Determinants of Indonesian E-Grocery Shopping Behavior After Covid-19 Pandemic Using the Technology Acceptance Model Approach

12
UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 01, 2021 | ISSN: 2582-6832
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
Determinants of Indonesian E-Grocery Shopping
Behavior After Covid-19 Pandemic Using the
Technology Acceptance Model Approach
Florentina Kurniasari1 and Winda Trisna Riyadi2
1,2
Technology Management Department, Universitas Multimedia Nusantara, Indonesia
Abstract— The increasing number of e-grocery start-ups and COVID19 pandemic have accelerated the growth of e-
grocery services in Indonesia. In fact, the e-grocery adoption is low compare with other e-commerce product categories
such as fashion and electronics. Customers are considering some factors including trust, risk, benefit (usefulness) and the
level of ease of use before make a decision to shop online grocery. The objective of this study is to determine whether all
these factors affect trust and finally the adoption in shopping for grocery products online and whether the Indonesian
consumers will return to shopping for grocery products offline after the COVID19 pandemic. This research provided a
new perspective by integrating Technology Acceptance Model Approach with trust as the intervening variable.
Quantitative research was conducted by distributing questionnaire among the 195 respondents who had used e-
grocery/shopping services. All data collection was analyzed using PLS-SEM (Partial Least Square – Structural Equation
Model). The results of this study indicate that perceived risks, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use have a
positive effect on trust. The study proven that trust had a significant effect in the adoption of e-grocery platform among
Indonesian shoppers. The e-grocery platform should offer innovative and consistent products or services to keep their
customers buy the groceries online even after the COVID-19 pandemic is over especially for the older generation who
are more enjoyed to buy at the conventional markets.
Keywords— Technology Acceptance Model, Perceived Risk, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness; Trust, E-
grocery Adoption.
I. INTRODUCTION
Indonesia enjoyed as the most growing e-commerce
country in the regional region. The gross merchandise
value (GMV) reached US$105 billion with 59% of it
coming from the e-commerce transactions and expected
to grow at 23% or reached US$ 172 billion in the year
2025 [1]. The COVID 19 pandemic has significantly
accelerated the adoption of e-grocery shopping behavior
due to massive restrictions on social movements. The
recent survey showed that 47% of the e-grocery
shoppers are new users from the younger generations
who were buying grocery products such as: groceries,
food and beverages (F&B), fast moving consumer goods
(FMCG) included personal and home care. Furthermore,
76% of the e-grocery shoppers would continue to shop
online even after COVID19 passed [1]. F&B and
groceries are the most sold types of products in e-
commerce throughout the year 2019 [2].
Because of its population, Indonesia is becoming a huge
market size with potential buyers who are willing to
shop online grocery. According to Snapcart's survey of
Online Grocery Shopping Habits in May 2020, 59% of
e-grocery shoppers in Indonesia have used e-commerce
sites to shop with minimum shopping frequency once a
week [3].
COVID-19 accelerates the adoption of e-grocery
shopping phenomenally. Online spending in Indonesia
increased by 31% during this pandemic [2]. Research
institute Redseer said more than 60% of customers
started buying groceries online when the COVID19
pandemic hit, and more than half said they would
continue shopping for groceries online after COVID19
passed. Pandemic situation leveraged the awareness of
Indonesian towards e-grocery shopping.
Figure 1 showed that despite its high growth and huge
market size, grocery is the product category with the
lowest e-commerce penetration compared with other
categories such as fashion and electronic. The
penetration of e-grocery in Indonesia as of 2019 was
only 0.3 - 0.5% and during the COVID-19, the
penetration improved at 0.8-1% [4].
(Source: www.redseer.com, 2020)
Figure 1: Penetration of each category in Indonesia e-
commerce business

13
This under-penetrated category mostly caused by the
complexity in handling and storing the products and the
delivery issues due to the high logistics costs and vast
delivery range area [5]. Febransyah & Goni research
showed that logistics costs are the most important
criteria for the supply chain competitiveness of the e-
commerce industry in Indonesia, with a degree of
importance of 33.19%; followed by infrastructure with
a degree of importance of 29.4% [6].
