The science of genomics and livestock genetic improvement
The document discusses advancements in livestock genetic improvement, particularly through genomics and marker-assisted selection, highlighting significant increases in breeding efficiency and genetic gains. It details international collaborations and breeding programs in low-income countries, aiming to leverage genomic selection for improved livestock traits. The impact of these advancements on yield and health traits is emphasized, along with the necessity of immediate benefits for participating farmers.
Introduction to genomics in livestock breeding, highlighting advancements and authors' affiliations.
Comparison of breeding traits from the 1960s to 2005 showing significant improvements in yield (e.g., FCR reduced by 43%).
Explanation of complex traits influenced by genes and environment, alongside classical models of genotype, phenotype, and environment.
Transition to genomics with QTL and Marker Assisted Selection (MAS), emphasizing advantages like early DNA measurement and computational strategies.
Discussion on accuracy and parameters affecting genomic selection, including training animals and cost-benefit ratios.
Significant reductions in generation intervals and considerable genetic gains observed, with improvements in yield and health traits through genomic selection. International efforts for measuring tricky traits, and strategies for genomic selection in low-income countries through organized programs.
Examples like the African Dairy Genetics Gains program showcasing stakeholder involvement and farmer feedback via technology.
The science of genomics and livestock genetic improvement
1.
The science ofgenomics and
livestock genetic improvement
Dirk Jan de Koning, Getinet Mekuriaw Tarekegn &
Erling Strandberg
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, SLU
[email protected]
2.
Advances from breedingin the
devloped world
Species Trait 60s 2005 %-
increase
Broilers Days till 2 kg 100 40 60
Fillet, % 12 20 67
FCR 3,0 1,7 43
Layers Eggs/year 230 300 30
Eggs/ 1000 kg feed 5000 9000 80
Source: Table 1 i Van der Steen et al. J. Anim. Sci. 2005. 83:E1-E8
woodleywonderworks under Creative Commons
3.
Thanks to plantand animal
breeding
60s 2005 Reduced
acreage
Feed(kg) Ha Feed
(kg)
Ha
1000 kg lean
pork
11750 6,5 5880 2,6 2,5x
1000 kg broiler
meat
3000 1,7 1700 0,37 4,6x
10000 eggs 2000 1,1 1111 0,24 4,6x
Creative Commons: Neil Palmer Creative Commons: woodleywonderworks Creative Commons: jere-me/
4.
The observed traitis sum of many genes
and environmental factors
Complex Traits
Marker Assisted Selection
Accelerategenetic progress
Measure DNA Markers early in life
Even in embryos
Sex limited traits
Milk
Litter size
Traits measured in relatives
Meat quality traits!
8.
Three starting pointsfor MAS
Ease of
Detection Use
Functional mutations
- known genes
Q
q
M
m
Q
q
Markers in pop.-wide LD
with functional mutation
Markers in pop.-wide LE
with functional mutation
Q
q
M
m
genes
GAS
LD-markers
LD-MAS
LE-markers
LE-MAS
MAS
• Find QTLor genes and
select specifically for
favourable alleles
• Need strategy to
combine with EBV
• LE-MAS computationally
intensive
• LE-MAS has major
genotyping requirements
Genomic Selection
• Estimate effects
across all markers
and select on the
sum of effects
• Replaces EBV
• Can be very
computationally
intensive
• Major genotyping
requirements
12.
Genomic Selection: Accuracy
Veryimportant when considering Genomic
Selection:
What accuracy can I achieve?
How many animals do I need for training?
How many markers do I need?
What is the cost-benefit ratio?
Generation intervals reduceddramatically
Sires for bulls: ~7 => 2,5 years
Dams for bulls: 4 => 2,5 years
Selection differentials quite constant
Genetic trends improved a lot
Genetic gains increased
50-100% for yield traits
3x – 4x for traits with low heritability
19.
International efforts fortricky
traits
Some traits are very expensive or difficult to measure. For
example methane emission and individual feed intake.
Large collaborations: each country (including Sweden)
measures a number of cows
Concern: genetic differences and GxE
20.
Genomic Selection
• Hasdoubled genetic progress for yield traits in dairy, 2-4-
fold improvement for health traits!
• Other species following suit.
• Special case for crossbreeding species.
• Crop breeding has been turned on its head by genomic
selection
• How do we deliver the benefits of modern breeding to
low-income countries?
• Faster in crops because seeds are easily stored and distributed!
21.
Options for genomicselection in
low income countries
• Nucleus breeding programs
• Centrally organized
• Generic breeding goal
• Good potential for species like poultry
• Community based breeding programs
• Locally organized
• Use locally adapted genetic resources
• May struggle to get suitable reference population
• Any participatory approach needs immediate benefits for
the participating farmers: not in the future.
22.
Current examples
• AfricanDairy Genetics Gains
• Funded by ‘GATES’ foundation
• Strong stakeholder involvement
• Farmers submit data to the ADGG platform
• Farmers receive feedback via iCOW:
=> 3 SMS/week
Drip feeding manuals to farmers
Mainly improved farm health
• IlRI’s Livestock Genetics program: LiveGene