04/07/25
Page 1
Deadlock Management
B. Ramamurthy
04/07/25
Page 2
Topics
• Resource
• Introduction to deadlocks
• The ostrich algorithm
• Deadlock detection and recovery
• Deadlock avoidance
– Banker’s algorithm
• Deadlock prevention
• Other issues
04/07/25
Page 3
Introduction
• Parallel operation among many devices driven by
concurrent processes contribute significantly to
high performance. But concurrency also results in
contention for resources and possibility of
deadlock among the vying processes.
• Deadlock is a situation where a group of processes
are permanently blocked waiting for the
resources held by each other in the group.
• Typical application where deadlock is a serious
problem: Operating system, data base accesses,
and distributed processing.
04/07/25
Page 4
System Model
• Resource types R1, R2, . . ., Rm
CPU cycles, memory space, I/O devices
• Each resource type Ri has Wi instances.
• Each process utilizes a resource as
follows:
– request
– use
– release
04/07/25
Page 5
Deadlock Characterization
• Mutual exclusion: only one process at a time can use
a resource.
• Hold and wait: a process holding at least one resource
is waiting to acquire additional resources held by other
processes.
• No preemption: a resource can be released only
voluntarily by the process holding it, after that process
has completed its task.
• Circular wait: there exists a set {P0, P1, …, P0} of waiting
processes such that P0 is waiting for a resource that is
held by P1, P1 is waiting for a resource that is held by
P2, …, Pn–1 is waiting for a resource that is held by
Pn, and P0 is waiting for a resource that is held by P0.
Deadlock can arise if four conditions hold simultaneously.
04/07/25
Page 6
Resource-Allocation Graph
• V is partitioned into two types:
– P = {P1, P2, …, Pn}, the set consisting of all the
processes in the system.
– R = {R1, R2, …, Rm}, the set consisting of all
resource types in the system.
• request edge – directed edge P1  Rj
• assignment edge – directed edge Rj  Pi
A set of vertices V and a set of edges E.
04/07/25
Page 7
Resource-Allocation Graph
(Cont.)
• Process
• Resource Type with 4 instances
• Pi requests instance of Rj
• Pi is holding an instance of Rj
Pi
Rj
Pi
Rj
04/07/25
Page 8
Resource Allocation Graph with
a Deadlock
04/07/25
Page 9
Resource Allocation Graph with a cycle
but No Deadlock
04/07/25
Page 10 How deadlock occurs
A B C
Deadlock Modeling
04/07/25
Page 11
Methods for Handling
Deadlocks
• Ensure that the system will never enter a
deadlock state. (pessimistic)
• Allow the system to enter a deadlock state
and then recover. Database systems;
• Ignore the problem and pretend that
deadlocks never occur in the system; Older
operating systems; (ostrich algorithm:
optimistic)
04/07/25
Page 12
Dealing with Deadlock
Strategies for dealing with Deadlocks
1. just ignore the problem altogether
2. detection and recovery
3. dynamic avoidance
• careful resource allocation
4. prevention
• negating one of the four necessary
conditions
04/07/25
Page 13
The Ostrich Algorithm
• Pretend there is no problem
• Reasonable if
– deadlocks occur very rarely
– cost of prevention is high
• UNIX and Windows takes this approach
• It is a trade off between
– convenience
– correctness
04/07/25
Page 14
Detection with One Resource of Each
Type (1)
• Note the resource ownership and requests
• A cycle can be found within the graph, denoting
deadlock
04/07/25
Page 15
Recovery from Deadlock (1)
• Recovery through preemption
– take a resource from some other process
– depends on nature of the resource
• Recovery through rollback
– checkpoint a process periodically
– use this saved state
– restart the process if it is found deadlocked
04/07/25
Page 16
Recovery from Deadlock (2)
• Recovery through killing processes
– crudest but simplest way to break a
deadlock
– kill one of the processes in the deadlock
cycle
– the other processes get its resources
– choose process that can be rerun from the
beginning
04/07/25
Page 17
Deadlock Avoidance
• Simplest and most useful model requires that
each process declare the maximum number of
resources of each type that it may need.
