parsonsbehle.com
May 14, 2024 | The Grand America Hotel – Salt Lake City
Drugs and Alcohol in the Workplace
Susan Baird Motschiedler
2
This presentation is based on available information as of May 14,
2024, but everyone must understand that the information provided is
not a substitute for legal advice. This presentation is not intended and
will not serve as a substitute for legal counsel on these issues.
Legal Disclaimer
3
Informal Audience Survey
 Do you have a drug testing policy?
o Written
o Signed by Employee
 Do you not have a drug testing policy?
o Do you test anyway?
 Do you not test for marijuana?
o Industrial work force?
 Have you had an increase in the past 5 years of drug or alcohol use
impacting the workplace?
 Which causes more problems in the workplace: marijuana, alcohol,
or other
4
Medical
Marijuana
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization:1996
5
Medical
Marijuana
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 1998
6
Medical
Marijuana
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 1999
7
Medical
Marijuana
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2000
8
Medical
Marijuana
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2003
9
Medical
Marijuana
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2004
10
Medical
Marijuana
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2007
11
Medical
Marijuana
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2008
12
Medical
Marijuana
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2009
13
Medical
Marijuana
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2010
14
Medical
Marijuana
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2011
15
Medical
Marijuana
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2012
Recreational
Marijuana
16
Medical
Marijuana
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2013
Recreational
Marijuana
17
Medical
Marijuana
CBD
Oil
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2014
Recreational
Marijuana
18
Medical
Marijuana
CBD
Oil
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2015
Recreational
Marijuana
19
Medical
Marijuana
CBD
Oil
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2016
Recreational
Marijuana
20
Medical
Marijuana
CBD
Oil
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2017
Recreational
Marijuana
21
Medical
Marijuana
CBD
Oil
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2018
Recreational
Marijuana
22
Medical
Marijuana
CBD
Oil
Evolution of Marijuana Legalization: 2019
Recreational
Marijuana
23
Were is Marijuana Legal Today?
24
Current Opinions on Marijuana in the U.S.
25
Current Opinions on Marijuana in the U.S.
 50.3% of U.S. adults say they have used
marijuana at least once, ever
 84.1% of U.S. adults say they have
consumed alcohol at least once, ever
 23.0% of adults have used marijuana in the
past year
 15.9% of adults have used marijuana in the
past month
 Of adults who drink alcohol:
o 69% had a drink within the last week
o 32% had a drink within the last 24 hours
26
Trends in Marijuana and the Workplace
 NYC ban on employer preemployment drug testing, April 2019.
 Only Half of CO Employers Will Fire for a Single Pot Test, Denver
Post, March 2019.
 Quest Diagnostics Study, April 11, 2019:
o Workforce drug testing positivity climbs to highest rate since 2004.
o 2.8% of workers test positive for marijuana nationwide, up from 2.4% in
2014.
27
Trends in Court Cases and Marijuana and the Workplace
 Judicial interpretation trending more favorably to employees
o Before 2017 (outside of workers’ compensation and unemployment),
employers won each case brought based on alleged violation of right to use
medical marijuana.
• Washburn v. Columbia Forest Products, Inc., (Or. 2006)
• Ross v. RagingWire Telecomms., Inc. (Cal. 2008)
• Johnson v. Columbia Falls Aluminum Co., LLC (Mont. 2009)
• Emerald Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries (Or. 2010)
• Roe v. Teletech Customer Care Mgmt. LLC (Wash. 2011)
• Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (6th Cir. 2012) (construing Mich. law)
• Savage v. Maine Pretrial Services, Inc. (Me. 2013)
• Coats v. Dish Network, LLC, 350 P.3d 849 (Colo. 2015)
28
Trends in Court Cases and Marijuana and the Workplace
 After 2017, employers have lost almost every such case.
o Callaghan v. Darlington Fabrics Corp. (R.I. Superior Ct. 2017)
The judge started the opinion with the Beatles song quote “I get high with a little help from
my friends.
o Barbuto v. Advantage Sales & Marketing, LLC (Mass 2017)
o Noffsinger v. SSC Niantic Operating Co., LLC (D. Conn. 2017)
o Chance v. Kraft Heinz Food’s Co. (Del. Superior Ct. 2018)
o Wild v Carriage Funeral Holdings, Inc. (N.J. App. Div. 2019)
But see Cotto v. Ardagh Glass Packaging, (D.N.J. 2018)
How Does this Affect You?
