Financial Education Roundtable
European Money Week – March 9, 2015
Annamaria Lusardi
The George Washington School of Business
Academic Director, Global Financial Literacy Excellence Center (GFLEC)
Financial Literacy and Economic Outcomes:
Evidence and Policy Implications
The growing importance of financial literacy
Major changes that increase individuals’ responsibility for
their financial well-being
 Changes in the pension landscape
• More individual accounts and private pensions
 Changes in labor markets
• Divergence in wages – skills are critical
 Changes in financial markets
• Greater complexity
• More opportunities to borrow & in large amounts
A new economic landscape
Increase in individual responsibility
 Individuals make many financial decisions
• Investment in education
• Financial security after retirement
• Investing in financial markets & other markets
(buying a home, car, etc.)
 Not enough to look at asset side; liability
side is equally important
• Increase in household debt
• Debt normally incurs higher interest rates than
what is earned on assets
 Financial decisions are complex
• Many more financial products than in the past
More complex financial decisions
A large amount of research in past 15 years
1. How well-equipped are people to make financial
decisions?
2. Are there vulnerable groups?
3. Does financial literacy matter?
4. What can be done to promote financial literacy and
financial decision-making?
Some questions
Measuring financial literacy
1. “Suppose you had $100 in a savings
account and the interest rate was 2% per
year. After 5 years, how much do you think
you would have in the account if you left the
money to grow?”
2. “Imagine that the interest rate on your
savings account was 1% per year and
inflation was 2% per year. After 1 year, with
the money in this account, would you be
able to buy…”
3. “Do you think the following statement is true
or false? Buying a single company stock
usually provides a safer return than a stock
mutual fund.”
 More than $102
 Exactly $102
 Less than $102
 Don’t know
 Refuse to answer
 More than today
 Exactly the same as today
 Less than today
 Don`t know
 Refuse to answer
 True
 False
 Don`t know
 Refuse to answer
Financial Literacy around the World
(FLat World)
Evidence from 13 countries:
 USA
 The Netherlands
 Germany
 Italy
 Russia
 Sweden
 New Zealand
 Japan
 Australia
 France
 Switzerland
 Romania
 Canada
European Investment Bank’s Financial
Literacy Programme
Bringing together an international team
The United States
The Netherlands
Switzerland
Italy
Sweden
Germany
Turkey
Spain
Portugal
The Financial Literacy Programme connects 9
countries and builds an international collaboration
on financial education.
Distribution of Responses to Financial Literacy Questions (%)
NB: Only 30% correctly answer all 3 questions; less than half (46%) got
the first two questions right.
Responses
Correct Incorrect DK Refuse
Interest rate 65% 21% 13% 1%
Inflation 64% 20% 14% 2%
Risk diversif. 52% 13% 34% 1%
How much do Americans know?
Distribution of responses across the U.S. population
(2009 National Financial Capability Survey)
NB: Less than half (45%) correctly answer all 3 questions; 73% got the
first two questions right.
Responses
Correct Incorrect DK Refuse
Interest rate 85% 5% 9% 1%
Inflation 77% 8% 14% 1%
Risk diversif. 52% 13% 33% 2%
How much do the Dutch know?
Distribution of responses across the Dutch population
(2010 DNB Household Survey)
FLat World: Strikingly similar patterns
across countries
 Financial illiteracy is widespread
• Less than half of the population in many
countries can answer three basic financial
literacy questions
 Risk diversification is most difficult
concept
• The majority of individuals lack knowledge of
concepts such as risk diversification and do
not understand the relationship between risk
and return
• Similar pattern of response across countries
• Prevalence of “do not know” answers
• Risk literacy matters for financial decisions
Who are the vulnerable groups?
 Who knows the least?
• Those with low income/education, immigrants,
those living in rural areas, the elderly, the young
and women
 Women have lower financial literacy
• Need to look closer at the evidence
 The young have lower financial literacy
• Most data sets have information on respondents age
18 and older. New data is available for 15-year olds.
