International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 06 | June -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1844
Experimental study on the properties of PFRC using M-Sand
Manogna R1, Guruprasad T N2
1U G Student, Civil Engineering, Shridevi Institute of Engineering and Technology, Tumakuru, Karnataka, India
2Assistant Professor, Department of civil Engineering, Shridevi Institute of Engineering and Technology,
Tumakuru, Karnataka, India
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - Now days due to high global consumptionof
natural sand, sand deposit is being depleted andcausing
serious threat to environment as well as society. River
sand is becoming a scarce commodity and hence an
exploration alternative to it has become imminent.
Manufactured sand is the good alternative to river sand
and it is purposely made, fine crushed aggregate
produced under controlled conditions from a suitable
sand source rock. Plastics are non-biodegradable
common environmental polluting materials. These are
going to affect the fertility of soil. Design mix of M25
grade concrete withreplacementof0%,20%,40%,60%.
80% and 100% of M-sand have been considered for
laboratory analysis viz. slump test,compressivestrength
for cube and split tensile strength for cylinder, sieve
analysis and specific gravity tests for both fine and
coarse aggregates and M-Sand and results were
compared with standards to achieve the desired
parameter.
Key Words: M-Sand, Polypropylene fibers,
Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Concrete (PFRC),
Compressive strength, Split Tensile Strength.
1. INTRODUCTION
Concrete is the second most consumedmaterial intheworld.
The versatility and mould ability of this material, its high
compressive strength, and the discovery of the reinforcing
and pre-stressing techniques which help to make up for its
low tensile strength have contribute largely to its
widespread use. Fiber ReinforcedConcretecanbedefined as
a composite material consisting of mixtures of cement,
mortar or concrete and discontinuous, discrete, uniformly
dispersed suitable fibers. Continuous meshes,wovenfabrics
and long wires or rods are not considered to be discrete
fibers. Fiber is a small piece of reinforcing material
possessing certain characteristics properties. Concrete is
composite material having properties of high compressive
strength, low tensile strength, low post cracking capacity,
brittleness and low impact strength. These properties can
be improved by addition of fibre in the concrete.
Polypropylene Fibre Reinforced Concrete is an embryonic
construction material which can be described as a concrete
having high mechanical strength, Stiffnessanddurability.By
utilization of Polypropylene fibres in concrete not only
optimum utilization of materials isachievedbutalsothecost
reduction is achieved. Concrete modification by using
polymeric materials has been studied for the past four
decades. In general, the reinforcement of brittle building
materials with fibres has been known from ancient period
such as putting straw into the mud for housing walls or
reinforcing mortar using animal hairetc.Manymaterialslike
jute, bamboo, coconut, rice husk, cane bagasse, and sawdust
as well as synthetic materials such as polyvinyl alcohol,
polypropylene (PP), polyethylene, polyamides etc.havealso
been used for reinforcing the concrete. Research and
development into new fibre reinforced concrete is going on
today as well. The uses of plastic fibres in the concrete are
going to improve the mechanical properties of concrete.
M.Shanmugaraja has been observed that the authors have
carried out experiments to study only the mechanical
properties of concreteforvariouspercentagereplacementof
fine aggregates by manufactured sands. The percentage of
increase in the compressive strength is noticed and the
flexure strength is increased at the age of 28 days by
replacing 50% of natural sand with M-Sand. A. P. Sathe
effect of polypropylene (PP) fibres on various properties of
concrete such as compressive strength, tensile strength,
workability, and fracture properties with various content of
fibre (0% ,0.5%,1.0%,1.5%). The result of this present
investigation indicates that by adding of 0.5% of
polypropylene fibre shows maximum compressive and
tensile strength.
1.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
 to study the properties of fibre reinforced concrete
when fine aggregate is replaced by manufactured
sand and with the addition of plastic fibres i.e.
polypropylene fibres.
 To Give an alternative way to reinforce concrete
other than traditional steel rebar.
 To determine the change in compressive strength
and tensile strength when river sand is replaced in
percentages with M-sand and polypropylene fibers.
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 06 | June -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1845
2. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY
2.1 Cement
In this study, Portland pozzolana cement (PPC) is a kind of
blended cement which is produced by either inter grinding
of OPC clinker along with gypsum and pozzolanic materials.