Even with penetration of grocery category is still very
low, there’s still a potential growth in e-grocery
businesses. There is a need to get a deep understanding
of consumer behavior in shopping e-grocery. The
research on e-grocery adoption in Indonesia is still
limited and difficult to find a comprehensive data
including the e-grocery market value in Indonesia [7].
Previous research related to the adoption of e-grocery
discusses various aspects such as economic and
situational factors that trigger the adoption of online
grocery shopping, as well as many discussions about
factors that affect customer adoption of online grocery
shopping using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
approach. Some factors that influence e-grocery
adoption include: perceived risk; perceived ease of use
and perceived usefulness. These factors were expected
to influence trust as the key variable in attracting the
customer adoption of e-groceries. The objective of the
study was to to determine whether perceived risk;
perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness will
create trust and finally affect the adoption in shopping
for grocery products online and whether the Indonesian
consumers will return to shopping for grocery products
offline after the COVID19 pandemic.
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
A. E-Grocery E-Commerce
Retail management system involves direct interface
interaction with customers and coordination of business
activities from start to finish—from the concept or
design stages of products, offerings, to customer
delivery and post-delivery services. The growing of
internet penetration across the countries had blossomed
the digital or online retail channel. The digital retail
channel brought the opportunities for the sellers to sell
their product or services into the virtual space and
allowed them to have wider spectrum of customers.
E-grocery e-commerce is a retail management which
focus on selling groceries online and offer more
convenience shopping and fast delivery [8]. E-grocery
shoppers more concerns about the quality or freshness
of the perishable products and the availability of certain
products that are needed [8]. According to [9], grocery
shopping is considered very stressful due to factors such
as over-crowded and long queues. Some shoppers prefer
to buy groceries and other daily necessities products
online due to the convenience factor, the simplicity and
speed in settling the transaction [8].
B. Technology Acceptance Model
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was used as an
approach in determining and analyzing some significant
factors that would influence shopper behavior in
adopting the new e-grocery platform. [10] explained that
TAM model was be able to measure the ability of
individual in accepting and finally adopting with the
new technology [11]. TAM theory emphasized on some
important factors such as: perceived usefulness,
perceived ease of use [10], and later on was enriched
with the perceived risks factors [12].
C. Perceived Risks
Perceived risks was defined as the risks factors that were
considered by shoppers when buying the online
groceries [13]. These risks were related with the
Perceived Performance-Risk if the online shoppers did
not receive the products as expected; Perceived Time-
Risk if online shoppers experienced delay in receiving
the products, and Perceived Privacy-Risk which refer to
the security concerns while paying the transaction bills.
D. Perceived Ease of Use
According to [13], the perception of ease of use is about
the extent to which a person believes that using a
particular system can eliminate effort in carrying out his
activities by maximizing the feature in that application.
Perceived ease of use defined as an easiness and
problem free in using the new technology platform [14].
[15] explained that ease of use had a positive effect into
individual behaviour in using the new technology
application [16; 11; 17]. Furthermore, [13] also
explained that perceived ease of use can be measured
some indicators, including: easy to use which referred to
the easiness in shopping for groceries products online
either through an application or a website; easy to
become skillful in learning how to shop groceries
products in an online application; easy to follow order
procedures using the guidelines information provided by
the platform and un-hassle online grocery shopping.
E. Perceived Usefulness
Perceived Usefulness defined as the level of benefits at
which grocery shoppers believed that using a particular
system can improve their performance in shopping in
more efficient ways [13]. [18] identified three constructs
for shopping activities that are considered as a smart
shopping: energy saving or time saving, money saving
and proper purchase. [18] classified the smart shopping

14
activities into two stages in which in the first stage, the
e-grocery shoppers were looking for information and
setting-up a shopping plan or budget. The second stage
covered the buying activities based on the shopping plan
and budget in order to save money, energy and have an
appropriate product. The e-grocery shoppers had a
tendency to minimize the monetary cost or non-
monetary cost and in the same time they were able to
maximize the benefit.