Financial knowledge among women
 Very robust findings of large gender differences in financial knowledge
 Women are much more likely to say “I do not know”
22%
35%
47%
39%38%
55%
60%
62%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
US Netherlands Germany Switzerland
Financial knowledge by gender
(% answering 3 Qs correctly)
Women Men
50%
46%
43%
22%
34%
29% 30%
12%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
US Netherlands Germany Switzerland
At least one "don't know" answer, by
gender
Women Men
Financial knowledge among the young
Compared to other age groups, financial knowledge among the young is very low
13%
22%
28%
34%
38% 38%
42% 43%
50%
55% 54%
49%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75+
Financial knowledge by age in the United States –
2012 US National Financial Capability Study
(% answering 3 questions correctly)
New data for 15-year-olds around the
world
We have important new
data
 2012 Programme for
International Student
Assessment (PISA)
 Measuring financial
literacy among high
school students
Strong performance in
financial literacy
Low performance in financial literacy
Average performance
of 15-year-olds in
financial literacy
Shanghai-China
Flemish Community
(Belgium)
Estonia
Australia
New Zealand
Czech Republic Poland
Latvia
United States
France Russian FederationSlovenia Spain
Croatia
Israel
Slovak Republic
Italy
Colombia375
385
395
405
415
425
435
445
455
465
475
485
495
505
515
525
535
545
555
565
575
585
595
605
Mean score
625 and
above
550 to
<625
475 to
<550
400 to
<475
Less
than 400
points
Financial literacy
performance levels
Top performers
Baseline
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
Distribution of student performance
Some important findings
 A lot of the variation in financial literacy is
explained by socio-economic background
(parent’s income and education)
 We start unequal when it comes to financial
literacy and inequality will only grow
 How to provide equality of opportunity early in
life?
Relationship between socio-economic status and financial
literacy, mathematics, and reading performance
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Estonia
Italy
RussianFederation
Croatia
Australia
Fl.Com.(Belgium)
Poland
Shanghai-China
Colombia
Latvia
CzechRepublic
OECDaverage-13
Israel
Spain
France
Slovenia
UnitedStates
SlovakRepublic
NewZealand
Financial literacy Mathematics Reading
Percentageofvariationinperformance
explainedbysocio-economicstatus
Why should we care?
 Financial knowledge can be linked to behavior:
saving, borrowing, investing, and retirement planning
 Financial knowledge is linked to wealth inequality
 Our paper shows that 30-40% of wealth inequality can
be attributed to financial knowledge
Implications for financial education:
What the research suggests
 Need to improve levels of financial literacy
 Levels of knowledge are low globally
 Need for more targeted programs
 One size does not fit all
 Women are an ideal group for fin. educ. programs
 Young have very low financial knowledge in all
countries
 Even in countries with advanced financial markets
 Very important to provide access to all
Scalability: Reaching the population
 In schools
• Easier to reach the young
 In the workplace
• Easier to reach the adults
 In libraries, local communities,
museums
• Where people go to learn
Venues for financial education
Financial education in schools
Financial education in school is critically important:
 Investment in higher education is one of the most
important decisions the young face
• Young people need to understand the weight of this decision
 Need to be financially literate before engaging in
financial transactions
• It is much cheaper to educate the young
 Provide an equal opportunity to learn
• Without fin educ, the young enter adult life on unequal footing
Need to prepare the new generations
Call to action
Need to train the teachers
Rigorous curriculum
 Move the focus from “Is it effective?” to “How
do we make this effective?”
 Make the content relevant and engaging
Start early
Improving financial education in school
Call to action
 Talk to the Ministry of Education
 We need ambassadors of financial literacy!
