EVs 101
Electric Vehicles 101
An Introduction
By Dan Lauber
Nov 13, 2009
EVs 101
Electric Vehicles 101
 A Brief History
 Advantages
 Challenges
 Meeting the Challenge
 EV’s Today
 EV’s at MIT
EVs 101
Kinds of Electric Vehicles
Locomotives Golf Carts Fork Lifts
Busses Nuclear Submarines Elevators
Sources: www.umcycling.com/mbtabus.html, GE, Toyota
EVs 101
Kinds of Electric Cars
Hydrogen Fuel Cell
Solar Racer Hybrid
Full-Size
Battery Electric
Neighborhood
Electric
MIT CityCar
Sources: Honda, Toyota, GEM, MIT
EVs 101
History of EV’s
 1830’s
 Battery electric vehicle invented by
Thomas Davenport, Robert Anderson,
others - using non-rechargeable
batteries
 Davenport’s car holds all vehicle land
speed records until ~1900
 1890’s
 EV’s outsold gas cars 10 to 1, Oldsmobile
and Studebaker started as EV companies
 1904
 First speeding ticket, issued to driver of
an EV
 Krieger Company builds first hybrid
vehicle
 1910’s
 Mass-produced Ford cars undercut
hand-built EV’s
 EV’s persist as status symbols and utility
vehicles until Great Depression
Ford Electric #2
Detroit Electric
Source: http://www.eaaev.org/History/index.html
EVs 101
1968 – Great Electric Car Race
 Trans-continental race between MIT and Caltech
 53 charging stations, spaced 60 mi apart
 MIT’s car used $20k of NiCd batteries ($122k in 2008
dollars), CalTech’s cost $600
EVs 101
1970 - Clean Air Car Race
50+ cars raced from MIT to Caltech
using many alternative powertrains
CalTech – Regenerative braking
Boston Electric Car Club – Battery
Swapping
Toronto University – Parallel hybrid
design very similar to modern Prius
architecture
MIT – Series hybrid and electrically
commutated motor
Sources: see http://mit.edu/evt/CleanAirCarRace.html
EVs 101
1990’s – EV1:Who Killed the Electric Car?
 Program cost > $1bn
 800 units leased
 $574/mo. Lease without
state rebates
 2 seats
 80-140 mi. range
MSRP $33,999
Real Pricetag
(estimated)
$80,000+
GM’s actual cost
per vehicle leased
$1,250,000
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_EV1
AKA: Would you have bought it? REALLY?
EVs 101
What is an EV?
And how does it work?
EVs 101
Electrification
Motor/
Generator
Battery Fuel
Transmission
Engine
Fuel
Transmission
Engine
Battery
Transmission
Motor/
Generator
Battery Electric
Hybrid
Conventional
EVs 101
Degrees of Hybridization
The vehicle is a….