• The deadlock-avoidance algorithm dynamically
examines the resource-allocation state to ensure
that there can never be a circular-wait condition.
• Resource-allocation state is defined by the
number of available and allocated resources, and
the maximum demands of the processes.
Requires that the system has some additional a priori information
available.
04/07/25
Page 18
Safe State
• When a process requests an available resource, system must
decide if immediate allocation leaves the system in a safe state.
• System is in safe state if there exists a safe sequence of all
processes.
• Sequence <P1, P2, …, Pn> is safe if for each Pi, the resources that
Pi can still request can be satisfied by currently available
resources + resources held by all the Pj, with j<I.
– If Pi resource needs are not immediately available, then Pi
can wait until all Pj have finished.
– When Pj is finished, Pi can obtain needed resources, execute,
return allocated resources, and terminate.
– When Pi terminates, Pi+1 can obtain its needed resources, and
so on.
04/07/25
Page 19
Safe, Unsafe , Deadlock
State
04/07/25
Page 20
Resource-Allocation Graph
Algorithm
• Claim edge Pi  Rj indicated that process Pj may
request resource Rj; represented by a dashed line.
• Claim edge converts to request edge when a
process requests a resource.
• When a resource is released by a process,
assignment edge reconverts to a claim edge.
• Resources must be claimed a priori in the system.
04/07/25
Page 21
Banker’s Algorithm
• Multiple instances.
• Each process must a priori claim maximum
use.
• When a process requests a resource it may
have to wait.
• When a process gets all its resources it must
return them in a finite amount of time.
04/07/25
Page 22
Data Structures for the Banker’s
Algorithm
• Available: Vector of length m. If available [j] = k, there
are k instances of resource type Rj available.
• Max: n x m matrix. If Max [i,j] = k, then process Pi may
request at most k instances of resource type Rj.
• Allocation: n x m matrix. If Allocation[i,j] = k then Pi is
currently allocated k instances of Rj.
• Need: n x m matrix. If Need[i,j] = k, then Pi may need k
more instances of Rj to complete its task.
Need [i,j] = Max[i,j] – Allocation [i,j].
Let n = number of processes, and m = number of resources types.
04/07/25
Page 23
Safety Algorithm
1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n,
respectively. Initialize:
Work = Available
Finish [i] = false for i - 1,3, …, n.
2. Find and i such that both:
(a) Finish [i] = false
(b) Needi  Work
If no such i exists, go to step 4.
3. Work = Work + Allocationi
Finish[i] = true
go to step 2.
4. If Finish [i] == true for all i, then the system is in a safe
state.
04/07/25
Page 24
Resource-Request Algorithm for
Process Pi
Request = request vector for process Pi. If Requesti [j] = k then
process Pi wants k instances of resource type Rj.
1. If Requesti  Needi go to step 2. Otherwise, raise error
condition, since process has exceeded its maximum claim.
2. If Requesti  Available, go to step 3. Otherwise Pi must wait,
since resources are not available.
3. Pretend to allocate requested resources to Pi by modifying the
state as follows:
Available = Available = Requesti;
Allocationi = Allocationi + Requesti;
Needi = Needi – Requesti;;
• If safe  the resources are allocated to Pi.
• If unsafe  Pi must wait, and the old resource-allocation state is
restored
04/07/25
Page 25
Example of Banker’s
Algorithm
• 5 processes P0 through P4; 3 resource types A
(10 instances),
B (5instances, and C (7 instances).
• Snapshot at time T0:
AllocationMaxAvailable
A B C A B C A B C
P0 0 1 07 5 3 3 3 2
P1 2 0 0 3 2 2
P2 3 0 2 9 0 2
P3 2 1 1 2 2 2
P4 0 0 24 3 3
04/07/25
Page 26
Example (Cont.)
• The content of the matrix. Need is defined to be Max –
Allocation.
Need
A B C
P0 7 4 3
P1 1 2 2
P2 6 0 0
P3 0 1 1
P4 4 3 1
• The system is in a safe state since the sequence < P1, P3,
P4, P2, P0> satisfies safety criteria.
