Presented by
Margie Mullins
&
Elizabeth Pendergraph
 A makeover for math class
 High School Math teacher
 Sells a product to a market that doesn’t want it but is

forced to buy it.
 He expects no higher than a 25% pass rate if he gave
an algebra exam
Computation

Math Reasoning

 The stuff we as adults

 The application of math

have forgotten
 For example, factoring
quadratic equations
 Also easy to relearn
provided you have a very
strong grounding in math
reasoning

processes to the world
around us
 What we would love
students to retain even if
they don’t go into
mathematical fields
 The way we teach it in the
U.S. ensures we won’t
retain it
 Lack of initiative: students don’t self-start
 Lack of perseverance
 Lack of retention: You have to re-explain concepts
 Aversion to word problems
 Eagerness for formula
 Present a visual
 Ask a question
 Encourage discussion
 Apply labels and measurements
 Apply mathematical structure
 Develop sub steps to solve
“The formulation of a problem is often more essential
than its solution, which may be merely a matter of
mathematical or experimental skill.” –Albert Einstein
 Use multimedia
 Encourage student intuition
 Ask the shortest question you can
 Let students build the problem
 Be less helpful
 Against “Answer-Getting”
 Ordinary teacher developing high performance

teachers in Japan
 High performing teachers producing ordinary
student in USA
 USA teachers teach for students to get answers
 Japan teachers teach to the mathematics for the

student to be able to solve the problem
 Math is suppose to taught for students to learn
mathematics
 Why solve problems?
 Answers are the product
 Answers are a part of the process

 Correct answers
 Are important

 Should not be solve mission
 Is a opportunity to find out why the answer is

incorrect
 Helps student to see the problem differently
 Gives an opportunity to clarify the mathematics of
the problem
 Student don’t try to understand the problem
 They try to make anything come out even
 There is no need to make sense of the problem just

get a even answer and move on
 Dan Meyer: Math class needs a makeover | Video on

TED.com. 2013. Dan Meyer: Math class needs a
makeover | Video on TED.com. [ONLINE] Available
at:
http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_meyer_math_curric
ulum_makeover.html. [Accessed 26 October 2013].
 Phil Daro - Against "Answer-Getting" on Vimeo.
2013. Phil Daro - Against "Answer-Getting" on
Vimeo. [ONLINE] Available at:
http://vimeo.com/30924981. [Accessed 26 October
2013].

Edel 461 powerpoint

  • 1.
  • 2.
     A makeoverfor math class
  • 3.
     High SchoolMath teacher  Sells a product to a market that doesn’t want it but is forced to buy it.  He expects no higher than a 25% pass rate if he gave an algebra exam
  • 4.
    Computation Math Reasoning  Thestuff we as adults  The application of math have forgotten  For example, factoring quadratic equations  Also easy to relearn provided you have a very strong grounding in math reasoning processes to the world around us  What we would love students to retain even if they don’t go into mathematical fields  The way we teach it in the U.S. ensures we won’t retain it
  • 5.
     Lack ofinitiative: students don’t self-start  Lack of perseverance  Lack of retention: You have to re-explain concepts  Aversion to word problems  Eagerness for formula
  • 6.
     Present avisual  Ask a question  Encourage discussion  Apply labels and measurements  Apply mathematical structure  Develop sub steps to solve
  • 7.
    “The formulation ofa problem is often more essential than its solution, which may be merely a matter of mathematical or experimental skill.” –Albert Einstein
  • 8.
     Use multimedia Encourage student intuition  Ask the shortest question you can  Let students build the problem  Be less helpful
  • 9.
     Against “Answer-Getting” Ordinary teacher developing high performance teachers in Japan  High performing teachers producing ordinary student in USA
  • 10.
     USA teachersteach for students to get answers  Japan teachers teach to the mathematics for the student to be able to solve the problem  Math is suppose to taught for students to learn mathematics
  • 11.
     Why solveproblems?  Answers are the product  Answers are a part of the process  Correct answers  Are important  Should not be solve mission
  • 12.
     Is aopportunity to find out why the answer is incorrect  Helps student to see the problem differently  Gives an opportunity to clarify the mathematics of the problem
  • 13.
     Student don’ttry to understand the problem  They try to make anything come out even  There is no need to make sense of the problem just get a even answer and move on
  • 14.
     Dan Meyer:Math class needs a makeover | Video on TED.com. 2013. Dan Meyer: Math class needs a makeover | Video on TED.com. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_meyer_math_curric ulum_makeover.html. [Accessed 26 October 2013].  Phil Daro - Against "Answer-Getting" on Vimeo. 2013. Phil Daro - Against "Answer-Getting" on Vimeo. [ONLINE] Available at: http://vimeo.com/30924981. [Accessed 26 October 2013].