If it…
Automatically stops/starts the engine
in stop-and-go traffic
Uses regenerative braking and
operates above 60 volts
Uses an electric motor to assist a
combustion engine
Can drive at times using only the
electric motor
Recharges batteries from a wall outlet
for extended all-electric range
Source: http://www.hybridcenter.org/hybrid-center-how-hybrid-cars-work-under-the-hood.html
Micro
Hybrid
Citroën C3
Mild
Hybrid
Honda Insight
Plug-in
Hybrid
Chevy Volt
Full
Hybrid
Toyota Prius
Efficiency
EVs 101
Energy Loss : City Driving
Engine Loss
76%
Engine
Standby
8%
Driveline
Losses
3%
Driveline
Aero
3%
Rolling
4%
Braking
6%
Fuel Tank
100%
16% 13%
POWERTRAIN VEHICLE-Related
Urban Drive Cycle Energy Balance
2005 3 L Toyota Camry
EVs 101
Energy Loss : Highway Driving
Engine Loss
77%
Engine
Standby
0%
Driveline
Losses
4%
Driveline
Aero
10%
Rolling
7%
Braking
2%
Fuel Tank:
100%
23% 19%
POWERTRAIN
VEHICLE-Related
Highway Drive Cycle Energy Balance
2005 3 L Toyota Camry
EVs 101
•Can eliminate engine entirely
•Engine downsizing
•Decoupling of engine and wheel
Energy Saving : Hybrid Systems
Engine Loss
76%
Engine
Standby
8%
Driveline
Losses
3%
Driveline
Aero
3%
Rolling
4%
Braking
6%
Fuel Tank:
100%
16% 13%
Micro Hybrid
Eliminates
Mild Hybrid
Reduces
Plug-in
Full Hybrid
Reduces
EVs 101
Energy Loss : City Driving – Electric Vehicle
Motor Loss
10%
Motor
Driveline
Losses
14%
Driveline
Aero
29%
Rolling
35%
Braking
11%
Batteries
100%
90% 76%
POWERTRAIN VEHICLE-Related
Urban Drive Cycle Energy Balance
EVs 101
Well-to-Wheels Efficiency
Generation
33%
Transmission
94%
Plug-to-Wheels
76%
Refining
82%
Transmission
98%
Pump-to-Wheels
16%
23%
13%
31%
80%
Well-to-Tank Tank-to-Wheels
31% 76% = 23%
80% 16% = 13%
[http://www.nesea.org/]]
Source: http://www.nesea.org
EVs 101
How PHEV’s Work
 All-electric range
 Get home with exactly
no battery left
 Charge-sustaining
mode
[Tate, Harpster, and Savagian 2008]
EVs 101
Technical
EVs 101
What is an EPA rating?
 Conditions
 Drive cycle: e.g. city or
highway cycle, real-
world, or constant
speed
 Test temperature
 Start: (warm or cold)
Fuel: convert to
gasoline-equivalent
 Test mass: (accounts for
passengers and cargo)
 MPGe rating
 PHEV’s
EVs 101
Terminology
 State of charge (SOC)
 Battery capacity, expressed as a percentage of maximum capacity
 Depth of Discharge (DOD)
 The percentage of battery capacity that has been discharged
 Capacity
 The total Amp-hours (Amp-hr) available when the battery is
discharged at a specific current (specified as a C-rate) from 100%
SOC
 Energy
 The total Watt-hours (Wh) available when the battery is
discharged at a specific current (specified as a C-rate) from 100%
SOC
 Specific Energy (Wh/kg)
 The total Watt-hours (Wh) per unit mass
 Specific Power
 Maximum power (Watts) that the battery can provide per unit
mass, function of internal resistance of battery
EVs 101
Benefits
EVs 101
Benefits of EVs and PHEVs
 More efficient, lower fuel costs, lower
emissions
 Simpler transmission, fewer moving parts
 Fuel Choice
 Oil/energy independence
 Emissions improve with time
 Emissions at few large locations is easier to
control than millions of tailpipes
EVs 101
V2G (Vehicle to Grid) Technology
 Allows communication between utility and vehicle
 Allow integration of more renewables like wind
 Used EV batteries could be used as stationary
batteries for utilities
 With so much focus on energy efficiency reducing
electricity sales and expensive renewable energy
generation mandated, EVs could be a welcome new
segment for utilities
 They could still be a nightmare
 Batteries could provide ancillary services
Source: McKinsey
EVs 101
Night-time Charging
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
7:12 AM 12:00 PM 4:48 PM 9:36 PM 2:24 AM 7:12 AM 12:00 PM
MW
Demand
.
