FFT and Patient Insight for
Improvement
Small Steps โ€“ Big Changes
Presented by: Jean Tucker
@thejeantucker @gloshospitals
There is so much data -
Staff will say โ€˜thatโ€™s not my data/problemโ€™ and
so do nothing about the themes that emerge.
They see initiatives as being led from above
and not relevant โ€˜on the shop floorโ€™
โ€ข Making changes based on โ€˜traditionalโ€™
patient feedback is not something that the
staff can simply โ€˜doโ€™
โ€ข Examples of where patient experience
data is used to spark debate and actions
are rare
Is the feedback given to nurses from patients
on the ward valuable?
Is anecdotal feedback valuable?
Are staff suggestions valuable?
Issues that the staff identified from
observations or from talking to patients were
the same as what the data sets were telling
us.
โ€ข How could we get them to take ownership
of this feedback and empower them to
make small changes in real time to benefit
these patients.
Joint working between Patient Experience
Team whose expertise is understanding
data
and
Ward staff whose expertise lay in
understanding their patients and listening
to them
โžขListen to what mattered to the staff
โžขHear their ideas for improving their
experience of working on the ward and
โžขThen listen to their ideas for improving the
experience of their patients
โžขEmbed a culture of improvement for both
the staff and the patients
. Using post it notes, staff came
up with ideas that would
improve their experience.
These were anonymous but
needed to be detailed so โ€˜needs
more supportโ€™ had to be
expanded with examples before
we could action.
Ideas actioned as soon as
possible
We then asked for suggestions on how we
could improve the experience of patients
based on what they had observed and what
patients were telling them
.
Criteria
โ€ข No project was too small
โ€ข It did not matter where the โ€˜dataโ€™ originated
โ€ข No minimum numbers of beneficiaries
โ€ข All ideas considered with support to
introduce as many as possible
Lots of quick wins
โ€ข Several projects were quick to implement
and produced good results for the patients,
the staff and the Trust.
โ€ข Patients could see improvements being
made in real time
Intervention Background
Hearing aid boxes These were put in place as a result of complaints about hearing
aids being lost, staffโ€™s awareness of the distressing effects for
patients of losing a hearing aid and thus not being able to
communicate with the staff caring for them, as well as a wish to
save the Trust the considerable cost of replacing them.
Information boards The ward survey highlighted that patients werenโ€™t always given
enough information about their condition or treatment so
information boards have been created for three key conditions
that are common on the ward, with racks beside them to hold
information leaflets that patients and carers can take.
Intervention background
What matters to me tree The ward staff and some FFT comments identified
communication problems between patients and staff
and that patients were not able to find a staff member
to talk with about their worried and fears. The ward
set up a focus group to explore these issues in more
detail. Patients in the groups said they felt that
patientsโ€™ preferences and priorities varied widely.
The โ€˜what matters to meโ€™ tree invites patients, carers
and staff to write what matters to them on laminated
โ€˜leavesโ€™ that they stick to the tree. It was put in place to
capture the range of things that are important to
patients, carers and staff as well as to demonstrate that
the ward culture is one that is open to hearing about
patientsโ€™ wishes and needs with a desire to make
things better
โ€ข Its OK to Ask โ€“ a poster and badge
campaign encouraging patients to ask
questions about their care
โ€ข No formal measurement of individual
initiatives
โ€ข Staff encouraged to โ€˜just do itโ€™ and to
acquire the habit of making small changes
where they saw the opportunity without
having to adopt formal improvement
methodologies and measurements
Moving on
โ€ข We looked at the data from other sources
and with support, the team could identify
concerning trends which they put to the
staff for suggestions of how to improve
Focus groups Surveys
FFT Complaints
Benefits for the staff
โ€ข They feel able to influence care
โ€ข Make small steps of change
โ€ข Enjoy their work and socialise more โ€“
tombola/fundraising
โ€ข Have become a team and support each
other

Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust- Small steps big changes- PEN 2017

  • 1.