04/07/25
Page 27
Example P1 Request (1,0,2) (Cont.)
• Check that Request  Available (that is, (1,0,2)  (3,3,2)  true.
Allocation NeedAvailable
A B C A B CA B C
P0 0 1 0 7 4 3 2 3 0
P1 3 0 20 2 0
P2 3 0 1 6 0 0
P3 2 1 1 0 1 1
P4 0 0 2 4 3 1
• Executing safety algorithm shows that sequence <P1, P3, P4, P0,
P2> satisfies safety requirement.
• Can request for (3,3,0) by P4 be granted?
• Can request for (0,2,0) by P0 be granted?
04/07/25
Page 28
Deadlock Prevention
• Mutual Exclusion – not required for sharable
resources; must hold for nonsharable resources.
• Hold and Wait – must guarantee that whenever
a process requests a resource, it does not hold
any other resources.
– Require process to request and be allocated
all its resources before it begins execution, or
allow process to request resources only when
the process has none.
– Low resource utilization; starvation possible.
Restrain the ways request can be made.
04/07/25
Page 29
Deadlock Prevention (Cont.)
• No Preemption –
– If a process that is holding some resources requests
another resource that cannot be immediately allocated
to it, then all resources currently being held are
released.
– Preempted resources are added to the list of resources
for which the process is waiting.
– Process will be restarted only when it can regain its old
resources, as well as the new ones that it is requesting.
• Circular Wait – impose a total ordering of all resource
types, and require that each process requests resources in
an increasing order of enumeration.
04/07/25
Page 30
Deadlock Prevention
Attacking the Mutual Exclusion Condition
• Some devices (such as printer) can be
spooled
– only the printer daemon uses printer resource
– thus deadlock for printer eliminated
• Not all devices can be spooled
• Principle:
– avoid assigning resource when not absolutely
necessary
– as few processes as possible actually claim the
resource
04/07/25
Page 31
Attacking the Hold and Wait
Condition
• Require processes to request resources before starting
– a process never has to wait for what it needs
• Problems
– may not know required resources at start of run
– also ties up resources other processes could be using
• Variation:
– process must give up all resources
– then request all immediately needed
04/07/25
Page 32
Attacking the No Preemption Condition
• This is not a viable option
• Consider a process given the printer
– halfway through its job
– now forcibly take away printer
– !!??
04/07/25
Page 33
Attacking the Circular Wait Condition (1)
• Normally ordered resources
• A resource graph
(a) (b)
04/07/25
Page 34
Attacking the Circular Wait Condition (1)
Summary of approaches to deadlock prevention
04/07/25
Page 35
Other Issues
Two-Phase Locking
• Phase One
– process tries to lock all records it needs, one at
a time
– if needed record found locked, start over
– (no real work done in phase one)
• If phase one succeeds, it starts second phase,
– performing updates
– releasing locks
• Note similarity to requesting all resources at once
• Algorithm works where programmer can arrange
– program can be stopped, restarted
04/07/25
Page 36
Nonresource Deadlocks
• Possible for two processes to deadlock
– each is waiting for the other to do some
task
• Can happen with semaphores
– each process required to do a down() on
two semaphores (mutex and another)
– if done in wrong order, deadlock results
04/07/25
Page 37
Starvation
• Algorithm to allocate a resource
– may be to give to shortest job first
• Works great for multiple short jobs in a
system
• May cause long job to be postponed
indefinitely
– even though not blocked
• Solution:
– First-come, first-serve policy

More Related Content

PPT
DeadlockMar21.ppt.....................................
PPT
DeadlockMar21.ppt
PPT
Deadlock principles in operating systems
PPTX
OSLec14&15(Deadlocksinopratingsystem).pptx
PPTX
Methods for handling deadlock
PPT
Principles of Operating system and types
PPT
deadlock part5 unit 2.ppt
PDF
Ch7 deadlocks
DeadlockMar21.ppt.....................................