F. Trust
Trust related at the consumer’s level of confidence
toward the integrity and reliability of the e-groceries
provider platform [19], which covered following aspects
such as: confident level, trustworthy and the ability of
the platforms in keeping the promises and commitments
to their e-grocery shoppers.
G. E-Grocery Adoption
The adoption in using the e-grocery platform can be
measured by the shoppers’ behavioral intention in
accepting the new technology. The shoppers are willing
to buy grocery products if they found that the price is
competitive; free delivery services; and buying online
grocery whenever possible.
Based on the explanation of the theories above, the
following is the proposed research theoretical
framework:
Figures 2: Research Theoretical Framework
Based on the proposed framework, the study was being
able to develop some hypotheses as follows:
H1: Perceived Risks has a positive influence on creating
Trust among E-Grocery Shoppers. [20] in his research
which integrated the TAM theory, trustworthiness,
perceived risk and consumer traits found that a
perceived risk had an impact into non-adopter buyers
with high ICT experience. In the online shopping
context, [21] explained that perceived risk had influence
into trust in the online shopping industries. In the context
of online payment, [22] explored the effect of the
perceived risks into trust and stated that the higher risks
perceived by the customers would reduce their trusts in
using the digital platform. Therefore, lower risk
platform would create the customer trust easier [23].
H2: Perceived Ease of Use has a positive effect on
creating Trust among E-Grocery Shoppers. In the
integrated study of personality traits, perceived risk and
Technology Acceptance Model on the online shopping
behavior, it found that perceived ease of use had a
significant effect into trust [21]. [24] stated that the
online shoppers would trust the e-commerce platform
once they felt easy in using the new platform.
H3: Perceived Usefulness has a positive effect on
creating Trust among E-Grocery Shoppers. [25] in their
research of determining the factors which influence the
merchant’s intention in using the mobile wallet
technology found that there was a positive relationship
between the perceived usefulness into trust. Positive
relationship between perceived usefulness of online
review into trust was also found the the previous
research of online shopping in Mexico [26].
H4: Trust has a significant effect on E-Grocery
Adoption. [27] found that the aspect of trust toward web
retailer would influence customer’s intention to do
online transaction. Trust was the important aspects in
patient’s acceptance in using online health services [19].
[26] also concluded that trust had a positive influence
into customer’s intention in the developing countries to
buying products online.
III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This research was a hypotheses testing study to describe
the influence of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of
use, and perceived risks into e-grocery adoption using
trust as mediating variable [28]. This study distributed
questionnaires into 195 respondents who were ever
shopped for grocery products on online channels or e-
commerce platform. The minimum age of the
respondent is 17 years old since they already having the
national identity card as a requirement in doing the
financial transaction. As a quantitative research, the
respondents were asked to answer close-ended questions
with 1-5 Likert scale [29]. The first part of the
questionnaires consists with the demographic questions
and the second part of the questionnaires consist with

15
the research questions. This study had 21 indicators,
therefore the minimum sample requirement was number
of indicators (n) x 5 = 105 respondents [30].
[13] mentioned that perceived risks (PR) could be
measured into four indicators, namely: Delivery Risks
(PR1); Performance Risk/Product Quality Risks (PR2);
Payment Security Risks (PR3) and Information Security
Risks (PR4). Perceived ease of use (PE) was reflected
into four indicators, such as: Easy to use (PE1), Easy to
become skilfull (PE2); Easy to follow order procedure
(PE3); Un-hazzle Procedures (PE4 [13]. Meanwhile, the
Perceived of Usefulness (PU) could be measured with
five indicators such as: Getting the right products (PU1);
Save Effort (PU2); Save Time (PU3); Save money
(PU4) and Convenient (PU5) [18]. Trust would be
measured with the following indicators: Trustworthy
(TR1); Keeps promises & commitments (TR2); Keep
customer’s best interest in mind (TR3)[31]; Effective in
assisting to shop for groceries product (TR4) and
Capable & proficient (TR5)[19]. Finally, the e-grocery
adoption was measured by the three indicators, namely:
the Competitive Price (AD1), Free Delivery Services
(AD2) and use online grocery whenever possible
(AD3)[13]. All the primary data further tested
statistically using Structural Equation Model with Lisrel
8.80 software.
