Dr Manoj Das
Ortho Resident
Coxa Vara
 Normal neck shaft angle 120-140 deg
 Neck shaft angle of <120deg is called coxa vara
Classification
Developmental
 Isolated (may be bilateral)
 Associated with a skeletal dysplasia
o Cleidocranial dysostosis
o Metaphyseal dysostosis
o Other skeletal dysplasias
Congenital Femoral Deficiency
with Coxa Vara
Acquired
 Slipped capital femoral epiphysis
 Sequelae of avascular necrosis of the femoral
epiphysis
o Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease
o Traumatic
o Femoral neck fracture
o Traumatic hip dislocation
o Post reduction for developmental
dysplasia of the hip
o Septic necrosis
o Other causes of avascular necrosis of the
immature femoral head
 Coxa vara associated with pathologic bone
disorders
- Osteogenesis imperfecta
- Fibrous dysplasia
- Renal osteodystrophy
- Osteopetrosis
- Other bone-softening conditions affecting the
femoral neck
Congenital Coxa Vara
 Presence at birth
 extremely rare
 associated with other congenital anomalies such as
- proximal femoral focal deficiency
-fibular hemimelia
-anomalies in other part of the body such as cleidocranial
dyastosis
 The femoral deformity is present in the subtrochantric area where the
bone is bent
Congenital Coxa Vara
 cortices are thickened and may be associated with overlying skin
dimples
 External rotation of the femur with valgus deformity of knee may be
noted
 condition does not resolve and requires surgical management
Developmental Coxa Vara
Developmental abnormality characterized by primary cartilaginous
defect in the femoral neck with
- an abnormal decrease in the femoral neck–shaft angle
- shortening of the femoral neck
- relative overgrowth of the greater trochanter
- and shortening of the affected lower limb
Developmental Coxa Vara
 Incidence :
1 in 25,000 live births in the Scandinavian population
 M:F=1:1
 unilateral to bilateral cases in between 1:2and 3:1
Bilateral cases more likely to be associated with a generalized skeletal dysplasia
Pathophysiology of Developmental
Coxa Vara
 precise cause is unknown
 primary defect in enchondral ossification of the medial
part of the femoral neck
Pathophysiology of Developmental
Coxa Vara
• Early in fetal development, the proximal femoral physis extends across the upper
end of the femur as a crescentic line of cartilage columns
• differentiates into cervical epiphyseal and trochanteric apophyseal portions
• The medial cervical portion matures early, elongating the femoral neck, and the
ossification center of the capital femoral epiphysis appears within the first 3 to 6
months of postnatal life.
Pathophysiology of Developmental
Coxa Vara
• The lateral portion of the crescentic physis matures into the greater
trochanteric apophysis, and the trochanteric secondary center of
ossification begins to ossify at 4 years of age.
• The neck–shaft angle and the length of the upper end of the femur
are determined by the relative amount of growth at these two sites
Pathophysiology of Developmental
Coxa Vara
Pathophysiology of Developmental
Coxa Vara
 large amounts of fibrous tissue rather than cancellous bone found in
the medial part of the metaphysis of the femoral neck
 the mechanically weak femoral neck could be passively deformed into
a varus angulation under the stress of muscle forces and body weight
 and the capital physis could migrate inferiorly through this weakened
portion of the femoral neck
Biomechanics
 compressive force (R) perpendicular to
the center of the hip joint
 physeal cartilage and hyaline cartilage
of the acetabulum under compressive
force (D), evenly distributed
throughout
 physis is perpendicular to the resultant
compressive force R
 Stresses on the medial side of the
femoral neck are compressive (D),
whereas on the lateral side are tensile
(Z).
Biomechanics
 In coxa vara, with a progressive decrease in
the femoral neck–shaft angle the physis
changes its position from horizontal to
vertical, thereby becoming increasingly
inclined relative to force R
 shearing force (S) across the physis
gradually increases
 upper femoral epiphysis tends to tilt and
become displaced medially
 tensile stresses (Z) increase
 Growth of the femoral neck is less on the
medial side than on the lateral side.
