Discharge and performance of contract
Performance may be
i-Actual performance-When both the
parties perform their respective promises, a
contract is said to have been actually
performed
ii-Attempted performance-offer to perform
may be called Attempted performance

Offer to perform is called ‘ Tender of
1- Tender must be unconditional
2-tender must be made at a proper time and
place
3-Tender must be made under such
circumstances that the person to whom it is
made may have a reasonable opportunity of
ascertaining that the person by whom it is
made is able and willing to fulfill the whole of
promise
4-If the offer is an offer to deliver anything to
the promisee,the promisee must have a
reasonable opportunity of seeing that the
thing offered is the thing which the promisor
is bound to deliver
5- The Tender must be whole and not only
the part
6-Tender must be made to the promisee or
his duly authorized agent
7-Tender made to one of several promises
has the same effect as a tender to all of
8-If any promisee neglects or refuses to
afford the promisor reasonable facilities for
the performance of the promisee
9-The Tender must be in proper form
10-The party making a Tender must be
ready and willing to fulfill the obligation
whenever called upon
11-A mere offer by post to pay the amount
is not a valid tender
12-A Tender may either be Tender of goods
1-Promisee-A third party can not demand
the performance
2-Legal Representative-In the case of
death of promisee , the Legal representative
can demand performance
3-Joint Promisees –When a person has
made a promise to two or more persons
4-Third Party-A third party can demand
1-By the Parties-As per section 37 of the
Act
2-Promisor-As per section 40 of the Act
3-Representatives-As per section 37
4-Agent-As per section 40
5-Third person-As per section 41
1- Where no time is specified
2-When time is specified
3-On application for performance by
promisee
1-Mutual and Dependent-Performance of
one party depends upon the prior
performance of other party
2-Mutual and Independent-each party
must perform independently
3-Mutual and Concurrent-Promise has to
be performed simultaneously.
1-Express appropriation by Debtor
2-Implied appropriation by debtor
3-Principal and Interest when both are due
4-Apporpriation by Creditor
5-Apporpriation by Law
6-The rule in re Hallett’s estate
i-If the parties to a contract agree to
substitute a new contract
ii- Promisee may dispense with or remit
wholly or part, the performance of a promise
made by him
iii-When a person at whose option a
contract is voidable rescinds it.
iv-If any promisee neglects or refuses to
afford the promisor reasonable facilities
v-When a contract becomes void because
of supervening impossibility or illegality
vi-When a person has a right to rescind a
contract
vii-When a promisor is excused by any other
law
i-Novation or Substitution-Some new
contract got substituted
ii-Alteration-Change in terms of contract
iii- Rescission-If the parties agree to
rescind it
iv-Remission--Acceptance of lesser sum
compared to the original contract
v-Waiver-To dispense with
vi-Merger-When superior right and inferior
1-Insolvency-The promisor is discharged
2-Merger-Extinguishesing the right
3-Death-The death of the promisor
discharges the contract
4-Lapse of time-The Limitation Act 1963
5-Material alteration or unauthorized
alteration-Change in one or more of the
material terms of contract
Meaning-According to Sec 56, impossibility
of performance may fall into
i-Impossibilty existing at the time of contract
known as pre-contractual or initial
impossibility
ii-Subsequent or supervening impossibility
also known as post- contractual impossibility
1-Destruction of the object necessary for the
performance of the contract
2-Change of law
3-Personal incapacity
4-Outbreak of war
1-Difficulty of performance
2-Commercial Impossibility
3-Impossibilty due to the behavior of a third
party
4-Self induced impossibility
5-Strikes, Lockouts ,and Civil disturbances
6-Partial impossibility
7-Rights and obligations under a transfer of
property under a case
8-Temporary interruptio9-Matters with the
contemplation of parties
1-Actual breach of contract-At the time
when the performance id due
2-Anticipatory Breach of contract-By
renunciation
1-If the contracted is ended at once-The
amount of damages will be measured by the
difference between the prices prevailing on
the date of breach
2-If the contract is kept alive till the date
of performance of contract-Here the
damage will be on the date of performance
1-Ordinary or general damages-Damages
parties are ought to know
2-Special damages-Resulting from breach
of contract
3-Exemplary damages-Shows the Court’s
disapproval
4-Nominal damages- Contemptuous
damages
1 Reasonable and proportionate-The
amount involved
2-Fair and Genuine-the damage is fair and
genuine
3-Object-To secure compensation
4-Recovery through Court-Are permitted
by Court
5-Court,s Power-Courts have no power to
1-Reasonable and Proportionate-The
amount is reasonable
2-Fair and Genuine-The damage is fair
estimate
3-Object-To secure compensation
4-Recoverable through Court-Liquidated
Damages are permitted by Court
5-Court’s Power-Court’s have no power to
I-In case of voidable contracts ( Sec 64 )-
The contracts becomes voidable
ii-In case of contract becoming void (
Sec 65 )-When an agreement is discovered
to be void
i-Where monetary compensation is an
adequate remedy
ii-Where the court cannot supervise the
execution of the contract
iii-Where the contract is for personal service
iv-Where one of the parties is incompetent
to contract
v- Where the contract is ultra vires
vi- Where the contract is made by Trustees
in breach of trust
vii-Where a subject material part of the
subject matter of the contract has ceased to
exist
viii-Where the contract is inequitable to
either party
1- This right does not arise out of any
contract but it is of quasi- contractual nature
2-This right arises out of some past
performance a)- some work is done)-some
services are rendered.
3-It is by nature restitutory
4-It arises when a quasi- contract is in
existence
1-This right arises out of a contract
2-This right arises when there is non-
performance
3-It is by nature compensatory
4-It arises only when a contract is broken
“Like” us on Facebook: 
   p //                 /
http://www.facebook.com/welearnindia 