IV. RESULT & DISCUSSION
Demographic data explained the profile of the
respondents; 73.5% respondents were female with the
majority age being 30-40 years old (29%) followed by
respondents who are 17-21 years old (24%) and between
26-29 years old (14%). Only 9% respondents are more
than 50 years old and only 8% respondents between 22-
25 years old. 42% respondents had monthly income at
more than 7.5 and just only 29% respondents had
monthly income less than 2.5 milliion Rupiah. 48%
respondents were working as employees; 26%
respondents were college students; 11% were
entrepreneur and the rest were housewives. Majority of
the respondents (63%) bought beauty and healthcare
products more frequently and 82% of them bought the
groceries products using marketplace platform. All
indicators had strong correlation with the critical value
of t > 0.671 using Pearson correlation method.
Reliability test using Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient
showed the number of 0.918 which meant that this
research is valid [32]. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis
(CFA) was used to measure the fitness of the research
model. Analysis toward the structured model were used
to see the correlation toward the latent variable. The
table 1 showed that only AGFI indicator had value less
than < 0.90 and there were perfect theories in this
research. The table 2 showed the value of R Square and
Adjusted R Square for each variable:
Table 1. Design Summary for Goodness for Fit Testing Model
GOF Indicator EstimatedValue Testing Result Conclusion
Absolute Fit Value
GFI GFI > 0.90 0.90 Good Fit
RMSEA RMSEA < 0.08 0.048 Good Fit
Incremental Fit Value
NNFI NNFI > 0.90 0.98 Good Fit
NFI NFI > 0.90 0.97 Good Fit
AGFI AGFI > 0.90 0.89 Marginal Fit
RFI RFI > 0.90 0.96 Good Fit
IFI IFI > 0.90 0.98 Good Fit
Source: Data Analysis using LISREL 8.80
Table 2: R-Square and Adjusted R-Square
Variables R-
Square
Adjusted R-
Square
Perceived Risks 0.025 0.013
Perceived Ease of
Use
0.461 0.434
Perceived
Usefulness
Trust
0.032
0.987
0.021
0.863
Source: Data Analysis using LISREL 8.80
Meanwhile, the result of hypothesis testing using path
diagram, could be explained as follow:
Figure 3: Structural Diagram (Standardized)

16
Figure 4: Structural Diagram (t-Value)
The result of hypotheses testing could be explained in
the following table:
Table 3: Result of Hypotheses Testing
Hypotheses Variables Coefficient
Standard
t-
Value
Statistical
Conclusion
H1 PR  TR 0.569 6.890 Data
Supported
H2 PE  TR 0.612 8.920 Data
Supported
H3 PU  TR 0.601 7.963 Data
Supported
H4 TR  AD 0.786 9.863 Data
Supported
The research able to create a structural equation model
as follow:
TR = 0.569*PR + 0.612*PE+ 0.601*PU,
Errorvar. = 0.43 , R² = 0.783
(0.040) (0.050) (0.063)
6.890 8.920 7.963
AD = 0.786*TR, Errorvar. = 0.43 , R² = 0.862
(0.054)
9.863
The result of hypotheses testing could be explained
further:
H1: Perceived Risks has a positive influence on
creating Trust among E-Grocery Shoppers, with the
t-value > 2 (6.890), with the effect value of 0.569. The
finding showed that if the shoppers level of trust was
higher than the perceived risk, the shoppers would more
participate in e-grocery online transaction. On the
contrary, if shoppers felt that the perceived risk was
higher that trust, they did not want to take a risk and
would refuse to do the online transaction. The research
also showed that the shoppers trust toward e-grocery
platform was related with security issues in using the
platform. A higher safety protection level would
increase the level of the buying groceries product
through digital platform. The result supported previous
study that explained that the safety protection had
significant effect in e-commerce business [33]
especially when the shoppers had to make an online
payment for their transactions [11]. The finding also
supported the research done by [34] who explained the
secure platform would keep the secrecy of all the
shoppers. The e-grocery platform should reduce the
perceived risk by ensuring the freshness and quality of
the products that delivered on time.