Peak wind power
production
EVs 101
Electricity Sources
EVs 101
Power Grid Capacity
Source: McKinsey, Mike Khusid
When BEV’s represent 20% of the vehicle market,
they comprise only 2% of the power market
EVs 101
Operating Costs
On-board energy consumption 300 Wh/mile
Charging Efficiency 90%
Electricity consumption 333 Wh/mile
Electricity Cost 10 cents/mile
Driving Cost (electricity only) 3.3 cents/mile
Fuel economy 25 MPG
Fuel Cost $2.00/gallon
Driving Cost (fuel only) 8.0 cents/mile
Conventional Gasoline Vehicle
Battery Electric Vehicle
At 15,000 miles/year, you would
save $700/year on fuel
The estimated price range for
advanced batteries is
$500 - $1,000 per kWh
~ buying 1 kWh of battery
energy (~3 miles of electric
range) each year
EVs 101
CO2 Emissions
EVs 101
Biofuels vs. Biomass, Solar
 Biomass Electricity about 80% more efficient
than Biofuel
 Solar Panels to charge a car would fit on your
roof.
EVs 101
Challenges
Why don’t they catch on? A conspiracy?
EVs 101
Gasoline: The (almost) perfect fuel
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density
EVs 101
Energy Equivalency
135 MJ
of energy
21 Li-ion batteries
(Car battery size)
2.7 kg
340
kg
Gas
1 Gallon
Batteries
54 gal
EVs 101
Challenges
 Limited Range
 Large battery weight/size
 Long Charge times
 High initial cost
 Battery life
 Consumer acceptance
 Grid Integration
EVs 101
Operating Costs
 In Europe, $60/barrel oil is enough,
 In the US, $4/gal gas is needed to be price competitive
EVs 101
Addressing customer perception
 Accepting limited range
 Most people drive less than 40 mi/day
 Most cars are parked 23 hours of the day anyway
 Smaller vehicles & reduced performance
 In the last 30 years, nearly 100% of efficiency
improvements have gone to increasing vehicle size
and performance, not reducing consumption
 How do you get people to charge at the right
time?
Source: On the Road in 2035, Heywood, et.al.
EVs 101
Meeting the
Challenges
EVs 101
Range Anxiety
 Battery Swapping vs. Fast Charging
Source: http://pneumaticaddict.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/hybridcarscom-mercedes-rejects-electric-car-battery-swapping/
EVs 101
Better Place Model
Business plan like that of
mobile phone
Better Place owns the
batteries, the consumer
pays for energy (miles)
Plan includes charging
stations and battery
swapping
So far: Israel, Denmark
Australia, California,
Hawaii, and Canada
100,000 charging stations
planned for Hawaii by
2012
EVs 101
Rapid Charging
 Batteries
 Altairnano
 A123
 Balance of system
 Rapid Charge Stations – Don’t need many
 Refueling a car is ~10MW going through your hand
EVs 101
Batteries
 Lithium sources
 We’re not Lithium constrained
 Abundant
 Recyclable
 Recycling – 90% recoverable
 Extending battery life
 Battery management systems
 Weight/Volume reductions
 Alternative chemistries
EVs 101
Battery Cost : Learning Curves
Source: McKinsey Quarterly: Electrifying Cars: How three industries will evolve
EVs 101
Initial Cost
 Companies that sell cars, but lease the
batteries
 Leases like Power Purchase Agreements
 Split operating cost savings with financer
 Charging Infrastructure
 Charging subscription plans
EVs 101
2008 Federal Plug-in Electric Drive Vehicle Tax Credit
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Battery Energy (kWh)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Miles
Tax Credit Value
Battery Cost (Low)
Battery Cost (Mid)
Battery Cost (High)
Electric Range (Estimate)
EVs 101
Adoption Rate of EV’s
Source: Thomas Becker, UC Berkeley, 2009
EVs 101
Looking Forward
 Tipping point will be ~2020 when 10% of vehicles sold
will be BEV’s
 Battery cost: ~$700-$1,500 / kWh, down to $420 by
2015, but still too high.
 Price Premium
 PHEV40 $11,800 > ICE
 EV100 $24,100 > ICE
 Long-term PHEV’s will beat out HEV’s
 PHEV’s likely to dominate BEVs
 A 30-50% reduction in fuel consumption by 2035
*Heywood
 47% reduction by 2030 *McKinsey
Source: McKinsey Quarterly: Electrifying Cars: How three industries will evolve ;
http://newenergynews.blogspot.com/2009/08/mckinsey-looks-at-coming-ev-phenomenon.html
EVs 101
EVs NOW
When can I get one?
