THE GLOBAL MARKETING
STRATEGY
A broad Conceptualization of GMS and its effect on firm performance
Journal Review, Presented by:
Danny Darmawan Kosasih
Retno Nuramini Hartawati
2
Problem Identification
1. What constitutes a global marketing
strategy?
2. Does GMS affect a firm’s global market
performance?
GMS Affects GMP
3
Background
Lack of empirical support in proving the
effect of Global Marketing Strategy to
Global Marketing Performance
4
Purpose of The Research
1. To develop abroad conceptualization of
GMS
2. To attempt in substantiating the
fundamental relationship between GMS
and a firm performance
5
Outline
Five major section:
1. A Brief review of the Global Marketing literature
2. A New conceptualization of the GMS
3. A Conceptual model that links the GMS to its
antecedents and effect and advance the related
research hypotheses
4. The research design and methodology of the study and
the result of the empirical analysis.
5. Major findings, theoretical and managerial implications.
6
 Standardization
 Configuration – Coordination
 Integration
1. Major Perspective of GMS
7
Perspective Basic Logic Key variables Antecedents Effects
Standardizati
on
perspective
 Scale
economics
 Low-cost
 Simplification
Product, promotion,
channel structure,
price standardization
 Convergence of
culture
 Similarity of
demand
 Low trade
barriers
 Technological
advances
 Orientation of
firm
 Efficiency
 Consistenc
y
 Transfer of
ideas
1. Major Perspective of GMS
8
Perspective Basic Logic Key variables Antecedents Effects
Configuration-
coordination
perspective
 Comparative
advantage
 Interdependency
 Specialization
 Concentration of
value-chain
activities
 Coordination of
value-chain
activities
 Low trade
barriers
 Technological
advance
 Orientation of
firm
 International
experience
 Efficiency
 Synergies
1. Major Perspective of GMS
9
Perspective Basic Logic Key variables Antecedents Effects
Integration
perspective
 Cross-
subsidization
 Competitive
dislocation
 Rationalization
 Integration of
competitive
moves
 Global market
participation
 Low trade barriers
 Orientation of firm
 International
experience
 Integrated markets
 Effectiveness
in competition
 Competitive
leverage
1. Major Perspective of GMS
10
THE GMSProduct
Standardization
Promotion
Standardization
Standardized
Price
Standardized
Channel
Structure
Concentration
Of Marketing
Activities
Coordination
Of Marketing
Activities
Global
Market
Participation
Integration of
Competitive
Moves
2. A Broad Conceptualization of
GMS
11
Product Standardization:
The degree to which a product is standardized across country
market
Promotion Standardization:
The degree to which the same promotional mix is executed
across country markets.
Standardized channel structure:
The degree to which the firm uses the same channel
structure across country markets.
2. A Broad Conceptualization of
GMS
12
Standardized price:
The degree to which the firm uses the same price across country
markets.
Concentration of marketing activities:
The extent to which a firm’s marketing activities, including
development of promotional campaign, pricing decision,
distribution activities and after-sale services, are deliberately
performed in a single or a few country market
Standardized channel structure:
The extent to which a firm’s marketing activities in different country
locations, including development of promotional campaign, pricing
decision, distribution activities and after-sale services, are planned
and executed interdependently on a global scale
2. A Broad Conceptualization of
GMS
13
Global market participation:
The extent to which a firm pursues marketing operations in all
major markets in the world.
Integration of competitive moves:
The extent to which a firm’s competitive marketing moves in
different markets in the world.
2. A Broad Conceptualization of
GMS
14
 Theoretical Foundations
 A Structural Model of the GMS
 Model Components and Hypotheses
3. A Model of the GMS and Firm
Performance
15
Two Theoretical foundations are:
1. The industrial organizational theory focuses on
the external market to identify drivers of a firm’s strategy
and contends that the firm’s performance is determined
by its strategy.
