Expert workshop on the measurement of public procurement of innovation 4th feb oecd

Expert workshop on the measurement of public procurement of innovation 4th feb oecd

• 1.
  Expert Workshop onthe Measurement of Public Procurement of Innovation “What are the user interests behind requests for data and indicators on PPI? Can these requirements be clearly identified and delivered? ” Laura Hernández Garvayo – Metrics Department February 4th, 2013 OECD, Paris ‹Nº›
• 2.
  TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. USER INTERESTS FOR DATA AND INDICATORS 2. PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE IN MEASURING INNOVATIVE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: THE E2I 2010 ACTION PLAN 2.1 TEMPLATE FOR PROCUREMENT OF GOODS AND SERVICES DATA 3. PROPOSED METHODOLOGY FOR AN INNOVATIVE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SCOREBOARD 4. NEXT STEPS ‹Nº›
• 3.
  ICONO is FECYT'sObservatory of R&I Indicators • provides objective data about R&I indicators and their evolution • analyses science, technology and innovation policies and strategies. • publishes reports regarding R&I For whom? Public administration R&D Research agents S&T Private industry Media and Press Society The aim of ICONO is to be a reference from the point of view of the measurement of science and innovation The observatory is on the scene of any relevant activity related to science, technology and innovation indicators: 1) national and international forums: European Commission, OECD, RICYT 2) agreements with institutions: INE, Cotec, SCImago, IVIE-ÁBACO 3) workshops, events and conferences ‹Nº›
• 4.
  1. User interestsfor data and indicators WHY • “In God we trust, all others must bring data” Edwards Deming WHAT • Public Understanding of Science Survey, Fecyt 2012 HOW • Budget, Programmes and Staff • Job creation, firms, products and services ‹Nº›
• 5.
  Over 80% ofSpanish think public investment in science and innovation should Public Understanding of Science Survey, Fecyt 2012 Near 60% of the population think firms do not invest enough in science and increase. innovation Yes 81,6% 21,5% No 59,4% 82,8% NC 1,0% 82,3% Doesn t know 18,1% 80,9% Q13. Should public administration invest in science and innovation? Q.15. Do firms invest enough in Science and innovaton? ‹Nº› 5
• 6.
  2. Previous experiencein measuring IPP: the e2i 2010 Action Plan • Monitoring the National Innovation Strategy (e2i): FECYT developed a data collection methodology targeted for all ministerial actions within the scope of the 2010 Action Plan. • In order to meet the established objectives, FECYT carried out the following actions: 1. Identification of public authorities responsible of the innovation Strategy Action Plan 2010. 2. Drafting two templates for data collection: o calls for tenders o procurement of goods and services. The actions of the e2i 2010 Action Plan collected using the template for procurement of goods and services can be understood as a first approach to an Innovative Public Procurement Scoreboard. ‹Nº›
• 7.
  2.1 Template forprocurement of goods and services data Performance Indicators Impact Indicators Number of beneficiary Jobs Approved Executed Total of companies Companies Axis Action Name Number of Number of budget budget beneficiary Total of Number of Chapter tenders allocations beneficiary Other (total) (total) entities beneficiary R&D&i companies SME activities companies involved Policies for Technology and Innovation Strategy for Defence 6 135.378,38 137.961,24 237 71 347 170 40 676 2.387 210 innovation in Defence Technology and Innovation Strategy for Defence 6 54.477,76 52.571,38 3.109 162 154 64 53 125 13 Incorporation of innovation in internationalisation support policy – Support to the internationalisation of innovative 6 1.117,00 860,50 79 30 30 30 30 companies. Support Plan for Business Projects involving International Innovation Dissemination. Incorporation of innovation in internationalisation support policy – Support to the internationalisation of innovative 6 407,00 313,00 12 11 11 11 11 companies. Support Plan for Business Projects involving Design Internationalisation Measures for the Incorporation of innovation in internationalisation support international policy – Internationalisation plan for the Biotechnology 6 116,00 90,00 1 1 19 18 18 development of sector. global innovative Incorporation of internationalisation support policy – companies international support policy for innovative companies. 6 137,00 106,00 1 1 1 Internationalisation Plan for the Nanotechnology sector Incorporation of innovation in internationalisation support policy – Support to the internationalisation of innovative 6 244,00 188,00 1 1 21 20 20 companies. Internationalisation Plan for Technological Centres Incorporation of innovation in internationalisation support policy – Support to the internationalisation of innovative 6 103,00 80,00 1 1 25 24 24 companies. Internationalisation Plan for the Design sector continues ‹Nº›
• 8.
