Fractures around the elbow
(Lateral condyle fractures and
intercondylar fractures)
Dr Siddhartha Sinha, Assistant Professor
Department of Orthopaedics
HIMSR and HAHC hospital, New Delhi
Anatomy
• Hinge joint with articulation between
• Lower end of the humerus with ulna
(humero-ulnar joint)
• Head of the radius (humero-radial joint).
• Distal humerus is enlarged to form
• Trochlea medially, Medial to the trochlea is
a prominent process - medial epicondyle
• Capitulum laterally, :Lateral to the
capitulum is the lateral epicondyle.
Three bony points relationship
• 3 Points
• Medial epicondyle,
• Lateral epicondyle
• Tip of the olecranon
• Extension = straight line
• Flexion = isosceles triangle
• Deranged in
• Elbow dislocation
• Lateral condyle/ Medial epiondyle #
• Intercondylar # elbow (increased base)
• Maintained in
• Supracondylar fractures
• 4th point: Head of radius (palpate in semi
flexed elbow in pronation and supination)
Carrying Angle
• Angle formed between
arm and forearm on full
extension and supination
• 11° in males
• 14° in females
• Evolution so that upper
limb can clear body
when carrying loads.
Carrying angle
• Increased = Cubitus valgus
• Decreased = Cubitus Varus
Paediatric elbow
• Upper extremity fractures 65-75% of all paeditric traumas due to
tendency of children to fall on oustretched hand.
• Distal humerus # -86% of all elbow # in children
• Supracondylar # - Most common
• Lateral condyle #
• Medial epicondyle #
• Physis may be confused for a fracture in children
• Good clinical examination
• Radiographs of bilateral elbow for comparison
Ossification around elbow
• A) CRMTOL:
Mnemonic for the appearance of the
ossification centers around the
elbow
• Capitellum: 6 months to 2 years;
includes the lateral crista of the
trochlea
• Radial head: 4 years
• Medial epicondyle: 6 to 7 years
• Trochlea: 8 years
• Olecranon: 8 to 10 years; often
multiple centers, which ultimately
fuse
• Lateral epicondyle: 12 years
• B) Age of fusion of ossification centers
Radiography of paediatric elbow
• Standard AP view
• Baumanns angle: the angulation
of the physeal line between the
lateral condyle and the distal
humeral metaphysis.
• Humeral- ulnar angle –true
carrying angle
• Metaphyseal –diaphyseal angle
• Special view-
• Jones view
• Internal and external rotation
views
• Lateral view
• Tear drop
• Shaft condylar angle
• Anterior Humeral line
• Coronoid line
• Lateral Humerocapitellar
angle
• Fat pad signs
• Olecranon (posterior)
• Coronoid (anterior)
• Supinator
Lateral condyle Fractures
• 17% of all distal humeral
fractures in children
• Peak age 6yrs
• Fracture of necessity- must be
fixed as it often leads to non
union
• Often result in less satisfactory
outcomes than supracondylar
fractures because:
• Diagnosis less obvious and may
be missed in subtle cases.
• Loss of motion is more severe
due to intra-articular nature.
• The incidence of growth
disturbance is higher
Anatomy of lateral condyle fractures
• Anatomy
• The ossification center of the lateral condyle extends to the lateral crista of
the trochlea.
• Typically accompanied by a soft tissue disruption
• origins of the extensor carpi radialis longus and the brachioradialis muscles
• remain attached to the free distal fragment, accounting for initial and late displacement
of the fracture.
• Disruption of the lateral crista of the trochlea (Milch type II fractures) results
in posterolateral subluxation of the proximal radius and ulna with consequent
cubitus valgus
Mechanism of injury
• “Pull-off” theory: Avulsion injury occurs by the
common extensor origin owing to a varus stress
exerted on the extended elbow.
• “Push-off” theory: A fall onto an extended upper
extremity results in axial load transmitted through
the forearm, causing the radial head to impinge on
the lateral condyle.
Clinical evaluation
• Pain
• Swelling
• Tenderness to
palpation
• Crepitus
• Painful range of
motion
• Pain on resisted wrist
extension
Radiographic Evaluation
• AP, lateral, and oblique views of the elbow
• Varus stress views may accentuate
displacement of the fracture.
• Radiological D/D:
• Lateral condyle fracture
• Fracture of the entire distal humeral physis
• Arthrogram: assess relationship of lateral condyle
to proximal radius and distinguish from complete
distal humeral physeal fracture
• MRI –
• Appreciate the direction of the fracture line
and the pattern of fracture.
• Not routinely done
Classification of lateral condyle fractures
• Milch
• Type I
• The fracture line courses lateral to the trochlea and
into the capitellar–trochlear groove.
• Salter-Harris type IV fracture: the elbow is stable
because the trochlea is intact
• Less common.