Make it simple, complexity is a barrier,
particularly in the face of widespread financial
illiteracy
 Learn from data and research, continue to
experiment
Improving financial education overall
Example 1:
A new Personal Finance Course in college
Financial Decision-Making: Implications for the
Consumer and the Professional
 Cover personal finance with a rigorous approach
• A quantitative approach to personal finance
• Teaching takes into consideration gender differences in fin literacy
 It incorporates some macro, accounting, and risk
management
 Writing a new textbook on personal finance
• Joint with a mathematician and a professional writer
Example 2:
A program for the young
 Kept the message free of economic/finance jargon
 Covered concepts, such as risk diversification, in a simple story
 After being exposed to videos, the knowledge and financial
decision-making improved
Five steps to planning success
 We designed a program for young
workers
 Used videos
Example 3. Other venues: A network of
Finance Museums
28
GFLEC’s global network: Ongoing projects around the
world
Experimental
Economics
Psychology
Business
Economics
LinguisticsEntrepreneurs
Financial
Literacy
Our approach is multidisciplinary
FinLab: A Financial Innovation Lab
 Addressing current needs
• Advance understanding of what works in financial education
• Integrate financial education and technology
• Improve financial education programs’ effectiveness
• Customize financial education: one size does not fit all
 Our Aim: Drive change in financial education by
identifying and fostering the strategies and innovations
that promise to transform the financial education
landscape
We have set up a Financial Education Innovation Fund
Final thoughts
Financial literacy is like reading and writing
• As it was not possible in the past to participate in
society without being able to read and write, so it is not
possible to thrive in today’s society without being
financially literate
Building human capital for the 21st century
• Everyone deals with finance and finance is sufficiently
complex that we cannot leave it to the individual to
learn by himself/herself
Financial literacy skills for the 21st century
Contact and further information
Annamaria Lusardi
Global Financial Literacy Excellence Center (GFLEC)
E-mail: alusardi@gwu.edu
Webpage: www.gflec.org
Blog: http://annalusardi.blogspot.com/
Twitter: @A_Lusardi
Facebook: Global Financial Literacy Excellence Center Page

Financial Literacy and Economic Outcomes: Evidence and Policy Implications

  • 1.
    Financial Education Roundtable EuropeanMoney Week – March 9, 2015 Annamaria Lusardi The George Washington School of Business Academic Director, Global Financial Literacy Excellence Center (GFLEC) Financial Literacy and Economic Outcomes: Evidence and Policy Implications
  • 2.
    The growing importanceof financial literacy Major changes that increase individuals’ responsibility for their financial well-being  Changes in the pension landscape • More individual accounts and private pensions  Changes in labor markets • Divergence in wages – skills are critical  Changes in financial markets • Greater complexity • More opportunities to borrow & in large amounts A new economic landscape
  • 3.
    Increase in individualresponsibility  Individuals make many financial decisions • Investment in education • Financial security after retirement • Investing in financial markets & other markets (buying a home, car, etc.)  Not enough to look at asset side; liability side is equally important • Increase in household debt • Debt normally incurs higher interest rates than what is earned on assets  Financial decisions are complex • Many more financial products than in the past More complex financial decisions
  • 4.
    A large amountof research in past 15 years 1. How well-equipped are people to make financial decisions? 2. Are there vulnerable groups? 3. Does financial literacy matter? 4. What can be done to promote financial literacy and financial decision-making? Some questions
  • 5.
    Measuring financial literacy 1.“Suppose you had $100 in a savings account and the interest rate was 2% per year. After 5 years, how much do you think you would have in the account if you left the money to grow?” 2. “Imagine that the interest rate on your savings account was 1% per year and inflation was 2% per year. After 1 year, with the money in this account, would you be able to buy…” 3. “Do you think the following statement is true or false? Buying a single company stock usually provides a safer return than a stock mutual fund.”  More than $102  Exactly $102  Less than $102  Don’t know  Refuse to answer  More than today  Exactly the same as today  Less than today  Don`t know  Refuse to answer  True  False  Don`t know  Refuse to answer
  • 6.
