Finland: A
model of what
is possible
within our
Professional
Learning
Community
Patricia M. Page
2014 RI Teacher of the Year
Business & Computer Tech Educator
Disclaimer: The professional perspective I present is
my own. It may not reflect the policy or programmatic
position of the East Greenwich Public Schools or the
RI Department of Education and related entities.
❏ Social welfare structure
❏ Continuity at policy level
❏ Singular value system
❏ Sisu
David Bosso blog: highlighting cultural differences
❏ Trust in teachers and system
❏ Autonomy
Finland:U.S. Comparative Data ***
Education in Finland versus “US”:
Focused on the Possibilities
❏ Teacher preparation and pedagogy
❏ Vertical articulation PK-20: “no dead ends”
❏ Formative versus summative “autopsy”
assessment [matriculation exam]
❏ Frameworks based on national “curriculum”
Full curriculum link
❏ Targets beyond PISA: “create future we
want”
❏ Movement toward phenomena-based
learning
Finland’s Focus
1 Stupid is no longer stupid
2 Grades do not represent the full scope of learning
3 Teachers must not work alone
4 Tear the school down, build a village
5 Degrees do not matter, competencies do
6 Jungle of projects is senseless
7 Fairness replaces equality
8 Technology is about humans, not devices
9 Education is worth taking to places where it does not
VISION 2025
Link to ICT
(Techology Plan)
Narrative Shift
Dialing down the deficit dialogue
Which student
will be equipped
to tackle the
challenges of
citizenship & life
in the 21st C?
@kenkay21
Finland: A model of
what is possible within
our Professional
Learning Community
Forward Focus After
Finland: action items
identified by U.S. educators
> Principals to co-teach one
class per year
> Finalists for all teaching
positions to conduct a lesson
> Identify key phenomena to
replace subject-specific
inquiry-based projects
> Review schedule to
increase just-in-time
conversations among
teachers and administrators
between classes
>Delegate more responsibility
and authority to teams of
teachers; avoid bifurcation
Links to Resources
Finnish Education in a Nutshell: pamphlet-format
overview of education governance; teacher
credentialing and operational philosophy
Ideology and Implementation: presentation by Kristiina
Volmari, Finnish National Board of Education
Check out http://centerforstudentwork.elschools.org to
see examples of student work that reflects 21st Century
skills. #EFSummit @ExpedLearning
Competency resources at http://edleader21.com

Findings from finland

  • 1.
    Finland: A model ofwhat is possible within our Professional Learning Community Patricia M. Page 2014 RI Teacher of the Year Business & Computer Tech Educator Disclaimer: The professional perspective I present is my own. It may not reflect the policy or programmatic position of the East Greenwich Public Schools or the RI Department of Education and related entities.
  • 2.
    ❏ Social welfarestructure ❏ Continuity at policy level ❏ Singular value system ❏ Sisu David Bosso blog: highlighting cultural differences ❏ Trust in teachers and system ❏ Autonomy Finland:U.S. Comparative Data *** Education in Finland versus “US”: Focused on the Possibilities
  • 3.
    ❏ Teacher preparationand pedagogy ❏ Vertical articulation PK-20: “no dead ends” ❏ Formative versus summative “autopsy” assessment [matriculation exam] ❏ Frameworks based on national “curriculum” Full curriculum link ❏ Targets beyond PISA: “create future we want” ❏ Movement toward phenomena-based learning Finland’s Focus
  • 5.
    1 Stupid isno longer stupid 2 Grades do not represent the full scope of learning 3 Teachers must not work alone 4 Tear the school down, build a village 5 Degrees do not matter, competencies do 6 Jungle of projects is senseless 7 Fairness replaces equality 8 Technology is about humans, not devices 9 Education is worth taking to places where it does not VISION 2025
  • 7.
  • 10.
    Narrative Shift Dialing downthe deficit dialogue
  • 13.
    Which student will beequipped to tackle the challenges of citizenship & life in the 21st C? @kenkay21
  • 14.
    Finland: A modelof what is possible within our Professional Learning Community Forward Focus After Finland: action items identified by U.S. educators > Principals to co-teach one class per year > Finalists for all teaching positions to conduct a lesson > Identify key phenomena to replace subject-specific inquiry-based projects > Review schedule to increase just-in-time conversations among teachers and administrators between classes >Delegate more responsibility and authority to teams of teachers; avoid bifurcation
  • 15.
    Links to Resources FinnishEducation in a Nutshell: pamphlet-format overview of education governance; teacher credentialing and operational philosophy Ideology and Implementation: presentation by Kristiina Volmari, Finnish National Board of Education Check out http://centerforstudentwork.elschools.org to see examples of student work that reflects 21st Century skills. #EFSummit @ExpedLearning Competency resources at http://edleader21.com

Editor's Notes

  • #2 Discussions about what constitutes World Class School system; Goal was to ask questions and engage policy leaders, university professors, headmasters, classroom teachers and students in conversations about the strategies and practices that have a positive effect on the learning environment for all stakeholders, ones that we could replicate without changing our governance model or social welfare structure. Their conversations are framed as “these are the possibiities….”
  • #3 Paternity benefits full to partial pay; subsidized child care; health care….50% of every Euro earned Flat organization structure that lends itself to autonomy Changes at Parliamentary level have no impact on Education Policy Leaders at Ministry of Education -- regional directors focus on PD -- headmasters and teachers -- no LEAs (school committees) or department heads Movement from equality to equity Discuss Sisu (see’so) -- beyond grit; not just a matter of digging deep when confronted with a challenge; part of their inner fortitude and constitution; don’t ruminate; move on…. no English translation; no Finnish translation for accountability
  • #4 Trust in Teachers is a product of credentials Master’s degree + minimum 300 European credits; focus on pedagogy and research-based requirements. Write multiple formal thesis papers -- equivalent of Knowledge Acquisition Modules written precursor to a dissertation 8000 applicants to teacher program; 800 study places. Read 4-5 research based articles 250 pages plus each (1 month to read) All applicants take paper test and answer 1 question; not much space; well constructed have 4 hours to finish -- not text or concept specific 100 objective questions Make it to next round Interviews -- open ended -- tell us what you’d like us to know about …. 300 credits; 70 research based -- grades 1-6 $4500 Euros month -$59,000 per year U.S. Education system does not develop deep thinkers and students
  • #5 Parallels to EGSD Strategic Priorities Everyone is eager to learn….note / developing vision:
  • #6 Written by a consortium of stakeholders finished June 2015 Provocative by design-- How did you do in school -- what are we measuring Portfolios Transferable skills -- College and Career Readiness PBL; grant applications movement from equality to equity whole child
  • #7 Work ensuing on two critical parallel tracks; vision 2025 work and national core curriculum effective 2016; tenets became basis of national core curriculum
  • #9 75 minute lessons; 75 courses; 50 similar --25-40 school decided ICT labs will be removed.
  • #10 Backwards design model is backward
  • #13 Export entrepreneurial spirit Did with our pedagogy
  • #15 Their conversations are framed as “these are the possibiities….”