EVs 101
EV’s Today
EVs 101
Tesla Roadster
Top speed: 125 mph
Acceleration: 0-60 in 3.7 sec
Range: 244 mi
MSRP: $110,000
EVs 101
EV’s Available Soon
Fisker Karma (PHEV50)
$87,900 Delivery 2010
Tesla Model S
$57,400 Delivery ~2012
2011 Chevy Volt (PHEV40)
$40,000
EVs 101
EV’s Available Soon
2010 Mitsubishi I MIEV
$24,000 (Japan)
2010 Aptera 2e
~$25,000 (PHEV100)
Th!nk City
~$25,000 (europe)
2010 Nissan Leaf
$25,000 (30 min charge)
And many others…
EVs 101
@MIT
EVs Around the Institute
EVs 101
MIT Electric Vehicle Team (EVT)
 Porsche
 elEVen
 eMoto
 TTXGP
EVs 101
MIT EVT
EVs 101
MIT Vehicle Design Summit
 Student team working
towards a 100+ mpg vehicle
 Series hybrid architecture
 Lightweight body and
chassis
 Life cycle cost analysis and
minimization
 Shared use model for
transportation efficiency
 Contact Anna Jaffe,
ajaffe@mit.edu
EVs 101
MIT Solar Electric Vehicle Team
 Founded in 1985
 Design, build and race
solar cars
 Just placed 2nd in the
10th World Solar
Challenge
 mitsolar.com
EVs 101
MIT Vehicle Stuff
 EVT
 SEVT
 Vehicle Design Summit
 Transportation @ MIT
 Sloan Lab Seminars
 Media Lab – City Car, course
 Spinoffs
 A123
 Solectria
 Genasun
EVs 101
Thank You
 “No single technology development or alternative fuel can solve the problems
of growing transportation fuel use and GHG emissions.” – John Heywood
 Dan Lauber – djlauber@mit.edu
http://mit.edu/evt

EVs motor introdu101 - 11-13-09(web).ppt

  • 1.
    EVs 101 Electric Vehicles101 An Introduction By Dan Lauber Nov 13, 2009
  • 2.
    EVs 101 Electric Vehicles101  A Brief History  Advantages  Challenges  Meeting the Challenge  EV’s Today  EV’s at MIT
  • 3.
    EVs 101 Kinds ofElectric Vehicles Locomotives Golf Carts Fork Lifts Busses Nuclear Submarines Elevators Sources: www.umcycling.com/mbtabus.html, GE, Toyota
  • 4.
    EVs 101 Kinds ofElectric Cars Hydrogen Fuel Cell Solar Racer Hybrid Full-Size Battery Electric Neighborhood Electric MIT CityCar Sources: Honda, Toyota, GEM, MIT
  • 5.
    EVs 101 History ofEV’s  1830’s  Battery electric vehicle invented by Thomas Davenport, Robert Anderson, others - using non-rechargeable batteries  Davenport’s car holds all vehicle land speed records until ~1900  1890’s  EV’s outsold gas cars 10 to 1, Oldsmobile and Studebaker started as EV companies  1904  First speeding ticket, issued to driver of an EV  Krieger Company builds first hybrid vehicle  1910’s  Mass-produced Ford cars undercut hand-built EV’s  EV’s persist as status symbols and utility vehicles until Great Depression Ford Electric #2 Detroit Electric Source: http://www.eaaev.org/History/index.html
  • 6.
    EVs 101 1968 –Great Electric Car Race  Trans-continental race between MIT and Caltech  53 charging stations, spaced 60 mi apart  MIT’s car used $20k of NiCd batteries ($122k in 2008 dollars), CalTech’s cost $600
  • 7.
