EWING’S SARCOMA
PRITHWIRAJ MAITI
FINAL YEAR MBBS
R.G.KAR MEDICAL COLLEGE
5.3.2014
Introduction
• It is the 3rd most common primary malignant
bone tumor.
• Arises from endothelial cells of bone marrow.
• Age: First 2 decades of life.
• Common in males.
• Uncommon in blacks.
• Location affected: Diaphysis of long bone.
• Common bones involved: (in decreasing
order)
1. Femur,
2. Tibia,
3. Fibula,
4. Humerus,
5. Flat bones.
Clinical features
•
•
•
•
•
•

Throbbing, intermittent pain.
Pain worst at night.
Red and warm skin.
Swelling over diaphyseal region.
Generalized illness and pyrexia.
Mimics acute osteomyelitis.
Pathology
• Lobulated large mass over diaphysis of long
bone.
• When hemorrhage occurs, it appears like a red
current jelly.
• Extensive medulary invasion and destruction
of endosteum and cortex.
• Prominent peiosteal new bone formation.
• Sometimes, the tumor is liquefied so as to
resemble a pus.
Histology
•
•
•
•
•
•

Highly cellular.
Little intercellular matrix.
Necrosis is common.
Cells are arranged around the vessels.
PAS +Ve (due to presence of glycogen).
HBA71 +Ve (it is an immunological marker).
Investigations
• Blood:
 Anemia,
 Leucocytosis,
 Raised ESR,
 Raised LDH.
• X-Ray:
 Diaphyseal lesion with irregular destruction (Moth
eaten appearance).
 Periosteal new bone formation (Onion peel
appearance).
 X-Ray chest (to detect metastasis).
• CT Scan:
 Detect the extent of cortical destruction.
 CT scan chest: Detection of metastasis.
• MRI:
 Detection of the degree of intraosseus and
extraosseus extension of tumor.
 Initial staging and surgical planning.
 Assessment of response of the tumor to
chemotherapeutic regimen.
• Bone scan:
Detection of the extent of tumour
involvement.
Detection of the skip lesions in the same
bone.
Detection of distant metastasis.
Course
• Repeated episodes of exacerbation and
remission is characteristic.
• Metastasize by hematogenous and
lymphatogenous routes.
• It obeys the course of bone to bone
metastasis (another one example is
osteosarcoma).
• Common bones where Ewing’s sarcoma
metastasizes are skull, vertebra, rib and lung.
Management of Ewing’s sarcoma
1. Radiotherapy,
2. Surgery,
3. Chemotherapy.
Radiotherapy
• Ewing’s sarcoma is highly radiosensitive
tumour.
• Radiotherapy has dramatic effect on Ewing’s
sarcoma (Melts like snow).
• But recurrence rates are high in case of
radiotherapy alone, survival rates are also not
satisfactory.
Surgery
• Surgery has a very little role in the
management of Ewing sarcoma.
• The available options are:
1. Debulking surgery.
2. Limb preservation surgery.
Systemic Chemotherapy
• It is the mainstay of treatment of Ewing’s
sarcoma.
• Response to chemotherapy is the most
important prognostic factor in this disease.
• Common agents used are: Ifosfamide/
Actinomycin D/ Doxorubicin/ Vincristine etc.
Comment
Best result can be achieved only by
combining all the 3 options available.
Prognostic Factors
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Site: Humerus and pelvis-> Bad prognosis.
Stage: Metastasis-> Bad prognosis.
Tumour size.
Response to chemotherapy.
Male gender.
High LDH level.
Anemia.
c-MIC/ ki-67 gene expression.

Ewing sarcoma

  • 1.
    EWING’S SARCOMA PRITHWIRAJ MAITI FINALYEAR MBBS R.G.KAR MEDICAL COLLEGE 5.3.2014
  • 2.
    Introduction • It isthe 3rd most common primary malignant bone tumor. • Arises from endothelial cells of bone marrow. • Age: First 2 decades of life. • Common in males. • Uncommon in blacks.
  • 3.
    • Location affected:Diaphysis of long bone. • Common bones involved: (in decreasing order) 1. Femur, 2. Tibia, 3. Fibula, 4. Humerus, 5. Flat bones.
  • 4.
    Clinical features • • • • • • Throbbing, intermittentpain. Pain worst at night. Red and warm skin. Swelling over diaphyseal region. Generalized illness and pyrexia. Mimics acute osteomyelitis.
  • 5.
    Pathology • Lobulated largemass over diaphysis of long bone. • When hemorrhage occurs, it appears like a red current jelly. • Extensive medulary invasion and destruction of endosteum and cortex. • Prominent peiosteal new bone formation. • Sometimes, the tumor is liquefied so as to resemble a pus.
  • 6.
    Histology • • • • • • Highly cellular. Little intercellularmatrix. Necrosis is common. Cells are arranged around the vessels. PAS +Ve (due to presence of glycogen). HBA71 +Ve (it is an immunological marker).
  • 8.
    Investigations • Blood:  Anemia, Leucocytosis,  Raised ESR,  Raised LDH. • X-Ray:  Diaphyseal lesion with irregular destruction (Moth eaten appearance).  Periosteal new bone formation (Onion peel appearance).  X-Ray chest (to detect metastasis).
  • 10.
    • CT Scan: Detect the extent of cortical destruction.  CT scan chest: Detection of metastasis. • MRI:  Detection of the degree of intraosseus and extraosseus extension of tumor.  Initial staging and surgical planning.  Assessment of response of the tumor to chemotherapeutic regimen.
  • 11.
    • Bone scan: Detectionof the extent of tumour involvement. Detection of the skip lesions in the same bone. Detection of distant metastasis.
  • 12.
    Course • Repeated episodesof exacerbation and remission is characteristic. • Metastasize by hematogenous and lymphatogenous routes. • It obeys the course of bone to bone metastasis (another one example is osteosarcoma). • Common bones where Ewing’s sarcoma metastasizes are skull, vertebra, rib and lung.
  • 13.
    Management of Ewing’ssarcoma 1. Radiotherapy, 2. Surgery, 3. Chemotherapy.
  • 14.
    Radiotherapy • Ewing’s sarcomais highly radiosensitive tumour. • Radiotherapy has dramatic effect on Ewing’s sarcoma (Melts like snow). • But recurrence rates are high in case of radiotherapy alone, survival rates are also not satisfactory.
  • 15.
    Surgery • Surgery hasa very little role in the management of Ewing sarcoma. • The available options are: 1. Debulking surgery. 2. Limb preservation surgery.
  • 16.
    Systemic Chemotherapy • Itis the mainstay of treatment of Ewing’s sarcoma. • Response to chemotherapy is the most important prognostic factor in this disease. • Common agents used are: Ifosfamide/ Actinomycin D/ Doxorubicin/ Vincristine etc.
  • 17.
    Comment Best result canbe achieved only by combining all the 3 options available.
  • 18.
    Prognostic Factors • • • • • • • • Site: Humerusand pelvis-> Bad prognosis. Stage: Metastasis-> Bad prognosis. Tumour size. Response to chemotherapy. Male gender. High LDH level. Anemia. c-MIC/ ki-67 gene expression.