30
Must Employers Accommodate Medical Marijuana?
 Under Federal Law, Marijuana remains illegal.
 Under Utah Law:
o Medical Marijuana is legal
o Recreational Marijuana is not legal.
 Neighboring states have some level of legality:
o Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico
 Neighboring states where cannabis remains illegal:
o Wyoming and Idaho
31
 Qualifying Conditions for a Medical Cannabis Card in UT:
Must Employers Accommodate Medical Marijuana?
o HIV or acquired immune deficiency
syndrome
o Alzheimer's disease
o Cancer
o Persistent nausea that is not
significantly responsive to
traditional treatment, except for
nausea related to pregnancy or
various conditions.
o Epilepsy or debilitating seizures
o Multiple sclerosis or persistent and
debilitating muscle spasms
o Post-traumatic stress disorder that
is being treated and monitored by a
licensed mental health therapist
o Autism
o A terminal illness when the
patient's remaining life expectancy
is less than six months
o Pain lasting longer than two weeks
that is not adequately managed
with various treatments
32
 Public vs. Private in Utah
o Public Employers MUST Accommodate Medical Marijuana Usage
o Utah Medical Cannabis Act : state and political subdivision employees
cannot be discriminated against on the basis of their use of medical
cannabis, as long as they are otherwise in compliance with the law.
• Cannabis card
• No evidence of impaired or otherwise adversely affected job performance due to
medical cannabis usage
o 34A-5-115. Nondiscrimination for medical cannabis use while
employed by the government -- Medical cannabis and prescription
use.
Must Employers Accommodate Medical Marijuana?
33
 However, private employees’ medical cannabis use is not
protected under the Utah Medical Cannabis Act.
 Although private employers do not have to accommodate, should
you?
 The top questions that clients ask about Drug Testing is:
o Can I drug test for serious stuff like cocaine, meth, etc. and not test for
marijuana?
o Can I have different testing requirements for different parts of my
workforce?
Must Employers Accommodate Medical Marijuana?
34
 How is Marijuana different from Alcohol?
 Problem with testing for Marijuana/THC:
o Does not test for impairment
o THC stays in the system for a long time after use
o So: the user can test positive but not be impaired
• Same with cocaine, amphetamines, prescription drugs, but has a much longer half life
in the body
• Testing sensitivity varies wildly
o May not always differentiate between THC and CBD
Drug-Testing Considerations for Current and
Prospective Employees
35
 Tests are getting more practical:
o Portable (testing “in the field”)
o Detect level of THC and can determine impairment levels, similar to a
breathalyzer or BAC test
o Some states are identifying THC thresholds: 5ng/mL
 Not necessarily widely available
 Some are marketed as medical devices for medical marijuana users
Drug-Testing Considerations for Current and
Prospective Employees
36
 Legal and Practical Considerations:
o Federally Regulated Employees:
• DOT- mandated testing
• Federal Contractors and Grant Recipients
o Workplace Safety: Federal or State MSHA and OSHA
o Other Workplace Enforcement Concerns
• Public Policy
• Policing Outside-of-Work Activities
o At-will vs. For-Cause (employment agreements) vs. Just Cause (Collective
Bargaining Agreements)
Drug-Testing Considerations for Current and
Prospective Employees
37
 Workers’ Compensation
 Unemployment Benefits
 Issues with types of drug testing:
o Pre-employment v. post-hire
o Random
o Suspicion of Impairment
o Post Accident
 Market Forces
 Company Culture
Drug-Testing Considerations for Current and
Prospective Employees
38
Drug Free Workplace Act (federal contractors/grant recipients)
 Develop and publish a written policy that prohibits manufacture, use,
distributions in the workplace; ensure that employees read and consent to it as
condition to employment.
