Effectiveness and Capability of Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS): A Powerful Tool for Land use and Land Cover (LULC) Change and Accuracy Assessment

Volume 8, Issue 4, April – 2023 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
IJISRT23APR691 www.ijisrt.com 286
Effectiveness and Capability of Remote Sensing (RS)
and Geographic Information Systems (GIS):
A Powerful Tool for Land use and Land Cover
(LULC) Change and Accuracy Assessment
Land use and Land Cover (LULC) Change and Accuracy Evaluation using
Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
1
Nitin Liladhar Rane
2
Anand Achari
3
Saurabh P. Choudhary
4
Monica Giduturi
1,2,3,4
Vivekanand Education Society's College of Architecture (VESCOA), Mumbai, India
DOI:- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7845418
Abstract:- In this research paper, the effectiveness and
capability of remote sensing (RS) and geographic
information systems (GIS) are investigated as powerful
tools for analyzing changes in land use and land cover
(LULC), as well as for accuracy assessment. The study
employs the literature of satellite imagery and GIS data
to evaluate LULC changes over a period and to assess
the accuracy of the analysis. Moreover, the research
investigates the land use and land cover change detection
analysis using RS and GIS, application of
artificial intelligence (AI), and Machine Learning (ML)
in LULC classification, environment and risk evaluation,
stages of process LULC classification, factors affecting
the LULC classification, accuracy assessment, and
potential applications of RS and GIS in predicting future
LULC changes and supporting decision-making
processes. The findings of the study suggest that RS and
GIS are highly effective and accurate for LULC analysis
and assessment, with substantial potential for predicting
and managing future changes in land use and land cover.
The paper emphasizes the importance of utilizing RS
and GIS techniques in the field of sustainable
environmental management and resource planning.
Keywords:- Remote Sensing (RS); Geographic Information
Systems (GIS); Land use and Land Cover (LULC);
Accuracy Assessment; Scale; Resolution Effects.
I. INTRODUCTION
The understanding of land use and land cover (LULC)
changes is of utmost importance, and the integration of
Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information Systems
(GIS) has revolutionized the study of these changes [1-4].
Land use denotes how humans use land, while land cover
refers to the physical and biological features on the Earth's
surface. The use of RS involves sensors aboard platforms
such as satellites, drones, and aircraft to collect data from
various spectral bands. This data provides information on
the type of land cover on the surface and can help
understand changes in LULC. GIS, on the other hand, is a
computer-based system used to capture, store, manipulate,
analyze, and display geographically referenced data. It can
be used to create detailed maps of land cover types and
analyze patterns of land use.
The use of RS and GIS in LULC studies is crucial
because it allows for the creation of detailed and accurate
land cover maps that can be used to monitor changes over
time [4-7]. These maps provide information on the extent
and magnitude of LULC changes and help identify areas
that need protection or management interventions. For
example, it can help detect areas at risk of desertification or
forest fires, enabling interventions to mitigate these risks.
The integration of RS and GIS has also allowed for the
development of advanced modeling techniques, such as land
use change models and spatially explicit simulation models,
which can predict future LULC changes. This information
can help simulate different scenarios, such as the impact of
urbanization on natural areas or the effect of climate change
on agricultural production. The data generated can inform
decision-making and policy development, allowing for
proactive management interventions to be put in place.
RS and GIS also play an essential role in
understanding the impacts of LULC changes on the
environment [8-10]. For instance, it can monitor changes in
vegetation cover and detect changes in carbon storage, a
crucial factor in climate change mitigation. It can also
monitor changes in water resources, such as the impact of
deforestation on water quality and availability.