    EVs 101 1970 -Clean Air Car Race 50+ cars raced from MIT to Caltech using many alternative powertrains CalTech – Regenerative braking Boston Electric Car Club – Battery Swapping Toronto University – Parallel hybrid design very similar to modern Prius architecture MIT – Series hybrid and electrically commutated motor Sources: see http://mit.edu/evt/CleanAirCarRace.html
  • 8.
    EVs 101 1990’s –EV1:Who Killed the Electric Car?  Program cost > $1bn  800 units leased  $574/mo. Lease without state rebates  2 seats  80-140 mi. range MSRP $33,999 Real Pricetag (estimated) $80,000+ GM’s actual cost per vehicle leased $1,250,000 Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_EV1 AKA: Would you have bought it? REALLY?
  • 9.
    EVs 101 What isan EV? And how does it work?
  • 10.
  • 11.
    EVs 101 Degrees ofHybridization The vehicle is a…. If it… Automatically stops/starts the engine in stop-and-go traffic Uses regenerative braking and operates above 60 volts Uses an electric motor to assist a combustion engine Can drive at times using only the electric motor Recharges batteries from a wall outlet for extended all-electric range Source: http://www.hybridcenter.org/hybrid-center-how-hybrid-cars-work-under-the-hood.html Micro Hybrid Citroën C3 Mild Hybrid Honda Insight Plug-in Hybrid Chevy Volt Full Hybrid Toyota Prius Efficiency
  • 12.
    EVs 101 Energy Loss: City Driving Engine Loss 76% Engine Standby 8% Driveline Losses 3% Driveline Aero 3% Rolling 4% Braking 6% Fuel Tank 100% 16% 13% POWERTRAIN VEHICLE-Related Urban Drive Cycle Energy Balance 2005 3 L Toyota Camry
  • 13.
    EVs 101 Energy Loss: Highway Driving Engine Loss 77% Engine Standby 0% Driveline Losses 4% Driveline Aero 10% Rolling 7% Braking 2% Fuel Tank: 100% 23% 19% POWERTRAIN VEHICLE-Related Highway Drive Cycle Energy Balance 2005 3 L Toyota Camry
  • 14.
    EVs 101 •Can eliminateengine entirely •Engine downsizing •Decoupling of engine and wheel Energy Saving : Hybrid Systems Engine Loss 76% Engine Standby 8% Driveline Losses 3% Driveline Aero 3% Rolling 4% Braking 6% Fuel Tank: 100% 16% 13% Micro Hybrid Eliminates Mild Hybrid Reduces Plug-in Full Hybrid Reduces
  • 15.
    EVs 101 Energy Loss: City Driving – Electric Vehicle Motor Loss 10% Motor Driveline Losses 14% Driveline Aero 29% Rolling 35% Braking 11% Batteries 100% 90% 76% POWERTRAIN VEHICLE-Related Urban Drive Cycle Energy Balance
  • 16.
    EVs 101 Well-to-Wheels Efficiency Generation 33% Transmission 94% Plug-to-Wheels 76% Refining 82% Transmission 98% Pump-to-Wheels 16% 23% 13% 31% 80% Well-to-TankTank-to-Wheels 31% 76% = 23% 80% 16% = 13% [http://www.nesea.org/]] Source: http://www.nesea.org
  • 17.
    EVs 101 How PHEV’sWork  All-electric range  Get home with exactly no battery left  Charge-sustaining mode [Tate, Harpster, and Savagian 2008]
  • 18.
  • 19.
    EVs 101 What isan EPA rating?  Conditions  Drive cycle: e.g. city or highway cycle, real- world, or constant speed  Test temperature  Start: (warm or cold) Fuel: convert to gasoline-equivalent  Test mass: (accounts for passengers and cargo)  MPGe rating  PHEV’s
  • 20.