 Establish a drug-free awareness program to educate employees of the dangers
of drug abuse.
 Require notifications from employees within 5 days of a criminal drug conviction.
 Notify the federal contracting agency within 10 days of any covered violation.
 Does not require drug tests and does not prohibit drug use OUTSIDE of the
workplace.
Drug-Testing Considerations for Current and
Prospective Employees
39
Department of Transportation:
 The Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act requires DOT Agencies to
implement drug & alcohol testing of safety-sensitive transportation employees.
 DOT-regulated drug testing is not changed by state laws permitting medical
marijuana.
 Medical Review Officers will still treat as positive test.
Drug-Testing Considerations for Current and
Prospective Employees
40
Drug-Testing Considerations for Current and
Prospective Employees
OSHA General Duty Clause
 Employers can still expect employees to work to the required standards.
o Marijuana laws do not diminish need for a safe, productive workplace.
 But off-duty use is not a violation of the OSHA general duty clause.
 Post-incident drug testing policies must be consistent or will be considered
retaliatory.
 OSHA allows Injury Illness Prevention Programs to address Medical Marijuana
P. Gillespie’s Article: State Medical Marijuana Legalization and OSHA Anti-Retaliation Rules: Post
Accident Drug Testing Consideration for Employers (SciTech Lawyer, Vol 13 No. 3, 2017).
41
Disciplining and Terminating Medical Marijuana
Users: Current Legal Perspectives
 Some States specifically protect legal medical marijuana users under the
state’s disability act
o Must accommodate unless undue burden
o AZ, NM, NV have express accommodation or non-discrimination provisions
 Don’t have to allow possession on the job
 Don’t have to allow influence or impairment on the job
 Safety sensitive positions or tasks, such as heaving machine operators,
driving, handling medicine or regulated chemicals, or working in high or
confined spaces
 Where may constitute negligence, professional negligence, or
professional misconduct.
42
Disciplining and Terminating Medical Marijuana
Users: Current Legal Perspectives
Legal Considerations:
 Federal Law Enforcement has decreased enforcement.
 Many states have signaled they will not enforce federal laws and have
none/have modified/do not enforce possession and use.
 U.S. public sentiment towards marijuana usage has changed.
 In the last 20 years, judicial interpretation of medical marijuana usage (outside
UT) appears to be trending more favorably to employees in the last 20 years.
 Potential for ADA case down the road.
43
Disciplining and Terminating Medical Marijuana
Users: Current Legal Perspectives
Practical Considerations:
 There is a worker shortage.
 Some good workers use medical marijuana.
 Consider business needs/culture – drivers, operators, safety, image.
 Are you a multi-state employer in a state that has different laws?
 Consider testing and disciplining for other drugs, but not marijuana.
 Rely on fitness for duty and objective criteria to measure impairment on the job.
44
 If you drug and alcohol test, you must have a written policy that
tracks information in the Utah Drug Testing Statute.
 Must identify what type of testing you will do:
o Post hire, random, post accident, regular, etc.
o If you do random, must include supervisors
 Make clear what you are testing for – marijuana,
methamphetamines, all the new variants of gas station drugs.
Creating Drug and Alcohol Policies That Leave No
Room for Interpretation
45
 If you include marijuana in your testing panel, be clear whether
medical marijuana is included.
 If you will accommodate medical marijuana and a failed test, be
clear how you will accomplish that:
o Request for an accommodation?
• Safety sensitive positions?
• Potential undue hardship?
o Excuse a positive on appeal?