ISSN No:-2456-2165
The integration of RS and GIS is critical in
understanding the dynamics of LULC changes. It helps
create accurate land cover maps, advanced modeling
techniques, and monitor the impacts of LULC changes on
the environment [11-14]. The data generated can inform
decision-making and policy development, enabling effective
land management, conservation, and policymaking. RS and
GIS are powerful tools that can contribute to sustainable
development, making them essential in today's world.
This paper examines the efficacy and potential of
remote sensing (RS) and geographic information systems
(GIS) as potent instruments for analyzing land use and land
cover (LULC) changes and assessing accuracy. Remote
sensing involves collecting information about the Earth's
surface through sensors aboard various platforms, such as
satellites, aircraft, or drones. GIS is a computer-based
system that captures, stores, manipulates, analyzes, and
presents geographically referenced data. Together, these
tools have revolutionized the way we investigate and
understand the Earth's surface and its changes over time.
Land use and land cover change is a significant
challenge faced by many regions worldwide. Multiple
factors drive it, including population growth, urbanization,
deforestation, and agricultural expansion. It is crucial to
comprehend the magnitude and drivers of these changes to
enable effective land management, conservation, and
policymaking.
Remote sensing and GIS offer a powerful approach for
quantifying LULC changes over time. Researchers can
evaluate changes in vegetation cover, urbanization,
deforestation, and other LULC changes by comparing
images of the same area taken at different times.
Furthermore, these tools can provide spatially explicit data
on the location and extent of these changes, facilitating more
targeted and effective management interventions.
The accuracy and reliability of data provided by
remote sensing and GIS are critical. Accuracy assessment
involves evaluating the correctness and dependability of
remote sensing and GIS data by comparing it with ground
truth data. Ground truth data are obtained through field
surveys or other dependable sources and provide a reference
point for assessing the accuracy of remote sensing and GIS
data.
This paper investigates the effectiveness and capability
of remote sensing and GIS for LULC change and accuracy
assessment. It aims to present a comprehensive review of
the latest methods and techniques used for image
processing, classification, and accuracy assessment in these
areas. The strengths and limitations of remote sensing and
GIS for LULC change analysis and accuracy assessment are
discussed, and areas requiring further research are identified.
This paper underscores the importance of remote
sensing and GIS as powerful tools for examining land use
and land cover changes and assessing accuracy. The data
generated by these tools can inform effective land
management, conservation, and policymaking, making them
indispensable for sustainable development.
II. LAND USE AND LAND COVER CHANGE
DETECTION ANALYSIS USING RS AND GIS
Land use and land cover change (LULCC) is the
process of altering natural and semi-natural landscapes
through human activities such as urbanization, agriculture,
mining, and forestry. LULCC analysis has become a crucial
tool for environmental management and planning, as it
provides valuable information about the effects of land use
changes on ecological systems, biodiversity, and socio-
economic development. Remote sensing (RS) and
geographic information systems (GIS) are powerful
technologies that allow for the detection, characterization,
and quantification of LULCC using digital images and
spatial data.
Detecting LULCC involves comparing land use and
land cover maps derived from different time periods using
RS data obtained from satellite, airborne, or ground-based
sensors that capture information on the spectral, temporal,
and spatial characteristics of the Earth's surface. Spectral
information reflects the reflectance or emission of energy by
different land cover types in various wavelength bands,
while temporal information reflects seasonal and annual
changes in land use patterns. Spatial information reflects the
location and extent of land use and land cover features,
which are represented as pixels in digital images.
GIS is used to manage and analyze spatial data,
including RS data, to generate maps and other geospatial
products. GIS integrates multiple data layers, such as
topography, climate, soil, and land use, and creates complex
models and simulations that assess the impacts of LULCC
on various environmental and socio-economic variables.
GIS identifies hotspots of LULCC, such as areas with high
rates of deforestation or urbanization and prioritizes
conservation and development interventions based on the
ecological and social values of affected areas [15-17].
LULCC analysis using RS and GIS involves data
acquisition, preprocessing, classification, accuracy
assessment, and change detection [18,19]. Data acquisition
involves selecting and obtaining RS and other spatial data
relevant to the study area and research question.
Preprocessing involves correcting, enhancing, and
registering RS data for quality and compatibility with GIS
analysis. Classification involves assigning land use and land
cover classes to RS data pixels based on their spectral and
contextual properties. Classification algorithms can be
supervised or unsupervised and use various techniques, such
as maximum likelihood, decision trees, and neural networks.
Accuracy assessment involves validating classification
results using ground truth data collected in the field or from
other sources, such as high-resolution imagery or historical
maps. Change detection involves comparing land use and
land cover maps derived from different time periods using
post-classification comparison, image differencing, and

ISSN No:-2456-2165
object-based analysis. Change detection identifies areas
where LULCC has occurred, quantifies the magnitude and
direction of LULCC, and evaluates the causes and impacts
of LULCC [3,20].
LULCC analysis using RS and GIS has several
applications, including natural resource management, urban
planning, and disaster management. In natural resource
management, LULCC analysis monitors forest cover
changes, wetland degradation, and desertification,
prioritizing conservation and restoration actions. In urban
planning, LULCC analysis assesses the effects of
urbanization on land use and land cover patterns and
identifies areas for green infrastructure and sustainable
development. In disaster management, LULCC analysis
assesses the vulnerability of different areas to natural
hazards such as floods, landslides, and wildfires.
III. TECHNIQUES AND APPROACHES FOR
LULC CLASSIFICATION
The identification and categorization of different types
of land use and land cover within a specific region or area is
known as Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) classification.
This information is essential for various applications,
including environmental monitoring, land use planning,
natural resource management, and disaster management.
With the advancement of remote sensing technology and
image processing techniques, various techniques and
approaches for LULC classification have been developed
[21-23].
Supervised classification is one of the most commonly
used techniques for LULC classification. It involves using a
labeled training dataset representing different land cover
classes to train a classification algorithm to identify patterns
and spectral signatures of each class. The algorithm is then
applied to the entire image to classify each pixel into one of
the predefined land cover classes. The accuracy of this
classification depends on the quality of the training dataset,
the choice of classification algorithm, and the quality of the
image data.
Another approach for LULC classification is
unsupervised classification, which clusters pixels based on
their spectral characteristics. The algorithm groups pixels
with similar spectral properties into different classes,
making it suitable for exploratory analysis. However, the
accuracy of unsupervised classification is usually lower than
supervised classification.
Machine learning algorithms, such as random forests,
support vector machines, and neural networks, have been
increasingly applied to LULC classification, particularly for
dealing with large datasets, complex landscapes, and multi-
spectral images.
LiDAR, synthetic aperture radar (SAR), and
unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery are other data
sources used for LULC classification. LiDAR data provides
high-resolution information about the vertical structure of
vegetation, SAR data can penetrate through clouds and
vegetation, and UAV imagery provides high-resolution
information about small-scale land cover patterns.
The selection of the appropriate technique and
approach for LULC classification depends on several
factors, including the study's objectives, data availability and
quality, and spatial and temporal resolution requirements.
This paper will review and compare the different techniques
and approaches for LULC classification, highlighting their
strengths and weaknesses and providing insights into their
applications in various fields.
A. Manual Classification
The manual classification of land use land cover is the
act of visually interpreting and analyzing satellite imagery,
aerial photographs, or other remote sensing data to identify
and map various land cover and land use categories. This
process requires expert knowledge, field observations, and
predefined classification rules to classify the land into
categories such as forests, grasslands, croplands, urban
areas, water bodies, and barren lands.
To start the manual classification process, appropriate
satellite imagery or aerial photographs covering the study
area are selected and acquired. The imagery must have high
spatial and spectral resolution to capture the necessary level
of detail for each land use land cover category. After
acquiring the imagery, it is pre-processed to remove noise,
atmospheric effects, or other artifacts that may affect the
classification's accuracy.
Image interpretation is the next step, where the
interpreter visually examines the imagery and identifies
different land use land cover categories. This process
requires expert knowledge and the ability to differentiate
between different land cover types based on their spectral,
spatial, and temporal characteristics. The interpreter
examines the imagery at various scales, from the broad scale
of the entire study area to the fine scale of individual land
cover features.
Once the different land cover types are identified, the
interpreter assigns each feature to a specific land use land
cover category using a set of predefined classification rules.
These rules may be based on spectral characteristics or
spatial characteristics, such as the shape, size, and texture of
different land cover features.
Accuracy assessment is the final step in manual
classification, which involves comparing the classified map
with ground truth data collected in the field or from other
sources. This step is essential to ensure the classification's
accuracy and to identify any errors or inconsistencies in the
classification process. Accuracy assessment may involve
statistical measures such as error matrices, kappa
coefficients, or overall accuracy assessments.
Manual classification has several advantages over
automated classification techniques, including the ability to
incorporate expert knowledge and the flexibility to adapt to