  2.1 Template forprocurement of goods and services data Performance Indicators Impact Indicators Number of beneficiary Jobs Companies Axis Action Name Approved Executed Total of companies Number of Number of budget budget beneficiary Total of Number of Chapter tenders allocations (total) (total) entities beneficiary beneficiary R&D&i Other companies SME activities companies involved Web page of Spanish cultures 6 4.776,60 4.776,60 1 1 11 26 11 Development of Database digitalisation of the Ministry of Culture 6 138,00 3 1 1 1 5 1 i-Government Strategic Plan for the Modernisation of the Justice Sector 6 573.216,01 573.216,01 20 20 20 900 20 Innovation projects for State Security Forces 6 4.500,00 4.500,00 6 2.820,00 1.095,00 Development of Meteorological Support Services for Air Navigation 2 2.980,00 2.948,00 28 6 6 6 6 the Green Economy Regionalised Climate Scenarios 6 63,80 63,80 1 1 1 1 2 1 Policy for Rural Affairs Innovation rd Development of MetOp European satellite programme 3 mission (MTG) 7 1.226,00 1.226,00 the Science 2 165,00 92,00 Industry Air Quality Plan 6 3 3 3 3 6 1.794,00 1.410,00 Local Innovation State Fund for Employment and Sustainability 7 916.739,77 916.739,77 7.650 7.644 4.962 4.962 62.779 4.962 Support Plan Health Information System of the National Health System 6 3.000,00 3.000,00 30 Development of Clinical information interoperability 6 2.000,00 1.677,50 15 Health and Social Care Economy INGESA Actions 6 639,00 639,00 26 15 15 15 6 12 National Health System Organ Donation and Transplant 6 220,48 220,48 TOTAL 1.706.258,8 1.703.774,28 11.156 7.969 665 5.345 5.158 1.714 65.249 5.227 SCOPE 15 Ministries and their managerial departments 133 programs and actions 15 responsible delegates Data collection by collaboration ‹Nº›
• 9.
  3. Proposed InnovativePublic Procurement Scoreboard • An innovative public procurement scoreboard: input and output indicators (ongoing) -this data is being collected from State Procurement Platform • Indicators and sources for the scoreboard INPUT OUTPUT 1.Total and percentage of Public Administrations 1. Total number of firms dedicated to IPP Expenditure on IPP: 1.1. National (and regional) level 2. Number of products/services resulting from IPP. 1.2. Ministries and their managerial departments 3. Turnover due to IPP of companies with IPP contracts. 2. Programmes financing IPP: 2.1. Number of programmes 4. Number of new created positions linked to IPP. 2.2. Amount financed by each programme 5. Number of patents linked to IPP. 3. Total number of IPP dedicated Personnel: 3.1. Public sector 6. Number of scientific publications linked to IPP 3.2. Private sector Source: State Procurement Platform and Template ( ‹Nº›
• 10.
  4. Nexts Steps •Drafting a template for public authorities bidders responsible of Innovative Public Procurement contracts. It implies identification of: o ministries and their managerial departments, o programs and actions o responsible delegates • Defining procedure for validation of main indicators (state procurement platform) ‹Nº›
• 11.
  On the web: www.icono.fecyt.es Follow Fecyt on Facebook and Twitter: Follow Icono on Twitter www.facebook.com/fecyt.ciencia @ICONO_FECYT @FECYT_Ciencia ICONO, Spanish Research and Innovation Observatory:[email protected] Email: Laura Hernández Garvayo: [email protected] Thank you! ‹Nº›