“Follow” us on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/WeLearnIndia
http://twitter com/WeLearnIndia

Watch informative videos on Youtube: 
http://www.youtube.com/WelingkarDLP

Discharge and Performance of Contracts

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Performance may be i-Actualperformance-When both the parties perform their respective promises, a contract is said to have been actually performed ii-Attempted performance-offer to perform may be called Attempted performance Offer to perform is called ‘ Tender of
  • 3.
    1- Tender mustbe unconditional 2-tender must be made at a proper time and place 3-Tender must be made under such circumstances that the person to whom it is made may have a reasonable opportunity of ascertaining that the person by whom it is made is able and willing to fulfill the whole of promise
  • 4.
    4-If the offeris an offer to deliver anything to the promisee,the promisee must have a reasonable opportunity of seeing that the thing offered is the thing which the promisor is bound to deliver 5- The Tender must be whole and not only the part 6-Tender must be made to the promisee or his duly authorized agent 7-Tender made to one of several promises has the same effect as a tender to all of
  • 5.
    8-If any promiseeneglects or refuses to afford the promisor reasonable facilities for the performance of the promisee 9-The Tender must be in proper form 10-The party making a Tender must be ready and willing to fulfill the obligation whenever called upon 11-A mere offer by post to pay the amount is not a valid tender 12-A Tender may either be Tender of goods
  • 6.
    1-Promisee-A third partycan not demand the performance 2-Legal Representative-In the case of death of promisee , the Legal representative can demand performance 3-Joint Promisees –When a person has made a promise to two or more persons 4-Third Party-A third party can demand
  • 7.
    1-By the Parties-Asper section 37 of the Act 2-Promisor-As per section 40 of the Act 3-Representatives-As per section 37 4-Agent-As per section 40 5-Third person-As per section 41
  • 8.
    1- Where notime is specified 2-When time is specified 3-On application for performance by promisee
  • 9.
    1-Mutual and Dependent-Performanceof one party depends upon the prior performance of other party 2-Mutual and Independent-each party must perform independently 3-Mutual and Concurrent-Promise has to be performed simultaneously.
  • 10.
    1-Express appropriation byDebtor 2-Implied appropriation by debtor 3-Principal and Interest when both are due 4-Apporpriation by Creditor 5-Apporpriation by Law 6-The rule in re Hallett’s estate
  • 11.
    i-If the partiesto a contract agree to substitute a new contract ii- Promisee may dispense with or remit wholly or part, the performance of a promise made by him iii-When a person at whose option a contract is voidable rescinds it. iv-If any promisee neglects or refuses to afford the promisor reasonable facilities
  • 12.
    v-When a contractbecomes void because of supervening impossibility or illegality vi-When a person has a right to rescind a contract vii-When a promisor is excused by any other law
  • 13.
    i-Novation or Substitution-Somenew contract got substituted ii-Alteration-Change in terms of contract iii- Rescission-If the parties agree to rescind it iv-Remission--Acceptance of lesser sum compared to the original contract v-Waiver-To dispense with vi-Merger-When superior right and inferior
  • 14.