ISSN No:-2456-2165
different study areas and data types. It can also produce
high-quality maps with a high level of detail. However,
manual classification also has some limitations, including
the potential for subjective interpretation, the time and
labor-intensive nature of the process, and difficulty in
scaling up to larger study areas.
Manual classification of land use land cover is a
valuable technique for mapping and monitoring land cover
changes over time. Expert knowledge, field observations,
and predefined classification rules are used to identify and
map different land use land cover categories. While manual
classification has some limitations, it remains an important
tool for generating accurate and detailed land use land cover
maps.
B. Numerical and Digital Classification
Land use and land cover classification is the process of
categorizing the physical and biological characteristics of
the earth's surface into distinct classes. This classification is
vital for a range of applications, including resource
management, land-use planning, and environmental
assessment. There are two main methods of land-use and
land-cover classification: numerical and digital
classification.
Numerical classification, also known as manual
classification, involves the identification of land-use and
land-cover classes by experts who analyze aerial
photographs, satellite imagery, or ground observations. This
method is time-consuming, requires skilled personnel, and is
subject to human errors. On the other hand, digital
classification involves the use of remote sensing data and
computer algorithms to automate the classification process.
This method is more efficient and accurate than numerical
classification because it reduces the time required to identify
land-use and land-cover classes and eliminates the human
errors associated with visual interpretation.
The digital classification process involves converting
remote sensing data into digital numbers that can be
analyzed using mathematical algorithms. The algorithms are
designed to identify the spectral characteristics of each pixel
in the image and assign it to a particular land-use or land-
cover class based on pre-defined spectral signatures. The
spectral signature of each land-use and land-cover class is
unique and is used as a reference for the classification
process.
The digital classification method can be further
classified into supervised and unsupervised classification. In
supervised classification, the analyst provides the computer
with a set of training data that contains the spectral
signatures of each land-use and land-cover class. The
computer uses this information to classify the remaining
pixels in the image. In unsupervised classification, the
computer automatically identifies the spectral classes
present in the image and groups them based on their
similarities. The analyst then assigns a land-use and land-
cover class to each spectral class based on their
characteristics.
The accuracy of land-use and land-cover classification
depends on several factors, including the quality of the
remote sensing data used, the spectral signature libraries
available, and the accuracy of the algorithms used. The
quality of remote sensing data can be affected by
atmospheric conditions, sun angle, and sensor calibration.
The accuracy of the spectral signature libraries depends on
the number and diversity of the samples collected from each
land-use and land-cover class. The accuracy of the
algorithms used depends on the mathematical models used
to classify the data.
Land-use and land-cover classification are crucial for
various applications, and there are two main methods of
classification: numerical and digital classification. While
numerical classification involves visual interpretation and is
subject to human errors, digital classification involves
remote sensing data and computer algorithms and is more
efficient and accurate. The accuracy of the classification
depends on the quality of the remote sensing data used, the
spectral signature libraries available, and the accuracy of the
algorithms used.
C. Hybrid Techniques
Hybrid techniques for land use and land cover mapping
involve combining both remote sensing data and ground-
based data to obtain more precise and reliable information.
Remote sensing data refers to the use of sensors on satellites,
airplanes, or unmanned aerial vehicles to collect data on the
Earth's surface. Ground-based data, on the other hand,
includes data gathered through field surveys, interviews, and
observations. The integration of these two sources of data
can help create accurate and reliable land use and land cover
maps.
One of the advantages of using hybrid techniques is
that it can enhance the accuracy of land use and land cover
mapping. Remote sensing data alone may not provide
enough information to distinguish between different land
cover types. For instance, it may be challenging to
differentiate between grasslands and croplands using satellite
imagery. However, ground-based data such as information
on crop rotations or field boundaries can provide additional
information to help distinguish between different land cover
types.
Hybrid techniques can also improve the spatial and
temporal resolution of land use and land cover mapping.
Remote sensing data has the advantage of covering vast
areas, but it may not have a high enough spatial resolution to
identify small-scale features such as individual trees or
buildings. Ground-based data can provide more detailed
information on these features and can also be used to verify
the accuracy of remote sensing data.
Moreover, hybrid techniques can monitor changes in
land use and land cover over time. Remote sensing data can
provide information on land cover changes over large areas,
but it may not be able to distinguish between different types
of land use changes. Ground-based data can provide more
detailed information on these types of changes, which can

