Education for Economic Success: New Strategies for Higher Education Dirk Van Damme Head of the Centre for Educational Research and Innovation at the OECD, Paris
Outline Some starting points and questions Contexts of change: trends and policies Diverging rationales and resistance to change Four scenario’s for higher education’s future The need for new strategies And technology…?
Starting points and questions Despite high degree of technology adoption, massive impact of globalisation and continued massification, universities in general have not radically transformed their operation and delivery model. Increasing and diversifying demand and participation will continue to challenge prevailing models. Economic and fiscal crisis will lead to increased policy demands for excellence, efficiency and accountability. Will this create an environment of innovation and reform leading to new models of higher education?
Contexts Main  trends : Continued  expansion  of higher education systems in access and participation;  demand  will remain high More  heterogeneous  student population Institutional  diversification More challenging and  insecure  funding Increased  competition  for resources and output, including for academics on a competitive market In an increasingly  global  context of networking, mobility and collaboration
Contexts Main  policy directions : Policy frameworks (theoretically) exchanging more institutional  autonomy  for  accountability Integration (or subordination) of research in national and regional  innovation systems From ensuring quality to promoting  excellence Continued (or even increased) steering to integrate institutional objectives with national  priorities Regional  convergence  (Europe: EHEA and ERA) Positioning national systems in  global  arena with  rankings  as benchmarking tools
Contexts Future trends and policies  to be expected: Continued increasing  participation ; growth will come from more diverse and more demanding students Changing  skill demands , including innovative skills and interdisciplinary skills for new professions More  challenging  situation at input side: resources, staff Increased social and political demand for  effectiveness , productivity in research and teaching, innovation More  competition , not only between institutions and countries, but also with new types of institutions outside the HE sector
Resistance to change? Challenge of tuning the different  rationales , system dynamics and motivations present in the higher education and research system Public policy rationale : efficiency, rationalisation and specialisation Institutional rationale : autonomy, expansion, coherence and competition Market rationale : rankings, reputation race and competition Research rationale : flexible networks organised around research needs and ideas
University Futures: Four Future Scenarios Open networking Serving local communities New public responsibility Higher education, Inc.
Scenario 1 Open Networking Main features International collaboration and networking leading to harmonization of systems English as lingua franca Free and open knowledge exchange and access to research International collaborative research,  even if within the persistent  hierarchy of institutions New approaches to teaching Related developments Bologna Process in Europe International academic partnerships and consortia Increased mobility Cheap and fast communication facilitated by the Internet Developing culture of openness
Open Networking – Some Implications Institutional Governance Focus on international co-operation and networking Institutional leaders providing overall vision and guidance Rather horizontal than vertical decision-making structures Networks within disciplines Inter-institutional information sharing for decision-making  Students Autonomous and cosmopolitan students (use of English) Study flexibility (online courses) Widespread student mobility Active international student networks
Scenario 2  Serving Local Communities Features Institutions mainly focused on national, regional and/or local missions Convergence between universities and polytechnics Academics are trusted professionals with teaching as their central objective Mainly publicly funded and administered systems Strengthened financial support from local industry and needs-based lifelong learning  Related developments Scepticism regarding globalisation, even anti-globalisation movements Emergence of geo-strategic concerns  Interest in preservation of national culture and fostering social cohesion Interest in regional role of higher education
Serving Local Communities – Some Implications Institutional Governance Focus on local responsiveness Integral industry and community participation in decision-making  Regular informal exchanges Coordination between local institutions Students Interlinked study and working life Preference for vocationally oriented degrees  Strengthened family and community ties Diversity of students and lifelong learning
Scenario 3 New Public Responsibility Features Autonomy of institutions combined with ‘new public management’ tools Significant share of public funding with increasingly mixed resource base  Strong public accountability but also more private reward systems Strong national competition for public research funding Related developments General quest for transparency, accountability, efficiency and effectiveness in public management Increasing institutional autonomy in many countries  Cost-sharing and raising tuition fees increasingly under debate Increasingly competitive research funding
New Public Responsibility – Some Implications Institutional Governance Institutional autonomy coupled with accountability Increasingly diversified accountability (Governments, students, industry)  Strong supervision bodies Increased vertical accountability of staff Students Students as “clients” Increased financial responsibilities Participation in institutional decision-making  Responsiveness on the needs of different kinds of students Rather cross-border mobility of institutions than of students
Scenario 4 Higher Education Inc. Features Global competition on a commercial basis Disconnection of research and teaching according to competitive advantage Strong competition for (English-speaking) students Concentration of research with worldwide competition for funding Public funding exclusively to non-commercially viable disciplines Related developments Trade in higher education and inclusion of  it in trade negotiations Increasing international mobility of students and cross-border higher education Increase of cross-border funding of research and private research activities