Creating Drug and Alcohol Policies That Leave No
Room for Interpretation
46
 Consider reasonable suspicion/post accident testing instead of
mandatory or random.
 Make clear the policy for usage among on-call employees.
o Does the type of position matter?
• IT after hours help vs. EMT or ER MD
 Consider reasonable suspicion instead of mandatory.
o Train how to recognize impairment – poor concentration, dilated pupils,
impaired perception, abnormal behavior, slurred speech or movement,
gloss eyes, slow responses or reflexes, smell of marijuana or alcohol.
 Use/possession at work grounds for termination.
Creating Drug and Alcohol Policies That Leave No
Room for Interpretation
47
 Keep drug and alcohol policy updated.
o Be specific; e.g., clarify federal and state law, not just “legally prescribed.”
o Address prescription medication that may affect ability to work.
o Define impairment based on observable characteristics.
o Consequences for refusal to submit to testing.
 Know handbook and policies.
o Apply uniformly.
o Publicize your policy and train supervisors.
o Sign receipt of the policy.
 Consider accommodation process.
Creating Drug and Alcohol Policies That Leave No
Room for Interpretation
Thank You
You can scan the QR code or visit
parsonsbehle.com/emp-seminar
to download a PDF handbook of
today’s seminar.
49
Thank You
 Susan Baird Motschiedler
smotschiedler@parsonsbehle.com
801.536.6923

Drugs and Alcohol in the Workplace - 2025 SLC

  • 1.
    parsonsbehle.com May 14, 2024| The Grand America Hotel – Salt Lake City Drugs and Alcohol in the Workplace Susan Baird Motschiedler
  • 2.
    2 This presentation isbased on available information as of May 14, 2024, but everyone must understand that the information provided is not a substitute for legal advice. This presentation is not intended and will not serve as a substitute for legal counsel on these issues. Legal Disclaimer
  • 3.
    3 Informal Audience Survey Do you have a drug testing policy? o Written o Signed by Employee  Do you not have a drug testing policy? o Do you test anyway?  Do you not test for marijuana? o Industrial work force?  Have you had an increase in the past 5 years of drug or alcohol use impacting the workplace?  Which causes more problems in the workplace: marijuana, alcohol, or other
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
    15 Medical Marijuana Evolution of MarijuanaLegalization: 2012 Recreational Marijuana
  • 16.
    16 Medical Marijuana Evolution of MarijuanaLegalization: 2013 Recreational Marijuana
  • 17.
    17 Medical Marijuana CBD Oil Evolution of MarijuanaLegalization: 2014 Recreational Marijuana
  • 18.
    18 Medical Marijuana CBD Oil Evolution of MarijuanaLegalization: 2015 Recreational Marijuana
  • 19.
    19 Medical Marijuana CBD Oil Evolution of MarijuanaLegalization: 2016 Recreational Marijuana
  • 20.
    20 Medical Marijuana CBD Oil Evolution of MarijuanaLegalization: 2017 Recreational Marijuana
  • 21.
    21 Medical Marijuana CBD Oil Evolution of MarijuanaLegalization: 2018 Recreational Marijuana
  • 22.
    22 Medical Marijuana CBD Oil Evolution of MarijuanaLegalization: 2019 Recreational Marijuana
  • 23.
  • 24.
    24 Current Opinions onMarijuana in the U.S.
  • 25.
    25 Current Opinions onMarijuana in the U.S.  50.3% of U.S. adults say they have used marijuana at least once, ever  84.1% of U.S. adults say they have consumed alcohol at least once, ever  23.0% of adults have used marijuana in the past year  15.9% of adults have used marijuana in the past month  Of adults who drink alcohol: o 69% had a drink within the last week o 32% had a drink within the last 24 hours
  • 26.
    26 Trends in Marijuanaand the Workplace  NYC ban on employer preemployment drug testing, April 2019.  Only Half of CO Employers Will Fire for a Single Pot Test, Denver Post, March 2019.  Quest Diagnostics Study, April 11, 2019: o Workforce drug testing positivity climbs to highest rate since 2004. o 2.8% of workers test positive for marijuana nationwide, up from 2.4% in 2014.