ISSN No:-2456-2165
help improve the accuracy of land use and land cover maps
over time.
Several techniques can be used to combine remote
sensing and ground-based data for land use and land cover
mapping. One of these is object-based image analysis
(OBIA), which involves segmenting satellite imagery into
individual objects based on spectral, spatial, and contextual
information. Ground-based data such as field surveys or
interviews can then be used to classify these objects into
different land use and land cover types.
Another technique is participatory mapping, which
involves collaborating with local communities to collect
ground-based data on land use and land cover. This can
include information on land tenure, crop types, and land
management practices. This information can be used to
validate remote sensing data and improve the accuracy of
land use and land cover maps.
Hybrid techniques for land use and land cover mapping
can provide more accurate and reliable information than
remote sensing or ground-based data alone. By combining
these two sources of data, it is possible to enhance the spatial
and temporal resolution of land use and land cover maps,
monitor changes over time, and verify the accuracy of remote
sensing data. These techniques are becoming increasingly
crucial in land use and land cover mapping and are likely to
become even more important in the future as the demand for
accurate and reliable information on land use and land cover
continues to grow.
IV. APPLICATION ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE (AI) AND MACHINE
LEARNING (ML) IN LULC
CLASSIFICATION
Land use and land cover (LULC) classification is
crucial in various environmental applications, including land-
use planning, natural resource management, and ecological
conservation. With the help of advanced technology and the
availability of large datasets, artificial intelligence (AI) and
machine learning (ML) algorithms have become widely used
in LULC classification. In this essay, we will discuss the
application of AI and ML in LULC classification, as well as
the benefits and challenges associated with these approaches
[24-26].
AI and ML are related fields, with AI referring to
machines' ability to perform tasks that typically require
human intelligence, such as perception, reasoning, learning,
and decision-making. ML, on the other hand, focuses on the
development of algorithms that enable machines to learn
from data and make predictions or decisions without explicit
programming. In LULC classification, ML algorithms can
automatically identify and classify different land use and
land cover types based on their spectral characteristics.
Supervised classification is one of the most widely used
ML algorithms in LULC classification. This approach
involves collecting and labeling a set of training samples
with their corresponding land use and land cover types. The
algorithm then learns the spectral characteristics of different
land use and land cover types using these samples and
assigns pixels in the image to the appropriate class based on
their similarity to the training samples. Supervised
classification algorithms include maximum likelihood,
support vector machine, and random forest.
Unsupervised classification is another commonly used
ML algorithm in LULC classification. This approach
involves the algorithm identifying clusters of pixels in the
image that have similar spectral characteristics and assigning
them to different land use and land cover types. This
approach does not require labeled training samples, but it
relies on the assumption that pixels with similar spectral
characteristics belong to the same land use or land cover
type. Unsupervised classification algorithms include k-means
clustering and hierarchical clustering.
The use of AI and ML algorithms in LULC
classification offers several advantages. These algorithms
can handle large datasets and process images quickly, which
is crucial in applications that require up-to-date information,
such as disaster management and urban planning.
Additionally, they can reduce human error associated with
manual classification by providing accurate and consistent
results. Finally, they can detect subtle differences in spectral
characteristics that may be difficult for human observers to
distinguish, improving the accuracy of classification results.
Despite the advantages of AI and ML in LULC
classification, there are several challenges associated with
these approaches. The availability and quality of training
data is one of the primary challenges. The accuracy of
classification results in supervised classification depends on
the quality and representativeness of the training samples. In
unsupervised classification, the accuracy of classification
results depends on the number of clusters and the criteria
used to determine the optimal number of clusters. Therefore,
it is essential to collect sufficient and representative training
data to ensure accurate classification results.
The complexity of ML algorithms is another challenge
that can make it difficult to interpret classification results.
While AI and ML algorithms can provide accurate
classification results, they often lack transparency, making it
difficult to understand how they arrive at their decisions.
This can be a significant challenge in applications that
require a high level of transparency, such as legal or
regulatory decisions.
AI and ML algorithms have become essential tools in
LULC classification. They can handle large datasets, reduce
human error, and detect subtle differences in spectral
characteristics, improving the accuracy of classification
results. However, the accuracy of classification results
depends on the quality and representativeness of the training
data, and the complexity of ML algorithms can make it
difficult to interpret classification results. Therefore, it is
crucial to collect sufficient and representative training data