• Type II:
• The fracture line extends into the apex of the
trochlea.
• Salter-Harris type II fracture
• Elbow is unstable because the trochlea is disrupted;
• More common
Classification
• Stages of displacement (Jakob et al)
• Stage 1: Fracture relatively non displaced,
articular surface intact, trochlea intact, no
lateral shift of olecranon
• Stage 2: Fracture extends completely through
the articular surface, proximal fragment
displaced, lateral shift of olecranon
• Stage 3 condylar fragment rotated, displaced
laterally and proximally, translocation of
olecranon and radial head.
Treatment
• Non operative
• Non-displaced or minimally displaced fractures
(Jakob stage I; <2 mm)
• Simple immobilization in a posterior splint or
long arm cast with the forearm in neutral
position and the elbow flexed to 90 degrees
• This is maintained for 3 to 6 weeks until
there is healing of the fracture, after which
range-of-motion exercises are instituted.
• Closed reduction
• Varus force as well as supination and extension may be attempted
• Jakob type II fractures.
• If articular reduction is achieved hold with percutaneous wires in order to
prevent displacement.
• An arthrogram can be performed to ensure a reduction was achieved.
• Closed reduction is often difficult because of medial soft tissue swelling
• Not routinely done
• Open Reduction
• Stages II and III fractures.
• Open reduction using lateral approach
and fixation with K wires
• Postoperative immobilization -long arm
casting/slab with the forearm in neutral
rotation and the elbow flexed to 90
degrees for 3 to 4 weeks
• After 3-4 weeks pins and the cast may
be discontinued and active range-of-
motion exercises instituted.
• If treatment is delayed (>3 to 6
weeks)
• closed treatment regardless of
displacement,
• High incidence of osteonecrosis of the
trochlea and significant joint stiffness
from extensive dissection with late open
reduction
Complications of lateral condyle fractures
1. Nonunion:
• Wide displacement of fragment
and soft tissue interposition
• “ Pull of extensors” attached to
fragment
• Treatment: Early cases- ORIF,
Late cases- Manage
consequences like deformity
and instability
• Angular deformity:
• Cubitus valgus may result from
overgrowth of the medial
condyle.
• Treatment of cubitus valgus:
• Mild – no t/t
• Moderate to severe deformity-
supracondylar osteotomy
3. Late ulnar nerve palsy (tardy Ulnar nerve palsy)
due to cubitus valgus (late complicaition)
1. C/o tingling and numbness in the distribution of
ulnar nerve
2. T/t : Anterior transposition of ulnar nerve in front
of the medial epicondyle to prevent friction
4. Osteonecrosis:
1. After open reduction and internal fixation, with
extensive soft tissue dissection
5. Ulnar neuropathy:
1. Early, related to trauma
2. More commonly, late, related to the
development of angular deformities or scarring.
3. Symptoms may be addressed with ulnar nerve
transposition.
Intercondylar fractures
• 2nd common distal humerus
fractures in adults (1st=
extraarticular # distal humerus)
• T or Y shape of fracture line
• Comminution common
Mechanism of injury
• Fall on elbow driving olecranon into distal humerus
splitting the two condyles due to the action of the
flexors (medially ) and extensors (laterally) and
rotation around the horizontal axis
Classification
Treatment
• Nonoperative Management
• Nondisplaced fractures,
• Elderly patients with displaced fractures
• Severe osteopenia and comminution
• Patients with significant comorbid conditions
precluding operative management.
• Cast immobilization:
• Not preferred due to inadequate fracture reduction
and prolonged immobilization.
• “Bag of bones”:
• The arm is placed in a collar and cuff with as much
flexion as possible after initial reduction is attempted;
gravity traction helps effect reduction. The idea is to
obtain a painless “pseudarthrosis,” which allows for
motion.
Operative management
• Preferred treatment
• Aim to restore joint surfaces, columns
and tie arch Open reduction and
internal fixation
• Interfragmentary screws
• Dual plate fixation:
• one plate medially and another plate placed
posterolaterally
• 90 degrees from the medial plate or two
plates on either column
• 180 degrees from one another
• Total elbow arthroplasty (cemented,
semiconstrained):
• This may be considered in markedly
comminuted fractures and with fractures in
osteoporotic bone.
• Postoperative care: Early range of
motion of the elbow is essential unless
fixation is tenuous
Complications
• Posttraumatic arthritis:
• articular injury at time of trauma
• failure to restore articular congruity.
• Failure of fixation:
• Loss of motion (extension):
• With prolonged periods of immobilization.
• Range of motion exercises should be instituted as soon as the patient is able to tolerate therapy,
• Heterotopic bone
• Neurologic injury (up to 15%): The ulnar nerve is most commonly injured during surgical
• exposure.
