Cunard Line Ltd. – Managing
   Integrated Marketing
      Communication




                            Cheryl (F11014)
                            Ramya (F11045)
                          Abhishek (F11061)
                             Sagar (F11100)
                        Swaruparani (F1116)
                             Varun (F11120)
Issues Faced by Cunard
• Allotting the budget for marketing
  communications and branding
• Maintaining uniformity in communications efforts
• Finding the balance between tactical and
  strategic branding
• Effect on branding strategy due to organizational
  change
• Retaining current brand image and staying ahead
  of competition
Cunard as a Luxury Brand
• Price and service diffrential between Cunard and
  its competitors – White Star Service
• Occupies ‘upper-range’ brand level
• Protected by high entry barriers, namely price
• Aesthetic service dimensions – elegance, formal
  ‘class’ system
• Known by all, consumed by few
• Brand has sustained itself after creator’s demise
• Threats?
Is Cunard A Strong Brand?
• Queen Elizabeth II as the flagship
• Providing 5 star and 4 star facilities
• Different types of ships under the Cunard
  Brand (Big Ships eg QE II, yatch)
• Effect of Cunard Brand on perceived quality
• The Cunard Brand is as strong as the Brand QE
  II.
Brand Identity - Cunard
• Inner Core - Luxury, style, service
• Outer Core:
  – Product Scope: Cruise, Travel, Entertainment
  – Personality: Luxurious, exotic, fun, adventurous
  – Slogan: “We are not the best because we’re the
    oldest, We’re the oldest because we’re the best”
  – Culture: Very British and Proper
– Image: Suave, classy, royalty, celebrity
  – Price/quality: Niche market, sophisticated, High-
    class
  – Association: Wealth, elegance, style, special-
    occasions
  – User profile: Customers in their forties &
    fifties, refined, very well-educated, rich, married


• Value Proposition: Legacy &
  tradition, distinguished service and
  sophistication
Cunard’s Ships

Unique Image and Positioning
Sailing
Ship Name            Category               Features                                          Capacity
                                                                        Locations
                                                                    New York-Europe
Queen Elisabeth II   Luxury (5-    Ultra-luxury accommodations,     (Transatlantic),         1,850
     (QE2)           star)         Exquisite service                Caribbean. One round-    passengers
                                                                    the-world trip / year.

                                                                    Caribbean, Alaska,
                                                                    South Pacific (from
                     Luxury (5-    Ultra-luxury cruise, services
    Sagafjord                                                       North America). One      550 passengers
                     star)         same as QE2
                                                                    round-the-world trip /
                                                                    year.
                                   Ultra-luxury cruise, services
                     Luxury (5-
    Vistafjord                     same as QE2                      Based in Europe          750 passengers
                     star)

                                   ‘Casual’ cruise, Destination-
                     Premium (4-                                    Well-known Caribbean
Cunard Countess                    oriented rather than on-board                             800 passengers
                     star)                                          ports
                                   services
                                   ‘Casual’ cruise, Destination-
                     Premium (4-
 Cunard Princess                   oriented rather than on-board    Europe, Mediterranean    800 passengers
                     star)
                                   services

                                   For ‘Intimate’ ultimate deluxe
                     Luxury (5-    cruising, formal ‘Wealthy’       6 months Caribbean, 6
  Sea Goddess I                                                                              Only 58 Couples
                     star)         atmosphere, little on-board      months Europe
                                   entertainment, Very Expensive