ISSN No:-2456-2165
and carefully evaluate the accuracy and transparency of
classification results.
V. ENVIRONMENT AND RISK EVALUATION
Land use and land cover have significant influence on
the environment and the level of risks associated with
human activities. Thus, evaluating the environment and risks
related to land use and land cover is crucial in identifying
potential threats to environmental sustainability and human
wellbeing. This assessment is essential to comprehend how
land use changes impact ecosystem services, biodiversity,
and human health and welfare.
Assessing land use and land cover involves examining
the physical, chemical, and biological aspects of the
environment, including air, water, soil, and vegetation
quality. It also involves analyzing human activities that may
affect these components, such as agriculture, urbanization,
and mining. Through an understanding of the current state
of these components and their relationship with human
activities, potential risks to the environment and human
populations can be identified [27,28].
The loss of biodiversity is one of the key
environmental risks associated with land use and land cover.
Activities like deforestation and urbanization can lead to
habitat destruction, fragmentation, and loss of biodiversity.
This loss of biodiversity can have significant ecological and
economic impacts, such as the loss of essential ecosystem
services like pollination, pest control, and nutrient cycling.
Therefore, assessing land use and land cover should take
into account the potential impact of human activities on
biodiversity and develop measures to mitigate it.
Another environmental risk associated with land use
and land cover is the degradation of soil quality. Activities
like intensive agriculture and mining can cause soil erosion,
compaction, and depletion of soil nutrients. This can have
significant impacts on agricultural productivity, water
quality, and biodiversity. Thus, assessing land use and land
cover should consider the potential impact of human
activities on soil quality and develop measures to mitigate it.
Human activities related to land use and land cover
can also pose risks to human health and welfare. For
instance, exposure to air pollution from industrial activities
or transportation can result in respiratory and cardiovascular
diseases. Similarly, exposure to contaminated water or soil
can cause severe health risks like infectious diseases, cancer,
and neurological disorders. Thus, assessing land use and
land cover should also consider the potential impact of
human activities on human health and welfare and develop
measures to mitigate it.
Evaluating land use and land cover is crucial in
understanding the potential environmental and human risks
related to human activities. Through identifying potential
risks and developing measures to mitigate them,
environmental sustainability can be promoted, and the
wellbeing of human populations can be protected. To ensure
sustainable land management practices, environmental and
risk evaluation is a crucial aspect of land management. This
process involves using remote sensing (RS) and geographic
information system (GIS) to analyze land use and land cover
changes and assess their impacts on the environment. RS
and GIS are the primary tools for assessing the environment
and the risks associated with land use activities [1-3,22-25].
Remote sensing utilizes satellites or aircraft to capture
images of the earth's surface, providing a comprehensive
view of the land and detecting land use and land cover
changes. GIS is a computer-based tool that integrates and
analyzes spatial data. Together, RS and GIS are powerful
tools for analyzing land use and land cover changes and
assessing their impacts on the environment.
One of the main applications of RS and GIS in
environmental and risk evaluation is the mapping of land
use and land cover changes. This process provides valuable
information on the distribution and extent of different land
uses and land covers, such as urban areas, forests, wetlands,
and agricultural land. This information is used to identify
areas that have undergone changes in land use and land
cover and monitor the impacts of these changes on the
environment.
Another application of RS and GIS is analyzing the
impacts of land use and land cover changes on the
environment. These changes can affect the environment in
various ways, such as changes in the hydrological cycle, soil
erosion, and loss of biodiversity. RS and GIS can analyze
these impacts and identify areas that are at risk of
environmental degradation.
RS and GIS are also used to identify areas at risk of
natural disasters, such as floods and landslides. Factors such
as slope, soil type, and rainfall are analyzed to identify areas
susceptible to these hazards. This information is then used to
develop strategies for mitigating the risks associated with
these natural disasters.
RS and GIS are valuable tools for environmental and
risk evaluation using land use and land cover analysis. They
provide detailed information on land use and land cover
changes and their impacts on the environment, enabling
effective land management and protection of the
environment. The use of RS and GIS in environmental and
risk evaluation is essential for sustainable land management
practices.
VI. STAGES OF PROCESS LULC
CLASSIFICATION
Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) classification is a
process that involves categorizing the Earth's surface into
various land use and land cover classes based on the
interpretation of remotely sensed images. It is essential in
understanding natural resource dynamics and environmental
changes over time. The LULC classification process
consists of several stages that are crucial in achieving the
accuracy and precision of the final output.

