GnRH Analogues
&
Addback Therapy
GnRH Agonist
 Produced by Modification of the native
GnRH decapeptide at 6 & 10 positions
 Glp-His-Trp-Ser-Tyr-Gly-Leu-Arg-Pro-Gly-
NH2 -LHRH
 Glp-His-Trp-Ser-Tyr-Ser(But )-Leu-Arg-
Pro-Azgly-NH2 - Goserelin
HISTORY:
 Discovered in 1971
 Introduced for medical use in 1980s
 Most widely used GnRH is leuprolide and
triptorelin.
 Non proprietary names usually end in-relin.
 100 times more potent than natural LHRH
 After initial agonistic action (flare response),
down-regulation & desensitization of the
pituitary: hypogonadotrophic, hypogonadal
state.
Mechanism
Within 12 h of administration:
Flare effect [lasting 24-48 h]
 5 fold increase of FSH
 10 fold rise in LH
 4 fold elevation in E2.
Effects of GnRHAgonist
Continuous administration
 Opposite effects: internalization of the agonist
/receptor complex & decrease in the number
of receptors (down-regulation).
 paradoxical suppression of the pituitary Gnt
synthesis & liberation (desensitization).
The decreased levels of FSH & LH:
 Arrest of follicular development
 Decrease in sex steroid levels to castrate
levels.
 Postmenopausal E2 levels are commonly
reached after 21 days.
The pituitary blockade persist during agonist
treatment but it is reversible after therapy.
LEUPROLIDE
Most commonly used GnRH agonist for
endometriosis
Two dosing options-11.25 mg once every 3 months
3.75mg
One in each month
 Endometriosis.
 Uterine fibroids.
 Thinning agent in DUB (prior to
endometrial ablation).
 Pituitary down-regulation (in long protocol
of IVF and induction of ovulation).
 Adenomyiosis
 Before & during chemotherapy for breast
cancer to preserve ovarian function
Indications
GnRHa
 An appropriate therapy of Chronic pelvic pain,
even in the absence of laparoscopic
confirmation of Endometriosis.
Provided that a detailed evaluation fails to
demonstrate other cause.
(ACOG Recommendations Grade (B)
Endometriosis
GnRHa with Hormone Therapy addback should
be considered as 2nd line treatment
No response to CHCs or progestins
Recurrence of symptoms after initial
improvement
(SOGC, 2010)
Indications
GnRHa alone: Symptoms of estrogen deficiency
 Hot flushes,
 Insomnia,
 Loss of libido,
 Vaginal dryness,
 Emotional instability, depression, headache
 Loss of Bone Mineral Density, which is not
always reversible
Side Effects
Aim: To prevent demineralization of bone &
menopausal symptoms.
GnRha should not be given as a single agent for
>6 months.
GnRHa should not be used for any length of
time in the absence of HT addback
(SOGC, 2010).
Addback Therapy
 There is a threshold serum estrogen
concentration that is
 low enough that endometriosis is not
stimulated
 high enough that hypoestrogenic symptoms
are prevented (Barbieri,1992)
 same as that achieved with physiologic HT
for menopausal women
Add-back Rationale
 GnRHa: Pain relief 85-100% persisting for 6-
12 months after cessation of treatment.
(Winkel et al,2005 )
 GnRHa Vs other hormonal treatment: No
difference with respect to pain relief or
reduction in E deposits (Cochrane library,
2005).
Efficacy
Leuprolide
Buserelin
Nafarelin
Histerelin
Goserelin
Deslorelin
Triptorelin
(Available as daily injections, depot preps, nasal
sprays, implants)
GnRHAgonist Preparations
Hormonal treatment that aims to reduce the proliferation
of endometrial cells is promising, but there is a paucity of
well-designed studies to guide treatment.
There is a strong need to develop pharmacological agents
that provide an efficient outcome (Farquhar et al, 2006).
Commonly employed “add back” regimens
are-
 Low dose combined estrogen and
progestrone
 Estrogen only
 Progestins alone
 Bisphosphonates
 Tibolone
 Raloxifen
Add-Back
 Synthetic steroid
 Estrogenic, progetogenic and androgenic
action
 Prevents loss of bone mineral density
 Prevents vasomotor symptoms
 Dose- 2.5mg for 3-6months with GnRHa
Tibolone
 Synthetic non steroidal drug as an add back
 Afferent to SERM
 Weak estrogenic action at CNS, CVS and
skeleton
 Weak anti estrogenic at reproductive
sites(uterus and breast)
Raloxifen
 Addback with GnRH agonist
 Decreases bone resorption
 Alendronate- 5mg/day
 Improves bone mineral density
Bisphosphonates
 Combined estrogen and progestin add back
therapy protect the bone and prevents hot flushes
and vaginal atrophy
 Ongoing research to identify other uses
 Antagonists with better tolerance need to be
explored
 Injudicious use is not advocated
 Clinicians should be made full aware to
realise the drugs full potential
 When used appropriately with full potential
it can be labelled as “wonder drug”.