    Financial Literacy aroundthe World (FLat World) Evidence from 13 countries:  USA  The Netherlands  Germany  Italy  Russia  Sweden  New Zealand  Japan  Australia  France  Switzerland  Romania  Canada
  • 7.
    European Investment Bank’sFinancial Literacy Programme Bringing together an international team The United States The Netherlands Switzerland Italy Sweden Germany Turkey Spain Portugal The Financial Literacy Programme connects 9 countries and builds an international collaboration on financial education.
  • 8.
    Distribution of Responsesto Financial Literacy Questions (%) NB: Only 30% correctly answer all 3 questions; less than half (46%) got the first two questions right. Responses Correct Incorrect DK Refuse Interest rate 65% 21% 13% 1% Inflation 64% 20% 14% 2% Risk diversif. 52% 13% 34% 1% How much do Americans know? Distribution of responses across the U.S. population (2009 National Financial Capability Survey)
  • 9.
    NB: Less thanhalf (45%) correctly answer all 3 questions; 73% got the first two questions right. Responses Correct Incorrect DK Refuse Interest rate 85% 5% 9% 1% Inflation 77% 8% 14% 1% Risk diversif. 52% 13% 33% 2% How much do the Dutch know? Distribution of responses across the Dutch population (2010 DNB Household Survey)
  • 10.
    FLat World: Strikinglysimilar patterns across countries  Financial illiteracy is widespread • Less than half of the population in many countries can answer three basic financial literacy questions  Risk diversification is most difficult concept • The majority of individuals lack knowledge of concepts such as risk diversification and do not understand the relationship between risk and return • Similar pattern of response across countries • Prevalence of “do not know” answers • Risk literacy matters for financial decisions
  • 11.
    Who are thevulnerable groups?  Who knows the least? • Those with low income/education, immigrants, those living in rural areas, the elderly, the young and women  Women have lower financial literacy • Need to look closer at the evidence  The young have lower financial literacy • Most data sets have information on respondents age 18 and older. New data is available for 15-year olds.
  • 12.
    Financial knowledge amongwomen  Very robust findings of large gender differences in financial knowledge  Women are much more likely to say “I do not know” 22% 35% 47% 39%38% 55% 60% 62% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% US Netherlands Germany Switzerland Financial knowledge by gender (% answering 3 Qs correctly) Women Men 50% 46% 43% 22% 34% 29% 30% 12% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% US Netherlands Germany Switzerland At least one "don't know" answer, by gender Women Men
  • 13.
    Financial knowledge amongthe young Compared to other age groups, financial knowledge among the young is very low 13% 22% 28% 34% 38% 38% 42% 43% 50% 55% 54% 49% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75+ Financial knowledge by age in the United States – 2012 US National Financial Capability Study (% answering 3 questions correctly)
  • 14.
    New data for15-year-olds around the world We have important new data  2012 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)  Measuring financial literacy among high school students
  • 15.
    Strong performance in financialliteracy Low performance in financial literacy Average performance of 15-year-olds in financial literacy Shanghai-China Flemish Community (Belgium) Estonia Australia New Zealand Czech Republic Poland Latvia United States France Russian FederationSlovenia Spain Croatia Israel Slovak Republic Italy Colombia375 385 395 405 415 425 435 445 455 465 475 485 495 505 515 525 535 545 555 565 575 585 595 605 Mean score
  • 16.
    625 and above 550 to <625 475to <550 400 to <475 Less than 400 points Financial literacy performance levels Top performers Baseline L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 Distribution of student performance
  • 17.
    Some important findings A lot of the variation in financial literacy is explained by socio-economic background (parent’s income and education)  We start unequal when it comes to financial literacy and inequality will only grow  How to provide equality of opportunity early in life?
  • 18.