2. The resource based view theory uses the firm’s
internal organizational resources to explain its strategy
and performance
3. A Model of the GMS and Firm
Performance
16
International
experience
Global
Orientation
External
Globalizing
Conditions
The GMS
Global
Strategic
Performance
Global
Financial
Performance
A Structural Model of the GMS
3. A Model of the GMS and Firm
Performance
19
 Sampling Frame : mail surveys to
business units within 23 global industries
 Instrument Development
 Measurement of the Constructs
 Data collection
 Assessment of Non-response Bias
4. Research Methodology
28
 The second-order CFA
 Test of the Structural Path Model
5. Analysis & Findings
31
5. Analysis & Findings
International
experience
Global
Orientation
External
Globalizing
Conditions
The GMS
Global
Strategic
Performance
Global
Financial
Performance
Fitted Structural Model of the GMS
* .05
* .01
* .01
* .01
* .01
* .01
* .05
32
 The GMS
 The Effect of the GMS on Performance
 Drivers of the GMS
 The Effect of International Experience on
Performance
 Managerial Implications
 Further Research
6. Conclusion
33
The GMS
As a broad conceptualization of global marketing strategy that
incorporates all three perspectives
 The GMS scale is shown to be related to a firm’s global market
performance, the external globalizing conditions, and the firm’s global
orientation and international experience.
 The GMS serves as a foundation for integrating previous research
finding and the differences.
 The GMS reflects an entire set of a firm’s marketing action, all
within the control of management.
6. Conclusion
34
The Effect of the GMS on Performance
 Has a positive and significant effect on a firm’s
global market performance
 Influence firm’s strategic performance positively in
global market, is found to affect a firm’s global financial
performance, both directly and indirectly through its effect
on the firm’s global strategic performance.
6. Conclusion
35
Drivers of the GMS
 External globalizing conditions
 global orientation
 international experience.
These findings are consistent with both the IO framework
and the RBV literature.
6. Conclusion
36
The Effect of International Experience on
Performance
Found that a firm’s global strategic performance is
influenced positively by the international experience.
This is consistent with the previous finding that international
experience is a valuable organizational resource and an
important determinant of success in international Market.
In terms of managerial practice, the findings indicate that it pays
to promote constant accumulation organization wide
international experience and also the firm will be able to
attain a stronger global strategic position, which
eventually will lead to improved global financial performance.
6. Conclusion
37
Managerial Implications:
Standardized product will provide the firm with
substantial efficiency in the global operations and a
standardized strategy will render scale economics, synergies
and efficiencies, and also will simplify worldwide planning and
afford the firm’s brands a consistent image with global customers.
6. Conclusion
38
Further Research
1. To Direct more resources to data collection to increase the
sample size and consider other types of firms or industries.
2. Consider adopting a longitudinal design to further test the
causal order of the factors.
3. To test the applicability of the GMS in other countries.
4. To explore the relevance of other external and internal factors
for a firm’s global marketing strategy and performance.
6. Conclusion

Global marketing strategy

  • 1.
    THE GLOBAL MARKETING STRATEGY Abroad Conceptualization of GMS and its effect on firm performance Journal Review, Presented by: Danny Darmawan Kosasih Retno Nuramini Hartawati
  • 2.
    2 Problem Identification 1. Whatconstitutes a global marketing strategy? 2. Does GMS affect a firm’s global market performance? GMS Affects GMP
  • 3.
    3 Background Lack of empiricalsupport in proving the effect of Global Marketing Strategy to Global Marketing Performance
  • 4.
    4 Purpose of TheResearch 1. To develop abroad conceptualization of GMS 2. To attempt in substantiating the fundamental relationship between GMS and a firm performance
  • 5.
    5 Outline Five major section: 1.A Brief review of the Global Marketing literature 2. A New conceptualization of the GMS 3. A Conceptual model that links the GMS to its antecedents and effect and advance the related research hypotheses 4. The research design and methodology of the study and the result of the empirical analysis. 5. Major findings, theoretical and managerial implications.
  • 6.
    6  Standardization  Configuration– Coordination  Integration 1. Major Perspective of GMS
  • 7.
    7 Perspective Basic LogicKey variables Antecedents Effects Standardizati on perspective  Scale economics  Low-cost  Simplification Product, promotion, channel structure, price standardization  Convergence of culture  Similarity of demand  Low trade barriers  Technological advances  Orientation of firm  Efficiency  Consistenc y  Transfer of ideas 1. Major Perspective of GMS
  • 8.
    8 Perspective Basic LogicKey variables Antecedents Effects Configuration- coordination perspective  Comparative advantage  Interdependency  Specialization  Concentration of value-chain activities  Coordination of value-chain activities  Low trade barriers  Technological advance  Orientation of firm  International experience  Efficiency  Synergies 1. Major Perspective of GMS
  • 9.
    9 Perspective Basic LogicKey variables Antecedents Effects Integration perspective  Cross- subsidization  Competitive dislocation  Rationalization  Integration of competitive moves  Global market participation  Low trade barriers  Orientation of firm  International experience  Integrated markets  Effectiveness in competition  Competitive leverage 1. Major Perspective of GMS
  • 10.
