Digipak Feedback and
Changes
By Olivia Doherty
Feedback
• I have received some feedback on my first draft
Digipak. These points are highlighted in the
following slides along with the changes I have
made and photos to demonstrate what has been
done.
• The picture of my first draft digipak was taken from
a phone of the computer screen. Because of this
the quality is low, however it is the only copy I have
of my draft and therefore I have to use it to
demonstrate the changes I have made.
One
The feedback I got was to add in
features that I had missed off, such as
my barcode, copyright paragraph and
record company on the back. This is
to make it look more professional and
realistic as this is what would be
expected of a normal digipak.
This is an image of where the
barcode e.t.c should have
been on my draft digipak
This is an image of where the
barcode e.t.c is on my
edited/final digipak
Two
I was also told the back page was too
blank and didn't fit with the rest of the
digipak therefore it didn't flow as well. I
decided to use my guitar photo on the
back page instead and put the side
profile photo covering both
inside segments of the digipak. This
resolved my problem of the white
borders around the photo when it was
only in one segment of the digipak.
These images show the back page
of my first draft compared to my
edited/final digipak.
These images show
the inside pages of my
first draft (notice the
white borders around
top and bottom of the
image) and my
edited/final digipak
Three
This also helped my spine look better
as I was told it didn't flow either. I
therefore also decided to enlarge my
guitar photo to cover the spine as well
so that it looked more professional.
All of these changes also helped my
digipak to look consistent throughout
and will make it easier to link to the
poster so more people will recognise
the artist by the artwork.
This image shows the
spine on my first draft
digipak
This image shows the
spine on my
edited/final draft
digipak
Four
I already knew I would have to add
the album title and artists name to the
digipak. I decided on putting them
both at the top and to not use the
word "acoustic" in the album title as it
didn't fit and didn't look right. By
putting the name and title at the top
it's more eye-catching and will grab
the audiences attention and draw
them in. By having the artist's name
in large font it is also conforming to
conventions of a pop genre, as many
of the artists have their names larger
to attract more attention.
This image shows
my edited/final
digipak front
cover
This image shows
my first draft
digipak front
cover
Draft Vs Final

Digipak feedback and changes

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Feedback • I havereceived some feedback on my first draft Digipak. These points are highlighted in the following slides along with the changes I have made and photos to demonstrate what has been done. • The picture of my first draft digipak was taken from a phone of the computer screen. Because of this the quality is low, however it is the only copy I have of my draft and therefore I have to use it to demonstrate the changes I have made.
  • 3.
    One The feedback Igot was to add in features that I had missed off, such as my barcode, copyright paragraph and record company on the back. This is to make it look more professional and realistic as this is what would be expected of a normal digipak. This is an image of where the barcode e.t.c should have been on my draft digipak This is an image of where the barcode e.t.c is on my edited/final digipak
  • 4.
    Two I was alsotold the back page was too blank and didn't fit with the rest of the digipak therefore it didn't flow as well. I decided to use my guitar photo on the back page instead and put the side profile photo covering both inside segments of the digipak. This resolved my problem of the white borders around the photo when it was only in one segment of the digipak. These images show the back page of my first draft compared to my edited/final digipak. These images show the inside pages of my first draft (notice the white borders around top and bottom of the image) and my edited/final digipak
  • 5.
    Three This also helpedmy spine look better as I was told it didn't flow either. I therefore also decided to enlarge my guitar photo to cover the spine as well so that it looked more professional. All of these changes also helped my digipak to look consistent throughout and will make it easier to link to the poster so more people will recognise the artist by the artwork. This image shows the spine on my first draft digipak This image shows the spine on my edited/final draft digipak
  • 6.
    Four I already knewI would have to add the album title and artists name to the digipak. I decided on putting them both at the top and to not use the word "acoustic" in the album title as it didn't fit and didn't look right. By putting the name and title at the top it's more eye-catching and will grab the audiences attention and draw them in. By having the artist's name in large font it is also conforming to conventions of a pop genre, as many of the artists have their names larger to attract more attention. This image shows my edited/final digipak front cover This image shows my first draft digipak front cover
  • 7.