tree diagram
Tree diagram
Structural ambiguity
Tree diagram
Recursion
Phrase structure rules
Movement rules

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illnesses (IMNCI) – Unit IV |...
PDF
Comprehensive Lecture on the Appendix.pdf
PDF
plant tissues class 6-7 mcqs chatgpt.pdf
PDF
Climate and Adaptation MCQs class 7 from chatgpt
PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PPTX
Climate Change and Its Global Impact.pptx
PDF
MA in English at Shiv Nadar University – Advanced Literature, Language & Rese...
PPTX
Thinking Routines and Learning Engagements.pptx
PDF
Civil Department's presentation Your score increases as you pick a category
PDF
LEARNERS WITH ADDITIONAL NEEDS ProfEd Topic
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PDF
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2022).pdf
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
PDF
0520_Scheme_of_Work_(for_examination_from_2021).pdf
PPTX
2025 High Blood Pressure Guideline Slide Set.pptx
PPTX
What’s under the hood: Parsing standardized learning content for AI
PDF
Skin Care and Cosmetic Ingredients Dictionary ( PDFDrive ).pdf
PDF
MICROENCAPSULATION_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI Syllabus.pdf
PDF
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2021).pdf
PDF
semiconductor packaging in vlsi design fab
Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illnesses (IMNCI) – Unit IV |...
Comprehensive Lecture on the Appendix.pdf
plant tissues class 6-7 mcqs chatgpt.pdf
Climate and Adaptation MCQs class 7 from chatgpt
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
Climate Change and Its Global Impact.pptx
MA in English at Shiv Nadar University – Advanced Literature, Language & Rese...
Thinking Routines and Learning Engagements.pptx
Civil Department's presentation Your score increases as you pick a category
LEARNERS WITH ADDITIONAL NEEDS ProfEd Topic
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2022).pdf
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
0520_Scheme_of_Work_(for_examination_from_2021).pdf
2025 High Blood Pressure Guideline Slide Set.pptx
What’s under the hood: Parsing standardized learning content for AI
Skin Care and Cosmetic Ingredients Dictionary ( PDFDrive ).pdf
MICROENCAPSULATION_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI Syllabus.pdf
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2021).pdf
semiconductor packaging in vlsi design fab

Conversation and preference structure

  • 3. • Interaction • Conversation • Conversation Analysis • Terms regarding Conversation Analysis • Pauses, overlaps, and backchannels • Conversational style • Adjacency pairs • Preference structure • Summary Contents
  • 4. Term INTERACTION could actually apply to a very large number of quite different social encounters. Different Social Encounters • A teacher talking to students • A doctor talking to a patient in a clinic • Individuals taking part in courtroom proceedings, attending meeting, buying stamps at the post office • And dozens of other different experiences Interaction This kind of talk is likely to differ according to the different contexts of interaction.
  • 5. • The basic pattern of ‘I speak – you speak – I speak – you speak’ is called conversation structure. • We drive this structure from that fundamental kind of interaction we acquire first and use most often. Conversation Structure
  • 6. There are many metaphors used to describe conversation structure. • For some; conversation is like a dance, with conversational partners coordinating their movements smoothly • For others; conversation is like traffic crossing an intersection, involving lots of alternating movements without any crashes. Conversation Analysis The most widely used approach is based not on dancing, nor on traffic flow but on an analogy with the workings of a market economy.
  • 7. • Floor –the right to speak (a scarce commodity) • Turn – having control of this floor at any time • Turn-taking – In any situation where control is not fixed in advance, any one can attempt to get control. • Local Management System – set of conventions for getting, keeping and giving away turns • Transition Relevance Place (TRP) – Any possible change-of-turn point Specific words used for this analogy
  • 8. Market Economy Metaphor (Cont.) • The speakers accomplish change of turn smoothly because they are aware of the local management system for taking those turns at an appropriate TRP. This metaphor can be applied to: • Where speakers cooperate and share the floor equally. • Also where speakers compete for keeping the floor, preventing others from getting it.
  • 9. Conversations typically consist of two or more participants taking turns, and only one participant speaking at any time. Smooth transitions from one speaker to the next are valued. • Transitions with a long silence between turns • Or significant overlap (both speakers trying to speak at the same time) Pauses and Overlaps ‘are perceived as awkward’
  • 10. When two people attempt to have a conversation and discover that there is no ‘flow’, or smooth rhythm to their transition, much more is being communicated than is said. There is a sense of distance, an absence of familiarity, or ease. Following is an interaction between a student and his friend’s father during their first meeting: Pauses and Overlaps (Cont.) Mr. Strait: What's your major, Dave? Dave: English—well, I haven't really decided yet. (3 seconds silence) Mr. Strait: So—you want to be a teacher? Dave: No—not really—well not if I can help it. (2.5 seconds silence) Mr. Strait: Wha—//Where do you— go ahead Dave: I mean it's a—oh, sorry //I em—
  • 11. • — are short pauses and show hesitations • Long pauses become silences. Silences in the previous slide are not attributed to either speaker because each has completed a turn. • // used at the beginning of the overlapping talk. Pauses and Overlaps (Cont.)