                                   For ‘Intimate’ ultimate deluxe
                                   cruising, formal ‘Wealthy’       6 months Orient and
                     Luxury (5-
 Sea Goddess II                    atmosphere, little on-board      South seas, 6 months     Only 58 Couples
                     star)
                                   entertainment, Very Expensive    Mediterranean
• Customer Profile
  - 60% United States passengers, rest from Europe and
    others parts of the world.
• Target Segments
  – Very well educated, married individuals, heavy
    magazine readers.
  – Luxury (5-star) category: People over 55 years of age,
    top 3% - 5% income.
  – Premium (4-star) category: People above 45 years of
    age, upper 20% - 25% income.
              Year 1991 data         Income
      20th percentile                $ 16,580
      Median (50th percentile)       $ 39,679
      80th percentile                $ 74,759
      95th percentile               $ 126, 969
• Market Share Expected Growth
  –    Pre-1991 average compounded growth rate 10%
  –   Overall cruise industry: 4 million boardings/year
  –   Luxury segment (8% of total): 3,20,000 boardings/year
  –   Cunard’s 50% market-share: 1,60,000 boardings/year
  –   Growth rate decline post-1991 due to Iraq war,
      capacity > demand (assumption: 8% growth rate)

                                 Cunard Luxury Segment
                Year
                               (Projected Boardings/year)
                1991                   1,60,000
                1992                   1,72,800
                1993                   1,86,624
                1994                   2,01,554
                1995                   2,17,678
Integrated marketing tools

Direct Mail : 25%


Mass media advertising (magazines & newspapers)


Brochure & Travel agent co-operative spending


Public Relations & Promotional activities
Direct Mail
Pros                         Cons
• Used primarily as the      • Unpredictable
  reservation deadlines      • Long lead times –low
  approached.                  response
• Intended to act as a
  ‘closure’
• Orientation was tactical
Advertising
Magazines
• To create ‘look, touch and feel’ of
  cruising
• A strategic activity
• Oriented to maintain & build long
  term image & identity
• Advertising appeal to emotions
  and mind

 Newspapers
• Tactical marketing
• To create immediate or near
  term inquiry and sales
Brochures and travel agent
Brochures                       Travel agent
• To educate the potential      • Understand the mindset of
  customer                         customers and suggest the
• To create desired image for      best option
  each ship                     • Can provide insight on
                                   service – safety/security.
Public relations
Pros                                 Cons
• Cost effective way to reach the    • Lack of control over media
  market
• Can use independent & objective    • Media time / space not
  people to endorse the brand          guaranteed
• Higher credibility compared to     • Difficult to integrate brand
  advertising
• Makes advertising more visible –
                                       tag lines / slogans
  cuts through media clutter         • Evaluation metrics &
• Significant word-of-mouth            procedures not
• Circumvents customer resistance      standardized
  to marketing communications
Promotional activities

• usually tactical               • Sales promotions appeal to
  actions, providing               pocket - give that extra
• customers incentives to buy      reason/value to buy
  within a particular time,
• or to buy larger than normal
  amounts,
• or to try a new category or
  brand…
Impending Organizational Alignment

Ships were to be regrouped according to type of cruise
or type of services offered:
• Elegant 5 star cruising –QE2
• Ultra Deluxe cruising 5 -star
• Less formal, somewhat less expensive cruising
   (destination oriented; 4 star) –the cunard countes: and
   the cunard princess
• Yacht-like (luxury cruising; 5-star)-Sea Godess 1 and
   Sea Godess 2
Pros

• Executive for each group for strategy and tactical
  planning
• Orientation towards target market
• Specificity of product concept and message
• Ease of understanding for travel agents
Cons

• Further Dilution of Cunard brand
• Resources use more for developing consumer
  knowledge towards individual products (groups)
• Marketing communication to become less central
• Difficult to integrate and maintain marketing
  communication for all groups and products
• Might undo efforts put in last several years in
  integrating marketing communication.
Risks for Luxury Cruise Liners
•   Fuel prices
•   Bargaining power of Travel agents.
•   Changing tastes and preferences of consumers
•   Political scenario (eg 1991 Iraq war)
•   Sea piracy
•   Accidents
Conclusion
• What are they competing against??
  – Get away to Bahamas , Caribbean ; Castles in Europe.
• Does an umbrella brand make sense??
  – Each ship has its own ads , the umbrella brand is
    orphaned due to disconnect between the various
    ships
• What is the face of Cunard Ltd?
  – The Queen Elizabeth 2 was their strongest point;
    considered the finest in the world
Way forward

