Diagnostic value of sputum induction in respiratory disorders dr anirban dutta
Sputum induction is a non-invasive diagnostic tool that can be used to diagnose various lung diseases. It has several advantages such as being non-invasive, simple, safe, economical, and easily repeatable. Standardization of the procedure and processing of samples is important for uniform results. Sputum induction can help diagnose conditions such as asthma by identifying eosinophil levels, COPD by detecting neutrophil activation, pulmonary tuberculosis in smear-negative cases, and Pneumocystis pneumonia in HIV patients. It shows promise for use in lung cancer screening, community-acquired pneumonia in children, and cystic fibrosis. However, further standardization of protocols is still needed to maximize the diagnostic value and utilization of
Methods
Sputum inductionis done with
◦ Normal saline
◦ Hypertonic saline
◦ Uridine Triphosphate
Using a Ultrasonic Nebulizer with a output of
1ml/min.
Prerequisites
◦ Written informed consent
◦ Using baseline FEV1 or PEFR
◦ Pretreatment with 200-400gm of salbutamol
inhalation prior to induction
6.
Use ofBeta 2 agonists for sputum
induction is also documented
FEV1,PEFR fall>20% - STOP
Procedure
7.
SAMPLE PROCESSING
Processedwithin 2hrs
Can be stored at -20°C or -40°C in
dimethyl sulfoxide solution .
Fluid phase mediators can be estimated
even to <18hrs of sputum induction
Total cell count is done before
centrifugation using a hemocytometer.
Cell viability is determined
by a triptan blue exclusion method
9.
Differential countby Wright’s or Giemsa
stain for Eosinophils,
Neutrophils,macrophages, lymphocytes
and bronchial epithelial cells
Toluidine blue - mast cells and basophils.
Results have better contrast when staining
time is increased from 10 mins to 60
minutes
Immunocytochemical staining further
10.
Results differfrom Selected sputum
and Unselected Sputum
It also differs from the use of
◦ Dithiothreitol
◦ Delayed processing of the sputum
◦ Effect of temperature
◦ Dilution
◦ Filtration and centrifugation
Standardization is very important for
uniformity of results
11.
Bronchial Asthma
Discrepanciesand lack of correlation
with histological changes and various
investigations such as Bronchoscopic
findings ,FEV1/PEFR repeat Biopsies
and airways Hyperresponsiveness have
given place to SPUTUM INDUCTION to
evaluate and assess airway
inflammation.
Elevated Eosinophilic count of 3%
provides a clue for the asthma in 80% &
50% of patients with or without inhaled
corticosteriods respectively.
12.
Thus eosinophiliccount can help in
◦ evaluation of therapeutic measures i.e
persistence of eosinophils shows either non
compliance or acute exacerbation
◦ Requiring to either increase the dose of
inhalation of corticosteroids
◦ Addition of another anti inflammatory drug
Neutrophilia warrants an attack by viral
infection
In children , sputum eosinophilia also
well correlates with bronchial hyper-
Responsiveness and severity
◦ Sputum induction is safer in ChildHood
13.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary
Disease
Neutrophilic inflammation plays a major
role in inferring presence of infection in
COPD
Activation of neutrophil signifies Clinical
Improvement
Occurrence of eosinophilia in induced
sputum in patients of COPD indicates
requirement of Inhalational steroids
◦ Thus can be used as predictor of response to
steroid therapy.
14.
Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Preferredmethod over gastric lavage in
Children
Useful in dry coughers and smear negative
cases
It can be used for infants and children
from HIV prevalent areas
Smear + for AFB increases by 29% with
sputum induction and results are better
with 1st day.
It increases case detection rate of smear –
ve Pulmonary TB as well as smear +ve
pulm. TB
15.
Pneumocystis Carini
Pneumonia
Sputuminduction is
◦ sensitive
◦ Specific
◦ Low cost
◦ Well tolerated method in
immunocompromised patient to diagnose
pneumnocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP)
in HIV positive patients
16.
LUNG CANCER
Cytologicaldiagnostic yield by sputum
induction in the central growth as well
as lung in the elderly is almost 74%
The diagnostic technique utilized
include
◦ Specific oncogene activation
◦ Tumor supressor cell deletion
◦ Genomic instabilty
◦ Abnormal methylation
17.
Community Acquired
Pneumonia
Nebulizationtechnique using Hypertonic
saline is preferred in children as
recommended by PNEUMONIA
ETILOGY RESEARCH FOR CHILD
HEALTH (PERCH)in children
hospitalized with severe pneumonia
provided no C/I exists
18.
Cystic Fibrosis
Tofind infection and inflammation is more
useful in cases with less sputum
production
This procedure is more preferable over
BAL
Advantages :
◦ 2 fold increase in sputum production
◦ Escalated indices of inflammation TLC ,
absolute neutrophil count , interleukin levels &
neutrophil elastase activity
◦ A large number of non squamous cells and
higher detection rate of pathogens & colony
counts to diagnose CF as compared to
19.
Sputum Induction :
FUTUROLOGY
It should be routinely suggested for
Nonproductive cough
In sarcoidosis also it is of CHOICE –
diagnostic method of BAL with
fiberoptic bronchoscope are well
correlated with CD4: CD8 ratio and
levels of tumor necrosis factor in
induced sputum both in pre and post
treatment.
20.
Cellular characteristicsand presence
of mineralogenical particles in induced
sputum can also offer help in diagnosis
and assesment of patients with mineral
dust exposure and extrinsic alveolitis
In obtaining diagnostic yields of
◦ lipid laden macrophages in GERD
◦ Hemosiderin laden macrophages in Left
ventricular failure
Sputum induction can offer high
diagnostic yield in pleural TB when
there is no evidence of parenchymal
pulmonary disease
21.
Conclusion
Requires standardization,trained
technicians and back up support of
laboratory analysis of microbiological ,
biochemical and Histopathological
Evaluation
New window in diagnosing and assesing
various lung disaeases and disorders
Neverthless it requires a proposal for
protocol for future directions.
We also need to identify the reason for
underuse of this technique