    EVs 101 Terminology  Stateof charge (SOC)  Battery capacity, expressed as a percentage of maximum capacity  Depth of Discharge (DOD)  The percentage of battery capacity that has been discharged  Capacity  The total Amp-hours (Amp-hr) available when the battery is discharged at a specific current (specified as a C-rate) from 100% SOC  Energy  The total Watt-hours (Wh) available when the battery is discharged at a specific current (specified as a C-rate) from 100% SOC  Specific Energy (Wh/kg)  The total Watt-hours (Wh) per unit mass  Specific Power  Maximum power (Watts) that the battery can provide per unit mass, function of internal resistance of battery
  • 21.
  • 22.
    EVs 101 Benefits ofEVs and PHEVs  More efficient, lower fuel costs, lower emissions  Simpler transmission, fewer moving parts  Fuel Choice  Oil/energy independence  Emissions improve with time  Emissions at few large locations is easier to control than millions of tailpipes
  • 23.
    EVs 101 V2G (Vehicleto Grid) Technology  Allows communication between utility and vehicle  Allow integration of more renewables like wind  Used EV batteries could be used as stationary batteries for utilities  With so much focus on energy efficiency reducing electricity sales and expensive renewable energy generation mandated, EVs could be a welcome new segment for utilities  They could still be a nightmare  Batteries could provide ancillary services Source: McKinsey
  • 24.
    EVs 101 Night-time Charging 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 7:12AM 12:00 PM 4:48 PM 9:36 PM 2:24 AM 7:12 AM 12:00 PM MW Demand . Peak wind power production
  • 25.
  • 26.
    EVs 101 Power GridCapacity Source: McKinsey, Mike Khusid When BEV’s represent 20% of the vehicle market, they comprise only 2% of the power market
  • 27.
    EVs 101 Operating Costs On-boardenergy consumption 300 Wh/mile Charging Efficiency 90% Electricity consumption 333 Wh/mile Electricity Cost 10 cents/mile Driving Cost (electricity only) 3.3 cents/mile Fuel economy 25 MPG Fuel Cost $2.00/gallon Driving Cost (fuel only) 8.0 cents/mile Conventional Gasoline Vehicle Battery Electric Vehicle At 15,000 miles/year, you would save $700/year on fuel The estimated price range for advanced batteries is $500 - $1,000 per kWh ~ buying 1 kWh of battery energy (~3 miles of electric range) each year
  • 28.
  • 29.
    EVs 101 Biofuels vs.Biomass, Solar  Biomass Electricity about 80% more efficient than Biofuel  Solar Panels to charge a car would fit on your roof.
  • 30.
    EVs 101 Challenges Why don’tthey catch on? A conspiracy?
  • 31.
    EVs 101 Gasoline: The(almost) perfect fuel Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density
  • 32.
    EVs 101 Energy Equivalency 135MJ of energy 21 Li-ion batteries (Car battery size) 2.7 kg 340 kg Gas 1 Gallon Batteries 54 gal
  • 33.
    EVs 101 Challenges  LimitedRange  Large battery weight/size  Long Charge times  High initial cost  Battery life  Consumer acceptance  Grid Integration
  • 34.
    EVs 101 Operating Costs In Europe, $60/barrel oil is enough,  In the US, $4/gal gas is needed to be price competitive
  • 35.
    EVs 101 Addressing customerperception  Accepting limited range  Most people drive less than 40 mi/day  Most cars are parked 23 hours of the day anyway  Smaller vehicles & reduced performance  In the last 30 years, nearly 100% of efficiency improvements have gone to increasing vehicle size and performance, not reducing consumption  How do you get people to charge at the right time? Source: On the Road in 2035, Heywood, et.al.
  • 36.
  • 37.
    EVs 101 Range Anxiety Battery Swapping vs. Fast Charging Source: http://pneumaticaddict.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/hybridcarscom-mercedes-rejects-electric-car-battery-swapping/
  • 38.
    EVs 101 Better PlaceModel Business plan like that of mobile phone Better Place owns the batteries, the consumer pays for energy (miles) Plan includes charging stations and battery swapping So far: Israel, Denmark Australia, California, Hawaii, and Canada 100,000 charging stations planned for Hawaii by 2012
  • 39.