ISSN No:-2456-2165
 Data Acquisition
The first stage in the LULC classification process is
data acquisition. The data used in this process are typically
obtained from remote sensing platforms like satellites, aerial
photography, or LiDAR data. The data must be of high
quality and resolution to ensure the accuracy of the
classification. The spatial resolution should be suitable for
the study area and the desired level of detail. Additionally,
the data should cover the study area comprehensively and be
free from any distortions or errors that could affect the
classification accuracy.
 Image Preprocessing
After data acquisition, the next stage is image
preprocessing. The acquired data needs to undergo several
steps such as radiometric and geometric corrections, image
enhancement, and filtering before it can be used for
classification. Radiometric correction is used to remove
atmospheric effects on the image, while geometric
correction is used to align the image to the correct position
on the Earth's surface. Image enhancement and filtering are
used to improve the image quality and reduce noise.
 Image Segmentation
The third stage is image segmentation. It involves
dividing the image into smaller segments based on the
characteristics of the image, such as texture, color, and
shape. The goal of segmentation is to identify the
homogenous regions within the image that can be classified
into a single LULC class. Segmentation can be done using
various algorithms like region-growing, watershed, and
graph-based algorithms.
 Feature Extraction
The feature extraction stage follows the image
segmentation stage. This stage involves extracting features
from the segmented image that can be used to classify the
different land cover and land use classes. The features can
be spectral, spatial, or contextual. Spectral features include
the reflectance values of the different bands in the image,
while spatial features include the size, shape, and texture of
the segmented regions. Contextual features consider the
relationships between adjacent regions in the image.
 Classification
After feature extraction, the next stage is classification.
This stage involves assigning each segmented region in the
image to a specific LULC class based on the extracted
features. Classification can be supervised or unsupervised.
In supervised classification, training samples are selected
from the image, and a classification algorithm is trained to
recognize the different LULC classes based on these
samples. In unsupervised classification, the algorithm
clusters the image segments into different LULC classes
based on the similarity of their features.
 Accuracy Assessment
Accuracy assessment is the next stage in the LULC
classification process. This stage involves determining the
accuracy of the LULC classification results. This is done by
comparing the classified image with ground truth data
obtained through field surveys or other reliable sources. The
accuracy of the classification can be quantified using
various measures, such as overall accuracy, producer's
accuracy, and user's accuracy.
 Post-Classification Processing
The final stage is post-classification processing. This
stage involves refining the classification results by removing
misclassified pixels or merging adjacent regions with similar
characteristics. This stage is crucial in improving the
accuracy of the classification results and producing a final
LULC map that accurately represents the Earth's surface.
The LULC classification process is a crucial step in
understanding natural resource dynamics and environmental
changes over time. Each stage of the process is essential in
achieving an accurate and precise classification result. By
following these stages, we can gain a better understanding
of the Earth's surface and make informed decisions in
sustainable development planning.
VII. FACTORS AFFECTING THE LULC
CLASSIFICATION
The following are the various factors that can impact
the accuracy and reliability of land use and land cover
(LULC) classification. To ensure precise and dependable
LULC classification, the following factors should be
considered and mitigated:
 Spatial and Temporal Resolution of Satellite Images:
The spatial and temporal resolution of satellite images
plays a significant role in LULC classification accuracy.
Low spatial resolution images can lead to mixed pixels and
misclassification of land cover types. Similarly, low
temporal resolution can affect tracking seasonal or annual
changes in land use. To mitigate this, higher resolution
images should be acquired, and multi-temporal imagery
should be utilized.
The accuracy of LULC classification is heavily
influenced by spatial resolution, as it determines the level of
detail that can be captured in an image. Higher spatial
resolution can capture more detail, allowing for better
differentiation between land cover types. For example, an
image with a spatial resolution of 1 meter can differentiate
between tree species, whereas an image with a resolution of
30 meters cannot. Additionally, higher spatial resolution
images can reduce mixed pixels, where a single pixel
contains multiple land cover types, making classification
challenging.
Temporal resolution is also important for LULC
classification because it captures changes in land use/land
cover over time. For instance, comparing a summer image
of a forested area with a winter image can reveal changes
such as land clearance for agriculture. Higher temporal
resolution images can capture seasonal changes in land
use/land cover, such as crop changes or water body
fluctuations due to seasonal rainfall. The classification

ISSN No:-2456-2165
accuracy can be improved by detecting and recording these
changes.
However, there is a trade-off between spatial and
temporal resolution. High spatial resolution images often
have low temporal resolution, as it takes longer to collect
and process data from high-resolution sensors. Conversely,
high temporal resolution images may have lower spatial
resolution, as sensors with higher temporal resolution cover
larger areas at a lower level of detail.
The choice of satellite image should be based on
specific LULC classification objectives, as well as the
availability and cost of different types of satellite data. A
higher spatial resolution image might be more appropriate if
the goal is to accurately classify different types of land
cover. In contrast, a higher temporal resolution image might
be more appropriate for tracking changes in land use/land
cover over time.
 Image Pre-Processing:
Radiometric calibration, atmospheric correction, and
geometric correction are crucial pre-processing steps that
can affect the accuracy of LULC classification. Any errors
in these steps can lead to incorrect classification results.
Therefore, it is essential to ensure that these steps are
accurately performed.
 Spectral Bands used:
The choice of spectral bands used for LULC
classification significantly impacts classification accuracy.
Selecting appropriate spectral bands that can differentiate
between different land cover types is vital for precise
classification.
 Training Data Selection:
The accuracy of LULC classification depends on the
quality and quantity of the training data used. Representative
training data covering all the land cover types present is
crucial for accurate classification. Land use classification
involves categorizing different land cover types based on
their usage, and it plays a critical role in urban planning,
natural resource management, and environmental
monitoring. To achieve accurate land use classification, the
quality of the training data used to train the models is vital.
The selection of training data can affect land use
classification in various ways. For instance, biased training
data can negatively impact the accuracy of the classification
model by favoring one or more land use types. Inadequate
training data that fails to represent the variety of land cover
types present in the study area may compromise the model's
accuracy. The quality of training data is also essential, as
errors or poor labeling can lead to inaccurate results.
Consistency over time is crucial when training the model,
and the spatial distribution of the training data should be
evenly distributed to represent the area's land use types
accurately. It is crucial to have training data that is
representative, sufficient, high quality, consistent over time,
and spatially distributed to achieve reliable land use
classification results.
By considering and mitigating these factors, the
accuracy and reliability of LULC classification can be
significantly improved.
VIII. ACCURACY ASSESSMENT
To ensure the reliability of a land use land cover
(LULC) classification map, it is crucial to assess its
accuracy [22-25]. This process involves comparing the
classification map to a reference dataset containing the
actual land use land cover types in the study area. The
reference dataset can be obtained through fieldwork or high-
resolution satellite imagery. The accuracy of the
classification map is usually expressed as an overall
accuracy, user's accuracy, and producer's accuracy for each
land use land cover class.
The overall accuracy is calculated as the percentage of
correctly classified pixels in the map, while the user's and
producer's accuracy are calculated as the percentage of
correctly classified pixels for a specific land use land cover
class and the percentage of pixels correctly classified as a
specific land use land cover class, respectively. To perform
accuracy assessment, a sample of pixels is randomly
selected from the classification map and compared to the
reference dataset using statistical methods such as confusion
matrix analysis, kappa coefficient, and overall accuracy.
The accuracy of the LULC classification is affected by
various factors such as the quality of the remotely sensed
data, accuracy of the reference dataset, and classification
algorithm used. It is important to select an appropriate
classification algorithm that suits the study area and the
level of detail required. Accuracy assessment should also be
performed regularly to ensure that the classification map
remains reliable, especially if there are changes in land use
land cover types in the study area.
In the field of remote sensing, assessing the accuracy
of land use classification is essential to evaluate the
performance of classification algorithms and estimate the
reliability of the resulting land use map. A widely used tool
in accuracy assessment is the confusion matrix, which
summarizes the classification results in a tabular format.
This matrix compares the actual land use classes on the
ground (reference data) to the classified land use classes
obtained from remote sensing data, with four cells
representing true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true
negative (TN), and false negative (FN) classifications.
TP represents the number of pixels correctly classified
into the class of interest, while FP represents the number of
pixels incorrectly classified into the class of interest. TN
represents the number of pixels correctly classified into
classes other than the class of interest, and FN represents the
number of pixels incorrectly classified as classes other than
the class of interest.
Various statistical metrics can be calculated from the
confusion matrix to evaluate the accuracy of land use
classification. Overall accuracy, user's accuracy, producer's

