What’s changed since Eldis was set up,
and what does it mean for the future?
Eldis 20th
Anniversary Workshop: Learning from 20
years of digital knowledge sharing for global
development
15 September 2016
Geoff Barnard
www.ids.ac.uk
Knowledge sharing for
development
1
geoff@barnards.plus.com
Where’s
the bar?
The ascent of intermediary man
Thinking
Technology
User expectations
Donor appetites and priorities
Global development landscape
What’s changed since 1996?
1996 2016A Lot !
Phases
1996 201620102000 2005 2015
0 1 2 3 4 5
0. Pre-Eldis Phase (before 1996)
1. The Early Days (1996-2000)
First there was empty
(cyber) space
Research comms in infancy
The Policy Briefing was quite a
revolutionary concept
Nobody knew if the internet
would catch on
An era of experimentation
(launch of Eldis, id21, Euforic,
Bellanet)
Conventional library role under
scrutiny
2. Catching the wave (2001-2005)
First there was empty
(cyber) space
Web clearly taking off
Research comms gathering
steam (RAPID)
KM hits the development sector
(World Bank  Knowledge Bank)
A burst of new initiatives (GDNet,
Development Gateway, SciDev,
DFID Resource Centres,
DGroups)
DFID budget expanding, other
donors getting on board
3. Riding the wave (2006-2010)
First there was empty
(cyber) space
Research comms more
sophisticated & mainstream
Knowledge intermediary role
being recognised and studied
Rise of mobile phones
Web 2.0 opening new avenues
(wikis, online communities,
crowd sourcing)
Lot’s of hype but no one very
sure which way it’s all going
Funding easy to find (in UK)
4. High tide (2010-2015)
First there was empty
(cyber) space
Social media taking off
Open knowledge gaining
foothold (GOKH, MOOCs)
Knowledge hubs for big
programmes
Demand side focus (BCURE)
Proving impact still elusive
Getting harder to fund
collection and curation work
KM going out of vogue
5. Today (2016)
First there was empty
(cyber) space
ICTs more powerful than ever
Big data
Mobile devices ubiquitous
We want it now, we want it free
Research comms embedded
Hard to fund free-standing
intermediary work
Some big initiatives winding down
Renewed focus on learning
A detour into the climate world
Big new priority area
Massive need for reliable
information at all levels
Portal proliferation
syndrome
Silo tendency
If in doubt – hold a
workshop!
Encouraging signs of progress
Growing community of practice
Strong collaborative ethos
Some clever data sharing
tools  the ‘knowledge grid’
An emerging vision
New focus on capacity
building
The Achilles heel
Ouch, we’ve
run out of
funding
Ouch, we’ve
run out of
funding
It all hinges on people
Effective knowledge sharing does not happen by magic
It requires skills, dedication, ingenuity, support systems,
a conducive setting, funding…
What’s not changed since 1996?
So where is this all going?
Technology drivers:
Atomisation, AI, Big data
Dominance of big
players (Google, Facebook,
etc.)
 Connectivity
Research drivers:
Ever more crowded
marketplace
Northern dominance 
Pressure to show impact
Development drivers:
World more complex &
interconnected than ever
Knowledge at a premium
Funding drivers:
Aid under scrutiny
New donors emerging
Politics
Where does this leave the user?
Where to from here?
… let’s discuss!
Pack up our portals and
head for the bar?
Regroup, reinvent, and
radically improve our
funding pitch?

Eldis 20th Anniversary Workshop 2016: Geoff Barnard

  • 1.
    What’s changed sinceEldis was set up, and what does it mean for the future? Eldis 20th Anniversary Workshop: Learning from 20 years of digital knowledge sharing for global development 15 September 2016 Geoff Barnard www.ids.ac.uk Knowledge sharing for development 1 [email protected]
  • 2.
    Where’s the bar? The ascentof intermediary man
  • 3.
    Thinking Technology User expectations Donor appetitesand priorities Global development landscape What’s changed since 1996? 1996 2016A Lot !
  • 4.
  • 5.
    0. Pre-Eldis Phase(before 1996)
  • 6.
    1. The EarlyDays (1996-2000) First there was empty (cyber) space Research comms in infancy The Policy Briefing was quite a revolutionary concept Nobody knew if the internet would catch on An era of experimentation (launch of Eldis, id21, Euforic, Bellanet) Conventional library role under scrutiny
  • 7.
    2. Catching thewave (2001-2005) First there was empty (cyber) space Web clearly taking off Research comms gathering steam (RAPID) KM hits the development sector (World Bank  Knowledge Bank) A burst of new initiatives (GDNet, Development Gateway, SciDev, DFID Resource Centres, DGroups) DFID budget expanding, other donors getting on board
  • 8.
    3. Riding thewave (2006-2010) First there was empty (cyber) space Research comms more sophisticated & mainstream Knowledge intermediary role being recognised and studied Rise of mobile phones Web 2.0 opening new avenues (wikis, online communities, crowd sourcing) Lot’s of hype but no one very sure which way it’s all going Funding easy to find (in UK)
  • 9.
    4. High tide(2010-2015) First there was empty (cyber) space Social media taking off Open knowledge gaining foothold (GOKH, MOOCs) Knowledge hubs for big programmes Demand side focus (BCURE) Proving impact still elusive Getting harder to fund collection and curation work KM going out of vogue
  • 10.
    5. Today (2016) Firstthere was empty (cyber) space ICTs more powerful than ever Big data Mobile devices ubiquitous We want it now, we want it free Research comms embedded Hard to fund free-standing intermediary work Some big initiatives winding down Renewed focus on learning
  • 11.
    A detour intothe climate world Big new priority area Massive need for reliable information at all levels Portal proliferation syndrome Silo tendency If in doubt – hold a workshop!
  • 12.
    Encouraging signs ofprogress Growing community of practice Strong collaborative ethos Some clever data sharing tools  the ‘knowledge grid’ An emerging vision New focus on capacity building
  • 13.
    The Achilles heel Ouch,we’ve run out of funding Ouch, we’ve run out of funding
  • 14.
    It all hingeson people Effective knowledge sharing does not happen by magic It requires skills, dedication, ingenuity, support systems, a conducive setting, funding… What’s not changed since 1996?
  • 15.
    So where isthis all going? Technology drivers: Atomisation, AI, Big data Dominance of big players (Google, Facebook, etc.)  Connectivity Research drivers: Ever more crowded marketplace Northern dominance  Pressure to show impact Development drivers: World more complex & interconnected than ever Knowledge at a premium Funding drivers: Aid under scrutiny New donors emerging Politics
  • 16.
    Where does thisleave the user?
  • 17.
    Where to fromhere? … let’s discuss! Pack up our portals and head for the bar? Regroup, reinvent, and radically improve our funding pitch?