Biomechanics
Effects of decrease neck
shaft angle
• the tip of the greater trochanter
elevated-Abductor muscle length is
shortened
• position and direction of muscular
force (M) are altered
• point of intersection (X) of
muscular force M with the line of
action of the partial body weight (K)
lowered
• resultant compressive force R
diverges more than normal in coxa
vara- Increase shearing force
Biomechanics
Effects of shortened femoral
neck
 The length of the lever arm (h) of the
muscular force (M) is diminished
 In response to efforts to preserve
equilibrium, the muscle forces and
resultant compressive forces (R)
increase
 Therefore, shortening of the femoral
neck increases bending stress
Developmental Coxa Vara
Clinical Features
-does not manifest until after birth and usually not until walking age
-painless limp
-Easy fatigability or aching pain around the gluteal muscles
- bilateral involvement: waddling gait
Developmental Coxa Vara
On Examination
-Limitation of abduction and internal rotation
-Trendelenburg test positive
-Shortening in unilateral cases ( seldom exceeds 3 cm at skeletal maturity, even in
untreated patients)
Developmental Coxa Vara
Radiographic Findings
-decreased neck–shaft angle of the affected
hip
-widened radiolucent line corresponding to
the proximal femoral physis
-relative overgrowth of the greater
trochanter
-shortening of the femoral neck
-vertical orientation of thecapital physis
- inverted “V” Sign
Developmental Coxa Vara
Quantification of Varus
deformity
1.Neck-Shaft angle
2.Head-Shaft angle
3.Helgenreiner-Epiphyseal
angle(H-E angle)
Developmental Coxa Vara
Helgenreiner-Epiphyseal
angle(H-E angle)
Normal : 0-25 degree(Avg 16
degree)
prognostic value of the H-E angle
> 60 degrees : deformity invariably progress
and merit surgical correct
<45 degrees: stable or improves
45 and 59 degrees: indeterminate
Developmental Coxa Vara
Treatment
Goals of treatment
-stimulate ossification and healing of the defective femoral neck
-restore the femoral head–shaft angle to normal
- restore normal mechanical muscle function to the hip abductors
Developmental Coxa Vara
Modality of treatment
CORRECTIVE VALGUS OSTEOTOMIES
Valgus osteotomy of the upper femur at the intertrochanteric or
subtrochanteric level is the most effective way to correct the varus
deformity,
- to rotate the proximal femoral physis from a vertical to horizontal position
(relieving shear stress on it),
- to enhance ossification of the defect
Developmental Coxa Vara
Indications of Surgery
-H-E angle of 60 degrees or greater
-Neck shaft angle less than 110 degree
-symptomatic limp
-Trendelenburg gait
-progressive deformity
Developmental Coxa Vara
Timing of Surgery
as soon as bony development is deemed adequate by the
treating surgeon to allow secure fixation of the surgeon's
preference(Usually 4-5 yrs)
Developmental Coxa Vara
Fixation options
 Steinmann pins to the proximal and distal fragments incorporated in
plaster
 transfixing crossed Steinmann pins
 external fixation with monolateral half-pin fixators
 hybrid circular external fixation with wires and half-pins
 bifid plates (as described in Muller, Allgower, and Willenegger)
 vitallium mold arthroplasty for degenerative disease
 standard blade plates
 dynamic hip compression plates
Developmental Coxa Vara
Amount of valgus correction
-plays an important role in the recurrence of deformity with growth,
which has been estimated to occur in 30% - 70% of cases
“A postoperative HE angle of 35 degrees or less and a HS angle of 130
degrees or more was correlated with consistently satisfactory results”
“if Hilgenreiner's epiphyseal angle was corrected to < 38 degrees, 95% of
children had no recurrence of varus”.
Developmental Coxa Vara
PAUWEL’S VALGUS OSTEOTOMY
-more complex osteotomy
-cuneiform Y-shaped intertrochanteric osteotomy
objective
-to place the capital femoral physis perpendicular to the resultant
compressive force and to decrease the bending stress in the femoral
neck
Developmental Coxa Vara
PAUWEL’S VALGUS OSTEOTOMY
 Preoperative planning
 horizontal line (H) 4 to 6 cm below the
lesser trochanter
 line (Ps, corresponding to the epiphyseal
line) is drawn
 From the point of intersection of the lines
H and Ps, a third line is drawn inclined
upward 16 degrees from the horizontal
 The angle formed between the third line
(inclined upward) and the line Ps is the size
of the wedge to be resected
Developmental Coxa Vara
PAUWEL’S VALGUS OSTEOTOMY
Wedge
Resected
upper line of the
intertrochanteric
osteotomy
PAUWEL’S VALGUS OSTEOTOMY
PAUWEL’S VALGUS OSTEOTOMY
Developmental Coxa Vara
BORDEN AND COLLEAGUES
 guidewire is inserted into the center of
the superior half of the femoral neck
parallel to its upper border
 the blade of a blade plate of appropriate
size with an angle of 140 degrees is
inserted into the neck parallel to the
long axis of the femoral neck.