    Relationship between socio-economicstatus and financial literacy, mathematics, and reading performance 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Estonia Italy RussianFederation Croatia Australia Fl.Com.(Belgium) Poland Shanghai-China Colombia Latvia CzechRepublic OECDaverage-13 Israel Spain France Slovenia UnitedStates SlovakRepublic NewZealand Financial literacy Mathematics Reading Percentageofvariationinperformance explainedbysocio-economicstatus
  • 19.
    Why should wecare?  Financial knowledge can be linked to behavior: saving, borrowing, investing, and retirement planning  Financial knowledge is linked to wealth inequality  Our paper shows that 30-40% of wealth inequality can be attributed to financial knowledge
  • 20.
    Implications for financialeducation: What the research suggests  Need to improve levels of financial literacy  Levels of knowledge are low globally  Need for more targeted programs  One size does not fit all  Women are an ideal group for fin. educ. programs  Young have very low financial knowledge in all countries  Even in countries with advanced financial markets  Very important to provide access to all
  • 21.
    Scalability: Reaching thepopulation  In schools • Easier to reach the young  In the workplace • Easier to reach the adults  In libraries, local communities, museums • Where people go to learn Venues for financial education
  • 22.
    Financial education inschools Financial education in school is critically important:  Investment in higher education is one of the most important decisions the young face • Young people need to understand the weight of this decision  Need to be financially literate before engaging in financial transactions • It is much cheaper to educate the young  Provide an equal opportunity to learn • Without fin educ, the young enter adult life on unequal footing Need to prepare the new generations
  • 23.
    Call to action Needto train the teachers Rigorous curriculum  Move the focus from “Is it effective?” to “How do we make this effective?”  Make the content relevant and engaging Start early Improving financial education in school
  • 24.
    Call to action Talk to the Ministry of Education  We need ambassadors of financial literacy! Make it simple, complexity is a barrier, particularly in the face of widespread financial illiteracy  Learn from data and research, continue to experiment Improving financial education overall
  • 25.
    Example 1: A newPersonal Finance Course in college Financial Decision-Making: Implications for the Consumer and the Professional  Cover personal finance with a rigorous approach • A quantitative approach to personal finance • Teaching takes into consideration gender differences in fin literacy  It incorporates some macro, accounting, and risk management  Writing a new textbook on personal finance • Joint with a mathematician and a professional writer
  • 26.
    Example 2: A programfor the young  Kept the message free of economic/finance jargon  Covered concepts, such as risk diversification, in a simple story  After being exposed to videos, the knowledge and financial decision-making improved Five steps to planning success  We designed a program for young workers  Used videos
  • 27.
    Example 3. Othervenues: A network of Finance Museums
  • 28.
    28 GFLEC’s global network:Ongoing projects around the world
  • 29.
  • 30.
    FinLab: A FinancialInnovation Lab  Addressing current needs • Advance understanding of what works in financial education • Integrate financial education and technology • Improve financial education programs’ effectiveness • Customize financial education: one size does not fit all  Our Aim: Drive change in financial education by identifying and fostering the strategies and innovations that promise to transform the financial education landscape We have set up a Financial Education Innovation Fund
  • 31.
    Final thoughts Financial literacyis like reading and writing • As it was not possible in the past to participate in society without being able to read and write, so it is not possible to thrive in today’s society without being financially literate Building human capital for the 21st century • Everyone deals with finance and finance is sufficiently complex that we cannot leave it to the individual to learn by himself/herself
  • 32.
    Financial literacy skillsfor the 21st century
  • 33.
    Contact and furtherinformation Annamaria Lusardi Global Financial Literacy Excellence Center (GFLEC) E-mail: [email protected] Webpage: www.gflec.org Blog: http://annalusardi.blogspot.com/ Twitter: @A_Lusardi Facebook: Global Financial Literacy Excellence Center Page

Editor's Notes

  • #16 This chart illustrates the financial literacy scale, from below the OECD average, marked in red, to around the OECD average, marked in yellow, to high performance, marked in green
  • #19 DELETED NOTE WHICH WAS ALL PROBLEM SOLVING