  • 12. • If one speaker actually turns over the floor to another and the other does not speak, then the silence is attributed to the second speakers and become significance. It’s an attributable silence. • In the following interaction, the non-response of Dave is treated, by his girlfriend, as possibly communicating something: Pauses and Overlaps (Cont.) Jan: Dave, I'm going to the store. (2 seconds) Jan: Dave? (2 seconds) Jan: Dave – is something wrong? Dave: What? What's wrong? Jan: Never mind.
  • 13. 3-Apart from the basic overlap, sometimes younger speakers overlapped talk appears to function like an expression of solidarity or closeness opining about similar things. Pauses and Overlaps (Cont.) Min: Did you see him in the video? Wendy: Yeah - the part on the beach Min: Oh my God // he was so lovely Wendy // he was just being so cool Min: And all the waves // crashing around him! Wendy: // yeah that was really wild. 4-Overlap can also communicate competition. Joe: When they were in // power las-- wait CAN I FINISH? Jerry: // that's my point I said --
  • 14. The point of overlap is treated as an interruption and the first speaker actually has to make a comment about procedure, i.e., appeals to an unstated rule of conversation structure, namely that each potential speaker is expected to wait until the current speaker reaches a TRP. Markers of TRPs: - end of a structural unit (phrase/clause) - pause Pauses and Overlaps (Cont.)
  • 15. 5-A speaker who wants to keep holding the floor will avoid providing TRPs, i.e. avoiding open pauses at the end of syntactic units and places fillers/breaths in the middle, not at the end of those units. • I wasn't talking about—um his first book that was—uh really just like a start and so— uh isn't—doesn't count really. Pauses and Overlaps (Cont.)
  • 16. Pauses and Overlaps (Cont.) 6- Another floor holding device is to indicate that there is a larger structure to your turn. a. There are three points I'd like to make—first ... b. There's more than one way to do this—one example would be... c. Didn't you know about Melvin?—Oh, it was last October ... d. Did you hear about Cindy's new car?—She got it in ... a/b technical information about coming structure c/d preludes to storytelling
  • 17. Speakers expect their conversational partners to indicate that they are listening. Nodding, smiling, other facial expressions, gestures, vocal indications are called backchannel signals Backchannel Caller: If you use your long distance service a lot then you'll … Mary: // uh-huh Caller: be interested in the discount I'm talking about because … Mary: // yeah Caller: it can only save you money to switch to a cheaper service Mary: // mmm
  • 18. Backchannel (Cont.) • Backchannel signals provide feedback to the speaker that the message is being received, they indicate that the listener is following and not objecting. • The absence of backchannels is interpreted as significant (in telephone conversations the speaker is prompted to ask whether the speaker is still there). • In face-to-face conversations the absence of backchannels may be interpreted as a way of withholding agreement.
  • 19. There are individual and cultural differences in conversational style/turn taking Conversation Style High Involvement Style—some individuals expect that participation in a conversation will be very active, that speaking rate will be relatively fast, with almost no pausing between turns, and with some overlap or even competition between turns. High Considerateness Style—such speakers use a slower rate, expect longer pauses between turns, do not overlap and avoid interruption or completion of the other's turn.
  • 20. Style clashes lead a conversation to be one- sided. Conversation Style (Cont.) • the faster speaker may think the slower one doesn't have much to say, is shy, perhaps boring or stupid • the slower speaker may view the faster one as noisy, pushy, domineering, selfish and tiresome features of conversational style are often interpreted as personality traits
  • 21. Adjacency Pairs Almost automatic patterns in the structure of conversation (as given below), e.g., in greetings and good-byes are called adjacency pairs. Examples: Anna: Hello! Bill: Hi! Anna: How are you? Bill: Fine. Anna: See ya! Bill: Bye!
  • 22. Adjacency Pairs (Cont.) • These automatic sequences are called adjacency pairs • They always consist of a first and second part produced by different speakers. • The utterance of the first part immediately creates an expectation of the utterance of a second part of the pair. • Failure to produce the second part will be treated as a significant and hence meaningful.