Developmental Coxa Vara
BORDEN AND COLLEAGUES…
 An intertrochanteric transverse osteotomy
made at level o2 to 2.5 cm distal to the angle
of the blade
 head and neck of the femur are adducted by
using the blade as a lever, and the femoral
shaft is abducted.
 lateral cortex of the upper fragment is thus
approximated to the upper end of the lower
fragment.
Adducted
Abducted
Developmental Coxa Vara
WAGNER FIXATION
 performed with a bifurcated
plate driven through the
intramedullary surface of the
proximal fragment and secured
to the distal fragment with
screws
SUBTROCHANTRIC VALGUS OSTEOTOMY
 A closing wedge osteotomy just distal to the greater trochanter
 pediatric lag screw with a side plate or proximal femoral locking plate
for internal fixation
 the amount of valgus necessary to align the hip properly is determined
preoperatively by comparing radiographs with those of the
contralateral hip.
SUBTROCHANTRIC VALGUS OSTEOTOMY
 the length of the femoral head and
neck fragment does not change
 only the angles and the leg length
change
 amount of change in leg length can be
computed by determining the change
in the two angles
 change in leg length (ΔH) is equal to
the length of the point from the
middle of the osteotomy site to the
middle of the femoral head (L) times
the cosine of one angle minus the
cosine of the new angle:
H = L(cos@1 − cos@)
SUBTROCHANTRIC VALGUS OSTEOTOMY
SUBTROCHANTRIC VALGUS OSTEOTOMY
 When the angle of correction is determined, the appropriate laterally
based closing wedge osteotomy can be determined
 First determine the diameter of the bone by drilling a guide pin
transversely through the femur
 Determine the correct size of the wedge by using a template, tangent
tables (W = tangent of the angle × the diameter), or the formula W =
0.02 × diameter × angle.
 Outline the appropriate closing wedge osteotomy in the
subtrochanteric area.
SUBTROCHANTRIC VALGUS OSTEOTOMY
After Treatment:
 A spica cast can be worn until union is Complete
 Cast can be removed at 8-12 wks
Complications
1. Recurrence
 Regardless of method of osteotomy the deformity can recur
 recurrence ranges from 30- 70%.
 children should be examined periodically after surgery; until their growth is
complete
Complications
2. Development of Coxa Valga
 more frequently seen complication of the intertrochanteric osteotomy
procedure
 attributed to injury of the greater trochanteric apophysis, resulting in premature
growth arrest
 continued growth of the capital epiphysis after healing of cervical defect
without the normal restraining influence of the greater trochanteric apophysis
Complications
3. Premature epiphyseal plate closure
 It has not been documented to relate to surgical trauma, patient age or
degree of valgus osteotomy correction
 more likely it represents a possible surgically induced acceleration of
natural epiphyseal plate closure
 50% to 89% of operated hips demonstrate premature closure of the
proximal femoral epiphyseal plate
 usually occurs within 12 to 24 months of surgery
Complications
4. Avascular necrosis
• reported in osteotomies above the level of the greater trochanter
• attributed to abnormal sublaxation of the femoral head or impairment of
the vascular supply of the femoral head.
Complications
5. Degenerative changes
 degenerative changes in developmental coxa vara appear in upto 28.5 % of
the patients.
 develop late (after the age of 30-40 years) and in 15.8% of patients they are
mild, in 12.6 % of patients they reach a considerable degree.
Complications
Other complications
- LLD
- Pseudoarthrosis
- Trochantric overgrowth
Take home message
 Clinical evaluation at infancy/childhood to identify coxa vara early and
timely intervention as per degree of severity
 Non surgical interventions has got greater degree of failure and
asso.complications
 Surgery can be delayed until the child 4-5yrs old to make internal
fixation easier
Take home message
 currently, the most effective surgical treatment is a valgus producing
proximal femoral osteotomy (subtrochanteric and intertrochanteric
procedures have similar results)
 Postoperative followup is adviced in children until epiphyseal fusion is
complete till adult age group
THANK YOU

Coxa vara

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Coxa Vara  Normalneck shaft angle 120-140 deg  Neck shaft angle of <120deg is called coxa vara
  • 3.