PPC confirm to IS: 1489:1991-part-1. The cement used was
fresh and without lumps. Advantages of PPC: Low heat of
hydration, Reduction in water demand, Reduced bleeding
due to high fineness of cement and Resistance to chloride
attack. All the mixes in the present work will be prepared
using PPC of UltraTech cements. Since UltraTech Cement
(PPC) makes concrete more impermeable, denser as
compared to OPC. The specific gravity of cement was found
to be 3.14.
2.2 Fine Aggregates (River Sand)
The fine aggregate used throughout the experimental
investigation is from single source. Fine aggregates passing
4.75mm is considered Sieve analysis of fine aggregate is
performed to determine the particle size distribution of fine
aggregate as per IS: 383-1970, it belong to zone II. The
specific gravity was found to be 2.7.
2.3 Coarse Aggregates
The coarse aggregate which is used throughout the
experimental investigation arenaturallyirregularand partly
rounded (angular) at the edge having 10-20 mm size of
aggregate. Also coarse aggregate having size 20 mm is
considered for the study (i.e. 20mm down). Sieveanalysis of
coarse aggregate is performed on both the samples to
determine the particle size distribution of coarse aggregate.
As per IS: 383-1970 grading of coarse aggregates were
confirmed as well graded aggregate for both sample. The
specific gravity of coarse aggregates was found to be 2.68.
2.4 M-Sand
Manufactured sand is a substitute of river sand for
construction purposes. It is produced from hard granite
stone by crushing. The crushed sand is of cubical shape with
grounded edges, washed and graded to as a construction
material. Sieve analysis of M-sand is carried out and it
belongs to zone II. The specific gravity of M-Sand is found to
be 2.72.
2.5 Polypropylene Fibers
Polypropylene is one of the cheapest & abundantlyavailable
polymers polypropylene fibers are resistant to most
chemical & it would be cementitious matrix which would
deteriorate first under aggressive chemical attack. Its
e i g i i high C). Polypropylene short fibers in
small volume fractionsbetween0.5to1.5commerciallyused
in concrete.
2.6 Water
Water fit for drinking is generally considered fit for making
concrete. The water should be free from acids, oils, alkalis,
vegetables or other organic impurities. Soft water also
produces weaker concrete. Water has two functions in a
concrete mix. Firstly, it reacts chemically with the cement to
form a cement paste in which the inertaggregatesareheld in
suspension until the cement paste hashardened.Secondly,it
serves as a vehicle or lubricant in the mixture as fine
aggregates and cement. Portable water is used for both
mixing concrete and also for curing.
2.7 Mix Design
The mix was designed as per IS 10262:2009 for M25 grade
concrete with 0.5 water cement ratio. Concrete mixes are
prepared by partial replacement of natural sand by
manufactured sand with different percentages (0%, 20%,
40%, 60%, 80%, 100%) respectively and adding fixed
percentage of plastic fibres (0.5% of weight of cement) for
every mix.
2.8 Test specimen
Cement, sand and aggregate were taken in mix proportion
1:1.83:2.96 which correspond to M25 grade of concrete
respectively. The 150mmX150mmX150mm size concrete
cubes, cylinder of size 100mm diameter and 200mm height
were used as test specimens to determine the compressive
strength, split tensile strength.
2.9 Test procedure
The cubes and cylinders are casted and cured for 7-daysand
28-days to achieve the desired strength. Cubes are tested
under compressiveloadsusingcompressiontestingmachine
(CTM) and cylinders are subjected to tensile load i.e; load
perpendicular to the axis line using CTM. Thus compressive
strength and split tensile strength are tested.
3. Results and Discussion
The compressive strength results of different mixes are
given by fig1. It has been observed that, the compressive
strength of concrete at 7-days produced with M-Sand and
polypropylene fibers goes on increasing up to 100%m-sand
and 0.5% PP Fiber. Thus it can be concluded that, the
optimum compressive strength gained after 7-days curing
period is at 100% M-Sand replacement and 0.5% PPFiber.It
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 06 | June -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1846
has been observed that, the compressive strength of
concrete at 28-days produced with M-Sand and
polypropylene fibers goes on increasing up to 100%m-sand
and 0.5% PP Fiber. Thus it can be concluded that, the
optimum compressive strength gained after 28-days curing
period is at 100% M-Sand replacement and 0.5% PP Fiber.
