GLOBALLY HARMONIZED SYSTEM OF CLASSIFICATION AND LABELING OF CHEMICALS (GHS) David Wallace, CIH Utah ASSE January 14, 2010
Outline GHS overview OSHA’s GHS activity Proposed changes to the Hazard Communication Standard Effect on Safety professionals
Introduction In 1985, one of my jobs as a “young” Safety Professional was helping my employer comply with OSHA’s new Hazard Communication standard, 1910.1200. Now, it looks like we will need to do it again!
GHS Overview “ Globally Harmonized System Of Classification And Labeling Of Chemicals” United Nations guidance for a uniform (harmonized) hazard communication system Based on ”major” existing systems USA  and Canadian systems for the workplace, workplace, consumers and pesticides  European Union directives for classification and labeling of substances and preparations United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods.
GHS Overview Elements Harmonized  criteria for   classifying  substances and mixtures according to their health, environmental and physical hazards Harmonized hazard communication elements, including requirements for  labeling and safety data sheets .
GHS Overview Justification Label requirements differ, requiring multiple labels for the same product Hazard definitions are not consistent Toxicity, Flammability  Globally over 100 diverse hazard communication regulations for their products globally Regulatory compliance is complex and costly Barrier to international trade in chemicals
Flammability example
GHS Overview Key Guiding Principles of the Harmonization Process Protection will not be reduced Will be based on intrinsic properties (hazards) of chemicals All types of chemicals will be covered All systems will have to be changed Involvement of all stakeholders should be ensured Comprehensibility must be addressed
GHS Hazard Classification Defined criteria are used to assign a hazard classification  Physical Hazards 16 categories Health Hazards 10 categories Environmental Hazards Mixtures  GHS classification guidance for when chemicals are mixed
GHS Hazard Classification Physical Hazards Explosives Flammable Gases Flammable Aerosols Oxidizing Gases Gases Under Pressure Flammable Liquids Flammable Solids Self-Reactive Substances Pyrophoric Liquids Pyrophoric Solids Self-Heating Substances Substances which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Oxidizing Liquids Oxidizing Solids Organic Peroxides Corrosive to Metals
GHS Hazard Classification Health Hazards Acute Toxicity Skin Corrosion/Irritation Serous Eye Damage/Eye Irritation Respiratory or Skin Sensitization Germ Cell Mutagenicity Carcinogenicity Reproductive Toxicology Target Organ Systemic Toxicity – Single Exposure Target Organ Systemic Toxicity – Repeated Exposure Aspiration Toxicity
GHS Hazard Classification Hazardous to the Aquatic Environment Acute aquatic toxicity Chronic aquatic toxicity Bioaccumulation potential Rapid degradability
GHS Hazard Communication Labels Symbols (hazard pictograms) Examples: Signal Words “ Danger” or “Warning”  Hazard Statements Example:  “Toxic if swallowed” Other Precautions, identification, supplier, supplemental
GHS label example
GHS Hazard Communication GHS Safety Data Sheet (SDS) 16 headings Similar to ISO, EU, and ANSI MSDS/SDS requirements
OSHA MSDS Format (old) OSHA-174 (1989), 8 sections (non-mandatory) Manufacturer information Hazard Ingredients/Identity Information  Physical/chemical properties Fire and Explosion Hazard Data  Reactivity Data  Health Hazard Data  Precautions for Safe Handling and Use  Control Measures
ANSI MSDS Format ANSI Z400.1-2004 Product and Company Identification  Hazard Identification Composition / Information On Ingredients First Aid Measures  Fire Fighting Measures  Accidental Release Measures  Handling and Storage   Exposure Control / Personal Protection  Physical and Chemical Properties  Stability and Reactivity  Toxicological Information  Ecological Information  Disposal Considerations  Transport Information Regulatory Information  Other Information
OSHA and the GHS Rulemaking Steps ANPR-  Sept. 12, 2006 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking –  Sept. 30, 2009 Public Comment Period – ended  Dec. 29. 2009 Public Hearing – (Notice published Dec. 29, 2009) March and April, 2010 for Washington, Pittsburgh and Los Angeles Post-hearing Comment Period Final Standard Phase-in Period for Compliance
Proposed OSHA Rule Major changes to the Hazard Communication Standards Changed “hazard determination” to “hazard classification”  Changed “MSDS” to “SDS” Changed definitions to comply with GHS Labels  for shipped containers  required to have GHS information Workplace labels may be GHS labels,  or  other labels that identify the material and hazard Safety Data Sheets with 16-sections May include guidance for transportation information  and environmental hazards
Proposed OSHA Rule Major changes to the Hazard Communication Standards (cont.) Other OSHA standards are changed where applicable New wording on warning signs for asbestos and other health hazards Changes to standards for HAZWOPER, Combustible and Flammable Liquids, Welding Cutting and Brazing, etc.