ISSN No:-2456-2165
accuracy, and Kappa coefficient are some of the commonly
used metrics.
Overall accuracy represents the percentage of correctly
classified pixels out of the total number of pixels in the
reference data. User's accuracy represents the percentage of
correctly classified pixels in a particular class out of the total
number of pixels classified as that class. Producer's accuracy
represents the percentage of correctly classified pixels in a
particular class out of the total number of pixels in the
reference data that belong to that class.
Kappa coefficient is a statistical measure of agreement
between the classification results and the reference data,
accounting for the agreement that would occur by chance.
Kappa coefficient ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 represents no
agreement, and 1 represents perfect agreement.
Confusion matrix analysis is a fundamental tool in
accuracy assessment of land use classification, allowing for
the evaluation of classification algorithm performance,
identification of strengths and weaknesses in classification,
and estimation of map reliability. The statistical metrics
obtained from the confusion matrix provide quantitative
measures of accuracy that are essential in various
applications, including environmental monitoring, land
management, and urban planning.
Accuracy assessment is a crucial step in the LULC
classification process, as it ensures the reliability of the
resulting map [24-27]. By comparing the classification map
to a reference dataset and calculating various measures of
accuracy, it is possible to evaluate the quality of the
classification and make informed decisions based on the
resulting map.
IX. CONCLUSIONS
To conclude, Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic
Information Systems (GIS) are effective tools for detecting
and assessing accuracy of Land Use and Land Cover (LULC)
changes. This paper has reviewed various studies
demonstrating the capabilities of RS and GIS in monitoring
LULC changes, assessing their accuracy, and analyzing the
drivers behind them. These studies have proven that RS and
GIS provide precise and timely information on LULC
changes.
RS and GIS have advantages in LULC monitoring,
such as obtaining spatially explicit information over large
areas. With high-resolution imagery, RS can identify and
map LULC changes at various scales while GIS can integrate
RS data with other sources like socioeconomic data to
analyze LULC change drivers. Additionally, RS and GIS
provide a reliable and cost-effective way to assess the
accuracy of LULC classifications, improving the quality of
LULC maps.
Nevertheless, there are some challenges in LULC
monitoring using RS and GIS. Obtaining accurate ground
truth data for validation purposes, especially in remote areas,
is one of the main challenges. Additionally, skilled personnel
are needed to analyze and interpret RS and GIS data, which
can be expensive and time-consuming.
In conclusion, RS and GIS are valuable tools for LULC
monitoring and accuracy assessment, despite some
challenges. These tools can provide precise information on
LULC changes, which can help inform policy decisions and
land use planning. Therefore, it is recommended that further
research is conducted to explore the potential of RS and GIS
in LULC monitoring and accuracy assessment.
REFERENCES
[1] Attri, P., Chaudhry, S., & Sharma, S. (2015). Remote
sensing & GIS based approaches for LULC change
detection—A review. International Journal of Current
Engineering and Technology, 5(5), 3126-3137.
[2] Alshari, E. A., & Gawali, B. W. (2021). Development
of classification system for LULC using remote
sensing and GIS. Global transitions proceedings,
2(1), 8-17.
[3] Gidado, K. A., Kamarudin, M. K. A., Firdaus, N. A.,
Nalado, A. M., Saudi, A. S. M., Saad, M. H. M., &
Ibrahim, S. (2018). Analysis of spatiotemporal land
use and land cover changes using remote sensing and
GIS: a review. International Journal of Engineering &
Technology, 7(4.34), 159-162.
[4] Liu, P., Jia, S., Han, R., Liu, Y., Lu, X., & Zhang, H.
(2020). RS and GIS supported urban LULC and UHI
change simulation and assessment. Journal of
Sensors, 2020, 1-17.
[5] Ahmed, R., Ahmad, S. T., Wani, G. F., Ahmed, P.,
Mir, A. A., & Singh, A. (2022). Analysis of landuse
and landcover changes in Kashmir valley, India—a
review. GeoJournal, 87(5), 4391-4403.
[6] Yasir, M., Hui, S., Binghu, H., & Rahman, S. U.
(2020). Coastline extraction and land use change
analysis using remote sensing (RS) and geographic
information system (GIS) technology–A review of
the literature. Reviews on environmental health,
35(4), 453-460.
[7] Nath, B., Niu, Z., & Singh, R. P. (2018). Land Use
and Land Cover changes, and environment and risk
evaluation of Dujiangyan city (SW China) using
remote sensing and GIS techniques. Sustainability,
10(12), 4631.
[8] Twisa, S., & Buchroithner, M. F. (2019). Land-use
and land-cover (LULC) change detection in Wami
River Basin, Tanzania. Land, 8(9), 136.
[9] Rane, N. L., & Jayaraj, G. K. (2022). Comparison of
multi-influence factor, weight of evidence and
frequency ratio techniques to evaluate groundwater
potential zones of basaltic aquifer systems.
Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(2),
2315-2344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-
01535-5
[10] Rane, N. L., & Attarde, P. M. (2016). Application of
value engineering in commercial building projects.
International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering
and Technology, 6(3), 286-291.

