CURRICULUM
DEVELOPMENT
MODELS
PREPARED BY:
DIVINE JESSICA P. CAMIRING
CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT MODELS
-Curriculum development models help designers
to systematically map out the rationale for the use of
particular teaching, learning and assessment
approaches.
-These are targeted needs and characteristics of
a particular group of learners.
Models are used to explain:
- levels of curriculum
- aspects of organization practice
- aspects of classroom instruction
- types of decision making
SYTEMATIC DESIGN
MODEL BY ROBERT
DIAMOND
Systematic Design model
was created by Robert M.
Diamond in 1989. Diamond
was a professor of
instructional design,
development, and evaluation
and of higher education at
Syracuse University in
Syracuse, New York.
PHASES OF SYSTEMATIC DESIGN MODEL
Phase I- Project Selection and Design
Phase II- Production, Implementation and Evaluation for each unit
Phase I- Project Selection and Design
Phase II- Production, Implementation and
Evaluation for each unit
5 KEY STAGES OF SYSTEMATIC/ DIAMOND
DESIGN MODEL
1) Determining the need to change;
2) Identifying goals or desirable outcomes;
3) Designing the curriculum or instruction to attain these goals
and the assessments that will provide the necessary
feedback as to the attainment of goals;
4) Implementation and assessment; and
5) Revision based on the results of the assessment.
Benefits of Systematic Design Model
1) Easy to use, sequential and cost-effective
2) Used for the design or redesign of courses, curricula,
workshops, and in every subject area
3) The programs you develop will meet accreditation agencies’
demands for clear statements of learning outcomes
4) It will ensure that all important questions are asked
Perceived Advantages and Disadvantage of Systematic
Design Model
Advantages Disadvantages
Can be utilized for course and/or curriculum
design
Very linear
Forces the developer to think “outside the box” Constraining, limits creativity
Identifies key factors that should be thought of in
sequential order.
Time-consuming to implement
Serves as a procedural (type) guide Classroom oriented
Allows you to understand you are in a process,
and for others to know their individual
Directed at total curricula in
addition to individual classes
It is data driven Requires significant input from
university personnel
MURRAY PRINT
MODEL
MURRAY PRINT MODEL
This model is published in his
book Curriculum development and
design in 1988. His model,
prescribes a sequential and logical
approach to curriculum
development to provide a useful
and easy to understand process in
developing curriculum.
PHASES OF MURRAY PRINT MODEL
STRENGTHS OF MURRAY PRINT’S MODEL
1. Sequential and logical approach to curriculum
development.
2. Recognizes the nature of involved curriculum
workers.
3. Embraces the principles of cyclical and dynamic
models.
4. Inclusion of instructional evaluation, monitoring,
and feedback system.
5. Can be used in any level of curriculum
development.
WEAKNESSES OF MURRAY PRINT’S MODEL
1. Unclear where the philosophy of the institution and
philosophy of the curriculum will come into play.
2. Weak link between curriculum presage and
situational analysis.
3. Lack of contextualization of curriculum.
4. Assumption that all teachers and developers
understand curriculum theory and elements.
5. Reflection of reality.
Cyclical Models of Curriculum
Development
1. Wheeler’s Curriculum Development
Model
2. Nicholls and Nicholls Curriculum
Development Model
3. Contextual Filters Model of Course
Planning
Wheeler’s Curriculum Development
Model
Wheeler model is a cyclic model of
curriculum developed by D. K. Wheeler in 1967.
Wheeler developed and extended the ideas
forwarded by Tyler and particularly Taba.
.
He suggested five inter-related phases in the
curriculum process which logically would
produce an effective curriculum.
Wheeler’s Curriculum Development
Model
Step 1: Selecting aims,
goals and objectives
⮚ Selection must be
relevant to the
specific content area
⮚ Tells the planner
about the direction of
educational
development.
Wheeler’s Curriculum Development
Model
Step 2: Selecting
learning experiences
⮚ Occur in the
classrooms
⮚ Concern about the
learner with their
learning environment.
⮚ Think about strategies
to deliver the aims and
objectives.