• Concentrate on 5 star luxury ships like the QE2
• Be the pinnacle of luxury in sea cruises and don’t
  dilute the brand image
• If the 4 star services and small ships are making
  profits start a sub brand which has no association
  with the main brand ( Like Taj group of hotels )
• Or else get rid of the small ships and get ships
  similar to the QE2 to consolidate the position
Cunard Line Ltd : Integrated marketing communication

Cunard Line Ltd : Integrated marketing communication

  • 1.
    Cunard Line Ltd.– Managing Integrated Marketing Communication Cheryl (F11014) Ramya (F11045) Abhishek (F11061) Sagar (F11100) Swaruparani (F1116) Varun (F11120)
  • 2.
    Issues Faced byCunard • Allotting the budget for marketing communications and branding • Maintaining uniformity in communications efforts • Finding the balance between tactical and strategic branding • Effect on branding strategy due to organizational change • Retaining current brand image and staying ahead of competition
  • 3.
    Cunard as aLuxury Brand • Price and service diffrential between Cunard and its competitors – White Star Service • Occupies ‘upper-range’ brand level • Protected by high entry barriers, namely price • Aesthetic service dimensions – elegance, formal ‘class’ system • Known by all, consumed by few • Brand has sustained itself after creator’s demise • Threats?
  • 4.
    Is Cunard AStrong Brand? • Queen Elizabeth II as the flagship • Providing 5 star and 4 star facilities • Different types of ships under the Cunard Brand (Big Ships eg QE II, yatch) • Effect of Cunard Brand on perceived quality • The Cunard Brand is as strong as the Brand QE II.
  • 5.
    Brand Identity -Cunard • Inner Core - Luxury, style, service • Outer Core: – Product Scope: Cruise, Travel, Entertainment – Personality: Luxurious, exotic, fun, adventurous – Slogan: “We are not the best because we’re the oldest, We’re the oldest because we’re the best” – Culture: Very British and Proper
  • 6.
    – Image: Suave,classy, royalty, celebrity – Price/quality: Niche market, sophisticated, High- class – Association: Wealth, elegance, style, special- occasions – User profile: Customers in their forties & fifties, refined, very well-educated, rich, married • Value Proposition: Legacy & tradition, distinguished service and sophistication
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Sailing Ship Name Category Features Capacity Locations New York-Europe Queen Elisabeth II Luxury (5- Ultra-luxury accommodations, (Transatlantic), 1,850 (QE2) star) Exquisite service Caribbean. One round- passengers the-world trip / year. Caribbean, Alaska, South Pacific (from Luxury (5- Ultra-luxury cruise, services Sagafjord North America). One 550 passengers star) same as QE2 round-the-world trip / year. Ultra-luxury cruise, services Luxury (5- Vistafjord same as QE2 Based in Europe 750 passengers star) ‘Casual’ cruise, Destination- Premium (4- Well-known Caribbean Cunard Countess oriented rather than on-board 800 passengers star) ports services ‘Casual’ cruise, Destination- Premium (4- Cunard Princess oriented rather than on-board Europe, Mediterranean 800 passengers star) services For ‘Intimate’ ultimate deluxe Luxury (5- cruising, formal ‘Wealthy’ 6 months Caribbean, 6 Sea Goddess I Only 58 Couples star) atmosphere, little on-board months Europe entertainment, Very Expensive For ‘Intimate’ ultimate deluxe cruising, formal ‘Wealthy’ 6 months Orient and Luxury (5- Sea Goddess II atmosphere, little on-board South seas, 6 months Only 58 Couples star) entertainment, Very Expensive Mediterranean
  • 9.
    • Customer Profile - 60% United States passengers, rest from Europe and others parts of the world. • Target Segments – Very well educated, married individuals, heavy magazine readers. – Luxury (5-star) category: People over 55 years of age, top 3% - 5% income. – Premium (4-star) category: People above 45 years of age, upper 20% - 25% income. Year 1991 data Income 20th percentile $ 16,580 Median (50th percentile) $ 39,679 80th percentile $ 74,759 95th percentile $ 126, 969
  • 10.
