2
Most read
6
Most read
7
Most read
Tool Marks Examination and
Evaluation
Suryakant Mishra
Asst. Professor
Department of Zoology
& Forensic Science
Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra
Introduction :
A tool mark is any impression, cut, gouge, or abrasion
caused by a tool coming into contact with another
object.
For example, a screwdriver or crowbar could produce
tool marks by being impressed into or scraped along
the surface of another object.
Tool marks
Fig: A flat-bladed screwdriver
Tool marks play a very vital role
in forensic science, as the
criminals have a tendency to use
tools for committing crimes
such as
Burglaries and theft
Murders
Vehicle accidents
Death due to firing Fig: bullet holes and deep sliding
marks on car
Types of evidence submitted in tool marks cases
include tools like:
Bolt cutters
 Screwdrivers and chisels
 Scissors
 Knives and box cutters
 Pliers and wrenches
 Crowbars tire irons
 Saws and hammers
 Firearms
Basis of tool marks identification:
Law of individuality
Locard’s exchange principle
Permanency
Tool marks have two different
kinds of characteristics:
Characteristics of tool marks
Class characteristics:
 Common to a group of objects
General Shape • General Dimensions • Do not
permit identification of exact tool used
Example: A hammer has a characteristic
dimensions length and width
Individual characteristics:
Unique to a given object (microscopic nature)
Example: indentations, defect marks , striations
marks
Type of Tool Marks :
1. Impressed marks
The first type is an impression which is a
negative reproduction of the tool
surface, As a tool hits a softer surface,
the shape of the tool and imperfections
in its surface may be left behind as an
impression.
such as screw driver or pry bar impressions
left on windows or punch impressions
on safes or : crow bar into wood
2. Abrasions/ scraps or striations marks:
Caused when a tool slides or scratches across another surface
which produces striated areas on the marked surface.
Occasionally impressions made by tools with striated surfaces
may resemble in appearance abrasion or
friction marks
Example: sliding a screw driver along the side of a car surface
3. Cutting (“crushed”) marks:
 Caused by pressure being
applied to both sides of an
object
Examples: pliers or wire
cutters
4. Repetitive cut marks
 Caused by repetitive actions
Example: a saw marks
5. Drill holes
Fig: repetitive cut
marks (saw marks)
Collection of Tool Mark Evidence
Step 1: Collection and recording
of tool marks form crime
scene :
a. Photography:
b. Casting methods of tool marks
collection
 Plaster of Paris
 Plasticine
 Latex and plastic solution
 Dental stone
 Wood metal
 Adhesive tape
Two types of photographs are needed for courtroom
identification.
• An over-all photo depicting the entire object which bears
the toolmark.
• A close-up photo showing the detail of the toolmark. This
close-up is for identification and orientation only and
cannot be used for actual comparisons.
• Photograph of tool marks should be taken with scale
Sharps packaging
The operating surfaces of suspect tools should
be protected and preserved.
The tool should be individually packaged and
identified with a string tag bearing the
information required by agency crime scene
search protocols.
If a tool is a sharp, especially a potentially
body fluid-contaminated sharp, it should be
packaged in a leak proof, puncture-resistant,
sealed container.
Source:
https://projects.nfstc.org/firearms/module06/fir_m06
_t06_05_f.htm
Plastic containers are generally useful for packaging evidence because
they can be sealed closed and permit observation of the contents.
However, they must not be used for packaging of biological evidence.
Biological evidence, such as blood-stained clothing or vegetation
suspected to be cannabis, should be packaged in paper containers
that allow airflow around the material.
Plastic is not recommended for packaging firearms evidence since any
moisture present could promote rusting of the item.
Step 2: Make test marks with the suspected
tool for comparison purpose:
 Similar surface material where tool mark was present
preferably used for collection of standards
 or Make a cast of the marks, usually with silicone rubber.
Comparison process:
1. Comparison of class characteristics- such as dimensions,
shape, length and width, depth.
2. Comparison of individual characteristics.
Examination and matching of tool marks:
1. Mechanical fit
2. Comparison microscope
3. Stereomicroscope
4. Striagraphy
5. Superimposition
Fig: Comparison microscope Fig: stereomicroscope
Comparison and matching of tool marks:
1. Physical match: mechanical fit
2. Side by side match
3. composite match
4. Superimposition
Fig: Side by side matching of fired
cartridges base marks
A comparison microscope is
used to perform the
comparison process.
 The unknown tool mark is
placed on the left side of the
microscope and the known
mark on the right side.
 If individual characteristics of
both tool marks match, the
common origin between the
unknown tool mark and the
tool is established.
Figure: composite match of striations marks on fired
bullets
Comparison photomicrograph of test sledge
hammer mark on lead (left) and hammer
mark on burglarized safe dial (right).
Forensic analysis of tool marks
Forensic analysis of tool marks