Conclusion
GnRH analogues and addback therapy

GnRH analogues and addback therapy

  • 1.
  • 3.
    GnRH Agonist  Producedby Modification of the native GnRH decapeptide at 6 & 10 positions  Glp-His-Trp-Ser-Tyr-Gly-Leu-Arg-Pro-Gly- NH2 -LHRH  Glp-His-Trp-Ser-Tyr-Ser(But )-Leu-Arg- Pro-Azgly-NH2 - Goserelin
  • 4.
    HISTORY:  Discovered in1971  Introduced for medical use in 1980s  Most widely used GnRH is leuprolide and triptorelin.  Non proprietary names usually end in-relin.
  • 5.
     100 timesmore potent than natural LHRH  After initial agonistic action (flare response), down-regulation & desensitization of the pituitary: hypogonadotrophic, hypogonadal state. Mechanism
  • 7.
    Within 12 hof administration: Flare effect [lasting 24-48 h]  5 fold increase of FSH  10 fold rise in LH  4 fold elevation in E2. Effects of GnRHAgonist
  • 8.
    Continuous administration  Oppositeeffects: internalization of the agonist /receptor complex & decrease in the number of receptors (down-regulation).  paradoxical suppression of the pituitary Gnt synthesis & liberation (desensitization).
  • 10.
    The decreased levelsof FSH & LH:  Arrest of follicular development  Decrease in sex steroid levels to castrate levels.  Postmenopausal E2 levels are commonly reached after 21 days. The pituitary blockade persist during agonist treatment but it is reversible after therapy.
  • 11.
    LEUPROLIDE Most commonly usedGnRH agonist for endometriosis Two dosing options-11.25 mg once every 3 months 3.75mg One in each month
  • 12.
     Endometriosis.  Uterinefibroids.  Thinning agent in DUB (prior to endometrial ablation).  Pituitary down-regulation (in long protocol of IVF and induction of ovulation).  Adenomyiosis  Before & during chemotherapy for breast cancer to preserve ovarian function Indications
  • 13.
    GnRHa  An appropriatetherapy of Chronic pelvic pain, even in the absence of laparoscopic confirmation of Endometriosis. Provided that a detailed evaluation fails to demonstrate other cause. (ACOG Recommendations Grade (B) Endometriosis
  • 14.
    GnRHa with HormoneTherapy addback should be considered as 2nd line treatment No response to CHCs or progestins Recurrence of symptoms after initial improvement (SOGC, 2010) Indications
  • 16.
    GnRHa alone: Symptomsof estrogen deficiency  Hot flushes,  Insomnia,  Loss of libido,  Vaginal dryness,  Emotional instability, depression, headache  Loss of Bone Mineral Density, which is not always reversible Side Effects
  • 17.
    Aim: To preventdemineralization of bone & menopausal symptoms. GnRha should not be given as a single agent for >6 months. GnRHa should not be used for any length of time in the absence of HT addback (SOGC, 2010). Addback Therapy
  • 18.
     There isa threshold serum estrogen concentration that is  low enough that endometriosis is not stimulated  high enough that hypoestrogenic symptoms are prevented (Barbieri,1992)  same as that achieved with physiologic HT for menopausal women Add-back Rationale
  • 21.
     GnRHa: Painrelief 85-100% persisting for 6- 12 months after cessation of treatment. (Winkel et al,2005 )  GnRHa Vs other hormonal treatment: No difference with respect to pain relief or reduction in E deposits (Cochrane library, 2005). Efficacy
  • 22.
  • 23.
    Hormonal treatment thataims to reduce the proliferation of endometrial cells is promising, but there is a paucity of well-designed studies to guide treatment. There is a strong need to develop pharmacological agents that provide an efficient outcome (Farquhar et al, 2006).
  • 24.
    Commonly employed “addback” regimens are-  Low dose combined estrogen and progestrone  Estrogen only  Progestins alone  Bisphosphonates  Tibolone  Raloxifen Add-Back
  • 25.
     Synthetic steroid Estrogenic, progetogenic and androgenic action  Prevents loss of bone mineral density  Prevents vasomotor symptoms  Dose- 2.5mg for 3-6months with GnRHa Tibolone
  • 26.
     Synthetic nonsteroidal drug as an add back  Afferent to SERM  Weak estrogenic action at CNS, CVS and skeleton  Weak anti estrogenic at reproductive sites(uterus and breast) Raloxifen
  • 27.
     Addback withGnRH agonist  Decreases bone resorption  Alendronate- 5mg/day  Improves bone mineral density Bisphosphonates
  • 28.
     Combined estrogenand progestin add back therapy protect the bone and prevents hot flushes and vaginal atrophy
  • 29.
     Ongoing researchto identify other uses  Antagonists with better tolerance need to be explored  Injudicious use is not advocated  Clinicians should be made full aware to realise the drugs full potential  When used appropriately with full potential it can be labelled as “wonder drug”. Conclusion