    • Market ShareExpected Growth – Pre-1991 average compounded growth rate 10% – Overall cruise industry: 4 million boardings/year – Luxury segment (8% of total): 3,20,000 boardings/year – Cunard’s 50% market-share: 1,60,000 boardings/year – Growth rate decline post-1991 due to Iraq war, capacity > demand (assumption: 8% growth rate) Cunard Luxury Segment Year (Projected Boardings/year) 1991 1,60,000 1992 1,72,800 1993 1,86,624 1994 2,01,554 1995 2,17,678
  • 11.
    Integrated marketing tools DirectMail : 25% Mass media advertising (magazines & newspapers) Brochure & Travel agent co-operative spending Public Relations & Promotional activities
  • 12.
    Direct Mail Pros Cons • Used primarily as the • Unpredictable reservation deadlines • Long lead times –low approached. response • Intended to act as a ‘closure’ • Orientation was tactical
  • 13.
    Advertising Magazines • To create‘look, touch and feel’ of cruising • A strategic activity • Oriented to maintain & build long term image & identity • Advertising appeal to emotions and mind Newspapers • Tactical marketing • To create immediate or near term inquiry and sales
  • 14.
    Brochures and travelagent Brochures Travel agent • To educate the potential • Understand the mindset of customer customers and suggest the • To create desired image for best option each ship • Can provide insight on service – safety/security.
  • 15.
    Public relations Pros Cons • Cost effective way to reach the • Lack of control over media market • Can use independent & objective • Media time / space not people to endorse the brand guaranteed • Higher credibility compared to • Difficult to integrate brand advertising • Makes advertising more visible – tag lines / slogans cuts through media clutter • Evaluation metrics & • Significant word-of-mouth procedures not • Circumvents customer resistance standardized to marketing communications
  • 16.
    Promotional activities • usuallytactical • Sales promotions appeal to actions, providing pocket - give that extra • customers incentives to buy reason/value to buy within a particular time, • or to buy larger than normal amounts, • or to try a new category or brand…
  • 17.
    Impending Organizational Alignment Shipswere to be regrouped according to type of cruise or type of services offered: • Elegant 5 star cruising –QE2 • Ultra Deluxe cruising 5 -star • Less formal, somewhat less expensive cruising (destination oriented; 4 star) –the cunard countes: and the cunard princess • Yacht-like (luxury cruising; 5-star)-Sea Godess 1 and Sea Godess 2
  • 18.
    Pros • Executive foreach group for strategy and tactical planning • Orientation towards target market • Specificity of product concept and message • Ease of understanding for travel agents
  • 19.
    Cons • Further Dilutionof Cunard brand • Resources use more for developing consumer knowledge towards individual products (groups) • Marketing communication to become less central • Difficult to integrate and maintain marketing communication for all groups and products • Might undo efforts put in last several years in integrating marketing communication.
  • 20.
    Risks for LuxuryCruise Liners • Fuel prices • Bargaining power of Travel agents. • Changing tastes and preferences of consumers • Political scenario (eg 1991 Iraq war) • Sea piracy • Accidents
  • 21.
    Conclusion • What arethey competing against?? – Get away to Bahamas , Caribbean ; Castles in Europe. • Does an umbrella brand make sense?? – Each ship has its own ads , the umbrella brand is orphaned due to disconnect between the various ships • What is the face of Cunard Ltd? – The Queen Elizabeth 2 was their strongest point; considered the finest in the world
  • 22.
    Way forward • Concentrateon 5 star luxury ships like the QE2 • Be the pinnacle of luxury in sea cruises and don’t dilute the brand image • If the 4 star services and small ships are making profits start a sub brand which has no association with the main brand ( Like Taj group of hotels ) • Or else get rid of the small ships and get ships similar to the QE2 to consolidate the position

Editor's Notes

  • #4 White Star Service – Legendary, Elegant, and Memorable