ON SITE DETECTION OF PLANT
PATHOGENS USING ADVANCE
PORTABLE TOOLS
Presented By:
SANJAY KUMAR
Ph.D Plant Pathology
Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
Content
 Why detection ?
 Disease detection tools
 Biosensors
 Application based detection
Why detection ?..
• Overcome outbreak of disease
• To reduce yield losses
CONVENTIONAL
TECHNIQUES
•Visual observations
•Cultural
• Foldscope
VISUAL OBSERVATION : SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS
Citrus canker
Rot - Sclerotium rolfsii Late blight of potato – Phytophthora infestans
Problem with biotic and abiotic factors ???????
Cultures of Ralstonia solanacearum
Bacterial ooze
CULTURAL : LABORATORY TECHNIQUES
Alternaria culture
Fusarium culture
Fungal cultures…..
Microscopy
Fusarium wilt Fusarium oxysporum
Wheat rust Urediospore and teliospore
FOLDSCOPE
Origami based print fold paper- microscope that we can build in
20 minutes
The foldscope costs less than a doller, weights 8 gm and fits in
your pockets
Invented by Manu Prakash and Jim Cybulski
Limitations Faced due to conventional
techniques !!!!!!!
Latent infection : Potato ring rot
Misleading infection : Black lesions (Alternaria) and bacterial
blight of carrot (Xanthomonas)
Co-infection : Alteration of symptoms
Indirect techniques are non-invasive methods to identify plant
diseases, not through the direct identification of the pathogen, but by
detecting the impact of the pathogen on the physiological plant
response.
a) Thermography
b) Fluorescence Imaging
c) Hyperspectral Techniques
d) Gas Chromatography
Indirect Detection Methods
THERMOGRAPHY
Thermography allows the visualization of differences in
surface temperature by detecting emitted infrared radiation
[long-wave infrared (8–14 mm)].
Airborne sensors are suitable for the detection of field
patches that are diseased with soilborne pathogens (Hillnutter
et al 2011) or in later stages of the diseases (Mahlein et al
2012).
Oerke et al 2011
Berdugo et al 2014
Leaves inoculated with S. fuliginea had higher
MTD compared to the virus treatments and
the untreated control
FLUORESCENCE IMAGING
The chlorophyll fluorescence imaging can be an effective tool in monitoring leaf
diseases (Lenk et al 2007).
Chaerle et al (2007) used blue-green fluorescence to evaluate the effectiveness of this
technique in observing the development of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) infection in
tobacco plants.
Temporal and spatial variations of chlorophyll fluorescence were analyzed for precise
detection of leaf rust and powdery mildew infections in wheat leaves at 470 nm
Bravo et al 2004
Csefalvay et al 2009
Heterogeneous distribution of FV/FM and ΦPSII in artificially inoculated leaves was
associated with the presence of the developing mycelium 3 days before the occurrence of
visible symptoms and 5 days before the release of spores.
HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING
Hyperspectral imaging can be used to
obtain useful information about the
plant health over a wide range of
spectrum between 350 and 2500 nm.
Bravo et al (2003) investigated the
application of visible-NIR
hyperspectral imaging for the early
detection of yellow rust disease
(Puccinia striiformis) in winter wheat.
Also useful for the assessment of
mycotoxin producing pathogens in
maize (Del Fiore et al 2010).
Anne-Katrin Mahlein 2015
Trimble UX5
Key Features
 Apply imagery for crop scouting
to detect pests, weeds, mineral
deficiencies, and other potential
problems in agriculture
 Capture 180 acres (73 hectares)
of imagery at one inch (2.5 cm)
resolution in a single flight
 Operate in crosswinds up to 37
mph (60 kph)
Zhang et al 2018
Zhang et al 2018
Franceschini et al 2019
Examples of plant diseases assessed by imaging techniques
Mahlein 2016
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
Plant disease detection involves the profiling of the volatile compounds
Profiling of VOC used as a means to identify the type and nature of infection
Jansen et al 2011
Emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
from non-infected and Botrytis cinerea–infected
tomato plants.
BIOSENSORS FOR PLANT PATHOGEN
DETECTION
Pathogen biosensing strategies are based on biological recognition using different
receptors such as antibodies, DNA probe, phage,
Singh et al 2013
Antibody based biosensors
Electrochemical Immunosensors - based on label-free technologies
and enzymatic label based voltammetric approaches on mercury, gold
and carbon electrodes
1. Voltammetric detection based on the use of enzymes
2. Label-free electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)- based
detection
3. Label-free quartz crystal microbalance-based approaches
ECEIA sensor using gold nanoparticles as carriers of enzyme-labeled
antibodies for signal amplification, applied for Pantoea stewartii pv.
stewartii (PSS).
Zhao et al. (2014)
Optical Immunosensors
The principle of this test is based on antibody-antigen specific interaction.
The first LFIA for plant pathogen detection was designed to detect Tobacco mosaic
virus (Tsuda et al 1992).