The optimum strength gained after 7-days and 28-days
curing period is at 100% m-sand replacement to fine
aggregates. It has been observed that, the split tensile
strength of concrete at 28-days produced with M-Sand and
polypropylene fibers goes on increasing up to 100%m-sand
and 0.5% PP Fiber. Thus it can be concluded that, the
optimum compressive strength gained after 28-days curing
period is at 100% M-Sand replacement and 0.5% PP Fiber.
16.22 16.8 17.28 18.05 18.41 19.57
0
5
10
15
20
25
0% M-
sand
20% M-
sand
40% M-
sand
60% M-
sand
80% M-
sand
100% M
sand
Chart 1: 7-days compressive strength
25.01
25.46
25.73
26.22
27.36
28.25
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
0% M- 20% M- 40% M- 60% M- 80% M- 100% M
Chart 2: 28-days compressive strength
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0% M-sand
+ 0.5% PP
Fibre
20% M-
sand +
0.5% PP
40% M-
sand +
0.5% PP
60% M-
sand +
0.5% PP
80% M-
sand +
0.5% PP
100% M-
Sand +
0.5% PP
Chart 3: Comparison between 7-days and 28- days strength
2.5 2.54
2.89 2.95
3.26 3.52
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0% M-sand
+ 0.5% PP
Fibre
20% M-
sand +
0.5% PP
Fibre
40% M-
sand +
0.5% PP
Fibre
60% M-
sand +
0.5% PP
Fibre
80% M-
sand +
0.5% PP
Fibre
100% M-
Sand +
0.5% PP
FibreChart 4: 28-days split tensile strength
4. CONCLUSIONS
Manufactured sand is the good alternative to river sand and
it is purposely made, fine crushedaggregateproducedunder
controlled conditions from a suitable sand source rock.
Plastics are non-bio-degradable common environmental
polluting materials. These are going to affect the fertility of
soil. In our study thedetailed experimental investigationwas
carried out on plastic fiber reinforced concrete by partial
replacement of natural sand by manufactured sand with
different percentages (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%,80%,100%)and
adding fixed percentage (0.5% of weight cement) of plastic
fibers (PP fibers). The mechanical propertiesofconcretelike
compressive strength and tensile strength were studied.
Based on the test results, following conclusions are drawn:
1) Concrete produced by replacing natural sand by
manufactured sand with addition of 0.5% of plastic
fibres imparts higher compressive and split tensile
strengths due to sharp edges andbetterinterlockingof
M-sand particles and good bonding with other
materials.
2) The compressive strength of 100% replaced
manufactured sand concrete with 0.5% of plastic
fibres is 12.95% more than reference mix (0%
replaced mix).
3) The split tensile strength of 100% replaced
manufactured sand concrete is 15.02% more than the
split tensile strength of reference mix.
4) By the inclusion of PP fibres into the concrete, certain
amount of ductile nature is induced in the concrete
which can be seen through the split tensile strength
test carried out.
5) The results of this experimental work establishes that
river sand can be completely replaced with
manufactured sand and with the addition of plastic
fibers does not have any adverse impact on the
mechanical characteristics of the concrete.
6) The mode of failure was changed from brittle to
ductile failure due to inclusion of plastic fibresintothe
concrete.
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 06 | June -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1847
REFERENCES
[1] Ma ju a ha M., “Durabi i y S udie C cre e by
Replacing Natural Sand with M-Sand – A Review”,
International Journal of Emerging Technology and
Advanced Engineering, Issue 3, Volume 6, March 2016.
[2] Saadu , “Behavi ur f y r y e e fibre rei f rced
co cre e u der dy a ic i ac ad”, J ur a f
Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 11, 2016.
[3] M.Sha ugaraja, “S re g h a d Durabi i y f Fibre
Rei f rced Quarry Du C cre e”,I er a i a J ur a
of Innovations in Engineering and Technology (IJIET),
Issue 2, Volume 6, December 2015
[4] Ravi Ku ar a d Ma ju a h, “I ve iga i Wa e
Plastic Fibre Reinforced Concrete Using Manufactured
Sa d a Fi e Aggrega e”, I er a i a Re earchJ ur a
of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Issue: 04,
Volume: 02, July-2015.
[5] Mi i d V. M h d, “Perf r a ce f P y r y e e Fibre
Rei f rced C cre e”, IOSR J ur a f Mecha ica a d
Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), Issue 1, Volume 12, Jan-
Feb. 2015.