  • 27.
    27 Trends in CourtCases and Marijuana and the Workplace  Judicial interpretation trending more favorably to employees o Before 2017 (outside of workers’ compensation and unemployment), employers won each case brought based on alleged violation of right to use medical marijuana. • Washburn v. Columbia Forest Products, Inc., (Or. 2006) • Ross v. RagingWire Telecomms., Inc. (Cal. 2008) • Johnson v. Columbia Falls Aluminum Co., LLC (Mont. 2009) • Emerald Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries (Or. 2010) • Roe v. Teletech Customer Care Mgmt. LLC (Wash. 2011) • Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (6th Cir. 2012) (construing Mich. law) • Savage v. Maine Pretrial Services, Inc. (Me. 2013) • Coats v. Dish Network, LLC, 350 P.3d 849 (Colo. 2015)
  • 28.
    28 Trends in CourtCases and Marijuana and the Workplace  After 2017, employers have lost almost every such case. o Callaghan v. Darlington Fabrics Corp. (R.I. Superior Ct. 2017) The judge started the opinion with the Beatles song quote “I get high with a little help from my friends. o Barbuto v. Advantage Sales & Marketing, LLC (Mass 2017) o Noffsinger v. SSC Niantic Operating Co., LLC (D. Conn. 2017) o Chance v. Kraft Heinz Food’s Co. (Del. Superior Ct. 2018) o Wild v Carriage Funeral Holdings, Inc. (N.J. App. Div. 2019) But see Cotto v. Ardagh Glass Packaging, (D.N.J. 2018)
  • 29.
    How Does thisAffect You?
  • 30.
    30 Must Employers AccommodateMedical Marijuana?  Under Federal Law, Marijuana remains illegal.  Under Utah Law: o Medical Marijuana is legal o Recreational Marijuana is not legal.  Neighboring states have some level of legality: o Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico  Neighboring states where cannabis remains illegal: o Wyoming and Idaho
  • 31.
    31  Qualifying Conditionsfor a Medical Cannabis Card in UT: Must Employers Accommodate Medical Marijuana? o HIV or acquired immune deficiency syndrome o Alzheimer's disease o Cancer o Persistent nausea that is not significantly responsive to traditional treatment, except for nausea related to pregnancy or various conditions. o Epilepsy or debilitating seizures o Multiple sclerosis or persistent and debilitating muscle spasms o Post-traumatic stress disorder that is being treated and monitored by a licensed mental health therapist o Autism o A terminal illness when the patient's remaining life expectancy is less than six months o Pain lasting longer than two weeks that is not adequately managed with various treatments
  • 32.
    32  Public vs.Private in Utah o Public Employers MUST Accommodate Medical Marijuana Usage o Utah Medical Cannabis Act : state and political subdivision employees cannot be discriminated against on the basis of their use of medical cannabis, as long as they are otherwise in compliance with the law. • Cannabis card • No evidence of impaired or otherwise adversely affected job performance due to medical cannabis usage o 34A-5-115. Nondiscrimination for medical cannabis use while employed by the government -- Medical cannabis and prescription use. Must Employers Accommodate Medical Marijuana?
  • 33.
    33  However, privateemployees’ medical cannabis use is not protected under the Utah Medical Cannabis Act.  Although private employers do not have to accommodate, should you?  The top questions that clients ask about Drug Testing is: o Can I drug test for serious stuff like cocaine, meth, etc. and not test for marijuana? o Can I have different testing requirements for different parts of my workforce? Must Employers Accommodate Medical Marijuana?
  • 34.