Wheeler’s Curriculum Development
Model
Step 3: Selecting content
⮚ Refer to the subject
matter of
teaching/learning
process.
⮚ Refer to several aspects
such as significance,
interest and learnability.
Wheeler’s Curriculum Development
Model
Step 4: Organizing and
integrating experiences
⮚ This step is important
as they are connected
to teaching-learning
process
⮚ Organizing learning
activities based on
pupils’ experiences.
Wheeler’s Curriculum Development
Model
Step 5: Evaluating
Evaluation of different
phases and an
examination of whether
the goals have been
attained
Nicholls and Nicholls’s Curriculum
Development Model
-This model formulated by Audrey and
Howard Nicholls shows like Tyler’s and Wheeler’s
models, that the curriculum development process
begins with the objectives.
-The main sources of the objectives should
come from the study of the local environment.
Nicholls and Nicholls’s Curriculum
Development Model
Nicholls and Nicholls’s Curriculum
Development Model
Summary:
The model is highly prescriptive and dynamic.
The inclusion of situational analysis as part of the
model is valuable principle in curriculum
development. It enables the curriculum workers to
understand better the context in which the
curriculum is developed.
Contextual Filters Model of Course
Planning
-This model was developed by Stark, Lowther,
Bentley, Ryan, Martens, Genthon, Wren and Shaw
in 1990 as part of their study conducted at the
University of Michigan National Center for
Reasearch to Improve Post Secondary Teaching
and Learning.
-This model is very teacher-centered.
Contextual Filters Model of Course Planning
Strengths of Cyclical Models
1. logical sequential structure
2. situational analysis as a starting point
3. model is flexible
4. less rigid, more relevant
1. A fundamental problem in utilizing such models is
the amount of time required to undertake an effective
situational analysis.
2. It is difficult to locate.
3. It is not different from objective model since it
adopts logical sequence.
4. It takes time to undertake an effective situational
analysis.
Weaknesses of Cyclical Models
Dynamic Models of Curriculum
Development
-Advocated by Walker (1972), Skilbeck (1976),
Stenhouse (1975)
-Curriculum is not considered as linear or
sequenced. It can start with any element and
proceed in any orders.
Dynamic Models of Curriculum
Development
The curriculum elements are seen as
flexible, interactive and modifiable in this
model. Changes can be initiated from any
point in the process.
Dynamic Models of Curriculum
Development
1. Decker Walkers Model of Curriculum
(1971)
2. Malcolm Skilbeck Model of Curriculum
Dynamic Models of Curriculum Development
1. Decker Walker’s Model of Curriculum (1971)
He argued that the objectives or rational
models of curriculum development were
neither popular nor successful. Walker
contended that curriculum developers do not
follow the prescriptive approach of the rational
sequence of curriculum elements when they
devise curriculum but proceed through three
phrases in their natural preparation of
curricula.
Stages of Walker's Model of Curriculum
Development
1.Platform Statement
2.Deliberations
3.Curriculum Design
4.Evaluation
2. Malcolm Skilbeck Model of Curriculum
-Skilbeck model locates curriculum design
and development firmly within a cultural
framework.
-It views such design as a means whereby
teachers modify and transform pupil
experience through providing insights into
cultural values, interpretative frameworks
and symbolic systems.
Dynamic Models of Curriculum Development
2. Malcolm Skilbeck Model of Curriculum
-It is a more comprehensive framework, which
can encompass either the process model or the
objective model depending on which aspects
of the curriculum are being designed. It is
flexible, adaptable and open to interpretation
in the light of changing circumstances.
Dynamic Models of Curriculum Development
Stages of Skilbeck's Model of Curriculum
Development
References:
Diamond, R. M. (1989). Designing & improving courses and curricula in higher
education: A systematic approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Branch, R. M., & Gustafson, K. L. U.S. Department of Education, Office of
Educational Research and Improvement. (1997). Survey of instructional
development models (IR-103). Syracuse, New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on
Information & Technology
https://www.academia.edu/38350559/Murray_Print_Model_for_curriculum_dev
elopment
https://www.academia.edu/34860227/Wheeler_s_Model
https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/43861/11251_2004_Ar
ticle_278770.pdf?sequence=1
Thank you for
listening!