    1-Insolvency-The promisor isdischarged 2-Merger-Extinguishesing the right 3-Death-The death of the promisor discharges the contract 4-Lapse of time-The Limitation Act 1963 5-Material alteration or unauthorized alteration-Change in one or more of the material terms of contract
  • 15.
    Meaning-According to Sec56, impossibility of performance may fall into i-Impossibilty existing at the time of contract known as pre-contractual or initial impossibility ii-Subsequent or supervening impossibility also known as post- contractual impossibility
  • 16.
    1-Destruction of theobject necessary for the performance of the contract 2-Change of law 3-Personal incapacity 4-Outbreak of war
  • 17.
    1-Difficulty of performance 2-CommercialImpossibility 3-Impossibilty due to the behavior of a third party 4-Self induced impossibility 5-Strikes, Lockouts ,and Civil disturbances 6-Partial impossibility 7-Rights and obligations under a transfer of property under a case 8-Temporary interruptio9-Matters with the contemplation of parties
  • 18.
    1-Actual breach ofcontract-At the time when the performance id due 2-Anticipatory Breach of contract-By renunciation
  • 19.
    1-If the contractedis ended at once-The amount of damages will be measured by the difference between the prices prevailing on the date of breach 2-If the contract is kept alive till the date of performance of contract-Here the damage will be on the date of performance
  • 20.
    1-Ordinary or generaldamages-Damages parties are ought to know 2-Special damages-Resulting from breach of contract 3-Exemplary damages-Shows the Court’s disapproval 4-Nominal damages- Contemptuous damages
  • 21.
    1 Reasonable andproportionate-The amount involved 2-Fair and Genuine-the damage is fair and genuine 3-Object-To secure compensation 4-Recovery through Court-Are permitted by Court 5-Court,s Power-Courts have no power to
  • 22.
    1-Reasonable and Proportionate-The amountis reasonable 2-Fair and Genuine-The damage is fair estimate 3-Object-To secure compensation 4-Recoverable through Court-Liquidated Damages are permitted by Court 5-Court’s Power-Court’s have no power to
  • 23.
    I-In case ofvoidable contracts ( Sec 64 )- The contracts becomes voidable ii-In case of contract becoming void ( Sec 65 )-When an agreement is discovered to be void
  • 24.
    i-Where monetary compensationis an adequate remedy ii-Where the court cannot supervise the execution of the contract iii-Where the contract is for personal service iv-Where one of the parties is incompetent to contract v- Where the contract is ultra vires
  • 25.
    vi- Where thecontract is made by Trustees in breach of trust vii-Where a subject material part of the subject matter of the contract has ceased to exist viii-Where the contract is inequitable to either party
  • 26.
    1- This rightdoes not arise out of any contract but it is of quasi- contractual nature 2-This right arises out of some past performance a)- some work is done)-some services are rendered. 3-It is by nature restitutory 4-It arises when a quasi- contract is in existence
  • 27.
    1-This right arisesout of a contract 2-This right arises when there is non- performance 3-It is by nature compensatory 4-It arises only when a contract is broken
  • 28.
    “Like” us on Facebook:  p // / http://www.facebook.com/welearnindia  “Follow” us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/WeLearnIndia http://twitter com/WeLearnIndia Watch informative videos on Youtube:  http://www.youtube.com/WelingkarDLP