Higher Education Inc. – Some Implications Institutional Governance High institutional autonomy coupled with “market test” Direct accountability to different financial contributors Focus on securing funding and ensuring competitive advantage of the institution  Business like human resource practices Students Students as mobile “clients” of global higher education industry Strong financial participation Strong say in decision-making Choice over variety of programs and prices Influence of rankings on student choice
University Futures Scenarios Serving Local  Communities International National Market Demand-driven Administration Supply-driven Open Networking Higher Education Inc. New Public  Responsibility •
Need for new strategies Continued expansion of demand, participation and graduation: massification
Source: CERI/OECD,  2008
Expected supply of tertiary graduates
Need for new strategies Continued expansion of demand, participation and graduation: massification Changing skills demand and skills utilisation in learning organisations
Changing skill demand 4-Dec-2009 Dies Address Academic Ceremony 25th Anniversary OUNL Source: Levy and Murnane, 2005 Mean task input as percentiles of  the 1960 task distribution Economy-wide measures of routine and non-routine task input (US)
Distribution of employees across organisation classes (2005) Source: Holms, Lorenz, Lundvall and Valeyre
Learning organisations are associated with lead innovation (2000) Discretionary learning Lean organisation
Need for new strategies Continued expansion of demand, participation and graduation: massification Changing skills demand and skills utilisation in learning organisations Added-value of tertiary level qualifications and skills need to be maintained and even improved
 
Need for new strategies Continued expansion of demand, participation and graduation: massification Changing skills demand and skills utilisation in learning organisations Added-value of tertiary level qualifications and skills need to be maintained and even improved Growth and globalisation of scientific research asks for more flexible and interdisciplinary knowledge organisation
 
And technology…? IT has penetrated and transformed HE, but more so in research and management than education Today’s students are technology savvy, but do want technology to improve the teaching & learning process, not to radically change it Some expectations for revolutionary change in HE did not materialise But technology will be a crucial part of the process of change in higher education
Thank you ! [email_address] www.oecd.org/edu/ceri

Education for economic success new models for higher education ewf london january 2011

  • 1.
    Education for EconomicSuccess: New Strategies for Higher Education Dirk Van Damme Head of the Centre for Educational Research and Innovation at the OECD, Paris
  • 2.
    Outline Some startingpoints and questions Contexts of change: trends and policies Diverging rationales and resistance to change Four scenario’s for higher education’s future The need for new strategies And technology…?
  • 3.
    Starting points andquestions Despite high degree of technology adoption, massive impact of globalisation and continued massification, universities in general have not radically transformed their operation and delivery model. Increasing and diversifying demand and participation will continue to challenge prevailing models. Economic and fiscal crisis will lead to increased policy demands for excellence, efficiency and accountability. Will this create an environment of innovation and reform leading to new models of higher education?
  • 4.
    Contexts Main trends : Continued expansion of higher education systems in access and participation; demand will remain high More heterogeneous student population Institutional diversification More challenging and insecure funding Increased competition for resources and output, including for academics on a competitive market In an increasingly global context of networking, mobility and collaboration
  • 5.
    Contexts Main policy directions : Policy frameworks (theoretically) exchanging more institutional autonomy for accountability Integration (or subordination) of research in national and regional innovation systems From ensuring quality to promoting excellence Continued (or even increased) steering to integrate institutional objectives with national priorities Regional convergence (Europe: EHEA and ERA) Positioning national systems in global arena with rankings as benchmarking tools
  • 6.
    Contexts Future trendsand policies to be expected: Continued increasing participation ; growth will come from more diverse and more demanding students Changing skill demands , including innovative skills and interdisciplinary skills for new professions More challenging situation at input side: resources, staff Increased social and political demand for effectiveness , productivity in research and teaching, innovation More competition , not only between institutions and countries, but also with new types of institutions outside the HE sector
  • 7.
    Resistance to change?Challenge of tuning the different rationales , system dynamics and motivations present in the higher education and research system Public policy rationale : efficiency, rationalisation and specialisation Institutional rationale : autonomy, expansion, coherence and competition Market rationale : rankings, reputation race and competition Research rationale : flexible networks organised around research needs and ideas
  • 8.
    University Futures: FourFuture Scenarios Open networking Serving local communities New public responsibility Higher education, Inc.
  • 9.
    Scenario 1 OpenNetworking Main features International collaboration and networking leading to harmonization of systems English as lingua franca Free and open knowledge exchange and access to research International collaborative research, even if within the persistent hierarchy of institutions New approaches to teaching Related developments Bologna Process in Europe International academic partnerships and consortia Increased mobility Cheap and fast communication facilitated by the Internet Developing culture of openness
  • 10.