    10 THE GMSProduct Standardization Promotion Standardization Standardized Price Standardized Channel Structure Concentration Of Marketing Activities Coordination OfMarketing Activities Global Market Participation Integration of Competitive Moves 2. A Broad Conceptualization of GMS
  • 11.
    11 Product Standardization: The degreeto which a product is standardized across country market Promotion Standardization: The degree to which the same promotional mix is executed across country markets. Standardized channel structure: The degree to which the firm uses the same channel structure across country markets. 2. A Broad Conceptualization of GMS
  • 12.
    12 Standardized price: The degreeto which the firm uses the same price across country markets. Concentration of marketing activities: The extent to which a firm’s marketing activities, including development of promotional campaign, pricing decision, distribution activities and after-sale services, are deliberately performed in a single or a few country market Standardized channel structure: The extent to which a firm’s marketing activities in different country locations, including development of promotional campaign, pricing decision, distribution activities and after-sale services, are planned and executed interdependently on a global scale 2. A Broad Conceptualization of GMS
  • 13.
    13 Global market participation: Theextent to which a firm pursues marketing operations in all major markets in the world. Integration of competitive moves: The extent to which a firm’s competitive marketing moves in different markets in the world. 2. A Broad Conceptualization of GMS
  • 14.
    14  Theoretical Foundations A Structural Model of the GMS  Model Components and Hypotheses 3. A Model of the GMS and Firm Performance
  • 15.
    15 Two Theoretical foundationsare: 1. The industrial organizational theory focuses on the external market to identify drivers of a firm’s strategy and contends that the firm’s performance is determined by its strategy. 2. The resource based view theory uses the firm’s internal organizational resources to explain its strategy and performance 3. A Model of the GMS and Firm Performance
  • 16.
  • 17.
    19  Sampling Frame: mail surveys to business units within 23 global industries  Instrument Development  Measurement of the Constructs  Data collection  Assessment of Non-response Bias 4. Research Methodology
  • 18.
    28  The second-orderCFA  Test of the Structural Path Model 5. Analysis & Findings
  • 19.
    31 5. Analysis &Findings International experience Global Orientation External Globalizing Conditions The GMS Global Strategic Performance Global Financial Performance Fitted Structural Model of the GMS * .05 * .01 * .01 * .01 * .01 * .01 * .05
  • 20.
    32  The GMS The Effect of the GMS on Performance  Drivers of the GMS  The Effect of International Experience on Performance  Managerial Implications  Further Research 6. Conclusion
  • 21.
    33 The GMS As abroad conceptualization of global marketing strategy that incorporates all three perspectives  The GMS scale is shown to be related to a firm’s global market performance, the external globalizing conditions, and the firm’s global orientation and international experience.  The GMS serves as a foundation for integrating previous research finding and the differences.  The GMS reflects an entire set of a firm’s marketing action, all within the control of management. 6. Conclusion
  • 22.
    34 The Effect ofthe GMS on Performance  Has a positive and significant effect on a firm’s global market performance  Influence firm’s strategic performance positively in global market, is found to affect a firm’s global financial performance, both directly and indirectly through its effect on the firm’s global strategic performance. 6. Conclusion
  • 23.
    35 Drivers of theGMS  External globalizing conditions  global orientation  international experience. These findings are consistent with both the IO framework and the RBV literature. 6. Conclusion
  • 24.
    36 The Effect ofInternational Experience on Performance Found that a firm’s global strategic performance is influenced positively by the international experience. This is consistent with the previous finding that international experience is a valuable organizational resource and an important determinant of success in international Market. In terms of managerial practice, the findings indicate that it pays to promote constant accumulation organization wide international experience and also the firm will be able to attain a stronger global strategic position, which eventually will lead to improved global financial performance. 6. Conclusion
  • 25.
    37 Managerial Implications: Standardized productwill provide the firm with substantial efficiency in the global operations and a standardized strategy will render scale economics, synergies and efficiencies, and also will simplify worldwide planning and afford the firm’s brands a consistent image with global customers. 6. Conclusion
  • 26.
    38 Further Research 1. ToDirect more resources to data collection to increase the sample size and consider other types of firms or industries. 2. Consider adopting a longitudinal design to further test the causal order of the factors. 3. To test the applicability of the GMS in other countries. 4. To explore the relevance of other external and internal factors for a firm’s global marketing strategy and performance. 6. Conclusion