Proposed OSHA Rule Effective dates Two years after final rule Employee training on new labels and safety data sheets Three years after final rule Chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors, and employers in compliance with all modified provisions
Proposed OSHA Rule Costs and benefits $97 million annual cost  training, SDSs & labels, management $851 million annual benefit  reduced injuries/illnesses/fatalities, improved productivity and cost reduction $754 million net annual benefit
OSHA interpretation GHS labels comply with current OSHA requirements Standard Interpretations 10/06/2009 - Using the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) to Comply with OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=27218
Comments on the proposed rule OSHA specifically solicited comments about: Costs and benefits Effect on “small entities”  GHS classification system Combustible dusts and Simple asphyxiants Color labels vs. B&W PELs on data sheets Etc. 475 items in the docket (12/29/09)
ASSE’s Comment “ ASSE applauds OSHA for its leadership in undertaking this rulemaking and urges that every possible step be taken to achieve a final rule as soon as practicable.” However, ASSE has some concerns: OSHA should include “control banding” OSHA underestimated the impact on small business Some hazard classifications should be modified OSHA should require red borders on labels Labels should have more required information Exposure limits should be listed on data sheets The new standard should have a shorter deadline for training There may be a shortage of SH&E professional on staff Etc.
Online news magazine features GHS “ As the United States creeps closer to adopting the Globally Harmonized Hazard Communication System (GHS), companies must be prepared to comply with the new provisions.”  http://ehstoday.com/fire_emergencyresponse/hazardous-materials/ghs-power-one/
Effect on Safety Professionals Become familiar with the new system Collect new SDSs as provided by suppliers and incorporate them into the existing MSDS system (or use commercial service) New GHS labels for “shipped containers” Employers can use other systems for workplace labeling Train employees on new labels and SDS
Resources GHS Websites OSHA,  http://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/global.html   EPA,  http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/international/globalharmon.htm   DOT  http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/hazmat/regs/international   CSPC,  http://www.cpsc.gov/phth/GHSpolicy.html   UN,  http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev02/02files_e.html   Government Printing Office http://www.gpoaccess.gov/   OSHA comments Docket No. OSHA-H022K- 2006-0062 at  http:// www.regulations.gov

Ghs Update 2009

  • 1.
    GLOBALLY HARMONIZED SYSTEMOF CLASSIFICATION AND LABELING OF CHEMICALS (GHS) David Wallace, CIH Utah ASSE January 14, 2010
  • 2.
    Outline GHS overviewOSHA’s GHS activity Proposed changes to the Hazard Communication Standard Effect on Safety professionals
  • 3.
    Introduction In 1985,one of my jobs as a “young” Safety Professional was helping my employer comply with OSHA’s new Hazard Communication standard, 1910.1200. Now, it looks like we will need to do it again!
  • 4.
    GHS Overview “Globally Harmonized System Of Classification And Labeling Of Chemicals” United Nations guidance for a uniform (harmonized) hazard communication system Based on ”major” existing systems USA and Canadian systems for the workplace, workplace, consumers and pesticides European Union directives for classification and labeling of substances and preparations United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods.
  • 5.
    GHS Overview ElementsHarmonized criteria for classifying substances and mixtures according to their health, environmental and physical hazards Harmonized hazard communication elements, including requirements for labeling and safety data sheets .
  • 6.
    GHS Overview JustificationLabel requirements differ, requiring multiple labels for the same product Hazard definitions are not consistent Toxicity, Flammability Globally over 100 diverse hazard communication regulations for their products globally Regulatory compliance is complex and costly Barrier to international trade in chemicals
  • 7.
  • 8.
    GHS Overview KeyGuiding Principles of the Harmonization Process Protection will not be reduced Will be based on intrinsic properties (hazards) of chemicals All types of chemicals will be covered All systems will have to be changed Involvement of all stakeholders should be ensured Comprehensibility must be addressed
  • 9.
    GHS Hazard ClassificationDefined criteria are used to assign a hazard classification Physical Hazards 16 categories Health Hazards 10 categories Environmental Hazards Mixtures GHS classification guidance for when chemicals are mixed
  • 10.
    GHS Hazard ClassificationPhysical Hazards Explosives Flammable Gases Flammable Aerosols Oxidizing Gases Gases Under Pressure Flammable Liquids Flammable Solids Self-Reactive Substances Pyrophoric Liquids Pyrophoric Solids Self-Heating Substances Substances which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Oxidizing Liquids Oxidizing Solids Organic Peroxides Corrosive to Metals
  • 11.
    GHS Hazard ClassificationHealth Hazards Acute Toxicity Skin Corrosion/Irritation Serous Eye Damage/Eye Irritation Respiratory or Skin Sensitization Germ Cell Mutagenicity Carcinogenicity Reproductive Toxicology Target Organ Systemic Toxicity – Single Exposure Target Organ Systemic Toxicity – Repeated Exposure Aspiration Toxicity
  • 12.