• Nonunion of osteotomy: 5% to 15%
• Infection
 Fractures around elbow lateral condyle and intercondylar fractures

Fractures around elbow lateral condyle and intercondylar fractures

  • 1.
    Fractures around theelbow (Lateral condyle fractures and intercondylar fractures) Dr Siddhartha Sinha, Assistant Professor Department of Orthopaedics HIMSR and HAHC hospital, New Delhi
  • 2.
    Anatomy • Hinge jointwith articulation between • Lower end of the humerus with ulna (humero-ulnar joint) • Head of the radius (humero-radial joint). • Distal humerus is enlarged to form • Trochlea medially, Medial to the trochlea is a prominent process - medial epicondyle • Capitulum laterally, :Lateral to the capitulum is the lateral epicondyle.
  • 5.
    Three bony pointsrelationship • 3 Points • Medial epicondyle, • Lateral epicondyle • Tip of the olecranon • Extension = straight line • Flexion = isosceles triangle • Deranged in • Elbow dislocation • Lateral condyle/ Medial epiondyle # • Intercondylar # elbow (increased base) • Maintained in • Supracondylar fractures • 4th point: Head of radius (palpate in semi flexed elbow in pronation and supination)
  • 6.
    Carrying Angle • Angleformed between arm and forearm on full extension and supination • 11° in males • 14° in females • Evolution so that upper limb can clear body when carrying loads.
  • 7.
    Carrying angle • Increased= Cubitus valgus • Decreased = Cubitus Varus
  • 9.
    Paediatric elbow • Upperextremity fractures 65-75% of all paeditric traumas due to tendency of children to fall on oustretched hand. • Distal humerus # -86% of all elbow # in children • Supracondylar # - Most common • Lateral condyle # • Medial epicondyle # • Physis may be confused for a fracture in children • Good clinical examination • Radiographs of bilateral elbow for comparison
  • 10.
    Ossification around elbow •A) CRMTOL: Mnemonic for the appearance of the ossification centers around the elbow • Capitellum: 6 months to 2 years; includes the lateral crista of the trochlea • Radial head: 4 years • Medial epicondyle: 6 to 7 years • Trochlea: 8 years • Olecranon: 8 to 10 years; often multiple centers, which ultimately fuse • Lateral epicondyle: 12 years • B) Age of fusion of ossification centers
  • 11.
    Radiography of paediatricelbow • Standard AP view • Baumanns angle: the angulation of the physeal line between the lateral condyle and the distal humeral metaphysis. • Humeral- ulnar angle –true carrying angle • Metaphyseal –diaphyseal angle • Special view- • Jones view • Internal and external rotation views
  • 12.
    • Lateral view •Tear drop • Shaft condylar angle • Anterior Humeral line • Coronoid line • Lateral Humerocapitellar angle • Fat pad signs • Olecranon (posterior) • Coronoid (anterior) • Supinator
  • 13.
    Lateral condyle Fractures •17% of all distal humeral fractures in children • Peak age 6yrs • Fracture of necessity- must be fixed as it often leads to non union • Often result in less satisfactory outcomes than supracondylar fractures because: • Diagnosis less obvious and may be missed in subtle cases. • Loss of motion is more severe due to intra-articular nature. • The incidence of growth disturbance is higher
  • 14.
    Anatomy of lateralcondyle fractures • Anatomy • The ossification center of the lateral condyle extends to the lateral crista of the trochlea. • Typically accompanied by a soft tissue disruption • origins of the extensor carpi radialis longus and the brachioradialis muscles • remain attached to the free distal fragment, accounting for initial and late displacement of the fracture. • Disruption of the lateral crista of the trochlea (Milch type II fractures) results in posterolateral subluxation of the proximal radius and ulna with consequent cubitus valgus
  • 15.
    Mechanism of injury •“Pull-off” theory: Avulsion injury occurs by the common extensor origin owing to a varus stress exerted on the extended elbow. • “Push-off” theory: A fall onto an extended upper extremity results in axial load transmitted through the forearm, causing the radial head to impinge on the lateral condyle.
  • 16.
    Clinical evaluation • Pain •Swelling • Tenderness to palpation • Crepitus • Painful range of motion • Pain on resisted wrist extension
  • 17.
    Radiographic Evaluation • AP,lateral, and oblique views of the elbow • Varus stress views may accentuate displacement of the fracture. • Radiological D/D: • Lateral condyle fracture • Fracture of the entire distal humeral physis • Arthrogram: assess relationship of lateral condyle to proximal radius and distinguish from complete distal humeral physeal fracture • MRI – • Appreciate the direction of the fracture line and the pattern of fracture. • Not routinely done
  • 18.