Curriculum development Process Models.pptx

  • 1.
  • 2.
    CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT MODELS -Curriculumdevelopment models help designers to systematically map out the rationale for the use of particular teaching, learning and assessment approaches. -These are targeted needs and characteristics of a particular group of learners.
  • 3.
    Models are usedto explain: - levels of curriculum - aspects of organization practice - aspects of classroom instruction - types of decision making
  • 4.
  • 5.
    Systematic Design model wascreated by Robert M. Diamond in 1989. Diamond was a professor of instructional design, development, and evaluation and of higher education at Syracuse University in Syracuse, New York.
  • 6.
    PHASES OF SYSTEMATICDESIGN MODEL Phase I- Project Selection and Design Phase II- Production, Implementation and Evaluation for each unit
  • 7.
    Phase I- ProjectSelection and Design
  • 8.
    Phase II- Production,Implementation and Evaluation for each unit
  • 9.
    5 KEY STAGESOF SYSTEMATIC/ DIAMOND DESIGN MODEL 1) Determining the need to change; 2) Identifying goals or desirable outcomes; 3) Designing the curriculum or instruction to attain these goals and the assessments that will provide the necessary feedback as to the attainment of goals; 4) Implementation and assessment; and 5) Revision based on the results of the assessment.
  • 10.
    Benefits of SystematicDesign Model 1) Easy to use, sequential and cost-effective 2) Used for the design or redesign of courses, curricula, workshops, and in every subject area 3) The programs you develop will meet accreditation agencies’ demands for clear statements of learning outcomes 4) It will ensure that all important questions are asked
  • 11.
    Perceived Advantages andDisadvantage of Systematic Design Model Advantages Disadvantages Can be utilized for course and/or curriculum design Very linear Forces the developer to think “outside the box” Constraining, limits creativity Identifies key factors that should be thought of in sequential order. Time-consuming to implement Serves as a procedural (type) guide Classroom oriented Allows you to understand you are in a process, and for others to know their individual Directed at total curricula in addition to individual classes It is data driven Requires significant input from university personnel
  • 12.
  • 13.
    MURRAY PRINT MODEL Thismodel is published in his book Curriculum development and design in 1988. His model, prescribes a sequential and logical approach to curriculum development to provide a useful and easy to understand process in developing curriculum.
  • 14.
    PHASES OF MURRAYPRINT MODEL
  • 15.
    STRENGTHS OF MURRAYPRINT’S MODEL 1. Sequential and logical approach to curriculum development. 2. Recognizes the nature of involved curriculum workers. 3. Embraces the principles of cyclical and dynamic models. 4. Inclusion of instructional evaluation, monitoring, and feedback system. 5. Can be used in any level of curriculum development.
  • 16.
    WEAKNESSES OF MURRAYPRINT’S MODEL 1. Unclear where the philosophy of the institution and philosophy of the curriculum will come into play. 2. Weak link between curriculum presage and situational analysis. 3. Lack of contextualization of curriculum. 4. Assumption that all teachers and developers understand curriculum theory and elements. 5. Reflection of reality.
  • 17.
    Cyclical Models ofCurriculum Development 1. Wheeler’s Curriculum Development Model 2. Nicholls and Nicholls Curriculum Development Model 3. Contextual Filters Model of Course Planning
  • 18.
    Wheeler’s Curriculum Development Model Wheelermodel is a cyclic model of curriculum developed by D. K. Wheeler in 1967. Wheeler developed and extended the ideas forwarded by Tyler and particularly Taba. . He suggested five inter-related phases in the curriculum process which logically would produce an effective curriculum.
  • 19.
    Wheeler’s Curriculum Development Model Step1: Selecting aims, goals and objectives ⮚ Selection must be relevant to the specific content area ⮚ Tells the planner about the direction of educational development.
  • 20.
    Wheeler’s Curriculum Development Model Step2: Selecting learning experiences ⮚ Occur in the classrooms ⮚ Concern about the learner with their learning environment. ⮚ Think about strategies to deliver the aims and objectives.
  • 21.