    GHS Hazard ClassificationHazardous to the Aquatic Environment Acute aquatic toxicity Chronic aquatic toxicity Bioaccumulation potential Rapid degradability
  • 13.
    GHS Hazard CommunicationLabels Symbols (hazard pictograms) Examples: Signal Words “ Danger” or “Warning” Hazard Statements Example: “Toxic if swallowed” Other Precautions, identification, supplier, supplemental
  • 14.
  • 15.
    GHS Hazard CommunicationGHS Safety Data Sheet (SDS) 16 headings Similar to ISO, EU, and ANSI MSDS/SDS requirements
  • 16.
    OSHA MSDS Format(old) OSHA-174 (1989), 8 sections (non-mandatory) Manufacturer information Hazard Ingredients/Identity Information Physical/chemical properties Fire and Explosion Hazard Data Reactivity Data Health Hazard Data Precautions for Safe Handling and Use Control Measures
  • 17.
    ANSI MSDS FormatANSI Z400.1-2004 Product and Company Identification Hazard Identification Composition / Information On Ingredients First Aid Measures Fire Fighting Measures Accidental Release Measures Handling and Storage Exposure Control / Personal Protection Physical and Chemical Properties Stability and Reactivity Toxicological Information Ecological Information Disposal Considerations Transport Information Regulatory Information Other Information
  • 18.
    OSHA and theGHS Rulemaking Steps ANPR- Sept. 12, 2006 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking – Sept. 30, 2009 Public Comment Period – ended Dec. 29. 2009 Public Hearing – (Notice published Dec. 29, 2009) March and April, 2010 for Washington, Pittsburgh and Los Angeles Post-hearing Comment Period Final Standard Phase-in Period for Compliance
  • 19.
    Proposed OSHA RuleMajor changes to the Hazard Communication Standards Changed “hazard determination” to “hazard classification” Changed “MSDS” to “SDS” Changed definitions to comply with GHS Labels for shipped containers required to have GHS information Workplace labels may be GHS labels, or other labels that identify the material and hazard Safety Data Sheets with 16-sections May include guidance for transportation information and environmental hazards
  • 20.
    Proposed OSHA RuleMajor changes to the Hazard Communication Standards (cont.) Other OSHA standards are changed where applicable New wording on warning signs for asbestos and other health hazards Changes to standards for HAZWOPER, Combustible and Flammable Liquids, Welding Cutting and Brazing, etc.
  • 21.
    Proposed OSHA RuleEffective dates Two years after final rule Employee training on new labels and safety data sheets Three years after final rule Chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors, and employers in compliance with all modified provisions
  • 22.
    Proposed OSHA RuleCosts and benefits $97 million annual cost training, SDSs & labels, management $851 million annual benefit reduced injuries/illnesses/fatalities, improved productivity and cost reduction $754 million net annual benefit
  • 23.
    OSHA interpretation GHSlabels comply with current OSHA requirements Standard Interpretations 10/06/2009 - Using the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) to Comply with OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=27218
  • 24.
    Comments on theproposed rule OSHA specifically solicited comments about: Costs and benefits Effect on “small entities” GHS classification system Combustible dusts and Simple asphyxiants Color labels vs. B&W PELs on data sheets Etc. 475 items in the docket (12/29/09)
  • 25.
    ASSE’s Comment “ASSE applauds OSHA for its leadership in undertaking this rulemaking and urges that every possible step be taken to achieve a final rule as soon as practicable.” However, ASSE has some concerns: OSHA should include “control banding” OSHA underestimated the impact on small business Some hazard classifications should be modified OSHA should require red borders on labels Labels should have more required information Exposure limits should be listed on data sheets The new standard should have a shorter deadline for training There may be a shortage of SH&E professional on staff Etc.
  • 26.
    Online news magazinefeatures GHS “ As the United States creeps closer to adopting the Globally Harmonized Hazard Communication System (GHS), companies must be prepared to comply with the new provisions.” http://ehstoday.com/fire_emergencyresponse/hazardous-materials/ghs-power-one/
  • 27.
    Effect on SafetyProfessionals Become familiar with the new system Collect new SDSs as provided by suppliers and incorporate them into the existing MSDS system (or use commercial service) New GHS labels for “shipped containers” Employers can use other systems for workplace labeling Train employees on new labels and SDS
  • 28.
    Resources GHS WebsitesOSHA, http://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/global.html EPA, http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/international/globalharmon.htm DOT http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/hazmat/regs/international CSPC, http://www.cpsc.gov/phth/GHSpolicy.html UN, http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev02/02files_e.html Government Printing Office http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ OSHA comments Docket No. OSHA-H022K- 2006-0062 at http:// www.regulations.gov