H2: Perceived Ease of Use has a positive effect on
t-value of 8.920 and the effect value of 0.612. This result
of hypothesis testing showed that perceived of ease of
use had significant influence into trust. The finding
supported the previous research conducted by [20] who
mentioned that the easiness to use the technology would
increase the shoppers level of trust. The result also
supported the previous research that mentioned that
perceived ease of use had a significant effect into using
the digital platform [35]. The previous research showed
that perceived ease of use had a significant effect into
attitude [16]. The less effort in using the e-groceries
platform would encourage the shoppers to use and buy
the grocery products more frequently [17]. If users
found difficulties in accessing the digital platform, it
would also influence their reluctant behaviour in
adapting the new technology [14]. The result of this
research also aligned with the previous study of [36]
who explained that one key success factor for the digital
platform providers to attract the users was the ability to
provide the user interface (UI) and user experience
design (UX). Most shopper were willing to adopt the e-
grocery platform if they felt that the applications were
easy to use, flexible, simple and understandable.
H3: Perceived Usefulness has a positive effect on
t-value of 7.963 and the effect value of 0.601. The
findings showed that consumers perceived usefulness
was related with the greater benefit that they got when
buying online groceries compare with the offline one.
Some benefits that they were experienced were: time
saving, money saving and convenient [26]. The e-
grocery shoppers paid greater attention in order to get
the right products [25]. [37] found that perceived
usefulness had positive and significant effect into trust
into mobile payment and mobile wallet provider.
Meanwhile, [21] found that perceived usefulness had
positive effect into the online shopping intention. The
research also showed that the shopper preferred to adopt
the e-grocery platform if the platform was able to offer
better services.
H4: Trust has a significant effect on E-Grocery
Adoption, with the t-value of 9.863 and the effect value
of 0.786. The finding supported the previous study that
mentioned trust as the major factor in creating customer

17
perception [12]. The customer preferred to choose the
grocery platform that had positive credibility in public
image [34]. The findings showed that the online
shoppers considered the competencies and capabilities
of the digital platform staffs in assisting and handling
their problems. The e-grocery platform had to try hard
in keeping their promises in delivering superior
products. The finding supported the study conducted by
[20] who mentioned that shoppers at the young
generations were more adaptive in online businesses
[16]. Older generation more worry about the security
and privacy issues in doing online transactions and they
were not familiar enough with the digital platform.
V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Trust had the highest effect in influencing e-grocery
adoption. Meanwhile, all the variables such as perceived
risk, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness had
positive impact in developing the e-grocery shoppers
trust. The e-grocery application platform provider
should develop innovation that focus more on user-
friendly features and experiences using more
understandable languages and symbols. The R-square of
this research showed the value of 0.862. It meant that
even trust had a positive impact in e-grocery adoption
with 86.2% effect, there might be other variables that
could be considered in influencing trust, such as: social
influence and customer knowledge.
The willingness of the shopper to continue buy
the groceries product online even after pandemic
COVID-19 was depending on the consistency of the e-
grocery platform to provide the delivery services at
quicker and in the same time maintain the quality of the
product. Attractive promotion in social media and
flexible pricing management system would increase the
shopper’s intention to adopt the e-grocery platform. In
addition, the e-grocery platform could initiate the Cash
on Delivery Programs (COD) in response to the security
issues in settling the financial transaction when buying
the e-groceries product.
Acknowledgements. The author would like to thank to
Universitas Multimedia Nusantara has given financial
support in this research.
REFERENCES
[1] Google, & TEMASEK, “e-Conomy SEA 2020:
Southeast Asia’s internet economy hits an inflection
point,” In Google TEMASEK. blog.google.com,
2020.