[6] Dr.T.Ch. Madhavi, “P y r y e e Fibre Rei f rced
Concrete- A Review”, International Journal of Emerging
Technology and Advanced Engineering, Issue 4,Volume
4, June 2014.
[7] R. N. Nibudey, “S re g h Predic i f P a ic fibre
Rei f rced c cre e M30)”, I er a i a J ur a f
Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA),Issue1,
Vol. 3, January -February 2013.
[8] A. P. Sa he, “Ex eri e a I ve iga i
Polypropylene Fibre Reinforced Concrete withArtificial
[9] a d”, I er a i a J ur a f Scie ce a d Re earch
(IJSR), 2013.
[10] Saeed Ah ed, “A udy r er ie f y r y ene
fibre rei f rced c cre e”, 3 C fere ce OUR
WORLD IN CONCRETE & STRUCTURES, August 2006.
[11] “C cre e Tech gy” -Theory and Practice, M.S.
Shetty, S. Chand and Company, New Delhi, 2002.
[12] “Pr er ie f C cre e” Nevi e, A.M., ELBS, L d .
[13] “C cre e ech gy” -A.R. Santakumar.Oxford
University press (2007).
[14] “C cre e Mix de ig ” - N. Krishna Raju, Sehgal-
publishers.
[15] “C cre e Ma ua ” – Gambhir Dhanpat Rai & Sons, New
Delhi.
[16] IS: 10262-2009, Indian Standard Concrete mix
proportioning – guideline, Bureau of India standard
(BIS), New Delhi, India.
[17] IS: 456-2000 fourth revision Code of practice for plain
and reinforced concrete.
Percentage
replacement of
natural sand by
manufactured sand
Compressive
strength (MPa)
Percentage
increase of
compressive
strength w.r.t ref.
mix
Split tensile
strength
(MPa)
Percentage
increase of
tensile strength
w.r.t ref. mix
0% M-sand + 0.5%
PP Fiber (Ref. Mix.)
25.01 0 2.53 0
20% M-sand + 0.5%
PP Fiber
25.46 1.8 2.6 2.77
40% M-sand + 0.5%
PP Fiber
25.73 2.86 2.71 7.0
60% M-sand + 0.5%
PP Fiber
26.22 4.76 2.8 10.32
80% M-sand + 0.5%
PP Fiber
27.36 9.11 2.89 13.53
100% M-Sand + 0.5%
PP Fiber
28.25 12.95 2.91 15.02

Experimental Study on the Properties of PFRC using M-Sand

  • 1.
    International Research Journalof Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 06 | June -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1844 Experimental study on the properties of PFRC using M-Sand Manogna R1, Guruprasad T N2 1U G Student, Civil Engineering, Shridevi Institute of Engineering and Technology, Tumakuru, Karnataka, India 2Assistant Professor, Department of civil Engineering, Shridevi Institute of Engineering and Technology, Tumakuru, Karnataka, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - Now days due to high global consumptionof natural sand, sand deposit is being depleted andcausing serious threat to environment as well as society. River sand is becoming a scarce commodity and hence an exploration alternative to it has become imminent. Manufactured sand is the good alternative to river sand and it is purposely made, fine crushed aggregate produced under controlled conditions from a suitable sand source rock. Plastics are non-biodegradable common environmental polluting materials. These are going to affect the fertility of soil. Design mix of M25 grade concrete withreplacementof0%,20%,40%,60%. 80% and 100% of M-sand have been considered for laboratory analysis viz. slump test,compressivestrength for cube and split tensile strength for cylinder, sieve analysis and specific gravity tests for both fine and coarse aggregates and M-Sand and results were compared with standards to achieve the desired parameter. Key Words: M-Sand, Polypropylene fibers, Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Concrete (PFRC), Compressive strength, Split Tensile Strength. 1. INTRODUCTION Concrete is the second most consumedmaterial intheworld. The versatility and mould ability of this material, its high compressive strength, and the discovery of the reinforcing and pre-stressing techniques which help to make up for its low tensile strength have contribute largely to its widespread use. Fiber ReinforcedConcretecanbedefined as a composite material consisting of mixtures of cement, mortar or concrete and discontinuous, discrete, uniformly dispersed suitable fibers. Continuous meshes,wovenfabrics and long wires or rods are not considered to be discrete fibers. Fiber is a small piece of reinforcing material possessing certain characteristics properties. Concrete is composite material having properties of high compressive strength, low tensile strength, low post cracking capacity, brittleness and low impact strength. These properties can be improved by addition of fibre in the concrete. Polypropylene Fibre Reinforced Concrete is an embryonic construction material which can be described as a concrete having high mechanical strength, Stiffnessanddurability.By utilization of Polypropylene fibres in concrete not only optimum utilization of materials isachievedbutalsothecost reduction is achieved. Concrete modification by using polymeric materials has been studied for the past four decades. In general, the reinforcement of brittle building materials with fibres has been known from ancient period such as putting straw into the mud for housing walls or reinforcing mortar using animal