  • 23. Adjacency Pairs (Cont.) First Part Second Part A: What's up? B: Nothin' much A: How's it goin'? B: Jus' hangin' in there A: How are things? B: The usual A: How ya doin' B: Can't complain A lot of internal variation is possible: For example: opening of conversation.
  • 24. Adjacency Pairs (Cont.) First Part Second Part A: What time is it? B: About eight-thirty A: Thanks. B: You're welcome A: Could you help me with this? B: Sure Example: question - answer sequence in [1] Example: thanking - response sequence in [2] Example: request - accept sequence in [3]
  • 25. Adjacency Pairs (Cont.) Agent: Do you want the early flight? (= Q1) Client: What time does it arrive? (= Q2) Agent: Nine forty-five (= A2) Client: Yeah - that's great (= A1) Insertion sequences can intervene between adjacency pairs: Form Q1 - Q2 - A2 - A1 (one adjacency pair within another) Jean: Could you mail this letter for me? (Req. 1) Fred: Does it have a stamp on? (Q2) Jean: Yeah. (A2) Fred: Okay (Acc. 1) Mix of different sequences possible:
  • 26. Adjacency Pairs (Cont.) Opening Sections (Summons-Answer Sequences): First utterance is a summons, the second utterance an answer to the summons, establishing an open channel for talk (three part structure). Child: Mommy? (Summons) Mum: Yes, dear. (Answer) Child: Can I have chocolate? (Reason for summons) Examples:
  • 27. Adjacency Pairs (Cont.) Closing Sections:The closure of any topic after the first one makes the introduction of a closing section imminent • closings placed in such a way that no party is forced to exit while still having compelling things to say • hasty or slow terminations carry unwelcome inferences about the relationships between the speakers
  • 28. Adjacency Pairs (Cont.) B: Okay, so that would be in St. Jude’s wouldn’t it? A: Yes B: Okay so … A: One o’clock in the bar closing implicative topic (arrangement) B: Okay A: Okay? one or more pairs of passing turns with B: Okay then thanks very much indeed George – pre-closing items (okay, alright, so …) A: - Alright B: //See you there A: //See you there B: Okay A: Okay // bye terminal elements B: // bye Examples:
  • 29. • adjacency pairs represent social actions, and not all social actions are equal when they occur as second parts of some pairs, e.g., a first part request expects an acceptance. • acceptance is structurally more likely than refusal and Structural likelihood is called preference Preference Structures Preference structure divides second parts into PREFERRED and DISPREFERRED social acts
  • 30. First part Preference Structures Second part Preferred Dispreferre d Assessment Isn't that really great? agree Yes, it is disagree Invitation Why not join us tonight? accept I’d love to refuse offer Want some coffee? accept Yes, please decline proposal Maybe we could go for a walk. agree That'd be great disagree request Can you help me? accept Sure refuse
  • 31. Silence is also always a dispreferred response, often leading to a revision of the first part. (Non-response communicates that the speaker is not in a position to provide the preferred response) Preference Structure (Cont.) Sandy: But I'm sure they'll have good food there (1.6 seconds) Sandy: Hmm—I guess the food isn't great Jack: Nah—people mostly go for the music Silence is risky as it may give the impression of non-participation in the conversational Structure. Speakers often signal that they are producing the marked, dispreferred structure
  • 32. Aassessment: Preference Structure (Cont.) Cindy: So chiropodists do hands I guess Julie: Em - well - out there - they they mostly work on people's feet - initial hesitation: delay (em + pause) - preface: well - appeal to the views of others: out there - stumbling repetition: they they - relativizing statement/mitigation: mostly
  • 33. Invitation: Preference Structure (Cont.) Becky: Come over for some coffee later Wally: Oh - eh - I'd love to - but you see - I - I'm supposed to get this finished - you know - hesitation: oh - eh - preface: I'd love to (token acceptance) - stumbling repetition: I - I'm - account: I'm supposed to get this finished - invocation of understanding: but you see, you know
  • 34. How to do a dispreferred second part? Preference Structure (Cont.) delay/hesitate pause; er; em; ah preface well; oh express doubt I'm not sure; I don't know token acceptance that's great; I'd love to apology I'm sorry; what a pity mention obligation I must do X; I'm expected in Y appeal for understanding you see; you know make it non-personal everbody else; out there give an account too much work; no time left use mitigators really; mostly; sort of; kinda hedge the negative I guess not; not possible
  • 35. Preference Structure (Cont.) • dispreferreds take more time/language/effort • more language creates more distance between first and second part • preferred represents closeness and quick connection • participants try to avoid creating contexts for dispreferreds e.g., by using pre-sequences