    Classification Developmental  Isolated (maybe bilateral)  Associated with a skeletal dysplasia o Cleidocranial dysostosis o Metaphyseal dysostosis o Other skeletal dysplasias Congenital Femoral Deficiency with Coxa Vara Acquired  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis  Sequelae of avascular necrosis of the femoral epiphysis o Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease o Traumatic o Femoral neck fracture o Traumatic hip dislocation o Post reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip o Septic necrosis o Other causes of avascular necrosis of the immature femoral head  Coxa vara associated with pathologic bone disorders - Osteogenesis imperfecta - Fibrous dysplasia - Renal osteodystrophy - Osteopetrosis - Other bone-softening conditions affecting the femoral neck
  • 4.
    Congenital Coxa Vara Presence at birth  extremely rare  associated with other congenital anomalies such as - proximal femoral focal deficiency -fibular hemimelia -anomalies in other part of the body such as cleidocranial dyastosis  The femoral deformity is present in the subtrochantric area where the bone is bent
  • 5.
    Congenital Coxa Vara cortices are thickened and may be associated with overlying skin dimples  External rotation of the femur with valgus deformity of knee may be noted  condition does not resolve and requires surgical management
  • 6.
    Developmental Coxa Vara Developmentalabnormality characterized by primary cartilaginous defect in the femoral neck with - an abnormal decrease in the femoral neck–shaft angle - shortening of the femoral neck - relative overgrowth of the greater trochanter - and shortening of the affected lower limb
  • 7.
    Developmental Coxa Vara Incidence : 1 in 25,000 live births in the Scandinavian population  M:F=1:1  unilateral to bilateral cases in between 1:2and 3:1 Bilateral cases more likely to be associated with a generalized skeletal dysplasia
  • 8.
    Pathophysiology of Developmental CoxaVara  precise cause is unknown  primary defect in enchondral ossification of the medial part of the femoral neck
  • 9.
    Pathophysiology of Developmental CoxaVara • Early in fetal development, the proximal femoral physis extends across the upper end of the femur as a crescentic line of cartilage columns • differentiates into cervical epiphyseal and trochanteric apophyseal portions • The medial cervical portion matures early, elongating the femoral neck, and the ossification center of the capital femoral epiphysis appears within the first 3 to 6 months of postnatal life.
  • 10.
    Pathophysiology of Developmental CoxaVara • The lateral portion of the crescentic physis matures into the greater trochanteric apophysis, and the trochanteric secondary center of ossification begins to ossify at 4 years of age. • The neck–shaft angle and the length of the upper end of the femur are determined by the relative amount of growth at these two sites
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Pathophysiology of Developmental CoxaVara  large amounts of fibrous tissue rather than cancellous bone found in the medial part of the metaphysis of the femoral neck  the mechanically weak femoral neck could be passively deformed into a varus angulation under the stress of muscle forces and body weight  and the capital physis could migrate inferiorly through this weakened portion of the femoral neck
  • 13.
    Biomechanics  compressive force(R) perpendicular to the center of the hip joint  physeal cartilage and hyaline cartilage of the acetabulum under compressive force (D), evenly distributed throughout  physis is perpendicular to the resultant compressive force R  Stresses on the medial side of the femoral neck are compressive (D), whereas on the lateral side are tensile (Z).
  • 14.
    Biomechanics  In coxavara, with a progressive decrease in the femoral neck–shaft angle the physis changes its position from horizontal to vertical, thereby becoming increasingly inclined relative to force R  shearing force (S) across the physis gradually increases  upper femoral epiphysis tends to tilt and become displaced medially  tensile stresses (Z) increase  Growth of the femoral neck is less on the medial side than on the lateral side.
  • 15.
    Biomechanics Effects of decreaseneck shaft angle • the tip of the greater trochanter elevated-Abductor muscle length is shortened • position and direction of muscular force (M) are altered • point of intersection (X) of muscular force M with the line of action of the partial body weight (K) lowered • resultant compressive force R diverges more than normal in coxa vara- Increase shearing force
  • 16.
    Biomechanics Effects of shortenedfemoral neck  The length of the lever arm (h) of the muscular force (M) is diminished  In response to efforts to preserve equilibrium, the muscle forces and resultant compressive forces (R) increase  Therefore, shortening of the femoral neck increases bending stress
  • 17.