hairetc.Manymaterialslike jute, bamboo, coconut, rice husk, cane bagasse, and sawdust as well as synthetic materials such as polyvinyl alcohol, polypropylene (PP), polyethylene, polyamides etc.havealso been used for reinforcing the concrete. Research and development into new fibre reinforced concrete is going on today as well. The uses of plastic fibres in the concrete are going to improve the mechanical properties of concrete. M.Shanmugaraja has been observed that the authors have carried out experiments to study only the mechanical properties of concreteforvariouspercentagereplacementof fine aggregates by manufactured sands. The percentage of increase in the compressive strength is noticed and the flexure strength is increased at the age of 28 days by replacing 50% of natural sand with M-Sand. A. P. Sathe effect of polypropylene (PP) fibres on various properties of concrete such as compressive strength, tensile strength, workability, and fracture properties with various content of fibre (0% ,0.5%,1.0%,1.5%). The result of this present investigation indicates that by adding of 0.5% of polypropylene fibre shows maximum compressive and tensile strength. 1.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY  to study the properties of fibre reinforced concrete when fine aggregate is replaced by manufactured sand and with the addition of plastic fibres i.e. polypropylene fibres.  To Give an alternative way to reinforce concrete other than traditional steel rebar.  To determine the change in compressive strength and tensile strength when river sand is replaced in percentages with M-sand and polypropylene fibers.
  • 2.
    International Research Journalof Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 06 | June -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1845 2. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY 2.1 Cement In this study, Portland pozzolana cement (PPC) is a kind of blended cement which is produced by either inter grinding of OPC clinker along with gypsum and pozzolanic materials. PPC confirm to IS: 1489:1991-part-1. The cement used was fresh and without lumps. Advantages of PPC: Low heat of hydration, Reduction in water demand, Reduced bleeding due to high fineness of cement and Resistance to chloride attack. All the mixes in the present work will be prepared using PPC of UltraTech cements. Since UltraTech Cement (PPC) makes concrete more impermeable, denser as compared to OPC. The specific gravity of cement was found to be 3.14. 2.2 Fine Aggregates (River Sand) The fine aggregate used throughout the experimental investigation is from single source. Fine aggregates passing 4.75mm is considered Sieve analysis of fine aggregate is performed to determine the particle size distribution of fine aggregate as per IS: 383-1970, it belong to zone II. The specific gravity was found to be 2.7. 2.3 Coarse Aggregates The coarse aggregate which is used throughout the experimental investigation arenaturallyirregularand partly rounded (angular) at the edge having 10-20 mm size of aggregate. Also coarse aggregate having size 20 mm is considered for the study (i.e. 20mm down). Sieveanalysis of coarse aggregate is performed on both the samples to determine the particle size distribution of coarse aggregate. As per IS: 383-1970 grading of coarse aggregates were confirmed as well graded aggregate for both sample. The specific gravity of coarse aggregates was found to be 2.68. 2.4 M-Sand Manufactured sand is a substitute of river sand for construction purposes. It is produced from hard granite stone by crushing. The crushed sand is of cubical shape with grounded edges, washed and graded to as a construction material. Sieve analysis of M-sand is carried out and it belongs to zone II. The specific gravity of M-Sand is found to be 2.72. 2.5 Polypropylene Fibers Polypropylene is one of the cheapest & abundantlyavailable polymers polypropylene fibers are resistant to most chemical & it would be cementitious matrix which would deteriorate first under aggressive chemical attack. Its e i g i i high C). Polypropylene short fibers in small volume fractionsbetween0.5to1.5commerciallyused in concrete. 2.6 Water Water fit for drinking is generally considered fit for making concrete. The water should be free from acids, oils, alkalis, vegetables or other organic impurities. Soft water also produces weaker concrete. Water has two functions in a concrete mix. Firstly, it reacts chemically with the cement to form a cement paste in which the inertaggregatesareheld in suspension until the cement paste hashardened.Secondly,it serves as a vehicle or lubricant in the mixture as fine aggregates and cement. Portable water is used for both mixing concrete and also for curing. 