ISSN No:-2456-2165
[11] Rane, N., & Jayaraj, G. K. (2021). Stratigraphic
modeling and hydraulic characterization of a typical
basaltic aquifer system in the Kadva river basin,
Nashik, India. Modeling Earth Systems and
Environment, 7, 293-306.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-01008-0
[12] Rane, N., & Jayaraj, G. K. (2021). Evaluation of
multiwell pumping aquifer tests in unconfined aquifer
system by Neuman (1975) method with numerical
modeling. In Groundwater resources development
and planning in the semi-arid region (pp. 93-106).
Cham: Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68124-1_5
[13] Kaliraj, S., Chandrasekar, N., Ramachandran, K. K.,
Srinivas, Y., & Saravanan, S. (2017). Coastal landuse
and land cover change and transformations of
Kanyakumari coast, India using remote sensing and
GIS. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and
Space Science, 20(2), 169-185.
[14] Olokeogun, O. S., Iyiola, K., & Iyiola, O. F. (2014).
Application of remote sensing and GIS in land
use/land cover mapping and change detection in
Shasha forest reserve, Nigeria. The International
Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing
and Spatial Information Sciences, 40(8), 613-616.
[15] Chughtai, A. H., Abbasi, H., & Karas, I. R. (2021). A
review on change detection method and accuracy
assessment for land use land cover. Remote Sensing
Applications: Society and Environment, 22, 100482.
[16] Rane, N. L., (2016). Application of value engineering
techniques in building construction projects.
International Journal of Engineering Sciences &
Technology, 5(7).
[17] Rane, N., Lopes, S., Raval, A., Rumao, D., & Thakur,
M. P. (2017). Study of effects of labour productivity
on construction projects. International Journal of
Engineering Sciences and Research Technology,
6(6), 15-20.
[18] Hussain, S., Mubeen, M., & Karuppannan, S. (2022).
Land use and land cover (LULC) change analysis
using TM, ETM+ and OLI Landsat images in district
of Okara, Punjab, Pakistan. Physics and Chemistry of
the Earth, Parts a/b/c, 126, 103117.
[19] Natarajan, K., Latva-Käyrä, P., Zyadin, A., &
Pelkonen, P. (2016). New methodological approach
for biomass resource assessment in India using GIS
application and land use/land cover (LULC) maps.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 63, 256-
268.
[20] Reis, S. (2008). Analyzing land use/land cover
changes using remote sensing and GIS in Rize,
North-East Turkey. Sensors, 8(10), 6188-6202.
[21] Paudel, B., Zhang, Y. L., Li, S. C., Liu, L. S., Wu, X.,
& Khanal, N. R. (2016). Review of studies on land
use and land cover change in Nepal. Journal of
Mountain Science, 13, 643-660.
[22] Rane, N. L., Anand, A., Deepak K., (2023).
Evaluating the Selection Criteria of Formwork
System (FS) for RCC Building Construction.
International Journal of Engineering Trends and
Technology, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 197-205. Crossref,
https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-
V71I3P220
[23] Achari, A., Rane, N. L., Gangar B., (2023).
Framework Towards Achieving Sustainable
Strategies for Water Usage and Wastage in Building
Construction. International Journal of Engineering
Trends and Technology, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 385-394.
Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-
V71I3P241
[24] Rwanga, S. S., & Ndambuki, J. M. (2017). Accuracy
assessment of land use/land cover classification using
remote sensing and GIS. International Journal of
Geosciences, 8(04), 611.
[25] Lu, D., Li, G., Valladares, G. S., & Batistella, M.
(2004). Mapping soil erosion risk in Rondonia,
Brazilian Amazonia: using RUSLE, remote sensing
and GIS. Land degradation & development, 15(5),
499-512.
[26] Vivekananda, G. N., Swathi, R., & Sujith, A. V. L. N.
(2021). Multi-temporal image analysis for LULC
classification and change detection. European journal
of remote sensing, 54(sup2), 189-199.
[27] Ahmad, F., Goparaju, L., & Qayum, A. (2017).
LULC analysis of urban spaces using Markov chain
predictive model at Ranchi in India. Spatial
Information Research, 25(3), 351-359.
[28] Roy, P. S., & Roy, A. (2010). Land use and land
cover change in India: Aremote sensing & GIS
prespective. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science,
90(4), 489-502.

Effectiveness and Capability of Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS): A Powerful Tool for Land use and Land Cover (LULC) Change and Accuracy Assessment

More Related Content

Similar to Effectiveness and Capability of Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS): A Powerful Tool for Land use and Land Cover (LULC) Change and Accuracy Assessment

More from nitinrane33

Recently uploaded

Effectiveness and Capability of Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS): A Powerful Tool for Land use and Land Cover (LULC) Change and Accuracy Assessment