DeadlockMar21.ppt
Deadlock principles in operating systems
OSLec14&15(Deadlocksinopratingsystem).pptx
Methods for handling deadlock
Principles of Operating system and types
deadlock part5 unit 2.ppt
Ch7 deadlocks

Similar to Deadlock in software engineering for beginners.ppt (20)

PDF
CH07.pdf
PDF
Chapter 5(five).pdf
PPT
Lecture 8 - Memory Management. It deals with memory management
PPT
Operating System
PPTX
Chapter 6 - Operating System Deadlock.pptx
PPT
Deadlock
PPT
14th November - Deadlock Prevention, Avoidance.ppt
PDF
deadlocks for Engenerring for he purpose
PPTX
deadlocks.pptx
PPT
Mch7 deadlock
PPTX
Module 3 Deadlocks.pptx
PPT
Chapter 7 - Deadlocks
PPT
6. Deadlock.ppt
PDF
Deadlock Avoidance - OS
PPTX
Gp1242 007 oer ppt
PPT
Deadlock
PPTX
Deadlock
PPT
PPT
deadlock avoidance
PDF
deadlock.pdfdkfglknalkdnglqgjlejgooooo;o
CH07.pdf
Chapter 5(five).pdf
Lecture 8 - Memory Management. It deals with memory management
Operating System
Chapter 6 - Operating System Deadlock.pptx
Deadlock
14th November - Deadlock Prevention, Avoidance.ppt
deadlocks for Engenerring for he purpose
deadlocks.pptx
Mch7 deadlock
Module 3 Deadlocks.pptx
Chapter 7 - Deadlocks
6. Deadlock.ppt
Deadlock Avoidance - OS
Gp1242 007 oer ppt
Deadlock
Deadlock
deadlock avoidance
deadlock.pdfdkfglknalkdnglqgjlejgooooo;o
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Introduction to MCP and A2A Protocols: Enabling Agent Communication
PDF
Co-training pseudo-labeling for text classification with support vector machi...
PDF
Early detection and classification of bone marrow changes in lumbar vertebrae...
PDF
Ensemble model-based arrhythmia classification with local interpretable model...
PDF
EIS-Webinar-Regulated-Industries-2025-08.pdf
PDF
CXOs-Are-you-still-doing-manual-DevOps-in-the-age-of-AI.pdf
PDF
Transform-Quality-Engineering-with-AI-A-60-Day-Blueprint-for-Digital-Success.pdf
PDF
5-Ways-AI-is-Revolutionizing-Telecom-Quality-Engineering.pdf
PDF
SaaS reusability assessment using machine learning techniques
PDF
CEH Module 2 Footprinting CEH V13, concepts
PDF
Advancing precision in air quality forecasting through machine learning integ...
PDF
Transform-Your-Factory-with-AI-Driven-Quality-Engineering.pdf
PPTX
Presentation - Principles of Instructional Design.pptx
PDF
ment.tech-Siri Delay Opens AI Startup Opportunity in 2025.pdf
PDF
A hybrid framework for wild animal classification using fine-tuned DenseNet12...
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles – August ’25 Week IV
PPTX
SGT Report The Beast Plan and Cyberphysical Systems of Control
PDF
The-2025-Engineering-Revolution-AI-Quality-and-DevOps-Convergence.pdf
PDF
4 layer Arch & Reference Arch of IoT.pdf
PDF
zbrain.ai-Scope Key Metrics Configuration and Best Practices.pdf
Introduction to MCP and A2A Protocols: Enabling Agent Communication
Co-training pseudo-labeling for text classification with support vector machi...
Early detection and classification of bone marrow changes in lumbar vertebrae...
Ensemble model-based arrhythmia classification with local interpretable model...
EIS-Webinar-Regulated-Industries-2025-08.pdf
CXOs-Are-you-still-doing-manual-DevOps-in-the-age-of-AI.pdf
Transform-Quality-Engineering-with-AI-A-60-Day-Blueprint-for-Digital-Success.pdf
5-Ways-AI-is-Revolutionizing-Telecom-Quality-Engineering.pdf
SaaS reusability assessment using machine learning techniques
CEH Module 2 Footprinting CEH V13, concepts
Advancing precision in air quality forecasting through machine learning integ...