2.7 Mix Design The mix was designed as per IS 10262:2009 for M25 grade concrete with 0.5 water cement ratio. Concrete mixes are prepared by partial replacement of natural sand by manufactured sand with different percentages (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 100%) respectively and adding fixed percentage of plastic fibres (0.5% of weight of cement) for every mix. 2.8 Test specimen Cement, sand and aggregate were taken in mix proportion 1:1.83:2.96 which correspond to M25 grade of concrete respectively. The 150mmX150mmX150mm size concrete cubes, cylinder of size 100mm diameter and 200mm height were used as test specimens to determine the compressive strength, split tensile strength. 2.9 Test procedure The cubes and cylinders are casted and cured for 7-daysand 28-days to achieve the desired strength. Cubes are tested under compressiveloadsusingcompressiontestingmachine (CTM) and cylinders are subjected to tensile load i.e; load perpendicular to the axis line using CTM. Thus compressive strength and split tensile strength are tested. 3. Results and Discussion The compressive strength results of different mixes are given by fig1. It has been observed that, the compressive strength of concrete at 7-days produced with M-Sand and polypropylene fibers goes on increasing up to 100%m-sand and 0.5% PP Fiber. Thus it can be concluded that, the optimum compressive strength gained after 7-days curing period is at 100% M-Sand replacement and 0.5% PPFiber.It
  • 3.
    International Research Journalof Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 06 | June -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1846 has been observed that, the compressive strength of concrete at 28-days produced with M-Sand and polypropylene fibers goes on increasing up to 100%m-sand and 0.5% PP Fiber. Thus it can be concluded that, the optimum compressive strength gained after 28-days curing period is at 100% M-Sand replacement and 0.5% PP Fiber. The optimum strength gained after 7-days and 28-days curing period is at 100% m-sand replacement to fine aggregates. It has been observed that, the split tensile strength of concrete at 28-days produced with M-Sand and polypropylene fibers goes on increasing up to 100%m-sand and 0.5% PP Fiber. Thus it can be concluded that, the optimum compressive strength gained after 28-days curing period is at 100% M-Sand replacement and 0.5% PP Fiber. 16.22 16.8 17.28 18.05 18.41 19.57 0 5 10 15 20 25 0% M- sand 20% M- sand 40% M- sand 60% M- sand 80% M- sand 100% M sand Chart 1: 7-days compressive strength 25.01 25.46 25.73 26.22 27.36 28.25 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 0% M- 20% M- 40% M- 60% M- 80% M- 100% M Chart 2: 28-days compressive strength 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0% M-sand + 0.5% PP Fibre 20% M- sand + 0.5% PP 40% M- sand + 0.5% PP 60% M- sand + 0.5% PP 80% M- sand + 0.5% PP 100% M- Sand + 0.5% PP Chart 3: Comparison between 7-days and 28- days strength 2.5 2.54 2.89 2.95 3.26 3.52 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0% M-sand + 0.5% PP Fibre 20% M- sand + 0.5% PP Fibre 40% M- sand + 0.5% PP Fibre 60% M- sand + 0.5% PP Fibre 80% M- sand + 0.5% PP Fibre 100% M- Sand + 0.5% PP FibreChart 4: 28-days split tensile strength 4. CONCLUSIONS Manufactured sand is the good alternative to river sand and it is purposely made, fine crushedaggregateproducedunder controlled conditions from a suitable sand source rock. Plastics are non-bio-degradable common environmental polluting materials. These are going to affect the fertility of soil. In our study thedetailed experimental investigationwas carried out on plastic fiber reinforced concrete by partial replacement of natural sand by manufactured sand with different percentages (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%,80%,100%)and adding fixed percentage (0.5% of weight cement) of plastic fibers (PP fibers). The mechanical propertiesofconcretelike compressive strength and tensile strength were studied. Based on the test results, following conclusions are drawn: 1) Concrete produced by replacing natural sand by manufactured sand with addition of 0.5% of plastic fibres imparts higher compressive and split tensile strengths due to sharp edges andbetterinterlockingof M-sand particles and good bonding with other materials. 2) The compressive strength of 100% replaced manufactured sand concrete with 0.5% of plastic fibres is 12.95% more than reference mix (0% replaced mix). 3) The split tensile strength of 100% replaced manufactured sand concrete is 15.02% more than the split tensile strength of reference mix. 4) By the inclusion of PP fibres into the concrete, certain amount of ductile nature is induced in the concrete which can be seen through the split tensile strength test carried out. 5) The results of this experimental work establishes that river sand can be completely replaced with manufactured sand and with the addition of plastic fibers does not have any adverse impact on the mechanical characteristics of the concrete. 6) The mode of failure was changed from brittle to ductile failure due to inclusion of plastic fibresintothe concrete.