    EVs 101 Rapid Charging Batteries  Altairnano  A123  Balance of system  Rapid Charge Stations – Don’t need many  Refueling a car is ~10MW going through your hand
  • 40.
    EVs 101 Batteries  Lithiumsources  We’re not Lithium constrained  Abundant  Recyclable  Recycling – 90% recoverable  Extending battery life  Battery management systems  Weight/Volume reductions  Alternative chemistries
  • 41.
    EVs 101 Battery Cost: Learning Curves Source: McKinsey Quarterly: Electrifying Cars: How three industries will evolve
  • 42.
    EVs 101 Initial Cost Companies that sell cars, but lease the batteries  Leases like Power Purchase Agreements  Split operating cost savings with financer  Charging Infrastructure  Charging subscription plans
  • 43.
    EVs 101 2008 FederalPlug-in Electric Drive Vehicle Tax Credit $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 Battery Energy (kWh) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Miles Tax Credit Value Battery Cost (Low) Battery Cost (Mid) Battery Cost (High) Electric Range (Estimate)
  • 44.
    EVs 101 Adoption Rateof EV’s Source: Thomas Becker, UC Berkeley, 2009
  • 45.
    EVs 101 Looking Forward Tipping point will be ~2020 when 10% of vehicles sold will be BEV’s  Battery cost: ~$700-$1,500 / kWh, down to $420 by 2015, but still too high.  Price Premium  PHEV40 $11,800 > ICE  EV100 $24,100 > ICE  Long-term PHEV’s will beat out HEV’s  PHEV’s likely to dominate BEVs  A 30-50% reduction in fuel consumption by 2035 *Heywood  47% reduction by 2030 *McKinsey Source: McKinsey Quarterly: Electrifying Cars: How three industries will evolve ; http://newenergynews.blogspot.com/2009/08/mckinsey-looks-at-coming-ev-phenomenon.html
  • 46.
    EVs 101 EVs NOW Whencan I get one?
  • 47.
  • 48.
    EVs 101 Tesla Roadster Topspeed: 125 mph Acceleration: 0-60 in 3.7 sec Range: 244 mi MSRP: $110,000
  • 49.
    EVs 101 EV’s AvailableSoon Fisker Karma (PHEV50) $87,900 Delivery 2010 Tesla Model S $57,400 Delivery ~2012 2011 Chevy Volt (PHEV40) $40,000
  • 50.
    EVs 101 EV’s AvailableSoon 2010 Mitsubishi I MIEV $24,000 (Japan) 2010 Aptera 2e ~$25,000 (PHEV100) Th!nk City ~$25,000 (europe) 2010 Nissan Leaf $25,000 (30 min charge) And many others…
  • 51.
  • 52.
    EVs 101 MIT ElectricVehicle Team (EVT)  Porsche  elEVen  eMoto  TTXGP
  • 53.
  • 54.
    EVs 101 MIT VehicleDesign Summit  Student team working towards a 100+ mpg vehicle  Series hybrid architecture  Lightweight body and chassis  Life cycle cost analysis and minimization  Shared use model for transportation efficiency  Contact Anna Jaffe, [email protected]
  • 55.
    EVs 101 MIT SolarElectric Vehicle Team  Founded in 1985  Design, build and race solar cars  Just placed 2nd in the 10th World Solar Challenge  mitsolar.com
  • 56.
    EVs 101 MIT VehicleStuff  EVT  SEVT  Vehicle Design Summit  Transportation @ MIT  Sloan Lab Seminars  Media Lab – City Car, course  Spinoffs  A123  Solectria  Genasun
  • 57.
    EVs 101 Thank You “No single technology development or alternative fuel can solve the problems of growing transportation fuel use and GHG emissions.” – John Heywood  Dan Lauber – [email protected] http://mit.edu/evt