    Developmental Coxa Vara ClinicalFeatures -does not manifest until after birth and usually not until walking age -painless limp -Easy fatigability or aching pain around the gluteal muscles - bilateral involvement: waddling gait
  • 18.
    Developmental Coxa Vara OnExamination -Limitation of abduction and internal rotation -Trendelenburg test positive -Shortening in unilateral cases ( seldom exceeds 3 cm at skeletal maturity, even in untreated patients)
  • 19.
    Developmental Coxa Vara RadiographicFindings -decreased neck–shaft angle of the affected hip -widened radiolucent line corresponding to the proximal femoral physis -relative overgrowth of the greater trochanter -shortening of the femoral neck -vertical orientation of thecapital physis - inverted “V” Sign
  • 20.
    Developmental Coxa Vara Quantificationof Varus deformity 1.Neck-Shaft angle 2.Head-Shaft angle 3.Helgenreiner-Epiphyseal angle(H-E angle)
  • 21.
    Developmental Coxa Vara Helgenreiner-Epiphyseal angle(H-Eangle) Normal : 0-25 degree(Avg 16 degree) prognostic value of the H-E angle > 60 degrees : deformity invariably progress and merit surgical correct <45 degrees: stable or improves 45 and 59 degrees: indeterminate
  • 22.
    Developmental Coxa Vara Treatment Goalsof treatment -stimulate ossification and healing of the defective femoral neck -restore the femoral head–shaft angle to normal - restore normal mechanical muscle function to the hip abductors
  • 23.
    Developmental Coxa Vara Modalityof treatment CORRECTIVE VALGUS OSTEOTOMIES Valgus osteotomy of the upper femur at the intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric level is the most effective way to correct the varus deformity, - to rotate the proximal femoral physis from a vertical to horizontal position (relieving shear stress on it), - to enhance ossification of the defect
  • 24.
    Developmental Coxa Vara Indicationsof Surgery -H-E angle of 60 degrees or greater -Neck shaft angle less than 110 degree -symptomatic limp -Trendelenburg gait -progressive deformity
  • 25.
    Developmental Coxa Vara Timingof Surgery as soon as bony development is deemed adequate by the treating surgeon to allow secure fixation of the surgeon's preference(Usually 4-5 yrs)
  • 26.
    Developmental Coxa Vara Fixationoptions  Steinmann pins to the proximal and distal fragments incorporated in plaster  transfixing crossed Steinmann pins  external fixation with monolateral half-pin fixators  hybrid circular external fixation with wires and half-pins  bifid plates (as described in Muller, Allgower, and Willenegger)  vitallium mold arthroplasty for degenerative disease  standard blade plates  dynamic hip compression plates
  • 28.
    Developmental Coxa Vara Amountof valgus correction -plays an important role in the recurrence of deformity with growth, which has been estimated to occur in 30% - 70% of cases “A postoperative HE angle of 35 degrees or less and a HS angle of 130 degrees or more was correlated with consistently satisfactory results” “if Hilgenreiner's epiphyseal angle was corrected to < 38 degrees, 95% of children had no recurrence of varus”.
  • 29.
    Developmental Coxa Vara PAUWEL’SVALGUS OSTEOTOMY -more complex osteotomy -cuneiform Y-shaped intertrochanteric osteotomy objective -to place the capital femoral physis perpendicular to the resultant compressive force and to decrease the bending stress in the femoral neck
  • 30.
    Developmental Coxa Vara PAUWEL’SVALGUS OSTEOTOMY  Preoperative planning  horizontal line (H) 4 to 6 cm below the lesser trochanter  line (Ps, corresponding to the epiphyseal line) is drawn  From the point of intersection of the lines H and Ps, a third line is drawn inclined upward 16 degrees from the horizontal  The angle formed between the third line (inclined upward) and the line Ps is the size of the wedge to be resected
  • 31.
    Developmental Coxa Vara PAUWEL’SVALGUS OSTEOTOMY Wedge Resected upper line of the intertrochanteric osteotomy
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
    Developmental Coxa Vara BORDENAND COLLEAGUES  guidewire is inserted into the center of the superior half of the femoral neck parallel to its upper border  the blade of a blade plate of appropriate size with an angle of 140 degrees is inserted into the neck parallel to the long axis of the femoral neck.
  • 35.
    Developmental Coxa Vara BORDENAND COLLEAGUES…  An intertrochanteric transverse osteotomy made at level o2 to 2.5 cm distal to the angle of the blade  head and neck of the femur are adducted by using the blade as a lever, and the femoral shaft is abducted.  lateral cortex of the upper fragment is thus approximated to the upper end of the lower fragment. Adducted Abducted
  • 36.