Transform-Your-Factory-with-AI-Driven-Quality-Engineering.pdf
Presentation - Principles of Instructional Design.pptx
ment.tech-Siri Delay Opens AI Startup Opportunity in 2025.pdf
A hybrid framework for wild animal classification using fine-tuned DenseNet12...
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles – August ’25 Week IV
SGT Report The Beast Plan and Cyberphysical Systems of Control
The-2025-Engineering-Revolution-AI-Quality-and-DevOps-Convergence.pdf
4 layer Arch & Reference Arch of IoT.pdf
zbrain.ai-Scope Key Metrics Configuration and Best Practices.pdf
Ad

Deadlock in software engineering for beginners.ppt

  • 2. 04/07/25 Page 2 Topics • Resource • Introduction to deadlocks • The ostrich algorithm • Deadlock detection and recovery • Deadlock avoidance – Banker’s algorithm • Deadlock prevention • Other issues
  • 3. 04/07/25 Page 3 Introduction • Parallel operation among many devices driven by concurrent processes contribute significantly to high performance. But concurrency also results in contention for resources and possibility of deadlock among the vying processes. • Deadlock is a situation where a group of processes are permanently blocked waiting for the resources held by each other in the group. • Typical application where deadlock is a serious problem: Operating system, data base accesses, and distributed processing.
  • 4. 04/07/25 Page 4 System Model • Resource types R1, R2, . . ., Rm CPU cycles, memory space, I/O devices • Each resource type Ri has Wi instances. • Each process utilizes a resource as follows: – request – use – release
  • 5. 04/07/25 Page 5 Deadlock Characterization • Mutual exclusion: only one process at a time can use a resource. • Hold and wait: a process holding at least one resource is waiting to acquire additional resources held by other processes. • No preemption: a resource can be released only voluntarily by the process holding it, after that process has completed its task. • Circular wait: there exists a set {P0, P1, …, P0} of waiting processes such that P0 is waiting for a resource that is held by P1, P1 is waiting for a resource that is held by P2, …, Pn–1 is waiting for a resource that is held by Pn, and P0 is waiting for a resource that is held by P0. Deadlock can arise if four conditions hold simultaneously.
  • 6. 04/07/25 Page 6 Resource-Allocation Graph • V is partitioned into two types: – P = {P1, P2, …, Pn}, the set consisting of all the processes in the system. – R = {R1, R2, …, Rm}, the set consisting of all resource types in the system. • request edge – directed edge P1  Rj • assignment edge – directed edge Rj  Pi A set of vertices V and a set of edges E.
  • 7. 04/07/25 Page 7 Resource-Allocation Graph (Cont.) • Process • Resource Type with 4 instances • Pi requests instance of Rj • Pi is holding an instance of Rj Pi Rj Pi Rj
  • 8. 04/07/25 Page 8 Resource Allocation Graph with a Deadlock
  • 9. 04/07/25 Page 9 Resource Allocation Graph with a cycle but No Deadlock
  • 10. 04/07/25 Page 10 How deadlock occurs A B C Deadlock Modeling
  • 11. 04/07/25 Page 11 Methods for Handling Deadlocks • Ensure that the system will never enter a deadlock state. (pessimistic) • Allow the system to enter a deadlock state and then recover. Database systems; • Ignore the problem and pretend that deadlocks never occur in the system; Older operating systems; (ostrich algorithm: optimistic)
  • 12. 04/07/25 Page 12 Dealing with Deadlock Strategies for dealing with Deadlocks 1. just ignore the problem altogether 2. detection and recovery 3. dynamic avoidance • careful resource allocation 4. prevention • negating one of the four necessary conditions
  • 13. 04/07/25 Page 13 The Ostrich Algorithm • Pretend there is no problem • Reasonable if – deadlocks occur very rarely – cost of prevention is high • UNIX and Windows takes this approach • It is a trade off between – convenience – correctness
  • 14. 04/07/25 Page 14 Detection with One Resource of Each Type (1) • Note the resource ownership and requests • A cycle can be found within the graph, denoting deadlock
  • 15. 04/07/25 Page 15 Recovery from Deadlock (1) • Recovery through preemption – take a resource from some other process – depends on nature of the resource • Recovery through rollback – checkpoint a process periodically – use this saved state – restart the process if it is found deadlocked
  • 16. 04/07/25 Page 16 Recovery from Deadlock (2) • Recovery through killing processes – crudest but simplest way to break a deadlock – kill one of the processes in the deadlock cycle – the other processes get its resources – choose process that can be rerun from the beginning
  • 17. 04/07/25 Page 17 Deadlock Avoidance • Simplest and most useful model requires that each process declare the maximum number of resources of each type that it may need. • The deadlock-avoidance algorithm dynamically examines the resource-allocation state to ensure that there can never be a circular-wait condition. • Resource-allocation state is defined by the number of available and allocated resources, and the maximum demands of the processes. Requires that the system has some additional a priori information available.