Lateral flow microarrays
Feng et al (2015)
Soriano et al 2017
Fluorescent approaches
Charlermroj et al (2013)
Microsphere sandwich immunoassay technology based on fluorescence- loaded
magnetic microsphere and fluorophore-antibodies has been applied for detecting
multiple analytes such as biomarkers, food and plant pathogens
Charlermroj et al 2014
Quantum Dots
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) mechanism, which
describes energy transfer between two light-reactive molecules.
Many QD-FRET-based sensors have been developed for phytoplasma
disease detection such as the witches’ broom disease of lime caused by
Candidatus aurantifolia (Rad et al 2012).
Rhizomania, which is the most destructive disease in sugar beet, is
caused by beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) was successfully
reported to be detected by QD-FRET-based sensor (Safarpour et al
2012)
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) systems
Mendes et al 2008
Singh et al 2012
Dot Immunoblotting Assay (DIBA) OR Dot ELISA
ImmunoBlot Kit for Xanthomonas
campestris (Xc)
Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification
(LAMP)
 LAMP was reported for the
first time by Notomi et al (2000)
for the detection of the hepatitis B
virus.
The fast results and the high
specificity of the technique for
pathogen detection (Yan et al
2017).
Real Time Isothermal Amplication
60,000 photographs
Covers 30 crops in India
60 crops worldwide
200 crop diseases.
Early detection of old, new and emerging infectious plant disease plays critical
role in plant disease management.
Most of reported biosensors for plant disease detection are still for use at lab level,
it is expected that more portable devices will emerge in the future being a strong
support for an efficient diagnostic.
The spectroscopic and imaging technology could be integrated with an
autonomous agricultural vehicle for reliable and real-time plant disease detection
to achieve superior plant disease control and management
THANK YOU

Detection of plant Pathogens

  • 1.
    ON SITE DETECTIONOF PLANT PATHOGENS USING ADVANCE PORTABLE TOOLS Presented By: SANJAY KUMAR Ph.D Plant Pathology Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
  • 2.
    Content  Why detection?  Disease detection tools  Biosensors  Application based detection
  • 3.
    Why detection ?.. •Overcome outbreak of disease • To reduce yield losses
  • 4.
  • 5.
    VISUAL OBSERVATION :SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS Citrus canker Rot - Sclerotium rolfsii Late blight of potato – Phytophthora infestans
  • 6.
    Problem with bioticand abiotic factors ???????
  • 7.
    Cultures of Ralstoniasolanacearum Bacterial ooze CULTURAL : LABORATORY TECHNIQUES
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Microscopy Fusarium wilt Fusariumoxysporum Wheat rust Urediospore and teliospore
  • 10.
    FOLDSCOPE Origami based printfold paper- microscope that we can build in 20 minutes The foldscope costs less than a doller, weights 8 gm and fits in your pockets Invented by Manu Prakash and Jim Cybulski
  • 12.
    Limitations Faced dueto conventional techniques !!!!!!! Latent infection : Potato ring rot Misleading infection : Black lesions (Alternaria) and bacterial blight of carrot (Xanthomonas) Co-infection : Alteration of symptoms
  • 13.
    Indirect techniques arenon-invasive methods to identify plant diseases, not through the direct identification of the pathogen, but by detecting the impact of the pathogen on the physiological plant response. a) Thermography b) Fluorescence Imaging c) Hyperspectral Techniques d) Gas Chromatography Indirect Detection Methods
  • 14.
    THERMOGRAPHY Thermography allows thevisualization of differences in surface temperature by detecting emitted infrared radiation [long-wave infrared (8–14 mm)]. Airborne sensors are suitable for the detection of field patches that are diseased with soilborne pathogens (Hillnutter et al 2011) or in later stages of the diseases (Mahlein et al 2012).
  • 15.
  • 16.
    Berdugo et al2014 Leaves inoculated with S. fuliginea had higher MTD compared to the virus treatments and the untreated control
  • 17.
    FLUORESCENCE IMAGING The chlorophyllfluorescence imaging can be an effective tool in monitoring leaf diseases (Lenk et al 2007). Chaerle et al (2007) used blue-green fluorescence to evaluate the effectiveness of this technique in observing the development of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) infection in tobacco plants. Temporal and spatial variations of chlorophyll fluorescence were analyzed for precise detection of leaf rust and powdery mildew infections in wheat leaves at 470 nm
  • 18.
  • 19.
    Csefalvay et al2009 Heterogeneous distribution of FV/FM and ΦPSII in artificially inoculated leaves was associated with the presence of the developing mycelium 3 days before the occurrence of visible symptoms and 5 days before the release of spores.
  • 20.
    HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING Hyperspectral imagingcan be used to obtain useful information about the plant health over a wide range of spectrum between 350 and 2500 nm. Bravo et al (2003) investigated the application of visible-NIR hyperspectral imaging for the early detection of yellow rust disease (Puccinia striiformis) in winter wheat. Also useful for the assessment of mycotoxin producing pathogens in maize (Del Fiore et al 2010). Anne-Katrin Mahlein 2015
  • 21.