    FFT and PatientInsight for Improvement Small Steps โ€“ Big Changes Presented by: Jean Tucker @thejeantucker @gloshospitals
  • 2.
    There is somuch data -
  • 3.
    Staff will sayโ€˜thatโ€™s not my data/problemโ€™ and so do nothing about the themes that emerge. They see initiatives as being led from above and not relevant โ€˜on the shop floorโ€™
  • 4.
    โ€ข Making changesbased on โ€˜traditionalโ€™ patient feedback is not something that the staff can simply โ€˜doโ€™ โ€ข Examples of where patient experience data is used to spark debate and actions are rare
  • 5.
    Is the feedbackgiven to nurses from patients on the ward valuable? Is anecdotal feedback valuable? Are staff suggestions valuable?
  • 6.
    Issues that thestaff identified from observations or from talking to patients were the same as what the data sets were telling us.
  • 7.
    โ€ข How couldwe get them to take ownership of this feedback and empower them to make small changes in real time to benefit these patients.
  • 8.
    Joint working betweenPatient Experience Team whose expertise is understanding data and Ward staff whose expertise lay in understanding their patients and listening to them
  • 9.
    โžขListen to whatmattered to the staff โžขHear their ideas for improving their experience of working on the ward and โžขThen listen to their ideas for improving the experience of their patients โžขEmbed a culture of improvement for both the staff and the patients
  • 10.
    . Using postit notes, staff came up with ideas that would improve their experience. These were anonymous but needed to be detailed so โ€˜needs more supportโ€™ had to be expanded with examples before we could action. Ideas actioned as soon as possible
  • 11.
    We then askedfor suggestions on how we could improve the experience of patients based on what they had observed and what patients were telling them .
  • 12.
    Criteria โ€ข No projectwas too small โ€ข It did not matter where the โ€˜dataโ€™ originated โ€ข No minimum numbers of beneficiaries โ€ข All ideas considered with support to introduce as many as possible
  • 13.
    Lots of quickwins โ€ข Several projects were quick to implement and produced good results for the patients, the staff and the Trust. โ€ข Patients could see improvements being made in real time
  • 14.
    Intervention Background Hearing aidboxes These were put in place as a result of complaints about hearing aids being lost, staffโ€™s awareness of the distressing effects for patients of losing a hearing aid and thus not being able to communicate with the staff caring for them, as well as a wish to save the Trust the considerable cost of replacing them. Information boards The ward survey highlighted that patients werenโ€™t always given enough information about their condition or treatment so information boards have been created for three key conditions that are common on the ward, with racks beside them to hold information leaflets that patients and carers can take.
  • 15.
    Intervention background What mattersto me tree The ward staff and some FFT comments identified communication problems between patients and staff and that patients were not able to find a staff member to talk with about their worried and fears. The ward set up a focus group to explore these issues in more detail. Patients in the groups said they felt that patientsโ€™ preferences and priorities varied widely. The โ€˜what matters to meโ€™ tree invites patients, carers and staff to write what matters to them on laminated โ€˜leavesโ€™ that they stick to the tree. It was put in place to capture the range of things that are important to patients, carers and staff as well as to demonstrate that the ward culture is one that is open to hearing about patientsโ€™ wishes and needs with a desire to make things better
  • 16.
    โ€ข Its OKto Ask โ€“ a poster and badge campaign encouraging patients to ask questions about their care
  • 17.
    โ€ข No formalmeasurement of individual initiatives โ€ข Staff encouraged to โ€˜just do itโ€™ and to acquire the habit of making small changes where they saw the opportunity without having to adopt formal improvement methodologies and measurements
  • 18.
    Moving on โ€ข Welooked at the data from other sources and with support, the team could identify concerning trends which they put to the staff for suggestions of how to improve Focus groups Surveys FFT Complaints
  • 19.
    Benefits for thestaff โ€ข They feel able to influence care โ€ข Make small steps of change โ€ข Enjoy their work and socialise more โ€“ tombola/fundraising โ€ข Have become a team and support each other