  • 18. 04/07/25 Page 18 Safe State • When a process requests an available resource, system must decide if immediate allocation leaves the system in a safe state. • System is in safe state if there exists a safe sequence of all processes. • Sequence <P1, P2, …, Pn> is safe if for each Pi, the resources that Pi can still request can be satisfied by currently available resources + resources held by all the Pj, with j<I. – If Pi resource needs are not immediately available, then Pi can wait until all Pj have finished. – When Pj is finished, Pi can obtain needed resources, execute, return allocated resources, and terminate. – When Pi terminates, Pi+1 can obtain its needed resources, and so on.
  • 19. 04/07/25 Page 19 Safe, Unsafe , Deadlock State
  • 20. 04/07/25 Page 20 Resource-Allocation Graph Algorithm • Claim edge Pi  Rj indicated that process Pj may request resource Rj; represented by a dashed line. • Claim edge converts to request edge when a process requests a resource. • When a resource is released by a process, assignment edge reconverts to a claim edge. • Resources must be claimed a priori in the system.
  • 21. 04/07/25 Page 21 Banker’s Algorithm • Multiple instances. • Each process must a priori claim maximum use. • When a process requests a resource it may have to wait. • When a process gets all its resources it must return them in a finite amount of time.
  • 22. 04/07/25 Page 22 Data Structures for the Banker’s Algorithm • Available: Vector of length m. If available [j] = k, there are k instances of resource type Rj available. • Max: n x m matrix. If Max [i,j] = k, then process Pi may request at most k instances of resource type Rj. • Allocation: n x m matrix. If Allocation[i,j] = k then Pi is currently allocated k instances of Rj. • Need: n x m matrix. If Need[i,j] = k, then Pi may need k more instances of Rj to complete its task. Need [i,j] = Max[i,j] – Allocation [i,j]. Let n = number of processes, and m = number of resources types.
  • 23. 04/07/25 Page 23 Safety Algorithm 1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n, respectively. Initialize: Work = Available Finish [i] = false for i - 1,3, …, n. 2. Find and i such that both: (a) Finish [i] = false (b) Needi  Work If no such i exists, go to step 4. 3. Work = Work + Allocationi Finish[i] = true go to step 2. 4. If Finish [i] == true for all i, then the system is in a safe state.
  • 24. 04/07/25 Page 24 Resource-Request Algorithm for Process Pi Request = request vector for process Pi. If Requesti [j] = k then process Pi wants k instances of resource type Rj. 1. If Requesti  Needi go to step 2. Otherwise, raise error condition, since process has exceeded its maximum claim. 2. If Requesti  Available, go to step 3. Otherwise Pi must wait, since resources are not available. 3. Pretend to allocate requested resources to Pi by modifying the state as follows: Available = Available = Requesti; Allocationi = Allocationi + Requesti; Needi = Needi – Requesti;; • If safe  the resources are allocated to Pi. • If unsafe  Pi must wait, and the old resource-allocation state is restored
  • 25. 04/07/25 Page 25 Example of Banker’s Algorithm • 5 processes P0 through P4; 3 resource types A (10 instances), B (5instances, and C (7 instances). • Snapshot at time T0: AllocationMaxAvailable A B C A B C A B C P0 0 1 07 5 3 3 3 2 P1 2 0 0 3 2 2 P2 3 0 2 9 0 2 P3 2 1 1 2 2 2 P4 0 0 24 3 3
  • 26. 04/07/25 Page 26 Example (Cont.) • The content of the matrix. Need is defined to be Max – Allocation. Need A B C P0 7 4 3 P1 1 2 2 P2 6 0 0 P3 0 1 1 P4 4 3 1 • The system is in a safe state since the sequence < P1, P3, P4, P2, P0> satisfies safety criteria.