[2] Central Bureau of Statistics, “Statistik E-Commerce
2019,” 2019.
https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2019/12/18/fd1e96
b05342e479a83917c6/statistik-ecommerce-2019.html
[3] Snapcart, “How big is your brand’s opportunity in
online grocery platforms?,” 2020.
https://snapcart.global/how-big-is-your-brands-
opportunity-in-online-grocery-platforms/
[4] L.E.K Consulting, “Covid-19 a catalyst for growth in
Indonesia’s e-grocery market,” 2021.
https://www.consultancy.asia/news/3941/covid-19-a-
catalyst-for-growth-in-indonesias-e-grocery-market
[5] Stern, N., “E-Commerce and Grocery: This Time It’s
Real. Forbes.Com,” 2020.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilstern/2020/04/27/e-
commerce-and-grocery-this-time-its-
real/?sh=648e14c25d65
[6] Febransyah, A., & Camelia Goni, J. I., “Measuring the
supply chain competitiveness of e-commerce industry
in Indonesia,” Competitiveness Review, 2020
[7] Marketeers, “Menanti Pertumbuhan Belanja Pangan
Online di Indonesia,” 2018.
https://marketeers.com/menanti-pertumbuhan-
belanja-pangan-online-di-indonesia/
[8] Jagani, K., Oza, F. V., & Chauhan, H., “Customer
Segmentation and Factors Affecting Willingness to
Order Private Label Brands: An E-Grocery Shopper’s
Perspective,” 2020. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-
7998-0257-0.ch011
[9] Aylott, R & Mitchell, V-W, “An exploratory study of
grocery shopping stressors”, British Food Journal,
101(9):683-700. October 1999. DOI:
10.1108/00070709910288883
[10] Venkatesh, V.; Bala, H., “Technology Acceptance
Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions, ”
Decision Sciences, Vol. 39 (2), pp. 273–315, 2009.
[11] Lee, C.-Y., Tsao, C.-H., & Chang, W.-C., “The
Relationship between Attitude toward Using and
Customer Satisfaction with Mobile Application
Services,” Journal of Enterprise Information
Management, 28(5), pp. 680-697, 2015.
[12] Egbunike, F.C., Emudainohwo, O.B., Gunardi, A.,
Kurniasari, F., Prihanto, J.J.N., “Sustainability
Accounting Practices and Disclosure by Multinational
Corporation in Nigeria,” Journal of Applied
Economic Sciences, Vol. XIII, Summer, 3(57),
pp. 751-759., 2018.
[13] Driediger, F., & Bhatiasevi, V., “Online grocery
shopping in Thailand: Consumer acceptance and
usage behavior,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer
Services, 48, 224–237, 2019.
[14] Lim, N, “Consumers’ perceived risk: sources versus
consequences,” Electronic Commerce Research and
Applications. Vol. 2(3), pp. 216-228, 2003.
[15] Mwiya, B., Chikumbi, F., Shikaputo, C., Kabala, E.,
Kaulung'ombe, B., & Siachinji, B., “Examining
Factors Influencing E-Banking Adoption: Evidence
from Bank Customers in Zambia,” American Journal
of Industrial and Business Management, 741-759,
2017.

18
[16] Liebana-Cabanillas, F., Higueras-Castillo, E.,
Molinillo, S., & Montanez, M. R., “Assesing The Role
of Risk and Trust in Customers' Adoption of Online
Payment System, ” International Journal of
Information Systems and Software Engineering for
Big Companies, 99-113, 2018.
[17] Shipps, B., & Phillips, B., “Social Networks,
Interactivity and Satisfaction: Assessing Socio-
Technical Behavioral Factors as an Extension to
Technology Acceptance, ” Journal of Theoretical and
Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 8(1), 35-52,
2013.
[18] Atkins, K. G., Kumar, A., & Kim, Y. K., “Smart
grocery shopper segment, ”Journal of International
Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 42–53, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2015.1082080.