    34  How isMarijuana different from Alcohol?  Problem with testing for Marijuana/THC: o Does not test for impairment o THC stays in the system for a long time after use o So: the user can test positive but not be impaired • Same with cocaine, amphetamines, prescription drugs, but has a much longer half life in the body • Testing sensitivity varies wildly o May not always differentiate between THC and CBD Drug-Testing Considerations for Current and Prospective Employees
  • 35.
    35  Tests aregetting more practical: o Portable (testing “in the field”) o Detect level of THC and can determine impairment levels, similar to a breathalyzer or BAC test o Some states are identifying THC thresholds: 5ng/mL  Not necessarily widely available  Some are marketed as medical devices for medical marijuana users Drug-Testing Considerations for Current and Prospective Employees
  • 36.
    36  Legal andPractical Considerations: o Federally Regulated Employees: • DOT- mandated testing • Federal Contractors and Grant Recipients o Workplace Safety: Federal or State MSHA and OSHA o Other Workplace Enforcement Concerns • Public Policy • Policing Outside-of-Work Activities o At-will vs. For-Cause (employment agreements) vs. Just Cause (Collective Bargaining Agreements) Drug-Testing Considerations for Current and Prospective Employees
  • 37.
    37  Workers’ Compensation Unemployment Benefits  Issues with types of drug testing: o Pre-employment v. post-hire o Random o Suspicion of Impairment o Post Accident  Market Forces  Company Culture Drug-Testing Considerations for Current and Prospective Employees
  • 38.
    38 Drug Free WorkplaceAct (federal contractors/grant recipients)  Develop and publish a written policy that prohibits manufacture, use, distributions in the workplace; ensure that employees read and consent to it as condition to employment.  Establish a drug-free awareness program to educate employees of the dangers of drug abuse.  Require notifications from employees within 5 days of a criminal drug conviction.  Notify the federal contracting agency within 10 days of any covered violation.  Does not require drug tests and does not prohibit drug use OUTSIDE of the workplace. Drug-Testing Considerations for Current and Prospective Employees
  • 39.
    39 Department of Transportation: The Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act requires DOT Agencies to implement drug & alcohol testing of safety-sensitive transportation employees.  DOT-regulated drug testing is not changed by state laws permitting medical marijuana.  Medical Review Officers will still treat as positive test. Drug-Testing Considerations for Current and Prospective Employees
  • 40.
    40 Drug-Testing Considerations forCurrent and Prospective Employees OSHA General Duty Clause  Employers can still expect employees to work to the required standards. o Marijuana laws do not diminish need for a safe, productive workplace.  But off-duty use is not a violation of the OSHA general duty clause.  Post-incident drug testing policies must be consistent or will be considered retaliatory.  OSHA allows Injury Illness Prevention Programs to address Medical Marijuana P. Gillespie’s Article: State Medical Marijuana Legalization and OSHA Anti-Retaliation Rules: Post Accident Drug Testing Consideration for Employers (SciTech Lawyer, Vol 13 No. 3, 2017).
  • 41.
    41 Disciplining and TerminatingMedical Marijuana Users: Current Legal Perspectives  Some States specifically protect legal medical marijuana users under the state’s disability act o Must accommodate unless undue burden o AZ, NM, NV have express accommodation or non-discrimination provisions  Don’t have to allow possession on the job  Don’t have to allow influence or impairment on the job  Safety sensitive positions or tasks, such as heaving machine operators, driving, handling medicine or regulated chemicals, or working in high or confined spaces  Where may constitute negligence, professional negligence, or professional misconduct.
  • 42.
    42 Disciplining and TerminatingMedical Marijuana Users: Current Legal Perspectives Legal Considerations:  Federal Law Enforcement has decreased enforcement.  Many states have signaled they will not enforce federal laws and have none/have modified/do not enforce possession and use.  U.S. public sentiment towards marijuana usage has changed.  In the last 20 years, judicial interpretation of medical marijuana usage (outside UT) appears to be trending more favorably to employees in the last 20 years.  Potential for ADA case down the road.
  • 43.