    Trimble UX5 Key Features Apply imagery for crop scouting to detect pests, weeds, mineral deficiencies, and other potential problems in agriculture  Capture 180 acres (73 hectares) of imagery at one inch (2.5 cm) resolution in a single flight  Operate in crosswinds up to 37 mph (60 kph)
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
    Examples of plantdiseases assessed by imaging techniques Mahlein 2016
  • 26.
    GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY Plant diseasedetection involves the profiling of the volatile compounds Profiling of VOC used as a means to identify the type and nature of infection
  • 27.
    Jansen et al2011 Emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from non-infected and Botrytis cinerea–infected tomato plants.
  • 28.
    BIOSENSORS FOR PLANTPATHOGEN DETECTION
  • 29.
    Pathogen biosensing strategiesare based on biological recognition using different receptors such as antibodies, DNA probe, phage, Singh et al 2013
  • 31.
    Antibody based biosensors ElectrochemicalImmunosensors - based on label-free technologies and enzymatic label based voltammetric approaches on mercury, gold and carbon electrodes 1. Voltammetric detection based on the use of enzymes 2. Label-free electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)- based detection 3. Label-free quartz crystal microbalance-based approaches
  • 33.
    ECEIA sensor usinggold nanoparticles as carriers of enzyme-labeled antibodies for signal amplification, applied for Pantoea stewartii pv. stewartii (PSS). Zhao et al. (2014)
  • 34.
    Optical Immunosensors The principleof this test is based on antibody-antigen specific interaction. The first LFIA for plant pathogen detection was designed to detect Tobacco mosaic virus (Tsuda et al 1992). Lateral flow microarrays
  • 36.
    Feng et al(2015)
  • 37.
  • 38.
    Fluorescent approaches Charlermroj etal (2013) Microsphere sandwich immunoassay technology based on fluorescence- loaded magnetic microsphere and fluorophore-antibodies has been applied for detecting multiple analytes such as biomarkers, food and plant pathogens
  • 39.
  • 40.
    Quantum Dots Fluorescence resonanceenergy transfer (FRET) mechanism, which describes energy transfer between two light-reactive molecules. Many QD-FRET-based sensors have been developed for phytoplasma disease detection such as the witches’ broom disease of lime caused by Candidatus aurantifolia (Rad et al 2012). Rhizomania, which is the most destructive disease in sugar beet, is caused by beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) was successfully reported to be detected by QD-FRET-based sensor (Safarpour et al 2012)
  • 41.
  • 42.
  • 43.
  • 44.
    Dot Immunoblotting Assay(DIBA) OR Dot ELISA ImmunoBlot Kit for Xanthomonas campestris (Xc)
  • 45.
    Loop Mediated IsothermalAmplification (LAMP)  LAMP was reported for the first time by Notomi et al (2000) for the detection of the hepatitis B virus. The fast results and the high specificity of the technique for pathogen detection (Yan et al 2017).
  • 47.
  • 48.
    60,000 photographs Covers 30crops in India 60 crops worldwide 200 crop diseases.
  • 51.
    Early detection ofold, new and emerging infectious plant disease plays critical role in plant disease management. Most of reported biosensors for plant disease detection are still for use at lab level, it is expected that more portable devices will emerge in the future being a strong support for an efficient diagnostic. The spectroscopic and imaging technology could be integrated with an autonomous agricultural vehicle for reliable and real-time plant disease detection to achieve superior plant disease control and management
  • 52.

Editor's Notes

  • #4 Need to detect plant diseases quickly, accurately and at the right point of time before an outbreak is crucial for farmers worldwide. Sensitive and robust technologies are required for the rapid diagnosis of pathogens in order to reduce yield losses (Yoo & Lee, 2016).
  • #11 Foldscope is the ultra-affordable, paper microscope. Designed to be extremely portable, durable, and to give optical quality similar to conventional research microscopes (magnification of 140X and 2 micron resolution), Foldscope brings hands-on microscopy to new places!
  • #42 Overview of surface plasmon resonance biosensor. The sensor chip is composed of a glass surface coated with a thin layer of gold that provide the physical conditions necessary for the SPR reaction. The surface of the chip is immobilized with one interacting molecule (ligand) while the other (analyte) is delivered to the surface through a microfluidic system. Polarized light is incident on the reverse side of this chip, propagating an electron charge density wave phenomenon that arises on the surface of the metallic film. This takes the form of an evanescent wave that extends beyond the sensor surface and detects mass changes on the surface. Binding of analyte to the immobilized ligand is followed by SPR, leading to detection of mass concentrations at the sensor surface. As molecules bind to and dissociate from the sensor chip surface, the resulting changes in the resonance signal create a sensorgram which is measured by a detection unit.
  • #44 SPR sensor response after the interaction of different concentrations of antigen over the immobilized antibody (1: 500) Observation • The responses increased in proportion to the concentration of teliosporic antigen due to the change of the refractive index near the SPR sensor chip
  • #46 LAMP is a PCR based technique that works with a Bst polymerase