[19] Mou, J., Shin, D. H., & Cohen, J., “ Understanding
trust and perceived usefulness in the consumer
acceptance of an e-service: a longitudinal
investigation,” Behaviour and Information
Technology, 36(2), 125–139, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1203024
[20] Ma, L., “Understanding non-adopters’ intention to use
internet pharmacy: Revisiting the roles of
trustworthiness, perceived risk and consumer traits,”
Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
- JET-M, 59, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101613
[21] Wu, W. Y., & Ke, C. C., “An online shopping behavior
model integrating personality traits, perceived risk,
and technology acceptance, ” Social Behavior and
Personality, 43(1), 85–98, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.1.85
[22] Yang, Q., Pang, C., Liu, L., Yen, D. C., & Michael
Tarn, J., “Exploring consumer perceived risk and trust
for online payments: An empirical study in China’s
younger generation,” Computers in Human Behavior,
50, 9–24., 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2015.03.058
[23] Chen, D., & Han, C., “A Comparative Study of Online
P2P Lending in the USA and China,” The Journal of
Internet Banking and Commerce. 17 (2), 12-15, 2012.
[24] Eisingerich, A.B., & Bell, S.J., “Perceived Service
Quality and Customer Trust Does Enhancing
Customers' Service Knowledge Matter?” Journal of
Service Research, 10(3), 256-368, 2008.
[25] Singh, N., & Sinha, N., “How perceived trust mediates
merchant’s intention to use a mobile wallet
technology,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer
Services, 52(June 2019), 101894, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101894
[26] Ventre, I., & Kolbe, D., “The Impact of Perceived
Usefulness of Online Reviews, Trust and Perceived
Risk on Online Purchase Intention in Emerging
Markets: A Mexican Perspective,” Journal of
International Consumer Marketing, 32(4), 287–299,
2020.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2020.1712293
[27] Pavlou, P. A., “Consumer acceptance of electronic
commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the
technology acceptance model,” International Journal
of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134, 2003.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275
[28] Cooper, D.R., & Schindler, P. S., “Business Research
Methods,” 10th ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 2014.
[29] Nunnaly, J, “Psychometric Theory,” pp. 64-65, 1978.
[30] Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt,
M.,” A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural
Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM),” (Second Edi).
SAGE Publications Ltd.
[31] Dhagarra, D., Goswami, M., & Kumar, G., “Impact of
Trust and Privacy Concerns on Technology
Acceptance in Healthcare: An Indian Perspective,”
International Journal of Medical Informatics, 141,
104164, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104164
[32] Malhotra, “Marketing Research (4th ed.),” SAGE
Publication. pp. 76-78, 2012.
[33] Meng, F., “What Determinants of Lending Decision
for Chinese Peer-to-Peer Lenders? Profile of Finance
Management,” University of Twente, Faculty of
Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, 2016.
[34] Walchek, S., “The unbundling of ﬁnance,” Tech-
Crunch. pp.3-9, 2015.
[35] Khosravi and Hussin: A Review of Customer
Knowledge Management Importance, “Journal of Soft
Computing and Decision Support Systems,” Vol.1 (1),
pp. 45-52, 2014.
[36] Chen, D., Lai, F., & Lin, Z., “A trust Model for Online
Peer-to-Peer Lending: A Lender's Perspective,”
Information Technology Management, 5(4), 239-254,
2014.
[37] Park, J., Amendah, E., Lee, Y., & Hyun, H., “M-
payment service: Interplay of perceived risk, benefit,
and trust in service adoption,” Human Factors and
Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 29(1), pp 31–43, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20750

Determinants of Indonesian E-Grocery Shopping Behavior After Covid-19 Pandemic Using the Technology Acceptance Model Approach

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to Determinants of Indonesian E-Grocery Shopping Behavior After Covid-19 Pandemic Using the Technology Acceptance Model Approach

More from United International Journal for Research & Technology

Recently uploaded

Determinants of Indonesian E-Grocery Shopping Behavior After Covid-19 Pandemic Using the Technology Acceptance Model Approach