    43 Disciplining and TerminatingMedical Marijuana Users: Current Legal Perspectives Practical Considerations:  There is a worker shortage.  Some good workers use medical marijuana.  Consider business needs/culture – drivers, operators, safety, image.  Are you a multi-state employer in a state that has different laws?  Consider testing and disciplining for other drugs, but not marijuana.  Rely on fitness for duty and objective criteria to measure impairment on the job.
  • 44.
    44  If youdrug and alcohol test, you must have a written policy that tracks information in the Utah Drug Testing Statute.  Must identify what type of testing you will do: o Post hire, random, post accident, regular, etc. o If you do random, must include supervisors  Make clear what you are testing for – marijuana, methamphetamines, all the new variants of gas station drugs. Creating Drug and Alcohol Policies That Leave No Room for Interpretation
  • 45.
    45  If youinclude marijuana in your testing panel, be clear whether medical marijuana is included.  If you will accommodate medical marijuana and a failed test, be clear how you will accomplish that: o Request for an accommodation? • Safety sensitive positions? • Potential undue hardship? o Excuse a positive on appeal? Creating Drug and Alcohol Policies That Leave No Room for Interpretation
  • 46.
    46  Consider reasonablesuspicion/post accident testing instead of mandatory or random.  Make clear the policy for usage among on-call employees. o Does the type of position matter? • IT after hours help vs. EMT or ER MD  Consider reasonable suspicion instead of mandatory. o Train how to recognize impairment – poor concentration, dilated pupils, impaired perception, abnormal behavior, slurred speech or movement, gloss eyes, slow responses or reflexes, smell of marijuana or alcohol.  Use/possession at work grounds for termination. Creating Drug and Alcohol Policies That Leave No Room for Interpretation
  • 47.
    47  Keep drugand alcohol policy updated. o Be specific; e.g., clarify federal and state law, not just “legally prescribed.” o Address prescription medication that may affect ability to work. o Define impairment based on observable characteristics. o Consequences for refusal to submit to testing.  Know handbook and policies. o Apply uniformly. o Publicize your policy and train supervisors. o Sign receipt of the policy.  Consider accommodation process. Creating Drug and Alcohol Policies That Leave No Room for Interpretation
  • 48.
    Thank You You canscan the QR code or visit parsonsbehle.com/emp-seminar to download a PDF handbook of today’s seminar.
  • 49.
    49 Thank You  SusanBaird Motschiedler [email protected] 801.536.6923

Editor's Notes

  • #4 It starts in California.
  • #5 Two years later, California is joined by Oregon, Washington, and Alaska.
  • #6 Maine
  • #7 Colorado, Hawaii, and Nevada
  • #8 Maryland
  • #9 Montana and Vermont
  • #10 New Mexico and Rhode Island
  • #11 Michigan
  • #12 New Jersey
  • #13 Arizona
  • #14 Delaware
  • #15 Big year: MM statutes enacted by Connecticut and Massachusetts AND Recreational Marijuana statutes enacted by Colorado and Washington.
  • #16 Illinois and New Hampshire
  • #17 2014 – Medical Marijuana statutes enacted by Minnesota and New York. AND Here come the CBD laws: Alabama Florida Iowa Kentucky Mississippi Missouri North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee And finally, Utah
  • #18 More CBD laws in Georgia Oklahoma Texas Virginia AND Wyoming
  • #19 Medical Marijuana laws enacted by Arkansas, Florida, North Dakota, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Recreational Marijuana laws enacted by California, Nevada, Massachusetts, and Maine
  • #20 Medical Marijuana: Louisiana and West Virginia And CBD by Indiana
  • #21 Medical Marijuana in Missouri, Utah Recreational Marijuana in Michigan and Vermont
  • #22 And, in 2019, Illinois joins the recreational use states. This exercise was good for my national geography. So, who is left without significant legalization of some form of marijuana?: Idaho, South Dakota, Nebraska, and Kansas.