    Wheeler’s Curriculum Development Model Step3: Selecting content ⮚ Refer to the subject matter of teaching/learning process. ⮚ Refer to several aspects such as significance, interest and learnability.
  • 22.
    Wheeler’s Curriculum Development Model Step4: Organizing and integrating experiences ⮚ This step is important as they are connected to teaching-learning process ⮚ Organizing learning activities based on pupils’ experiences.
  • 23.
    Wheeler’s Curriculum Development Model Step5: Evaluating Evaluation of different phases and an examination of whether the goals have been attained
  • 24.
    Nicholls and Nicholls’sCurriculum Development Model -This model formulated by Audrey and Howard Nicholls shows like Tyler’s and Wheeler’s models, that the curriculum development process begins with the objectives. -The main sources of the objectives should come from the study of the local environment.
  • 25.
    Nicholls and Nicholls’sCurriculum Development Model
  • 26.
    Nicholls and Nicholls’sCurriculum Development Model Summary: The model is highly prescriptive and dynamic. The inclusion of situational analysis as part of the model is valuable principle in curriculum development. It enables the curriculum workers to understand better the context in which the curriculum is developed.
  • 27.
    Contextual Filters Modelof Course Planning -This model was developed by Stark, Lowther, Bentley, Ryan, Martens, Genthon, Wren and Shaw in 1990 as part of their study conducted at the University of Michigan National Center for Reasearch to Improve Post Secondary Teaching and Learning. -This model is very teacher-centered.
  • 28.
    Contextual Filters Modelof Course Planning
  • 29.
    Strengths of CyclicalModels 1. logical sequential structure 2. situational analysis as a starting point 3. model is flexible 4. less rigid, more relevant
  • 30.
    1. A fundamentalproblem in utilizing such models is the amount of time required to undertake an effective situational analysis. 2. It is difficult to locate. 3. It is not different from objective model since it adopts logical sequence. 4. It takes time to undertake an effective situational analysis. Weaknesses of Cyclical Models
  • 31.
    Dynamic Models ofCurriculum Development -Advocated by Walker (1972), Skilbeck (1976), Stenhouse (1975) -Curriculum is not considered as linear or sequenced. It can start with any element and proceed in any orders.
  • 32.
    Dynamic Models ofCurriculum Development The curriculum elements are seen as flexible, interactive and modifiable in this model. Changes can be initiated from any point in the process.
  • 33.
    Dynamic Models ofCurriculum Development 1. Decker Walkers Model of Curriculum (1971) 2. Malcolm Skilbeck Model of Curriculum
  • 34.
    Dynamic Models ofCurriculum Development 1. Decker Walker’s Model of Curriculum (1971) He argued that the objectives or rational models of curriculum development were neither popular nor successful. Walker contended that curriculum developers do not follow the prescriptive approach of the rational sequence of curriculum elements when they devise curriculum but proceed through three phrases in their natural preparation of curricula.
  • 35.
    Stages of Walker'sModel of Curriculum Development 1.Platform Statement 2.Deliberations 3.Curriculum Design 4.Evaluation
  • 36.
    2. Malcolm SkilbeckModel of Curriculum -Skilbeck model locates curriculum design and development firmly within a cultural framework. -It views such design as a means whereby teachers modify and transform pupil experience through providing insights into cultural values, interpretative frameworks and symbolic systems. Dynamic Models of Curriculum Development
  • 37.
    2. Malcolm SkilbeckModel of Curriculum -It is a more comprehensive framework, which can encompass either the process model or the objective model depending on which aspects of the curriculum are being designed. It is flexible, adaptable and open to interpretation in the light of changing circumstances. Dynamic Models of Curriculum Development
  • 38.
    Stages of Skilbeck'sModel of Curriculum Development
  • 39.
    References: Diamond, R. M.(1989). Designing & improving courses and curricula in higher education: A systematic approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Branch, R. M., & Gustafson, K. L. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1997). Survey of instructional development models (IR-103). Syracuse, New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology https://www.academia.edu/38350559/Murray_Print_Model_for_curriculum_dev elopment https://www.academia.edu/34860227/Wheeler_s_Model https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/43861/11251_2004_Ar ticle_278770.pdf?sequence=1
  • 40.