    Classification of lateralcondyle fractures • Milch • Type I • The fracture line courses lateral to the trochlea and into the capitellar–trochlear groove. • Salter-Harris type IV fracture: the elbow is stable because the trochlea is intact • Less common. • Type II: • The fracture line extends into the apex of the trochlea. • Salter-Harris type II fracture • Elbow is unstable because the trochlea is disrupted; • More common
  • 19.
    Classification • Stages ofdisplacement (Jakob et al) • Stage 1: Fracture relatively non displaced, articular surface intact, trochlea intact, no lateral shift of olecranon • Stage 2: Fracture extends completely through the articular surface, proximal fragment displaced, lateral shift of olecranon • Stage 3 condylar fragment rotated, displaced laterally and proximally, translocation of olecranon and radial head.
  • 20.
    Treatment • Non operative •Non-displaced or minimally displaced fractures (Jakob stage I; <2 mm) • Simple immobilization in a posterior splint or long arm cast with the forearm in neutral position and the elbow flexed to 90 degrees • This is maintained for 3 to 6 weeks until there is healing of the fracture, after which range-of-motion exercises are instituted.
  • 21.
    • Closed reduction •Varus force as well as supination and extension may be attempted • Jakob type II fractures. • If articular reduction is achieved hold with percutaneous wires in order to prevent displacement. • An arthrogram can be performed to ensure a reduction was achieved. • Closed reduction is often difficult because of medial soft tissue swelling • Not routinely done
  • 22.
    • Open Reduction •Stages II and III fractures. • Open reduction using lateral approach and fixation with K wires • Postoperative immobilization -long arm casting/slab with the forearm in neutral rotation and the elbow flexed to 90 degrees for 3 to 4 weeks • After 3-4 weeks pins and the cast may be discontinued and active range-of- motion exercises instituted. • If treatment is delayed (>3 to 6 weeks) • closed treatment regardless of displacement, • High incidence of osteonecrosis of the trochlea and significant joint stiffness from extensive dissection with late open reduction
  • 23.
    Complications of lateralcondyle fractures 1. Nonunion: • Wide displacement of fragment and soft tissue interposition • “ Pull of extensors” attached to fragment • Treatment: Early cases- ORIF, Late cases- Manage consequences like deformity and instability
  • 24.
    • Angular deformity: •Cubitus valgus may result from overgrowth of the medial condyle. • Treatment of cubitus valgus: • Mild – no t/t • Moderate to severe deformity- supracondylar osteotomy
  • 25.
    3. Late ulnarnerve palsy (tardy Ulnar nerve palsy) due to cubitus valgus (late complicaition) 1. C/o tingling and numbness in the distribution of ulnar nerve 2. T/t : Anterior transposition of ulnar nerve in front of the medial epicondyle to prevent friction 4. Osteonecrosis: 1. After open reduction and internal fixation, with extensive soft tissue dissection 5. Ulnar neuropathy: 1. Early, related to trauma 2. More commonly, late, related to the development of angular deformities or scarring. 3. Symptoms may be addressed with ulnar nerve transposition.
  • 26.
    Intercondylar fractures • 2ndcommon distal humerus fractures in adults (1st= extraarticular # distal humerus) • T or Y shape of fracture line • Comminution common
  • 27.
    Mechanism of injury •Fall on elbow driving olecranon into distal humerus splitting the two condyles due to the action of the flexors (medially ) and extensors (laterally) and rotation around the horizontal axis
  • 28.
  • 29.
    Treatment • Nonoperative Management •Nondisplaced fractures, • Elderly patients with displaced fractures • Severe osteopenia and comminution • Patients with significant comorbid conditions precluding operative management. • Cast immobilization: • Not preferred due to inadequate fracture reduction and prolonged immobilization. • “Bag of bones”: • The arm is placed in a collar and cuff with as much flexion as possible after initial reduction is attempted; gravity traction helps effect reduction. The idea is to obtain a painless “pseudarthrosis,” which allows for motion.
  • 30.
    Operative management • Preferredtreatment • Aim to restore joint surfaces, columns and tie arch Open reduction and internal fixation • Interfragmentary screws • Dual plate fixation: • one plate medially and another plate placed posterolaterally • 90 degrees from the medial plate or two plates on either column • 180 degrees from one another • Total elbow arthroplasty (cemented, semiconstrained): • This may be considered in markedly comminuted fractures and with fractures in osteoporotic bone. • Postoperative care: Early range of motion of the elbow is essential unless fixation is tenuous
  • 31.
    Complications • Posttraumatic arthritis: •articular injury at time of trauma • failure to restore articular congruity. • Failure of fixation: • Loss of motion (extension): • With prolonged periods of immobilization. • Range of motion exercises should be instituted as soon as the patient is able to tolerate therapy, • Heterotopic bone • Neurologic injury (up to 15%): The ulnar nerve is most commonly injured during surgical • exposure. • Nonunion of osteotomy: 5% to 15% • Infection