  • 4.
    International Research Journalof Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 06 | June -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1847 REFERENCES [1] Ma ju a ha M., “Durabi i y S udie C cre e by Replacing Natural Sand with M-Sand – A Review”, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, Issue 3, Volume 6, March 2016. [2] Saadu , “Behavi ur f y r y e e fibre rei f rced co cre e u der dy a ic i ac ad”, J ur a f Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 11, 2016. [3] M.Sha ugaraja, “S re g h a d Durabi i y f Fibre Rei f rced Quarry Du C cre e”,I er a i a J ur a of Innovations in Engineering and Technology (IJIET), Issue 2, Volume 6, December 2015 [4] Ravi Ku ar a d Ma ju a h, “I ve iga i Wa e Plastic Fibre Reinforced Concrete Using Manufactured Sa d a Fi e Aggrega e”, I er a i a Re earchJ ur a of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Issue: 04, Volume: 02, July-2015. [5] Mi i d V. M h d, “Perf r a ce f P y r y e e Fibre Rei f rced C cre e”, IOSR J ur a f Mecha ica a d Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), Issue 1, Volume 12, Jan- Feb. 2015. [6] Dr.T.Ch. Madhavi, “P y r y e e Fibre Rei f rced Concrete- A Review”, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, Issue 4,Volume 4, June 2014. [7] R. N. Nibudey, “S re g h Predic i f P a ic fibre Rei f rced c cre e M30)”, I er a i a J ur a f Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA),Issue1, Vol. 3, January -February 2013. [8] A. P. Sa he, “Ex eri e a I ve iga i Polypropylene Fibre Reinforced Concrete withArtificial [9] a d”, I er a i a J ur a f Scie ce a d Re earch (IJSR), 2013. [10] Saeed Ah ed, “A udy r er ie f y r y ene fibre rei f rced c cre e”, 3 C fere ce OUR WORLD IN CONCRETE & STRUCTURES, August 2006. [11] “C cre e Tech gy” -Theory and Practice, M.S. Shetty, S. Chand and Company, New Delhi, 2002. [12] “Pr er ie f C cre e” Nevi e, A.M., ELBS, L d . [13] “C cre e ech gy” -A.R. Santakumar.Oxford University press (2007). [14] “C cre e Mix de ig ” - N. Krishna Raju, Sehgal- publishers. [15] “C cre e Ma ua ” – Gambhir Dhanpat Rai & Sons, New Delhi. [16] IS: 10262-2009, Indian Standard Concrete mix proportioning – guideline, Bureau of India standard (BIS), New Delhi, India. [17] IS: 456-2000 fourth revision Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete. Percentage replacement of natural sand by manufactured sand Compressive strength (MPa) Percentage increase of compressive strength w.r.t ref. mix Split tensile strength (MPa) Percentage increase of tensile strength w.r.t ref. mix 0% M-sand + 0.5% PP Fiber (Ref. Mix.) 25.01 0 2.53 0 20% M-sand + 0.5% PP Fiber 25.46 1.8 2.6 2.77 40% M-sand + 0.5% PP Fiber 25.73 2.86 2.71 7.0 60% M-sand + 0.5% PP Fiber 26.22 4.76 2.8 10.32 80% M-sand + 0.5% PP Fiber 27.36 9.11 2.89 13.53 100% M-Sand + 0.5% PP Fiber 28.25 12.95 2.91 15.02