There are 5 types of evaluation
 Formative: Evaluates a program during development
in order to make early improvements. ...
 Summative: Provides information on program
effectiveness. ...
 Process : Focuses on program implementation. ...
 Outcomes:
 Impact. :
Formative assessment
 a rigorous assessment process designed to
identify potential and actual influences on the
progress and effectiveness of implementation
efforts.
 Formative assessments are generally low stakes, which
means that they have low or no point value. Examples
of formative assessments include asking students
to: draw a concept map in class to represent their
understanding of a topic. submit one or two
sentences identifying the main point of a lecture.
Summative evaluation
 The goal of summative assessment is to evaluate
student learning at the end of an instructional
unit by comparing it against some standard or
benchmark.
 Summative assessments are often high stakes, which
means that they have a high point value. Examples of
summative assessments include: a midterm exam. a
final project.
Process evaluation
 A process evaluation examines the extent to which a
program is operating as intended by assessing
ongoing program operations and determining
whether the target population is being served.
 A process evaluation focuses on the
implementation process and attempts to
determine how successfully the project followed
the strategy laid out in the logic model.
 a process evaluation focuses on the first three
segments of the logic model (inputs, activities,
outcome)
Outcome evaluation
 Outcome evaluation is a method of determining how
well a program achieved its objectives by measuring
results. To ascertain how well a program achieved desired
objectives, it is first important to have clearly defined
objectives. Next, there must be a way to measure how well
the objectives are being achieved.
 Impact or outcome evaluations are undertaken when it is
important to know whether and how well the
objectives of a project or program were met. For
example, outcome questions for a smoking cessation
program might include: Did the program succeed in
helping people to stop smoking?
Impact evaluation
 Impact evaluation is an assessment of how the
intervention being evaluated affects. outcomes,
whether these effects are intended or unintended.
 What Are the Steps in Implementing an Impact
Assessment?
 Select the Project(s) to be Assessed.
 Conduct an Evaluability Assessment.
 Prepare a Research Plan.
 Contract and Staff the Impact Assessment.
 Carry out the Field Research and Analyze its Results.
 Disseminate the Impact Assessment Findings.
Program evaluation
 Evaluation is the systematic application of
scientific methods to assess the design,
implementation, improvement or outcomes of a
program
 Program evaluation can include any or a variety of at
least 35 different types of evaluation, such as for needs
assessments, accreditation, cost/benefit analysis,
effectiveness, efficiency, formative, summative,
goal- based, process, outcomes, etc.
Types of program evaluation
 It is important to understand the different types of
evaluation that can be conducted over a program's life-
cycle and when they should be used. The main types of
evaluation are process, impact, outcome and
summative evaluation.
Steps in program evaluation
 The program evaluation process goes through four
phases — planning, implementation, completion,
and dissemination and reporting — that
complement the phases of program development and
implementation.
Goals of PE
 The purpose of program evaluation is to
systematically collect information about program
activities and objectives, monitor progress, and to
report and communicate results to network
members, partners, stakeholders, and
community.
 A framework for program evaluation
 Engage stakeholders.
 Describe the program.
 Focus the evaluation design.
 Gather credible evidence.
 Justify conclusions.
 Ensure use and share lessons learned.

evaluation-guidance and councseling

  • 4.
    There are 5types of evaluation  Formative: Evaluates a program during development in order to make early improvements. ...  Summative: Provides information on program effectiveness. ...  Process : Focuses on program implementation. ...  Outcomes:  Impact. :
  • 6.
    Formative assessment  arigorous assessment process designed to identify potential and actual influences on the progress and effectiveness of implementation efforts.  Formative assessments are generally low stakes, which means that they have low or no point value. Examples of formative assessments include asking students to: draw a concept map in class to represent their understanding of a topic. submit one or two sentences identifying the main point of a lecture.
  • 7.
    Summative evaluation  Thegoal of summative assessment is to evaluate student learning at the end of an instructional unit by comparing it against some standard or benchmark.  Summative assessments are often high stakes, which means that they have a high point value. Examples of summative assessments include: a midterm exam. a final project.
  • 8.
    Process evaluation  Aprocess evaluation examines the extent to which a program is operating as intended by assessing ongoing program operations and determining whether the target population is being served.  A process evaluation focuses on the implementation process and attempts to determine how successfully the project followed the strategy laid out in the logic model.  a process evaluation focuses on the first three segments of the logic model (inputs, activities, outcome)
  • 9.
    Outcome evaluation  Outcomeevaluation is a method of determining how well a program achieved its objectives by measuring results. To ascertain how well a program achieved desired objectives, it is first important to have clearly defined objectives. Next, there must be a way to measure how well the objectives are being achieved.  Impact or outcome evaluations are undertaken when it is important to know whether and how well the objectives of a project or program were met. For example, outcome questions for a smoking cessation program might include: Did the program succeed in helping people to stop smoking?
  • 10.
    Impact evaluation  Impactevaluation is an assessment of how the intervention being evaluated affects. outcomes, whether these effects are intended or unintended.  What Are the Steps in Implementing an Impact Assessment?  Select the Project(s) to be Assessed.  Conduct an Evaluability Assessment.  Prepare a Research Plan.  Contract and Staff the Impact Assessment.  Carry out the Field Research and Analyze its Results.  Disseminate the Impact Assessment Findings.
  • 11.
    Program evaluation  Evaluationis the systematic application of scientific methods to assess the design, implementation, improvement or outcomes of a program  Program evaluation can include any or a variety of at least 35 different types of evaluation, such as for needs assessments, accreditation, cost/benefit analysis, effectiveness, efficiency, formative, summative, goal- based, process, outcomes, etc.
  • 12.
    Types of programevaluation  It is important to understand the different types of evaluation that can be conducted over a program's life- cycle and when they should be used. The main types of evaluation are process, impact, outcome and summative evaluation.
  • 13.
    Steps in programevaluation  The program evaluation process goes through four phases — planning, implementation, completion, and dissemination and reporting — that complement the phases of program development and implementation.
  • 14.
    Goals of PE The purpose of program evaluation is to systematically collect information about program activities and objectives, monitor progress, and to report and communicate results to network members, partners, stakeholders, and community.
  • 15.
     A frameworkfor program evaluation  Engage stakeholders.  Describe the program.  Focus the evaluation design.  Gather credible evidence.  Justify conclusions.  Ensure use and share lessons learned.