    Open Networking –Some Implications Institutional Governance Focus on international co-operation and networking Institutional leaders providing overall vision and guidance Rather horizontal than vertical decision-making structures Networks within disciplines Inter-institutional information sharing for decision-making Students Autonomous and cosmopolitan students (use of English) Study flexibility (online courses) Widespread student mobility Active international student networks
  • 11.
    Scenario 2 Serving Local Communities Features Institutions mainly focused on national, regional and/or local missions Convergence between universities and polytechnics Academics are trusted professionals with teaching as their central objective Mainly publicly funded and administered systems Strengthened financial support from local industry and needs-based lifelong learning Related developments Scepticism regarding globalisation, even anti-globalisation movements Emergence of geo-strategic concerns Interest in preservation of national culture and fostering social cohesion Interest in regional role of higher education
  • 12.
    Serving Local Communities– Some Implications Institutional Governance Focus on local responsiveness Integral industry and community participation in decision-making Regular informal exchanges Coordination between local institutions Students Interlinked study and working life Preference for vocationally oriented degrees Strengthened family and community ties Diversity of students and lifelong learning
  • 13.
    Scenario 3 NewPublic Responsibility Features Autonomy of institutions combined with ‘new public management’ tools Significant share of public funding with increasingly mixed resource base Strong public accountability but also more private reward systems Strong national competition for public research funding Related developments General quest for transparency, accountability, efficiency and effectiveness in public management Increasing institutional autonomy in many countries Cost-sharing and raising tuition fees increasingly under debate Increasingly competitive research funding
  • 14.
    New Public Responsibility– Some Implications Institutional Governance Institutional autonomy coupled with accountability Increasingly diversified accountability (Governments, students, industry) Strong supervision bodies Increased vertical accountability of staff Students Students as “clients” Increased financial responsibilities Participation in institutional decision-making Responsiveness on the needs of different kinds of students Rather cross-border mobility of institutions than of students
  • 15.
    Scenario 4 HigherEducation Inc. Features Global competition on a commercial basis Disconnection of research and teaching according to competitive advantage Strong competition for (English-speaking) students Concentration of research with worldwide competition for funding Public funding exclusively to non-commercially viable disciplines Related developments Trade in higher education and inclusion of it in trade negotiations Increasing international mobility of students and cross-border higher education Increase of cross-border funding of research and private research activities
  • 16.
    Higher Education Inc.– Some Implications Institutional Governance High institutional autonomy coupled with “market test” Direct accountability to different financial contributors Focus on securing funding and ensuring competitive advantage of the institution Business like human resource practices Students Students as mobile “clients” of global higher education industry Strong financial participation Strong say in decision-making Choice over variety of programs and prices Influence of rankings on student choice
  • 17.
    University Futures ScenariosServing Local Communities International National Market Demand-driven Administration Supply-driven Open Networking Higher Education Inc. New Public Responsibility •
  • 18.
    Need for newstrategies Continued expansion of demand, participation and graduation: massification
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Expected supply oftertiary graduates
  • 21.
    Need for newstrategies Continued expansion of demand, participation and graduation: massification Changing skills demand and skills utilisation in learning organisations
  • 22.
    Changing skill demand4-Dec-2009 Dies Address Academic Ceremony 25th Anniversary OUNL Source: Levy and Murnane, 2005 Mean task input as percentiles of the 1960 task distribution Economy-wide measures of routine and non-routine task input (US)
  • 23.
    Distribution of employeesacross organisation classes (2005) Source: Holms, Lorenz, Lundvall and Valeyre
  • 24.
    Learning organisations areassociated with lead innovation (2000) Discretionary learning Lean organisation
  • 25.
    Need for newstrategies Continued expansion of demand, participation and graduation: massification Changing skills demand and skills utilisation in learning organisations Added-value of tertiary level qualifications and skills need to be maintained and even improved
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Need for newstrategies Continued expansion of demand, participation and graduation: massification Changing skills demand and skills utilisation in learning organisations Added-value of tertiary level qualifications and skills need to be maintained and even improved Growth and globalisation of scientific research asks for more flexible and interdisciplinary knowledge organisation
  • 28.
  • 29.
    And technology…? IThas penetrated and transformed HE, but more so in research and management than education Today’s students are technology savvy, but do want technology to improve the teaching & learning process, not to radically change it Some expectations for revolutionary change in HE did not materialise But technology will be a crucial part of the process of change in higher education
  • 30.
    Thank you ![email_address] www.oecd.org/edu/ceri