  • 27. 04/07/25 Page 27 Example P1 Request (1,0,2) (Cont.) • Check that Request  Available (that is, (1,0,2)  (3,3,2)  true. Allocation NeedAvailable A B C A B CA B C P0 0 1 0 7 4 3 2 3 0 P1 3 0 20 2 0 P2 3 0 1 6 0 0 P3 2 1 1 0 1 1 P4 0 0 2 4 3 1 • Executing safety algorithm shows that sequence <P1, P3, P4, P0, P2> satisfies safety requirement. • Can request for (3,3,0) by P4 be granted? • Can request for (0,2,0) by P0 be granted?
  • 28. 04/07/25 Page 28 Deadlock Prevention • Mutual Exclusion – not required for sharable resources; must hold for nonsharable resources. • Hold and Wait – must guarantee that whenever a process requests a resource, it does not hold any other resources. – Require process to request and be allocated all its resources before it begins execution, or allow process to request resources only when the process has none. – Low resource utilization; starvation possible. Restrain the ways request can be made.
  • 29. 04/07/25 Page 29 Deadlock Prevention (Cont.) • No Preemption – – If a process that is holding some resources requests another resource that cannot be immediately allocated to it, then all resources currently being held are released. – Preempted resources are added to the list of resources for which the process is waiting. – Process will be restarted only when it can regain its old resources, as well as the new ones that it is requesting. • Circular Wait – impose a total ordering of all resource types, and require that each process requests resources in an increasing order of enumeration.
  • 30. 04/07/25 Page 30 Deadlock Prevention Attacking the Mutual Exclusion Condition • Some devices (such as printer) can be spooled – only the printer daemon uses printer resource – thus deadlock for printer eliminated • Not all devices can be spooled • Principle: – avoid assigning resource when not absolutely necessary – as few processes as possible actually claim the resource
  • 31. 04/07/25 Page 31 Attacking the Hold and Wait Condition • Require processes to request resources before starting – a process never has to wait for what it needs • Problems – may not know required resources at start of run – also ties up resources other processes could be using • Variation: – process must give up all resources – then request all immediately needed
  • 32. 04/07/25 Page 32 Attacking the No Preemption Condition • This is not a viable option • Consider a process given the printer – halfway through its job – now forcibly take away printer – !!??
  • 33. 04/07/25 Page 33 Attacking the Circular Wait Condition (1) • Normally ordered resources • A resource graph (a) (b)
  • 34. 04/07/25 Page 34 Attacking the Circular Wait Condition (1) Summary of approaches to deadlock prevention
  • 35. 04/07/25 Page 35 Other Issues Two-Phase Locking • Phase One – process tries to lock all records it needs, one at a time – if needed record found locked, start over – (no real work done in phase one) • If phase one succeeds, it starts second phase, – performing updates – releasing locks • Note similarity to requesting all resources at once • Algorithm works where programmer can arrange – program can be stopped, restarted
  • 36. 04/07/25 Page 36 Nonresource Deadlocks • Possible for two processes to deadlock – each is waiting for the other to do some task • Can happen with semaphores – each process required to do a down() on two semaphores (mutex and another) – if done in wrong order, deadlock results
  • 37. 04/07/25 Page 37 Starvation • Algorithm to allocate a resource – may be to give to shortest job first • Works great for multiple short jobs in a system • May cause long job to be postponed indefinitely – even though not blocked • Solution: – First-come, first-serve policy