More Related Content

PPTX
Tool marks and its forensic significance
PPTX
PPTX
Tool marks
PPTX
restoration of toolmarks
PPT
Glass Evidence
PPTX
Glass fractures
PPTX
Glass fracture
PPTX
Paint analysis
Tool marks and its forensic significance
Tool marks
restoration of toolmarks
Glass Evidence
Glass fractures
Glass fracture
Paint analysis

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Development of Latent Fingerprints
PPTX
Tyre and skid marks
PPTX
ear print.pptx
PPTX
Physical Examination Of Tyre Marks
PPTX
Charred documents
PPTX
Forensic Question Document Examination,
PPTX
Poroscopy and edgeoscopy
PPTX
forensic questioned document examination
PPTX
EAR PRINT.pptx
DOCX
Toolmarks
PPTX
Age of documents (Questioned Document)
PPTX
Fingerprint - Everything You Need To Know About Fingerprints
PPTX
Mobile Forensic Van (MFV)
PPTX
Forensic analysis of foot wear impression
PPTX
Improvised Firearms
PPTX
Gait forensic science
PPTX
Forensic examination of stamp, seal and other mechanical impressions
PPTX
Microscopic Analysis of Paints
PPTX
Examination of Firearm through Cartridge Case and bullet.pptx
PPTX
Age of document ppt mansi
Development of Latent Fingerprints
Tyre and skid marks
ear print.pptx
Physical Examination Of Tyre Marks
Charred documents
Forensic Question Document Examination,
Poroscopy and edgeoscopy
forensic questioned document examination
EAR PRINT.pptx
Toolmarks
Age of documents (Questioned Document)
Fingerprint - Everything You Need To Know About Fingerprints
Mobile Forensic Van (MFV)
Forensic analysis of foot wear impression
Improvised Firearms
Gait forensic science
Forensic examination of stamp, seal and other mechanical impressions
Microscopic Analysis of Paints
Examination of Firearm through Cartridge Case and bullet.pptx
Age of document ppt mansi
Ad

Similar to Forensic analysis of tool marks (20)

PPTX
Unit2_Toolmark impressions.pptx
PPTX
Forensic Importance of Tool marks. pptx.
PPTX
Soil-analysis,toolmarks, casting, and molding1.pptx
PDF
1649659069-343.pdf
PPT
Impression evidence
PPTX
Different types of marks produce during firing process
PPT
physicalevidence09 (2).ppt
PPT
Physicalevidence09
PPT
Physicalevidence09
PPT
impsevid09yu gfdchjuyt ghytfgb ttghuhgtt
PPTX
Physical evidence in forensic science-1.pptx
PPTX
Tool Marks-Classification and examination .pptx
PPT
FRS 310 Bite mark evidence.ppt
PPT
Physical Evidence
PPTX
Crimtic 1
PDF
Different types of marks produce during firing process
DOCX
Chapter 4 – Physical EvidenceClass Characteristics.docx
PPT
Unit 3 Creative Project
PPT
High School Forensic Science tool marks-1.ppt
PPT
Unit 3 Creative Project
Unit2_Toolmark impressions.pptx
Forensic Importance of Tool marks. pptx.
Soil-analysis,toolmarks, casting, and molding1.pptx
1649659069-343.pdf
Impression evidence
Different types of marks produce during firing process
physicalevidence09 (2).ppt
Physicalevidence09
Physicalevidence09
impsevid09yu gfdchjuyt ghytfgb ttghuhgtt
Physical evidence in forensic science-1.pptx
Tool Marks-Classification and examination .pptx
FRS 310 Bite mark evidence.ppt
Physical Evidence
Crimtic 1
Different types of marks produce during firing process
Chapter 4 – Physical EvidenceClass Characteristics.docx
Unit 3 Creative Project
High School Forensic Science tool marks-1.ppt
Unit 3 Creative Project
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
RIZALS-LIFE-HIGHER-EDUCATION-AND-LIFE-ABROAD.pptx
PDF
Literature_Review_methods_ BRACU_MKT426 course material
PDF
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2021).pdf
PDF
1.Salivary gland disease.pdf 3.Bleeding and Clotting Disorders.pdf important
PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
PDF
Civil Department's presentation Your score increases as you pick a category
PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PDF
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
PDF
IP : I ; Unit I : Preformulation Studies
PDF
CRP102_SAGALASSOS_Final_Projects_2025.pdf
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART (3) REALITY & MYSTERY.pdf
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PDF
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
PDF
Everyday Spelling and Grammar by Kathi Wyldeck
PPTX
Education and Perspectives of Education.pptx
PDF
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PPTX
DRUGS USED FOR HORMONAL DISORDER, SUPPLIMENTATION, CONTRACEPTION, & MEDICAL T...
PDF
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
RIZALS-LIFE-HIGHER-EDUCATION-AND-LIFE-ABROAD.pptx
Literature_Review_methods_ BRACU_MKT426 course material
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2021).pdf
1.Salivary gland disease.pdf 3.Bleeding and Clotting Disorders.pdf important
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
Civil Department's presentation Your score increases as you pick a category
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
IP : I ; Unit I : Preformulation Studies
CRP102_SAGALASSOS_Final_Projects_2025.pdf
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART (3) REALITY & MYSTERY.pdf
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
Everyday Spelling and Grammar by Kathi Wyldeck
Education and Perspectives of Education.pptx
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
DRUGS USED FOR HORMONAL DISORDER, SUPPLIMENTATION, CONTRACEPTION, & MEDICAL T...
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes

Forensic analysis of tool marks

  • 1. Tool Marks Examination and Evaluation Suryakant Mishra Asst. Professor Department of Zoology & Forensic Science Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra
  • 2. Introduction : A tool mark is any impression, cut, gouge, or abrasion caused by a tool coming into contact with another object. For example, a screwdriver or crowbar could produce tool marks by being impressed into or scraped along the surface of another object. Tool marks Fig: A flat-bladed screwdriver
  • 3. Tool marks play a very vital role in forensic science, as the criminals have a tendency to use tools for committing crimes such as Burglaries and theft Murders Vehicle accidents Death due to firing Fig: bullet holes and deep sliding marks on car
  • 4. Types of evidence submitted in tool marks cases include tools like: Bolt cutters  Screwdrivers and chisels  Scissors  Knives and box cutters  Pliers and wrenches  Crowbars tire irons  Saws and hammers  Firearms
  • 5. Basis of tool marks identification: Law of individuality Locard’s exchange principle Permanency
  • 6. Tool marks have two different kinds of characteristics: Characteristics of tool marks Class characteristics:  Common to a group of objects General Shape • General Dimensions • Do not permit identification of exact tool used Example: A hammer has a characteristic dimensions length and width Individual characteristics: Unique to a given object (microscopic nature) Example: indentations, defect marks , striations marks
  • 7. Type of Tool Marks : 1. Impressed marks The first type is an impression which is a negative reproduction of the tool surface, As a tool hits a softer surface, the shape of the tool and imperfections in its surface may be left behind as an impression. such as screw driver or pry bar impressions left on windows or punch impressions on safes or : crow bar into wood
  • 8. 2. Abrasions/ scraps or striations marks: Caused when a tool slides or scratches across another surface which produces striated areas on the marked surface. Occasionally impressions made by tools with striated surfaces may resemble in appearance abrasion or friction marks Example: sliding a screw driver along the side of a car surface
  • 9. 3. Cutting (“crushed”) marks:  Caused by pressure being applied to both sides of an object Examples: pliers or wire cutters 4. Repetitive cut marks  Caused by repetitive actions Example: a saw marks 5. Drill holes Fig: repetitive cut marks (saw marks)
  • 10. Collection of Tool Mark Evidence Step 1: Collection and recording of tool marks form crime scene : a. Photography: b. Casting methods of tool marks collection  Plaster of Paris  Plasticine  Latex and plastic solution  Dental stone  Wood metal  Adhesive tape
  • 11. Two types of photographs are needed for courtroom identification. • An over-all photo depicting the entire object which bears the toolmark. • A close-up photo showing the detail of the toolmark. This close-up is for identification and orientation only and cannot be used for actual comparisons. • Photograph of tool marks should be taken with scale
  • 12. Sharps packaging The operating surfaces of suspect tools should be protected and preserved. The tool should be individually packaged and identified with a string tag bearing the information required by agency crime scene search protocols. If a tool is a sharp, especially a potentially body fluid-contaminated sharp, it should be packaged in a leak proof, puncture-resistant, sealed container. Source: https://projects.nfstc.org/firearms/module06/fir_m06 _t06_05_f.htm
  • 13. Plastic containers are generally useful for packaging evidence because they can be sealed closed and permit observation of the contents. However, they must not be used for packaging of biological evidence. Biological evidence, such as blood-stained clothing or vegetation suspected to be cannabis, should be packaged in paper containers that allow airflow around the material. Plastic is not recommended for packaging firearms evidence since any moisture present could promote rusting of the item.
  • 14. Step 2: Make test marks with the suspected tool for comparison purpose:  Similar surface material where tool mark was present preferably used for collection of standards  or Make a cast of the marks, usually with silicone rubber. Comparison process: 1. Comparison of class characteristics- such as dimensions, shape, length and width, depth. 2. Comparison of individual characteristics.
  • 15. Examination and matching of tool marks: 1. Mechanical fit 2. Comparison microscope 3. Stereomicroscope 4. Striagraphy 5. Superimposition
  • 16. Fig: Comparison microscope Fig: stereomicroscope
  • 17. Comparison and matching of tool marks: 1. Physical match: mechanical fit 2. Side by side match 3. composite match 4. Superimposition
  • 18. Fig: Side by side matching of fired cartridges base marks A comparison microscope is used to perform the comparison process.  The unknown tool mark is placed on the left side of the microscope and the known mark on the right side.  If individual characteristics of both tool marks match, the common origin between the unknown tool mark and the tool is established.
  • 19. Figure: composite match of striations marks on fired bullets
  • 20. Comparison photomicrograph of test sledge hammer mark on lead (left) and hammer mark on burglarized safe dial (right).