    Developmental Coxa Vara WAGNERFIXATION  performed with a bifurcated plate driven through the intramedullary surface of the proximal fragment and secured to the distal fragment with screws
  • 37.
    SUBTROCHANTRIC VALGUS OSTEOTOMY A closing wedge osteotomy just distal to the greater trochanter  pediatric lag screw with a side plate or proximal femoral locking plate for internal fixation  the amount of valgus necessary to align the hip properly is determined preoperatively by comparing radiographs with those of the contralateral hip.
  • 38.
    SUBTROCHANTRIC VALGUS OSTEOTOMY the length of the femoral head and neck fragment does not change  only the angles and the leg length change  amount of change in leg length can be computed by determining the change in the two angles  change in leg length (ΔH) is equal to the length of the point from the middle of the osteotomy site to the middle of the femoral head (L) times the cosine of one angle minus the cosine of the new angle: H = L(cos@1 − cos@)
  • 39.
  • 40.
    SUBTROCHANTRIC VALGUS OSTEOTOMY When the angle of correction is determined, the appropriate laterally based closing wedge osteotomy can be determined  First determine the diameter of the bone by drilling a guide pin transversely through the femur  Determine the correct size of the wedge by using a template, tangent tables (W = tangent of the angle × the diameter), or the formula W = 0.02 × diameter × angle.  Outline the appropriate closing wedge osteotomy in the subtrochanteric area.
  • 41.
    SUBTROCHANTRIC VALGUS OSTEOTOMY AfterTreatment:  A spica cast can be worn until union is Complete  Cast can be removed at 8-12 wks
  • 42.
    Complications 1. Recurrence  Regardlessof method of osteotomy the deformity can recur  recurrence ranges from 30- 70%.  children should be examined periodically after surgery; until their growth is complete
  • 43.
    Complications 2. Development ofCoxa Valga  more frequently seen complication of the intertrochanteric osteotomy procedure  attributed to injury of the greater trochanteric apophysis, resulting in premature growth arrest  continued growth of the capital epiphysis after healing of cervical defect without the normal restraining influence of the greater trochanteric apophysis
  • 44.
    Complications 3. Premature epiphysealplate closure  It has not been documented to relate to surgical trauma, patient age or degree of valgus osteotomy correction  more likely it represents a possible surgically induced acceleration of natural epiphyseal plate closure  50% to 89% of operated hips demonstrate premature closure of the proximal femoral epiphyseal plate  usually occurs within 12 to 24 months of surgery
  • 45.
    Complications 4. Avascular necrosis •reported in osteotomies above the level of the greater trochanter • attributed to abnormal sublaxation of the femoral head or impairment of the vascular supply of the femoral head.
  • 46.
    Complications 5. Degenerative changes degenerative changes in developmental coxa vara appear in upto 28.5 % of the patients.  develop late (after the age of 30-40 years) and in 15.8% of patients they are mild, in 12.6 % of patients they reach a considerable degree.
  • 47.
    Complications Other complications - LLD -Pseudoarthrosis - Trochantric overgrowth
  • 48.
    Take home message Clinical evaluation at infancy/childhood to identify coxa vara early and timely intervention as per degree of severity  Non surgical interventions has got greater degree of failure and asso.complications  Surgery can be delayed until the child 4-5yrs old to make internal fixation easier
  • 49.
    Take home message currently, the most effective surgical treatment is a valgus producing proximal femoral osteotomy (subtrochanteric and intertrochanteric procedures have similar results)  Postoperative followup is adviced in children until epiphyseal fusion is complete till adult age group
  • 50.

Editor's Notes

  • #17 Resultant effect 1. easy fatiguabilty 2. increase joint reaction force 3. abductor insufficiency- trendelengerg gait
  • #20 a triangular piece of bone in the medial femoral neck abutting the physis and bounded by two radiolucent bands traversing the neck and forming an inverted “V”
  • #21 Normal head shaft angle is 145 degree
  • #32 the upper line of the intertrochanteric osteotomy is drawn to extend from the base of the greater trochanter medially to transect the capital physis at the zone of resorption in the femoral neckThe point X is selected so that the length of the medial portion of the upper end of the distal femoral fragment (A) equals the length of the base of the femoral neck fragment